GILMER INTERMEDIATE - Gilmer Independent School District

GILMER INTERMEDIATE Campus Improvement Plan 2012/2014

This plan is designed to contain elements that address all state and No Child Left Behind improvement plan requirements. It also integrates strategies from our campus improvement plan for adequate yearly progress.

Gilmer Intermediate School is a Title 1 Part A Schoolwide Campus.

Date Reviewed: 09/18/13 Date Approved: 11/12/12 DMAC Solutions ™

Page 1 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

GILMER INTERMEDIATE Mission Prepares every student for the collegiate experience Recognizes and educates each as a unique individual Nutures academics, social and cultural differences success and strength Develops reliant citizens who contribute to the community's success and strength

Vision All children can excel when expected to. Student achievement is a shared responsibility. Real change is about commitment, not compliance. People have to get in the driver's seat to own change. Accoutability starts with the individual. Next to children, time is a a school's most precious resource.

Nondiscrimination Notice GILMER INTERMEDIATE does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, or disability in providing education services, activities, and programs, including vocational programs, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972; and section 504 of the rehabilitation Act of 1973; as amended. DMAC Solutions ™ Page 2 of 28 Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

No Child Left Behind Performance Goals (These goals have not been updated by the U.S. Department of Education as of the 2012/2014 school year.)

Goal 1.

By 2013-2014, all students will reach high standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics.

Goal 2.

All limited English proficient students will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics.

Goal 3.

By 2005-2006, all students will be taught by highly qualified teachers.

Goal 4.

All students will be educated in learning environments that are safe, drug-free, and conducive to learning.

Goal 5.

All students will graduate from high school.

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 3 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

Title I School wide Plan Checklist [Section 1114 (b) (2)] Any school that operates a school wide program shall first develop (or amend a plan for such a program that was in existence on the day before the date of enactment of the NCLB Act of 2001), in consultation with the LEA and its school support team or other technical assistance provider under section 1117, a comprehensive plan for reforming the total instructional program in the school that: i. Describes how the school will implement the components described below ii. Describes how the school will use resources under this part and other sources to implement the components iii. Includes a list of SEA programs and other federal programs that will be consolidated in the school wide program iv. Describes how the school will provide individual student academic assessment results in a language the parents can understand, including an interpretation of those results, to the parents of a child who participates in the academic assessments required by the SEA plan. Components of a School wide Plan: 1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the whole school 2. Implementation of school wide reform strategies that: • Provide opportunities for all children to meet proficient and advanced levels of student academic achievement • Use effective methods and instructional strategies that are based on scientifically based research that: • Strengthens the core academic program • Increases the amount of learning time • Includes strategies for serving underserved populations • Includes strategies to address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly low achieving children and those at risk of not meeting state standards • Address how the school will determine if those needs of the children have been met • Are consistent with and are designed to implement state and local improvement plans, if any 3. Highly qualified teachers in all core content area classes 4. High quality and on-going professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals 5. Strategies to attract high-quality, highly qualified teachers to this school 6. Strategies to increase parental involvement, such as literary services • Description how the school will provide individual academic assessment results to parents • Strategies to involve parents in the planning, review, and improvement of the school wide plan 7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or a state-run preschool program 8. Opportunities and expectations for teachers to be included in the decision making related to the use of academic assessment results leading to the improvement of student achievement 9. Activities and programs at the school level to ensure that students having difficulty mastering proficient and advanced levels of the academic achievement are provided with effective, timely additional assistance 10. Coordination and integration of federal, state and local funds; and resources such as in-kind services and program components

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 4 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

Comprehensive Needs Assessment Process Each spring, Gilmer Intermediate invites teachers, principals, paraprofessionals, parents, and other appropriate campus staff to participate in planning for the upcoming school year. Gilmer Intermediate conducted a parent survey to gain input on several issues. Participants review the following information; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Student performance Highly Qualified Teacher Recruitment/Retention School Climate and Safety Technology Professional Development Parent/Community Involvement Federal Program Planning Amounts

This committee reviews and analyzes data, determines the campus’ strengths and needs, and recommends strategies and activities to address the needs identified. This information is then reviewed by a committee of district and campus leaders to review the committee’s recommendations, prioritize needs, coordinate programs, and review budgets. The campus improvement plan shows clear alignment between the campus’ identified needs and the activities described in the plan. Following the receipt of the state and federal accountability, the plan is revised to address any areas of need indicated for accountability, AYP, and/or PBMAS. Once the plan is revised, a peer review process takes place to ensure that all components of the plan are in place and that it addresses any areas of need that occurred from the state and federal accountability reports. The revised improvement plan is then approved by the Board of Trustees.

