Identification of Porcine Oocyte Proteins That Are Associated with

Download PDF
1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Comment
Jun 16, 2004 - matic cell nuclei, oocyte proteins were labeled with biotin ..... are based on 2-DE migration, and theoretical values (kDa/pl) are calculated from amino acid sequence. ... During the final maturational stages, translation of stored.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 1279–1289 (2004) Published online before print 16 June 2004. DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.103.027037

Identification of Porcine Oocyte Proteins That Are Associated with Somatic Cell Nuclei after Co-Incubation1 Susan Novak, Franc¸ois Paradis, Christian Savard, Karine Tremblay, and Marc-Andre´ Sirard2 Centre de Recherche en Biologie de la Reproduction, De´partement des Sciences Animales, Universite´ Laval, Sainte-Foy, Que´bec, Canada G1K 7P4 ABSTRACT Relatively little is known with respect to the oocyte proteins that are involved in nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells in mammals. The aim of the present study was to use a cell-free incubation system between porcine oocyte proteins and somatic cell nuclei and to identify oocyte proteins that remain associated with these somatic cell nuclei. In two separate experiments, porcine oocytes were either labeled with biotin to label total proteins at the germinal vesicle stage or metaphase II stage or they were labeled with 0.1 mM 35S-methionine either during the first 6 h or 22–28 h of in vitro maturation to characterize protein synthesis during two distinct phases. To determine which oocyte proteins associate with somatic nuclei, labeled proteins were incubated in a collecting buffer and energy-regenerating system with isolated ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei. After incubation, the nuclei were subjected to a novel affinity-binding system to recover biotin-labeled oocyte proteins or two-dimensional SDSPAGE for separation and visualization of radiolabeled proteins. Proteins of interest were sent for identification using either matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Of the proteins that remain associated with isolated nuclei after incubation, 4 were identified using the affinity-binding system and 24 were identified using mass spectrometry and the two-dimensional gel interface. This study has identified porcine oocyte proteins that associate with somatic cell nuclei in a cell-free system using proteomics techniques, providing a novel way to identify oocyte proteins potentially functionally involved in nuclear reprogramming.

gamete biology, gene regulation, oocyte development, ovum

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the mechanisms by which an oocyte is capable of reprogramming a differentiated cell and creating a new organism continues to be a challenge in reproductive biology. Relatively little is known with respect to the ability of the mammalian oocyte to reprogram the chromatin of a donor somatic cell. A few specific proteins have been identified that are involved in chromatin remodeling in mammals [1, 2]. In contrast however, much more is known from lower vertebrate studies using Xenopus oocyte extract, as nucleoplasmin, SWI-SNF complex, and others are impliSupported by the Conseil des Recherches en Peˆche et en Agroalimentaire du Que´bec (CORPAQ). Correspondence: Marc-Andre´ Sirard, De´partement des Sciences Animales, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Universite´ Laval, Sainte-Foy, PQ, Canada G1K 7P4. FAX: 418 656 3766; e-mail: [email protected] 1

2

Received: 6 January 2004. First decision: 20 February 2004. Accepted: 4 May 2004. Q 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc. ISSN: 0006-3363. http://www.biolreprod.org

cated in the removal of somatic histones and TATA-box binding protein (TBP) in nuclear remodeling assays [3]. Similar proteins, such as the human homologue and the BAF complex [4], have been found implicated in transdifferentiation of fibroblast cells by T cells [5]. In addition, there is little known in the mammalian oocyte due to the size and quantity of oocytes available for these types of studies. However, when donor nuclei are introduced into Xenopus oocytes, there is a large amount of protein from the oocyte that accumulates in the nuclei [6], indicating an involvement of oocyte proteins in nuclear reprogramming. A cell-free incubation system was developed in the pig to allow the study of interactions between the oocyte proteins and somatic cell nuclei in a mammalian system. To identify specific proteins that remained associated with somatic cell nuclei, oocyte proteins were labeled with biotin to identify them in nuclei after coincubation. We sought to identify these proteins using proteomics techniques; however, proteomics becomes less favorable as a method for protein identification when a very limited quantity of precious material is available, such as with mammalian oocytes. The inevitable losses incurred with two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis should be avoided if the goal is to optimize use of this precious material to identify proteins of physiological importance. Using limited material, our objectives were to develop a method for identification of proteins in low abundance. The method described in this article demonstrates how 2-D gel electrophoresis can be enhanced with the use of a labeling method for proteins, their subsequent purification using immunoprecipitation, and identification using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS). Oocyte maturation involves changes in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, which are necessary for the oocyte to undergo fertilization and subsequent embryonic development. At this time, the oocyte synthesizes a large amount of proteins from polyadenylated RNA that has been stored during oocyte growth [7]. Protein synthesis during meiotic maturation of the porcine oocyte is essential for appropriate pronuclear development during fertilization [8], implicating these newly synthesized proteins in the process of nuclear remodeling and reprogramming. Furthermore, there is only one report of live cloned piglets using in vitro-matured oocytes [9] compared with use of oocytes matured in vivo [10, 11], suggesting that the quality of oocyte maturation and, hence, appropriate protein synthesis plays a major role in nuclear reprogramming. Also, temporal differences in protein expression exist during maturation in vitro in the pig [8] and cow [12–14]. To elucidate some of these differences, we take advantage of a cAMP analogue to block nuclear progression of the porcine oocyte during the first part of maturation in vitro in the pig, to create two distinct maturational phases. Our objectives, therefore, are to iden-

1279

1280

NOVAK ET AL.

tify these newly synthesized proteins that accumulate in somatic cell nuclei with the goal to better understand the mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming. The oocyte proteins were labeled with radioactivity during two phases of maturation in vitro and those that remain associated with somatic cell nuclei after coincubation were identified using proteomics techniques and mass spectrometry.

medium, and returned to another 22 h of maturation in 500 ml maturation medium without hormones and db-cAMP. For collection of germinal vesicle (GV)-stage oocytes, the oocytes were denuded immediately after selection by vortexing for 10 min at medium speed in 100 ml of PBS (pH 7.5). For collection of metaphase II (MII)-stage oocytes, IVM oocytes were denuded in 0.01% hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich) in maturation medium by vigorous pipetting. The cumulus-free GV- and MII-stage oocytes were then washed three times in PBS and frozen immediately in a minimal volume of PBS at 2808C.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biotin Labeling of Oocyte Proteins

Preparation of Porcine Ovarian Epithelial-Like Cells and Isolation of Their Nuclei

Aliquots of frozen GV-stage and metaphase II (MII)-stage oocytes in a minimal volume of PBS (20 ml) were thawed for biotin labeling. Proteinase inhibitors were added immediately upon thawing (0.1 mg/ml pepstatin, 1 mg/ml leupeptin, 10 mg/ml PMSF), and the oocytes were subjected to repeated freeze-thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen. Once the oocytes were lysed as determined by examination under a dissection microscope, they were centrifuged at 10 000 3 g for 10 min, and the supernatant containing the oocyte proteins was removed and used for protein labeling. The oocyte proteins were labeled with 0.25 mg NHS-LC-Biotin in 12.5 ml DMSO according to the manufacturer’s directions (Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, IL), in a total reaction volume of 200 ml of PBS, pH 7.5, for 30 min at room temperature. The unreacted biotin was removed by centrifugation (5000 3 g, 20 min) through a 10 000 MW cutoff ultrafiltration unit (Millipore Ultrafree-MC, Billerica, MA). The protein mixture retained on the filter was washed in 200 ml PBS three times by recentrifugation. The oocyte proteins were recovered from the filter by washing a final time with 200 ml of collecting buffer (250 mM sucrose, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2-6H2O, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.01% polyvinyl alcohol) supplemented with an energy-regenerating system (ERS; 1 mM ATP, 1 mM GTP, 20 mM phosphocreatine, and 100 mg/ml creatine phosphokinase) [3], and centrifuging to a volume of 10 ml. Another 10 ml of collecting buffer with ERS was added to wash the filter, and the proteins were removed using a pipette. Cultured ovarian epithelial-like cells were used as controls for incubation with their own nuclei, to compare protein differences and identify those proteins specifically expressed in the oocyte. The epithelial-like cell proteins were labeled following the protocol exactly as described above.

