IGF, IGF Receptor and Overgrowth Syndromes Itay Bentov, MD, Haim Werner, PhD Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel Corresponding Author: Haim Werner, Ph.D., Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978 ISRAEL, Phone: 972-3-6408542, Fax: 972-3-6406087, Email:
[email protected]
Abstract
T
he insulin-like growth factors are a family of growth
factors, binding proteins and receptors that are involved in
normal growth as well as in a number of pathological states. Overgrowth syndromes are a group of disorders characterized by a phenotype of excessive somatic and visceral growth. In addition, patients suffering from overgrowth syndromes are predisposed to develop cancer. Several specific defects linked to the insulin-like growth factor system were elucidated for a group of these disorders, including Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The aim of this review is to examine recent data linking the phenotype of overgrowth syndromes, visceral growth and increased risk of neoplasia, with the molecular machinery of the IGF system. Ref: Ped. Endocrinol. Rev. 2004;4:????? Key words: IGF-1, IGF-2, IGF-1 receptor, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, BannayanRuvalcaba-Riley syndrome, Wilms' tumor, overgrowth.
Introduction Assisted reproduction technologies have gained worldwide acceptance in the last twenty-five years. The recent recognition that the incidence of the Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) is significantly increased in babies conceived with the aid of in-vitro fertilization spurred a renewed interest in the molecular and pathological processes leading to the overgrowth syndromes (1-3). The Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) family of ligands, receptors and binding proteins plays a
pivotal role in growth processes as well as in the development of neoplasia. In view of the fact that both unrestrained growth and augmented incidence of cancer are typical hallmarks of most overgrowth syndromes, significant efforts have been invested in recent years in examining the potential involvement of the IGF axis in the etiology of overgrowth. The aim of this review is to evaluate evidence linking the overgrowth phenotype with the molecular machinery of the IGF system.
The IGF System The IGFs are a family of mitogenic growth factors, binding proteins and receptors that are involved in normal growth and differentiation of most organs and are also implicated in a wide array of pathological states. The existence of the IGFs was postulated in the late 1950’s, following the seminal observation by Salmon and Daughaday that growth hormone stimulated the incorporation of sulfate into cartilage in an indirect fashion, which involved activation of a specific serum factor. The factor that was originally termed “sulfation factor” and then “somatomedin” is now accepted as insulin-like growth factor-1 (4).
Ligands The IGF system consists of two ligands, IGF-1 and IGF-2. At the cellular level IGF-1 is a progression factor that is required by the cell to traverse the cell cycle (5). Circulating IGF-1 levels are mostly dependent on liver production, which is tightly controlled by growth hormone. In addition to its classical endocrine role, many extrahepatic tissues produce IGF-1, which exhibits paracrine and autocrine modes of action in these tissues. In rodents, very low levels of IGF-1 and high IGF-2 levels are observed during the prenatal period, while
29 Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
IGFs and overgrowth syndromes
postnatal stages are characterized by an increase in circulating IGF-1 and disappearance of IGF-2. These observations might have led to an erroneous generalized interpretation of the roles of IGF-2 and IGF-1 as fetal and pubertal growth factors, respectively. In humans, however, this expression pattern does not exist and both ligands are produced from the prenatal to the postnatal periods. In fact, in normal healthy adult subjects circulating IGF-2 levels are higher than IGF-1.
Receptors Both ligands activate a common receptor, the IGF-1 receptor (IGF1R), which signals mitogenic, antiapoptotic and transforming activities. The IGF1R is a cell-surface tyrosine kinase receptor coupled to several intracellular second messenger pathways, including the ras-raf-MAPK and PI3'K signaling cascades (6). IGF1R is vital for cell survival, as illustrated by the lethal phenotype of mice in which the IGF1R gene was disrupted by homologous recombination (7) (see below). During normal ontogenesis, the IGF1R is expressed at every developmental period, including the oocyte stage. Late embryonic and adult stages, in which the percentage of rapidly proliferating cells declines, are associated with an overall reduction in the levels of IGF1R mRNA. In the neoplastic process a "primitive" pattern of IGF1R expression is established again. Transformed cells display augmented numbers of IGF1R on their cell surface as well as increased levels of IGF1R mRNA. Examination of various tumors (including breast, ovarian, prostate, colon, hematopoietic, rhabdomyosarcoma and renal), show an abundant expression of IGF1R (8), suggesting that up regulation of the IGF1R gene constitutes a common paradigm in different types of cancer. Molecular cloning of the IGF-2 receptor revealed that a single cell-surface receptor is able to bind both Mannose 6-Phosphate (M6P)-containing moieties and IGF-2 molecules (9). The IGF-2/M6P receptor targets IGF-2 for lysosomal degradation (10) and thus reduces the bioavailability of circulating IGF-2. Diminished levels of IGF-2 lead to a depressed activation of the IGF1R. Accordingly, the IGF-2/M6P receptor has been postulated to function as a tumor suppressor. A mutated or deleted IGF-2/M6P receptor was described in several neoplasms (11). Interestingly, IGF-2 can also signal via a particular isoform of the insulin receptor which is generated by alternative splicing of the insulin receptor gene (12). Finally, IGF-2 and IGF-2/M6P receptor are epigenetically silenced in a reciprocal manner. Thus, in humans, IGF-2 is translated only from the paternal allele while the IGF-2/M6P receptor is translated only from the maternal allele (13).
