Growth of Aeromonas Species on Enteric Agars - Journal of Clinical ...

8 downloads 0 Views 517KB Size Report
Aeromonas spp. on these media varied greatly (range, 0 to 100%), as did their colony size when compared ... obtained from Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, June 1986, p. 1065-1067 0095-1137/86/061065-03$02.00/0 Copyright C 1986, American Society for Microbiology

Vol. 23, No. 6

Growth of Aeromonas Species

on

Enteric Agars

E. DESMOND1* AND J. MICHAEL JANDA2t Laboratory Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10468,1 and Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 100292

Received 24 October 1985/Accepted 20 February 1986

The efficacy of eight routine enteric agars for supporting the growth of 32 strains of Aeromonas spp. (17 A. hydrophila strains, 8 A. sobria strains, and 7 A. caviae strains) was investigated. The plating efficiency of Aeromonas spp. on these media varied greatly (range, 0 to 100%), as did their colony size when compared with that on noninhibitory medium (5% sheep blood agar). Plating efficiency on seven of these eight media appeared to be strain- and not species dependent. Overall, eosin-methylene blue and Hektoen enteric agars showed low plating efficiencies for A. hydrophila, whereas both A. sobria and A. caviae were severely inhibited on brilliant green agar. When all these species are considered collectively, deoxycholate, MacConkey, and xylose lysine deoxycholate appeared to be the most satisfactory routine agars for Aeromonas spp. recovery when used in conjunction with blood agar.

Aeromonas species are increasingly being recognized as important cause of gastroenteritis worldwide, and it has recently been suggested that they are also a cause of traveler's diarrhea (5, 6, 9). Evidence supporting these aquatic bacteria as important gastrointestinal enteric pathogens includes well-described case studies (1, 3, 4, 13, 14), a large case-controlled survey (5), the demonstration of enterotoxin-producing strains (2), serologic responses subsequent to gastrointestinal infection (3, 13), and resolution of symptomatology subsequent to antimicrobial therapy directed against Aeromonas spp. (1, 4, 13). Although Aeromonas species are generally accepted as a cause of bacterial gastroenteritis, the actual incidence of this disease as well as colonization rates in humans may vary widely with geographic locale. Although a number of selective agars or enrichment broths have been devised for the recovery of these organisms (17), the clinical significance of the recovery of Aeromonas spp. from such agars is unknown because growth obtained on such media may reflect only transient colonization, particularly during the warmer months. In addition, the use of a selective agar for the recovery of Aeromonas spp. as part of a routine gastrointestinal workup may be costly and time-consuming. Recently, Holmberg and Farmer suggested that the isolation of Aeromonas spp. from stools be reported only when moderate-to-heavy growth occurs on primary plating (7). However, moderate-to-heavy growth of Aeromonas spp. from stools can be expected only if the media used are not inhibitory to Aeromonas spp. growth. For this reason, we decided to evaluate the growth ofAeromonas spp. on enteric media widely used for the isolation of Salmonella, Shigella, and other enteric pathogens.

from clinical specimens submitted to the Mount Sinai Hospital laboratories. Isolates were initially identified to the genus level by established criteria (16) and then identified to the species level as previously described (8, 11). Brilliant green (BG), bismuth sulfite (BS), deoxycholate (DC), Hektoen enteric (HE), salmonella-shigella (SS), and blood agar (BA) base (heart infusion agar) agars were obtained from Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich. MacConkey (MAC) agar was obtained from GIBCO Diagnostics, Madison, Wis., and xylose lysine DC (XLD) and Levine's eosin-methylene blue (EMB) agars were obtained from BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md. BA plates contained 5% sheep blood. All of the enteric agars and the BA plates were prepared in the microbiology laboratory, Bronx Veterans Administration Medical Center. Measuring plating efficiency. A method similar to that described by Marold et al. (12) was used to measure plating efficiency. Organisms were grown overnight at 37°C in Trypticase soy broth (BBL). Dilutions of each organism were made in Trypticase soy broth to 10-5, 10-6, and 10-7. A 0.1-ml sample of each dilution was plated on the eight enteric agars and BA. After 48 h of incubation at 37°C, colonies were counted on BA plates. Colony counts were made and colony sizes were measured on the set of plates which yielded a colony count on BA of 30 to 300. Plating efficiency was expressed by dividing the number of colonies on the enteric agar by the number of colonies on the BA plate and multiplying by 100%. Mean plating efficiency for a medium was obtained by adding the number of colonies of all the strains on the enteric agar, dividing by the total number of colonies on the corresponding BA plates, and multiplying by 100%X.

an

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Bacterial strains and culture media. The 17 strains of Aeromonas hydrophila, 7 strains of Aeromonas caviae, and 8 strains of Aeromonas sobria used in this study were isolated

There was a wide variation in plating efficiency among strains of the same Aeromonas sp. on the various media (Fig. 1). On ail media tested, some Aeromonas isolates were significantly inhibited (1-log reduction, 90% decrease in CFU) compared with counts obtained on BA. This inhibition was random in nature, that is, one strain did not usually

Corresponding author. t Present address: Microbial Diseases Laboratory, California Department of Health Services, Berkeley, CA 94704. *

1065

100-

J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.