The population of porcine ovarian epithelial-like cells used for this experiment was cells that grew inadvertently after collection and culture of porcine ovarian stromal cells. In brief, porcine ovaries were obtained from a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory in warm saline (378C). The ovaries were dissected and follicles and granulosa cells were removed. The interstitial (stomal) tissue from the ovary was exposed by scraping the ovary with a scalpel blade, it was then minced and rinsed in sterile saline. The tissue pieces were then digested in Hanks solution supplemented with 1 mM EDTA, 0.03%(w/v) collagenase, 0.012% (w/v) DNase, and 0.006% (w/v) trypsin for 30 min in a shaking water bath at 378C, and this digestion was repeated three times. Tissues were resuspended and allowed to pellet by gravity for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and washed in Hanks solution supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 200 3 g for 5 min, resuspended in wash medium, and recentrifuged a final time. The supernatant was removed and cells resuspended in culture medium (modified Eagle medium supplemented with 0.05 mg/ml gentamycin, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0.25 mg/ml amphotericin B, and 5% fetal calf serum) and seeded into culture flasks. The cell type predominant in culture showed cobblestonelike growth pattern and closely resembled ovarian surface epithelial cells. By the fourth passage, ovarian surface epithelial-like cells were the only cell type present. Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 38.48C and passaged when they reached 70% confluency. The cells were harvested and cryopreserved at the 12th passage, after the cells had been maintained for 48 h at 100% confluency. For cultured porcine ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei preparation, frozen aliquots of cells (1.5 3 106 cells) were thawed, resuspended in culture medium, and then prepared according to the protocol for suspension cell lines as outlined by the NucleiPure prep nuclei isolation kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Briefly, the cells were lysed using solution containing triton X-100, and the nuclei were purified by passage through a sucrose cushion by ultracentrifugation. Nuclei were visually checked for purity by staining with trypan blue and counted for recovery rate, which was typically between 50% and 85% nuclei of total cells at the start of the isolation procedure.

Oocyte Collection and In Vitro Maturation Prepubertal gilt ovaries were collected at a local abattoir and transported to the laboratory in a thermoflask at 25–308C in 0.9% saline containing antibiotics. The oocytes were then collected by aspiration of 3- to 6-mm follicles using an 18-gauge needle attached to a 10-ml disposable syringe into a 50-ml conical tube. The oocytes were allowed to sediment at room temperature for at least 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed twice with Tyrode lactate (TL)-HEPES medium supplemented with 0.01% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [15]. The medium used for oocyte maturation was North Carolina State University (NCSU)37 medium [16] supplemented with 10% porcine follicular fluid obtained by the puncture of follicles between 3 and 6 mm. All oocyte manipulations were performed in 0.01% PVA-TL-HEPES. Oocytes with an evenly granulated cytoplasm surrounded by compact cumulus cells were selected and were then either separated for recuperation of proteins from GV-stage oocytes or submitted to in vitro maturation (IVM) protocols. For IVM, the oocytes were washed three times in 500 ml maturation medium, which consisted of NCSU-37 medium supplemented with 00.1 mg/ml cysteine, 25 mM b-mercaptoethanol and 10% porcine follicular fluid. Groups of 50 oocytes were placed in 500-ml of maturation medium, preincubated in four-well multidishes (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) overlaid with 500 ml mineral oil at 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere at 38.48C. The oocytes were then incubated for the first 22 h with 10 IU/ml hCG (A.P.L., Ayerst, Montreal, Canada), 10 IU/ml eCG (Folligon, Intervet, Witby, Canada) and 1 mM of dibutyryl-cyclic AMP, then washed three times in maturation

Radioactive Labeling of De Novo-Synthesized Oocyte Proteins Groups of 50 oocytes were labeled with 0.1 mM 35S-methionine (Amersham Biosciences, Baie d’Urfe´, Que´bec, Canada) in 500 ml maturation medium during two distinct phases of maturation. For the first maturational phase (phase A), the oocytes were labeled during the first 6 h of in vitro maturation in the presence of 10 IU/ml PMSG, 10 IU/ml hCG, and 1 mM db-cAMP to keep oocytes in GV stage. After the 6-h maturation, oocytes were washed four times in 500 ml maturation medium and returned to culture in the presence of hormones and db-cAMP for another 16 h for the first maturation, then cultured for the remaining 22 h following our standard conditions. For the second maturational phase (phase B), the oocytes were matured without radioactivity for the first 22 h of maturation under the presence of 10 IU/ml eCG and 10 IU/ml hCG and 1 mM dbcAMP to block nuclear progression. At the start of the second maturational phase (phase B), groups of 50 oocytes were incubated with 0.1 mM 35Smethionine for 6 h in maturation medium without the db-cAMP block to allow oocytes to proceed from GV stage to MII. The oocytes were washed four times in maturation medium to remove radioactivity, then replaced for a further 18 h of culture in our standard conditions. Porcine oocytes were also cultured without radioactivity to serve as a control for quality of maturation. These experiments were repeated at least three times. After culture, all oocytes were denuded of their cumulus cells by vortexing in 100 ml PBS. The oocytes were then washed to remove cumulus cells three times in 500 ml PBS. Oocytes were then placed in a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged for 5 min at 2000 3 g. The supernatant was removed and 20 ml of collecting buffer supplemented with an energyregenerating system containing proteinase inhibitors (0.1 mg/ml pepstatin, 1 mg/ml leupeptin, 10 mg/ml PMSF) was added. The oocytes were lysed with repeated freeze-thaw cycles and centrifuged at 10 000 3 g for 10 min. The supernatant containing the oocyte proteins was then collected.

Incubation of Isolated Somatic Cell Nuclei and Labeled Oocyte Cytoplasmic Proteins To determine which oocyte proteins become associated with somatic cell nuclei, 20 ml of labeled proteins in collecting buffer and ERS (equiv-

PORCINE OOCYTE PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION alent of 150 radiolabeled oocytes or 500 biotin-labeled oocytes) were incubated with isolated ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei (500 for radiolabeled experiment, 1000 for biotin-labeled experiment) for 1.5 h at 288C. After incubation, the nuclei were centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 3 g and the supernatant removed. They were washed two times in collecting buffer by centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 3 g. To ensure that the oocyte proteins were associated with and not attached to the surface of the nuclei, biotinylated proteins were visualized in the nuclei after incubation using immunofluorescence (procedure described below). For verification of permeability of nuclei, fluoroscein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated IgG was incubated with the isolated nuclei and the nuclei were visualized using immunofluorescence.

Immunoblotting for Detection of Biotinylated Proteins Incubated nuclei were loaded onto 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gels with a sample of all biotinylated proteins (equivalent of 50 oocytes). The proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond ECL, Amersham Biosciences). The blots were then blocked in 5% skim milk TBS0.1% Tween-20 for 2 h, followed by incubation with 1:10 000 NeutravidinHRP antibody (Pierce) in blocking solution for 45 min. The blots were then rinsed three times for 5 min each with TBS-Tween, detected according to the manufacturer’s directions (ECL, Amersham Biosciences) and exposed to autoradiography film. Ovarian epithelial-like cell proteins served as controls for incubation with their own nuclei to compare against oocyte proteins. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Immunofluorescence Nuclei were incubated on prepared poly-L-lysine (.300 000 MW) coated coverslips for 30 min at room temperature (258C). The nuclei were then fixed and permeabilized in freshly prepared 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS with 0.3% Triton-X for 10 min. The coverslips were then washed two times in PBS for 5 min, and nonspecific binding sites on the coverslips were blocked with 5% skim milk in TBS-0.1% Tween-20 for 2 h. The coverslips were incubated with 1:100 Streptavidin conjugated with Alexa Fluor 594, and 1:100 DiOC6 (both obtained from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for visualization of the nuclear membrane, in blocking solution for 30 min, washed three times for 5 min each, mounted on microscope slides in mounting medium containing Mowiol, and sealed using fingernail polish. The nuclei were visualized using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Jena, Germany) equipped with neon and argon lasers.

