High genetic variability and recombination in a ... - Springer Link

2 downloads 0 Views 294KB Size Report
Oct 18, 2011 - Sarah J. C. da Silva • Gloria P. Castillo-Urquiza • Braz T. Hora Júnior •. Iraildes P. Assunça˜o • Gaus S. A. Lima • Gilvan Pio-Ribeiro •. Eduardo ...
Arch Virol (2011) 156:2205–2213 DOI 10.1007/s00705-011-1119-4

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

High genetic variability and recombination in a begomovirus population infecting the ubiquitous weed Cleome affinis in northeastern Brazil Sarah J. C. da Silva • Gloria P. Castillo-Urquiza • Braz T. Hora Ju´nior Iraildes P. Assunc¸a˜o • Gaus S. A. Lima • Gilvan Pio-Ribeiro • Eduardo S. G. Mizubuti • F. Murilo Zerbini



Received: 24 April 2011 / Accepted: 14 September 2011 / Published online: 18 October 2011 Ó Springer-Verlag 2011

Abstract Diseases caused by begomoviruses are a serious constraint to crop production in many tropical and subtropical areas of the world, including Brazil. Begomoviruses are whitefly-transmitted, single-stranded DNA viruses that are often associated with weed plants, which may act as natural reservoirs of viruses that cause epidemics in crop plants. Cleome affinis (family Capparaceae) is an annual weed that is frequently associated with leguminous crops in Brazil. Samples of C. affinis were collected in four states in the northeast of Brazil. Analysis of 14 full-length DNA-A components revealed that only one begomovirus was present, with 91-96% identity to cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV). In a phylogenetic tree, ClLCrV forms a basal group relative to all other Brazilian begomoviruses. Evidence of multiple recombination events was detected among the ClLCrV isolates, which also display a high degree of genetic variability. Despite ClLCrV being the only begomovirus found, its phylogenetic placement, high genetic variability and recombinant nature suggest that C. affinis may act as a source of novel viruses Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00705-011-1119-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. S. J. C. da Silva  G. P. Castillo-Urquiza  B. T. Hora Ju´nior  E. S. G. Mizubuti  F. M. Zerbini (&) Departamento de Fitopatologia/BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Vic¸osa, Vic¸osa, MG 36570-000, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] S. J. C. da Silva  G. S. A. Lima  G. Pio-Ribeiro Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, PE 52171-900, Brazil I. P. Assunc¸a˜o  G. S. A. Lima Departamento of Fitossanidade/CECA, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Rio Largo, AL 57100-000, Brazil

for crop plants. Alternatively, ClLCrV could be a genetically isolated begomovirus. Further studies on the biological properties of ClLCrV should help to clarify the role of C. affinis in the epidemiological scenario of Brazilian begomoviruses.

Introduction Geminiviruses (family Geminiviridae) have circular, single-stranded (ss) DNA genomes that are packaged within twinned quasi-isometric virions. Geminiviruses are divided into four genera, Mastrevirus, Topocuvirus, Curtovirus and Begomovirus, based on genome organization and biological properties, the most important being the type of insect vector (either whitefly, leafhopper or treehopper) and host range (either mono- or dicotyledonous hosts) [9]. Begomoviruses (whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses) cause serious diseases in a number of economically important crops, mostly in tropical and subtropical regions [32]. Over the last four decades, agricultural intensification and the emergence and prevalence of a new and more aggressive biotype of the insect vector (Bemisia tabaci biotype B) have led to an increase in begomovirus populations and their expansion to new plant hosts throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas [15, 16, 21, 27]. In Brazil, begomoviruses are limiting factors for tomato and common bean production [8, 44]. In beans (Phaseolus vulgaris and P. lunatus), bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV) has been an important pathogen since the 1970s, following the increase in soybean (Glycine max) cultivation [4, 5]. The emergence of novel begomoviruses in tomatoes has been attributed to the introduction and spread of the B biotype of B. tabaci in the mid-1990s [30].

123

2206

Weeds are considered reservoirs of begomoviruses that infect crop plants, as well as sources of novel recombinant viruses due to mixed infections [2, 13, 19]. Some of the economically important begomoviruses in crop plants are closely related to begomoviruses found in weeds [1, 19, 22]. Similar to what is observed for begomoviruses in crops, the species diversity of begomoviruses infecting weeds is very high [2, 10–12, 14, 17, 34, 35, 37]. For example, at least 15 begomoviruses are reported to infect Sida spp. [2, 9, 42]. The characterization of weed-infecting begomoviruses is therefore important in elucidating their ecological and evolutionary behavior [38]. In this report, we examine a begomovirus population present in Cleome affinis, an annual weed that belongs to the family Capparaceae and which is frequently present within or around fields of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and lima bean (P. lunatus) crops in northeastern Brazil.

