IMPACT OF N FERTILIZATION ON C BALANCE AND SOIL ... - doiSerbia

Journal of Agricultural Sciences Vol. 60, No. 2, 2015 Pages 135-148

DOI: 10.2298/JAS1502135S UDC: 633.15-184;633.31/.37-184 Original scientific paper

IMPACT OF N FERTILIZATION ON C BALANCE AND SOIL QUALITY IN MAIZE-DHAINCHA CROPPING SEQUENCE Banashree Sarma, Satya Sundar Bhattacharya, Nirmali Gogoi*, Sreyashi Paul and Bhaswatee Baroowa Department of Environmental Science, Tezpur University, Napaam, Assam - 784028, India Abstract: Excess N fertilization to achieve high crop yield is a grand old practice in developing countries. However, inorganic nutrient sources considerably replenish soil organic C (SOC). In the present study, we applied six different levels of N keeping P and K constant for maize, grown under maize (Zea mays) – dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) cropping sequence. We recorded high crop yield, profuse root biomass and SOC stock with increasing N fertilization. Moreover, water holding capacity, microbial biomass carbon and particulate organic carbon improved significantly with increasing levels of N. Conversely, bulk density, mineral associated organic carbon and pH decreased with increasing application of inorganic N. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was recorded between root biomass and soil organic carbon. A study of the sensitivity index showed particulate organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon to be good indicators of nutrient management practices. Dhaincha cultivation accelerated C and N mineralization in soil, which is reflected in increased biomass and crop yield. Hence, we conclude that inorganic N fertilization rate (72 80 kg ha-1) in maizedhaincha cropping sequence successfully maintains the SOC balance and optimize N stock in soil. Key words: carbon mineralization, physico-chemical parameters, N mineralization, alluvial soil, maize. Introduction The atmospheric CO2 concentration of the Earth is increasing rapidly. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol identified that the incorporation of atmospheric CO2 into biomass and soil is highly effective in reducing CO2 build up (Lal, 2004). The main pools of actively cycling C are atmospheric CO2, biota (mostly vegetation), soil organic matter (including detritus), and the ocean. Among these C pools, soil organic matter (SOM) plays a key role in global C cycling and is important in *

Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]

136

Banashree Sarma et al.

maintaining soil fertility that sustains agricultural productivity (Lou et al., 2011). It influences crop growth and yield, either directly by supplying nutrients or indirectly by modifying chemical, physical and biological conditions of soils (Hati et al., 2007). Improvement of soil biological properties affects growth of plants and soil microbial diversity and population, thereby creating a suitable environment for root growth (Lee et al., 2009). Hence, agricultural soils can constitute either a net significant source or sink of CO2. But decaying organic matters are biologically most useful. Therefore, a dilemma exists between the two states: whether to conserve SOM or use up for profit in terms of nutrient availability (Janzen, 2006). Sequestering more SOM by suppressing decomposition will cause energy deficiency for sustaining life of soil microbial population while mineralization will lead to the depletion of SOM and the release of CO2 into the atmosphere. Therefore, effective management practice should be devised to maintain the SOC balance. Crop response to N fertilization involves a change in biomass allocation. Therefore, this can significantly affect the input of C to the soil and subsequently SOC. There are many studies related to the rates and quantity of SOC levels due to N fertilization, nevertheless, the influence depends on management, soil type and climate (Alvarez, 2005). The incorporation of cover crops in the cropping sequence is another effective agricultural management practice that provides many services to agroecosystems, like improving soil nutrient retention and physical health (Lal, 2004). Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the popular cereal crops grown throughout the globe. Being an exhaustive crop, maize requires high quantity of N for its optimum growth. Moreover in India, the higher subsidy rates on nitrogenous fertilizers artificially reduced their cost compared to P and K fertilizers. This encourages the farmers to use nitrogenous fertilizers in abundance ignoring their long-term effects on soil quality. Regarding these viewpoints, the present study was aimed at investigating the impacts of different levels of inorganic N fertilization on the changes in SOC and its fractions over a two-year period in a maize-dhaincha crop rotation. Moreover, we also analyzed the changes in soil physico-chemical properties and yield of maize. Material and Methods Experimental design and site quality The experiment was conducted at Tezpur located in north bank plain zone of Assam (26o14’N and 92o50’E), India having sandy loam type of soil. Maize (Zea mays L. cv. All rounder) was grown under irrigated conditions on experimental soil followed by dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata). The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with three replicates for two consecutive years (2012 2014). We have applied various doses of N fertilizer in this study, keeping