Identification of Biotinylated Oocyte Proteins by Affinity Binding Ovarian epithelial-like cell proteins (5.0 3 106; equivalent to 1 mg of total protein) and oocyte proteins (10 000 GV-stage oocytes; equivalent to 1 mg total protein) were biotinylated using the protocol described above except with NHS-PC-LC-Biotin (Pierce), which is photocleavable by ultraviolet (UV) light. Due to the high lipid content of the oocytes, the proteins from a second 10 000 oocyte sample were precipitated with 10% trichloric acid, 80% acetone to remove the lipids before biotinylation. The biotinylated proteins in the presence of collecting buffer with ERS were then incubated for 1.5 h with ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei (20 000 per incubation). The nuclei were washed three times after incubation with 20 ml collecting buffer by repeated pelleting by centrifugation (1000 3 g, 5 min). The nuclei were then resuspended in 200 ml PBS and sonicated using an ultrasonicator (one pulse for 5 sec, setting 4) and put immediately on ice. The biotinylated proteins recovered from the nuclei were immunoprecipitated using 0.5 ml streptavidin-linked agarose beads (Immobilized Neutravidin; Pierce) on a rotating platform for 1 h. After incubation, the beads were washed three times with 500 ml PBS each time by centrifugation (1000 3 g, 5 min). The beads were then resuspended in 500 ml of 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate and transferred to a UV cuvette. The proteins were cleaved from the biotin-streptavidin bead complex using a UV transillumination box at wavelength 302 nm. The bead suspension was then transferred back to a microcentrifuge tube and the beads were pelleted by centrifugation (1000 3 g, 5 min). The supernatant containing the purified proteins was removed and the beads were washed one final time with 300 ml 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The recuperated proteins in solution were then subjected to LC-MS/MS (Eastern Quebec Proteomics Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite´ Laval, PQ, Canada).

1281

Visualization of De Novo-Synthesized Proteins Using 2-D Gel Electrophoresis Incubated washed nuclei (proteins from 150 oocytes), along with samples of total radiolabeled proteins from a total of 50 oocytes, were separated using two-dimensional SDS-PAGE techniques. The nuclei and cytoplasmic proteins were solubilized in a rehydration buffer (8 M urea, 2% Chaps, 0.5% pharmalyte, pH 3–10, 2.8 mg/ml dithiothreitol) for 1 h before loading on 13-cm Immobiline drystrips, pH 3–10 (Amersham Biosciences), overnight on an IPGphor apparatus (Amersham Biosciences) for separation of the proteins in the first dimension. The separation program included a 12-h rehydration at 30 V, 1 h at 500 V, 1 h at 1000 V, and 2 h at 8000 V. After focusing, strips were equilibrated for 15 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M urea, 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, and bromophenol blue, and loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE gels to separate proteins according to their molecular weight. The gels were then fixed overnight in 50% methanol, dried, and exposed to autoradiography film (Kodak BioMax) for 1 mo at 2808C for incubated nuclei or for 1 wk in Phosphoimager cassettes (Amersham Biosciences) for total radiolabeled proteins. Proteins were analyzed using ImageMaster software (Amersham Biosciences) to match spots between the gels. An average gel was made from the best two replicates, and only proteins that were common to the gels were used in the analysis. Each individual gel containing proteins remaining in incubated nuclei was cross-matched with its corresponding total protein synthesis gel to ensure that the matches using the averaged gels were accurate.

Total Oocyte Proteins for Identification For identification of the proteins that were associated with isolated ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei, equivalent nonradioactive gels were run using larger quantities of oocytes (4600 GV-stage oocytes and 4800 MIIstage oocytes). For each gel, due to the high lipid content of oocytes, the oocyte proteins had to be extracted using a 10% TCA, 80% acetone precipitation. In brief, oocytes were sonicated using a microtip sonicator at power setting 4 for 5 sec in 100 ml PBS containing proteinase inhibitors. Three volumes of ice-cold 10% TCA and 80% acetone were added to the lysed oocytes and incubated for 45 min at 2208C. The mixture was then centrifuged for 30 min at 10 000 3 g at 48C. The supernatant was removed, and the protein pellet was washed once with ice-cold acetone. The pellet was allowed to dry and immediately solubilized in rehydration buffer (8 M Urea, 4% Chaps, and 0.8% pharmalytes, pH 3–10, 2.8 mg/ml dithiothreitol) for 2 h at room temperature before loading the sample onto 13 cm linear, pH 3–10, Immobiline strips for the first dimension. Due to the high protein load, the focusing time was extended and a gradual increase in voltage was used. The program included a 12-h rehydration at 30 V, 100 V for 1 h, 250 V for 1 h, 500 V for 1 h, 1000 V for 1 h, 2000 V for 1 h, 4000 V for 2 h, and 8000 V, for a total of 16 000 V-h to reach a total focusing time of 28 150 V-h. After focusing, strips were equilibrated for 15 min in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M urea, 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, and bromophenol blue, and loaded onto 10% SDS-PAGE gels to separate proteins according to their molecular weight. The resulting gel was then fixed overnight and proteins visualized using Bio-Safe Coomassie Blue (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Spots between the radioactive and nonradioactive gels were matched with the aid of analysis software (Imagemaster, Amersham Biosciences) and gel plugs containing the proteins of interest were excised by hand and sent for peptide mass fingerprinting (Eastern Quebec Proteomics Centre) for identification using either matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionizationtime of flight (MALDI-TOF) or LC-MS/MS.

Protein Identification by MALDI-TOF and LC-MSMS All protein identifications were performed at the Eastern Quebec Proteomics Centre. Tryptic digestions of the proteins were performed on a MassPrep liquid handling robot (Micromass, Manchester, England) according to the manufacturer’s specifications and using sequencing-grade modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI). Peptide tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) were obtained by capillary liquid chromatography coupled to an LCQ DecaXP (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA) quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer with a nanospray interface. An aliquot of the digested protein sample was diluted to 5 ml with 0.1% formic acid and loaded onto a reversed-phase column (PicoFrit 15 mm tip, BioBasic C18, 10 cm 3 75 mm; New Objective, Woburn, MA). Peptides were eluted from the column with a linear gradient of wateracetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of approximately 250 nl/ min. Mass spectra were acquired using a data-dependent acquisition mode in which each full-scan mass spectrum was followed by collision-induced

1282

NOVAK ET AL.

FIG. 1. Confocal microscopy images at 3400 magnification of nuclei incubated with unlabeled oocyte proteins (1) and nuclei incubated with biotin-labeled oocyte proteins (2). The nuclear membrane is visualized by fluorescence staining using DiOC6 (1a and 2a), and biotinylated oocyte proteins are revealed with Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 594 (1b and 2b). 2c) A composite image of 2a and 2b obtained by the confocal microscope.

dissociation of the three most intense ions. The dynamic exclusion function was enabled, and the relative collisional fragmentation energy was set to 35%. Resulting peptide MS/MS spectra were interpreted using the SEQUEST algorithm [17] and searched against proteins in the NCBI nonredundant protein database. Partial carboxamidomethylation of cysteine and oxidation of methionine were considered in the search. Confident identification of a peptide required a cross-correlation score of 1.9, 2.5, and 3.7 for singly, doubly, and triply charged peptides, respectively. Each peptide identification was confirmed by manual inspection of the spectrum. For MALDI-TOF analysis, in-gel tryptic digestion was performed as described above. The peptides were extracted from the gel into 50% acetonitrile:water, lyophilized in a speed vacuum, and resuspended in 3ml of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid solution. The peptide sample solution was then combined with an equal volume of matrix (a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, 20 mg/ml in 50% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) and spotted onto a MALDI sample plate. The sample:matrix solution was allowed to air dry at room temperature and was then washed three times with 2 ml of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Mass spectra were acquired on a Voyager-DE PRO MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) operating in the positive-ion reflector delayed-extraction mode. Protein identifications were obtained using either ProFound (version 4.10.5, The Rockefeller University, http://prowl.rockefeller.edu/cgi-bin/ProFound) or MASCOT (http://www.MatrixScience.com) and searching the nonredundant NCBI protein database for matching peptide mass fingerprints. The search criteria used were complete carboxamidomethylation of cysteine, partial methionine oxidation, and mass deviation smaller than 60 ppm.

Immunoblotting for Detection of GRP-78 Oocyte extract (equivalent of 200 oocytes), ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei (2000 nuclei), nuclei after incubation with oocyte proteins (equivalent of 1000 oocytes incubated with 2000 nuclei), and the supernatant from the incubation, along with a positive control for GRP 78 were loaded onto 10% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gels. The proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond ECL, Amersham Biosciences). The blots were then blocked in 1% skim milk TBS-0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) for 2 h, followed by incubation with 1:2000 GRP 78 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) in TBS-T for 45 min. The blots were then rinsed three times for 5 min each with TBS-T and then incubated with 1:5000 goat anti-mouse-conjugated HRP secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) in TBS-T for 30 min. The blots were then rinsed 1 3 15 min and 3 3 5 min, and then the signal was detected according to the manufacturer’s directions (ECL, Amersham Biosciences) and exposed to autoradiography film.

