Evaluation Of Aflatoxin M1 Contamination In ...

Vol 65, No. 2;Feb 2015

Evaluation Of Aflatoxin M1 Contamination In Consuming Milk Reyhaneh Rouhi1, Akbar Kazemi2, Abdolreza Sotoodeh Jahromi2*, Hassan Zabrtian1, Alireza Yousefi1, Abdolhossien Madani3, Mohammad Hojjat-Farsangi4 1.Research center for social determinants of health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran 2.Zonoses Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran 3.Research Center for Social Determinants in Health Promotion, Hormozgan University of Medical Science, Bandarabbas, Iran 4.Department of Oncology-Pathology, Immune and Gene therapy Lab, Cancer Center Karolinska (CCK), Karolinska University Hospital Solna and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. *Corresponding Author: Abdolreza Sotoodeh Jahromi, Zonoses Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran Abstract: Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) has been categorized as a class 2B carcinogen and its carcinogenicity was estimated to be one-tenth of that of AFB1. As milk is a major nutrient for infants، children، convalescents and old people, the presence of AFM1 in commercial milk and dairy products is a matter of concern. As milk is a major nutrient for infants، children، convalescents and old people, the presence of AFM1 in commercial milk and dairy products is a matter of concern. The aim of this survey was to determine concentrations of AFM1 in raw and pasteurized milk marketed in Jahrom city located in southern of Iran during two seasons. A total 120 milk samples including 90 raw milk samples and 30 pasteurized milk samples were examined by ELISA method to determine AFM1 concentration in Jahrom (a southern city in Iran), Jan. 2013 to jun. 2013. The presence of AFM1 was seen 8.33% including 6.7% and 13.3% of raw pasteurized milk respectively. The results indicated that the contamination of the kinds of milk in such level could be a serious public health problem. Inspection of milk and dairy products is recommended for AFM1 contamination. Key Words: Aflatoxin M1, Milk, Iran

INTRODUCTION Mycotoxins, secondary metabolites of fungi, are toxic for humans and animals (1, 2), among them, aflatoxins are produced by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus paratisicus and rarely by Aspergillus nomius which contaminate plants and plant products particularly under conditions that favor the growth of molds (1). The aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) has potent

471

Jokull Journal

Vol 65, No. 2;Feb 2015

carcinogenic and mutagenic effects in humans (3), When cows that consume feed mixtures containing corn polluted with AFB1 can then excrete aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) as ahydroxylated metabolite of AFB1 in milk (1) and excreted as AFM1 in the urine and also in milk (4). AFM1 has been categorized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a class 2B carcinogen and its carcinogenicity was estimated to be one-tenth of that of AFB1 by the Joint Expert Committee on Contamination and Food Additives in 2001 (5). As milk is a major nutrient for infants، children، convalescents and old people, the presence of AFM1 in commercial milk and dairy products is a matter of concern (6). Therefore, CODEX recommends the establishment of maximum residue limit for AFM1 of 0.5 mg/kg (7). AFM1 is relatively stable throughout pasteurization, sterilization, preparation and storage of various dairy products (8). Milk is not only consumed in liquid form but also used for the preparation of infant formulas, yogurt and cheese. Infants in Iran usually consume pasteurized and sterilized milk after breast weaning and up to 3 years of age as the main source of food, so the problem is most important in this age group (6). Therefore, it is important to determine AFM1 level in milk and dairy products in order to inform consumers of its potential hazard. There is little information on the basic diet, including milk and milk products as well as AFM1concentrations in milk, in some cities of Iran (9). The aim of this survey was to determine concentrations of AFM1 in raw and pasteurized milk marketed in Jahrom city located in southern of Iran during two seasons. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total 120 milk samples including 90 raw milk samples and 30 pasteurized milk samples were randomly collected from supermarkets in Jahrom (a southern city in Iran), Jan. 2013 to jun. 2013. Of these, 90 samples were raw milk and 30 samples were pasteurized milk .All of the samples were transported at 2–4 °C in the icebox to the laboratory. The milk samples were centrifuged at 3500g for 10 min at 10 °C. The upper creamy layer was removed by Pasteur pipette for testing. The quantitative analysis of AFM1 in samples was performed by competitive ELISA using commercial AFM1 test kit (R-Bio pharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany). According to Iranian national standard and accentuated by European Union (EU) and codex Alimentarious Commission, (European Commission (EC), the presence of AFM1 level more