Impact of N fertilization on C balance and soil quality

137

other management practices such as P and K rates, plant population, sowing methods, spacing and intercultural operations and harvesting time identical as per the standard practice recommended for this zone. The treatment combination used for the study was T1 (Unfertilized); T2 (N –100 kg ha-1); T3 (N -80 kg ha-1); T4 (N – 72 kg ha-1); T5 (N – 60 kg ha-1); T6 (N – 40 kg ha-1). In all the treatments, the whole quantities of P and K along with half dose of N (urea) were applied as basal in furrows. The remaining quantity of N was applied in 2 split doses at 30 days after sowing (DAS) (knee high stage) and 70 DAS (silking stage) respectively. Soil sampling Soil samples were collected at harvest of the crops. Soil samples from each treatment consisted of three composite sub samples that were taken with a probe (6.0-cm diameter core) from the upper 0–15 cm depth. Field-moist soil samples were divided into two sub samples. One sub sample was air dried at room temperature and sieved through a 0.5-mm sieve and used for chemical analysis. The other sub sample was oven-dried at 105°C for 24 hours, sieved through 2-mm sieve and analysed for the physical parameters. Physico-chemical analysis Soil physical properties such as bulk density (BD) and water holding capacity (WHC) were analysed using standard methods by following Page et al. (1982). Soil pH was estimated in 1:2 soil-water suspension using a digital pH meter (HI96107). SOC was determined by oxidation with potassium dichromate and by titrating the excess dichromate with ferrous ammonium sulphate (Baruah and Borthakur, 1997). Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) was determined with modifications of the method described by Cambardella and Elliott (1992). Ten grams of dry soil was dispersed in 30 ml of sodium hexametaphosphate (5 g L-1) with shaking on a reciprocating shaker (90 r min-1) for 18 hours. The soil suspension was poured over a 53-mm screen. Water in the slurry was evaporated in a forced air oven at 45°C and the dried sample was ground with a mortar and pestle and analyzed for mineral associated organic C (AOC). POC content was calculated by subtracting AOC from SOC (Divito et al., 2011). Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined using CHCl3 fumigation-extraction method (Vance et al., 1987). Analysis of available N, P and K of soil was done according to the method given in Baruah and Borthakur (1997). Avaiable N was determined using alkaline potassium permanganate method in Kelplus (Model-Elite Ex VA) using NaOH, H2SO4 and methyl red as indicator. Available P was estimated by using Bray’s reagent. Available K was estimated using flame photometer. For this, 2 g of soil is extracted with neutral 1N ammonium acetate followed by analysis of K in the solution in a flame photometer.

138


Plant parameters Both above-ground and below-ground plant biomasses were recorded at regular interval. Root biomass was obtained by excavating root and then by drying the samples in an oven at 105°C for 12 hours. After drying, samples were kept in a desiccator and dry weights were taken. Maize was harvested at its physiological maturity and dhaincha was harvested 10 weeks after sowing and yield was recorded at harvest. Data handling and statistical analysis The Sensitivity Index (SI) was computed using the following formula according to Yang et al. (2012):

All data presented are the mean of two years. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows 16.0.20. All data obtained were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the randomized block design. Relationships among the variables were studied using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. LSD and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at the 5% level of probability were used to test the significance of differences between treatment means. Results and Discussion Basic soil characteristics of experimental site Table 1 shows the basic soil characteristics. The experimental soil was slightly acidic with SOC content of 1.41% with medium nutrient status (N, P and K).The soil was sandy loam with 44.4% water holding capacity and 1.1 Mg m-3 bulk density. Table 1. General characteristics of basic soil. Parameters pH Soil organic carbon (%) Particulate organic carbon (%) Mineral associated organic carbon (%) Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1soil) Available N (mg kg-1 soil) Available P (mg 100 g-1 soil) Available K (mg 100 g-1 soil) Bulk density (Mg m-3) Water holding capacity (%)

