Geopolitics and Strategic Management in the Global Economy Angelo Presenza University of Molise, Italy Lorn R. Sheehan Dalhousie University, Canada
A volume in the Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage (ABSCA) Book Series
Published in the United States of America by IGI Global Business Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global) 701 E. Chocolate Avenue Hershey PA, USA 17033 Tel: 717-533-8845 Fax: 717-533-8661 E-mail:
[email protected] Web site: http://www.igi-global.com Copyright © 2018 by IGI Global. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or distributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without written permission from the publisher. Product or company names used in this set are for identification purposes only. Inclusion of the names of the products or companies does not indicate a claim of ownership by IGI Global of the trademark or registered trademark. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Presenza, Angelo, 1975- editor. | Sheehan, Lorn R., 1964- editor. Title: Geopolitics and strategic management in the global economy / Angelo Presenza and Lorn R. Sheehan, editors. Description: Hershey, PA : Business Science Reference, [2018] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017008229| ISBN 9781522526735 (hardcover) | ISBN 9781522526742 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Strategic planning. | International business enterprises--Management. Classification: LCC HD30.28 .G45 2018 | DDC 658.4/012--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017008229 This book is published in the IGI Global book series Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage (ABSCA) (ISSN: 2327-3429; eISSN: 2327-3437)
British Cataloguing in Publication Data A Cataloguing in Publication record for this book is available from the British Library. All work contributed to this book is new, previously-unpublished material. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors, but not necessarily of the publisher. For electronic access to this publication, please contact:
[email protected].
170
Chapter 9
Project and Risk Management in a Global Context: The Importance of Cultural Risk Mirko Perano Reald University of Vlore (ASAR), Albania Bice Della Piana University of Salerno, Italy Gian Luca Casali Queensland University of Technology, Australia
ABSTRACT Project management is one of the possible ways to improve the organizational reputation and create value. The control achievable on each project’ constrains (time, cost and quality) and the actions consequent by assessment process can represent in theory a guarantee for the success of a project. In practical, there are many risks capable of upsetting the project dynamics leading to failures. Risk management, or the specific area of knowledge of Project Risk Management, are useful to prevent this possible occurrence. The global dimension of organizations’ networks that use PM, moves this quality to the project that this organizations do. A definition of global project is provided as well as also the consequent considerations about the cross-cultural aspect within the peoples involved in this type of project. It is framed and proposed a new category of risk related to management of global project: cultural risk analysis.
INTRODUCTION Project management is a useful discipline that among other things can reduce the project complexity and, maximize the knowledge and control on each activities. What makes the process complex is the fact that each activity is under the constraints of three important variables: costs, time and quality. Through the evolution of project management (PM), knowledge and models have moved continuously between conceptual and empirical research. Under the social point of view, “projects are complex social settings DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2673-5.ch009
Copyright © 2018, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
Project and Risk Management in a Global Context
CONCLUSION The management of global project require particular attention in order to control the complexity deriving from the global reach of the project. According to Laszlo (1994), Thomas (2000), Hodgson, Cicmil (2000), the model of PM is not quite adequate to manage, with tools and actual techniques, the actual project complexity. Many complicated projects are managed with inadequate tools, methods and techniques (in terms of scale, heterogeneity, etc…) or only have ambiguous goals. It is simple to think that this projects shortly will become complex. Around the topic of project complexity scholars put attention in order to catch (often with a quantitative analysis) the project complexity factors. A lot of this research constitute the base of knowledge of this work. The definition of global project/program, characterized by team members from different cultures and languages that working in different nations around the globe, raises a need to have a comprehension of a new aspect that can help to better investigate the project complexity. Starting from this definition of global project and also consider the project dimension and cross cultural as project complexity factors bring to a conclusion that cross cultural project can be consider as a project complexity factor and can constitute a single risk that should be considered in the area of PRM. The cross cultural project risk analysis can support to manage project in global context, or manage global project with a different level of complexity or risk and it can help to achieve better the primary project objective in terms of costs, time and quality.
