Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache - The Lancet

6 downloads 0 Views 716KB Size Report
Apr 7, 2008 - 47% for headache in general, 10% for migraine, 38% for tension-type headache, and 3% for chronic headache that lasts for more than 15 days ...
Review

Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache Rigmor Jensen, Lars J Stovner Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 354–61 Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark (R Jensen MD); and Norwegian National Headache Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (LJ Stovner MD) Correspondence to: Rigmor Jensen, Danish Headache Center, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark [email protected]

The burden associated with headache is a major public health problem, the true magnitude of which has not been fully acknowledged until now. Globally, the percentage of the adult population with an active headache disorder is 47% for headache in general, 10% for migraine, 38% for tension-type headache, and 3% for chronic headache that lasts for more than 15 days per month. The large costs of headache to society, which are mostly indirect through loss of work time, have been reported. On the individual level, headaches cause disability, suffering, and loss of quality of life that is on a par with other chronic disorders. Most of the burden of headache is carried by a minority who have substantial and complicating comorbidities. Renewed recognition of the burden of headache and increased scientific interest have led to a better understanding of the risk factors and greater insight into the pathogenic mechanisms, which might lead to improved prevention strategies and the early identification of patients who are at risk.

Introduction Headache is the most prevalent neurological symptom1 and is experienced by almost everyone. Headache can be a symptom of a serious life-threatening disease, such as a brain tumour, but in most cases it is a benign disorder that comprises a primary headache such as migraine or tension-type headache (TTH).2 Nevertheless, migraine and TTH can cause substantial levels of disability, not only to patients and their families but also to society as a whole owing to its high prevalence in the general population.3–7 Unfortunately, the scope and scale of the burden of headache is underestimated, and headache disorders are universally under-recognized and undertreated. An important initiative, Lifting the Burden: The Global Campaign to Reduce the Burden of Headache, focuses on these widespread aspects of headache and is a collaboration between multinational health-care organisations and professionals to raise awareness of headache disorders in general.8 Another initiative, Cost of the Brain Disorders in Europe, includes migraine as a separate neurological disorder that ranks as number nine on the list of the most costly neurological disorders in both sexes, and as number three in women.1,6 TTH is the most common form of headache and is often thought of as a normal headache, in contrast to debilitating and characteristic migraine attacks or cluster headaches. Owing to its high prevalence, disability due to TTH is greater than that for migraine at the population level.3 Headache is among the ten most disabling disorders for both sexes and, if the burden of TTH is taken into account, among the five most disabling disorders for women, in accordance with the WHO’s ranking of the most disabling disorders.3 The main objectives of this Review are to present the recent epidemiological knowledge about primary headache disorders, their comorbidities, costs, risk factors, and prognoses.

Epidemiology Prevalence Although there are no biological markers for primary headaches such as migraine and TTH, their diagnosis is made with relatively high precision on the basis of the 354

diagnostic criteria of the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II),9 which were published in 2004 and are now applied worldwide. There might, however, be problems with case definitions in epidemiological studies, particularly the definition of TTH, which can greatly influence the prevalence rate; for example, problems can arise because the definition of TTH can overlap with probable migraine,10 and migraine is almost always comorbid with TTH. This might explain why the prevalence of TTH tends to vary more than the prevalence of migraine. Overall, the current global prevalence of headache is 47%, of migraine is 10%, of TTH is 38%, and of chronic headache is 3%.3 As expected, the lifetime prevalences are higher: 66% for headache, 14% for migraine, 46% for TTH, and 3·4% for chronic headache.3 The ICHD criteria can be used to summarise regional prevalences of headache disorders. Migraine is more prevalent in Europe and North America than it is in Africa (figure 1),3,7,10–37 whereas the prevalence of TTH seems to be much higher in Europe (80%) than it is in Asia and the Americas (20–30%). The frequency and duration of TTH varies considerably: from infrequent, short-lasting periods of discomfort to frequent, longlasting, or even continuous, disabling headaches. Therefore, pooling these extremes into an overall prevalence figure might be misleading. The lifetime prevalence of TTH was as high as 86% in a populationbased study in Denmark, but most of the patients (59%) had episodic infrequent TTH (1 day or less per month) without the need for medical attention.38 Nevertheless, 24–37% had TTH several times a month, 10% had TTH weekly, and 2–3% of the population had chronic TTH for most of their life.26,38,39 Data on chronic headache (lasting ≥15 days per month) are relatively scarce and therefore less reliable. In clinical practice, reports of chronic headache should always raise suspicion of a secondary headache due to neurological or systemic disease or frequent use of medication—socalled medication-overuse headache. Medication-overuse headache is a secondary chronic headache associated with more than 3 months’ overuse of analgesics (15 days http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 7 April 2008

