The Journal of Immunology
Intratumoral Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Using IL-12 and Dendritic Cells Is an Effective Strategy To Control Recurrence of Murine Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed Mice Hiroto Kayashima,* Takeo Toshima,* Shinji Okano,† Akinobu Taketomi,* Noboru Harada,* Yo-ichi Yamashita,* Yukihiro Tomita,‡ Ken Shirabe,* and Yoshihiko Maehara* Liver transplantation is accepted as an effective therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, recurrence is one of the most fatal complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intratumoral immunotherapy using IL-12 gene therapy and dendritic cell injection for the purpose of effective treatment for HCC under conditions of immunosuppression. We found that the combined immunotherapy significantly induced sustained and high amounts of intratumoral IL-12 and IFN-g proteins and that it induced high HCC-specific CTL activity under immunosuppression as compared with each monotherapy or control. The combined immunotherapy also exerted effective antitumor effects on the immunosuppressed host, resulting in significant suppression of growth of the s.c. established tumor and complete suppression of lung and liver metastasis, without rejection of a fully allogeneic skin graft. These antitumor effects were dependent on both T cells and NK cells. Noteworthily, the combined intratumoral immunotherapy and tumor resection (that is, neoadjuvant immunotherapy) resulted in achievement of tumor-free and long-term survival of the some immunosuppressed mice, even when the mice were challenged with i.v. injection of HCC at the time of tumor resection. In contrast, all of the mice treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy using monotherapy or control therapy suffered from lung and liver metastasis. These results suggest that intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using IL-12 gene therapy and dendritic cell therapy is a potent effective strategy to control recurrence of HCC in patients after liver transplantation for HCC and may be applicable to general cancer treatment. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 698–708.
C
ancer immunotherapy is the fourth most promising strategy for standard cancer therapies after operations, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Cancer immunotherapy intrinsically has memory responses in the long-term period mediated by adaptive immune responses, which is in contrast to operations, radiation, or chemotherapy. Therefore, application of cancer immunotherapy is a most expectative for cure of patients with advanced cancer. To date, many protocols of immunotherapy have been developed, and a number of protocols have been applied to human trials and therapeutic strategy (1, 2). However, the effect of the therapy is extremely limited, even in cases in which tumor-specific CTL responses are detected when end-stage patients who are burdened with a well-established tumor are treated with cancer immunotherapies (2). The reason why large tumors are difficult to eradicate is *Department of Surgery and Science, †Division of Pathophysiological and Experimental Pathology, Department of Pathology, and ‡Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Received for publication January 21, 2010. Accepted for publication April 21, 2010. This work was partly supported by grants-in-aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17390372, 17590350) and the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (18790965). Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Shinji Okano, Division of Pathophysiological and Experimental Pathology, Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. E-mail address:
[email protected] The online version of this article contains supplemental material. Abbreviations used in this paper: BM-DC, bone marrow-derived dendritic cell; DC, dendritic cell; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LT, liver transplantation. Copyright Ó 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/10/$16.00 www.jimmunol.org/cgi/doi/10.4049/jimmunol.0900187
that the established large tumor can cause various adverse microenvironment for immune responses (3), including downregulation of MHC in tumor and tumor-associated stromal cells (4), production of TGF-b (4) and apoptosis-inducing factors (4), inhibition of dendritic cell (DC) differentiation and function (5), increment of regulatory T cells (6), prevention of CD8+ T cell recognition by immature myeloid cells (7), and immature microvessel formation preventing effective T cell infiltration (8). Therefore, reduction of absolute tumor volume to the level of subclinical disease may be required to obtain a stable and effective therapeutic response. In such a sense, development of neoadjuvant immunotherapy into standard cancer therapy may be a promising treatment. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent and malignant diseases worldwide. With an estimated 550,000 newly diagnosed cases per year, it is the third most common cause of deaths from cancer (9). Liver transplantation (LT) is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for end-stage liver failure, including early-stage HCC meeting the Milan criteria (a single tumor #5 cm in diameter or with #3 tumors all #3 cm in diameter), which is currently widely accepted as an effective way of selecting patients with HCC (10, 11). It was found that a significant proportion of patients with HCC who had tumors that were $5 cm could achieve long-term survival after LT in the context of multimodal adjuvant therapy (12). This previous finding led to the expansion of the indication of LT for HCC, including HCC exceeding the Milan criteria. However, it has been reported that cumulative HCC recurrence in patients meeting or exceeding the Milan criteria was 2.5 or 19.6% at 1 y and 2.5 or 36.6% at 3 y, respectively (13). When LT is performed as a therapy for HCC,
The Journal of Immunology recurrence is one of the most fatal complications. The survival of recurrent cases after LT is significantly poor despite systemic chemotherapy (12). One of the reasons could be because of the decrease in cancer immunosurveillance by immunosuppressants (14, 15). Therefore, to prevent recurrence under conditions of immunosuppression after LT for HCC, we need to develop a new active strategy, which prevents distant micrometastases without affecting graft function. IL-12 exerts a variety of immunomodulatory antitumor effects, including induction of IFN-g secretion from T cells and NK cells (16), promotion of maturation of CTLs (16), and induction of antiangiogenic effects (17). A number of experimental studies have demonstrated that local or systemic treatment with rIL-12 protein mediates profound antitumor effects in vivo, causing suppression of growth of established tumors and their distant metastasis (16). However, human clinical trials with IL-12 monotherapy have shown limited efficacy in most instances (18), suggesting that additional modification in IL-12–based immunotherapy should be developed to enhance the clinical response. We have also previously reported that electroporation-mediated IL-12 gene therapy is effective not only in inhibiting the growth of a wellestablished s.c. HCC, but also in suppressing lung metastasis by NK and T cells, even in sufficiently immunosuppressed mice (19). However, this antitumor effect was mainly dependent on NK cells, and T cell contribution was relatively weak, which could be important for inducing long-lived memory T cell responses to tumors for efficient antitumor effects in cancer immunotherapy (20). In contrast, we and others have reported that intratumoral administration of DCs, which are the most potent and professional APCs (20) that can prime and control Ag-specific T cell responses (21), induces a significant T cell-dependent antitumor effect concomitant with a strong T cell response to tumor Ags (22, 23). The mechanism of the antitumor effect by intratumoral DC injection is believed to be as follows: injected DCs capture tumor Ags in the tumor site and migrate into lymph nodes to prime tumor-Ag specific T cells (22). Therefore, this DC-based immunotherapy does not require that tumor Ags including peptide or tumor lysate be obtained (23). Considering the following features: 1) intratumoral administration of DC directly compensates for DC-defects in the tumor microenvironment (5); 2) the antitumor effect of intratumoral administration of DC is enhanced by an increment of local apoptotic tumor cells (22); 3) intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy exerts an antiangiogenic effect, which is mainly dependent on NK cells and by which tumor tissue undergoes necrosis (19); 4) IL-12 directly enhances T cell proliferation and function (24); and 5) IL-12 exerts various immunological adjuvant effects (25), intratumoral combined immunotherapy with IL-12 gene therapy and injection of DC warrant investigation. In the current study, we investigated the efficacy of intratumoral combined immunotherapy with IL-12 gene therapy and intratumoral DC injection for local antitumor effects and antimetastatic effects against well-established HCCs in mice under conditions of immunosuppression by FK506, which is a calcineurin inhibitor (26). We also assessed the efficacy of intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using the combined immunotherapy involved with tumor resection for prevention of HCC recurrence.