REFERENCES Adler, N. J., & Gundersen, A. (2008). International dimensions of organizational behavior (5th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education. Anderson, B., & Fagenhaug, T. (2000). RCA: Simplified tool and techniques. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press. Archibald, R. D. (2004). Project Management: la gestione di progetti e programmi complessi. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli. Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity – a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3 Bassi, A. (Ed.). (2007). Gestire l’innovazione nelle PMI. Il project management come competenza manageriale. Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli. Binder, J. (2016). Global Project Management. Communication, Collaboration and Management Across Boarders. New York: Routledge. Black, J. S. (1987). Japanese/American negotiations: The Japanese perspective. Business and Economic Review, 6(1), 27–30. Black, J. S., & Mendenhall, M. (1990). Cross-Cultural Training Effectiveness: A Review and a Theoretical Framework for Future. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 113–136.
189
Project and Risk Management in a Global Context
Branger, N., & Schlag, C. (2004). Model Risk: A Conceptual Framework for Risk Measurement and Hedging. Retrieved October, 15, 2016, from https://www.wiwi.uni-muenster.de/fcm/downloads / forschen/2004_Model_Risk.pdf Capaldo, A., Della Piana, B., Monteleone, M., & Sergi, B. (2012). Cross-Cultural Management: A Mosaic of Words and Concepts. Milano, Italy: McGrawHill. Capaldo, A., Della Piana, B., & Vecchi, A. (2012). Managing across cultures in a globalized world. Findings from a systematic literature review. In The Global Community (Vol. 1, pp. 7–40). New York: Oxford University Press. Chu, D., Strand, R., & Fjelland, R. (2003). Theories of complexity – Common denominators of complex systems. Essays & Commentaries. Complexity, 8(3), 19–30. doi:10.1002/cplx.10059 Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J., & Hodgson, D. (2006). Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675–686. doi:10.1016/j. ijproman.2006.08.006 Committee of Sponsoring Organization (CoSo). (2004). Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework. New York: COSO. Crtistoph, A. J., & Konrad, S. (2014). Project Complexity as an Influence Factor on the Balance of Costs and Benefits in Project Management Maturity Modeling. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119(March), 162–171. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.020 Della Piana, B., & Testa, M. (2009). L’efficacia dei processi di negoziazione crosscultural nei business internazionali. Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 235(1), 2–21. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Ferrer Paccess, F. M. (1974). I sistemi d’impresa. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino. Gatti, M., Della Piana, B., & Testa, M. (2008). Cross-cultural practices in international negotiation process. The Alenia Aeronautica case. EIASM Proceedings on 5th Workshop on International strategy and cross-cultural management. Instanbul, Turkey: KOC University. Gaudenzi, B. (2006). Nuovi approcci di gestione dei rischi d’impresa: Verso l’integrazione tra imprenditore e management. Sinergie: Italian Journal of Management, 71(Sep), 221–243. Graham, J. (1985). The influence of culture on the process of business negotiations, an exploratory study. Journal of International Business Studies, 16(1), 81–96. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490443 Graham, J. L., Mintu, A. T., & Rodgers, W. (1994). Explorations of Negotiation Behaviors in Ten Foreign Cultures Using a Model Developed in the United States. Management Science, 40(1), 72–95. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.1.72 Harris, P. R., & Moran, R. T. (1999). Managing Cultural Differences: Leadership Strategies for a New World of Business (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Gulf Professional Publishing.