S. J. C. da Silva et al. Table 1 Location, year of collection and full-length begomovirus clones obtained from Cleome affinis samples collected in five northeastern Brazilian states from 2007 to 2010 Sample code

Collection site

Year of collection

Clones (DNA-A)

Accession number

Alagoas state SC201

Paripueira

2009

BR:ALPar1:09A

JN103427

SC202

Maragogi

2009

BR:ALMar1:09A

HM195184

SC203

2009

BR:ALSmc1:09A

JN103435

SC205

Sa˜o Miguel dos Campos Maceio´

2010

BR:ALMac6:10A

JN103436

SC215

Atalaia

2007

BR:ALAta1:07A

JN103433

SC216

Rio Largo

2007

BR:ALRil:07A

JN103434

2010

BR:BACds1:10A

JN103439

2010

BR:PBAlh1:10A

JN103438

2010

BR:PEGoi1:10A

JN103437

BR:SEInd1:10A BR:SENps1:09A

JN103428

Bahia state SC207

Materials and methods

Costa do Sauı´pe Paraı´ba state

SC226

Alhandra

Sample collection Samples of Cleome affinis were collected during the years 2007 to 2010 in the states of Alagoas (AL), Bahia (BA), Paraı´ba (PA), Pernambuco (PE) and Sergipe (SE), all in northeastern Brazil (Table 1). Plants displaying symptoms of mosaic, yellowing and growth reduction typical of begomovirus infection were preferentially collected. Samples were desiccated by pressing and stored at room temperature.

Pernambuco state SC218

Goiana Sergipe state

SC208

Indiaroba

2010

SC209

Neo´polis

2009

SC210

Japoata˜

2009

BR:SEJpt1:09A

JN103430

DNA amplification and cloning

SC212

Neo´polis

2009

BR:SENps2:09A

JN103431

Total DNA was extracted according to Doyle and Doyle [6]. To confirm the presence of begomoviruses, PCR was carried out using universal primers for members of the genus [31]. Full-length viral genomes were amplified from PCR-positive samples by rolling-circle amplification (RCA) [20], cloned in pBLUESCRIPT KS ? (Stratagene) after monomerization with the restriction enzymes Cla I, Hind III or Pst I, and sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) by primer walking. Prior to cloning, RCA products were also cleaved with the 4-base cutter enzymes Msp I and Hae III in order to verify the presence of possible satellite DNAs, as reported by Paprotka et al. [28] for C. affinis samples from the state of Mato Grosso do Sul.

SC213

Neo´polis

2009

BR:SENps3:09A

JN103432

Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis DNA-A nucleotide sequences were subjected to a BLAST search for preliminary species assignment based on the

123

JN103429

All clones were classified as Cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) based on the ICTV-established criteria of 89% nucleotide sequence identity for the full-length DNA-A [9]

89% threshold level established by the Geminiviridae Study Group of the ICTV [9]. Additional nucleotide pairwise comparisons were performed with DNAMan version 4.0 (Lynnon Co.) using the Optimal Alignment option with the following parameters: Ktuple = 2, Gap penalty = 7, Gap open = 10, Gap extension = 5. Nucleotide sequences of begomoviruses used in the phylogenetic and recombination analyses (see Supplementary Table S1 for the full-length virus names and their respective GenBank accession numbers) were aligned using the Muscle module in MEGA 5 [40]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed by the neighbor-joining method

Begomoviruses infecting Cleome affinis in Brazil

implemented replications.

in

MEGA

5,

with

2,000

2207

bootstrap

Recombination analysis Phylogenetic network analysis for evidence of recombination was performed using the neighbour-net method implemented in SplitsTree4 [18]. Additional analysis of potential recombination events and identification of putative parental sequences was carried out using the Recombination Detection Program (RDP) ver. 3.0 [26]. Recombination events detected by at least four of the analysis methods available in the program were considered reliable. Alignments were scanned using default settings for each analysis method using a Bonferroni-corrected p value cutoff of 0.05. Genetic variability of the viral population The partition of genetic variability and inferences about population structure were based on Wright’s F fixation index [41]. The UST parameter was calculated with the program Arlequin 3.11 [7], using the Kimura 2-parameter distance and estimating statistical significance by permutation analysis with 1,000 replications. The main descriptors of genetic variability were quantified using the program DnaSP version 5 [36]: number of polymorphic sites, total number of mutations (g), average number of nucleotide differences (k), nucleotide diversity (p), number of haplotypes, haplotype diversity (Hd), number of segregating sites, Watterson’s estimate of the population mutation rate based on the total number of segregating sites (Theta-W) and on the total number of mutations (Theta-Eta). Four types of neutrality tests were used to test the hypothesis of occurrence of selection in the population: Tajima’s D, Fu and Li’s D* and F*, and the test based on the number of synonymous (Ds) and non-synonymous (Dns) substitutions with the Pamilo-Bianchi-Li (PBL) model.