GILMER INTERMEDIATE Site Base

Name

DMAC Solutions ™

Position

Aguillon, Wendy

Parent

Albright, Amanda

Parent

Briceno, DeeDee

Parent

Brown, Chris

Community member

Brunin, Whitney

Parent

Castro, Monica

Parent

Chandler, Nicole

Parent

Clamp, JoAnn

Parent

Couture, Michelle

Parent

Cowan, Martha

Business member

Daniels, Angela

Parent

Douglas, Asia

Parent

Dunn, Ceris

Parent

Elder, Carol

Teacher

Fountain, Jon

Parent

Gordon, Tina

Parent

Granville, Aleshia

Parent

Green, Rachel

Teacher

Guillen, Marie

Parent

Hernandez, Stephen

Parent

Hoffpauir, Jessica

Teacher

Holder, Debra

Non-teaching professional

Lara, Alondra

Parent

Luong, Kim

Parent

Martin, Kristal

Parent

Mauldin, Mindy

Parent

Miller, Michelle

Parent

Moon, Julie

Teacher

Munoz, Amber

Parent Page 6 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

GILMER INTERMEDIATE Site Base

Name

DMAC Solutions ™

Position

Nolan , Alise

Parent

Perez, Esther

Parent

Pilcher, Denny

Business member

Ray, Tyra

Parent

Rice, Bobby

Principal

Rocha, Maribel

Parent

Slaughter, Cindy

Parent

Summerville, Tiffany

Parent

Tefteller, Regina

Community member

Thomas, Christine

Parent

Thomas, Mandy

Parent

Tucker, Susan

Parent

Vera, Catalina

Parent

Wilson, Candace

Parent

Wilson, Shannell

Parent

Young, Davy'our

Parent

Page 7 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

GILMER INTERMEDIATE Goal 1.

To improve student performance in the area of Mathematics. To ensure that all students pass the Math state assessment.

Objective 1.

TARGET: Have a minimum of 92% of our students in each student group pass the state assessment for math (All, AA, Hispanic, White, Eco Disad) in 2013 and have 100% of our students in each student group pass in 2014.

Activity/Strategy

Person(s) Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Evaluation

1. Teachers will analyze assessment data by Academic Coordinators, GIS Student Expectaion to plan target instruction. Principal, Teacher(s) (Title I SW: 1,3,4,8,9,10) (Title I TA: 1) (Target Group: H, AA, ECD, M, F, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,3,4,5)

Nov 2012-June 2014 (each 3 weeks)

(F)Title I - $13,566.11, (O)Region 7, (S)SSIG

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, No Buckeye Left Behind document

2. Tutoring will be provided during,before, and Academic Coordinators, GIS after school to increase instructional time. Principal, Teacher(s) (Title I SW: 1,3,4,6,8,9,10) (Title I TA: 1) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,3,4,5)


(F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $13,566.11

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards

3. Teachers will be provided additional 40 minutes of time daily for horizontal planning and cross curricular planning. (Title I SW: 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10) (Title I TA: 2) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,3,4,5)

Academic Coordinators, GIS Principal, Teacher(s)


(F)CNA Documents, (L)Consultant, (L)District Curriculum Documents, (O)DMAC, (S)State Compensatory

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, changes in scope and sequence

4. Model lessons will be presented each six weeks with a rubric and anchor charts. (Title I SW: 1,2,4,9) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2)

Academic Coordinators, Director Nov 2012-June of Elementary Instruction, GIS 2014 (each 6 Principal, Teacher(s) weeks)

(F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $13,566.11, (S)Local Funds, (S)SSIG

scope and sequence, lesson plans, anchor charts, standard based bulletin boards

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 8 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


To improve student performance in the area of Reading and to ensure that all students pass the Reading state assessment.

Objective 1.

TARGET: Have a minimum of 93% of our students in each student group pass the state assessment for reading(All, AA, Hispanic, White, Eco Disad)in 2013 and have 100% of our students in each student group pass in 2014.