IGF Binding Proteins - IGFBPs The IGF system also includes at least six high affinity IGF Binding Proteins (IGFBP1-6). In general, the IGFBPs inhibit IGFs' metabolic and proliferative actions, although some IGFBPs may
display IGF-potentiating effects as well. In the serum, the majority of circulating IGFs are found in a ternary complex with IGFBP3 and an acid-labile subunit. This complex modulates IGF action by protecting the growth factors from proteolysis and prolonging their half lives in the circulation (14). In addition, some IGFBPs exert their biological effects in an IGF-independent manner. IGFBP3 is recognized as an inhibitor of proliferation, driving the cell to apoptosis (15). An inverse relation between serum IGFBP3 levels and IGF action has been observed. Several potential mechanisms of action were postulated to explain IGFBP-3 inhibition of IGF action. These include sequestration of IGF-1 from the receptor (16) and binding competition with the receptor (17) as well as IGF-independent mechanisms of action (18). Recently, the IGFBP family has been extended to include three new IGFBP-related proteins (IGFBP-rPs). The IGFBP-rPs are cysteine rich proteins characterized by their similarity to the IGFBP’s. IGFBP-rPs share a conserved aminoterminal domain and affinity to both IGF-1 and insulin. IGFBP-rPs have been suggested to function as tumor suppressors on the basis of experiments showing a growth inhibitory role in a prostate cellular model (19).
IGF and Size The essential role played by the IGF system in growth and development was demonstrated by the severe growth deficits observed in mice in which various components of the IGF system were disrupted by homologous recombination. The quantitative effect of IGF-1 and IGF-2 on body size has gained substantial support from several models.
Figure 1: Overgrowth syndromes and the IGF axis. IGF-1 and IGF-2 activate the IGF1R, which signals via the PI3K and MAPK pathways. The PI3K is negatively regulated by PTEN, which is mutated in the Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome. IGF-1 synthesis is controlled by growth hormone (GH). IGF-2 production depends on the imprinting status of the IGF-2 gene. In addition, circulating IGF-2 levels are controlled by IGF2R. Specific disruptions of the IGF axis in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS), Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome (BRR), and acromegaly are highlighted (see text for details).
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
30
????
Knock-Out Mice Experiments Crossing of heterozygous mice containing a disrupted IGF-1 allele (20) led to the production of three phenotypically distinct groups: wild-type homozygote mice (wt/wt), heterozygotes (wt/igf1-) and homozygotes for the disrupted allele (igf1-/igf1-). The body weight of heterozygote mice at the time of birth was about 10-20% less than wild-type animals, whereas igf1-/igf1- homozygotes weighed about 40% less than wild type. In addition, igf1-/igf1- homozygotes showed a very high perinatal mortality, delayed ossification, underdeveloped muscles and lungs and infertility. To evaluate the effect of IGF-2 on normal growth, IGF-2 gene-disrupted chimeras were crossed with normal littermates (21). When the paternal mice was a chimera, the heterozygote offspring were healthy "dwarves" that weighed about 60% of the normal littermates at birth. All other offspring (including the heterozygotes bred from the maternal chimeras) were normal (22). These observations highlight two important points: 1. The rodent IGF-2 gene is imprinted (silenced) in the maternal allele and, 2. IGF-1 is essential for correct embryonic development whereas IGF-2 action is less critical (23). Disruption of the IGF1R gene by homologous recombination resulted in small (more than 50% reduction in weight) animals that died in the immediate postnatal period from respiratory failure. These animals exhibited generalized developmental abnormalities, including hypoplasia, abnormal skin formation, delayed bone development and abnormal central nervous system morphology. A double mutant generated by knocking out the IGF-1 gene in addition to the IGF1R gene showed essentially the same phenotype as that of the IGF1R mutant (24). However a double IGF-2/IGF1R mutant revealed a profound growth impairment (birth weight about 30% of normal littermates) (25), suggesting that IGF-2 can signal via alternative signaling pathways. As mentioned above, an isoform of the insulin receptor was identified in fetal and cancer cells as a potential alternative pathway for IGF-2 signaling (26). Finally, in accordance with its role as a repressor of the IGF1R cascade, mice with a deletion of the IGF-2/M6P receptor gene are larger (135% body weight of controls), probably as a result of the elevated levels of circulating IGF-2.
Epidemiological Studies In addition to the phenotypes of IGF component-deleted animals, a number of epidemiological observations in certain human populations highlight the pivotal role of the IGF axis in normal growth. For example, circulating IGF-1 levels in African pygmies are markedly lower than in the general population (27). Moreover, an important contribution to our understanding of the role of IGF-1 in growth was derived from the observation that growth hormone and IGF-2 levels are normal in African pygmies, whereas IGF-1 levels in adolescent males and females
were significantly lower. As a result of this reduction, the growth spurt that usually accompanies adolescence is absent (28). Interestingly, screening of another short statured population, the Mountain Ok people of Papua New Guinea, revealed normal circulating IGF-1 levels (29). The importance of IGF-1 in normal growth is classically illustrated by the Laron Syndrome (LS). LS patients are characterized by defects in growth hormone receptor (30). Their resistance or insensitivity to growth hormone results in diminished IGF-1 production despite normal or even high growth hormone levels. LS patients’ height is four to ten standard deviations below median normal height. Acceleration of linear growth was demonstrated by continuous, long term treatment of affected patients with recombinant IGF-1 (31). Screening of IGF levels in non-human species with distinct phenotypic features revealed that in different breeds of dogs circulating IGF-1 levels are matched with breed size. As a general rule, smaller breeds have lower IGF-1 levels than larger breeds (32).
Overgrowth Syndromes Overgrowth Syndromes are a group of disorders associated with a phenotype of excessive somatic and visceral growth. Although widely recognized and extensively reviewed (33), several classifications were used to define and classify the overgrowth syndromes. A typical classification based on purely phenotypic features divides the overgrowth syndromes in generalized versus regional versus parameter-specific overgrowth. A more complex classification has also been suggested which groups overgrowth cases according to the following features (34): 1. Familial tall stature. 2. Pre- or postnatal onset overgrowth. 3. Intrinsic cellular hyperplasia versus humerally mediated hyperplasia. These classification schemes address the differences in growth pattern in a non-rigid, organizing manner rather than by a molecular causative parameter. The limiting step toward a causative classification is inadequate genetic information concerning these disorders. The molecular nature of several specific defects, however, was elucidated for a small subgroup of these disorders. These include mutation of the GPL3 gene in the Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (35), mutation of PTEN in the Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome (36) and imprinting of genes in the 11p15.5 locus in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, the classical overgrowth syndrome (37). We will try to demonstrate that all of these defects may impinge upon the IGF system (Figure 1). [A putative molecular mechanism for Sotos syndrome, another overgrowth syndrome , was suggested to be caused by haploinsufficiency of the NSD1 gene (38). As the function of this gene is still unclear, Sotos syndrome will
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
31
????
not be included in this discussion. Noteworthy, NSD1 has been suggested to be involved in development, as shown by the early fetal mortality in NSD1 knock-out mice(39)].
Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome The most extensively studied overgrowth syndrome is Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. BWS is an overgrowth malformation syndrome that occurs with an incidence of 1/13,700 live births. It is manifested at birth by macroglossia, hepatosplenomegaly, nephromegaly and abdominal wall defects. Laboratory investigation often reveals hypoglycemia, secondary to pancreatic beta cell hyperplasia. Children suffering from BWS are predisposed to childhood neoplasm. The risk of developing a neoplasm in the early years of life in BWS patients is estimated to be about 7.5-12.5% (compared to 1:10000 in the general population). The most common neoplasias associated with BWS are Wilms' tumor, hepatoblastoma and neuroblastoma (40). BWS is often considered to be a prototype for the study of aberrant genomic imprinting diseases. Genomic imprinting refers to the process of differential parent specific expression of particular genes, resulting in exclusive expression from either the maternal or the paternal allele (41). Only a small number of genes in the human genome are known to be imprinted. Interestingly, several of these genes (IGF-2, H19, p57kip2, KVLQT1) are located in the small arm of chromosome 11. Overexpression of the IGF-2 gene is most likely one of the leading causes of BWS. As mentioned above, the IGF-2 gene is an imprinted one (i.e., it is only expressed from the paternal allele). Overexpression of IGF-2 in BWS may be caused by a number of genetic events, including gene duplication, loss of heterozygosity and loss of imprinting of the IGF-2 gene. Biallelic expression was observed in about half of sporadic BWS cases (42). The transcription of the IGF-2 gene is under the control of four promoters (P1-P4). P1 is not normally imprinted while the other three promoters undergo silencing by DNA methylation (43). Imprinting alterations in all four IGF-2 gene promoters were reported in hepatocellular carcinoma (44) and Wilms tumor (45). Closely linked to the IGF-2 gene is the H19 gene that encodes a nontranslated mRNA, which is nevertheless biologically active as a tumor suppressor (46). The maternally expressed H19 and the paternally expressed IGF-2 genes are coordinately regulated. A targeted deletion of the H19 gene in mice results in biallelic IGF-2 expression (47). Loss of imprinting of IGF-2 is associated with an 80-fold down regulation of H19 expression, which was shown to be related to alterations in DNA methylation of the H19 promoter (48). Recently, synthetic zinc-finger transcription factors were shown to both positively and negatively regulate the expression of the IGF-2 and H19 genes (49). The ability to override epigenetically controlled states is an encouraging prospect in the treatment of both overgrowth syndromes and malignancy. Two other maternally expressed genes, p57kip2 (a member of the
cyclin-dependant kinase inhibitor family) (50) and KVLQT1 (part of a potassium channel) (51), are compactly located in the proximity of the IGF-2 and H19 loci, in the short arm of chromosome 11. Imprinting abnormalities in the p57kip2 and KVLQT1 genes were described in a minority of BWS patients. The significance of these imprinting defects in BWS etiology remains to be established. Finally, a number of recent reports showed that the incidence of BWS was increased in babies conceived with the help of assisted reproduction technologies. The results of these studies may suggest that manipulations that are inherent to the fertilization technologies and that occur at critical periods for the establishment and maintenance of specific epigenetic modifications, could lead to severe pathological defects (52).
Simpson-Golabi-Behmel Syndrome The first description of this syndrome by Simpson in 1975 reported two maternally related cousins with macrocephaly and a “coarse” face. Ten years later Behmel and, independently, Golabi described two families in which affected males had the same features and early infant death. In addition, X-linked inheritance was suggested. Several years later, in a description of another family showing similar features, the term Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS) was coined (53) SGBS, sometimes mistakenly diagnosed as BWS, shares many similarities with BWS. This similarity is manifested not only by the somatic and visceral gigantism (especially enlargement of the liver, kidneys and spleen) but also by an increased risk of developing malignancies. Unlike the various malignancies that have been described in association with BWS, only cases of Wilms' tumor, usually diagnosed before two years of age, have been reported in SGBS. Similar to BWS, the molecular pathology of SGBS seems to involve disruption of IGF-2 action (54). SGBS is an X-linked recessive trait with mild expression in heterozygous females. Deletions in an extracellular proteoglycan designated Glypican 3 (GPC3) have been implicated in SGBS (55). The GPC3 gene contains eight exons and it encodes a heparan sulphate proteoglycan which can function on the cell surface as a receptor (56). Noteworthy is the fact that GPC3 interacts with IGF-2 (57). Dysfunction of GPC3 may lead to release of IGF-2 from GPC3 control, hence enhancing IGF-2 action.
Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley Syndrome/Cowden Syndrome Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition that presents as a triad of macrocephaly, a speckled penis and subcutaneous and visceral lipomata and hemangiomata (58). The term Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome has replaced three distinct syndromes: Riley-Smith, Bannayan-Zonana and Ruvalcaba-Myhre-Smith (59). Cowden syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
32
????
multiple hamartomas and by an increased risk of breast, thyroid and endometrial malignancies (60). A germline mutation in the PTEN (Phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome Ten) gene was demonstrated in 80% of the patients suffering from Cowden syndrome (61) and 60% of the Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley Syndrome patients (62). A recent report showed that the majority of the “non germline mutation” cases displayed PTEN promoter mutations and deletions, leading to aberrant PTEN protein production (63). This has led to the suggestion that Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome and Cowden syndrome are in fact a single entity (64). PTEN is a tumor suppressor gene that was found to be frequently (second only to p53) altered in neoplasia (65). In breast cancer, decreased PTEN expression was associated with invasiveness and poor prognosis (66). PTEN regulates Akt (a cell survival kinase) phosphorylation in a negative fashion and thereby antagonizes the PI3K/Akt pathway, a major signaling pathway of the IGF system. It has been postulated that loss of PTEN action augments IGF action and creates a tumorigenic environment. New insight into an intrinsic negative feedback mechanism of the IGF system was recently suggested by the finding that IGF-2 induces PTEN expression (67). Combined, these results imply that IGF-2 may exert both mitogenic activities (with important consequences in mammary carcinogenesis) and inhibitory types of action (that may lead to a hypomorphic effect during mammary gland development).