472

Jokull Journal

Vol 65, No. 2;Feb 2015

than 50 ng/l in milk, considered as positive and less than 50 ng/l considered as negative for AFM1 (7). The results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and considered statistically difference at 95% confidence levels. RESULTS The result of analyses of AFM1 level showed that 10 milk samples (8.33%) including 6 samples (6.7%) of raw milk and 4 samples (13.3%) of pasteurized milk were contaminated with AFM1 with higher than the maximum tolerance level of AFM1 in liquid milk according to Iranian national standard and accentuated by European Union (EU), codex Alimentarious Commission (50 ng/l) and European Commission (EC), (7). There was not found significant difference between the level of AFM1 in raw and pasteurized milk samples (P>0.05) (Fig. 1). AFM1 contamination in the milks was seen the winter and there was not seen this contamination in spring season (p0.05). There are few literature data on the occurrence of AFM1 levels in milk and milk products in Iran (6, 9, 10, 11, 12). In comparison with those found in other Iranian cities the contamination which has been found in present study is lower than those found in Gorgan (76 ng/l) and Tehran (61 ng/l) but is higher than those found in Hamedan (8 ng/l), Rasht (44 ng/l), Shiraz (52 ng/l) (9, 10, 11, 12). Our results about the contamination of pasteurized milk with AFM1 and about raw milk are in agreement Shiraz (southern city of Iran) 17.8% (12) and with the result of study in Urmia (north-west city of Iran) 6.25% (10). AFM1 levels in samples of milk produced in Argentina were found to be very low and in no case did the levels exceed the recommended limits for milk products (0.05 μg/l) (13). The incidence of AFM1 contamination in raw milk analyzed in Portugal was 80.6%, including: 54.8% contained 0.005-0.010 μg/l, 6.5% had 0.011-0.02 μg/l and 19.3% contained 0.0210.050 μg/l (14). The AFM1 milk contamination in Ankara, Turkey, was reported 88.23%, of which 36% were contaminated with concentrations less than 50 ng/l and 64% exceeded the legal level of AFM1 in milk (15). During 2005, out of 45 raw milk samples analyzed in Italy, only one sample was positive to the ELISA test, but the confirmation test values (0.035 μg/l) were below the legal limit (16). AFM1 contamination of milk is the result of cows feeding on material containing AFB1. The concentration of this mycotoxin in animal feed stuffs is influenced by the type, the time and method of harvesting and temperature and relative humidity of storage facilities, all of which vary among different regions of Iran (9). In present study, AFM1 concentrations in milk samples were significantly higher in the colder seasons in agreement with the results of other authors. For example Tajkarimi reported that AFM1 concentrations in milk samples in winter were significantly higher than summer (P50 ng/l; however, in summer 16% of samples were >50 ng/l (17), because milking animals are fed with compound feeds in winter that are prone to AFB1 contamination (2). In order to achieve a low level of AFM1, it is essential to conduct

474

Jokull Journal

Vol 65, No. 2;Feb 2015

training programs for producers about the toxicity potential of aflatoxins, reduce the concentration of AFB1 in animal feed by good manufacturing and storage and integrating it with Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) based safety program and doing regular monitoring of milk and milk products (18). Concentrations of AFM1 in milk found in the present study are similar to those reported in other countries, especially those in Asian and Africa, although higher than those in many European countries (19). CONCLUSION The results indicated that the contamination of the kinds of milk in such level could be a serious public health problem. AFM1 concentration of milk and its products is potentially a serious public health problem for all age groups. For this reason, milk and dairy products should be inspected and controlled continuously for AFM1 contamination. Where concentrations are unacceptably high, careful investigation of feed stuffs for contamination by AFB1 are recommended. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Hereby, the authors acknowledge the authorities of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences for financial support. Also authors thank all participants for their enrollment in this study.