Activity/Strategy


Timeline

1. Teachers will analyze assessment data by student expectation to identify instructional focus. (Title I SW: 1,2) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2)



2. Teachers will be provided additional 40 minutes of time daily for horizontal planning and cross curricular planning. (Title I SW: 1,2,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,5)

Academic Coordinators, Director Nov 2012-June of Elementary Instruction, GIS 2014 (each 3 Principal, Teacher(s) weeks)

Resources (F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $13,566.11, (L)Consultant, (S)Local Funds

Evaluation scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, No Buckeye Left Behind document.

(F)CNA Documents, (S)Local scrimmage results, benchmark Funds, (S)State Compensatory - results, state assessments, $30,000 report cards, scope and sequence, model lessons, anchor charts, standards based bulletin boards

3. Tutoring will be provided before, during, and Academic Coordinators, GIS after school to increase instructional time. Principal, Teacher(s) (Title I SW: 1,2,9) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,5)


(F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $13,566.11


4. Model lessons with rubrics will be presented Academic Coordinators, GIS each six weeks. (Title I SW: 1,2,3) (Target Principal, Teacher(s) Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,5)


(F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $13,566.11, (L)TARGET, (O)DMAC

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, standards based bulletin boards, rubrics, lesson plans, scope and sequence

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 9 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


To improve overall student performance in the area of Science and ensure that all 5th grade students pass the Science state assessment.

Objective 1.

TARGET: Have a minimum of 92% of our 5th grade students in each student group pass the state assessment for science(All, AA, Hispanic, White, Eco Disad) in 2013 and have 100% of our students in each student group pass in 2014.

Activity/Strategy 1. Teachers will analyze assessment data by student expectation to plan target instruction. (Title I SW: 3,8,10) (Target Group: H, AA, AtRisk) (NCLB: 3,5)


Timeline

Resources

Evaluation



(L)District Curriculum Documents, (L)TARGET, (O)DMAC, (S)Local Funds

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, No Buckeye Left Behind document.

2. Teachers will be provided additional 40 Academic Coordinators, GIS minutes per day of planning time for horizontal Principal, Teacher(s) and cross curricular planning. (Title I SW: 1,2,3,10) (Target Group: H, AA, AtRisk) (NCLB: 3,5)


(F)CNA Documents, (L)District Curriculum Documents, (L)TARGET, (L)Team Planning Meetings, (O)DMAC, (O)Time, (S)State Compensatory $30,000

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, scope and sequence, lesson plans, standards based bulletin boards

3. Model lessons with rubrics will be presented Academic Coordinators, GIS each six weeks. (Title I SW: 1,3,4,10) (Target Principal, Teacher(s) Group: All, H, AA, AtRisk) (NCLB: 3,5)


(F)CNA Documents, (L)District Curriculum Documents, (L)TARGET, (O)Report Cards/Progress Reports, (O)Time, (S)Local Funds

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, standards based bulletin boards, scope and sequence, lesson plans, rubrics

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 10 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


To improve overall student achievement.

Objective 1.

Set high expectations for students and staff.

Activity/Strategy 1. Efficiently identify students with learning difficulties and provide support to overcome those difficulties. (Title I SW: 1,2,9,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,4,5)


Timeline

Academic Coordinators, Nov 2012-June Curriculum Director, Director of 2014 (each 3 Elementary Instruction, Director weeks) of Special Education, GIS Principal, Teacher(s)

Resources (F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $13,566.11, (L)GISD Policy Manual, (L)TARGET, (O)DMAC, (O)Time, (S)SSIG

Evaluation scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, No Buckeye Left Behind document.

2. Ensure that all LEP students become Academic Coordinators, GIS proficient in English. (Title I SW: 9,10) (Target Principal, Teacher(s) Group: ESL, LEP) (NCLB: 2)


(F)Title III Bilingual / ESL - $636, scrimmage results, benchmark (O)DMAC, (O)State Assessment results, state assessments, Data, (O)Time, (S)AEIS Report, report cards (S)SSIG

3. Recognize student efforts through incentives and awards ceremonies. (Title I SW: 6,10) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5)

Academic Coordinators, Counselor(s), GIS Principal, Teacher(s)


(O)Report Cards/Progress Reports, (O)Time, (S)Local Funds

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, honor rolls, teacher awards

4. Continue to implement inclusion for Special Campus Staff, Director of Education students. (Title I SW: 3,4,9) (Target Special Education, GIS Group: SPED) (NCLB: 1,4,5) Principal, Paraprofessionals, Teacher(s)