Acromegaly Although not considered a "classical" overgrowth syndrome, acromegaly shares many of the properties discussed above (i.e., increased size, elevated risk of neoplasia and a strong connection to the IGF system). Acromegaly is a disorder that results from an excessive secretion of growth hormone from the pituitary gland, leading to elevated circulating IGF-1 levels. Acromegaly is characterized by bone overgrowth presenting as acral enlargement and visceromegaly. Studies linking acromegaly with an elevated risk of colon polyps and cancer led to the establishment of guidelines for routine colonoscopic screening of acromegalic patients (68). Of importance, the risk of colonic neoplasia is substantially higher in acromegalic patients with the highest serum levels of IGF-1 as compared to those with lower levels (69).
Gene Dosage of the IGF1R The important role of the IGF1R in normal and pathological human growth has been directly demonstrated by the phenotypes of patients with chromosomal abnormalities that disrupt the IGF1R locus. The IGF1R gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 15 (15q26). Ring chromosome is a rare chromosomal abnormality resulting from the breakage and reunion of both chromosome arms. The phenotype of a ring
chromosome depends upon the genetic sequences deleted or duplicated. Patients suffering from ring chromosome 15 were evaluated in order to establish a potential correlation between growth retardation and the presence or absence of the IGF1R gene. Hemizygotes for the IGF1R locus showed severe growth failure, while a patient with a ring chromosome possessing two copies of the gene had borderline stature (70). Increased size and overgrowth were reported in two independent families with a balanced translocation involving 15q26.1 ∂ qter. Affected members exhibited three copies of the IGF1R gene, macrosomia at birth and macrocephaly (71). The dosage effect of IGF1R copy number was functionally assessed in studies of cellular proliferation. Results obtained showed that skin fibroblasts from a patient with a single copy of the IGF1R gene (due to a deletion on 15q26.2, presenting with growth retardation) showed slower cellular growth than controls. On the other hand, a patient with three IGF1R copies (due to a partial duplication of the long arm of chromosome 15, presenting with height and weight above the 97th percentile) showed accelerated cellular growth (72). An elegant example of the dosage effect of IGF1R came from a single family where the father had a balanced chromosomal translocation t(13;15)(q34;q26.1). One of the offspring, suffering from trisomy 15q26.1 and thus three copies of the IGF1R gene, exhibited postnatal overgrowth. A fetus with only one copy showed severe intrauterine growth retardation. Interestingly, another girl in the family with the same trisomy did not show accelerated growth, probably due to the fact that she suffered from cardiac abnormalities (endocardial cushion defect) that tend to cause growth failure (73). Chromosomal abnormalities, however, may include loss or gain of additional genes located in close proximity to the IGF1R locus. The recent report of two distinct IGF1R mutations provides convincing evidence that defects in the IGF1R lead to intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. Specifically, two groups of children were examined. The first group consisted of 42 patients with unexplained intrauterine growth retardation and subsequent short stature and the second group included 50 children with short stature who had high circulating IGF-1 levels (74) . In the first cohort a girl was identified who was a compound heterozygote for point mutation in exon 2 of the IGF1R gene that altered the amino acid sequence to Arg108Gln in one allele and Lys115Asn in the other. Fibroblasts cultured from the patient had decreased IGF1R binding and phosphorylation. In the second cohort a boy was identified with a nonsense mutation, Arg59STOP, which reduced IGF1R number. Noteworthy is that although both cases showed prenatal and postnatal growth retardation, they were phenotypically different. Finally, homozygous partial deletion of the IGF-1 gene has been reported in a 15-year-old boy with severe prenatal and postnatal growth deficiency, sensorineural deafness and mental retardation (75).
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
33
????
IGF and Malignancy A high cellular turnover in epithelial tissue is generally accepted as a contributing factor to the propagation of a neoplastic process. The proliferative effect of IGF-1 led to several observational studies that were intended to elucidate the possible connection between circulating IGF-1 levels and an increased risk of neoplasia. Initially, small retrospective studies failed to show a link between IGF-1 and breast (76) or prostate (77) cancer. Recent large epidemiological studies have suggested that high circulating IGF-1 concentrations are associated with an increased risk for breast, prostate, lung and colorectal cancer. Specifically, in a prospective nested control study (the Nurse's Health Study) the Relative Risk (RR) of breast cancer in premenopausal women was 4.6 in the upper tertile of IGF-1 values, in comparison to women in the lower tertile (78). The RR increased to 7.3 when the concentrations of IGFBP3 were included in the analysis. Likewise, the RR of prostate cancer in men (evaluated in the Physician's Health Study) in the upper quartile of IGF-1 values was 2.4 (4.3 when normalized for IGFBP3) (79). Noteworthy is that IGF-1 levels were measured an average of seven years before the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Recently a meta-analysis of fourteen studies confirmed the association between IGF-1 levels and prostate cancer (80). In addition to hormone-dependant prostate and breast carcinomas, the importance of IGF-1 as a risk factor was evaluated in various non hormone-dependant types of cancers. Analysis of colon cancer risk in the Nurse's Health Study (81) and the Physician's Health Study (82) showed an increased cancer risk in individuals with the highest IGF-1 values (although a lower RR was observed). Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain the possible role of the IGF system in the initiation and/or progression of neoplasia (83). Although IGF-1 was shown to increase chromosomal fragility under experimental conditions (84), it is usually considered to be nongenotoxic. The proliferative actions of IGF-1, however, have been well characterized. A biologically based, computerized description of carcinogenesis suggested that an increase in cell proliferation could account for the carcinogenicity of nongenotoxic compounds (85). Once a malignant transformation has occurred, cell survival in transformed cells depends on IGF-1 action (86). The disruption of internal checks and control mechanisms associated with the neoplastic phenotype is further emphasized by the finding that IGF-1 action can override the cellular signals of apoptosis (87). An encouraging observation for a possible role of the IGF system not only in screening for cancer but as an interventional target, is that blockade of the IGF-1 receptor by αIR3, a monoclonal antibody directed against the human IGF1R, inhibited proliferation of several carcinoma cell lines including colon, breast and others (88). Furthermore when nude mice
were implanted with colon cancer cells, expression of a dominant-negative truncated IGF1R resulted in reduced tumor progression (89). The search for anticancer treatments prompted the study of the intracellular signaling cascades that regulate IGF system expression as possible therapeutic targets. For example, tumor suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that protects mammalian cells against cancer. Accordingly, mutations in p53 are a common finding in many human cancers. Consistent with its role as a tumor suppressor, wild-type p53 was shown to inhibit, while mutated p53 up-regulated, IGF1R expression (90). Understanding the relationships between the IGF system and other cell survival regulators, like Mdm-2, PTEN and NF-kB, as well as the interactions with cellular migration effectors, like E-cadherin and β-catenin, is the goal of extensive investigation (91).
