Evaluation and Validation of Updated MODIS C6 and VIIRS LAI/FPAR Kai Yan 1,2,*, Taejin Park 1, Chi Chen 1 , Guangjian Yan2, Bin Yang 1,3, Sungho Choi 1 , Jian Bi 1 Yuri Knyazikhin 2 and Ranga B. Myneni 2 1 2 3
Department of Geography and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA; School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Lab of Spatial Information Integration & Its Applications, Institute of RS & GIS, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail:
[email protected]; Tel.: +1-617-751-8410; Fax: +86-010-58805274.
Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (0.4–0.7 μm) absorbed by vegetation (FPAR) play a key role in characterizing vegetation canopy functioning and energy absorption capacity. With radiative transfer realization, MODIS onboard NASA EOS Terra and Aqua satellites has provided globally continuous LAI/FPAR since 2000 and continuously updated the products with better quality. And NPP VIIRS shows the measurement capability to extend high-quality LAI/FPAR time series data records as a successor of MODIS. The primary objectives of this study are 1) to evaluate and validate newly updated MODIS Collection 6 (C6) LAI/FPAR product which has finer resolution (500m) and improved biome type input, and 2) to examine and adjust VIIRS LAI/FPAR algorithm for continuity with MODIS’. For MODIS C6 investigation, we basically measure the spatial coverage (i.e., main radiative transfer algorithm execution), continuity and consistency with Collection 5 (C5), and accuracy with field measured LAI/FPAR. And we also validate C6 LAI/FPAR via comparing other possible global LAI/FPAR products (e.g., GLASS and CYCLOPES) and capturing co-varying seasonal signatures with climatic variables (e.g., temperature and precipitation)..For VIIRS evaluation and adjustment, we first quantify possible difference between C5 and MODIS heritage based VIIRS LAI/FPAR. Then based on the radiative transfer theory of canopy spectral invariants, we find VIIRS- and biome-specific configurable parameters (single scattering albedo and uncertainty). These two practices for MODIS C6 and VIIRS LAI/FPAR products clearly suggest that (a) MODIS C6 has better coverage and accuracy than C5, (b) C6 shows consistent spatiotemporal pattern with C5, (c) VIIRS has the potential for producing MODIS-like global LAI/FPAR Earth System Data Records.
Keywords: Evaluation and validation; Leaf Area Index (LAI); Fraction of Photo-synthetically Active Radiation (FPAR); MODIS; Collection 6; VIIRS
