Research Notes 1135
RESEARCH NOTE Genotypic diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a Bulgarian hospital R. Dobrewski1, E. Savov1, A. T. Bernards2, M. van den Barselaar3, P. Nordmann4, P. J. van den Broek3 and L. Dijkshoorn3 1
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Military Medical Academy, Sophia, Bulgaria, 2Department of Medical Microbiology, 3Department of Infectious Diseases, Centre of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands and 4Department of Bacteriology-Virology, Hoˆpital de Biceˆtre, Le-KremlinBiceˆtre, France
ABSTRACT A set of 18 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, collected prospectively in a Bulgarian hospital during episodes of increased A. baumannii occurrence during 2000–2002, was investigated for genotypic diversity and antibiotic susceptibility. Four genotypes were identified by amplified fragment length polymorphism genomic fingerprinting, one of which (type 1) accounted for 13 isolates, indicating that a specific strain was predominant. The single isolate allocated to type 2 was identified to European clone I. All isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics, but most retained susceptibility to tobramycin and colistin, and all except one were susceptible to imipenem. Keywords Acinetobacter baumannii, AFLP typing, antibiotic susceptibility, Bulgaria, genotypes, nosocomal infection Original Submission: 9 December 2005; Revised Submission: 1 March 2006; Accepted: 9 April 2006
Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12: 1135–1137 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01530.x
Corresponding author and reprint requests: L. Dijkshoorn, Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands E-mail: L.
[email protected]
Most reports of multiresistant endemic or epidemic Acinetobacter baumannii are from western European countries, and information concerning this organism in central and eastern Europe is scarce. A. baumannii has been endemic in the hospital of the Military Medical Academy (MMA), Sophia, Bulgaria since the early 1990s. The present report investigated a set of A. baumannii isolates, collected prospectively in the MMA hospital during 2000–2002, for genotypic relatedness and susceptibility to antibiotics. The aims of the study were to determine whether a single strain predominated in the hospital during the collection period, and whether the isolates were related to clones I–III found in hospital outbreaks in several other European countries [1–3]. The MMA is a 500-bed university hospital for military personnel and civilians. It is a referral hospital that provides acute medical and surgical care, but not for paediatrics, obstetrics and burns patients. The hospital has two intensive care units, i.e., a 20-bed medical unit and a 16-bed surgical unit. Many patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit are emergency cases with poly-trauma following car accidents or gunshot wounds. The hospital employs an infection control doctor and an infection control nurse, who both participate in the infection control committee of the hospital. The occurrence of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter has increased steadily since the early 1990s, with recurrent clusters of cases, especially in the two intensive care units [4]. Control measures during such epidemic episodes usually include isolation of patients, as well as disinfection of the environment and surgical instruments on wards. Antibiotics for treatment of patients with infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. include imipenem, and amikacin plus ampicillin–sulbactam. In total, 18 multidrug-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter spp. from 18 patients were investigated (Table 1). These isolates were selected from among 65 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter isolates recovered during documented episodes of increased occurrence during 2000–2002. The isolates were selected to represent presumptive cases of cross-infection, based on their antibiotic susceptibility profile and their origin in time and space. Most isolates were from multi-trauma patients, i.e., a group susceptible to colonisation with A. baumannii [5]. The organisms were iden-
2006 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 12, 1131–1146
1136 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 12 Number 11, November 2006
Isolate
Patient
Date of isolation (day/month/year)
LUH8587 LUH8588 LUH8589 LUH8590 LUH8591 LUH8592 LUH8595 LUH8597 LUH8598 LUH8599 LUH8600 LUH8601 LUH8602 LUH8603 LUH8604 LUH8605 LUH8606 LUH8607
LP AP MA KR VS LI NV LD RN AD VT PP SS EA PJ AD BB AA