IGF and Wilms' Tumor The association of Beckwith-Wiedemann and SimpsonGolabi-Behmel syndromes with Wilms' tumor is well established and warrants a careful investigation into the pathological process leading to the sometimes fatal neoplastic process in early childhood. In 1899, Max Wilms described seven children suffering from nephroblastoma. Important contributions by other pathologists led to the definition of this form of childhood cancer as nephroblastoma or Wilms' tumor (92). Wilms' tumor accounts for almost all of the renal neoplasms in infancy. In children under the age of fifteen years it occurs with an annual frequency of 7.8 per million, affecting both sexes equally. Wilms' tumor often accompanies congenital anomalies as genitourinary malformations, hemihypertrophy (that is sometimes only noted during the growth spurt of puberty) and aniridia. Wilms' tumor commonly presents as a large, often asymptomatic, abdominal mass, typically diagnosed at the age of three years. Treatment options include surgical removal followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Prognosis is better with small, early-diagnosed tumors but is mainly dependant on the histological findings and clinical staging (93). WT1 is a cell-type specific zinc-finger transcription factor whose deletion or mutation has been implicated in the etiology of Wilms' tumor (94). Consistent with the putative tumor suppressor role of WT1, it was shown that WT1 inhibits the expression of the IGF1R gene via a mechanism that involves binding of its zinc-finger domain to multiple cis-elements in the IGF1R promoter (95,96). Suppression of IGF1R promoter activity by WT1 constitutes a potential mechanism by which terminally-differentiated cells remain at a postmitotic stage. Loss-of-function mutation of WT1 can de-repress the IGF1R promoter, resulting in increased production of cell-surface receptors and augmented mitogenic activation by locally produced and/or circulating IGFs. Similarly, IGF-2 is
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
34
????
overexpressed in Wilms' tumor and may support cancer progression. Like with the IGF1R gene, WT1 binds multiple sites in the IGF-2 promoter and functions as a repressor of IGF-2 transcription. Mutation of WT1 may lead to relaxation of IGF-2 gene repression, with a resulting increase in IGF-2 levels (97). A feedback mechanism was suggested by the finding that WT1 expression was shown to be down-regulated following activation of the IGF1R by IGF-1. Using specific inhibitors it has been demonstrated that IGF-1 action is mediated through the mitogenic ras-raf-MAPK pathway (98).
Conclusions The IGF system has a crucial role in normal development. Alterations in the IGF signaling axis are associated with a number of pathological states. In this review, we have presented evidence that suggests that the etiology of several overgrowth syndromes is closely linked to the IGF system. A better knowledge and understanding of the complex machinery of the IGF system will undoubtedly improve our ability to develop treatment modalities for those conditions in which the IGF system is involved.
Acknowledgments Work in the laboratory of H.W. is supported in part by a grant from the Israel Cancer Association.
References 1.