Review

11·622

13·223

10·026

14·710 13·311

23·221

10·237

11·714

22·335 9·628

12·2

12

14·015

8·436

14·3

25

24·624

5·934

16·727

8·516

11·613

7·733 8·5

7

10·07

10·129 9·032

13·519 12·6

7

3·0

30

9·37

5·031

16·317 8·27 5·318

7·320

5·07

Africa 4·0 (2 studies)

Europe 14·8 (9 studies)

Asia 10·6 (6 studies)

North America 11·1 (7 studies)

Australia

South America 9·6 (10 studies)

• • • •

IHS or modified IHS criteria Population or community based >500 participants Covering at least age groups 25–60 years

Figure 1: Studies on the 1-year migraine prevalence in adults3,7,10–37

or more intake per month) or more specific substances, such as triptans or ergotamine (≥10 days’ intake per month).9 The global prevalence of chronic headache is 3·4%, and it is most common in Central and South America (5%), and least common in Africa (1·7%).3,40–44 There are only a few large-scale epidemiological studies of cluster headache, and the lifetime prevalence in five European studies ranges from 0·06% to 0·3%.45–49 Whether regional differences are real or mainly a result of differences in the methodology of the various studies is uncertain. Many factors in addition to case definition influence the calculation of headache prevalence; these include the time frame of the headache, the method of data collection, the age and sex of the population, the participation rate, how the diagnostic criteria are applied, which diagnoses are considered, and, most importantly, how the screening questions are asked.50

Sex and age The male:female ratio for migraine among adults varies from 1:2 to 1:3, and women have more migraine without aura than migraine with aura.51,52 In prepubertal children, there is generally no sex difference.53 The male:female ratio for TTH is 4:5, indicating that, unlike for migraine, women are only slightly more affected than men.26,38,39 For both sexes, the prevalence of TTH peaks between the ages of 30 and 39 years, and the prevalence of http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 7 April 2008

headache, in general, decreases with age. The prevalence of migraine increases with age until a peak is reached during the fourth decade of life; thereafter, the prevalence declines, with a more pronounced decline in women than in men.3,26,38,51,52 The most common age of onset of migraine is in the second and third decades of life (figure 2).26,52 The average age of onset of TTH is higher than for migraine, namely between 25 and 30 years in cross-sectional epidemiological studies,24,26,52 and TTH as well as other chronic headaches are probably lifelong disorders: prevalences tend to increase until the fifth decade, with only a minor decline with increasing age.

For more on the global campaign to lift the burden of headache worldwide see http:// www.liftingtheburden.org/

Incidence The incidence of developing migraine de novo has been estimated only rarely with uncertain results. In a Danish epidemiological follow-up study, the annual incidence of migraine was 8·1 per 1000 person years (male:female ratio 1:6) and 14.2 per 1000 person years for frequent TTH (male:female ratio 1:3).54 Both rates decreased with age. Risk factors for migraine include familial disposition, lack of secondary education, high work load, and frequent TTH. The risk factors for TTH include poor self-rated health, inability to relax after work, and sleeping for only a few hours per night. The incidence of migraine was higher than previously estimated from cross-sectional 355

Review

30 Women Men

Migraine prevalence (%)

25

20

15

10

5

0 30) than in those who are normal weight.78 The area is further complicated because obesity is also a dependent risk factor for depression and anxiety. The association between depression and migraine is reported to be bidirectional: migraineurs have a fivefold higher risk of depression than the general population, and patients with depression have a threefold higher risk of migraine than the general population.87 There is a similar bidirectional association between anxiety and migraine. Taken together, the results of these studies support theories of a common neurobiology.88,89 However, when population-based data were adjusted for coexisting TTH, it was clear that TTH but not pure migraine was the main predictor for depression and anxiety.90 Therefore, in future long-term epidemiological studies, and in our work as headache doctors, it is important to identify comorbid disorders, including coexisting headache diagnoses, because the neurobiology, management, and outcome of headache are closely correlated with comorbidity.