Materials and Methods Cell lines MH134 (H-2k), a murine HCC cell line induced using carbon tetrachloride in C3H mice, was obtained from the Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (Tohoku University,
699 Miyagi, Japan). X5563 (H-2k), a plasmacytoma cell line derived from the C3H strain, was obtained from the Division of Molecular and Cellular Immunology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation (Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan).
Animals Eight-week-old female C3H/HeN mice (H-2k) and BALB/c mice (H-2d) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Tokyo, Japan) and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility at the Kyushu University Medical School. These experiments were approved by the Kyushu University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to the guidelines outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the National Academy for Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health.
Plasmid DNA IL-12 plasmid vector, designated pCAGGS-IL-12 for IL-12 gene therapy, and an empty plasmid vector, designated pCAGGS for controls, were used in the study. Details including the construction of the vectors are as previously described (27, 28).
Generation of bone marrow-derived DCs Bone marrow-derived DCs (BM-DCs) were generated as we previously reported (23). On day 6, BM-DCs were collected and incubated with 0.5 mg/ml LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 8 h. BM-DCs were then collected and treated with 50 mg/ml polymyxin B (Sigma-Aldrich) to neutralize the free LPS and carefully washed by PBS (Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland) two times preinjection. The maturation status was confirmed by assessment of expression of costimulatory-related molecules (CD80, CD86, and ICAM-1) and I-Ak using flow cytometry (data not shown) (23).
Murine tumor model After MH134 cells were s.c. injected in the right flank of the C3H/HeN mice, 100 mg DNA solution at 1.0 mg/ml (pCAGGS-IL-12 or pCAGGS for controls) was injected into the established MH134 tumor, and electroporation was performed at the time when the tumor volume reached ∼0.5 cm3 (this time point is defined as day 0) (19, 27, 28). The electroporation was performed as follows: a pair of electrode needles was inserted into the tumor to a depth of 5 mm to encompass the DNA injection sites, and electric pulses were delivered using an electric pulse generator (CUY-21; BEX, Tokyo, Japan) at the optimal condition: 150 V, 50 ms in duration, and 10 shocks (27). We confirmed that ∼45% of the tumor cells in the in situ MH134 tumors were able to express enhanced GFP using pCAGGS-EGFP as a measure of the transduction efficiency (data not shown). On day 2 after the DNA injection, 1.0 3 106 BM-DC, which was suspended in 100 ml PBS or 100 ml PBS only for controls, was injected into the established s.c. MH134 tumor. From day 8 after the DNA injection, the mice were i.p. treated with 3 mg/kg FK506 (Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) every day. This dose was sufficient to prevent rejection of fully allogeneic skin grafts (19). On day 9 after the DNA injection, skin grafting was performed on the left flank of all mice using the allogeneic skin of BALB/c mice to assess the state of immunosuppression as previously described (19) (Fig. 1A). For a period of 28 d after the DNA injection, the tumor sizes were assessed using microcalipers, and the tumor volumes were calculated (29). For intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy, we added two procedures to the protocol as described above: on day 9 after the DNA injection (on day 7 after DC injection), the primary established s.c. MH134 tumor was surgically resected, and then the mice were challenged to i.v. injection with 5 3 105 MH134 cells (Fig. 6A).
Histopathological analysis of metastatic lesions The resected lungs and livers were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded sections were stained with H&E for histopathological analysis. The degree of metastasis was evaluated by the largest diameter (in micrometers) and the number of metastatic lesions at the maximum areas, which included a sagittal section through the left lobe of the lung and a horizontal section through the middle lobe of the liver.
ELISA for IL-12 and IFN-g Frozen specimens of the resected established s.c. HCCs were homogenized in an extraction buffer on ice and assayed for the heterodimeric IL-12 p70 (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and IFN-g (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA) using an ELISA kit. Each cytokine concentration was divided by the total protein concentration as previously described (19).
700
INTRATUMORAL NEOADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR HCC
Assay system for the secondary CTL response The assay for the secondary CTL response was performed as previously described (19, 23).
Ab-mediated depletion of immune cell subsets in vivo Anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 mAb, which was derived from GK1.5 or 53-6.72 hybridoma cells, respectively, was given i.p. (250 mg/dose) for CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cell depletion. The CD4- or CD8-depleting Ab eliminated the CD4+CD11c+ DC (30) or CD8a+CD11c+ DC (data not shown), respectively. Although the CD8a+CD42CD11c+ is exclusively crucial for crosspriming of CD8 T cells, other DCs can prime CD4 T cells. Therefore, we believe that there are no technical concerns for these Ab-mediated depletion studies in which CD4 T cell or CD8 T cell response is required to be eliminated. Antiasialo GM1 antiserum (Wako Bioproducts, Tokyo, Japan) was given i.p. (50 mg/dose) for NK cell depletion. Flow cytometry confirmed a .98% depletion of the target cells. Elimination of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, or NK cells in mice with an established MH134 was performed by i.p. injection on days 22, 21, and 0 and once every other day thereafter for an additional 26 d (16 times in total).
Skin grafting Skin grafting was performed as previously described (19, 31, 32). Briefly, square full-thickness skin grafts (1 cm2) were prepared from the trunk skin of BALB/c mice. Graft beds (1 cm2) were prepared on the left flank of the C3H mice. The donor grafts were fixed to the graft bed with eight interrupted sutures of 6-0 Proline thread (Johnson & Johnson, North Ryde, Australia) and covered with protective tape. The first inspection was conducted on day 7 after skin grafting followed by daily inspection. Grafts were considered as rejected at the time of complete sloughing or shrinking or when they formed a dry scar. The C3H-derived skin grafts were accepted in the syngeneic C3H mice without FK506 administration, whereas the BALB/c-derived allogeneic skin grafts showed massive chronic inflammatory infiltrates and were rejected on approximately day 7 when FK506 was not administered (Table I, Experiment 1). However, the allogeneic skin grafts could be successfully maintained during administration of FK506 for at least 40 d (Fig. 7, Table I, Experiments 2 and 3, and data not shown). The skin grafts eventually showed a reddish appearance and exhibited ulceration owing to massive chronic inflammatory cell infiltration when FK506 was abruptly withdrawn postadministration for 1 mo (33–35) (data not shown). Calcineurin inhibitors not only inhibit the proliferation of alloreactive naive T cells but also inhibit the apoptosis of alloreactive activated T cells (36). Therefore, the alloreactive T cells may proliferate and infiltrate into the grafted allogeneic donor skin postwithdrawal of FK506, resulting in rejection (data not shown). These observations suggest that long-term administration of FK506 does not result in tolerance induction and that the grafted skin can act as a biomarker for sufficient immunosuppression (34).