Results Fourteen samples of Cleome affinis showing mosaic, yellowing and growth reduction were collected: six from the state of Alagoas, one each from the states of Bahia, Paraı´ba and Pernambuco, and five from the state of Sergipe (Table 1). All 14 samples tested positive for the presence of a begomovirus by PCR with universal primers (data not shown). No evidence of the presence of alphasatellites, or of any other kind of DNA satellite, was obtained after digestion with Msp I or Hae III. Fourteen full-length DNAA viral genomes were cloned (Table 1). Pairwise sequence

comparisons showed that all fourteen cloned viral genomes corresponded to isolates of cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV), with their nucleotide sequences displaying 91-96% identity with a recently described ClLCrV isolate from the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (FN435999) (Supplementary Table S2). In fact, clone BR:AL-Ata1:07 is the only one whose sequence shows 91% identity to ClLCrV, with the sequences of the remaining 13 clones displaying 95-96% identity (Supplementary Table S2). Besides, sequence identity between BR:AL-Ata1:07 and the other 13 isolates ranges from 93-94% (Supplementary Table S2), with most differences in the Rep gene and in the common region (data not shown). This indicates that BR:AL-Ata1:07 represents a distinct strain of ClLCrV, for which we propose the denomination ClLCrV-Ata. A neighbor-joining tree was constructed based on the complete DNA-A nucleotide sequences of the 14 ClLCrV isolates from C. affinis plus 22 Brazilian begomoviruses and additional sequences of begomoviruses from the Americas (Figure 1). The viruses clustered into five major groups. Groups I and V comprise only non-Brazilian viruses. Group II includes, in addition to viruses from other countries in the Americas, four begomoviruses from Brazil (abutilon Brazil virus, AbBV; euphorbia yellow mosaic virus, EuYMV; sida yellow leaf curl virus, SiYLCV; and tomato common mosaic virus, ToCmMV). Group III includes Brazilian begomoviruses and one virus from neighboring Argentina (soybean blistering mosaic virus, SoBlMV). All ClLCrV isolates grouped with the original ClLCrV isolate from Mato Grosso do Sul in group IV, which is placed at a basal position relative to clusters I-III. Recombination analysis Neighbor-net analysis indicated the occurrence of several recombination events among ClLCrV isolates and other Brazilian begomoviruses (Fig. 2A). Strong evidence for recombination was found in cluster I, represented by the 14 ClLCrV isolates and the isolate from Mato Grosso do Sul. Recombination events were also evident in other clusters (II, III and VI). These results were corroborated when the analysis was restricted to begomoviruses from C. affinis (Fig. 2B). The same sets of sequences were analyzed using the RDP3 package with the aim of investigating these putative recombination signals. A recombination event was detected for all 14 ClLCrV isolates, with breakpoints within the Rep coding region and tomato yellow spot virus (ToYSV) identified as one of the putative parents (Table 2). An additional recombination event was observed within the Rep gene for BR:AL-Ata1:07, with BR:AL-Ril1:07 identified as one of the parents (Table 2). A strongly supported recombination event was detected involving BR:AL-Ata1:07

123

2208

S. J. C. da Silva et al. b Fig. 1 Neighbor-joining tree based on the complete DNA-A nucleotide sequences of begomoviruses from the Americas, including the cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) isolates infecting Cleome affinis in northeastern Brazil (see Supplementary Table S1 for full virus names). Group IV includes all 14 ClLCrV isolates obtained in this study, plus the isolate from Mato Grosso do Sul (FN435999)

BDMV M88179

92

SGMCRV X99550 SGMHV Y11097 98

SiYVV

Y11099

SiYMYuV

DQ875872

OYMMV DQ022611

61

ToLCSV AJ608286 TLCCUV AM050143 96

WGMV DQ395343 ToMHV Y14874

59

CdTV AF101476

98

I

OYMoIV AY751753 ToMoTV AF012300 SiGYVV HQ009519

and BR:PB-Alh1:10, with breakpoints at the common region (CR) and the Rep coding region, and BR:ALPar1:09 identified as one of the putative parents (Table 2).

