Good Documentation Practices

5 downloads 171908 Views 1MB Size Report
Good Documentation. Practices and. Maintaining Good. Customer Relations. November 14, 2007. Presented by. John P. Ahlers. 206-515-2226 ...
Good Documentation Practices and Maintaining Good Customer Relations November 14, 2007

Presented by John P. Ahlers 206-515-2226

Customer Relations „ Maintain

the Business relationship with the Customer and keep your customer informed of extra costs and time in a timely and businesslike manner. „ Customer’s respect forthright honest information even if the news is bad. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Balance is Key „ Do

not be obnoxious. „ Be up front; do not “hide” bad news. „ Completely inform the Owner of costs and options. „ Do not be a trusting sap! J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Lawsuits, sadly, are not decided on truth but instead are decided on the proof adduced at trial.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

General Rule: In a construction dispute the party with the better documentation prevails.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Consequence of Poor Daily Job Reports Appellant produced no contemporaneous documentation that substantiates the extent of the cumulative impact claimed . . . [Bechtel] project personnel did not keep notes or maintain any documentation of disruptive impact caused by the RFIs. [Citation omitted.] J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

There was no contract requirement, and [Bechtel] did not have a company policy or requirement that project personnel maintain logs or diaries . . . [Bechtel] asserted that it was impossible to observe loss of productivity, but such assertion does not excuse or satisfactorily explain the options of contemporaneous recording of the exhaustive disruption claimed in this appeal. Bechtel National, Inc., 90 BCA 22,549. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Contractor Fails to Keep Records, Loses Claim From the record before the board, [contractor] has failed to meets its burden of establishing a Type I differing site condition in those areas of the site not recognized by [the owner] . . .

[Contractor] provided no documentation, photographs, videos or quality control reports, of debris or rubble considered to be a DSC between stations 130+00 and the upper end of the project. Circle, Inc., 95 BCA p. 27, 568. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Ground Rules „

„

If in doubt about the importance of an item, write down the details, including the date and time. If something needs to be recorded, write it down immediately. Avoid the temptation to write it down later. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Ground Rules „

J. Ahlers

At the end of each day, review everything you have written down. Refine or expand your notes as necessary. Make copies as necessary and see that all copies are securely stored.

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Good Documentation Practices „ Accurate „ Objective „ Complete „ Uniform „ Credible „ Timely J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

What to Document? „ If

in doubt, write it down. „ The item or occurrence that appears to be the least significant item or occurrence in the situation will likely become the most important item to document. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

What to Document? „ The

item or occurrence you fail to document will become the item that you, your supervisor or your company's attorney will wish most that you had documented. „ Murphy’s Law J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

How to Document? „ Pencil

and Paper „ Computers (Authentication) „ Photographs (Digital Photographs Storage Authentication, Dated) „ Video Camera Recorder „ Audiotape Recorders J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Conducting and Documenting Meetings „ Have

regular meetings at regular times. Don't put them off for anything except an emergency. „ Special meetings should be called by note or memo. Verbal notice is not effective unless the meeting will occur within the next half hour. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Conducting and Documenting Meetings (cont.)

„ Start

on time, and when you are finished, break up the meeting. „ Prepare a written agenda in advance and stick to it. Use photocopies and/or a blackboard (whiteboard) list to keep everyone on the agenda topics. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Conducting and Documenting Meetings (cont.) „ Make

sure someone is keeping notes of the meeting. „ Meeting notes must contain or show the date, time and place of the meeting on each page of notes. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Effective Meeting Notes „

Notes must include the name, title and company affiliation of everyone who attended the meeting, as well as the same information about key persons referenced in the meeting but not in attendance.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Effective Meeting Notes (cont.) „

„

Notes must cover all matters discussed at the meeting that relate to the project (six basic principles "AOCUCT"). Meeting notes should be concise. They do not need to cover all the discussion, but they must clearly state the resolution of each important point and the key reasons that supported the decision. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Effective Meeting Notes (cont.) „ Any

agreement reached should be specifically noted. If agreement is not reached, the position of each party should be noted. If conclusions or agreements are not reached, the notes should show what each person will do about the unresolved issue and when they will do it. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Effective Meeting Notes (cont.) „

J. Ahlers

Ideally, all representatives attending the meeting should read the notes and initial them at the conclusion of the meeting. However, if any representative refuses to initial the notes, let it pass.