DESMOND AND JANDA

1066 v

sa '6'

*A

z

80 -

o

qui

60 -

v

+4,

00 > tO* w %

m I

Aeromonas spp.,

8

O

AO

z o

A z w

Cu

0

A

Zoo

a-,

ib

0

CA 0

0

*

.0

oA

o

A

20

A

0

0

*

0000

BG

BS

DC

EMB

HE

* 4

MAC

SS

XLD

TYPE OF ENT *ERIC AGAR FIG. 1. Inhibition of Aeromonas sp ecies growth on enteric agars. Colony number on BA = 0% inhibi tion. BG, Brilliant green; BS, bismuth sulfite; DC, deoxycholate EMB, Levine's eosinmethylene blue; HE, Hektoen enteric; salmonella-shigella; XLD, xylose lysine dc oxycholate. A. A. hydro 'oxchoate ' phila; O, A. sobria; A, A. caviae.

show significant reduction in CFU

on more

than two enteric

agars.

The relative inhibition of the 32 Aeromonas isolates on the eight media tested is shown in Table 1 . DC agar was the least inhibitory medium tested, with onl [y 9.4% (3/32) of the Aeromonas strains inhibited more th an 90% in comparison with BA. In fact, of all the media testted, only DC and XLD permitted the growth of all 32 strains tested to some extent. Conversely, BG agar was most inh ibitory to Aeromonas spp., with 59% (19/32) of the strains tested showing a 2-log reduction (99%) in CFU on this med ium. BG agar failed to support the growth of any A. cavia te or A. sobria strains (Table 1). Individual plating efficiencies and mean colony sizes for each of the three Aeromonas spp. are listed in Table 1. Three media (BG, BS, and EMB) yielded srmall mean colony sizes (1.0 to 2.0 mm) for all three Aeromo nas spp., while MAC, DC, and XLD exhibited the largest A eromonas colony sizes after 48 h of incubation. Many Aeron ionas strains produced colonies on media regarded as highl y selective for Salmonella and Shigella spp. (BS and SS). 1Of 32 strains tested, 22 (69%) showed less than a 1-log redi action in CFU on BS, while 21 (66%) showed a similar phe nomenon on SS. DISCUSSION The number of proven bacterial gastroenteritis agents has increased over the past several years and now includes such diverse groups as certain serotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica, Campylobacter spp., invasive Escherichia coli (0:157, H:7), Plesiomonas shigelloides, new halophilic Vibrio spp., and Aeromonas spp. Because the development of enteric agars, essentially designed for the primary isolation of Salmonella and Shigella spp., predated the discovery of these bacteria, either new selective agars are required to isolate these microorganisms (as in the case of Campylobacter spp.) or laboratory workers must make use of existing selective and differential agars. From this study, it is apparent that one factor potentially influencing the incidence of Aeromonas gastroenteritis seen in different geographic locales is which enteric media is used in each laboratory. Media such as EMB, BG, and BS are generally unsatisfactory for the recovery of Aeromonas spp., owing to the poor plating efficiency and small colony size of Aeromonas spp. on these agars. Other common enteric media, such as HE and XLD, are unsuitable because they contain sucrose;

generally

sucrose

positive (85%),

are over-

these media. In fact, in our experience, lactosepositive Aeromonas isolates are not uncommon and thus looked

on

would be similarly missed

on MAC agar (8, 11). Because individual strains show large variations in relative inhibition on different enteric media, it seems preferable that at least

two different agars be used in the attempted isolation of Aeromonas spp. Holmberg and Farmer recommended that the presence of Aeromonas and Plesiomonas organisms in stool specimens be reported when they predominate or when their growth is heavy on nonselective media (7). The data reported here suggest that Aeromonas spp. sometimes do not predominate on enteric media because of growth inhibition of some strains

spp.

on

these media. To evaluate whether Aeromonas

growth from a stool specimen is heavy

appears to require

a

BA plate

or

or

predominant

other nonselective,

nonenteric media. All of the enteric media used in this study, including those regarded as nonselective, inhibited the growth of some Aeromonas strains. Other researchers previously recommended the routine use of BA in the detection of Aeromonas spp. in feces (6, 9, 10, 15). Our data support this recommendation. However, because swarming Proteus spp. on BA can prevent the isolation of Aeromonas spp., the enteric agars are an essential adjunct to the use of BA. Because cost limits the variety of media that can be used for the workup of fecal specimens, many laboratories will continue to rely on BA and enteric media for the isolation of Aeromonas spp. Among the enteric media used for this purpose, DC appears to be least inhibitory for Aeromonas spp. When selecting media to be used for the routine workup of feces, it is well to bear in mind that 11 of 32 Aeromonas strains (34%; Table 1) were inhibited more than 90% on the widely used HE and EMB media. It is therefore appropriate that enteric agars selected for routine use in the workup of gastrointestinal specimens not only be able to isolate Salmonella and Shigella spp. satisfactorily but be flexible enough to recover other potential enteric pathogens of medical importance. If the frequency of Aeromonas diarrhea in the patient population of a given institution is high, the routine use of a selective agar specifically designed for Aeromonas spp. with a relatively high plating efficiency for most strains would seem to be advantageous. This study reports the plating efficiency of Aeromonas clinical isolates on commonly used enteric agars. The plating efficiency of these TABLE 1. Plating efficiency and colony size of Aeromonas species on enteric agars A. hydrophila A. caviae A. sobria Mediuma