and assessed the primary established MH134 tumor under immunosuppression by FK506 (Fig. 1A). This was compared with therapies using pCAGGS-IL-12 and PBS (IL-12 monotherapy group), control empty plasmid vector (designated as pCAGGS) and BM-DCs (DC monotherapy group), and pCAGGS and PBS (control group). The growth of MH134 tumor in the combined therapy group was significantly inhibited, even if the mice were under immunosuppression by FK506, as compared with the IL-12 monotherapy group (p , 0.05), DC monotherapy group (p , 0.01), and control group (p , 0.01; Fig. 1). All skin grafts were maintained without any signs of rejection, suggesting that the dose of FK506 was sufficient to prevent rejection of a fully allogeneic graft (Table I, Experiments 1 and 2), and combined cancer immunotherapy did not disturb the control of allograft rejection by FK506. Intratumoral administration of DC in addition to IL-12 gene therapy maintains the expression of biologically active IL-12 and IFN-g proteins in tumors in immunosuppressed mice We previously reported that intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy (IL-12 monotherapy) resulted in suppression of growth of primary established s.c. HCC, even under immunosuppression through the
Statistical analysis All data are expressed as means 6 SEM. Statistical evaluations of numerical variables between different groups were mainly performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in tumor growth were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. Significant differences were determined by a post hoc test, Fisher’s exact probability test. The survival data were statistically analyzed by log-rank test. Significance was defined as p , 0.05. The analyses were performed with the use of Stat View software (version 5.0, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA) or the use of GraphPad Prism 4 software (version 4, GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Results Combined immunotherapy using intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy and intratumoral DC injection induces an enhanced antitumor effect on primary established HCC under immunosuppression by FK506 We previously found that electroporation-mediated IL-12 gene therapy is effective not only in treating local tumors but also in suppressing lung metastasis, and this antitumor effect was mainly dependent on NK cells (19). To enhance the T cell response to HCC, we combined IL-12 gene therapy with intratumoral administration of DC. We first examined the antitumor effect of the combined immunotherapy using intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy with the murine IL-12 plasmid vector (designated as pCAGGS-IL-12) and intratumoral injection of murine BM-DCs (combined therapy group)
FIGURE 1. Enhanced antitumor effect on a primary established HCC under conditions of immunosuppression by FK506 in combined immunotherapy using IL-12 gene transfer and DC. A, C3H/HeN mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor were treated with pCAGGS-IL-12 and BMDCs (combined therapy group: open circles), pCAGGS-IL-12 and PBS (IL-12 monotherapy group: closed circles), pCAGGS and BM-DCs (DC monotherapy group: open squares), and pCAGGS and PBS (control group: closed squares) as described in Materials and Methods. The day of plasmid injection is defined as day 0. From day 8, the mice were treated with 3 mg/ kg FK506 every day, and skin grafting was performed using allogeneic skin of BALB/c mice on day 9. The overall experimental design in the combined therapy group is illustrated beneath the line graph. The volumes of the established s.c. tumors were evaluated, and the data in the line graph are shown as mean tumor volume 6 SEM cm3. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Total numbers in each group (n = 8) and statistical p values (p , 0.05) are indicated in the graph. B, The photographs show representative macroscopic findings of established s.c. MH134 tumors on day 28 in each indicated group.
The Journal of Immunology
701
Table I. Survivals of skin grafts Intratumoral Treatment n Value
IL-12
DC
Skin Graft Donor
FK506
Survival Time of Skin Graft (d)a
C3H BALB/c
2 2
.50, .50, .50 7, 7, 8, 7
Experiment 1b 3 4 c
Experiment 2
8 8 8 8
2 + 2 +
2 2 + +
BALB/c BALB/c BALB/c BALB/c
+ + + +
9 6 12
2 + 2
2 2 +
BALB/c BALB/c BALB/c
+ + +
12
+
+
BALB/c
+
Experiment 3d
.19 .19 .19 .19
3 3 3 3
8 8 8 8
.15, .19 3 4, .21, .26, .33, .34 .19 3 3, .28, .33, .35 .15, .18, .19 3 3, .22 3 2, .27, .28, .32, .35, .40 .19 3 3, .27, .41, .42, .54 3 6
a
Number of days from skin grafting to when the recipients were sacrificed or died after skin grafting. b The indicated trunk skins were grafted on untreated C3H-recipient mice. c The BALB/c trunk skins were grafted on C3H-recipient mice, which were indicated in Fig. 1A. d The BALB/c trunk skins were grafted on C3H-recipient mice, which were indicated in Figs. 6 and 7.
cooperation of three mechanisms: the suppression of neovascularization of HCC, generation of tumor-specific CTLs, and enhancement of infiltration of various lymphocytes by local elevation of bioactive IL-12 (19) and IFN-g, which is considered to be the most important factor in IL-12 therapy (37). Therefore, we investigated the amount of intratumoral IL-12 and IFN-g proteins in this experimental setting. On day 7, the expression of intratumoral IL-12 protein in the combined therapy group was significantly higher compared with the DC monotherapy group (p , 0.05) and control group (p , 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the combined therapy group and IL-12 monotherapy group (Fig. 2A). However, on day 14, the expression of intratumoral IL-12 protein in the combined therapy group was significantly higher compared with the IL-12 monotherapy group (p , 0.05), the DC monotherapy group (p , 0.05), and the control group (p , 0.05) (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, we examined upregulation of intratumoral IFN-g protein as an indication of biological
FIGURE 2. Maintained expression of IL-12 and IFN-g proteins in tumors in immunosuppressed mice that had combined immunotherapy using IL-12 and DCs. Mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor in each group (combined therapy group: closed bars, n = 3; IL-12 monotherapy group: hatched bars, n = 3; DC monotherapy group: gray bars, n = 3; control group: open bars, n = 3) were sacrificed on day 7 (left panels) or on day 14 (right panels), and the s.c. tumors were resected. The protein levels of intratumoral IL-12 (A) and IFN-g (B) were estimated by ELISA. The data are indicated as mean protein levels 6 SEM and are representative of three independent experiments. Statistical significance by the MannWhitney U test (p , 0.05) is indicated in the bar graphs.
activity of IL-12 protein. The degree of expression of intratumoral IFN-g protein in each group was correlated with that of IL-12 protein (Fig. 2B). Therefore, biologically active IL-12 and IFN-g proteins could be maintained at significantly higher amounts in the primary established MH134 tumors in the combined therapy group than those in the other groups. Combined immunotherapy can effectively control spontaneous lung and liver metastasis in tumor-burdened mice under immunosuppression by FK506 In cancer immunotherapy, it is important to control metastasis for obtaining a curative effect or prolonging survival. Therefore, we examined the antimetastatic effects of combined immunotherapy for spontaneous lung and liver metastasis using the model as described in Fig. 1. The mice were sacrificed on day 28, and the degree of metastasis in lungs and livers was evaluated. Spontaneous lung metastasis was observed in five out of eight mice (63%) in the IL-12
702
INTRATUMORAL NEOADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR HCC
monotherapy group, eight out of eight mice (100%) in the DC monotherapy group, and eight out of eight mice (100%) in the control group (Fig. 3A–C). Spontaneous liver metastasis was observed in six out of eight mice (75%) in the IL-12 monotherapy group, eight out of eight mice (100%) in DC monotherapy group, and eight out of eight mice (100%) in the control group (Fig. 3D–F). Interestingly, no spontaneous lung and liver metastases could be detected in the combined therapy group, even if the mice were under immunosuppression by FK506. These findings suggest that the combination of intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy and DC injection could additively or synergistically enhance the antimetastatic effect for spontaneous lung and liver metastasis, even if the mice were under immunosuppression by FK506. Combined immunotherapy using intratumoral DC injection and IL-12 gene therapy enhances and maintains systemic MH134-specific CTL responses in mice under immunosuppression by FK506 CTLs play an important role in suppressing tumor progression and metastasis (38, 39), and a maintained tumor Ag-specific CTL response is important for an enhanced antitumor effect (40, 41). To assess the mechanism by which combined immunotherapy induces enhanced antitumor and antimetastatic effects, we investigated systemic MH134-specific CTL activities. As expected, the CTL response from mice in the combined therapy group was higher than that in the IL-12 monotherapy group, the DC monotherapy group, and the control group on day 7 after the DNA injection (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, on day 14 after the DNA injection, the
FIGURE 3. Effective control of spontaneous lung and liver metastasis in combined immunotherapy under conditions of immunosuppression. Mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor in each indicated group (as described in Fig. 1) were sacrificed on day 28, and metastasis of MH134 in the lungs (A–C) and livers (D–F) was microscopically evaluated with H&E staining. The bar graphs (combined therapy group: closed bars, n = 8; IL-12 monotherapy group: hatched bars, n = 8; DC monotherapy group: gray bars, n = 8; control group: open bars, n = 8) show the largest diameter (in micrometers) of metastatic foci (A, D) and the number of metastatic lesions (B, E). The data shown are mean value 6 SEM and representative of three independent experiments. Statistical significance by the Mann-Whitney U test (p , 0.05; p , 0.01) is indicated in the bar graphs. The frequency of metastasis (number of mice with metastasis/total number of experimental animals) is indicated above the bars in each group (B, E). The photographs show representative microscopic findings of the resected lungs (C, original magnification 3200) and livers (F, main photographs, original magnification 3200; insets, 3400) in each group. Arrows indicate the typical findings of microscopically metastatic foci.