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Effective Meeting Notes (cont.) „ Each ER T S MA LE I F J OB

J. Ahlers

meeting attendee should receive a copy of the notes, and a copy should also be included in a master job file.

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Job Diaries „

The single most important documentation on a job is the field supervisor's daily report or job diary. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Job Diaries (cont.) „A

job diary is a daily report which is prepared in a consistent format. Its purpose is to create a written record of what went on in the field that day: crew assignments „ quantities of work put in place „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Job Diaries (cont.) verbal and written orders from owner's representatives „ visitors to the jobsite „ unusual conditions, circumstances and events. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Job Diaries (cont.) subcontractor personnel on the job „ quality of work put in place by subcontractors „ materials and equipment delivered by suppliers „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Job Diaries (cont.) delays encountered „ extra work „ agreements made with owners, subcontractors and suppliers „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary „

Summary of weather conditions at the beginning of the work day and any significant changes that take place during the day or before the next work day begins. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary (cont.) „

Conversations in person or by phone with the owner, engineer, subcontractors, suppliers, inspectors or OSHA inspectors. Summarize the conversation and include pertinent details, including the name, title and phone number of each person you talked with. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary (cont.) Verbal orders, requests for additional work or changes in the work received from the engineer or owner. „ Shop drawings or submittals received or sent, with notation of action taken. „ Distribution of crews noting what they are working on. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary (cont.) Subcontractors on the job and note of progress made. „ Job progress information, such as yards of concrete placed, production schedules met or milestones met. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary (cont.) Workers present, workers absent and reasons for absence, if known. „ Discipline or warnings issued to workers „ Hiring and firing actions. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary (cont.) Conversations with stewards, union halls, dispatchers or other union personnel. „ Accidents, including circumstances, actions taken, as well as names, addresses and phone numbers of all witnesses. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Examples of Items to Include in Job Diary (cont.) Tool or equipment malfunctions or difficulties. „ Deliveries of materials, supplies or equipment. „ Phone log, correspondence log. „ Any special problems or unusual events. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Example of Items Not to Include in Job Diary?

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton Contract for street widening. „ Contract stated relocation of utilities would be by utility companies. „ Scoccolo required to coordinate relocation with utility companies. „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „

Contract provided: No additional compensation will be made to [Scoccolo] for reason of delay caused by actions of any utility company and [Scoccolo] shall consider such costs to be incidental to the other items of the contract. (“teflon” clause) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „ Puget

Power did not timely complete relocation of the overhead power lines with underground lines. „ Scoccolo was delayed and damaged. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

DELAY

Washington’s Statutory Prohibition of “No Damage For Delay” Clauses RCW 4.24.360 (enacted 1979) Any clause in a construction contract . . . Which purports to waiver, release, or extinguish the rights of a contractor, subcontractor, or supplier to damages or an equitable adjustment arising out of unreasonable delay in performance which delay is caused by the acts or omissions of the contractee or persons acting for the contractee is against public policy and is void and unenforceable. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „

„

Renton's Motion for Summary Judgment based upon the exculpatory contract provision was granted by trial court. Court of Appeals initially reversed but does not directly address the question of whether RCW 4.24.360 invalidated the no damage for delay clause of the contract. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton

„

„

J. Ahlers

On remand, a jury awarded Scoccolo damages ($1 million). Renton appealed for a second time.