Mean + SE 6.14+0.003 1.41+0.006 0.33+0.015 1.08+0.009 0.646+0.004 123.2+0.35 1.61+0.05 12.48+0.16 1.1+0.007 44.4+0.653


139

Impact of inorganic N on SOC content of cropped soil Soil organic C content increased with increasing N levels (Figure 1). The highest SOC was recorded under T2 (1.47%) followed by T3 (1.45 %) (P=0.03) in the upper soil zones at the end of maize cultivation. This increase in SOC compared to basic soil (Table 1) can be attributed to higher biomass production and return of residue from maize plants due to N fertilization (Lee et al., 2009). The results of a positive correlation between root biomass of maize and SOC in our experiment support this finding (r=0.958). N fertilization also stimulates soil microbial activity, thereby changing the dynamics of SOC in soil (Lou et al., 2011). However, dhaincha cultivation showed a negative impact on SOC concentration. SOC decreased in T2, T3 and T5 after dhaincha cultivation while the rest of the treatments maintained the value at par with maize cultivation. Decreased SOC during cover crop cultivation can be credited to a high nutrient extraction rate by the crop without any external input of fertilizer. In our experiment, the increased substrate availability from maize cultivation leads to higher microbial activity which lowers the SOC content during dhaincha cultivation i.e. increased C mineralization. Similar results of reduction in SOC pool by cover crops grown for a short time was also reported by other researchers (Lal, 2004).The results from our experiment suggested that this cropping sequence (maize-dhaincha) maintains the C dynamics by avoiding C saturation in the soil. Thus, the soil can act as a sink of CO2 for a relatively longer period of time. The positive influence of N fertilization on SOC sequestration was also reported by other researchers (Guzman et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2009).

Soil Organic Carbon (%)

1.50

a ab

T1 ab

1.45

a ab

bc bc

c

c

T2

b bc

1.40

bc

T3 T4 T5 T6

1.35

Maize

Dhaincha

Different lower case letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the 5% level of significance according to DMRT.

Figure 1. Impact of various levels of N fertilization on SOC content.

140


Dynamics of C fractions in soil Table 2 represents the results of POC, AOC and MBC. POC, one of the good indicators of soil quality and labile fraction of SOC was found to increase significantly under N fertilization in both crops. POC content of the experimental field varies from 0.34% to 0.58% throughout the experiment. A significant increase in POC (P=0.01) was recorded due to N fertilization (T 2, T3 and T4) during maize cultivation while it decreased in T2 and T3 at harvest of dhaincha. Our results on higher residue return under N fertilization also support this statement. Similar results were also obtained by other researchers in different crops (Purakayastha et al., 2008). In this experiment, the greater tendency of increasing POC during maize cultivation was the result of production of higher below-ground biomass by maize crop than by dhaincha (Table 3). Interestingly, AOC fraction, the stabilized pool of SOC, of all the plots was found to decrease after the harvest of both crops. This might be because of disturbances in the upper soil layer due to interaction between roots and microbial community. As a result of this interaction, an increased rate of incorporation of more labile fraction of SOC, i.e. the POC, was observed (Table 2). However, the AOC content was higher than POC. But in the long run this scenario may be reversed. These results validate the importance of N fertilization for increasing residue return, but demonstrate that it is not sufficient to increase stable SOC level in the upper soil layer. Table 2. Changes in fractions of organic carbon under different levels of N fertilization. Fractions AOC (%) POC (%) MBC (mg kg-1 soil) Treatments Maize Dhaincha Maize Dhaincha Maize Dhaincha T1 1.05+0.015ab 0.98+0.029b 0.35+0.015d 0.42+0.026b 0.661+0.016a 0.549+0.021a T2 0.98+0.032b 0.98+0.009b 0.49+0.017b 0.47+0.009a 0.888+0.019b 0.683+0.003b T3 0.88+0.026c 0.96+0.012b 0.58+0.041a 0.47+0.021a 0.835+0.026b 0.646+0.013b T4 0.98+0.026b 0.96+0.009b 0.47+0.023bc 0.49+0.009a 0.720+0.010a 0.650+0.015b T5 1.03+0.019ba 1.02+0.032ab 0.40+0.028cd 0.39+0.038bc 0.720+0.022a 0.569+0.008b T6 1.07+0.015a 1.07+0.015a 0.35+0.012d 0.34+0.015c 0.665+0.020a 0.643+0.026b LSD 0.32 0.28 0.35 0.31 0.028 0.023 AOC=Mineral associated organic carbon; POC= Particulate organic carbon; MBC= Microbial biomass carbon. Different lower case letters within each column indicate significant differences between treatments at the 5% level of significance according to DMRT.