REFFRENCES 1. van Egmond, H.P. 1991. Mycotoxins. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation, Special Issue. 9 (101), 131-145. 2. Hussain, I.and J. Anwar. 2008. A study on contamination of aflatoxin M1in raw milk in the Punjab province of Pakistan.Food Control. 19, 393-395. 3. Duraković,S.,Duraković,L.Vahčić,N.,Skelin,A.,Duraković,Z. 2008. Effect of moulds growth in mixed Cultures on production of aflatoxins on maize hybrid. Cereal Research Communications 36 (Part3,Supple-ment5),1615-1618. 4. Vagef, R. Mahmoudi, R. 2013. Occurrence of Aflatoxin M1 in raw and pasteurized milk produced in west region of Iran (during summer and winter), International Food Research Journal 20 (3): 1421-1425. 5. FAO/WHO,1999. Fortyninth report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee of Food Additives: Evaluation of Certain Food Additive and Contaminations. WHO Technical report Series, 884, 69-77. 6. Oveisi, M.R., B. Jannat, N. Sadeghi,M. Hajimahmoodi and A. Nikzad, 2007. Presence of aflatoxin M1 in milk and infant milk products inTehran, Iran. Food Control, 18: 1216-1218.

475

Jokull Journal

Vol 65, No. 2;Feb 2015

7. Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2001. Comment submitted on the draft maximum level for aflatoxin M1in milk. In Codexcommittee onfood additives andcontaminants 33rd session.Hauge, The Netherlands. 8. Fallah, A. A., 2010. Aflatoxin M1 contamination European Commission Regulation, No 466/2001/EC of 8 March 2001, setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in food stuffs. Official Journal of the European Commission Lo77: 2001;1-13. 9.Tajkarimi, M., F. Shojaee Aliabadi, M. Salah Nejad, H. Pursoltani, A.A. Motallebi and H.Mahdavi, 2007. Seasonal study of aflatoxin M1 contamination in milk in five regions in Iran. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 116, 346-349. 10.Tajik, H.S., M.R. Rohani and M. Moradi, 2007. Detection of Anatoxin Ml in Raw and Commercial Pasteurized Milk in Urmia, Iran. Pakistan J. Biological Sci., 10: 4103-4107. 11. Kamkar, A. 2005. A study on the occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in raw milk produced in Sarab city of Iran. Food Control 16: 593–599. 12. Alborzi, S., Pourabbas, B., Rashidi, M. and Astaneh, B. 2006. Aflatoxin M1 contamination in pasteurized milk in Shiraz. Food Control 17: 582–584. 13. Lopez, C.E., L.L. Ramos, S.S. Ramadan and L.C.Bulacio, 2003. Presence of aflatoxin M1 in milk for human consumption Argentina.Food Control, 14, 31-34. 14. MARTIN, M. L., H. M. MARTIN. 2000. Aflatoxin M1 in raw and ultra high temperature treated milk commercialised in Portugal. Food Addit. Contam. 17, 871-874. 15. Çelik T., Sarımehmetoğlu B. 2005. Aflatoxin M1 contamination in pasteurised milk, VETERINARSKI ARHIV. 75 (1), 57-65. 16. Decastelli, L.; Lai, J.; Gramaglia, M.; Monaco, A.; Nachtmann, C.; Oldano, F.; Ruffer, M.;Sezian, A.; Bandirola, C. 2007. Aflatoxins occurrence in milk and feed in Northern Italy during 2004–2005. Food Control, No. 18, pp. (1263–1266). 17. Tajkarimi M., Aliabadi-Sh F.2008. Aflatoxin M1 contamination in winter and summer milk in 14 states in Iran, Food Contro.l 19, 1033–1036. 18. Dairy HACCP - Evaluation, NCIMS HACCP Pilot Program Phase II Expansion, National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments (NCIMS). 2003. Return to Dairy Grade A Voluntary HACCP,,April 17. 19. Wood, G.E., and M.W. Trucksess. 1998. Regulatory control programs for mycotoxincontaminated food. Pages 459-451. In: Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food Safety (Sinha, K.K., and D. Bhatnagar, eds.), Markel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.

476

Jokull Journal