RESULTS Detection of Biotinylated Proteins Nuclei were observed at the end of the incubation period, with biotinylated proteins localized inside the nuclei

FIG. 2. Representative immunoblots of total biotinylated proteins (T) and total biotinylated proteins (I) retained in isolated ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei from ovarian epithelial-like cells (control), GV-stage oocytes, and MII-stage oocytes. The relative proportion of proteins changes from before incubation to after incubation, as noted by comparison of retention of proteins in nuclei A1, A2, and A3 and B1, B2, and B3. Both A1 and B1 are not abundantly present after incubation; however, A2, A3, B2, and B3 all appear to be selectively retained in the incubated nuclei.

as shown by immunofluorescence techniques (Fig. 1). Nonincubated nuclei and nuclei incubated with unlabeled oocyte proteins were negative for staining with streptavidin (Fig. 1). The nuclei were judged as permeabilized by uptake of trypan blue dye and uptake of IgG-FITC after incubation with nuclei (data not shown). Biotinylation of total proteins in ovarian epithelial-like cells, GV-stage oocytes, and MII-stage oocytes resulted in immunopositive bands on the Western blots (Fig. 2). Nonbiotinylated oocyte proteins and nuclei loaded onto the gels resulted in no visible bands after immunodetection (data not shown). The proteins labeled by the biotin varied greatly between epithelial-like cells, GV-stage oocytes, and MIIstage oocytes (Fig. 2). Different bands retained within the nuclei were seen in MII-stage oocytes as compared with GV-stage oocytes, implicating synthesis of new proteins during in vitro maturation that become associated with somatic nuclei. In addition, the profiles of proteins from somatic cells differ from oocytes, showing cell-type specificity. A large proportion of the labeled proteins remained associated with the nuclei after incubation, regardless of cell type. This selection does not seem to simply be concentration dependent, as some proteins appear to be selectively retained by the nuclei. As shown in Figure 2, the relative proportion of an observed protein to total proteins present before incubation changes when compared with the relative amount of the protein retained by the nuclei after incubation. Identification of Biotinylated Oocyte Proteins by Affinity Binding The LC-MS/MS procedure resulted in four peptides that matched with known sequences in the ovarian epithelial-

1283

PORCINE OOCYTE PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION

TABLE 1. Protein identification by LC-MSMS, biotin-labeled ovarian epithelial-like cell cytoplasmic proteins recovered from isolated cultured epitheliallike cell nuclei after coincubation. Protein name Hypothetical protein Alpha-tubulin cAMP-dependent protein kinase, alphacatalytic subunit (PKA C-alpha) Actin

Species

Sequence used for ID

size (kDa)

GenBank accession no.

Homo sapiens Sus scrofa Sus scrofa

ISPHLAGAKSLGGGGKK LISQIVSSITASLR RFGNLKNGVNDIK

21.82 50.08 40.62

29729215 135435 547756

Sus scrofa

VAPEEHVLLTEAPINPK

41.63

113307

like cell sample (Table 1). However, in the two oocyte samples performed in this experiment, each with 10 000 oocytes, the technique was not sensitive enough to detect any peptides, even when the samples were combined for a total of proteins retained in incubated nuclei from 20 000 oocytes. The affinity-binding method did, however, improve limitations imposed by protein separation on gels, as proteins were successfully identified from the somatic cell samples that were otherwise not detectable on SDS-PAGE gels by colloidal Coomassie-blue staining (data not shown). From results obtained in our lab, we determined, by using BSA as a standard, that, if the protein spot was not visible after staining with colloidal Coomassie Blue, this was below sensitivity limits for protein identification by MALDITOF (data not shown). Detection of Radiolabeled Proteins by 2-D Gel Electrophoresis

The profiles of proteins synthesized during the first 6 h of maturation with the db-cAMP block (phase A) and the

first 6 h of maturation without the db-cAMP block (phase B) are shown in Figure 3. We have visualized 208 proteins synthesized during phase A and 189 proteins synthesized during phase B based on analysis using Imagemaster software. The patterns of proteins synthesized during these two stages is very different, as only 46 of the proteins (22.1%) synthesized during phase A continued to be synthesized during phase B. The identity of several of these proteins is known, based on the sequencing of proteins from equivalent nonradioactive gels (Fig. 4 and Table 2). Nine of the identified proteins were not found to be present in GV-stage oocytes (Table 3). When the oocyte proteins labeled during phase A and phase B of porcine oocyte maturation were incubated with somatic cell nuclei, the oocyte proteins retained in the nuclei were detected (Fig. 3). Overall, there were 35 proteins synthesized during phase A that were found to remain associated with somatic cell nuclei, where 23 of these proteins have been identified (Tables 2 and 3). Of those proteins synthesized during the second phase of maturation, 15 FIG. 3. Representative autoradiographs of oocyte proteins labeled with 35S during in vitro maturation. Shown are total de novosynthesized proteins during cytoplasmic (A) and nuclear (B) maturation in vitro. The proteins that remain associated after incubation with somatic cell nuclei from oocytes labeled during cytoplasmic maturation are shown in C and nuclear maturation in D. The proteins numbered have been identified on equivalent nonradioactive gels, and their numbers correspond to those proteins in Table 1.

1284

NOVAK ET AL.

have a corresponding protein present in mature oocytes. This is probably due to the sensitivity of the radioactive label-detecting proteins that are specifically synthesized during a particular stage during maturation, however, present in low abundance in oocytes. Verification of one of these proteins, GRP-78, by Western blot analysis demonstrated that this protein is not present in nuclei before incubation with oocyte cytoplasm but enters into the nuclei after incubation (Fig. 5). DISCUSSION

FIG. 4. Two-dimensional protein gel of MII-stage porcine oocytes. Proteins were separated on the basis of pI (x-axis) and relative molecular mass (Mr 3 1023), which is indicated on the y-axis. Numbered spots were identified by mass spectrometry and the numbers correspond to the proteins in Table 1.

proteins remain associated with somatic cell nuclei and 14 of these proteins have been identified (Tables 2 and Table 3). Comparisons across gels determined that 13 of the 35 proteins from phase A that remained associated with epithelial-like cell nuclei continued to be synthesized during the latter part of maturation. The proteins (12 from cytoplasmic maturation and 1 from nuclear maturation) that were not identified did not

The concept of oocyte developmental competence, or which factors an oocyte possesses to enable it to be fertilized and develop into an embryo, are poorly understood. During the final maturational stages, translation of stored mRNA occurs to stockpile protein to support fertilization and embryonic development until the activation of the embryonic genome, which, in the pig, occurs at the four-cell stage. Protein synthesis is essential for completion of meiosis and pronuclear development in the pig [8], indicating that these newly synthesized proteins are important for developmental capability. The oocyte proteins responsible for successful embryo development are also implicated in the ability of the oocyte to reprogram a somatic cell in nuclear transfer procedures. If we can better understand the process of nuclear reprogramming, improvements in cloning and in vitro-maturation procedures can be realized more rapidly. In efforts to understand which oocyte proteins are implicated in nuclear reprogramming, we have developed a simple cell-free incubation system and identified oocyte proteins that remain associated with isolated somatic cell nuclei using proteomics techniques. Although it remains to be tested whether this incubation system is capable of reprogramming nuclei, there are a few factors that have been considered. As a result of labeling the oocyte proteins, the oocyte extract was activated before incubation with somatic nuclei. Activation of the oocyte results in a reduction of maturation promoting factor, which

TABLE 2. Identities of proteins represented on the two-dimensional gel of porcine oocytes at MII stage. Proteins were identified by either MALDI-TOF or LC-MSMS. Observed molecular mass (kDa) are based on 2-DE migration, and theoretical values (kDa/pl) are calculated from amino acid sequence. Spot no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Protein name GRP 78/BiP protein HSC 70 GRP 75/HSP 74/mortalin HSP 60 GRP 58, thioredoxin Annexin 1 F1-ATPase Desmin Initiation factor 4AII Beta actin Spermidine aminopropyltransferase Hypothetical protein Galactokinase I Lisch7 Annexin V Elongation factor 1 peptide (EF-1 delta) UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1) Major vault protein Endoplasmic reticulum luminal protein (ERP 28) GTP-binding protein cdc-42 Hypothetical protein FLJ20420 Apolipoprotein A-1 DJ-1 DJ-1