CTL response in the combined therapy group was maintained and significantly higher than that in the IL-12 monotherapy group, the DC monotherapy group, and the control group (Fig. 4B). In additional experiments, it was confirmed that such an augmented CTL response was MH134 specific, because the generated CTLs had no killing toward the third-party plasmacytoma X5563, derived from the C3H strain (Table II). Therefore, a systemic MH134-specific CTL response could be maintained at a significantly higher level in the combined therapy group than that in the IL-12 or DC monotherapy group, even if the mice were under immunosuppression by FK506. T cells and NK cells are indispensable for inhibition of primary tumor growth and the antimetastatic effect of combined immunotherapy in an immunosuppressed host To determine which subsets of cells are essential for control of local tumor growth and antimetastatic effects in combined immunotherapy using IL-12 and DCs under immunosuppression by FK506, we conducted depletion studies of immune cell subsets by administration of depleting Abs against CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and NK cells in mice with an established MH134 tumor treated by combined immunotherapy. Depletion of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, or NK cells abrogated the inhibition of growth of primary s.c. MH134 tumors in combined immunotherapy (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, depletion of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, or NK cells cancelled the antimetastatic effects of the immunotherapy for spontaneous lung and liver metastasis under immunosuppression by FK506. Both spontaneous lung and liver metastasis were
The Journal of Immunology
703
FIGURE 4. Enhancement and maintenance of the MH134-specific CTL response in combined immunotherapy under conditions of immunosuppression. Mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor in each group (as described in Fig. 1) were sacrificed on day 7 (A) or on day 14 (B), and splenocytes were restimulated with mitomycin C-treated MH134. The generated effector cells were harvested and a standard [51Cr] release assay against MH134 was performed. The data shown are mean percent-specific lysis 6 SEM of triplicate wells at the indicated E:T ratio (x-axis). Data are representative of two independent experiments. Individual symbols correspond to those of each group as indicated in Fig. 1A.
observed in three out of three mice (100%) in groups with CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, and NK cell depletion (Fig. 5B–E). There were no significant differences in the mean largest diameter and number of spontaneous lung and liver metastases among each group with CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, and NK cell depletion (Fig. 5B–E). Data from the CTL response and these findings suggested that intratumoral DC therapy in addition to IL-12 gene therapy could augment the T cell response and both local tumor growth suppression and antimetastatic effects of the combined immunotherapy were dependent on coordination of the T cell and NK cell response. Intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using injection of DC and IL-12 gene therapy controls HCC recurrence and improves the survival of immunosuppressed mice The purpose of this study was to develop a new effective therapy to prevent recurrence of HCC under conditions of immunosuppression after LT for HCC, resulting in a bona fide curative operation. We designed a neoadjuvant immunotherapy model using intratumoral DC injection and intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy. We added two procedures to the protocol as described above (Fig. 1A): on day 9 after the DNA injection, when there were no differences among the volumes of the primary established s.c. HCC in each group, the primary established s.c. HCC was surgically resected, and then the mice were challenged to i.v. injection with MH134 cells (Fig. 6). The i.v. injection of MH134 cells was performed for the purpose of confirming the antimetastatic effect by overloading with circulating HCC and for mimicking the clinical situation in which dissemination to circulation by manipulation during operation of LT for HCC. Lung and liver metastases were evaluated on day 28. Lung metastasis was observed in three out of three mice (100%) in the IL-12 monotherapy group, two out of three mice Table II. Specificity of secondary CTL response Percent Specific Lysis at E:T Ratioa
Target Cell
Combined Therapy
IL-12 Monotherapy
DC Monotherapy
Control
14.2 1.3
11.2 0.9
4.5 0.6
0.0 0.5
22.8 1.9
11.0 1.2
4.9 0.6
0.0 0.1
b
Day 7 MH134 X5563 Day 14b MH134 X5563
a Data indicate mean percent specific lysis of triplicate wells at an E:T ratio of 80:1. b On day 7 and day 14, splenocytes were harvested from mice in the indicated group as described in Fig. 1. Effector cells were generated as described in Fig. 4, and a [51Cr] release assay for MH134 or X5563, a third-party control, was also performed.
(67%) in the DC monotherapy group, and three out of three mice (100%) in the control group. Liver metastasis was observed in three out of three mice (100%) in the IL-12 monotherapy group, three out of three mice (100%) in the DC monotherapy group, and three out of three mice (100%) in the control group (Fig. 6). No lung or liver metastasis could be detected in the combined therapy group, even if the mice were under immunosuppression by FK506. Furthermore, we investigated the survival of the mice in each experimental group. All of the mice in the control group, the IL-12 monotherapy group, and the DC monotherapy group died within 60 d, whereas six out of nine mice in the combined immunotherapy group were alive on day 70 (Fig. 7A). We confirmed the cause of death was tumor metastasis involving lung, liver, and lymph node (Fig. 7B and data not shown). In addition, we did not detect tumor metastasis involving lung, liver, and lymph node in the long-survived mice in the combined therapy group with histological examination at the end of the experiment (data not shown). None of the skin grafts were rejected, suggesting that the immunosuppression was sufficient to control rejection and was not hampered by the immunotherapy (Fig. 7B, Table I, Experiment 3). These findings suggest that both intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy and intratumoral injection of DC are required to obtain antimetastatic effects for HCC under immunosuppression by FK506 in neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
Discussion In this study, we demonstrated that combined immunotherapy using intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy and intratumoral injection of DCs exerted a strong antitumor effect, including suppression of local tumor growth and inhibition of lung and liver metastases in sufficiently immunosuppressed mice by FK506. In addition, intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using the combined immunotherapy controlled HCC recurrence of immunosuppressed mice without rejection of allogeneic skin grafts. To our knowledge, this is the first report of intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using a combination of electroporation-mediated intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy and DC-based immunotherapy under conditions of immunosuppression. In our institution, LT was carried out for 90 patients with HCC, and 53 (59%) patients preoperatively exceeded the Milan criteria. HCC recurrence was recognized in 14 (16%) out of 90 patients, and 13 (93%) out of 14 patients with recurrence exceeded the Milan criteria. The overall survival rates in patients meeting or exceeding the Milan criteria was 100 or 85.5% at 1 y, 100 or 68.2% at 3 y, and 100 or 68.2% at 5 y, respectively (data not shown) (42). Therefore, we believe that intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using combined immunotherapy is a promising strategy for increasing the rate of curative operations in LT for HCC and for improving the prognosis of patients with HCC exceeding the Milan criteria.
