THE VEGETARIAN THANKSGIVING. LOCAL SPICED PUMPKIN SOUP. APPLE SAGE STUFFING. SWEET TART CRANBERRY SAUCE. VEGETARIAN GRAV
... A. Hope Jahren d a Department of Biology, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, U.S.A. ... Final acceptance 6 August 2015. Available online .... in the assays for rate of travel, for nonthieves, we presented food to arbitrarily
Natufian Green Stone Pendants from el-Wad: Characteristics and Cultural Implications. Daniella E. Bar-Yosef ..... sector of Mount Lebanon which rises to over 3,000 m within 30 km of the coast .... the shelter but using it as a cemetery. Two later.
Il Torobo' when they were speaking in Masai to the interpreters. The term " ...... Cvidence (the Stillbay complex) were known to inhabit East Africa until, Murdock.
degrees of exposure to the market, Townsend. (1995) found that ..... clinic, though it has a primary school and a church. In mid-1995 Krausirpe had 479 people.
Jan 21, 2016 - with RFID pit tags that are installed subcutaneously on the animals and ... at: https://sonnybleicher.wordpress.com/data-repository-for-open-.
using Adobe Illustrator CS5. We assumed similar eye shapes ..... in the retina of the brush-tailed possum, Trichosurus vulpecula. J. Comp. Neurol. 177, 557-567.
The importance of dietary salt may explain why bees are often observed collecting ..... evaporation because it was in a shallow vessel (a bird bath) or in a.
Jun 8, 2014 - Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic ... Females selected foraging sites closer to refuge areas than males. ... Electronic supplementary material.
Sep 25, 2015 - The Periaykulam lake, Tiruchirappalli District, Tamil Nadu, India is one such habitat frequently ..... Common Loon (Gavia immer) nesting population. ... Third Edition. Harper and Row, New. York, pp. 800. Mahabal, A., 1991.
500. 1000. 1500. 0. 6. 12. 18. 24 mean loss (κ) of both individuals mean gain (γ) of both ... 500. 0. 0. 0.5 γa γa. 0. 0.5 Ïa Ïa. 0. 0.5 κa κa. 0. 0.5 Ïa Ïa. 0. 0.5 sa sa.
Figure S4a
IDENTICAL FORAGERS
1500
$#!!"
1500
$#!!"
1000
$!!!"
1000
500
500
$!!!"
#!!"
#!!"
0 0 !"
!"
%"
3.0 $&"
$'"
0 0 !"
6.0 &("
!"
1500
$!!!"
500
#!!"
0 !"
%"
2.0 $&"
$'"
4.0 &("
s.d. gain (#) of both individuals
1500 $#!!"
1000 $!!!"
500 #!!"
0 0 !"
!"
%"
$&"
$'"
0.5 !
&("
!
mean loss (!) of both individuals
1500 $#!!"
1000 $!!!"
500 #!!"
!"
0 !"
0.5 !a $&"
$'"
!a &("
$#!!"
1000
!"
%"
mean gain ("b) of individual B
1500
$#!!"
0
%"
$&"
2.0
$'"
&("
4.0
s.d. loss ($) of both individuals
mean number of times (± s.d.) individual A switches behaviour over 2,500 timesteps
mean number of times (± s.d.) focal individual switches behaviour over 2,500 timesteps
mean gain (") of both individuals
0
NON-IDENTICAL FORAGERS
1000
$!!!"
500
#!!"
0
!"
0 !"
0.5 "a $&"
$'"
"a &("
1500
$#!!"
1000
$!!!"
500
#!!"
0
!"
0 !"
%"
0.5 #a
$'"
0.5 $a
$'"
$&"
mean loss (!b) of individual B
#a
&("
1500
$#!!"
1000
$!!!"
500
#!!"
0
!"
0
1500
1500
1000
$!!!"
1000
500
500
$#!!"
%"
s.d. gain (#b) of individual B
!"
%"
$&"
s.d. loss ($b) of individual B
$a
&("
$#!!"
$!!!"
#!!"
#!!"
0 0 !"
!"
%"
$&"
48
$'"
&("
96
switchpoint (s) of both individuals
0 0 !"
!"
%"
0.5 sa $&"
$'"
switchpoint (sb) of individual B
sa
&("
Figure S4b
IDENTICAL FORAGERS
NON-IDENTICAL FORAGERS 1500
$#!!"
1000
$!!!"
500
#!!"
0 0 !"
!"
%"
mean number of times (± s.d.) individual B switches behaviour over 2,500 timesteps
$&"
$'"
!a &("
1500
$#!!"
results for identical foragers are identical to those given in Figure S4a