ToYDLV FJ174698

84

ToMoV L14460

72

SGMV AF049336 81 91

RhRGMV HM236370

73

AbMV X15983 MaGMV EU158096 CoYSV DQ875868

51

Genetic variability of the ClLCrV population

PYMPV Y15034 PYMV D00940

100

CLCrV AF480940

66

DesLDV DQ875870 ToCmMV EU710754

96 100

84

SiYLCV EU710750 AbBV FN434438 ToSLCV AF130415

58

RhGMSV DQ406672

93 100

CaLCuV U65529

58

PepGMV

U57457

BCaMV AF110189

96

EuMV_YP DQ318937

93 96

ToMYLCAV AY927277

75

EuYMV FJ619507

51

CuLCrV AF224760

54

100

SqMLCV AF421552 100

MCLCuV AY064391 100

SqLCV M38183

SiMoV AY090555

63 92

SiYMV AY090558 ToYSV DQ336350

88

OMoV EU914817 SimMV AJ557451

58

SiCmMV EU710751 62

ToLDV

83 100

EU710749

NDNV n.a.

79

ToMIMV EU710752

III

BGMV M88686

68 68 51

SiBV

FN436001

BlYSV

EU710756

SoBlMV EF016486

55 71

ToYVSV EF417915 TGMV K02029

52

PSLDV FJ972767

64

ToCMoV AF490004 ToRMV AF291705 99

ToSRV DQ207749 BR:AL-Ata1:07 ClLCrV FN435999 100

BR:PB-Alh1:10 99

BR:AL-Ril1:07 BR:AL-Par1:09

99

BR:AL-Smc1:09 99

BR:AL-Mac6:10 BR:SE-Ind1:10

78

II

Population subdivision analysis indicated that the 14 ClLCrV isolates comprised a single population, with no structuration based on geographical location or year of collection. The analysis of genetic descriptors demonstrated that the ClLCrV population has a high degree of genetic variability, which is considerably higher than those observed for two populations of tomato infecting begomoviruses from southeastern Brazil, and similar to that observed for a population of macroptilium yellow spot virus (MaYSV), a novel begomovirus described in the weed Macroptilium lathyroides, also in northeastern Brazil (Table 3). Evidence of selection or demographic forces acting on the ClLCrV population was assessed by four different neutrality tests. The four ORFs encoded by the DNA-A (Rep, Trap, Ren and CP) varied in this regard. Significant probability for rejecting the hypothesis of neutrality was found for the Rep ORF (Table 4), indicating that this genomic region is potentially under purifying selection. Negative values were obtained, but were not statistically supported, for Tajima’s D, Fu and Li’s D* and Fu and Li’s F* for Ren, Trap and CP (Table 4). However, a dN/dS \1 for all ORFs is indicative of purifying selection acting on this population.

IV

BR:SE-Nps3:09 BR:AL-Mar1:09 BR:SE-Nps1:09

54 66

Discussion

BR:SE-Nps2:09 BR:SE:Jpt1:09

98 BR:BA-Cds1:10 98 BR:PE-Goi1:10 100 99

TYCV FJ213931 CaLCuJV DQ178614 ToGMoV DQ520943

89

ToChLPV AY339618 MeMV AF068636 ToYMLCV AY508993

78 100

DiYMCUV AJ549960 DiYMV AF139168

V

BGYMV D00201

59

MaYMFV AY044135

100 98

MaYMV EF585290 MaMPRV AY044133 PHYVV

100 100

X70418

RhGMV EU339936 ToLCNDV U15015

0.05

123

Cleome affinis is classified in the family Capparaceae and is often present within and near fields of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and other leguminous crops in northeastern Brazil. Recently, a new begomovirus, cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) was found infecting this weed in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul [28]. Sequence analysis of the fourteen isolates obtained from C. affinis indicated 91-96% identity to the ClLCrV isolate from Mato Grosso do Sul. The ICTV guidelines propose a demarcation threshold of 89%

Begomoviruses infecting Cleome affinis in Brazil

Fig. 2 Phylogenetic evidence for recombination among: (A) all Brazilian begomoviruses, including the ones describes in this work, and (B) a population of cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) obtained from samples of Cleome affinis collected in five different states of

2209

northeastern Brazil. Neighbor-net analysis was performed using SplitsTree4. Formation of a reticular network rather than a single bifurcated tree is indicative of recombination

123

2210

S. J. C. da Silva et al.

Table 2 Putative recombination events detected among Brazilian begomoviruses, including the cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) isolates infecting Cleome affinis in northeastern Brazil Isolate