Type of analysis

Observed kDa

Theoretical kDa/pI

% Coverage

GI accession

MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF LC-MSMS LC-MSMS LC-MSMS MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF LC-MSMS MALDI-TOF LC-MSMS LC-MSMS MALDI-TOF LC-MSMS MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF LC-MSMS

85 80 81 60 60 46 45 43 39 42 40 43 41 31 36 35 27 27 28 21 24 23 22 21

71/5.2 71.1/5.4 73.8/5.9 58/5.35 57.2/5.9 38.5/6.5 51.5/5.0 52.6/5.2 46.6/5.3 41.7/5.3 39.9/4.8 38.8/6.1 42.3/6 38/6.8 36/5.0 31.1/4.9 33.4/6.7 19.2/5.2 30/6.8 24.6/5.1 26.1/8/5 30.3/5.38 19.8/6.33 19.8/5.8

41 27 10 22 27 26 34 21 30 33 18 14.2 6.2 24 30 7.5 27 45.6 8.2 36 8.8 24 50 24.9

6470150 746850 14917005 129379 21361657 20141168 3660251 6166115 485388 15277502 2198557 7513076 4503895 1236085 999926 20141357 13022115 5851638 5803013 7245833 8923390 423201 6005749 6005749

1285

PORCINE OOCYTE PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION TABLE 3. The temporal synthesis of identified proteins in oocytes and their association with somatic nuclei after incubation. Cytoplasmic maturation Protein Annexin 1 Major vault protein Elongation factor 1 peptide (EF-1 delta) cdc-42 Hypothetical protein FLJ20420 Apolipoprotein A-1 Desmin F1-ATPase Initiation factor 4AII DJ-1 (both isoforms) Lisch7 GRP 78/BiP protein HSC 70 HSP 60 GRP 58, thioredoxin GRP 75/HSP 74/mortalin Beta-actin Spermidine aminopropyltransferase Hypothetical protein Galactokinase 1 Annexin V UDP-glucuronosyltransferase Endoplasmic reticulum luminal protein (ERP 28)

Present in Synthesized somatic nuclei Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y — Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

facilitates the remodeling of nuclear structure [18]. It is believed to be important to expose somatic chromatin to oocyte cytoplasm arrested in MII to allow time for the chromatin to be remodeled. However, nuclear transfer has been successful using enucleated, activated oocytes in cattle [19– 21], suggesting that the oocyte cytoplasmic proteins used in this experiment would be capable of reprogramming the nuclei. Furthermore, most frog oocyte extracts are derived from eggs or activated oocytes [22–24]. The chosen incubation temperature for the current experiment was 288C, which seems appropriate for cell-free incubation systems. It has been suggested that nuclear import assays in mammalian cell-free extracts are to be conducted at 308C [25]. Furthermore, another mammalian cellfree system using T cell extracts conducted incubations at 308C, and it was shown to be capable of reprogramming nuclei [5]. The nuclei used in this experiment were permeabilized to facilitate nuclear import, as evidenced by the presence of fluorescence-labeled immunoglobin G (150 kDa) in the nuclei. Permeabilized nuclei have been used to investigate nuclear remodeling in Xenopus egg extracts [3], and it has been demonstrated that loss of the integrity of the nuclear envelope was essential for replication in terminally differentiated nuclei when exposed to Xenopus egg extracts [26]. However, use of intact nuclei has resulted in reprogramming of fibroblasts in vitro [5]. This mammalian system provides a way to observe interactions between somatic cells and the oocyte. An advantage of this system compared with nuclear-transfer procedures to elucidate these interactions is that the oocyte extract may contain important nuclear proteins that are otherwise removed by conventional enucleation procedures. A good example may be the inadvertent removal of the oocyte-specific linker histone H1oo, which localizes to chromatin upon oocyte maturation [2] or mitotic spindle components [27]. Using this cell-free incubation system, our objectives were to identify porcine oocyte proteins that remained as-

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y — Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Nuclear maturation Present in Synthesized somatic nuclei — — — — — — — Y Y — — Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

— — — — — — — Y Y — — — — — — Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Present in oocytes GV stage — — — — — — — — — Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

MII Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

sociated with isolated cultured somatic cell nuclei after coincubation. The use of proteomics for discovery of proteins is currently limited to the more abundant proteins in a sample or to those situations where a protein can be purified in larger quantities. However, many of the proteins that are of interest in physiology may exist in very small quantities, thus demanding the development or use of sensitive techniques in proteomics for their identification. We developed a technique that allows for the use of small quantities of protein that involved labeling the oocyte proteins with biotin, enabling their identification and separation from unlabeled somatic cell nuclear proteins after coincubation by affinity binding. The purified protein mixture was directly injected into an ion trap mass spectrometer for identification of the proteins using LC-MS/MS. A similar approach has been used to reveal novel roles for cortactin by isolation of cortactin-interacting proteins [28] and to find modifications in expression of phosphorylated polypeptides related to the Scott syndrome phenotype [29]. However, with these studies, the availability of protein was not a limiting factor and immunoprecipitation techniques were combined with 2-DE for separation of proteins. The affinity-binding procedure poses a novel way of purifying and identifying the proteins that remain associated

FIG. 5. Western blot of verification of GRP 78 in oocytes and in nuclei after incubation with oocyte proteins. Lane 1: GRP 78 positive control; lane 2: oocyte cytoplasm before incubation; lane 3: ovarian epitheliallike cell nuclei before incubation; lane 4: ovarian epithelial-like cell nuclei after incubation; lane 5: nothing; lane 6: supernatant from incubation.

1286

NOVAK ET AL.

with somatic cell nuclei during coincubation. Although we were not successful in identifying oocyte proteins, the ovarian epithelial-like cell incubation with their own nuclei resulted in a positive identification of several proteins. The lack of success with the oocyte sample should not be due to lack of protein in the initial protein mixture, as both the ovarian cell sample and oocyte sample contained 1 mg of starting material. It is possible that the high lipid content in porcine oocytes may be problematic with this method, as it may interfere with the incubation or recuperation of proteins, and further tests are warranted. This technique is also more sensitive compared with traditional protein identification methods involving proteins recovered off gels or membranes, as it limits the losses associated with gel preparation, in-gel digestion, and protein modification by staining methods. Successful identification of several proteins was achieved with this technique, even when the proteins were not abundant enough to be visible on a SDS-PAGE gel (data not shown). Identification of the proteins from the affinity-binding technique provided interesting results and demonstrated that novel proteins and insights may be discovered by this method. We have identified one of the proteins as the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) C-alpha, which functions to phosphorylate proteins using ATP. It is present in both porcine granulosa cells [30] and porcine oocytes [31], and when activated, the catalytic subunit is translocated to the nucleus of the cell. The C-alpha isoform of PKA efficiently activates cAMP-response element (CRE)regulated genes, and its activation compared with the Cgamma isoform may provide a means to diversify cell phenotypes [32]. The activation of the transcription factor CRE-binding protein by PKA causes the recruitment of the CREB-binding protein and p300, which are histone acetyltransferases involved in chromatin remodeling [33]. Actin was also identified using the affinity-binding technique. Actin is a very abundant cytosolic protein; however, increasing evidence suggests that it is linked to various nuclear processes ranging from chromatin remodeling to transcription to RNA splicing [34]. Actin is an integral component of a nuclear remodeling complex, BAF, and is required for the association of BAF with chromatin [4]. Furthermore, a functional mammalian nuclear reprogramming system has identified the involvement of BAF and actin in the transdifferentiation of fibroblast cells to express T cell functions [5]. Alpha-tubulin is also a protein that is purely cytoplasmic [35], and its presence in nuclei has been considered to be cytoplasmic contamination during preparation of isolated Xenopus laevis nuclei [36]. However, because the epithelial-like cell nuclei were not labeled with biotin, any protein originating from or associated with the nuclei before incubation would not have been recovered during the affinitybinding procedure; therefore, we believe that the presence of alpha-tubulin was not due to contamination. In addition, a study by Shin et al. [37] demonstrated an appearance of microtubule asters in association with decondensed chromosomes in nuclei after nuclear transfer into enucleated oocytes. This strongly suggests the presence of alpha-tubulin in nuclei incubated with cytoplasmic proteins is not an artifact or contamination. In this study, we also sought to identify some of the de novo-synthesized oocyte proteins during in vitro maturation. Oocyte maturation involves two types of maturational stages; cytoplasmic maturation that involves reorganization of the cytoskeleton, which enables normal fertilization and