190
Project and Risk Management in a Global Context
Hechanova-Alampay, R., Beehr, T. A., Christiansen, N. D., & Van Horn, R. K. (2002). Adjustment and Strain among Domestic and International Student Sojourners. A Longitudinal Study. School Psychology International, 23(4), 458–474. doi:10.1177/0143034302234007 Hillson, D. (2003). Effective Opportunity Management for Projects Exploiting Positive Risk. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. doi:10.1201/9780203913246 Hodgson, D., & Cicmil, S. (Eds.). (2006). Making projects critical. New York: Palgrave McMillan Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-0-230-20929-9 Hulett, D. T. (1995). Project Schedule Risk Assessment. Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 21–31. Kendrick, T. (2015). Identifying and Managing Project Risks: essential tools for failure-proofing your project (3rd ed.). Amacon. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management (11th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner and Marx, Houghton Mifflin. Koivu, T., Nummelin, J., Tukiainen, S., Tainio, R., & Atkin, B. (2004). Institutional complexity affecting the outcomes of global projects. Working Papers 14. VTT. Lan, L., Qing-hua, H., & Long-long, S. (2015). Identifying the Project Complexity Factors of Complex Construction Projects. Proceedings of International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (22th) (pp. 1697-1702). Retrieved October 07, 2016 from http://icmse.hit.edu.cn/icmsecn /ch/reader/ create_pdf.aspx?file_no=L2015090226&flag=2 Laszlo, E. (1994). The evolutionary project manager. In D. I. Cleland & R. Gareis (Eds.), Global project management handbook (International Editions). New York: McGraw-Hill. Levin, G., & Ward, J. L. (2011). Project Management Complexity. A Competency Model. Taylor & Francis Group. Loosemore, M., Raftery, J., Reilly, C., & Higgon, D. (2006). Risk Management in Projects. New York: Taylor & Francis. Mayerhofer, H., Hartmann, L. S., Michelitsch-Riedl, G., & Kollinger, I. (2004). Expatriate Assignments: A Neglected Issue in Global Staffing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(8), 1371–1389. doi:10.1080/0958519042000257986 Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. (1986). Acculturation profiles of expatriate managers: Implications for cross-cultural training programs. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 21(4), 73–79. Mendenhall, M. E., & Stahl, G. K. (2000). Expatriate training and development: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management, 39(2), 251–265. doi:10.1002/1099-050X(200022/23)39:2/33.0.CO;2-I
191
Project and Risk Management in a Global Context
Metcalf, L. E., Bird, A., Shankarmahesh, M., Aycan, Z., Larimo, J., & Valdelamar, D. D. (2006). Cultural tendencies in negotiation: A comparison of Finland, India, Mexico, Turkey, and the United States. Journal of World Business, 41(4), 382–294. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.004 Motet, G. (2009). Les cahiers de la sécurité industrielle. La Norme ISO, 31000, 10. Nokes, S., & Kelly, S. (2008). Il project management. Tecniche e processi. Milano, Italy: FT Prentice Hall. Perano, M. (2010). Il Project Management. In M. Pellicano & M. V. Ciasullo (Eds.), La visione strategica dell’impresa (pp. 321–355). Torino, Italy: Giappichelli Editore. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). Critical success factors across the project life cycle. Project Management Journal, 19(3), 67–75. PMI (Project Management Institute). (2009). Practice Standard for Project Risk Management. Philadelphia: PMI. Rayner, S. (1990). Risk in cultural perspective: Acting under uncertainty. Norwell, MA: Klewer. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7873-8_7 Renn, O., & Rohrmann, B. (2000). Cross-cultural risk perception: State and challenges. In O. Renn et al. (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception. A survey on empirical studies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_6 Rowat, C. (2003). LRN supply-chain risk and vulnerability workshop. Logistics & Transports Focus, 5(2), 68–69. Schollhammer, H. (1973). Strategies and Methodologies in International Business and Comparative Management Research. Management International Review, 13(6), 17–31. Schwalbe, K. (2007). Information Technology Project Management (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology. Schwarz, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology, and social choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Shepard, M. (2012). Il nuovo standard internazionale di project management: ISO 21500. Il Project Manager, 11. Steven, J. (2001). Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and software. New York: Scribner. Thomas, J. (2000). Making sense of project management. In R. Lundin, F. Hartman, & C. Navarre (Eds.), Projects as business constitutents and guiding motives. London, UK: Elsevier Academic. doi:10.1007/9781-4615-4505-7_3 Tonchia, S. (2007). Il Project Management. Milano, Italy: Il Sole24Ore. Tonchia, S., & Nonino, F. (2007). Il Project Management. Milano, Italy: Il Sole24Ore
192
Project and Risk Management in a Global Context
Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y.Amy Yi Ou. (2007). Cros-snational, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3), 426–478. doi:10.1177/0149206307300818 Tung, R. L. (1984). Business negotiations with the Japanese. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Vidal, L.-A., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(8), 1094–1110. doi:10.1108/03684920810884928 Weaver, G. R. (1998). The Process of Reentry. In G. R. Weaver (Ed.), Culture, Communication, and Conflict: Readings in Intercultural Relations (2nd ed.; pp. 230–238). Simon & Schuster Publishing. Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277–305. doi:10.1177/014920630202800303 White, A. (2009). From comfort zone to performance management. White & MacLean Publishing. White, D., & Fortune, J. (2002). Current practice in project management – an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00029-6 Williams, T. M. (1999). The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 269–273. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00047-7 Wirick, D. W. (2009). Public-Sector Project Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470549131
193