Parents

Breakpoints

P-value

Initial

Final

Rc

G

B

M

C

S

3S

BR:ALPar1:09

ToYSVa

2486b

2601

3.9 9 10-03

–d

3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:ALMar1:09

ToYSV

2190

2661

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:ALSmc1:09

ToYSV

2201

2659

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:ALMac6:10

ToYSV

2211

2674

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:BACds1:10

ToYSV

2290

2652

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:SEInd1:10

ToYSV

2207

2664

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:SENps1:09

ToYSV

2189

2660

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:SEJpt1:09

ToYSV

2201

2663

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:SENps2:09

ToYSV

2212

2660

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:SENps3:09

ToYSV

2201

2663

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:ALAta1:07

BR:ALPar1:09

18

1620

2.1 9 10-22

6.1 9 10-12

2.6 9 10-13

1.7 9 10-19

2.1 9 10-12

4.6 9 10-25

6.1 9 10-24

BR:ALRil1:07

1658

2007

4.6 9 10-08

2.7 9 10-08

2.0 9 10-11

2.6 9 10-03

3.1 9 10-05

1.6 9 10-16



ToYSV

2205

2663

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





-03



-02

3.3 9 10

1.3 9 10

-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:ALRil1:07

ToYSV

2201

2661

3.9 9 10

BR:PEGoi1:10

ToYSV

2201

2661

3.9 9 10-03



3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04





BR:PBAlh1:10

BR:ALPar1:09

17

1584

2.1 9 10-22

6.1 9 10-12

2.6 9 10-13

1.7 9 10-19

2.1 9 10-12

4.6 9 10-25

6.1 9 10-24

2112

2660

3.9 9 10-03

3.3 9 10-02

1.3 9 10-05

2.1 9 10-04



-

ToYSV a

When only the major parent is indicated, the minor parent has not been identified. ToYSV, tomato yellow spot virus

b

Numbering starts at the first nucleotide after the cleavage site at the origin of replication and increases clockwise

c

R, RDP; G, GeneConv; B, Bootscan; M, MaxChi; C, CHIMAERA; S, SisScan; 3S, 3SEQ

d

–, no recombination event detected

DNA-A sequence identity for begomovirus species, and 94% for their strains [9]. The sequence of clone BR:ALAta1:07 from Atalaia (AL) showed 91-94% identity to those of other ClLCrV isolates, indicating that this isolate represents a distinct strain, hereby named ClLCrV-Ata. A striking feature of the ClLCrV isolate from Mato Grosso do Sul was its association with an alphasatellite molecule (cleome leaf crumple virus-associated DNA1), one of two recent reports of DNA satellites in association with begomoviruses in the New World [28, 33]. A careful examination of the RCA products obtained from our C. affinis samples after digestion with 4-base cutter restriction

123

enzymes failed to indicate the presence of alphasatellites or of any other kind of DNA satellite. Phylogenetic analysis based on Brazilian and American begomoviruses placed ClLCrV in a basal group relative to all Brazilian begomoviruses, suggestive of an ancestral origin for this virus. It is noteworthy that phylogenetic inconsistency among the ClLCrV DNA-A and DNA-B components lead Paprotka et al. [28] to suggest that an ancient pseudorecombination event could be involved in the origin of this virus. We found evidence of multiple recombination events among the ClLCrV isolates. Recombination signals were

Begomoviruses infecting Cleome affinis in Brazil

2211

Table 3 Genetic variability of the cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) population obtained from C. affinis samples collected in five states of northeastern Brazil Population

N

Genome size

sc

Etad

ClLCrV

14

2756

253

267

MaYSV

a

ke

pf

hg

Hdh

hwi

h-Etaj

51.758

0.0191

14

1.0

0.0294

0.0311 0.0542

12

2658

402

419

150.177

0.0572

12

1.0

0.0537

ToCmMVb

22

2560

103

104

36.645

0.0143

20

0.987

0.0110

0.0111

ToYVSVb

26

2562

49

49

5.381

0.0021

25

0.997

0.0050

0.0050

a

Silva et al. [39]

b

Castillo-Urquiza et al. [3]

c

Total number of segregating sites

d

Total number of mutations

e

Average number of nucleotide differences between sequences (Tajima’s estimate of the population mutation rate, h)

f

Nucleotide diversity

g

Haplotype number

h

Haplotype diversity

i

Watterson’s estimate of the population mutation rate based on the total number of segregating sites

j

Watterson’s estimate of the population mutation rate based on the total number of mutations

Table 4 Results of the different neutrality tests for each open reading frame (ORF) in the DNA-A of isolates of cleome leaf crumple virus (ClLCrV) obtained from Cleome affinis samples collected in five states of northeastern Brazil ORFa

