Heat Exchanger Design

49 downloads 446171 Views 1MB Size Report
Heat Exchanger Design. PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin. 2 7 -. Lecture Objectives. Be familiar with the major types of available heat-exchange equipment ...
LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

054410 Plant Design LECTURE 7: HEAT EXCHANGER DESIGN Daniel R. Lewin Department of Chemical Engineering Technion, Haifa, Israel Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 13 7-1

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Lecture Objectives After this lecture, you should: n Be familiar with the major types of available heat-exchange equipment, with particular emphasis on shell-and-tube heat exchangers. o Know how to estimate overall heat transfer coefficients for a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. p Know how to compute pressure drops on both sides of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. q Be able to perform mechanical design of the most appropriate shell-and-tube heat exchanger to meet desired duty and pressure drops. 7-2

1

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers 1-1 Fixed Head

Segmental baffles

Holes drilled to tube size 7-3

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers 1-1 Fixed Head

Segmental baffles

Holes drilled to tube size 7-4

2

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers 1-2 Fixed Head

1-2 Floating Head

7-5

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers 1-2 U-tube

2-4 Floating Head

7-6

3

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers These movies demonstrate the flow of process fluids in a typical shell-and-tube heat exchanger set-up.

7-7

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers The following heuristic (from Seider et al, 2004) is useful to assist in selecting which process fluid should be designed to pass through the tubes, and which should pass through the shell: Heuristic 55: The tube side is for corrosive, fouling, scaling, hazardous, high temperature, high-pressure, and more expensive fluids. The shell side is for more viscous, cleaner, lower flow-rate, evaporating and condensing fluids. 7-8

4

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Quiz: Identify the following… A

1-1 Fixed Head 1-2 U-tube 1-2 Fixed Head 2-4 Floating Head 3-6 Fixed Head 7-9

B

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

C http://www.tema.org Heat Exchanger Design

Fin-fan Heat Exchangers In fin-fan heat exchangers, air is forced in cross-flow across tubes carrying process fluid.

7 - 10

5

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Fin-fan Heat Exchangers

Design issues: (a) Use Heuristic 56 for initial design; (b) Design the tube-banks similarly to a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. 7 - 11

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Fin-fan Heat Exchangers Heuristic 56: For an air-cooled exchanger, the tubes are typically ¾1” in outside diameter. The ratio of fin surface area to tube outside bare area is 15-20. Fan power requirement is the range 2-5 Hp per 106 Btu/hr, or 20 Hp per 1,000 ft2 of tube outside surface (fin-free) area. Minimum approach temperature is about 50 oF (much higher than water-cooled exchangers). Without the fins, the overall heat transfer coefficients would be about 10 Btu/hr ft2 oF. With the fins, U = 80-100 Btu/hr ft2 oF, based on tube outside, bare surface area.

See also: Ludwig, Vol. 3. 7 - 12

6

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Furnaces -Typical Applications Example of uses of process furnaces:

 Steam boilers  Distillation column reboiler  Heating distillation column feed stream  Heating reactor feed stream  Heating a heating stream  Reactor (reaction inside furnace coil)

Operation principles: Process stream flows through a coil heated by combustion of fuel in the furnace chamber. 7 - 13

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Typical Furnace Coil Arrangements  Vertical tube bank along the walls of a circular furnace  As above, with the addition of horizontal tube bank in a convection section

Convection section

Radiation section

 A single horizontal tube bank in the center of the furnace, with burners along each side wall  Parallel horizontal tube banks along each wall, with a central wall. 7 - 14

7

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Gas burners

Dividing wall

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Furnaces – Getting Started Heuristic 57: Typical fluxes in fired heaters are 12,000 Btu/hr-ft2 in the radiation section and 4,000 Btu/hr-ft2 in the convection section, with approximately equal duties in the two sections. Typical process liquid velocity in the tubes is 6 ft/s. Thermal efficiencies for modern fired furnaces is 8090%.