Prognosis The results of a 40-year follow-up of 73 children with pronounced migraine showed that before the age of 25, http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 7 April 2008

Review

23% of the patients did not have migraine, and women were significantly more likely to have migraine,91 but more than 50% still had migraine when they were around 50 years old. In a 12-year longitudinal epidemiological study from Denmark, 549 people participated in the follow-up study. Of 64 migraineurs at baseline, 42% were in remission, 38% had low-frequency migraine, and 20% had a poor outcome—more than 14 migraine days per year—at follow-up. Poor outcome was associated with a high frequency of migraine at baseline and an age of onset younger than 20 years,54 which accords with the results of a UK study on the prognosis of headache in general.92 Few studies have investigated the prognosis of patients with TTH. In the longitudinal study of the Danish population, 45% were in remission, 39% had unchanged frequent episodic TTH, and 16% had unchanged or newly developed chronic TTH at follow-up. Poor outcome was associated with chronic TTH at baseline, coexisting migraine, not being married, and sleeping problems.54 In a clinic-based 10-year follow-up study of 62 patients with episodic TTH, 75% continued to have episodic headache, whereas episodic TTH had developed into the chronic form in 25% of patients. In those patients with initial chronic TTH, at follow-up 31% were unchanged, 21% had developed medication-overuse headache, and the remainder had reverted to the episodic form, with or without prophylactic treatment.93 Depression, anxiety, and medication overuse were predictors of poor outcome in the clinical setting, and these patients might request increased medical attention in the future. Also, there are few clinical longitudinal reports for cluster headaches. In a 10-year Italian follow-up study, 13% of patients with an episodic form of cluster headache developed chronic cluster headache, whereas 33% of those with a chronic form developed the episodic form,94 and only 10% had no cluster headache during the past 3 years.94

Conclusions In conclusion, headache disorders are among the most prevalent, burdensome, and costly diseases in the world, and there is an urgent need for acceptance, education, and scientific interest. Most of the severely affected patients also have profound comorbid disorders, which complicate their overall management and outcome. Thus, the burden of headache on the patient, their families, and on society is considerable. Limited knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology combined with a lack of academic interest has previously resulted in the use of non-specific treatments, although management of migraine has improved and interest has increased during the past decade. Headache-related disability can be markedly reduced by increasing general awareness of headache, better education among health-care professionals, and the identification of trigger factors combined with http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 7 April 2008

Search strategy and selection criteria References for this Review were identified by searches of MEDLINE between 1988 and September, 2007, and from the extensive files of the authors. The search terms “migraine”, “cluster headache”, “tension-type headache”, “daily headaches”, “epidemiology”, “comorbidity”, “prognosis”, and “burden of headache” were used. Abstracts from meetings were also included. Only papers published in English were included. The final reference list was compiled on the basis of originality, quality, use of the ICHD classification system, and relevance to the topic.

pharmacological management, although we still lack specific preventive modalities. Most importantly, early intervention, the identification of risk factors, and lifestyle associations might lead to effective strategies to prevent chronification of headache, which will have considerable benefits for the patient and the society. Contributors RJ made the initial plan and wrote the abstract, the introduction, and the sections about prevalence, incidence, and comorbidities. LJS participated in the planning of the Review, the literature list, and wrote the sections about cost and disability of headache. Conflicts of interest We have no conflicts of interest. References 1 Andlin-Sobocki P, Jönsson B, Wittchen HU, Olesen J. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12: 1–27. 2 Jensen R, Rasmussen BK. Burden of headache. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2004; 4: 353–59. 3 Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 193–210. 4 Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon D, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA 1998; 279: 381–83. 5 Boardman HF, Thomas E, Croft PR, Millson DS. Epidemiology of headache in an English district. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 129–37. 6 Olesen J, Leonardi M. The burden of brain diseases in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2003; 10: 471–77. 7 Morillo LE, Alarcon F, Aranaga N, et al. Prevalence of migraine in Latin America. Headache 2005; 45: 106–17. 8 Steiner TJ. Lifting the burden: the global campaign against headache. Lancet Neurol 2004; 3: 204–05. 9 The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004; 24 (suppl 1): 9–160. 10 O’Brien B, Goeree R, Streiner D. Prevalence of migraine headache in Canada: a population-based survey. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 1020–26. 11 Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Lost workdays and decreased work effectiveness associated with headache in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39: 320–27. 12 Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond ML, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001; 41: 646–57. 13 Lipton RB, Scher AI, Kolodner K, Liberman J, Steiner TJ, Stewart WF. Migraine in the United States: epidemiology and patterns of health care use. Neurology 2002; 58: 885–94. 14 Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, Reed ML. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA 1992; 267: 64–69. 15 Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Liberman J. Variation in migraine prevalence by race. Neurology 1996; 47: 52–59. 16 Kryst S, Scherl E. A population-based survey of the social and personal impact of headache. Headache 1994; 34: 344–50.

