Erector Spinae Plane Block For Anterior Approach

0 downloads 0 Views 614KB Size Report
epinephrine 1: 200.000 were administered. The pa$ent was extubated and transferred to the ICU, where a local anesthe$c infusion (bupivacaine 0.1% without ...
Erector Spinae Plane Block For Anterior Approach Scoliosis Surgery In Neurofibromatosis Leonardo  Cendales  P,  Carolina  Perez  P,  Juan  Pablo  Vivas  H,  Carlos  Largo  P.     Department  Of  Anesthesia,  Rooselvelt  Pediatric  Hospital     Introduc)on  

Case  

Discussion  

Scoliosis  is  the  skeletal  altera.on  most  frequently  found  in  pa.ents   with  Neurofibromatosis  type  1.  The  erector  spinae  block  (ESP)  is  a   recently  described  technique  for  analgesic  management  of  pa.ents   with   acute   or   chronic   pain,   there   are   no   reports   regarding   this   technique  in  pa.ents  undergoing  scoliosis  surgery.  

A  pa.ent    15  years  old,    34  kg,  ASA  2  and  with  a  previous  diagnosis  of   neurofibromatosis   type   I   presents     scheduled   for   scoliosis   correc.on   surgery.    X-­‐  rays  show  thoracic  scoliosis  with    a  Cobb  angle  of  110  (Fig   1).     The   first   procedure   was   performed   using   TIVA   (total   intravenous   anesthesia).   Basic   ASA   monitoring   was   used   in   addi.on   to   internal   yugular   and   radial   artery   catheteriza.on.   Intraopera.ve   neurophysiological  monitoring  was  also  used  during  the  procedure.     A  T6  and  T7  corpectomy  by  anterior  thoracotomy  was  performed  by  an   orthopedic   surgeon.   At   the   end   of   the   procedure,   with   the   pa.ent   posi.oned   in   the   right   lateral   decubitus,   using   a   M-­‐turbo   Sonosite®   ultrasound,  the  T5  transverse  process  was  located  and  a  puncture  was   made  using  a  #18  G  X    90  mm  Touhy  needle.  A  catheter  was  advanced   and   hydrodisec.on   performed   to   verify   the   posi.oning,   then   the   catheter   was   fixed   at   3   cms.   30   mL   of   Bupivacaine   0.25   %   with   epinephrine  1:  200.000  were  administered.     The   pa.ent   was     extubated   and   transferred   to   the   ICU,   where   a   local   anesthe.c  infusion  (bupivacaine  0.1%  without  epinephrine)  was  started   through   the   catheter   at   8   mL/h,   in   addi.on   to   Dipirone   600   mg   /   8   hours  and  Morphine  exclusively  as  a  rescue  dose.     Pain   was   evaluated   using   the   Visual   Analogue   Scale   (VAS)   at   2,   4,   8,   12,   24,  48  and  72    hours  postop  finding  scores  of  5/10  ,  4/10,  8/10,  7/10,   7/10,  4/10,  2/10    respec.vely.     In  the  8  hour  evalua.on  a  1.5  mg  dose  of  morphine  was  administered.   At   the   24   hour   evalua.on   with   a   VAS   of   7/10   the   decision   was   made   to   administer   bolus   of   10   mL   of   Bupivacaine   0.1%   through   the   catheter,   obtaining   a   reduc.on   in   the   VAS   score,   therefore     it   was   decided   to   increase   the   infusion   rate   to   9   mL/h.   With   the   aforemen.oned   adjustment   the   VAS   score   stayed   between   2/10   and   4/10.   Ader   72   hours  the  catheter  was  removed  without  any  adverse  outcomes.          