7 - 15

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers

7 - 16

8

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Temperature-Driving Forces The rate of heat transfer in an shell-and-tube exchanger is computed as: Q = mc ⋅ (HC ,out - HC ,in ) = mh ⋅ (HH ,out - HH ,in ) Assuming (1) steady-state; (2) counter- or cocurrent flow; (3) constant overall heat transfer coefficient; (4) no phase changes on either side; and (5) negligible heat losses: Q = U ⋅ A ⋅ ∆TLM where: ∆TLM =

7 - 17

(T

h ,in

-Tc ,out ) - (Th ,out -Tc ,in ) ⎛T -T ln ⎜ h ,in c ,out ⎜T ⎝ h ,out -Tc ,in

⎞ ⎟⎟ ⎠

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Temperature-Driving Forces

FT

For multiple-pass shell-and-tube exchangers, the flow directions of the two fluids are combinations of countercurrent and co-current flow, reducing the effective value of ∆TLM . For a 1-2 exchanger, with assumptions 1, 3, 4 and 5: It is desirable to have a value of FT Q = U ⋅ A ⋅ ∆TLM ⋅ FT for 1-2 where: FT =

of 0.85 or higher. Values below 0.75 are unacceptable. 2 R +1 ⎤

ln [(1 − S ) (1 − RS )] R + 1 2

( (

) )

⎡2 − S R + 1 − ⎥ FT = 1 for phase ( R − 1 ) ln ⎢ 2 ⎢ 2 − S R + 1 + R + 1 ⎥ change in duty fluid ⎣ ⎦ When FT < 0.75, Th ,in -Th ,out Tc ,out -Tc ,in increase the R = , and S = shell passes. Tc ,out -Tc ,in Th ,in -Tc ,in

Nagle (1933)

7 - 18

9

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Temperature-Driving Forces FT for 1-2 shell-and-tube exchanger.

7 - 19

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Example 13.5 A hot stream is cooled from 200 to 140 oF by a cold stream entering at 100 oF and exiting at 190 oF. Determine the true ∆TLM and select the appropriate shell-and-tube configuration. Solution: 40 - 10 = 21.6 oF For counter-current flow: ∆TLM = ⎛ 40 ⎞ ln ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ 10 ⎠ For multiple-pass exchangers: T -T 200 - 140 FT for 1-2 R = h ,in h ,out = = 0.667 Tc ,out -Tc ,in 190 - 100 T -T 190 - 100 FT for 4-8 S = c ,out c ,in = = 0.9 Th ,in -Tc ,in 200 - 100 7 - 20

10

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Example 13.5 (Cont’d) FT for 4-8 shell-and-tube exchanger.

R = 0.67

FT = 0.85

Thus, 4 shells need to be installed, in a 4-8 configuration. In this case, FT = 0.85, and: ∆TLM FT = 21.6 × 0.85 = 18.4o F 7 - 21

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

S = 0.9 Heat Exchanger Design

Example 13.5 (Cont’d)

7 - 22

11

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Class Exercise 1 A hot stream is cooled from 1,150 to 560 oF by a cold stream entering at 400 oF and exiting at 1,000 oF. Determine the true ∆TLM and select the appropriate shell-and-tube configuration. Solution: For counter-current flow: ∆TLM = For multiple-pass exchangers: T -T R = h ,in h ,out = Tc ,out -Tc ,in T -T S = c ,out c ,in = Th ,in -Tc ,in 7 - 23

Configuration

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

FT

Heat Exchanger Design

Heat Transfer Coefficients Sieder-Tate (1936) equations:

(a) for tube-side, dimensionless heat transfer coefficient:

JH

h D ⎛Cpµ ⎞ = I I ⎜ k ⎝ k ⎟⎠

−1 3

⎛ µ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ µW ⎠

−0.14

vs.

Tube-side mass flux: GT =

⎛ DI GT ⎞ ⎜ µ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 2 π DI

WT ,A = 4 AT T

(b) for shell-side, dimensionless heat transfer coefficient:

JH

7 - 24

12

h D ⎛ Cp µ ⎞ = O O ⎜ k ⎝ k ⎟⎠

−1 3

−0.14

⎛ deGS ⎞ ⎜ µ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ WS dS C 'B Shell-side mass flux: GS = , AS = AS 144PT ⎛ µ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ µW ⎠

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

vs.