359

Review

17

18

19 20 21

22

23 24

25

26

27

28 29

30

31

32 33

34

35

36 37

38

39

40 41

360

Wiehe M, Fuchs SC, Moreira LB, Moraes RS, Fuchs FD. Migraine is more frequent in individuals with optimal and normal blood pressure: a population-based study. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1303–06. Jaillard AS, Mazetti P, Kala E. Prevalence of migraine and headache in a high-altitude town of Peru: a population-based study. Headache 1997; 37: 95–101. Miranda H, Ortiz G, Figueroa S, Pena D, Guzman J. Prevalence of headache in Puerto Rico. Headache 2003; 43: 774–78. Lavados PM, Tenhamm E. Epidemiology of migraine headache in Santiago, Chile: a prevalence study. Cephalalgia 1997; 17: 770–77. Launer LJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD. The prevalence and characteristics of migraine in a population-based cohort: the GEM study. Neurology 1999; 53: 537–42. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Vatten L, Stovner LJ, Bovim G. Prevalence of migraine and non-migrainous headache-head-HUNT, a large population-based study. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 900–6. Dahlof C, Linde M. One-year prevalence of migraine in Sweden: a population-based study in adults. Cephalalgia 2001; 21: 664–71. Merikangas KR, Whitaker AE, Isler H, Angst J. The Zurich Study: XXIII. Epidemiology of headache syndromes in the Zurich cohort study of young adults. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994; 244: 145–52. Steiner TJ, Scher AI, Stewart WF, Kolodner K, Liberman J, Lipton RB. The prevalence and disability burden of adult migraine in England and their relationships to age, gender and ethnicity. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 519–27. Rasmussen BK, Jensen R, Schroll M, Olesen J. Epidemiology of headache in a general population--a prevalence study. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1147–57. Zivadinov R, Willheim K, Jurjevic A, Sepic-Grahovac D, Bucuk M, Zorzon M. Prevalence of migraine in Croatia: a population-based survey. Headache 2001; 41: 805–12. Bank J, Marton S. Hungarian migraine epidemiology. Headache 2000; 40: 164–69. Deleu D, Khan MA, Al Shehab TA. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of headache in a rural community in oman. Headache 2002; 42: 963–73. Tekle Haimanot R, Seraw B, Forsgren L, Ekbom K, Ekstedt J. Migraine, chronic tension-type headache, and cluster headache in an Ethiopian rural community. Cephalalgia 1995; 15: 482–88. Dent W, Spiss H, Helbok R, Matuja W, Scheunemann S, Schmutzhard E. Prevalence of migraine in a rural area in South Tanzania: a door-to-door survey. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 960–66. Alders EE, Hentzen A, Tan CT. A community-based prevalence study on headache in Malaysia. Headache 1996; 36: 379–84. Wang SJ, Fuh JL, Young YH, Lu SR, Shia BC. Prevalence of migraine in Taipei, Taiwan: a population-based survey. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 566–72. Takeshima T, Ishizaki K, Fukuhara Y, et al. Population-based doorto-door survey of migraine in Japan: the Daisen study. Headache 2004; 44: 8–19. Roh JK, Kim JS, Ahn YO. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of migraine and tension-type headache in Korea. Headache 1998; 38: 356–65. Sakai F, Igarashi H. Prevalence of migraine in Japan: a nationwide survey. Cephalalgia 1997; 17: 15–22. Lampl C, Buzath A, Baumhackl U, Klingler D. One-year prevalence of migraine in Austria: a nation-wide survey. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 280–86. Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jørgensen T, Jensen R. Has the prevalence of migraine and tension-type headache changed over a 12-year period? A Danish population survey. Eur J Epidemiol 2005; 20: 243–49. Göbel H, Petersen-Braun M, Soyka D. The epidemiology of headache in Germany: a nationwide survey of a representative sample on the basis of the headache classification of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1994; 14: 97–106. Cheung RT. Prevalence of migraine, tension-type headache, and other headaches in Hong Kong. Headache 2000; 40: 473–79. Kavuk I, Yavuz A, Cetindere U, Agelink MW, Diener HC. Epidemiology of chronic daily headache. Eur J Med Res 2003; 8: 236–40.

