Evidence from a tactile discrimination task References

0 downloads 0 Views 644KB Size Report
F1 = [21:31]Hz, F2 = F1 +/- 2Hz. ○ Context-setting phases. 0. 50. 100. Exp 1. Exp 2. Mean accuracy (%. ) 0. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. Exp 1. Exp 2. Senso ry precision π.
Atypical prior construction and adjustment in autism: Evidence from a tactile discrimination task

Laurie-Anne Sapey-Triomphe1, Sandrine Sonié1,2,3, Jérémie Mattout1, Christina Schmitz1 1. Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre, Brain dynamics and Cognition team, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. 2. Centre de Ressource Autisme Rhône-Alpes, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France. 3. Hôpital Saint-Jean-de-Dieu, Lyon, France.

Introduction Probability density

● Perception results from the interplay between incoming sensory information and prior knowledge.

100

● In Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), it was suggested that many atypical behaviors could emerge from difficulties to build up and adapt priors1-5. As compared to neurotypicals (NT), they were hypothesized to have: - Hypo-priors (low precision of priors) 1 - High sensory precision 2 - High and inflexible precision of the prediction error (HIPPEA hypothesis) 3

Posterior

50

Prior

Likelihood

0

Prediction error

⪧ How do individuals with ASD learn and adjust their priors?

Stimulus feature

Methods ● Experimental design and time-order effect: 1st

● Experiment 1: Stable context

2nd

stimulation F2 = F1 +/- 2Hz

stimulation F1

- + 500ms

2000ms

Participants: 17 NT adults 16 ASD adults

Was F2 higher or lower than F1?

500ms

F1 F2

Fmean

Participants: 20 NT adults 17 ASD adults

F2>F1 ⇨ Easier: better & faster

F2 F1

Prior Fmean

Context setting at 30Hz F1 = 30Hz, F2 = [22:38]Hz

TOE assessment at 26Hz F1 = [21:31]Hz, F2 = F1 +/- 2Hz

● Computational model We used a perceptual decision model to investigate the evolution of the prior mean frequency in each group. Model parameters: input frequencies F1 and F2, sensory precision πS, prior mean frequency, 𝜋𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝜸: TOE parameter, function of

F2

F1

TOE assessment at 30Hz F1 = [25:35]Hz, F2 = F1 +/- 2Hz

● Experiment 2: Changing context

 Can elicit a time-order effect, reflecting the effect of priors: Prior

Context setting at 30Hz F1 = 30Hz, F2 = [22:38]Hz

F2F1 F2F1 F2F1 F2F1 F2