Forero  and  colleagues  described  the  ESP  block  for  the  first  .me  in  2016  for   the   treatment   of     pa.ents   with   neuropathic   chest   pain   secondary   to   thoracotomy.   Since   then   this   technique   has     also   be   described   as   an   analgesic  op.on  for  pediatric  popula.on  in  other  surgical  scenarios  such  as   pectum   excavatum   surgery,   thoracotomy   and   resec.ons   of   costal.   In   this   case,   we   used   this   technique   to   provide   analgesia   for   a   pa.ent   who   underwent   vertebrectomy   for   scoliosis   correc.on   surgery,   obtaining   excellent   results   in   pain   control   up   to   72   hours   postop   with   minimal   opioid   use.  To  this  date  we  find  a  limita.on  in  the  fact  that  no  reports  or  evidence   sugges.ng  op.mal  volume  doses  for  ESP  in  pediatric  popula.on  are  found   in  the  literature,  finding  case  reports  with  volumes  as  high  as  30  mL  with   excellent  results.    



Fig.  1    

References   -­‐   Forero   M,   Adhikary   SD,   Lopez   H,   Tsui   C,   Chin   KJ.   The   erector   spinae   plane   block   a   novel   analgesic   technique  in  thoracic  neuropathic  pain.  Reg  Anesth  Pain  Med.  2016;41(5):621–7.   -­‐   Plane   ES,   Edge   S,   Picu   A.   Con.nuous   Erector   Spinae   Plane   block   for   thoracic   surgery   in   a   pediatric   pa.ent.  :74–5.   -­‐  Muñoz  F,  Cubillos  J,  Bonilla  AJ,  Chin  KJ.  Erector  spinae  plane  block  for   postopera.ve   analgesia   in   pediatric   oncological   thoracic   surgery.   Can   J   AnesthCan   d’anesthésie   [Internet].  2017;64(8):880–2.    

Conclusion   The   ESP   block   is   an   excellent   analgesic   op.on   for   thoracic   and   scoliosis   surgery,   by   itself   or   as   part   of   a   mul.modal   approach,   its   success   may   depend   on   the   local   anesthe.c   volume   administered.   There   is   a   need   for   proper  training  in  the  use  of  the  technique  but  once  this  is  accomplished   the  procedure  can  be  done  safely  regardless  of  the  spine  devia.on  found   in  this  pa.ents.       Fig.  2      

Erector Spinae Plane Block For Anterior Approach Scoliosis Surgery In Neurofibromatosis Leonardo  Cendales  P,  Carolina  Perez  P,  Juan  Pablo  Vivas  H,  Carlos  Largo  P.     Department  Of  Anesthesia,  Rooselvelt  Pediatric  Hospital    

Introduc)on   Scoliosis   is   the   skeletal   altera.on   most   frequently   found   in   pa.ents   with   Neurofibromatosis   type   1.   The   erector   spinae   block   (ESP)   is   a   recently   described   technique   for  analgesic  management  of  pa.ents  with  acute  or  chronic  pain,  there  are  no  reports  regarding  this  technique  in  pa.ents  undergoing  scoliosis  surgery.  