42

43 44

45

46 47 48

49

50 51

52 53 54 55

56

57

58 59 60

61

62 63 64

65

66

67

68

Lanteri-Minet M, Auray JP, El Hasnaoui A, et al. Prevalence and description of chronic daily headache in the general population in France. Pain 2003; 102: 143–49. Pascual J, Colas R, Castillo J. Epidemiology of chronic daily headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001; 5: 529–36. Wang SJ, Fuh JL, Lu SR, et al. Chronic daily headache in Chinese elderly: prevalence, risk factors, and biannual follow-up. Neurology 2000; 54: 314–19. Tonon C, Guttmann S, Volpini M, Naccarato S, Cortelli P, D’Alessandro R. Prevalence and incidence of cluster headache in the Republic of San Marino. Neurology 2002; 58: 1407–09. Sjaastad O, Bakketeig LS. Cluster headache prevalence. Vaga study of headache epidemiology. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 528–33. Torelli P, Beghi E, Manzoni GC. Cluster headache prevalence in the Italian general population. Neurology 2005; 64: 469–74. Katsarava Z, Obermann M, Yoon MS, et al. Prevalence of cluster headache in a population-based sample in Germany. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 1014–19. Ekbom K, Svensson DA, Pedersen NL, Waldenlind E. Lifetime prevalence and concordance risk of cluster headache in the Swedish twin population. Neurology 2006; 67: 798–803. Stovner LJ, Zwart JA, Hagen K, Terwindt G, Pascual J. Epidemiology of headache in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 333–45. Zwart JA, Dyb G, Holmen TL, et al. The prevalence of migraine and tension-type headaches among adolescents in Norway: The NordTrøndelag Health Study (Head-Hunt). Cephalagia 2004; 24: 373–79. Rasmussen BK. Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 2001; 21: 774–77. Bille B. Migraine and tension-type headache in children and adolescents. Cephalalgia 1996; 16: 78. Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jørgensen T, et al. Prognosis of migraine and tension-type headache. Neurology 2005; 65: 580–85. Swanson JW, Yanagihara T, Stang PE, et al. Incidence of cluster headaches: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology 1994; 44: 433–37. Black DF, Swanson JW, Stang PE. Decreasing incidence of cluster headache: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Headache 2005; 45: 220–23. Hu XH, Markson LE, Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Berger ML. Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 813–18. Berg J, Stovner LJ. Cost of migraine and other headaches in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12 (suppl 1): 59–62. Berg J. Economic evidence in migraine and other headaches: a review. Eur J Health Econom 2004; 5: S43–S54. Rasmussen BK, Jensen R, Olesen J. Impact of headache on sickness absence and utilisation of medical services: a Danish population study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 443–46. Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jensen R, et al. Secular changes in health care utilization and work absence for migraine and tensiontype headache. A population based study. J Epidemiol Com Health 2005; 20: 1007–14. Lenaerts ME. Burden of tension-type headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2006; 10: 459–66 Jensen RM, Lyngberg A, Jensen RH. Burden of cluster headache. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 535–41. Dahlöf CG, Dimenäs E. Migraine patients experience poorer subjective well-being/quality of life even between attacks. Cephalalgia 1995; 15: 31–36. Linde M, Dahlöf C. Attitudes and burden of disease among selfconsidered migraineurs—a nation-wide population-based survey in Sweden. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 455–65. Leonardi M, Steiner TJ, Scher AT, Lipton RB. The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO’s classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Headache Pain 2005; 6: 429–40. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB, Sawyer J, Lee C, Liberman JN. Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 2000; 88: 41–52. Lucas C, Chaffaut C, Artaz MA, Lantéri-Minet M. FRAMIG 2000: medical and therapeutic management of migraine in France. Cephalalgia 2005; 25: 267–79.