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Shell-side Equivalent Diameter C‘

C‘

PT

PT

C‘

PT

PT − tube pitch (in) C '− tube clearance (in)

de =

, pitch: d

=

e

4 ( wetted area ) wetted perimeter

4PT 2 − π DO2

π DO

+ pitch: d

Shell-side mass flux: GS =

e

=

12PT 2 − π DO2

π DO

WS d C 'B , AS = S AS 144PT

WS − total shell side mass flow (lb/hr), AS − shell crossflow area (ft2 ) dS − shell diameter (in),B − baffle spacing (in) 7 - 25

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Heat Transfer Coefficients Udirty =

RF ,O

Outside fouling

⎛ 1 +⎜ ⎝ hO

⎞ ⎛ tW AO ⎟+⎜ ⎠ ⎝ kW AM

7 - 26

13

⎛ 1 +⎜ ⎝ hO

Internal film resistance

Wall resistance

AO = π DO L

RF ,O

⎛ AO ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ AI ⎠ Internal fouling

External film resistance

Udirty =

1 ⎞ ⎛ AO ⎞ ⎟+⎜ ⎟ + RF ,I ⎠ ⎝ hI AI ⎠

AI = π DI L

1 ⎞ ⎛ DO ⎞ ⎟ + ⎜ h D ⎟ + RF ,I ⎠ ⎝ I I ⎠

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

⎛ DO ⎞ ⎜D ⎟ ⎝ I ⎠

AM =

π L (DO − DI ) log (DO DI )

Uclean =

⎛ 1 ⎜h ⎝ O

1 ⎞ ⎛ DO ⎞ ⎟ + ⎜h D ⎟ ⎠ ⎝ I I ⎠

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Tube Pressure Drop Pressure drop of the fluid flowing in the tube-side of a heat exchanger is given by the Darcy formula: ∆Pt =

fGT2LNT

5.22 × 1010 DI S ( µ µw )

0.14

[psi]

f = friction factor [ft2/in2], GT = tube mass velocity [lb/ft2 hr], L = tube length [ft], NT = total number of tube passes, S = specific gravity, DI = tube I.D. [ft].

In addition, the repeated changes in direction caused by the numerous passes in the tubes adds additional pressure loss, called the “return loss”: 4NT vT2 [psi] ∆Pr = 2g The total pressure drop is: ∆P = ∆Pt + ∆Pr [psi]

7 - 27

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Shell Pressure Drop Pressure drop of the fluid flowing on the shell side of a heat exchanger is given by the Darcy formula: ∆Ps =

fGs2DS (NB + 1 )

5.22 × 1010 De S ( µ µw )

0.14

[psi]

f − friction factor [ft2 /in2 ] GS − mass velocity in shell [lb/ft2 hr] DS − I.D. of shell [ft]

NB − number of baffles

De − equivalent diameter [ft] S − specific gravity

7 - 28

14

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Main Steps Involved Objective: To design a shell-and-tube exchanger to perform heat transfer from a hot stream to a cold stream. Specifications: Given stream physical properties, mass flow rate, process stream source and target temperatures, and the mass flow rate and source temperature of the duty stream. The mechanical design of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger involves two main steps: n Computation of the heat duty o Shell and tube configuration 7 - 29

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Iterative Design Procedure ‰ It is of interest to reduce the heat transfer surface area to a minimum, since this will lead to the cheapest design. ‰ Must satisfy the pressure drop specification (usually pre-defined), which affects the overall heat transfer coefficient. ‰ An iterative design is called for since fluid velocity, pressure drop and heat transfer coefficient are all related: Pressure drop 7 - 30

15

Fluid velocity

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat transfer coefficient Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Iterative Design Procedure Computation of shell-and-tube exchangers involves iteration, since the heat transfer coefficients, pressure drops and heat transfer area all depend on the design’s geometric configuration, which needs to be determined. The geometric configuration (to be determined) includes the following: n o p q r 7 - 31

Shell diameter Tube diameter Tube length Tube packing configuration (pitch) and spacing Number of tube and shell passes