Debaun MR, Niemitz EL, Feinberg AP. Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:156-160 2. Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC, Luharia A, Cooper W, Cole TR, Macdonald F, Sampson JR, Barratt CL, Reik W, Hawkins MM. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology (ART). J Med Genet 2003;40:62-64 3. Gicquel C, Gaston V, Mandelbaum J, Siffroi JP, Flahault A, Le Bouc Y. In vitro fertilization may increase the risk of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome related to the abnormal imprinting of the KCNQ1OT gene. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:1338-1341 4. Rosenfeld RG. Insulin-like growth factors and the basis of growth. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2184-2186 5. Moschos SJ, Mantzoros CS. The role of the IGF system in cancer: from basic to clinical studies and clinical applications. Oncology 2002;63:317-332 6. LeRoith D, Werner H, Beitner-Johnson D, Roberts CT Jr. Molecular and cellular aspects of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Endocrine Rev 1995;16:143-163 7. Baker J, Liu JP, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A. Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell 1993;75:73-82 8. Werner H, LeRoith D. The role of the insulin-like growth factor system in human cancer. Adv Cancer Res 1996;68:183-223 9. Morgan DO, Edman JC, Standring DN, Fried VA, Smith MC, Roth RA, Rutter WJ. Insulin-like growth factor II receptor as a multifunctional binding protein. Nature 1987;329:301-307 10. Kornfeld S. Structure and function of the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin like growth factor II receptors. Annu Rev Biochem 1992;61:307-330
11. Leboulleux S, Gaston V, Boulle N, Le Bouc Y, Gicquel C. Loss of heterozygosity at the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor locus: a frequent but late event in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Eur J Endocrinol 2001;144:163-168 12. Morrione A, Valentinis B, Xu SQ, Yumet G, Louvi A, Efstratiadis A, Baserga R. Insulin-like growth factor II stimulates cell proliferation through the insulin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:3777-3782 13. Barlow DP, Stoger R, Herrmann BG, Saito K, Schweifer N. The mouse insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus. Nature 1991;349:84-87 14. Baxter RC. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins: interactions with IGFs and intrinsic bioactivities. Am J Physiol 2000;278:967-976 15. Collard TJ, Guy M, Butt AJ, Perks CM, Holly JM, Paraskeva C, Williams AC. Transcriptional upregulation of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein IGFBP-3 by sodium butyrate increases IGF-independent apoptosis in human colonic adenoma-derived epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:393-401 16. Conover CA. Potentiation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) action by IGF-binding protein-3: studies of underlying mechanism. Endocrinology 1992;130:3191-3199 17. Mohseni-Zadeh S, Binoux M Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) binding protein-3 interacts with the type 1 IGF receptor, reducing the affinity of the receptor for its ligand: an alternative mechanism in the regulation of IGF action. Endocrinology. 1997;138:5645-8 18. Grill CJ, Cohick WS. Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 mediates IGF-1 action in a bovine mammary epithelial cell line independent of an IGF interaction. J Cell Physiol 2000;183:273-83 19. Lopez-Bermejo A, Buckway CK, Devi GR, Hwa V, Plymate SR, Oh Y, Rosenfeld RG. Characterization of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-related proteins (IGFBP-rPs) 1, 2, and 3 in human prostate epithelial cells: potential roles for IGFBP-rP1 and 2 in senescence of the prostatic epithelium. Endocrinology 2000;141:4072-80 20. Powell-Braxton-L, Hollingshead P, Warburton C, Dowd M, Pitts-Meek S, Dalton D, Gillett N, Stewart TA. IGF-I is required for normal embryonic growth in mice. Genes Dev 1993;7:2609-2617 21. DeChiara TM, Efstratiadis A, Robertson EJ. A growth-deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor II gene disrupted by targeting. Nature 1990;345:78-80 22. DeChiara TM, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell 1991;64:849-859 23. Allan GJ, Flint DJ, Patel K. Insulin-like growth factor axis during embryonic development. Reproduction 2001;122:31-39 24. Liu JP, Baker J, Perkins AS, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-1) and type 1 IGF Receptor (IGF1R). Cell 1993;75:59-72 25. Louvi A, Accili D, Efstratiadis A. Growth-promoting interaction of IGF-II with the insulin receptor during mouse embryonic development. Dev Biol 1997;189:33-48 26. Frasca F, Pandini G, Scalia P, Sciacca L, Mineo R, Costantino A, Goldfine ID, Belfiore A, Vigneri R. Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:3278-3288 27. Merimee TJ, Zapf J, Froesch ER. Dwarfism in the pygmy. An isolated deficiency of insulin-like growth factor I. N Engl J Med 1981;305:965-968 28. Merimee TJ, Zapf J, Hewlett B, Cavalli-Sforza LL. Insulin-like growth factors in pygmies. The role of puberty in determining final stature. N Engl J Med 1987;316:906-911 29. Schwartz J, Brumbaugh RC, Chiu M. Short stature, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, and serum proteins in the Mountain Ok people of Papua New Guinea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987;65:901-905 30. Godowski PJ, Leung DW, Meacham LR, Galgani JP, Hellmiss R, Keret R, Rotwein PS, Parks JS, Laron Z, Wood WI. Characterization of the human growth hormone receptor gene and demonstration of a partial gene deletion in two patients with Laron- type dwarfism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:8083-8087
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
35
????
31. Laron Z. Laron syndrome (primary growth hormone resistance or insensitivity): the personal experience 1958-2003.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:1031-1044 32. Eigenmann JE, Amador A, Patterson DF. Insulin-like growth factor I levels in proportionate dogs, chondrodystrophic dogs and in giant dogs. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1988;118:105-108 33. Cohen MM Jr, Neri G, Weksberg R. Overgrowth syndromes. New York: Oxford University Press 2002 34. Cohen MM Jr. Perspectives on overgrowth syndromes. Am J Med Genet 1998;79:234-237 35. Weksberg R, Squire JA, Templeton DM. Glypicans: a growing trend. Nat Genet 1996;12:225-227 36. Marsh DJ, Dahia PL, Zheng Z, Liaw D, Parsons R, Gorlin RJ, Eng C. Germline mutations in PTEN are present in Bannayan-Zonana syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:333-334 37. Li M, Squire JA, Weksberg R. Molecular genetics of WiedemannBeckwith syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1998;79:253-259 38. Visser R, Matsumoto N. Genetics of Sotos syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr 2003;15:598-606 39. Rayasam GV, Wendling O, Angrand PO, Mark M, Niederreither K, Song L, Lerouge T, Hager GL, Chambon P, Losson R. NSD1 is essential for early post-implantation development and has a catalytically active SET domain. EMBO J 2003;22:3153-3163 40. Li M, Squire JA, Weksberg R. Molecular genetics of BeckwithWiedemann syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr 1997;9:623-629 41. Nakao M, Sasaki H. Genomic imprinting: significance in development and diseases and the molecular mechanisms. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1996;120:467-473 42. Brown KW, Villar AJ, Bickmore W, Clayton-Smith J, Catchpoole D, Maher ER, Reik W. Imprinting mutation in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome leads to biallelic IGF-2 expression through an H19-independent pathway. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:2027-2032 43. Ekstrom TJ. Parental imprinting and the IGF-2 gene. Horm Res 1994;42:176-181 44. Li X, Nong Z, Ekstrom C, Larsson E, Nordlinder H, Hofmann WJ, Trautwein C, Odenthal M, Dienes HP, Ekstrom TJ, Schirmacher P. Disrupted IGF-2 promoter control by silencing of promoter P1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 1997;57:2048-2054 45. Vu TH, Hoffman A. Alterations in the promoter-specific imprinting of the insulin-like growth factor-II gene in Wilms' tumor. J Biol Chem 1996;271:9014-9023 46. Hao Y, Crenshaw T, Moulton T, Newcomb E, Tycko B. Tumorsuppressor activity of H19 RNA. Nature 1993;365:764-767 47. Leighton PA, Ingram RS, Eggenschwiler J, Efstratiadis A, Tilghman SM. Disruption of imprinting caused by deletion of the H19 gene region in mice. Nature 1995;375:34-39 48. Steenman MJ, Rainier S, Dobry CJ, Grundy P, Horon IL, Feinberg AP. Loss of imprinting of IGF-2 is linked to reduced expression and abnormal methylation of H19 in Wilms' tumor Nat Genet 1994;7:433-439 49. Jouvenot Y, Ginjala V, Zhang L, Liu PQ, Oshimura M, Feinberg AP, Wolffe AP, Ohlsson R, Gregory PD. Targeted regulation of imprinted genes by synthetic zinc-finger transcription factors. Gene Ther 2003;10:513-522 50. Hatada I, Nabetani A, Morisaki H, Xin Z, Ohishi S, Tonoki H, Niikawa N, Inoue M, Komoto Y, Okada A, Steichen E, Ohashi H, Fukushima Y, Nakayama M, Mukai T. New p57KIP2 mutations in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Hum Genet 1997;100:681-683 51. Lee MP, DeBaun M, Randhawa G, Reichard BA, Elledge SJ, Feinberg AP. Low frequency of p57KIP2 mutation in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:304-309 52. Gosden R, Trasler J, Lucifero D, Faddy M. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003;361:1975-1977 53. Neri G, Marini R, Cappa M, Borrelli P, Opitz JM. SimpsonGolabi-Behmel syndrome: an X-linked encephalo-tropho-schisis syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1988;30:287-299 54. Neri G, Gurrieri F, Zanni G, Lin A. Clinical and molecular aspects of the Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1998;79:279-283
55. Weksberg R, Squire JA, Templeton DM. Glypicans: a growing trend. Nat Genet 1996;12:225-227 56. David G. Integral membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycans. FASEB J 1993;7:1023-1030 57. Pilia G, Hughes-Benzie RM, MacKenzie A, Baybayan P, Chen EY, Huber R, Neri G, Cao A, Forabosco A, Schlessinger D. Mutations in GPC3, a glypican gene, cause the Simpson-Golabi-Behmel overgrowth syndrome. Nat Genet 1996;12:241-247 58. Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM Jr, Condon LM, Burke BA. Bannayan-RileyRuvalcaba syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1992;44:307-314 59. Wilson PH, MacDonald DG, Felix DH. Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome: report of a family. Oral Dis 2001;7:310-314 60. Eng C. Will the real Cowden syndrome please stand up: revised diagnostic criteria. J Med Genet 2000;37:828-830 61. Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J, Dahia PL, Wang SI, Zheng Z, Bose S, Call KM, Tsou HC, Peacocke M, Eng C, Parsons R. Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:646-647 62. Marsh DJ, Dahia PL, Zheng Z, Liaw D, Parsons R, Gorlin RJ, Eng C. Germline mutations in PTEN are present in Bannayan-Zonana syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:333-334 63. Zhou XP, Waite KA, Pilarski R, Hampel H, Fernandez MJ, Bos C, Dasouki M, Feldman GL, Greenberg LA, Ivanovich J, Matloff E, Patterson A, Pierpont ME, Russo D, Nassif NT, Eng C. Germline PTEN promoter mutations and deletions in Cowden/Bannayan-RileyRuvalcaba syndrome result in aberrant PTEN protein and dysregulation of the phosphoinositol-3-kinase/Akt pathway. Am J Hum Genet 2003;73:404-411 64. Marsh DJ, Kum JB, Lunetta KL, Bennett MJ, Gorlin RJ, Ahmed SF, Bodurtha J, Crowe C, Curtis MA, Dasouki M, Dunn T, Feit H, Geraghty MT, Graham JM Jr, Hodgson SV, Hunter A, Korf BR, Manchester D, Miesfeldt S, Murday VA, Nathanson KL, Parisi M, Pober B, Romano C, Eng C. PTEN mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations in Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome suggest a single entity with Cowden syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:1461-1472 65. Di Cristofano A, Pandolfi PP. The multiple roles of PTEN in tumor suppression. Cell 2000;100:387-390 66. Garcia JM, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Gonzalez R, Navarro A, Carretero L, Provencio M, Espana P, Bonilla F. Allelic loss of the PTEN region (10q23) in breast carcinomas of poor pathophenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;57:237-243 67. Moorehead RA, Hojilla CV, De Belle I, Wood GA, Fata JE, Adamson ED, Watson KL, Edwards DR, Khokha R. Insulin-like growth factor-II regulates PTEN expression in the mammary gland. J Biol Chem 2003;278:50422-50427 68. Jenkins PJ, Fairclough PD, British Society for Gastroenterology; Association of Coloproctology for Great Britain and Ireland. Screening guidelines for colorectal cancer and polyps in patients with acromegaly. Gut 2002;51:13-14 69. Jenkins PJ, Frajese V, Jones AM, Camacho-Hubner C, Lowe DG, Fairclough PD, Chew SL, Grossman AB, Monson JP, Besser GM. Insulin-like growth factor I and the development of colorectal neoplasia in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3218-3221 70. Peoples R, Milatovich A, Francke U. Hemizygosity at the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF1R) locus and growth failure in the ring chromosome 15 syndrome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1995;70:228-234 71. Faivre L, Gosset P, Cormier-Daire V, Odent S, Amiel J, Giurgea I, Nassogne MC, Pasquier L, Munnich A, Romana S, Prieur M, Vekemans M, De Blois MC, Turleau C. Overgrowth and trisomy 15q26.1-qter including the IGF1 receptor gene: report of two families and review of the literature. Eur J Hum Genet 2002;10:699-706 72. Okubo Y, Siddle K, Firth H, O'Rahilly S, Wilson LC, Willatt L, Fukushima T, Takahashi S, Petry CJ, Saukkonen T, Stanhope R, Dunger DB. Cell proliferation activities on skin fibroblasts from a short child with absence of one copy of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) gene and a tall child with three copies of the IGF1R gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5981-5988
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
36
????
