American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010 ; vol(130) :
582-93. 3. Mir CF, Ayeh A, Goswani A, Charkhandeh S. Skeletal and Dental ...
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Pancherz H, Ruf S. The Herbst Appliance Research-based Clinical Management. Chicago : Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd, 2008 : 11. 2. VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst Appliance : A Cephalometric and tomographic investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010 ; vol(130) : 582-93. 3. Mir CF, Ayeh A, Goswani A, Charkhandeh S. Skeletal and Dental Changes in Class II Division 1 Malocclusions Treated with Splint-Type Herbst Appliances. Angle Orthodontist 2007: vol (77) : 376-81. 4. Omblus J, Malmgren O, Pancherz H. Long Term Effects of Class II Correction in Herbst and Bass Therapy. European Journal of Orthodontics 1997: vol (19) : 185-93. 5. Mcsherry PF, Dent B, Bradley H. Class-II Correction-Reducing Patient Compliance: a Review of the Available Techniques. Journal of Orthodontist 2000 ; vol(27) : 219-25. 6. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic Treatment of The Class II Noncompliant Patient. London : Mosby Elsevier, 2006:37-42. 7. Nedeljković N, Živojinović V, Ivanović M. Clinical Effects of Fixed Functional Herbst Appliance in the Treatment of Class II/1 Malocclusion. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2009 : vol (137) : 675-80. 8. Bishara SE. Textbook of Orthodontics. Philadelphia : Elsevier, 2001:103.
9. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics: The Art and Science. Aryamedi Publishing : New Delhi, 1997: 75-80 , 374-6. 10. Echarri P. Treatment of Class II Malocclusions. Barcelona : Ladent Formacion, 2010:8-9. 11. Scheid RC. Dental Anatomy Its Revelance to Dentistry. Maryland : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007:360. 12. Pancherz H, Fischer S. Amount and Direction of Temporomandibular Joint Growth
Changes
in
Herbst
Treatment:
A
Cephalometric
Long-Term
Investigation. Angle Orthodontist 2003 ; vol (73) : 493-501. 13. Manfredi C, Cimino R, Trani A, Pancherz H. Skeletal Changes of Herbst Appliance Therapy Investigated With More Conventional Cephalometrics and European Norms. Angle Orthodontist 2001: vol (71) : 170-6. 14. Hagglund P, Segerdal S, Forsberg CM. The integrated Herbst Appliance – treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group. European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 ; vol(30) : 120-7. 15. Bock N, Ruf S. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst Appliance. European Journal of Orthodontics 2008 ; vol(30) : 606-13. 16. Bock N, Ruf S. Occlusal stability of adult Class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst Appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010 ; vol(138) : 146-51.
17. Phan KLD, Bendeus M, Hagg U. Comparison of The Headgear Activator and Herbst Appliance – Effects and Post-Treatment Changes. European Journal of Orthodontics 2006: vol (28) : 594-604. 18. Pancherz H. The Herbst Appliance: A Paradigm Change in Class II Treatment. World Champion Lecture 2005 : 8-10. 19. Du X, Hagg U, M.Rabie AB. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-bystep advancement versus conventional Herbst Appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. European Journal of Orthodontics 2002 ; vol(24) : 167-74. 20. Rodrigues M, Fernando J, McNamara JA. Short-Term Treatment Effects Produced by the Herbst Appliance in the Mixed Dentition. Angle Orthodontist 2005 ; vol(75) : 540-7. 21. Anonymous. Herbst Applinace Refrence Manual. Atlanta : Specialty Appliances Orthodontics Laboratory, 1998:6. 22. Maia S, Raveli DB. Computed Tomographic evaluation of a young adult treated with the Herbst Appliance. Dental Press J Orthod 2010 ; vol(15) : 130-6.