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Class Exercise 2 Design a shell-and-tube heat exchanger to preheat a stream of 30 T/hr containing ethylbenzene and styrene from 10 to 97 oC. Additional data: Density – 856 kg·m-3, Viscosity – 0.4765 cP, Specific heat – 0.428 kcal·kg-1·oC-1, Thermal conductivity – 0.133 kcal·hr-1·m-1·oC-1 Heat supply medium – Saturated steam at 10 barg. Notes: (a) For this application, the process fluid is fed to the tubes. (b) Maximum ∆P in the process side is 0.8 bar. (c) Fouling - process: 0.0002, steam: 0.0001 hr m2/kcal 7 - 32

16

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Class Exercise 2 - Solution A. Stream Data Parameter

Cold side Hot Side Notes Tube side Shell side EB/Styrene Sat. steam Q = mtube·Cptube·∆T 30,000 2,113 =30,000×0.428×(97-10) = 1,117,080 kcal/hr 10 115 msteam = Q/λ 97 115 λ = 528.7 kcal/kg

Units

Fluid Mass Flow

kg/hr

Inlet Temp

oC

Outlet Temp.

oC

Density

kg/m3

Viscosity

cP

856

0.9712

0.4765

0.1262

Cp

Kcal/kg

oC

0.428

K

Kcal/hr cm

0.133

Fouling factor

7 - 33

hr

m2/kcal

0.0002

0.0001

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Class Exercise 2 - Solution B. LMTD Calculation : T- Shell t - tube Variable

Units

Value

oC

18

∆T2 = To - ti

oC

105

LMTD

oC

49.33

LM T D =

c-LMTD

oC

49.33

c-LMTD = ∆TLM×FT FT = 1 (phase change)

∆T1 = Ti - to

C. Heat Duty Q

Kcal/hr

UEstimated AEstimated

7 - 34

17

Notes

∆ T2 − ∆ T1 10 5 − 18 = = 4 9 .3 3 ln ( ∆ T 2 ∆ T 1 ) ln (1 0 5 1 8 )

1.117×106 See previous table

kcal/(hr oC m2) 490-980 Item 5: For light organics, U = 100-200 BTU/(hr oF ft2). m2 23-46 A = Q/( UEstimated×c-LMTD)

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Class Exercise 2 - Solution D. Heat Exchanger Configuration Variable

Units

Value

Notes

Tube passes, NT

4

Assumed

Shell passes, NS

1

Assumed

Tubing O.D., DO

m

0.0254

Tubing I.D., DI

m

0.0198

m/sec

1.4

m2

3.079×10-4

m3/hr

1.55

Tube velocity, VT Tube c-section (I.D.),AT

qT in each tube

No. tubes per pass, N Total no. tubes, NTotal Tube length, L 7 - 35

23 m

92 6

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Taking 1” (I.D.) 12 BWG tubing as basis. Thus DI = 0.782” Allowed range: 1.2-3 m/sec 1.4 m/sec = 4.59 ft/sec AT = (πDI2)/4

qT = AT ×VT = 4.31×10-4 m3/sec N = m/(qT ×ρ) = 30,000/(1.55×856) N × NT/NS Accepted industry standard

Heat Exchanger Design

Class Exercise 2 - Solution D. Heat Exchanger Configuration (Cont’d) Units

Value

Notes

Heat exchanger area, A

Variable

m2

44

A = NS×NTotal×L×π×DO = 44 m2

Pitch Shell I.D., ds AAvailable

m

U-1¼” 0.4382

m2

51

U-pitch selected (why?) 17¼” shell holds 106 tubes. A = NS × 106×L×π×DO = 51 m2

Note that the available heat transfer area, 51 m2, is larger than the value estimated previously, 23-46 m2, so can be reduced! We shall now compute the heat transfer coefficient and the pressure drops in the tube and shell, and compare with our targets. 7 - 36

18

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Class Exercise 2 - Solution E. Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculations

1.1 Tube-side heat exchange. Tube c-section (I.D.),AT m2

c-section area/pass, AT’

m2

GT

Kg/(hr

3.08×10-4

AT = (π DI2)/4

8.21×10-4

AT’ = AT×(106/4)

3,653,462 GT = mtube/AT’

m2)