30 ⁄ 06 ⁄ 00 02 ⁄ 11 ⁄ 00 24 ⁄ 11 ⁄ 00 25 ⁄ 11 ⁄ 00 04 ⁄ 09 ⁄ 01 24 ⁄ 09 ⁄ 01 15 ⁄ 11 ⁄ 01 23 ⁄ 11 ⁄ 01 23 ⁄ 11 ⁄ 01 27 ⁄ 12 ⁄ 01 08 ⁄ 01 ⁄ 02 18 ⁄ 01 ⁄ 02 31 ⁄ 01 ⁄ 02 16 ⁄ 08 ⁄ 02 23 ⁄ 08 ⁄ 02 23 ⁄ 08 ⁄ 02 02 ⁄ 09 ⁄ 02 02 ⁄ 09 ⁄ 02
Warda Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Traum. Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Uro. Haem. Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Surg. ICU Med. ICU Med. ICU
Specimenb
Underlying conditionc
AFLP typed
SW CC BA BA SW UR BL BL BA BA UR UR BA UR.CATH. SW SW BA BA
Abd. abscess Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Trauma Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Poly-trauma URP Myeloma Contusio cerebri Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Poly-trauma Insultus cerebri Insultus cerebri
1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 1 3 4 3
Table 1. Data for Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from recurrent epidemic episodes in the Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria during 2000–2002
a
Surg., surgical; Traum., traumatology; Uro., urology; Haem., haematology, Med., medical. SW, surgical wound; CC, central catheter; BA, bronchial aspirate; UR, urine; BL, blood; UR.CATH., urine catheter. Abd., abdominal; URP, trans-urethral resection of prostate gland. d Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) type as shown in the dendrogram of Fig. 1. b c
tified initially to the genus Acinetobacter using the automated Mini API System with ID32 strips (bioMe´rieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and were then identified to the species level by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis [6] and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprint analysis [7]. Electrophoretic fragment separation and data capture were performed with the ALF express instrument (Amersham Biosciences, Roosendaal, The Netherlands). For final species identification, the AFLP profiles were grouped with those of strains of described genomic species in the Leiden AFLP library with BioNumerics software v.3.5 (Applied Maths, St Martens-Latem, Belgium). Isolates grouping at ‡50% similarity were considered to belong to the same species [7], while those that clustered at ‡82% and ‡90% similarity were considered to belong to the same clone or strain, respectively [2,8]. All 18 isolates were identified as A. baumannii by both amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis and AFLP analysis. At a clustering level of 90%, the dendrogram of the AFLP fingerprints comprised one cluster with 13 isolates (type 1), including two isolates with one extra fragment of c. 250 bp, one cluster with three isolates (type 4), and two single isolates (type 2 and type 3) (Fig. 1, Table 1). The linkage of the 13 type 1 isolates at 94% in one main cluster indicated that one particular strain predominated among the isolates. Isolate LUH8592 (type 2) was identified as European clone I, as it clustered at >82% with
reference strains of this clone (data not shown), but none of the other isolates corresponded to European clones I–III [1–3]. All isolates were tested routinely for antimicrobial susceptibility using the ATB-PSE 5 strip of the Mini API system (bioMe´rieux). Screening for extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs) was performed with the ATB-BLSE strip. Sixteen of the 18 isolates were resistant or intermediatelyresistant to piperacillin, piperacillin–clavulanate, ceftazidime, aztreonam, gentamicin, netilmycin, fosfomycin, pefloxacin and ciprofoxacin, but most isolates were susceptible to ticarcillin (n = 11), tobramycin (n = 11), colistin (n = 15) and imipenem (n = 17). Based on the MICs of expandedspectrum cephalosporins and use of the ATB-BLSE strip, the isolates were considered to be possible ESBL producers. To further investigate susceptibilities, a sub-set of six isolates that represented the different genotypes identified (LUH8604, LUH8605, LUH8600, LUH8599, LUH8592 and LUH8590; Table 1) was tested by the Vitek 2 system (bioMe´rieux) with the AST-N020 card. Vitek-derived MICs (mg ⁄ L) were 8 to ‡32 for ampicillin–clavulanic acid, 16 to ‡64 for ceftazidime, 0.5 to 2 for meropenem, £1 to ‡16 for tobramycin, and ‡4 for ciprofloxacin. None of the isolates produced a clavulanic acid-inhibited ESBL when tested by reference methods [9], or a metallo-enzyme, and the blaVEB and blaPER genes were not detected by PCR. The contradictory results concerning ESBL detection may be explained by the fact that the
2006 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 12, 1131–1146
Research Notes 1137
1
2 3
4
100
95
90
85
80