704
INTRATUMORAL NEOADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR HCC
FIGURE 5. Essential roles of both T cells and NK cells for inhibition of primary tumor growth and antimetastatic effects in combined immunotherapy in an immunosuppressed host. Mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor were treated with pCAGGS-IL-12 and BM-DCs (combined therapy group). To eliminate CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, or NK cells, the mice were treated with each depletion Ab from day 22 to day 28 as described in the Materials and Methods. A, The volumes of the primary established tumor were evaluated, and data in the line graph are shown as mean tumor volume 6 SEM cm3 (depletion of CD8+ T cells: closed squares, n = 3; depletion of CD4+ T cells: open squares, n = 3; depletion of NK cells: closed circles, n = 3; controls: open circles, n = 3). The statistical p values (p , 0.05) are indicated in the graph. B–E, The metastasis of MH134 in the lungs (B, C) and liver (D, E) was microscopically evaluated with H&E staining. The bar graphs (depletion of CD8+ T cells: hatched bars, n = 3; depletion of CD4+ T cells: gray bars, n = 3; depletion of NK cells: open bars, n = 3; controls: black bars, n = 3) show the largest diameter (in micrometers) of metastatic foci (B, D) and the number of metastatic lesions (C, E). The data shown are mean value 6 SEM. Statistical significance by the Mann-Whitney U test (p , 0.05) is indicated in the bar graphs. The frequency of metastasis (number of mice with metastasis/total number of experimental animals) is indicated above the bars in each group (C, E).
Although early clinical trials have shown promising results (43, 44), during the last decade, clinical trials of DC-based immunotherapy have shown a relatively limited clinical outcome against intractable malignancies (2, 45). Human clinical trials with IL-12 monotherapy and other immunotherapies have also shown limited efficacy in most instances (18, 46). In these clinical trials, immunotherapy has been used to treat patients in advanced stages of cancer. Because well-established cancers display multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms to evade an immune response, it may be difficult to eradicate a solid cancer completely (5, 8, 47, 48). These features are also true of experimental rodent models; for example, intratumoral DC treatment can frequently cure mice with established murine B16-F1 melanoma, of which the largest diameter is ,0.7 cm, but it is difficult to cure mice with B16-F1, of which the diameter is .0.7 cm (23)(S. Okano, unpublished observation). Encouraging experimental evidence suggests that the systemic highly immunosuppressive status can be normalized by resection of the established tumor (49). In fact, intratumoral combined immunotherapy could not eradicate large established HCC even with a lasting HCC-specific CTL response and high IL-12bioactivity, but, just in a neoadjuvant setting, the therapy could achieve tumor-free and long-term survival of the mice. Our combined immunotherapy targeted the primary tumor site for the following reasons: 1) it is difficult to obtain a sufficient Ag or
autologous tumor lysate for DC immunotherapy in the preoperative period when performing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and also to take measures against Ag loss variants; 2) intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy-mediated tumor necrosis (19) can be an abundant source of tumor Ag for DCs (22); 3) local IL-12 gene therapy can avoid adverse effects caused by systemic IL-12 treatment; and 4) local IL-12 effectively recruits intratumoral NK cells (19) that mutually interact with DCs, and this interaction enhances the function of both NK cells and DCs, resulting in augmentation of the T cell response (50). We demonstrated that the intratumoral combined immunotherapy exerted an enhanced and lasting HCC-specific CTL response associated with enhanced and sustained IL-12– IFN-g-production in HCC. The enhanced CTL response may be an important factor for eliciting an enhanced antimetastatic effect as compared with monotherapy. Tatsumi et al. (51) reported that s.c. vaccination of tumor lysate-pulsed DCs at a 7-d period over a 3-wk period and systemic IL-12 administration for 5 consecutive d after each immunization suppresses local s.c. HCC, and IL-12 enhances CTL responses mediated by DCs, although they did not evaluate the antimetastatic effect. We have also found the following: 1) intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy elicited an HCC-specific CTL response probably through host-derived DCs (19); 2) intratumoral DC monotherapy could eradicate not only treated established B16-F1 but also distant B16-F1 melanoma; however, this
The Journal of Immunology
705
FIGURE 6. Inhibition of recurrence of HCC with intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using injection of DC and IL-12 gene therapy in immunosuppressed mice. The mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor were treated with pCAGGS-IL-12 and BM-DCs (combined therapy group: closed bars; n = 3), pCAGGS-IL-12 and PBS (IL-12 monotherapy group: hatched bars; n = 3), pCAGGS and BM-DCs (DC monotherapy group: gray bars; n = 3), and pCAGGS and PBS (control group: open bars; n = 3). From day 8, the mice were treated with FK506 every day. On day 9, the primary established MH134 tumor was surgically resected, skin grafting from BALB/c mice was performed, and then the mice were challenged with an i.v. injection with MH134 cells. A, The overall experimental design in the combined therapy group is illustrated. The mean largest diameter (left panels) and number (right panels) of lung (B, C) and liver (D, E) metastatic lesions were evaluated. The data shown are mean 6 SEM. Statistical significance by the Mann-Whitney U test (p , 0.05) is indicated in the bar graphs. The frequency of metastasis (number of mice with metastasis/total number of experimental animals) is indicated above the bars in each group (C, E). The data are representative of two independent experiments.
was not the case for vaccination of tumor lysate-pulsed DCs in a distant site (23) (S. Okano, unpublished observation); 3) intratumoral DC monotherapy could eradicate B16-F1 in IL-12R b2 (high-affinity IL-12R)-deficient mice at the same rate as in wildtype mice (S. Okano, unpublished observation), suggesting that intratumoral DC therapy does not absolutely require IL-12 and that concomitant intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy can synergistically augment the antitumor effect of DC therapy. It is likely that targeting tumor sites can also have a beneficial influence on the enhanced antitumor effects in our protocol. In fact, at least with regard to the response of NK cells, contribution of NK cells, from which an early source of IFN-g is strictly required for Th1 response (50, 52), was essential in our intratumoral combination therapy (Fig. 5). In contrast, the contribution of NK cells was small in Tatsumi’s et al. protocol (51). CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, or NK cells can independently exert antitumor effects with different mechanisms (50, 53). If each of the cell types independently exerts an antitumor immune response in our combined immunotherapy, a depletion study should show a partial decrease in the antitumor effect. However, depletion of a single subset among CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells abrogated the antitumor effect, including inhibition of local primary tumor growth and suppression of distant metastasis in combined immunotherapy using IL-12 and DCs (Fig. 5). These findings suggest that mutual interactions among all of the subsets are required for inducing sufficient antitumor effects. Because the
depletion was performed preimmunotherapy in our protocol, these immune subsets may have an essential role in the T cell-priming phase. We previously reported that in IL-12 gene therapy alone under immunosuppression by FK506, NK cells played a critical role, and contribution of T cells is partial for the antitumor effect, even in the successful priming of the HCC-specific CD8+ T cell response (19). Therefore, we believe that it is important that intratumoral DC therapy in addition to IL-12 gene therapy augment the T cell response through cross-talk of DC-NKT cells in the T cellpriming phase, resulting in sufficient antimetastatic effects. FK506 forms a complex with FK506-binding protein. This complex can bind to calcineurin and block its ability to activate NFAT1. As a result, the inductions of several lymphokines, including IL2, are inhibited (26). Regarding the priming of naive T cells, FK506 is able to block the priming (proliferation) of naive T cells via inhibition of IL-2 production. Gardner et al. (35) previously suggested that calcineurin inhibitors may arrest the immune response at an early stage and maintain this situation while they are still being administered. When the drug treatment is stopped and the drug effects have worn off, the immune response begins (reversible effect). Regarding activated effector or memory T cells, FK506 prevents apoptosis of activated T cells and is unable to block the proliferation of activated T cells (54). Therefore, it is possible that once T cells are primed to resist apoptosis and suppress their effector function under FK506 administration, this leads to the accumulation of tumor-specific T cells in FK506injected mice for long periods. In line with this hypothesis, we
706
INTRATUMORAL NEOADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR HCC
FIGURE 7. Prolonged survival and inhibition of recurrence of HCC with intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy using injection of DC and IL-12 gene therapy in immunosuppressed mice. The mice with an established s.c. MH134 tumor were treated with pCAGGS-IL-12 and BM-DCs (combined therapy group: open circles; n = 9), pCAGGS-IL-12 and PBS (IL-12 monotherapy group: closed circles; n = 3), pCAGGS and BM-DCs (DC monotherapy group: open squares; n = 9), and pCAGGS and PBS (control group: closed squares; n = 6). From day 8, the mice were treated with FK506 every day. On day 9, the primary established MH134 tumor was surgically resected, skin grafting from BALB/c mice was performed, and then the mice were challenged with an i.v. injection with MH134 cells. A, The survivals in each experimental group are shown. Significant differences in survival were observed in the indicated groups compared with that in combined therapy group (pp , 0.01). The data were obtained from three separate experiments. B, The photographs show representative macroscopic findings of skin graft on mice in each group (combined therapy, day 51 after IL-12 treatment; IL-12 monotherapy, day 37 after IL-12 treatment; DC monotherapy, day 44 after control plasmid treatment; control, day 35 after control plasmid treatment). The circles indicate skin grafts, and all of the graft is viable. The arrow indicates macroscopic findings of lymph node swelling due to tumor metastasis.