further embryonic development, and also nuclear maturation, in which meiosis continues until arrest at the MII stage. One of the advantages of our in vitro system is the use of a db-cAMP block to arrest nuclear maturation during the first part of oocyte maturation in vitro, creating distinct maturational phases. The protein profiles on the 2-D gels presented two distinct patterns between the two maturational phases, as only 22% of the proteins synthesized during phase A continued to be synthesized during phase B. Similar proportions were observed during maturation in the bovine oocyte in vitro, as 16% of the proteins were synthesized throughout the 28-h in vitro maturation as analyzed by 2-D gel electrophoresis [13]. Interestingly, although Ding et al. [8] observed that inhibition of protein synthesis throughout porcine in vitro maturation impeded GVBD and pronuclear formation, protein synthesis during the period of 24–36 h of a 48-h maturation period was essential for male pronuclear formation in the pig, which roughly corresponds to our phase B. This suggests that the proteins synthesized during progression from GV stage to MII stage may play an important role in oocyte developmental competence. The identified proteins that were associated with somatic nuclei were usually among the most abundant proteins present in GV stage- and MII-stage oocytes. This is a drawback of protein identification using proteomics, as a large quantity of protein is necessary for an identification using mass spectrometry. Interestingly, another proteomics study investigating the proteins expressed at specific stages of mouse embryo development also identified GRP 78 and HSC 70 [38], and GRP 78 was also identified on the surface of the mouse egg using proteomics [39], most likely all due to relative abundance. It is indeed possible that some of the proteins responsible for nuclear reprogramming are only present in small quantities in the oocyte and therefore would not have been chosen for identification. There were 12 proteins synthesized during phase A and 1 protein synthesized during phase B for which there were no matches present in MII oocytes, possibly due to low copy number. This is one of the first studies to identify a large number of proteins synthesized and present in the oocyte using proteomics, demonstrating the power of this technique even in the oocyte where sample availability is a limiting factor. Currently, there are very few studies published in reproduction using proteomics techniques. Greene et al. [38] identified 42 proteins that were differentially expressed in neurulating mouse embryos. Also, mouse egg surface proteins are being characterized using proteomics in the search for new contraceptives [40]. In this study, we have identified 24 newly synthesized proteins during oocyte maturation that become associated with somatic nuclei. Beta-actin was identified as one of the proteins associated with somatic nuclei, which confirms our findings with the affinity-binding technique. A few of the proteins identified in this study demonstrate oncogenic properties, specifically DJ-1, annexin I, and elongation factor-1 (EF-1) delta. One of the oncogenic proteins that were found to only be synthesized during the first part of maturation was identified as DJ-1. DJ-1 can transform mouse NIH3T3 cells by itself, and its expression is induced by growth stimuli [41]. It is suggested to be a novel mitogen-dependent oncogene product involved in a Ras-related signal transduction pathway [41]. Moreover, DJ-1 translocates from cytoplasm to nuclei in the S phase of the cell cycle, indicating its involvement in cell proliferation. DJ-1 has also been found to be a regulatory subunit of a 400-kDa RNA-binding pro-

PORCINE OOCYTE PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION

tein complex [42]. Most importantly, it has been demonstrated that DJ-1 participates in fertilization [43]. It is the first report of this protein in the oocyte, and it is interesting because it is a protein implicated in fertilization and transformation. DJ-I lowers its pI upon exposure to hydroperoxide and might be a sensitive indicator of oxidative stress [44]. We have sequenced the two isoforms of the protein, and they correspond to the reported pIs of 5.8 and 6.2 for the protein, which may indicate that the oocyte was subjected to oxidative stress during in vitro maturation. We have also identified two annexins in the oocyte, annexin I and V. They are part of a family that binds phospholipids in a calcium-dependent manner. Annexin I was not present in GV-stage oocytes and was only synthesized during phase A of maturation. Its functions include promotion of membrane fusion, exocytosis, and cortical granule release in the oocyte [45]. Annexin I is also an oncogenic protein that is involved in cell differentiation [46] and anti-inflammatory response [47]. Its expression is increased in certain carcinomas [48], and it was identified as a metastasis-associated protein in cancer cell lines by proteomics techniques [49]; however, its function in cancer is yet unknown. It is translocated into the nucleus in cancer cells [50] or by stress [51]. The presence of annexin I in the somatic nuclei after incubations may reflect a stress response or possible unknown functions. Another oncogenic protein that has been identified is the elongation factor (EF)-1 delta. Similar to annexin I, this protein was not present in GV-stage oocytes and was only synthesized during phase A of maturation. It is a physiological substrate for cdc2 protein kinase [52] and, thus, a substrate for maturation-promoting factor, which is responsible for meiotic maturation. It serves as a phosphorylation memory signal for early development [53] and is possibly a sophisticated regulatory factor. Interestingly, the expression of EF-1 delta is upregulated in cadmium-induced carcinomas and its overexpression results in transformation and tumorigenesis [54, 55]. Annexin V, like annexin I, is a phospholipid-binding protein and has been localized to the cytoplasm in mouse oocytes [56]. Annexin V does not have the fusiogenic properties of annexin I and is involved more so in anticoagulation and ion channel activities [57]. It is a potent anticoagulant in the placenta and is essential for maintenance of placental integrity [58]. In addition, it is associated with oocyte-specific DNA methyltransferase 1 and is postulated to keep the DNMT 1o from localizing to the nucleus and thus allowing demethylation of the embryo during early cleavage stages [56]. One of the interesting proteins that we uncovered was the identification of a 20-kDa protein as the major vault protein, which is actually 100 kDa. There are three vault proteins that combine to form the 13-MDa vault complex, which is responsible for nucleo-cytoplasmic shuffling [59]. This complex is located in the cytoplasm; however, it associates with the nucleus to pick up and drop off cargo. The major vault protein is interesting, as it has also been identified as the lung-resistance protein, which is overexpressed in drug-resistant nonsmall cell lung carcinomas [60]. The 20-kDa oocyte protein was strongly matched to a splicing variant of the major vault protein [61]. The tandem mass spectrometry analysis revealed 45.7% coverage of the protein product of the gene promoter, with six matching peptides, which is abundant when we usually consider two or three peptides a good match. These results have not yet been confirmed by Western blotting; however, it is pos-

1287

sible that the oocyte expresses a 20-kDa version of this protein. Apolipoprotein A-1 was also found associated with somatic nuclei and was present in porcine oocytes. The oocyte contains apolipoprotein A1, as this is the high-density lipoprotein important in egg yolk, and in the chicken especially, apolipoprotein is accumulated in large quantities. This explains the presence of this protein in the oocyte; however, we are uncertain as to why it would be radioactively labeled as a synthesized protein, as the gene is specifically expressed only in the liver and intestine in mammals [62]. Interestingly, the apolipoprotein gene is unmethylated in the mature oocyte, showing the same methylation pattern as liver tissue [63], suggesting the possibility of its expression in the oocyte. It is more probable, however, that it is synthesized by cumulus granulosa cells and then transported into the oocyte, as with the chicken [64], explaining the radioactive labeling only during phase A of maturation when gap junctions between the oocyte and cumulus cells are still functional. Apolipoprotein A-1 has also been immunolocalized in the nuclei and shown to be associated with the nuclear matrix and chromatin [65]. A few of the identified proteins are stress proteins, all members of the heat shock family. These are GRP 78 or BiP protein, GRP 75/HSP 74, HSP 60, HSP 72/HSC 70. Heat shock family proteins increase their expression in response to heat stress; however, GRP 78 also responds to endoplasmic reticulum stress such as hypoglycemia [66]. These proteins aid in the correct folding of proteins, and especially after heat shock or cellular stress, they function to refold or degrade damaged proteins. HSC 70 is a cytosolic and nuclear protein, while GRP 78 is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum [67]. GRP 78 has been also reported on the surface of mouse eggs [37]. GRP 78 associates with nascent polypeptides and proteins, and its interaction appears to be related to the proteins’ stability. Studies done in the Xenopus oocyte suggest that unassembled proteins remain associated with GRP78 or BiP, and it may function to stabilize these proteins during maturational arrest [68]. Interestingly, GRP 78, HSC 70, and GRP 75 are all upregulated in certain carcinomas and may be implicated in the pathogenesis of cancer [69]. Although the presence only of GRP 78 was confirmed by immunoblotting in this study, the heat shock proteins show the same pattern on a 2-D proteomic map as another study [70]. Other proteins found associated with the somatic nuclei are involved with housekeeping functions in the cell. GRP 58 is not a heat shock protein, but is also called ER 60 or thioredoxin and participates in redox reactions. ERP 28 is mainly involved with the processing of secretory proteins found associated with somatic nuclei [71]. Also, the transcription factor Lisch 7 was identified, whose expression has been shown to be upregulated by p53 in response to stress in lung cancer cells [72]. Last, cdc-42 was identified, and this kinase functions in Xenopus oocytes to polymerize actin filaments during cortical granule exocytosis [73]. In conclusion, this is one of the first studies to identify oocyte proteins that associate with somatic cell nuclei in a cell-free system using proteomics techniques. It is also a first step in building an oocyte proteomic database, as oocyte proteins are identified in association with their appearance on a 2-D proteomic map. Furthermore, the use of proteomics provides a novel way to identify oocyte proteins potentially functionally involved in nuclear reprogramming. Further studies investigating the function of these proteins in nuclear reprogramming will help in understanding the

