Full Text - The Law Society of Saskatchewan

5 downloads 37 Views 172KB Size Report
Ma'Ss~Y F~i:gUBOn' v; Gover.nment of Saskatchewan. ( unreported) (SCA) ... B.C. Lightweight !\ggregate v. 'canada ... O'Sullivan v. Turk (1947) 1 ~1.\q.R •.
EXAMINATIONS FOR DISCOVERY

BY

.

I

WILLIAM N.

)

LA~ITON,

Q.C.

EXl\MJNATIONS FOR DISCXlVERY Tw:J valuable steps in civil proceeding are Discovery of,

"1.

.,!

r:ocunents and Examina.tion for Discovery.·,' If l:bth -are properly' handled, ,Counsel can go to trial mewing": the-,other party's case, knowing the other party.! s docunents am, to a certain extent, krx:>w,

in;J the other party.

Discovery starts with good pleadings.

',',

Pleadings establish the ':

facts in issue; evidence "hich has a

'.

.

\

t~ency.:in

reason to logically

prove a fact which is in issue is relevant; only rele:vant: ,avj.dence is

admissible.

r

The documents to be disc1ot;sed are only, those "relating

to the matter __ in\ question".

In; a disoovety 'questionin;r is limited .! -,'

!,'

to the clabn or defence raised b¥ the pleadings or to establishing

",-

.

"

,

a fact in issue.

(i'

The PUrpOse. of 'Discovery

-

"'.'

'-

(1)

To 'kr¥:M\ the case one ·has to,meet; :

(2)

TO lead to settlement;

(3)

TO obtain material to discredit the witness by previous

,

'-"

,

contradictory statements; "

(4)

: : (

;) L

"'f"

',':,\: i"

To gain admissions. ,

.

SUGGESTED READrnG

L

..

Saskatchewan Rules of Court Re:

212~221

[)ocunentsl' Rules (;

Re:

.0

..•• ,-I

(

Oral Disoov9J:Y, Rules 222-240 ~ J :'

2.

.

OJ;

,I

I

I

':, r : ,.' • ' '

Anmtated Rules of Court of Queen's Bench - B. llOurke, 1976

3.

, Discovery in C'anada - G. E. Choate, Carswell, -1977"'

4.

The Law of civil Procedure - WilliSton arrl Rolls, Veil. 2, Chap.

,

"

16, Butterworth's, 1970

' " " '_,);'

"" n

'. ,:;,

(

SCOPE IN OlNSTlTUTIONAL C.ASES

\1

Ma'Ss~Y F~i:gUBOn' v; Gover.nment of Saskatchewan (unreported) (SCA) S~'SEQuENT

ACI'S "

,_1_ '(

C.P.R. v. Calgary (1967), 58 W.W.R. 124 (ACA) :; ,3ll (1935), 2 W.W.R.

I

(MKB)

In

(SCA)

,i-

",

Edmonton v. W. W•. Sales ·(1941)2 W.W.R. 328 (ABC)

.,

v. Burnett and Bull-ook (1938) l,w.W,R. ;, ,.

INl\DVERTllNT Ar:MISSIONS

, . .-

Chechik v. Bronfman (1924),2 W.W.R.1165

GWin

'- 1

'

(SCA) i

,1'

1IALI,

"

v. Starrs (1929), 3 W.W.R. 704

JUST EXCEPI'IONS" , ' .,.,'

-)i

Freanan v. Allied Collection Agencies" (1965),' 51 W.W.R. 255 i .' • EXPLANATORY PARTS

Sask. Co-op Wheat PrOdUcers v.Luciuk" (1931)-,,2 ):I.W.R. 51 (SCA) -

J

7

WI'1\lDRAWING QUESTIONS

, Kirkby v. Booth (1964), 1 O.R. 286

ROLE 240 "casTS OF EXAMlNA~IONS FOR DlSOOVERY"

Kbshman v. Koshman, 27 R.F.L. 249 (SOE) :H:::(J//",-,m=-.::CD:::ND=U:::C!'",.-,AN=.!:EXAMINl\==,-,T"I",O::.N:...:.FO:::R~D:=I:::SCOVE==RY" .

PREPARE:YOoR CLIENT,' ,'f

~.;

: (.'

I'

I/

Tell him'''the'atmosphere will be infonna!, 'that you

will be there an:! that he will not be barrassed. to concentrate on the questions am

and to be

("

tO~

trf.l'thfbl\!~hTel1'ihim

Tell hlm

anSwers, to be, deliberate

hot ,to dodge questions, oot

be' argumentative. 'ciIXJ. not to volunteer ·info:r:mation.

PREPAllE( YOURSELF :; ~. "'..".):£ you rananber being asked this question? ,·Do' you rememl::er givim this answer?"

If the answer on discOvery supports

your case and if the witness agrees that he was asked' .the question an:1 gave the answer, you should then ask him "Was the answer On

)

r', ,

9

di~e:ry .~~?"

,siWple, clear,

It is iml::'?rtant that the questions t:e

~~guous. ':

'

If a. good answer is received ask the party "Is what you have given your considered response to the question? 'lsI there anythi.ng ,you ,"-Duld like to add to what you just said?"

If a series of examinations are held at the same time and you are asking questions after an initial examination has ,l:'i

.

taken place, you should ask tlIs it agreed that you have been SM:lm and are still under oath?

Is it agreed that the plaintiff

(carrpany) is tourd by the questions a~ke9 am the answers given in( the' examination just o::::mpleted' in the same !'lanner as if I

had put those questions to you?

am

Is it agreed that the questions

answers of your examination will apply to all parties?tl

)

,I:

".

, ,', . !,i ,,",-

.

,-

-",(,_

;1'1'- .,-, ' • ,) .

•! "

;

-, ,; : :' . (\

>'

10

J