Case  

 A  pa.ent    15  years  old,    34  kg,  ASA  2  and  with  a  previous  diagnosis  of  neurofibromatosis  type  I  presents    scheduled  for  scoliosis  correc.on  surgery.    X-­‐  rays  show   thoracic  scoliosis  with    a  Cobb  angle  of  110.     The  first  procedure  was  performed  using  TIVA  (total  intravenous  anesthesia).  Basic  ASA  monitoring  was  used  in  addi.on  to  internal  yugular  and  radial  artery   catheteriza.on.  Intraopera.ve  neurophysiological  monitoring  was  also  used  during  the  procedure.     A  T6  and  T7  corpectomy  by  anterior  thoracotomy  was  performed  by  an  orthopedic  surgeon.  At  the  end  of  the  procedure,  with  the  pa.ent  posi.oned  in  the  right   lateral  decubitus,  using  a  M-­‐turbo  Sonosite®  ultrasound,  the  T5  transverse  process  was  located  and  a  puncture  was  made  using  a  #18  G  X    90  mm  Touhy  needle.  A   catheter  was  advanced  and  hydrodisec.on  performed  to  verify  the  posi.oning,  then  the  carheter  was  fixed  at  3  cms.  30  mL  of  Bupivacaine  0.25  %  with     epinephrine  1:  200.000  were  administered.     The  pa.ent  was    extubated  and  transferred  to  the  ICU,  where  a  local  anesthe.c  infusion  (bupivacaine  0.1%  without  epinephrine)  was  started  through  the  catheter   at  8  mL/h,  in  adi.on  to  Dipirone  600  mg  /  8  hours  and  Morphine  exclusively  as  a  rescue  dose.     Pain  was  evaluated  using  the  Visual  Analogue  Scale  (VAS)  at  2,  4,  8,  12,  24,  48  and  72    hours  postop  finding  scores  of  5/10  ,  4/10,  8/10,  7/10,  7/10,  4/10,  2/10     respec.vely.     In  the  8  hour  evalua.on  a  1.5  mg  dose  of  morphine  was  administered.  At  the  24  hour  evalua.on  with  a  VAS  of  7/10  the  desi.on  was  made  to  administer  bolus  of   10  mL  of  Bupivacaine  0.1%  through  the  catheter,    obtaining  a  reduc.on  in  the  VAS  score,  therefore    it  was  decided  to  increse  the  infusion  rate  to  9  mL/h.  With  the   aforemen.oned    adjustment  the  VAS  score  stayed  between  2/10  and  4/10.  Ader  72  hours  the  catheter  was  removed  without  any  adverse  outcomes.        

Discussion   Forero   and   colleagues   described   the   ESP   block   for   the   first   .me   in   2016   for   the   treatment   of     pa.ents   with   neuropathic   chest   pain   secondary   to   thoracotomy.   Since   then   this   technique   has     also   be   described   as   an   analgesic  op.on  for  pediatric  popula.on  in  other  surgical  scenarios  such  as  pectum  excavatum  surgery,     thoracotomy  and  resec.ons  of  costal.  In  this  case,  we  used  this  technique  to  provide  analgesia  for  a  pa.ent  who  underwent  vertebrectomy  for  scoliosis  correc.on     surgery,  obtaining  excellent  results  in  pain  control  up  to  72  hours  postop  with  minimal  opioid  use.  To  this  date  we  find  a  limita.on  in  the  fact  that  no  reports  or  evidence   sugges.ng  op.mal  volume  doses  for  ESP    in  pediatric  popula.on  are  found  in  the  literature,  finding  case  reports  with  volumes  as  high  as  30  mL  with  excellent  results.    

Conclusion  

Fig.  2    

The   ESP   block   is   an   excellent   analgesic   op.on   for   thoracic   and   scoliosis   surgery,   by   itself   or   as   part   of   a   mul.modal   approach,   its   success   may   depend   on   the   local   anesthe.c   volume   administered.   There   is   a   need   for   proper   training   in   the   use   of   the   technique   but   once   this   is   accomplished   the   procedure   can   be   done   safely   regardless  of  the  spine  devia.on  found  in  this  pa.ents.     References   •  Forero  M,  Adhikary  SD,  Lopez  H,  Tsui  C,  Chin  KJ.  The  erector  spinae  plane  block  a  novel  analgesic  technique  in  thoracic  neuropathic  pain.  Reg   Anesth  Pain  Med.  2016;41(5):621–7.   •  Plane  ES,  Edge  S,  Picu  A.  Con.nuous  Erector  Spinae  Plane  block  for  thoracic  surgery  in  a  pediatric  pa.ent.  :74–5.   •  Muñoz  F,  Cubillos  J,  Bonilla  AJ,  Chin  KJ.  Erector  spinae  plane  block  for   •  postopera.ve  analgesia  in  pediatric  oncological  thoracic  surgery.  Can  J  AnesthCan  d’anesthésie  [Internet].  2017;64(8):880–2.    



Fig.  1