1288

NOVAK ET AL.

mechanisms of this phenomenon, aiding in improving nuclear transfer techniques and in vitro-fertilization procedures.

20.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Karine Coenen for assistance with 2D gel electrophoresis and Marc Moreau for collection of porcine ovaries and technical help.

21.

REFERENCES 1. Bordignon V, Clarke HJ, Smith LC. Factors controlling the loss of immunoreactive somatic histone H1 from blastomere nuclei in oocyte cytoplasm: a potential marker of nuclear reprogramming. Dev Biol 2001; 233:192–203. 2. Tanaka M, Hennebold JD, Macfarlane J, Adashi EY. A mammalian oocyte-specific linker histone gene H1oo: homology with the genes for the oocyte-specific cleavage stage histone (cs-H1) of sea urchin and the B4/H1M histone of the frog. Development 2001; 128:655– 664. 3. Kikyo N, Wade PA, Guschin D, Ge H, Wolffe AP. Active remodeling of somatic nuclei in egg cytoplasm by the nucleosomal ATPase ISWI. Science 2000; 289:2360–2362. 4. Zhao K, Wang W, Rando OJ, Xue Y, Swiderek K, Kuo A, Crabtree GR. Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNFlike BAF complex to chromatin after T lymphocyte receptor signaling. Cell 1998; 95:625–636. 5. Hakelien AM, Landsverk HB, Robl JM, Skalhegg BS, Collas P. Reprogramming fibroblasts to express T-cell functions using cell extracts. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20:460–466. 6. Merriam RW. Movement of cytoplasmic proteins into nuclei induced to enlarge and initiate DNA or RNA synthesis. J Cell Sci 1969; 5: 333–349. 7. Bachvarova R, De Leon V, Johnson A, Kaplan G, Paynton BV. Changes in total RNA, polyadenylated RNA, and actin mRNA during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1985; 108:325–331. 8. Ding J, Moor RM, Foxcroft GR. Effects of protein synthesis on maturation, sperm penetration, and pronuclear development in porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 33:59–66. 9. Walker SC, Shin T, Zaunbrecher GM, Romano JE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Piedrahita JA. A highly efficient method for porcine cloning by nuclear transfer using in vitro-matured oocytes. Clon Stem Cell 2002; 4:105–112. 10. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells [see comments]. Nature 2000; 407:86–90. 11. Boquest AC, Grupen CG, Harrison SJ, McIlfatrick SM, Ashman RJ, d’Apice AJ, Nottle MB. Production of cloned pigs from cultured fetal fibroblast cells. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:1283–1287. 12. Gandolfi F, Milanesi E, Pocar P, Luciano AM, Brevini TA, Acocella F, Lauria A, Armstrong DT. Comparative analysis of calf and cow oocytes during in vitro maturation. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 49:168– 175. 13. Coenen K, Massicotte L, Sirard MA. Study of newly synthesized proteins during bovine oocyte maturation in vitro using image analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Mol Reprod Dev 2004; 67: 313–322. 14. Wu B, Ignotz GG, Currie WB, Yang X. Temporal distinctions in the synthesis and accumulation of proteins by oocytes and cumulus cells during maturation in vitro of bovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 45:560–565. 15. Abeydeera LR, Wang WH, Prather RS, Day BN. Maturation in vitro of pig oocytes in protein-free culture media: fertilization and subsequent embryo development in vitro. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1316– 1320. 16. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48:61–73. 17. Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR III. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994; 5:976–989. 18. Fulka J Jr, First NL, Moor RM. Nuclear transplantation in mammals: remodeling of transplanted nuclei under the influence of maturation promoting factor. Bioessays 1991; 18:835–840. 19. Zakhartchenko V, Reichenbach HD, Riedl J, Palma GA, Wolf E, Brem

22. 23. 24.

25. 26. 27. 28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39.

40. 41.

G. Nuclear transfer in cattle using in vivo-derived vs. in vitro-produced donor embryos: effect of developmental stage. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 44:493–498. Baguisi A, Behboodi E, Melican DT, Pollock JS, Destrempes MM, Cammuso C, Williams JL, Nims SD, Porter CA, Midura P, Palacios MJ, Ayres SL, Denniston RS, Hayes ML, Ziomek CA, Meade HM, Godke RA, Gavin WG, Overstrom EW, Echelard Y. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:456– 461. Piotrowska K, Modlinski JA, Korwin-Kossakowski M, Karasiewicz J. Effects of preactivation of ooplasts or synchronization of blastomere nuclei in G1 on preimplantation development of rabbit serial nuclear transfer embryos. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:677–682. Lu ZH, Sittman DB, Brown DT, Munshi R, Leno GH. Histone H1 modulates DNA replication through multiple pathways in Xenopus egg extract. J Cell Sci 1997; 110:2745–2758. Gillespie PJ, Blow JJ. Nucleoplasmin-mediated chromatin remodeling is required for Xenopus sperm nuclei to become licensed for DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:472–480. Sun W, Hola M, Pedley K, Tada S, Blow JJ, Todorov IT, Kearsey SE, Brooks RF. The replication capacity of intact mammalian nuclei in Xenopus egg extracts declines with quiescence, but the residual DNA synthesis is independent of Xenopus MCM proteins. J Cell Sci 2000; 113:683–695. Adam SA, Sterne-Marr R, Gerace L. In vitro nuclear protein import using permeabilized mammalian cells. Methods Cell Biol 1991; 35: 469–482. Lu ZH, Xu H, Leno GH. DNA replication in quiescent cell nuclei: regulation by the nuclear envelope and chromatin structure. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:4091–4106. Rhind SM, Taylor JE, De Sousa PA, King TJ, McGarry M, Wilmut I. Human cloning: can it be made safe? Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4:855– 864. Lynch DK, Winata SC, Lyons RJ, Hughes WE, Lehrbach GM, Wasinger V, Corthals G, Cordwell S, Daly RJ. A cortactin-CD2-associated protein (CD2AP) complex provides a novel link between epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis and the actin cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:21805–21813. Imam-Sghiouar N, Laude-Lemaire I, Labas V, Pflieger D, Le Caer JP, Caron M, Nabias DK, Joubert-Caron R. Subproteomics analysis of phosphorylated proteins: application to the study of B-lymphoblasts from a patient with Scott syndrome. Proteomics 2002; 2:828–838. Sirotkin AV, Dukesova J, Pivko J, Makarevich AV, Kubek A. Effect of growth factors on proliferation, apoptosis and protein kinase A expression in cultured porcine cumulus oophorus cells. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002; 42:35–43. Sirotkin AV, Dukesova J, Makarevich AV, Kubek A, Bulla J. Evidence that growth factors IGF-I, IGF-II and EGF can stimulate nuclear maturation of porcine oocytes via intracellular protein kinase A. Reprod Nutr Dev 2000; 40:559–569. Morris RC, Morris GZ, Zhang W, Gellerman M, Beebe SJ. Differential transcriptional regulation by the alpha- and gamma-catalytic subunit isoforms of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Arch Biochem Biophys 2002; 403:219–228. Yuan LW, Gambee JE. Histone acetylation by p300 is involved in CREB-mediated transcription on chromatin. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001; 1541:161–169. Rando OJ, Zhao K, Crabtree GR. Searching for a function for nuclear actin. Trends Cell Biol 2000; 10:92–97. Gard DL, Kirschner MW. Microtubule assembly in cytoplasmic extracts of Xenopus oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:2191–2201. Lehman CW, Carroll D. Isolation of large quantities of functional, cytoplasm-free Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei. Anal Biochem 1993; 211:311–319. Shin MR, Park SW, Shim H, Kim NH. Nuclear and microtubule reorganization in nuclear-transferred bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 62:74–82. Greene ND, Leung KY, Wait R, Begum S, Dunn MJ, Copp AJ. Differential protein expression at the stage of neural tube closure in the mouse embryo. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:41645–41651. Calvert ME, Digilio LC, Herr JC, Coonrod SA. Oolemmal proteomics—identification of highly abundant heat shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the mature mouse egg and their localization on the plasma membrane. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003; 1:27. Coonrod SA, Wright PW, Herr JC. Oolemmal proteomics. J Reprod Immunol 2002; 53:55–65. Nagakubo D, Taira T, Kitaura H, Ikeda M, Tamai K, Iguchi-Ariga