Pearson correlation (Opt:0.10%) [4.0%-97.0%] AFLP
LUH08595
15-11-01 Surg ICU
LUH08598
23-11-01 Surg ICU
LUH08601
18-01-02 UR
LUH08602
31-01-02 BA
LUH08603
16-08-02 Surg ICU
LUH08604
23-08-02 Surg ICU
LUH08589
24-11-00 Surg ICU
LUH08591
04-09-01 Traum
LUH08587
30-06-00 Surg ICU
LUH08588
02-11-00 Surg ICU
LUH08597
23-11-01 Surg ICU
LUH08590
25-11-00 Surg ICU
LUH08607
02-09-02 Med ICU
LUH08592
24-09-01 Surg ICU
LUH08605
23-08-02 Surg ICU
LUH08599
27-12-01 Surg ICU
LUH08600
08-01-02 Uro
LUH08606
02-09-02 BA
Fig. 1. Dendrogram showing cluster analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprints for the 18 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates included in the study. The dotted line at 90% marks the level above which individual strains are delineated. Surg, surgical; ICU, intensive care unit; UR, urine; BA, bronchial aspirate; Traum, traumatology; Med, medical; Uro, urology.
ATB-BLSE strips contain sulbactam as an inhibitor, and this antibiotic has intrinsic activity against acinetobacters [10]. For this reason, the ATB-BLSE strip is not useful for detection of ESBL activity in A. baumannii. The present report indicates that several multidrug-resistant strains, as distinguished by AFLP analysis, were present in the MMA during the study period, with one strain being predominant. Except for one isolate identified to European clone I, none of the isolates belonged to the widespread European clones I–III [1–3]. This raises the question of whether the evolution to antibiotic resistance has occurred in these organisms independently from other A. baumannii strains in Europe. Further to the present report from Bulgaria, multidrug-resistant A. baumannii
isolates have been reported in other central ⁄ eastern European countries [2,8]. With the recent expansion of the European Union, and the expected increase in travel between eastern and western Europe, it is important to establish systems for monitoring the occurrence of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii in the new EU member states. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS T. van der Reijden is gratefully acknowledged for excellent technical support.
REFERENCES 1. Dijkshoorn L, Aucken H, Gerner-Smidt P et al. Comparison of outbreak and nonoutbreak Acinetobacter baumannii strains by genotypic and phenotypic methods. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 1519–1525. 2. Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, van der Reijden TJ. Long-term predominance of two pan-European clones among multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains in the Czech Republic. J Med Microbiol 2004; 53: 147–153. 3. Van Dessel H, Dijkshoorn L, van der Reijden T et al. Identification of a new geographically widespread multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii clone from European hospitals. Res Microbiol 2004; 155: 105–112. 4. Savov E, Chankova D, Vatcheva R, Dinev N. In vitro investigation of the susceptibility of A. baumannii strains isolated from clinical specimens to ampicillin ⁄ sulbactam alone and in combination with amikacin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002; 20: 390–392. 5. El Shafie SS, Alishaq M, Leni Garcia M. Investigation of an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in trauma intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56: 101–105. 6. Dijkshoorn L, Van Harsselaar B, Tjernberg I, Bouvet PJ, Vaneechoutte M. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis for identification of Acinetobacter genomic species. Syst Appl Microbiol 1998; 21: 33–39. 7. Nemec A, De Baere T, Tjernberg I, Vaneechoutte M, van der Reijden TJ, Dijkshoorn L. Acinetobacter ursingii sp. nov. and Acinetobacter schindleri sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51: 1891– 1899. 8. Wroblewska MM, Dijkshoorn L, Marchel H et al. Outbreak of nosocomial meningitis caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in neurosurgical patients. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57: 300– 307. 9. Poirel L, Menuteau O, Agoli N, Cattoen C, Nordmann P. Outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase VEB-1producing isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in a French hospital. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 3542–3547. 10. Vahaboglu H, Ozturk R, Aygun G et al. Widespread detection of PER-1-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among nosocomial Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Turkey: a nationwide multicenter study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41: 2265–2269.
2006 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 12, 1131–1146