(O)Time, (S)Local Funds, (S)SSIG


5. Provide homebound services to eligible students. (Title I SW: 1,3,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)

Counselor(s), GIS Principal, Homebound Teacher, Teacher(s)

as needed through June 2014

(L)Attendance Records, scrimmage results, benchmark (O)Email communication/phone results, state assessments, calls, (O)Time, (S)FTE - 0.25 report cards

6. Provide accelerated instruction to students not meeting the standards on State Assessments. (Title I SW: 1,3,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)



(F)CNA Documents, (L)Consultant, (L)District Curriculum Documents, (L)Region IV , (L)TARGET, (O)DMAC, (O)State Assessment Data, (O)Time, (S)Local Funds

scrimmage results, benchmark results, state assessments, report cards, Istation Reading reports, Thinking Through Math reports.

7. Create new lesson plan form that requires list of questions, ticket out, and tie to previous learning. (Title I SW: 1,8) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)


Nov 2012-June 2014

(F)CNA Documents, (L)Team Planning Meetings, (O)Time

lesson plans, planning meetings, state assessments

Nov 2012-June 2014

(F)CNA Documents, (L)Consultant, (O)Professional Development, (O)Region 7, (O)Time

sign in sheets, discipline reports, state assessment results

8. All first and second year teachers will attend GIS Principal, Teacher(s) classroom management training in November 2012 through Region VII. (Title I SW: 1,9) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 4,5)

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 11 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM



Objective 1.

Set high expectations for students and staff.

Activity/Strategy 9. Restructure master schedule to allow for flex scheduling of tutorials and assist with the times students are attending core classes. (Title I SW: 1,2) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5)


Timeline

Resources

Evaluation


Nov 2012-June 2014

(L)Class Rosters/Schedules, (O)Time

10. Academic coordinators will mentor, assist, Academic Coordinators, GIS and guide teachers in curriculum planning, Principal instruction, and assessment. (Title I SW: 1,3,4,8,9,10) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(F)Title I - $13,566.11, (L)District state assessment results, AYP Curriculum Documents data

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 12 of 28

discipline referrals, tutoring schedules, state assessment results

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM



Objective 2.

Provide additional classroom support to at-risk students.

Activity/Strategy


Timeline

Resources

Evaluation

1. Provide additional classroom support to atrisk students. (Title I SW: 1,3,10) (Target Group: AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)

Academic Coordinators, GIS Principal, Paraprofessionals


(F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I - scrimmage tests, benchmarks, $13,566.11, (O)DMAC, (S)State state assessments, report cards, Compensatory - $15,278 tutorial schedule, AYP notebooks, No Buckeye Left Behind documents, Reading levels

2. Redesigned scope and sequence and instructional calendar to better support our students and the greatest areas of instructional need. (Title I SW: 1,8,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)

Academic Coordinators, Curriculum Director, Director of Elementary Instruction, GIS Principal, Teacher(s)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(L)District Curriculum Documents, (L)Team Planning Meetings

lesson plans, instructional calendars, state assessment results

3. New tutorial scheduling will allow students Academic Coordinators, GIS time in the computer lab to work with I-Station, Principal, Librarian, Thinking Through Math, and A-Z Reading. Paraprofessionals, Teacher(s) (Title I SW: 1,9) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(F)CNA Documents, (F)Title I $2,505, (L)Consultant, (O)Time

program reports, sign in sheets, state assessment results

4. Students will attend Why Try training for character trait building. (Title I SW: 2,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 4,5)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(L)GISD Policy Manual, (O)Time, (S)Local Funds

discipline referrals, state assessment results, promotion rate

DMAC Solutions ™

Counselor(s), GIS Principal, Paraprofessionals, Teacher(s)

Page 13 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


To provide professional development that will increase student achievement.

Objective 1.

All Teachers and Staff will be highly qualified.

Activity/Strategy


Timeline

Resources

Evaluation

1. Provide quality staff development to ensure Curriculum Director, GIS retention and recruitment of highly qualified Principal, Region 7 staff. (Title I SW: 4,5,9) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 3)


(F)CNA Documents, (L)GISD Policy Manual, (O)Time, (S)Local Funds

Support faculty and staff in order to retain a highly qualified staff.

