C.W.F. Everitt et al., in Near Zero: Festschrift for William M. Fairbank, edited by ....  B. Mashhoon, R. Neutze, M. Hannam, and G.E. Stedman, Phys. Lett. A.
arXiv:gr-qc/0311030v2 17 Apr 2008
Gravitoelectromagnetism: A Brief Review Bahram Mashhoon Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA Abstract. The main theoretical aspects of gravitoelectromagnetism (“GEM”) are presented. Two basic approaches to this subject are described and the role of the gravitational Larmor theorem is emphasized. Some of the consequences of GEM are briefly mentioned.
The analogy between gravitation and electromagnetism has a long history. The similarity between Newton’s law of gravitation and Coulomb’s law of electricity naturally led to a gravitoelectric description of Newtonian gravitation. Moreover, on the basis of advances in electrodynamics in the second half of the nineteenth century, Holzm¨ uller  and Tisserand  postulated that the gravitational force exerted by the Sun on the planets of the solar system had an additional “magnetic” component. This extra force led to the precession of the planetary orbits; therefore, it could be adjusted in order to account for the excess perihelion precession of Mercury. Decades later, however, Einstein’s general relativity provided a beautiful explanation of the excess motion of Mercury’s perihelion in terms of a relativistic gravitoelectric correction to the Newtonian gravitational potential of the Sun . Furthermore, general relativity, which is a field theory of gravitation, contains a gravitomagnetic field due to mass current . Indeed, to bring together Newtonian gravitation and Lorentz invariance in a consistent field-theoretic framework, the introduction of a gravitomagnetic field is unavoidable. 1
CHAPTER 1. GRAVITOELECTROMAGNETISM:
A BRIEF REVIEW
According to general relativity, the proper rotation of the Sun produces a gravitomagnetic field and the influence of this field on planetary orbits was first considered by de Sitter  and later in a more general form by Lense and Thirring . The gravitomagnetic contribution to the excess motion of Mercury’s perihelion turns out to be much smaller and in the opposite sense compared to the main gravitoelectric motion; in fact, it turns out that the Lense-Thirring precession of planetary orbits is too small to be measurable at present. On the other hand, evidence for the gravitomagnetic field of the Earth has been offered by Ciufolini by studying the motion of laser-ranged satellites LAGEOS and LAGEOS II . The precise measurement of this field via superconducting gyroscopes in a drag-free satellite in polar orbit about the Earth is one of the aims of NASA’s GP-B . Within the framework of general relativity, gravitoelectromagnetism (“GEM”) has been discussed by a number of authors [3, 8]; a more extensive list of references is provided in . The purpose of this review is to present the two principal approaches to GEM and briefly describe some of their consequences.
Linear Perturbation Approach to GEM
We are interested in the general linear solution of the gravitational field equations . It is assumed that a global background inertial frame with coordinates xµ = (ct, x) and Minkowski metric ηµν is perturbed due to the presence of gravitating sources such that gµν = ηµν + hµν (x). It proves useful to define the trace-reversed amplitude ¯ µν = hµν − 1 ηµν h, where h = η µν hµν is the trace of hµν . To linear order in the h 2 perturbation, Einstein’s field equations 1 8πG Rµν − gµν R = 4 Tµν 2 c
take the form
16πG Tµν (1.2) c4 ¯ µν,ν = 0. The general solution of after imposing the transverse gauge condition h (1.2) is a superposition of a particular solution together with the general solution of the wave equation; however, we are only interested in the special retarded solution of (1.2) given by Z Tµν (ct − |x − x′ |, x′ ) 3 ′ 4G ¯ d x. (1.3) hµν = 4 c |x − x′ | ¯ µν = − 2h
Let us define the matter density ρ and matter current j = ρv via T 00 = ρc2 and T 0i = cj i , respectively. Moreover, it is useful to define the GEM potentials Φ and A ¯ 00 = 4Φ/c2 and h ¯ 0i = −2Ai /c2 , respectively. Assuming that in terms of ρ and j as h the source consists of a finite distribution of slowly moving matter with |v|