73. Nagai T, Shimokawa O, Harada N, Sakazume S, Ohashi H, Matsumoto N, Obata K, Yoshino A, Murakami N, Murai T, Sakuta R, Niikawa N. Postnatal overgrowth by 15q-trisomy and intrauterine growth retardation by 15q-monosomy due to familial translocation t(13;15): dosage effect of IGF1R? Am J Med Genet 2002;113:173-177 74. Abuzzahab MJ, Schneider A, Goddard A, Grigorescu F, Lautier C, Keller E, Kiess W, Klammt J, Kratzsch J, Osgood D, Pfaffle R, Raile K, Seidel B, Smith RJ, Chernausek SD, Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR) Study Group. IGF-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2211-2222 75. Woods KA, Camacho-Hubner C, Savage MO, Clark AJ. Intrauterine growth retardation and postnatal growth failure associated with deletion of the insulin-like growth factor I gene. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1363-1367 76. Mantzoros CS, Bolhke K, Moschos S, Cramer DW. Leptin in relation to carcinoma in situ of the breast: a study of pre-menopausal cases and controls. Int J Cancer 1999;80:523-526 77. Kanety H, Madjar Y, Dagan Y, Levi J, Papa MZ, Pariente C, Goldwasser B, Karasik A. Serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) is increased and IGFBP-3 is decreased in patients with prostate cancer: correlation with serum-specific antigen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77;229-233 78. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Michaud DS, Deroo B, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Pollak M. Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. The Lancet 1998;351:1393-1396 79. Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Gann PH, Ma J, Wilkinson P, Hennekens CH, Pollak M. Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Science 1998; 279:563-566 80. Shi R, Berkel HJ, Yu H. Insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2001;85:991-996 81. Giovannucci E, Pollak MN, Platz EA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Majeed N, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. A prospective study of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 and binding protein-3 and risk of colorectal neoplasia in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:345-349 82. Ma J, Pollak MN, Giovannucci E, Chan JM, Tao Y, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ. Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91;620-625 83. Holly JM, Gunnell DJ, Davey Smith G. Growth hormone, IGF-I and cancer. Less intervention to avoid cancer? More intervention to prevent cancer? J Endocrinol 1999;162:321-330 84. Cianfarani S, Tedeschi B, Germani D, Prete SP, Rossi P, Vernole P, Caporossi D, Boscherini B. In vitro effects of Growth Hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I and II (IGF-I and -II) on chromosome fragility and p53 protein expression in human lymphocytes. Eur J Clin Invest 1998;28:41-47
85. Cohen SM, Ellwein LB. Cell proliferation in carcinogenesis. Science 1990;249:1007-1011 86. Baserga R, Resnicoff M, Dews M. The IGF-I receptor and cancer. Endocrine 1997;7:99-102 87. Baserga R, Peruzzi F, Reiss K. The IGF-1 receptor in cancer biology. Int J Cancer 2003;107:873-877 88. Lahm H, Amstad P, Wyniger J, Yilmaz A, Fischer JR, Schreyer M, Givel JC. Blockade of the insulin-like growth-factor-I receptor inhibits growth of human colorectal cancer cells: evidence of a functional IGF-II-mediated autocrine loop. Int J Cancer 1994;58:452-459 89. Reinmuth N, Liu W, Fan F, Jung YD, Ahmad SA, Stoeltzing O, Bucana CD, Radinsky R, Ellis LM. Blockade of insulin-like growth factor I receptor function inhibits growth and angiogenesis of colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:3259-3269 90. Werner H, Karnieli E, Rauscher FJ III, LeRoith D. Wild-type and mutant p53 differentially regulate transcription of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:8318-8323 91. LeRoith D, Roberts CT Jr. The insulin-like growth factor system and cancer. Cancer Lett 2003;195:127-137 92. Willetts IE. Jessop and the Wilms' tumor. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1496-1498 93. Pritchard-Jones K, Kelsey A, Vujanic G, Imeson J, Hutton C, Mitchell C; United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group; Wilm's Tumor Working Group. Older age is an adverse prognostic factor in stage I, favorable histology Wilms' tumor treated with vincristine monochemotherapy: a study by the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group, Wilm's Tumor Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3269-3275 94. Rauscher FJ III. The WT1 Wilms tumor gene product: a developmentally regulated transcription factor in the kidney that functions as a tumor suppressor. FASEB J 1993;7:896-903 95. Werner H, Re GG, Drummond IA, Sukhatme VP, Rauscher FJ III, Sens DA, Garvin AJ, LeRoith D, Roberts CT Jr. Increased expression of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene, IGFIR, in Wilms’ tumor is correlated with modulation of IGFIR promoter activity by the WT1 Wilms’ tumor gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:5828-5832 96. Werner H, Rauscher FJ III, Sukhatme VP, Drummond IA, Roberts CT Jr, LeRoith D. Transcriptional repression of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-I-R) gene by the tumor suppressor WT1 involves binding to sequences both upstream and downstream of the IGF-I-R gene transcription start site. J Biol Chem 1994;269:12577-12582 97. Drummond IA, Madden SL, Rohwer-Nutter P, Bell GI, Sukhatme VP, Rauscher FJ III. Repression of the insulin-like growth factor II gene by the Wilms tumor suppressor W1. Science 1992;257:674-678 98. Bentov I, LeRoith D, Werner H. The WT1 Wilms' tumor suppressor gene: a novel target for insulin-like growth factor-I action. Endocrinology 2003;144:4276-4279
Pediatric Endocrinology Reviews (PER) ● Volume 2 ● No. 4 ● June 2004
37