Tajima’s D

Fu and Li’s D*

Fu and Li’s F*

dN/dS 0.0228

Rep

-1.8653*

-2. 5503**

-2.71489*

Trap

-0.4477 (ns)b

-1.4769 (ns)

-1.3752 (ns)

0.0887

Ren

-1.3826 (ns)

-1.8803 (ns)

-1.9997 (ns)

0.3171

CP

-0.0972 (ns)

-1.0095 (ns)

-0.8731 (ns)

0.2124

* Significant at p \ 0.05 ** Significant at p \ 0.02 a

Rep, Replication-associated protein; Trap, Tans-activating protein; Ren, Replication enhancer protein; CP, Coat protein

b

ns, not significant at p [ 0.10

particularly strong for clones BR:AL-Ata1:07 and BR:PBAlh1:10, which always clustered separately of the other ClLCrV isolates in phylogenetic trees. Recombination breakpoints were identified primarily in the Rep coding region, a known hot spot for recombination among geminiviruses [24, 25]. It is interesting, though, that ClLCrV seems to be restricted to C. affinis, and also seems to be the only begomovirus associated with this host. Furthermore, it is not known if ToYSV, identified as one of the parents in the recombination event, is capable of infecting C. affinis. Parent identification in recombination analysis is obviously limited by the dataset used, and it is possible that the true viruses involved in these recombination events are either ancestral viruses that no longer exist or unknown viruses infecting distinct, unidentified hosts. Therefore, despite recombination frequently resulting in local adaptation, it is tempting to conclude that, at least in this specific virus-host system, it seems to be acting on the viral population without an obvious effect on its evolution. However, additional studies such as the biological characterization of

isolates from the two strains of ClLCrV (including their host ranges), should be carried out to test this hypothesis. In contrast to the low diversity of viruses found infecting C. affinis, the ClLCrV population displays a high degree of genetic variability, which is highlighted by the presence of unique haplotypes and high rates of nucleotide diversity and mutation (besides the aforementioned recombination events). These values were considerably higher than those observed for two populations of tomato-infecting begomoviruses from southeastern Brazil [3] and were similar to those observed for a MaYSV population obtained from Macroptilium lathyroides samples collected in northeastern Brazil [39]. Although additional studies are necessary to confirm this relationship, this presumptive higher genetic variability of weed-infecting begomoviruses compared to crop-infecting viruses suggests either that a longer co-evolution time leads to greater variability, or that viruses infecting hosts with a wider genetic base are allowed to diversify to a greater extent. Either way, it is reasonable to propose that weeds can act not only as virus reservoirs, but

123

2212

also as reservoirs of genetic variability, from which novel viruses can emerge following a host switch. On the other hand, the recombination analysis shows mostly inward recombination (other viruses contributing sequences to ClLCrV) instead of outward recombination (ClLCrV contributing sequences to other viruses). This could actually be constructed as a counterargument to C. affinis being a reservoir of crop viruses or contributing to crop virus diversity. Instead, it suggests that these viruses may be genetically isolated, as it has been reported for legume begomoviruses in Asia [29]. As mentioned above, ClLCrV seems to be restricted to C. affinis, which is further indication of a genetic isolation. However, a larger number of samples must be analyzed to confirm this observation. Results of several neutrality tests indicated that the Rep ORF is potentially under purifying selection. As Rep encodes the only protein essential for begomovirus replication, purifying selection may be acting to preserve its function. Purifying selection and population expansion were concluded to be the major evolutionary forces acting on a begomovirus in Eupatorium makinoi [43], on ToYVSV and ToCmMV in tomato [3], and on the tospovirus tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in peanut [23]. In summary, our results indicate a low species diversity of begomoviruses infecting C. affinis, but the single species detected seems to be ancestral to Brazilian begomoviruses, has a recombinant nature, and displays a high degree of genetic variability. Whether C. affinis is a source of novel (recombinant) viruses for crop plants or a host of a genetically isolated begomovirus remains to be determined. Further studies on the biological properties of ClLCrV (including its host range and vector transmission properties) as well as its ability to form viable pseudorecombinants with other begomoviruses should help to elucidate the role of this pathosystem in the ever increasingly complex epidemiological scenario of Brazilian begomoviruses.

S. J. C. da Silva et al.

3.

4.

5. 6. 7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Poliane AlfenasZerbini for critical review of the manuscript. This work was carried out under the framework of a CAPES PROCAD-NF (no. 93-2008) collaborative project among UFAL, UFRPE and UFV, and was additionally funded by FAPEMIG grants CAG-666-08 and CAG-949-09 to FMZ. GPCU was the recipient of a CAPES-PNPD postdoctoral fellowship.