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „

„

The Court of Appeals reversed, thereby invalidating a substantial portion of Scoccolo’s jury verdict. The Court held that the utilities were not a “person acting for the contractee” and therefore the statute did not apply. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „

Utilities were not a “person acting for the contractee” despite the fact that the City had written franchise agreements with the utilities which gave it the power to compel the relocation.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „ „

Scoccolo had no contractual power to compel the utilities to act. Scoccolo was not in contractual privity with the utilities, therefore Scoccolo cannot pursue the utilities for its delay damages.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton „ „

Court of Appeals 2005 decision is first reported case to interpret RCW 4.24.360. Decision’s narrow interpretation of phrase “person acting for the contractee” likely to result in more owners attempting to reinsert no damage for delay clauses back into their contracts. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Scoccolo Construction v. Renton Supreme Court Victory „ „

„

Unanimous verdict in favor of Scoccolo, the utilities were “acting for” the City. RCW 4.24.360 (No Damages for Delay Statute) trumped the "teflon” clause (no compensation for utility company delay). Scoccolo’s $1 million is restored. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Sample School District Notice and Claim Procedures 1. Written notice to Owner and Architect within 14 days of the event giving rise to claim for additional compensation or time including a clear description of the event leading to the claim. [Event Notice]

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Sample School District Notice and Claim Procedures 2. Within 14 days of the first written notice, Contractor shall submit a written claim which includes: • •



Clear description of the claim; Proposed change in Contract sum or time; and Data supporting the claim. [Claim Notice] J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Sample School District Notice and Claim Procedures 3. Within 14 days of receipt of the written claim, Contractor may require that a principal of the Architect and representative of the Owner meet and confer in an attempt to resolve the claim within the next 21 days. [Claim Procedure] J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Sample School District Notice and Claim Procedures

4. If the claim is not resolved, the Contractor is required to mediate the dispute, prior to commencing litigation. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Sample School District Notice and Claim Procedures

5. Litigation must be served and filed within the earlier of: a)

b)

120 days after Substantial Completion designated in writing by the Owner, or 60 days after Final Acceptance

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Subcontract Notice Provision NOTICE OF CLAIMS, INCLUDING EXTRA WORK, CHANGES, DELAYS: Subcontractor shall provide written notice to Contractor within five (5) working days, or if the Main Contract provides for a shorter period, within sufficient time to allow Contractor to give notice to Owner, after the occurrence of any instances of interruption, J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Subcontract Notice Provision (cont.) extra work, additional work, delay hindrance and/or efficiency loss of any nature whatsoever in Subcontractor's Work, believed by Subcontractor to be caused by the acts or omissions of Contractor, other subcontractors, Owner, the Architect/Engineer or the employees or agents of any of them. [Event Notice] J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Subcontract Notice Provision (cont.) In the event Subcontractor believes it is entitled to receive compensation due to damages from such an occurrence(s) and/or is entitled to an extension of time, Subcontractor's Statement of Claim (setting forth in detail the entitlement and quantum basis for Subcontractor's claim with supporting data and/or the entitlement basis to J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Subcontract Notice Provision (cont.)

support an extension of time) shall be delivered within fourteen (14) working days after Contractor's receipt of Subcontractor's written notice of claim, or if the Main Contract provides for a shorter time, within sufficient time to allow Contractor to forward Subcontractor's claim to Owner. [Claim Notice] J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Contract Notice Provision Failure by Subcontractor to provide timely (as provided in the paragraph) written notice and/or failure by Subcontractor to provide its timely Statement of Claim for an increase in the Subcontract amount and/or time extension, shall result in an absolute waiver of Subcontractor's claim. [Implied Waiver] J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Contract Notice Provision (cont.) Contractor does not waive the requirement for timely written notice and/or timely written submission of the Statement of Claim, unless contract's waiver is unequivocal, explicit and in writing.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Notice of Claims 3 hurdles to cross: „ „

„

Timely written notice of the event giving rise to the claim Written documentation of the entitlement and cost backup to support the claim Follow the contract claim resolution procedures J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Reason for Written Notice Requirement „ „ „ „ „

Allow owner to explore cost reduction options Keep Owner informed as to costs (allow Owner to track costs) Protect Owner from paying for work it does not want Ensure work was ordered Evidence that work is extra J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Absher Constr. Co. v. Kent School District Kent School District Absher Construction Company Chapman Mechanical Emerald Aire J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Absher Constr. Co. v. Kent School District „