PORCINE OOCYTE PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION

42. 43. 44.

45. 46.

47. 48. 49.

50.

51. 52.

53.

54. 55. 56.

SM, Ariga H. DJ-1, a novel oncogene which transforms mouse NIH3T3 cells in cooperation with ras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 231:509–513. Hod Y, Pentyala SN, Whyard TC, El-Maghrabi MR. Identification and characterization of a novel protein that regulates RNA-protein interaction. J Cell Biochem 1999; 72:435–444. Okada M, Matsumoto K, Niki T, Taira T, Iguchi-Ariga SM, Ariga H. DJ-1, a target protein for an endocrine disrupter, participates in the fertilization in mice. Biol Pharm Bull 2002; 25:853–856. Mitsumoto A, Nakagawa Y, Takeuchi A, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Takanezawa Y. Oxidized forms of peroxiredoxins and DJ-1 on two-dimensional gels increased in response to sublethal levels of paraquat. Free Radic Res 2001; 35:301–310. Spenneberg R, Osterloh D, Gerke V. Phospholipid vesicle binding and aggregation by four novel fish annexins are differently regulated by Ca21. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998; 1448:311–319. Violette SM, King I, Browning JL, Pepinsky RB, Wallner BP, Sartorelli AC. Role of lipocortin I in the glucocorticoid induction of the terminal differentiation of a human squamous carcinoma. J Cell Physiol 1990; 142:70–77. Cirino G, Flower RJ, Browning JL, Sinclair LK, Pepinsky RB. Recombinant human lipocortin 1 inhibits thromboxane release from guinea-pig isolated perfused lung. Nature 1987; 328:270–272. Pencil SD, Toth M. Elevated levels of annexin I protein in vitro and in vivo in rat and human mammary adenocarcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis 1998; 16:113–121. Wu W, Tang X, Hu W, Lotan R, Hong WK, Mao L. Identification and validation of metastasis-associated proteins in head and neck cancer cell lines by two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Clin Exp Metastasis 2002; 19:319–326. Liu Y, Wang HX, Lu N, Mao YS, Liu F, Wang Y, Zhang HR, Wang K, Wu M, Zhao XH. Translocation of annexin I from cellular membrane to the nuclear membrane in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9:645–649. Rhee HJ, Kim GY, Huh JW, Kim SW, Na DS. Annexin I is a stress protein induced by heat, oxidative stress and a sulfhydryl-reactive agent. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267:3220–3225. Mulner-Lorillon O, Minella O, Cormier P, Capony JP, Cavadore JC, Morales J, Poulhe R, Belle R. Elongation factor EF-1 delta, a new target for maturation-promoting factor in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:20201–20207. Minella O, Cormier P, Morales J, Poulhe R, Belle R, Mulner-Lorillon O. Cdc2 kinase sets a memory phosphorylation signal on elongation factor EF-1 delta during meiotic cell division, which perdures in early development. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1994; 40:521–525. Joseph P, Lei YX, Whong WZ, Ong TM. Oncogenic potential of mouse translation elongation factor-1 delta, a novel cadmium-responsive proto-oncogene. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:6131–6136. Lei YX, Chen JK, Wu ZL. Blocking the translation elongation factor1 delta with its antisense mRNA results in a significant reversal of its oncogenic potential. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 2002; 22:377–383. Doherty AS, Bartolomei MS, Schultz RM. Regulation of stage-specific nuclear translocation of Dnmt1o during preimplantation mouse development. Dev Biol 2002; 242:255–266.

1289

57. Gerke V, Moss SE. Annexins and membrane dynamics. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997; 1357:129–154. 58. Wang X, Campos B, Kaetzel MA, Dedman JR. Annexin V is critical in the maintenance of murine placental integrity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:1008–1016. 59. Mossink MH, van Zon A, Scheper RJ, Sonneveld P, Wiemer EA. Vaults: a ribonucleoprotein particle involved in drug resistance? Oncogene 2003; 22:7458–7467. 60. Scheffer GL, Wijngaard PL, Flens MJ, Izquierdo MA, Slovak ML, Pinedo HM, Meijer CJ, Clevers HC, Scheper RJ. The drug resistancerelated protein LRP is the human major vault protein. Nat Med 1995; 1:578–582. 61. Lange C, Walther W, Schwabe H, Stein U. Cloning and initial analysis of the human multidrug resistance-related MVP/LRP gene promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 278:125–133. 62. Williams SC, Grant SG, Reue K, Carrasquillo B, Lusis AJ, Kinniburgh AJ. Cis-acting determinants of basal and lipid-regulated apolipoprotein A-IV expression in mice. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:19009– 19016. 63. Shemer R, Walsh A, Eisenberg S, Breslow JL, Razin A. Tissue-specific methylation patterns and expression of the human apolipoprotein AI gene. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:1010–1015. 64. Hermann M, Lindstedt KA, Foisner R, Morwald S, Mahon MG, Wandl R, Schneider WJ, Nimpf J. Apolipoprotein A-I production by chicken granulosa cells. FASEB J 1998; 12:897–903. 65. Panin LE, Polyakov LM, Kolosova NG, Russkikh GS, Poteryaeva ON. Distribution of tocopherol and apolipoprotein A-I immunoreactivity in rat liver chromatin. Membr Cell Biol 1998; 11:631–640. 66. Lee AS. The glucose-regulated proteins: stress induction and clinical applications. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26:504–510. 67. Jolly C, Morimoto RI. Role of the heat shock response and molecular chaperones in oncogenesis and cell death. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:1564–1572. 68. Beggah AT, Geering K. Alpha and beta subunits of Na,K-ATPase interact with BiP and calnexin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997; 834:537– 539. 69. Takashima M, Kuramitsu Y, Yokoyama Y, Iizuka N, Toda T, Sakaida I, Okita K, Oka M, Nakamura K. Proteomic profiling of heat shock protein 70 family members as biomarkers for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Proteomics 2003; 3:2487–2493. 70. Lichtenfels R, Kellner R, Bukur J, Beck J, Brenner W, Ackermann A, Seliger B. Heat shock protein expression and anti-heat shock protein reactivity in renal cell carcinoma. Proteomics 2002; 2:561–570. 71. Ferrari DM, Nguyen Van P, Kratzin HD, Soling HD. ERp28, a human endoplasmic-reticulum-lumenal protein, is a member of the protein disulfide isomerase family but lacks a CXXC thioredoxin-box motif. Eur J Biochem 1998; 255:570–579. 72. Kannan K, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Jakob-Hirsch J, Kela I, Kaminski N, Getz G, Domany E, Givol D. DNA microarrays identification of primary and secondary target genes regulated by p53. Oncogene 2001; 20:2225–2234. 73. Sokac AM, Co C, Taunton J, Bement W. Cdc42-dependent actin polymerization during compensatory endocytosis in Xenopus eggs. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:727–732.