2. Provide annual update training to ensure Curriculum Director, Director of common procedures for identifying, supporting, Elementary Instruction, GIS and monitoring the following students: Principal, Region 7 Dyslexia, LEP, SpEd, G/T, and At-Risk. (Title I SW: 3,4) (Target Group: ESL, SPED, GT, AtRisk, Dys) (NCLB: 3,5)


(L)GISD Policy Manual, (O)Region 7

Support faculty and staff in order to retain a highly qualified staff.

3. Provide continued staff development in Curriculum Director, Director of areas of district and campus focus. (Title I SW: Elementary Instruction, GIS 4) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 3,5) Principal, Region 7


(L)GISD Policy Manual, (S)Local Support faculty and staff in order Funds to retain a highly qualified staff.

4. Director of Instructional Services implements mentorship program for new teachers. (Title I SW: 1,3,4,9) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,2,3,4,5)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(O)Time, (S)Local Funds

DMAC Solutions ™

Director of Instructional Services, GIS Principal

Page 14 of 28

teacher retention rate, state assessment results

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


Use of Student Performance Data to guide instructional planning.

Objective 1.

Use student performance data to drive instruction toward student success.

Activity/Strategy


Timeline

Resources

Evaluation

1. Campus will incorporate SMART Goal Academic Coordinators, Director Nov 2012-June process into all campus decisions. (Title I SW: of Elementary Instruction, GIS 2014 (each 6 1) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5) Principal, Teacher(s) weeks)

(O)Report Cards/Progress Reports, (O)Time, (S)SSIG

High quality instruction will ensure student success in all areas.

2. Units of instruction, lesson planning, and curriculum notebooks will be kept up to date. (Title I SW: 1,2,8,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,4,5)



(L)District Curriculum Documents, (L)Team Planning Meetings, (O)Time

High quality instruction will ensure student success in all areas.

3. Contract with data coach to provide technical assistance to improve data disaggregation and to monitor instruction. (Title I SW: 1,2,4,8,9) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,2,5)

Academic Coordinators, Curriculum Director, Director of Elementary Instruction, GIS Principal, Region 7, Superintendent(s)

November -June 2013

(S)Local Funds

state assessment results, AYP results

DMAC Solutions ™

Page 15 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


Use of Student Performance Data to guide instructional planning.

Objective 2.

Additional 40 minute planning period to plan instruction

Activity/Strategy


1. Structured 40 minute planning period to plan Academic Coordinators, GIS instruction horizontally, and cross curriculum Principal, Teacher(s) (Title I SW: 1,3,10) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 1,5)

DMAC Solutions ™

Timeline Nov 2012-June 2014 (each 3 weeks)

Page 16 of 28

Resources (F)CNA Documents, (S)FTE, (S)State Compensatory $25,248.99

Evaluation lesson plans, scope and sequence, rubrics, standards based bulletin boards

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


To improve campus climate and address campus violence, intervention, and prevention.

Objective 1.

To provide a safe, positive, and nurturing school environment.

Activity/Strategy


Timeline

Resources

Evaluation

1. Students will be monitored before, during and after instructional times. (Title I SW: 1,9) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 4)

GIS Principal, Teacher(s)

Nov 2012-June 2014


discipline report, tobacco report, safe schools report, gun report

2. Provide opportunities to teach and model drug, dating, and violence prevention. (Title I SW: 6) (Target Group: All, AtRisk) (NCLB: 4,5)

Academic Coordinators, Counselor(s), GIS Principal, Teacher(s)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(O)Time, (S)TASB

Effective schools research shows that student who work in a safe climate show increased academic achievement.

3. Provide opportunities for student recognition Academic Coordinators, through incentives and awards. (Title I SW: Counselor(s), GIS Principal, 6,10) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 4,5) School Nurse, Teacher(s)




4. Provide student support groups as needed. Counselor(s), GIS Principal, (Title I SW: 9) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 4) School Nurse

Nov 2012-June 2014

(O)Time


5. First and second year teachers will attend professional development on classroom management. (Title I SW: 1) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 4)

Nov 2012-Nov 2013

(F)CNA Documents, (O)Region 7

completion certificate, discipline referrals, time on task

DMAC Solutions ™


Page 17 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM


Increase parental involvement in school activities.

Objective 1.

Incorporate parental partnerships in student's education.