previously observed enhanced MH134-specific CTL activity in mice under FK506 administration compared with immunocompetent mice during intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy (19). In the present experimental setting, administration of FK506 was started 8 d after the combined immunotherapy. In the general immune response at that time, the number of activated T cells is at its peak, and the activated T cells undergo apoptosis thereafter (contraction phase). In contrast, the alloresponse to the donor graft is only in the priming phase. Considering the reciprocal effects of FK506 on the priming of naive T cells and apoptosis of activated T cells, the protocol in the current study may be suitable for maximal exertion of the tumor-specific immune response for the long term while preventing the rejection of donor grafts. This hypothesis is supported by our observation that enhanced MH134-specific CTL activity was detected on day 14 compared with day 7 (Fig. 4, Table II), resulting in complete and long-lasting antimetastatic effects (Figs. 6, 7) while maintaining the skin graft (Table I, Experiment 3). The preoperative period is limited for performing immunotherapy. Therefore, it is noteworthy that it takes only 1 wk to perform intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy with our combination therapy for a sufficient antimetastatic effect, even under immunosuppression. In addition, with LT for HCC, initial metastases are found in extrahepatic sites rather than in the liver,
which is the common initial site of recurrence posthepatectomy for HCC. Therefore, it is an important finding that lung metastasis was suppressed in combined immunotherapy. However, adverse effects related to intratumoral injection should be considered in this protocol. In clinical settings, we have already used technical equipment for direct approaches to tumor sites, such as radiofrequency ablation therapy. Recently, a new device, the bipolar radiofrequency ablation device, has been developed (55). This new device has two electrodes and is able to not only turn on the power for liver nodules, such that larger tumor nodules can be treated, but also turn on the power for electroporation. In this study, we separately performed electroporation-mediated intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy and DC injection via the intratumoral route. For intratumoral IL-12 gene therapy, administration of an adenoviral vector encoding the IL-12 gene may be a safe and alternative tool (56, 57), whereby an additional device or procedure is not needed, and the administration has already been assessed for safety (57). We may be able to use injection of plasmid DNA encoding IL-12 alone because of the long-lasting IL-12 production achieved by such injections, which is caused by autocrine or paracrine positive feedback mechanisms involving several cell populations, including NK cells (58). Alternatively, we may be able to use DCs engineered to produce IL-12 (59–68) because previous studies have shown that the transduced IL-12 can augment the DC function to activate T cells and NK cells (65, 68, 69), IL-12 genetransduced DC injection via an intratumoral route exerts superior antitumor effects in preclinical settings (61, 62), and phase I clinical trials of various advanced digestive tumors including HCC, in which the treatment was feasible and well tolerated, achieved one partial response and two stable disease among 17 patients (70, 71). In our previous report (19), we also focused on the treatment target of recurrent HCC, and we are also interested in the effect of this combined immunotherapy on the donor graft, which is maintained by FK506. We examined this point using our skin graft model and found the combined immunotherapy did not hamper the suppression of graft rejection by FK506, even when the targeting tumor had existed just beneath the skin graft (Supplemental Fig. 1). Therefore, the combined immunotherapy may also have potential for treatment of recurrent HCCs in the donor liver graft in clinical settings. Further extensive preclinical studies should be performed before clinical application. In conclusion, intratumoral neoadjuvant immunotherapy has the potential to become a new effective therapeutic strategy to contribute to the improvement of long-term survival after LT for HCC. In addition, based on careful medical ethics, preoperative active immunotherapy and operations targeting the primary cancer as a total cancer therapy should be applied to the clinical setting in the same manner as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapies.
Acknowledgments We thank Prof. Miyazaki in the Department of Nutrition and Physiological Chemistry, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, for kindly providing the IL-12 expression plasmid (pCAGGS-IL-12).
Disclosures The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
References 1. Waldmann, T. A. 2003. Immunotherapy: past, present and future. Nat. Med. 9: 269–277. 2. Rosenberg, S. A., J. C. Yang, and N. P. Restifo. 2004. Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines. Nat. Med. 10: 909–915. 3. Zou, W. 2005. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5: 263–274.