ReT

42,304

Re = GT×DI/µ

JH

130

See Item 10

Pr

5.52

Pr = Cp×µ/K

Φ=

(µ/µW)-0.14

1

Assume µ = µW

JH = (hIDI/K)·Pr-1/3(µ/µW)-0.14 ⇒ hI = 1,538 Kcal/(hr m2 oC) hI

Kcal/(hr m2 oC)

1,538

1.2 Shell-side heat exchange. Kcal/(hr m2 oC) hO

7,342

7 - 37

For steam, use accepted value: 1,500 Btu/(hr ft2 oF

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Class Exercise 2 - Solution E. Heat Transfer Coefficient Calculations (Cont’d)

1.3 Overall heat transfer coefficients. Kcal/(hr m2 oC) UClean 1,033

UDirty

Kcal/(hr m2 oC)

UService

Kcal/(hr m2 oC)

444

UEstimated

Kcal/(hr m2 oC)

490-980

Uclean =

Udirty =

7 - 38

19

756

UService = Q/(AAvailable×c-LMTD)

1 ⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎛ DO ⎞ ⎜ ⎟+⎜ ⎟ ⎝ hO ⎠ ⎝ hI DI ⎠

RF ,O

⎛ 1 +⎜ ⎝ hO

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

1 ⎞ ⎛ DO ⎞ ⎛ DO ⎞ ⎟+⎜ ⎟ + RF ,I ⎜ ⎟ ⎠ ⎝ hI DI ⎠ ⎝ DI ⎠

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Class Exercise 2 - Solution F. Pressure Drop Calculations 2.1 Tube-side pressure drop. ReT 42,304

ft2/in2

f

0.000185

∆Pt, friction

psi

2.80

∆Pr, return

psi

5.30

∆P

bar

0.55

7 - 39

Re = GT×DI/µ See Item 11 ∆Pr = 4NTVt2/2g = 4×4×4.592/2*g = 5.3 psi ∆PTOT = ∆Pt + ∆Pr = 8.1 psi

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Class Exercise 2 - Solution F. Pressure Drop Calculations (Cont’d)

2.2 Shell-side pressure drop.

B

in

NB + 1

17.25

Assume baffle spacing = shell I.D.

14

NB = no. of baffles = L/B – 1 = 12.7

de

in

0.72

C’

in

0.25

AS

ft2

GS

Kg/(hr

0.413 m2)

Res f ∆PS

Computed as de = 0.72” C’ = PT - DO AS=dSC’B/(PT×144)

55,030

GS = msteam/AS

22,152

Re = GS×de/µs

ft2/in2

0.0015

bar

0.08

See Item 13: ∆PS = 1.16 psi

Note that the shell ∆P is usually much lower than the tube value. 7 - 40

20

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Class Exercise 2 - Solution F. Summary of Step 1. Variable U

Units Kcal/(hr m2 oC)

Target 490-970

Actual 444-1,033

A

m2

23-46

51

∆Ptubes

bar

0.8

0.55

The heat transfer surface is larger than necessary. In contrast, the pressure drop is much lower than its permitted value. Possible next steps include: n o p q 7 - 41

Increase/decrease the shell diameter Increase/decrease the number of tubes Increase/decrease the number of passes Increase/decrease tube diameter

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Summary After reviewing the materials in this lecture, you should: n Be familiar with the major types of available heat-exchange equipment, with particular emphasis on shell-and-tube heat exchangers. o Know how to estimate overall heat transfer coefficients, including the effect of fouling. p Be able to perform mechanical design of the most appropriate shell-and-tube heat exchanger to meet desired duty and pressure drops.

7 - 42

21

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Standard Tube-sheet Layouts Item 4. Standard Tube Sheet Layouts (Kern, 1950, pp. 841-842)

7 - 43

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Item 10. Tube-side Heat Transfer

130

For Re > 5,000, Re → JH does not depend on pipe diameter

42,300

7 - 44

22

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Item 11. Tube-side Friction Factor

0.000185

42,300

7 - 45

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Item 12. Shell-side Heat Transfer

7 - 46

23

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion

LECTURE SEVEN

054410 PLANT DESIGN

Item 13. Shell-side Friction Factor

0.0015

22,195

7 - 47

24

PLANT DESIGN - Daniel R. Lewin

Heat Exchanger Design

Daniel R. Lewin, Technion