Activity/Strategy 1. Provide regular opportunities to present strategies and other instructional techniques to parents. (Title I SW: 6) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5)


Resources

Evaluation

Nov 2012-June 2014

(F)Title I - $1,205.50

Sign in sheets, Math Night (Nachos and Numbers)

2. Provide progress reports each three weeks Academic Coordinators, GIS period, along with feedback from assignments. Principal, Teacher(s) (Title I SW: 6) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(L)GISD Policy Manual

Increased parental involvement results in incresed student achievement.

3. Written communication with parents Academic Coordinators, GIS concerning academic and behavioral Principal, School Nurse, expectations will occur regularly. (Title I SW: 6) Teacher(s) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 1,5)

weekly

(F)Title I - $1,205.50


4. Provide opportunities for parents to Academic Coordinators, celebrate student success: Counselor(s), GIS Principal, Band and Music Programs Teacher(s) Six Weeks Celebrations End of Year Awards Ceremony (Title I SW: 6) (Target Group: All) (NCLB: 5)

Nov 2012-June 2014

(O)Time


DMAC Solutions ™

Academic Coordinators, Counselor(s), Director of Elementary Instruction, GIS Principal, Teacher(s)

Timeline

Page 18 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

Resources

Resource Title I

Source Federal

Title IIA Principal and Teacher Improvement Federal

DMAC Solutions ™

FTE

State

SSIG

State

State Compensatory

State

Page 19 of 28

Dec 16, 2013 3:25 PM

Gilmer ISD CD#230902 Title I Campus Allocation Entitlement Reservation Allocation

$536,399 $ (80,020) $456,379 Gilmer ISD Campus Allocation*

Campus Gilmer Elementary Gilmer Intermediate Bruce Junior High Gilmer High School

Lowincome % 70 62 56 48

Low-income students 752 209 212 303

Per-pupil 292.64 569.71 74.12 335.06

Campus Allocation 220,072 119,070 15,713 101,524 Total = $456,379

*Template derived from example in PPT presentation at ACET conference

The Intermediate campus has been allocated $26,149 of the Title I campus allocation for professional development to meet the AYP School Improvement Stage 1 requirement for professional development in reading. The Intermediate campus qualified for a School Improvement Grant in the amount of $15,000 to assist with professional development in math for an instructional coach and for a data coach for both math and reading.

STAAR Demographics by Subject for Grade 05 for GILMER ISD Year: 2012 Language(s): English Test Version(s): STAAR,STAAR-L Calculation Option: Met TAKS Standard Retests: First Administrations

Score Code(s): S Source: Admin

Reading/ELA SubPopulation

Tested

Mathematics

Met TAKS Met TAKS Std Std%

Tested

Science


Tested


All Students

155

135

87

156

122

78

158

0

0

African American

21

17

81

22

14

64

22

0

0

Hispanic

23

20

87

23

17

74

27

0

0

White

102

91

89

102

84

82

101

0

0

ECD

96

80

83

97

71

73

96

0

0

page 1 of 1 DMAC Solutions ™

11/6/2012

STAAR Demographics by Subject for Grade 06 for GILMER ISD Year: 2012 Language(s): English Test Version(s): STAAR,STAAR-L Calculation Option: Met TAKS Standard Retests: First Administrations

Score Code(s): S Source: Admin

Reading/ELA SubPopulation

Tested

Mathematics


Tested

Social Studies


Tested

Science


Tested


All Students

160

135

84

158

111

70

1

0

0

1

0

0

African American

26

18

69

23

18

78

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hispanic

11

9

82

11

8

73

0

0

0

0

0

0

White

113

99

88

114

79

69

1

0

0

1

0

0

ECD

90

69

77

87

53

61

0

0

0

0

0

0

page 1 of 1 DMAC Solutions ™

11/6/2012

Cummlative Data All Subject 2011-2012 Total # Items

5 Reading 5 Math 5 Science 6 Reading 6 Math

All Hispanic

46 50 44 48 52

30 30 33 33 28

African American

28 27 31 30 27

28 27 28 32 29

White Two + Races

31 30 34 33 28

Free Reduced LEP

28 27 31 29 23

32 25

29 27 33 35 29

26 22 29

60 50 50

46

52 48

44

40

30

34 3333 32 31 33 3130 30 3030 28 2827 27 282728 29 28

32 25

31 2827 29

35 33

5 Reading 46

29 29 29 27 26

23

22

20

5 Math 50 5 Science 44 6 Reading 48 6 Math 52

10

0 Total # Items All

Hispanic African American White Two + Races Free

Reduced

LEP