15.

16. 17.

References 1. Andrade EC, Manhani GG, Alfenas PF, Calegario RF, Fontes EPB, Zerbini FM (2006) Tomato yellow spot virus a tomato-infecting begomovirus from Brazil with a closer relationship to viruses from Sida sp., forms pseudorecombinants with begomoviruses from tomato but not from Sida. J Gen Virol 87:3687–3696 2. Castillo-Urquiza GP, Beserra JEA Jr, Bruckner FP, Lima ATM, Varsani A, Alfenas-Zerbini P, Zerbini FM (2008) Six novel

123

18. 19.

20.

begomoviruses infecting tomato and associated weeds in Southeastern Brazil. Arch Virol 153:1985–1989 Castillo-Urquiza GP, Alfenas-Zerbini P, Beserra-Junior JEA, Mizubuti ESG, Varsani A, Martin DP, Zerbini FM (2010) Genetic structure of tomato-infecting begomovirus populations in two tomato-growing regions of Southeastern Brazil. In: Program and Abstracts, 6th International Geminivirus Symposium and 4th International ssDNA Comparative Virology Workshop, Guanajuato, Mexico Costa AS (1975) Increase in the populational density of Bemisia tabaci, a threat to widespread virus infection of legume crops in Brazil. In: Bird J, Maramorosch K (eds) Tropical diseases of legumes. Academic Press, New York, p 171 Costa AS (1976) Whitefly-transmitted plant diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14:429–440 Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15 Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinf Online 1:47–50 Faria JC, Bezerra IC, Zerbini FM, Ribeiro SG, Lima MF (2000) Current status of geminivirus diseases in Brazil (in Portuguese). Fitopatol Bras 25:125–137 Fauquet CM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Moriones E, Stanley J, Zerbini FM, Zhou X (2008) Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. Arch Virol 153:783–821 Fiallo-Olive E, Martinez-Zubiaur Y, Moriones E, Navas-Castillo J (2010) Complete nucleotide sequence of Sida golden mosaic Florida virus and phylogenetic relationships with other begomoviruses infecting malvaceous weeds in the Caribbean. Arch Virol 155:1535–1537 Frischmuth T, Engel M, Lauster S, Jeske H (1997) Nucleotide sequence evidence for the occurrence of three distinct whiteflytransmitted, Sida-infecting bipartite geminiviruses in Central America. J Gen Virol 78:2675–2682 Garcia-Andres S, Monci F, Navas-Castillo J, Moriones E (2006) Begomovirus genetic diversity in the native plant reservoir Solanum nigrum: Evidence for the presence of a new virus species of recombinant nature. Virology 350:433–442 Graham AP, Martin DP, Roye ME (2010) Molecular characterization and phylogeny of two begomoviruses infecting Malvastrum americanum in Jamaica: Evidence of the contribution of inter-species recombination to the evolution of malvaceous weedassociated begomoviruses from the Northern Caribbean. Virus Genes 40:256–266 Guo XJ, Zhou XP (2006) Molecular characterization of a new begomovirus infecting Sida cordifolia and its associated satellite DNA molecules. Virus Genes 33:279–285 Hagen C, Rojas MR, Sudarshana MR, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Natwick ET, Turini TA, Gilbertson RL (2008) Biology and molecular characterization of Cucurbit leaf crumple virus, an emergent cucurbit-infecting begomovirus in the Imperial Valley of California. Plant Dis 92:781–793 Hanssen IM, Lapidot M, Thomma B (2010) Emerging viral diseases of tomato crops. Mol Plant-Microbe Int 23:539–548 Hofer P, Engel M, Jeske H, Frischmuth T (1997) Nucleotide sequence of a new bipartite geminivirus isolated from the common weed Sida rhombifolia in Costa Rica. Virology 78: 1785–1790 Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254–267 Ilyas M, Qazi J, Mansoor S, Briddon RW (2010) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of begomoviruses infecting legumes in Pakistan. J Gen Virol 91:2091–2101 Inoue-Nagata AK, Albuquerque LC, Rocha WB, Nagata T (2004) A simple method for cloning the complete begomovirus genome