„ „

Two (2) days before final acceptance Emerald Aire claim based on defective plans and specifications Emerald Aire submitted RFIs - met with designers Notice must be in writing, concerns are not claims for costs J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Absher Constr. Co. v. Kent School District „ „ „

Strict interpretation of contract notice requirement Prejudice not required to enforce a contract notice requirement Trend towards stricter interpretation of notice requirement

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Absher Constr. Co. v. Kent School District “Absher contends the notice provisions were waived because the District suffered no prejudice. However, Washington does not require an element of prejudice to enforce contractual notice provisions.” J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane Spokane County Owner „ Mike M. Johnson Contractor „ Sewer Project „ WSDOT Specifications „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane „ „

April 1998 Award County notified contractor at the preconstruction conference of road widening which caused a revision of the storm sewer

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane „

„ „

June 4, 1998 Change Order 3 revised the design of the road and sewer ($69,000) – changes clause Mike M. Johnson made no objection or protest Mike M. Johnson encounters telephone cables (Verizon) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane „

Specification § 1-04.5 „

„

Written notice of protest within 15 calendar days (5 requirements) No protest – deemed acceptance

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane

„

Specification § 1-09.11 „ „

„

Failure to follow protest procedure as a waiver If protest fails to achieve resolution, must submit claim (10 requirements) Failure to follow claim procedure as a waiver

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane „

„ „

June 26, 1998 MMJ letter: Lists seven "concerns," one of which is the phone line "causing additional costs and delays" July 16, 1998 County letter: Invites a claim July 24, 1998 MMJ letter: Doing an analysis

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane „ „

August 3, 1998 County letter: No claim – utility locate statute August 7, 1998 County letter: MMJ letter "too general and nonspecific regarding relief"

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. The County of Spokane „

„

„

August 14, 1998 MMJ letter: Expect compensation while waiting for Verizon relocation August 25, 1998 MMJ's lawyers letter: $98,000/50 days. No supporting explanations, no reference to contract January 27, 1998 County letter: Will negotiate, but no waiver J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Court's Decision „ „

„

Contractor did not comply with the protest procedure. § 1-04.5. Contractor did not follow claim procedure. § 1-09.11. "Contractual condition precedent to Contractor's right to seek judicial relief." Comments or concerns that do not include the amount of the claim or length of the delay are not a claim under the contract. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

MMJ Dilemma An owner can demand additional work outside the scope of the original contract, observe the contractor perform that work, discuss the work with the contractor, and yet deny fair compensation for services rendered if the contractor fails to submit a written request for additional time for the demanded work or fails to produce an itemized invoice in a precise technical format. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

MMJ Dilemma (cont.) The owner can direct work be done and the owner is not prejudiced by the contractor's failure to abide by the technical requirements of submitting a claim for payment but the contractor nevertheless forfeits its claim.

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

The MMJ Dissent “It is unjust to declare as a matter of law that the contractor is not entitled to fair compensation merely because the contractor did not also conform to additional highly technical claims procedures. It is not merely unjust, it is out of step with Washington law.” Justice Chambers J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

WSDOT Documentation Requirements “Throughout any protested work, the Contractor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred.” WSDOT §1.04.5 (2006)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

WSDOT Documentation Requirements “Failure of Contractor, subcontractor or lower tier subcontractors to maintain and retain sufficient records . . . Shall constitute a waiver of a claim and shall bar any recovery thereunder.” WSDOT §1.09.12(2) (2006) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

APWA Drastic Consequence of Failure to Meet Documentation Requirements It is expressly agreed between Contractor and Owner that the Daily Diary maintained by Contractor shall be the “Contractor’s Book of Original Entry” for the documentation of any potential claims for disputes that might arise during the Contract. Failure of Contractor to maintain this Diary in the manner described above will constitute a waiver of any such claims or disputes by Contractor. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Antidote to MMJ