The Journal of Immunology 4. Kim, R., M. Emi, K. Tanabe, and K. Arihiro. 2006. Tumor-driven evolution of immunosuppressive networks during malignant progression. Cancer Res. 66: 5527–5536. 5. Gabrilovich, D. 2004. Mechanisms and functional significance of tumourinduced dendritic-cell defects. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4: 941–952. 6. Zou, W. 2006. Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6: 295–307. 7. Nagaraj, S., K. Gupta, V. Pisarev, L. Kinarsky, S. Sherman, L. Kang, D. L. Herber, J. Schneck, and D. I. Gabrilovich. 2007. Altered recognition of antigen is a mechanism of CD8+ T cell tolerance in cancer. Nat. Med. 13: 828–835. 8. Hamzah, J., M. Jugold, F. Kiessling, P. Rigby, M. Manzur, H. H. Marti, T. Rabie, S. Kaden, H. J. Gro¨ne, G. J. Ha¨mmerling, et al. 2008. Vascular normalization in Rgs5-deficient tumours promotes immune destruction. Nature 453: 410–414. 9. Parkin, D. M., F. Bray, J. Ferlay, and P. Pisani. 2005. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J. Clin. 55: 74–108. 10. Mazzaferro, V., E. Regalia, R. Doci, S. Andreola, A. Pulvirenti, F. Bozzetti, F. Montalto, M. Ammatuna, A. Morabito, and L. Gennari. 1996. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 334: 693–699. 11. Eguchi, S., M. Takatsuki, M. Hidaka, Y. Tajima, and T. Kanematsu. 2008. Evolution of living donor liver transplantation over 10 years: experience of a single center. Surg. Today 38: 795–800. 12. Roayaie, S., J. S. Frischer, S. H. Emre, T. M. Fishbein, P. A. Sheiner, M. Sung, C. M. Miller, and M. E. Schwartz. 2002. Long-term results with multimodal adjuvant therapy and liver transplantation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 centimeters. Ann. Surg. 235: 533–539. 13. Todo, S., H. Furukawa, and Japanese Study Group on Organ Transplantation. 2004. Living donor liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: experience in Japan. Ann. Surg. 240: 451–459, discussion 459–461. 14. Ceriello, A., F. Mezza, S. Cozzolino, G. Pettinato, A. Mancini, W. Santaniello, F. Calise, and O. Cuomo. 1994. Role of immunosuppression in recurrence after liver transplantation for diethylnitrosamine-induced tumors in rats. Transpl. Int. 7(Suppl 1): S204–S207. 15. Yokoyama, I., B. Carr, H. Saitsu, S. Iwatsuki, and T. E. Starzl. 1991. Accelerated growth rates of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Cancer 68: 2095–2100. 16. Colombo, M. P., and G. Trinchieri. 2002. Interleukin-12 in anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 13: 155–168. 17. Voest, E. E., B. M. Kenyon, M. S. O’Reilly, G. Truitt, R. J. D’Amato, and J. Folkman. 1995. Inhibition of angiogenesis in vivo by interleukin 12. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87: 581–586. 18. Del Vecchio, M., E. Bajetta, S. Canova, M. T. Lotze, A. Wesa, G. Parmiani, and A. Anichini. 2007. Interleukin-12: biological properties and clinical application. Clin. Cancer Res. 13: 4677–4685. 19. Harada, N., M. Shimada, S. Okano, T. Suehiro, Y. Soejima, Y. Tomita, and Y. Maehara. 2004. IL-12 gene therapy is an effective therapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma in immunosuppressed mice. J. Immunol. 173: 6635– 6644. 20. Klebanoff, C. A., L. Gattinoni, and N. P. Restifo. 2006. CD8+ T-cell memory in tumor immunology and immunotherapy. Immunol. Rev. 211: 214–224. 21. Banchereau, J., and R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392: 245–252. 22. Candido, K. A., K. Shimizu, J. C. McLaughlin, R. Kunkel, J. A. Fuller, B. G. Redman, E. K. Thomas, B. J. Nickoloff, and J. J. Mule´. 2001. Local administration of dendritic cells inhibits established breast tumor growth: implications for apoptosis-inducing agents. Cancer Res. 61: 228–236. 23. Shibata, S., S. Okano, Y. Yonemitsu, M. Onimaru, S. Sata, H. Nagata-Takeshita, M. Inoue, T. Zhu, M. Hasegawa, Y. Moroi, et al. 2006. Induction of efficient antitumor immunity using dendritic cells activated by recombinant Sendai virus and its modulation by exogenous IFN-beta gene. J. Immunol. 177: 3564–3576. 24. Pflanz, S., J. C. Timans, J. Cheung, R. Rosales, H. Kanzler, J. Gilbert, L. Hibbert, T. Churakova, M. Travis, E. Vaisberg, et al. 2002. IL-27, a heterodimeric cytokine composed of EBI3 and p28 protein, induces proliferation of naive CD4(+) T cells. Immunity 16: 779–790. 25. Portielje, J. E., J. W. Gratama, H. H. van Ojik, G. Stoter, and W. H. Kruit. 2003. IL-12: a promising adjuvant for cancer vaccination. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 52: 133–144. 26. Hemenway, C. S., and J. Heitman. 1999. Calcineurin. Structure, function, and inhibition. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 30: 115–151. 27. Yamashita, Y. I., M. Shimada, H. Hasegawa, R. Minagawa, T. Rikimaru, T. Hamatsu, S. Tanaka, K. Shirabe, J. I. Miyazaki, and K. Sugimachi. 2001. Electroporation-mediated interleukin-12 gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the mice model. Cancer Res. 61: 1005–1012. 28. Yamashita, Y., M. Shimada, R. Minagawa, E. Tsujita, N. Harimoto, S. Tanaka, K. Shirabe, J. Miyazaki, and Y. Maehara. 2004. Muscle-targeted interleukin-12 gene therapy of orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma in mice using in vivo electrosonoporation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 3: 1177–1182. 29. Ramos, H. C., J. Reyes, K. Abu-Elmagd, A. Zeevi, N. Reinsmoen, A. Tzakis, A. J. Demetris, J. J. Fung, B. Flynn, J. McMichael, et al. 1995. Weaning of immunosuppression in long-term liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 59: 212–217. 30. Kamath, A. T., J. Pooley, M. A. O’Keeffe, D. Vremec, Y. Zhan, A. M. Lew, A. D’Amico, L. Wu, D. F. Tough, and K. Shortman. 2000. The development, maturation, and turnover rate of mouse spleen dendritic cell populations. J. Immunol. 165: 6762–6770. 31. Iwai, T., Y. Tomita, S. Okano, I. Shimizu, Y. Yasunami, T. Kajiwara, Y. Yoshikai, M. Taniguchi, K. Nomoto, and H. Yasui. 2006. Regulatory roles of NKT cells in
707
32. 33.
34.
35. 36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45. 46. 47.
48.
49. 50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55. 56.
57. 58.
59. 60.
the induction and maintenance of cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance. J. Immunol. 177: 8400–8409. Mayumi, H., K. Nomoto, and R. A. Good. 1988. A surgical technique for experimental free skin grafting in mice. Jpn. J. Surg. 18: 548–557. Inamura, N., K. Nakahara, T. Kino, T. Goto, H. Aoki, I. Yamaguchi, M. Kohsaka, and T. Ochiai. 1988. Prolongation of skin allograft survival in rats by a novel immunosuppressive agent, FK506. Transplantation 45: 206–209. Wada, H., M. Monden, M. Gotoh, H. Nakano, Y. Kita, and T. Mori. 1991. An attempt to induce tolerance to skin grafts in congenic mice with FK 506. Transplant. Proc. 23: 3280–3281. Gardner, C. R. 1995. The pharmacology of immunosuppressant drugs in skin transplant rejection in mice and other rodents. Gen. Pharmacol. 26: 245–271. Li, Y., X. C. Li, X. X. Zheng, A. D. Wells, L. A. Turka, and T. B. Strom. 1999. Blocking both signal 1 and signal 2 of T-cell activation prevents apoptosis of alloreactive T cells and induction of peripheral allograft tolerance. Nat. Med. 5: 1298–1302. Qin, Z., J. Schwartzkopff, F. Pradera, T. Kammertoens, B. Seliger, H. Pircher, and T. Blankenstein. 2003. A critical requirement of interferon gamma-mediated angiostasis for tumor rejection by CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res. 63: 4095–4100. Romero, P., J. C. Cerottini, and D. E. Speiser. 2004. Monitoring tumor antigen specific T-cell responses in cancer patients and phase I clinical trials of peptidebased vaccination. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 53: 249–255. Zhou, Y., M. L. Bosch, and M. L. Salgaller. 2002. Current methods for loading dendritic cells with tumor antigen for the induction of antitumor immunity. J. Immunother. 25: 289–303. Roychowdhury, S., K. F. May, Jr., K. S. Tzou, T. Lin, D. Bhatt, A. G. Freud, M. Guimond, A. K. Ferketich, Y. Liu, and M. A. Caligiuri. 2004. Failed adoptive immunotherapy with tumor-specific T cells: reversal with low-dose interleukin 15 but not low-dose interleukin 2. Cancer Res. 64: 8062–8067. Marzo, A. L., B. F. Kinnear, R. A. Lake, J. J. Frelinger, E. J. Collins, B. W. Robinson, and B. Scott. 2000. Tumor-specific CD4+ T cells have a major “post-licensing” role in CTL mediated anti-tumor immunity. J. Immunol. 165: 6047–6055. Soejima, Y., A. Taketomi, T. Yoshizumi, H. Uchiyama, S. Aishima, T. Terashi, M. Shimada, and Y. Maehara. 2007. Extended indication for living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation 83: 893–899. Hsu, F. J., C. Benike, F. Fagnoni, T. M. Liles, D. Czerwinski, B. Taidi, E. G. Engleman, and R. Levy. 1996. Vaccination of patients with B-cell lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 2: 52–58. Nestle, F. O., S. Alijagic, M. Gilliet, Y. Sun, S. Grabbe, R. Dummer, G. Burg, and D. Schadendorf. 1998. Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide- or tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 4: 328–332. Nestle, F. O., A. Farkas, and C. Conrad. 2005. Dendritic-cell-based therapeutic vaccination against cancer. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 17: 163–169. Pardoll, D., and J. Allison. 2004. Cancer immunotherapy: breaking the barriers to harvest the crop. Nat. Med. 10: 887–892. Rabinovich, G. A., D. Gabrilovich, and E. M. Sotomayor. 2007. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25: 267–296. Serafini, P., C. De Santo, I. Marigo, S. Cingarlini, L. Dolcetti, G. Gallina, P. Zanovello, and V. Bronte. 2004. Derangement of immune responses by myeloid suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 53: 64–72. Salvadori, S., G. Martinelli, and K. Zier. 2000. Resection of solid tumors reverses T cell defects and restores protective immunity. J. Immunol. 164: 2214–2220. Moretta, L., G. Ferlazzo, C. Bottino, M. Vitale, D. Pende, M. C. Mingari, and A. Moretta. 2006. Effector and regulatory events during natural killer-dendritic cell interactions. Immunol. Rev. 214: 219–228. Tatsumi, T., T. Takehara, T. Kanto, T. Miyagi, N. Kuzushita, Y. Sugimoto, M. Jinushi, A. Kasahara, Y. Sasaki, M. Hori, and N. Hayashi. 2001. Administration of interleukin-12 enhances the therapeutic efficacy of dendritic cell-based tumor vaccines in mouse hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 61: 7563–7567. Martı´n-Fontecha, A., L. L. Thomsen, S. Brett, C. Gerard, M. Lipp, A. Lanzavecchia, and F. Sallusto. 2004. Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat. Immunol. 5: 1260–1265. Cohen, P. A., L. Peng, G. E. Plautz, J. A. Kim, D. E. Weng, and S. Shu. 2000. CD4+ T cells in adoptive immunotherapy and the indirect mechanism of tumor rejection. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 20: 17–56. Strauss, G., W. Osen, and K. M. Debatin. 2002. Induction of apoptosis and modulation of activation and effector function in T cells by immunosuppressive drugs. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 128: 255–266. Eisele, R. M., P. Neuhaus, and G. Schumacher. 2008. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors using a novel bipolar device. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 18: 857–863. Mazzolini, G., C. Qian, X. Xie, Y. Sun, J. J. Lasarte, M. Drozdzik, and J. Prieto. 1999. Regression of colon cancer and induction of antitumor immunity by intratumoral injection of adenovirus expressing interleukin-12. Cancer Gene Ther. 6: 514–522. Mazzolini, G., J. Prieto, and I. Melero. 2003. Gene therapy of cancer with interleukin-12. Curr. Pharm. Des. 9: 1981–1991. Schultz, J., L. Heinzerling, J. Pavlovic, and K. Moelling. 2000. Induction of long-lasting cytokine effect by injection of IL-12 encoding plasmid DNA. Cancer Gene Ther. 7: 1557–1565. Jinushi, M., and H. Tahara. 2009. Cytokine gene-mediated immunotherapy: current status and future perspectives. Cancer Sci. 100: 1389–1396. Tirapu, I., M. Rodriguez-Calvillo, C. Qian, M. Duarte, C. Smerdou, B. Palencia, G. Mazzolini, J. Prieto, and I. Melero. 2002. Cytokine gene transfer into dendritic cells for cancer treatment. Curr. Gene Ther. 2: 79–89.
708
INTRATUMORAL NEOADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR HCC
61. Melero, I., M. Duarte, J. Ruiz, B. Sangro, J. Galofre´, G. Mazzolini, M. Bustos, C. Qian, and J. Prieto. 1999. Intratumoral injection of bone-marrow derived dendritic cells engineered to produce interleukin-12 induces complete regression of established murine transplantable colon adenocarcinomas. Gene Ther. 6: 1779–1784. 62. Nishioka, Y., M. Hirao, P. D. Robbins, M. T. Lotze, and H. Tahara. 1999. Induction of systemic and therapeutic antitumor immunity using intratumoral injection of dendritic cells genetically modified to express interleukin 12. Cancer Res. 59: 4035–4041. 63. Furumoto, K., S. Arii, S. Yamasaki, M. Mizumoto, A. Mori, N. Inoue, N. Isobe, and M. Imamura. 2000. Spleen-derived dendritic cells engineered to enhance interleukin-12 production elicit therapeutic antitumor immune responses. Int. J. Cancer 87: 665–672. 64. Tatsumi, T., T. Takehara, S. Yamaguchi, A. Sasakawa, T. Miyagi, M. Jinushi, R. Sakamori, K. Kohga, A. Uemura, K. Ohkawa, et al. 2007. Injection of IL-12 gene-transduced dendritic cells into mouse liver tumor lesions activates both innate and acquired immunity. Gene Ther. 14: 863–871. 65. Bontkes, H. J., D. Kramer, J. J. Ruizendaal, E. W. Kueter, V. F. van Tendeloo, C. J. Meijer, and E. Hooijberg. 2007. Dendritic cells transfected with interleukin-12 and tumor-associated antigen messenger RNA induce high avidity cytotoxic T cells. Gene Ther. 14: 366–375.
66. He, X. Z., L. Wang, and Y. Y. Zhang. 2008. An effective vaccine against colon cancer in mice: use of recombinant adenovirus interleukin-12 transduced dendritic cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 14: 532–540. 67. Rodrı´guez-Calvillo, M., M. Duarte, I. Tirapu, P. Berraondo, G. Mazzolini, C. Qian, J. Prieto, and I. Melero. 2002. Upregulation of natural killer cells functions underlies the efficacy of intratumorally injected dendritic cells engineered to produce interleukin-12. Exp. Hematol. 30: 195–204. 68. Miller, G., S. Lahrs, and R. P. Dematteo. 2003. Overexpression of interleukin-12 enables dendritic cells to activate NK cells and confer systemic antitumor immunity. FASEB J. 17: 728–730. 69. Ahuja, S. S., S. Mummidi, H. L. Malech, and S. K. Ahuja. 1998. Human dendritic cell (DC)-based anti-infective therapy: engineering DCs to secrete functional IFN-gamma and IL-12. J. Immunol. 161: 868–876. 70. Mazzolini, G., C. Alfaro, B. Sangro, E. Feijoo´, J. Ruiz, A. Benito, I. Tirapu, A. Arina, J. Sola, M. Herraiz, et al. 2005. Intratumoral injection of dendritic cells engineered to secrete interleukin-12 by recombinant adenovirus in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal carcinomas. J. Clin. Oncol. 23: 999–1010. 71. Sangro, B., G. Mazzolini, J. Ruiz, M. Herraiz, J. Quiroga, I. Herrero, A. Benito, J. Larrache, J. Pueyo, J. C. Subtil, et al. 2004. Phase I trial of intratumoral injection of an adenovirus encoding interleukin-12 for advanced digestive tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 22: 1389–1397.