BG BS DC EMB HE MAC SS XLD

RPE MPE MCS RPE (%)b (%)l' (mm), (%

0-100 0-100 3-100 0-77 9-88 0-100 0-77 1-100

50 41 51 15 28 31 25 42

1.5 0 2.0 0-100 3.5 10-92 1.0 13-98 3.5 0-35 3.5 2-70 2.5 0-59 3.0 4-87

MPE MCS (% (mm)

0 51 58 59 21 38 27 50

RPE (%

MPE MCS (%) (mm)

0 0 0 1.0 0-86 25 3.5 12-100 79 1.5 0-100 56 3.5 1-68 43 3.5 11-88 48 2.5 2-67 43 3.5 1-98 54

0 1.0 4.0 1.0 2.5 4.5 3.5 3.5

aBG, Brilliant green; BS, bismuth sulfite; DC, deoxycholate; EMB, Levine's eosin-methylene blue; HE, Hektoen enteric; MAC, MacConkey;

SS, salmonella-shigella; XLD, xylose lysine deoxycholate. b RPE, Range of plating efficiency. c MPE, Mean plating efficiency. MCS, Mean colony size.

VOL. 23, 1986

GROWTH OF AEROMONAS SPECIES ON ENTERIC AGAR

with Aeromonas spp. directly from stool specimens remains to be determined.

agars

LITERATURE CITED 1. Baman, S. I. 1980. Aeromonas hydrophila as the etiologic agent in severe gastroenteritis: report of a case. Am. J. Med. Technol. 46:179-181. 2. Burke, V., J. Robinson, J. Beaman, M. Gracey, M. Lesmana, R. Rockhill, P. Echevarria, and J. M. Janda. 1983. Correlation of enterotoxicity with biotype in Aeromonas spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:1196-1200. 3. Champsaur, H., A. Andremont, D. Mathieu, E. Rottman, and P. Auzepy. 1982. Cholera-like illness due to Aeromonas sobria. J. infect. Dis. 145:248-254. 4. Dhalla, S., and J. T. Flynn. 1980. Aeromonas hydrophilainduced fulminant diarrhea. N.Y. State J. Med. 80:1965-1966. 5. Gracey, M., V. Burke, and J. Robinson. 1982. Aeromonasassociated gastroenteritis. Lancet ii:1304-1306. 6. Gracey, M., V. Burke, and J. Robinson. 1984. Aeromonas spp. in traveller's diarrhoea. Br. Med. J. 289:658. 7. Holmberg, S. D., and J. J. Farmer. 1984. Aeromonas hydrophila and Plesiomonas shigelloides as causes of intestinal infections. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6:633-639. 8. Janda, J. M. 1985. Biochemical and exoenzymatic properties of Aeromonas species. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 3:223-232. 9. Janda, J. M., E. J. Bottone, and M. Reitano. 1983. Aeromonas species in clinical microbiology: significance, epidemiology, and

1067

speciation. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis 1:221-238. 10. Janda, J. M., A. Dixon, B. Raucher, R. B. Clark, and E. J. Bottone. 1984. Value of blood agar for primary plating and clinical implication of simultaneous isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas cav'iae from a patient with gastroenteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20:1221-1222. 11. Janda, J. M., M. Reitano, and E. J. Bottone. 1984. Biotyping of Aeromonas isolates as a correlate to delineating a speciesassociated disease spectrum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 19:44-47. 12. Marold, L. M., R. Freedman, R. E. Chamberlain, and J. J. Miyashiro. 1981. New selective agent for isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:977-980. 13. Palfreeman, S. J., L. K. Waters, and M. Norris. 1983. Aeromonas hydrophila gastroenteritis. Aust. N.Z. J. Med. 13:524-525. 14. Rahman, A. F. M. S., and J. M. T. Willoughby. 1980. Dysentery-like syndrome associated with Aeromonas hydrophila. Br. Med. J. 281:976. 15. Robinson, J., V. Burke, P. J. Worthy, J. Beaman, and L. Wagener. 1984. Media for isolation of Aeromonas spp. from feces. J. Med. Microbiol. 18:405-411. 16. von Graevenitz, A. 1985. Aeromonas and Plesiomonas, p. 278-281. In E. H. Lennette, A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., and H. J. Shadomy, (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. 17. von Graevenitz, A., and C. Bucher. 1983. Evaluation of differential and selective media for isolation of Aeromonas and Plesiomonas spp. from human feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17: 16-21.