Counter the notice provisions with the implied obligation to cooperate the duty not to hinder or delay J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Implied Duty “In every contract there is an implied term that the Owner or person for whom the work is done [general contractor] will not hinder or delay the contractor [subcontractor], and for such delays, the contractor may recover additional compensation.” Jones Assoc. v. Eastside Properties, 41 Wn. App. 462, 471 (1985) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Implied Duty The implied duty consists of two parts: (1) A duty not to hinder or delay; and (2) An affirmative obligation to cooperate with each other. [T]he person for whom the work is contracted to be done [owner or general contractor] . . . Will in all ways facilitate the performance of the work. Lonvic v. Dunator, 18, Wn. App. 274, 284 (1977) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Implied Obligation to Facilitate the Work The owner [general contractor] has an . . “implied obligation to keep the work of construction in such a state of forwardness as will enable the contractor to complete his contract within the specified time.” Erickson v. Edmonds Sch. Dist., 13 Wn.2d 398, 409 (1942) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Recommendation „

Before bid „

„

Private projects – prudent owners may opt to simplify the notice and claim procedures to receive a lower bid price Public projects – given enough input from bidders, public owners may be persuaded to make the notice and claim procedures more “contractor-friendly” on future projects J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Recommendation

„

During performance „

„

Carefully review the contract notice provisions and note the time for giving notice Chart the claims and protest procedures at the outset of the project

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Recommendation (cont.) „

“Heads up letter” – give the owner advance notice of the process „

„

J. Ahlers

“Unless it is in writing, it did not happen!” – advise that oral directives or handshakes will not work “Do you really want this hassle?” – provide the owner with an RFI showing the owner the complexity of the process

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Recommendation (cont.) Supplement the claim and time extension requests as the project proceeds „ Use forms „ Overcome the notion that giving notice will spoil your working relationship with the owner „

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Suggested Reservation of Rights Language The compensation and time adjustment in this change order does not include any amounts for changes in the sequence of the work, delays, disruptions, rescheduling, extended overhead, acceleration, lost productivity, and/or impact costs, and the right is expressly reserved to make a claim for any and all of these and related items of cost prior to any final settlement of this contract. J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

NOTICE LETTER

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Standard Specifications (2004) (WSDOT and Municipal Projects)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Standard Specifications (2004) (WSDOT and Municipal Projects) Differing Site Conditions (Cont.)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Standard Specifications 2004 (WSDOT and Municipal Projects Differing Site Conditions (Cont.)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

AIA A201 General Conditions (1997)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

AIA A201 General Conditions (1997) Construction Change Directive (Cont.)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

AIA A201 General Conditions (1997)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

AIA A201 General Conditions (1997) Concealed or Unknown Conditions Claim Event (Cont.)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

AIA A201 General Conditions (1997)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

AIA A201 General Conditions (1997) Claim Event (Not Concealed or Unknown Condition) (Cont.)

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Successful Negotiations Appearance Matters • Personal Appearance

Image is Important • Company Image (hear, vehicles, site, office)

Conveying Confidence J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Avoiding Lawsuits „ Empower

all project personnel to identify disputes earlier „ Require disputes be communicated to decision makers „ Overcome the notion that Notice will spoil your working relationship with the General Contractor or Owner J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Avoiding Lawsuits (cont.) „

„

„

Establish a process for meeting the contract notification requirements (you can always withdraw a premature or incorrect notice; you cannot resurrect a missed notice deadline) Establish a strategy to resolve disputes early on the job; if the Owner’s on-site personnel are unresponsive, go to the next level Maintain superior project records J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Avoiding Lawsuits (cont.) „

„

Overcome the notion that Notice will spoil your working relationship with the General Contractor or Owner Establish a process for meeting the contract notification requirements (you can always withdraw a premature or incorrect notice; you cannot resurrect a missed notice deadline) J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226

Avoiding Lawsuits (cont.) a strategy to resolve disputes early on the job; if the Owner’s on-site personnel are unresponsive, go to the next level „ Maintain superior project records „ Establish

J. Ahlers

Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC

206-515-2226