http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 7 April 2008

Review

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77 78 79

80

81

Hamelsky SW, Lipton RB, Stewart WF. An assessment of the burden of migraine using the willingness to pay model. Cephalalgia 2005; 25: 87–100. Lipton RB, Liberman JN, Kolodner KB, Bigal ME, Dowson A, Stewart WF. Migraine headache disability and health-related quality-of-life: a population-based case-control study from England. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 441–50. Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD, Tijhuis M, Groenen SM, Picavet HS, Launer LJ. The impact of migraine on quality of life in the general population: the GEM study. Neurology 2000; 55: 624–629. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Kolodner K, Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Steiner TJ. The family impact of migraine: population-based studies in the USA and UK. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 429–40. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Kolodner KB, Steiner TJ, Stewart WF. Migraine, quality of life, and depression: a population-based casecontrol study. Neurology 2000; 55: 629–35. First MB. Mutually exclusive versus co-occurring diagnostic categories: the challenge of diagnostic comorbidity. Psychopathology 2005; 38: 206–10. Bigal ME, Sheftell FD, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Tepper SJ. Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population: correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 432–38. Zeeberg P, Olesen J, Jensen R. Efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment in a tertiary referral headache centre. Cephalalgia 2005; 25: 1159–67. Katsarava Z, Jensen R. Medication-overuse headache: where are we now? Curr Opin Neurol 2007; 20: 326–30. Scher A, Bigal, ME Lipton RB. Comorbidity of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol 2005; 18: 305–10. Aamodt AH, Stovner LJ, Midthjell K, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Headache prevalence related to diabetes mellitus. The Head-HUNT study. Eur J Neurol 2007; 14: 738–44. Hagen K, Einarsen C, Zwart JA, Svebak S, Bovim G. The cooccurrence of headache and musculoskeletal symptoms amongst 51050 adults in Norway. Eur J Neurol 2002; 9: 527–33. Zwart JA, Dyb G, Hagen K, et al. Depression and anxiety disorders associated with headache frequency. The Nord-Trondelag Health Study. Eur J Neurol 2003; 20: 147–52.

http://neurology.thelancet.com Vol 7 April 2008

82 83 84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91 92

93

94

Tietjen GE, Herial NA, Hardgrove J, Utley C, White L. Migraine comorbidity constellations. Headache 2007; 47: 857–65. Bousser MG, Welch KM. Relation between migraine and stroke. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 533–42. Kurth T, Gaziano JM, Cook NR, Logroscino G, Diener HC, Buring JE. Migraine and risk of cardiovascular disease in women. JAMA 2006; 296: 283–91. Hagen K, Stovner LJ, Vatten L, Holmen J, Zwart JA, Bovim G. Blood pressure and risk of headache: a prospective study of 22 685 adults in Norway. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 463–66. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Obesity is a risk factor for transformed migraine but not chronic tension-type headache. Neurology 2006; 67: 252–7. Breslau N, Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Schultz LR, Welch KM. Comorbidity of migraine and depression: investigating potential etiology and prognosis. Neurology 2003; 60: 1308–12. Merikangas KR, Merikangas JR, Angst J. Headache syndromes and psychiatric disorders: association and familial transmission. J Psychiatr Res 1993; 27: 197–210. McWilliams LA, Goodwin RD, Cox BJ. Depression and anxiety associated with three pain conditions: results from a nationally representative sample. Pain 2004; 111: 77–83. Lyngberg AC, Rasmussen BK, Jørgensen T, Jensen R. The association between poor well-being and migraine is related to coexisting tension-type headache. Cephalalgia 2005; 5: 968. Bille B. A 40-year follow-up of school children with migraine. Cephalalgia 1997; 17: 488–491. Boardman HF, Thomas E, Millson DS, Croft PR. The natural history of headache: predictors of onset and recovery. Cephalalgia 2006; 26: 1080–88. Mork H, Jensen R. Prognosis of tension-type headache: a 10-year follow-up study of patients with frequent tension-type headache. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 434. Manzoni GC, Micieli G, Granella F, Tassorelli C, Zanferrari C, Cavallini A. Cluster headache course over ten years in 189 patients. Cephalalgia 1991; 11: 169–74.

361