Begomoviruses infecting Cleome affinis in Brazil

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

using the bacteriophage phi 29 DNA polymerase. J Virol Met 116:209–211 Jones RAC (2009) Plant virus emergence and evolution: Origins, new encounter scenarios, factors driving emergence, effects of changing world conditions, and prospects for control. Virus Res 141:113–130 Jovel J, Reski G, Rothenstein D, Ringel M, Frischmuth T, Jeske H (2004) Sida micrantha mosaic is associated with a complex infection of begomoviruses different from Abutilon mosaic virus. Arch Virol 149:829–841 Kaye AC, Moyer JW, Parks EJ, Carbone I, Cubeta MA (2011) Population genetic analysis of Tomato spotted wilt virus on peanut in North Carolina and Virginia. Phytopathology 101:147–153 Lefeuvre P, Martin DP, Hoareau M, Naze F, Delatte H, Thierry M, Varsani A, Becker N, Reynaud B, Lett JM (2007) Begomovirus ‘melting pot’ in the south-west Indian Ocean islands: Molecular diversity and evolution through recombination. J Gen Virol 88:3458–3468 Lefeuvre P, Lett JM, Varsani A, Martin DP (2009) Widely conserved recombination patterns among single-stranded DNA viruses. J Virol 83:2697–2707 Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, Moulton V, Posada D, Lefeuvre P (2010) RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26:2462–2463 Morales FJ, Anderson PK (2001) The emergence and dissemination of whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses in Latin America. Arch Virol 146:415–441 Paprotka T, Metzler V, Jeske H (2010) The first DNA 1-like alpha satellites in association with New World begomoviruses in natural infections. Virology 404:148–157 Qazi J, Ilyas M, Mansoor S, Briddon RW (2007) Legume yellow mosaic viruses: genetically isolated begomoviruses. Mol Plant Pathol 8:343–348 ´ vila AC, Bezerra IC, Fernandes JJ, Faria JC, Lima Ribeiro SG, A MF, Gilbertson RL, Zambolim EM, Zerbini FM (1998) Widespread occurrence of tomato geminiviruses in Brazil, associated with the new biotype of the whitefly vector. Plant Dis 82:830 Rojas MR, Gilbertson RL, Russell DR, Maxwell DP (1993) Use of degenerate primers in the polymerase chain reaction to detect whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. Plant Dis 77:340–347 Rojas MR, Hagen C, Lucas WJ, Gilbertson RL (2005) Exploiting chinks in the plant’s armor: evolution and emergence of geminiviruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:361–394

2213 33. Romay G, Chirinos D, Geraud-Pouey F, Desbiez C (2010) Association of an atypical alphasatellite with a bipartite New World begomovirus. Arch Virol 155:1843–1847 34. Roye ME, McLaughlin WA, Nakhla MK, Maxwell DP (1997) Genetic diversity among geminiviruses associated with the weed species Sida spp., Macroptilium lathyroides, and Wissadula amplissima from Jamaica. Plant Dis 81:1251–1258 35. Roye ME, Spence J, McLaughlin WA, Maxwell DP (1999) The common weed Macroptilium lathyroides is not a source of cropinfecting geminiviruses from Jamaica. Trop Agric 76:256–262 36. Rozas J (2009) DNA sequence polymorphism analysis using DnaSP. Methods Mol Biol 537:337–350 37. Sanz AI, Fraile A, Garcı´a-Arenal F, Zhou X, Robinson DJ, Khalid S, Butt T, Harrison BD (2000) Multiple infection, recombination and genome relationships among begomovirus isolates found in cotton and other plants in Pakistan. J Gen Virol 81:1839–1849 38. Seal SE, Jeger MJ, Van den Bosch F (2006) Begomovirus evolution and disease management. Adv Virus Res 67:297–316 39. Silva SJC, Castillo-Urquiza GP, Hora-Ju´nior BT, Assunc¸a˜o IP, Lima GSA, Pio-Ribeiro G, Mizubuti ESG, Zerbini FM (2011) Species diversity, phylogeny and genetic variability of begomovirus populations infecting leguminous weeds in Northeastern Brazil. Plant Pathol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02543.x 40. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739 41. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associated Inc, Sunderland, Massachusetts 42. Wyant PS, Gotthardt D, Schafer B, Krenz B, Jeske H (2011) The genomes of four novel begomoviruses and a new Sida micrantha mosaic virus strain from Bolivian weeds. Arch Virol 156: 347–352 43. Yahara T, Ooi K, Oshita S, Ishii I, Ikegami M (1998) Molecular evolution of a host-range gene in geminiviruses infecting asexual populations of Eupatorium makinoi. Genes Genet Syst 73: 137–141 44. Zerbini FM, Andrade EC, Barros DR, Ferreira SS, Lima ATM, Alfenas PF, Mello RN (2005) Traditional and novel strategies for geminivirus management in Brazil. Australas Plant Path 34:475–480

123