The response of MBC to N fertilization was inconsistent throughout the experiment. Such inconsistency in MBC under different levels of N fertilizer has also been reported earlier (Lou et al., 2011). However, the positive impact of N fertilization on MBC was prominent at the end of maize harvest. The highest


141

significant MBC was obtained in T2 (P=0.00). Compared to maize, dhaincha cultivation recorded lower soil MBC content in all the plots. This is due to higher root biomass (Table 3) and availability of soil N (Figure 3) for microbial utilization that provided a good substrate for microbial growth and activity. This contradicts the findings of Jia et al. (2010) while working with Larix gmelinii and Fraxinusm andshurica plantations. The reduction of MBC content can be attributed to the changes of soil nutrient properties (N, P, K and SOC) and pH (Yu et al., 2013). Table 3. Changes in root biomass (g plant-1) under different levels of N fertilization during the maize growing season. Treatm ents T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Maize Grand growth

Silking

Tasseling

0.80+0.06bc 1.72+0.13a 1.10+0.08b 0.93+0.15b 0.59+0.08cd 0.43+0.05d

3.27+0.16d 7.34+0.23a 5.47+0.09b 5.33+0.17b 4.23+0.15c 4.28+0.20c

3.95+0.08d 8.00+0.25a 5.45+0.12b 5.71+0.08b 4.64+0.12c 4.48+0.16c

Maturity

Harvest

Dhaincha Vegetative Harvest growth

5.18+0.24d 5.92+0.11d 0.10+0.004c 0.63+0.071e 9.01+0.28a 9.91+0.51a 0.13+0.003b 1.92+0.069a 7.22+0.13b 7.54+0.09b 0.14+0.006a 1.66+0.024b 7.02+0.18b 7.19+0.40bc 0.13+0.003b 1.71+0.037b 5.90+0.9c 6.52+0.08cd 0.12+0.004cb 1.47+0.032c 5.30+0.12d 6.02+0.06d 0.12+0.003cb 1.17+0.078d

LSD 0.14 0.246 0.21 0.262 0.384 0.006 0.079 Different lower case letters within each column indicate significant differences between treatments at the 5% level of significance according to DMRT.

Physical properties Soil bulk density decreased with increasing levels of N fertilizers (Figure 2a). This decrease in BD was more pronounced under maize cultivation compared to dhaincha. Nitrogen of 100 kg ha-1 (T2) recorded the highest decline in BD followed by 80 and 72 kg ha-1 (T3 and T4), respectively. BD showed a negative correlation with root biomass (r for maize=0.912; dhaincha=0.942) and SOC (r for maize=0.983; dhaincha=0.674). The reduction of BD was due to greater biomass production (Table 3) and return of residues to the soil under N fertilization. This is in agreement with the findings of Hati et al. (2007). Another reason for the reduction of BD could be due to application of more inorganic N fertilizer which increases SOC and subsequently enhances microbial and faunal activity resulting in improvement of soil porosity (Haynes and Naidu, 1998). This in turn also improved the WHC. Improved WHC was observed in T2 with higher dose of N fertilizer up to 100 kg ha-1 (Figure 2b). This rise in WHC was more prominent during maize cultivation than that of cover crop, dhaincha. More considerable increase of WHC in maize than in dhaincha can be ascribed to surface application of fertilizers which resulted in more root biomass in maize than in dhaincha. However, at the end of dhaincha

142


T1

-3

Bulk Density (Mg m )

1.4

T2

1.3

T3 1.2 a 1.1

c bc abc abc

T4

a

ab

c

bc bc abc ab

1.0 0.9

Maize

Dhaincha

a

T5 T6

Water Holding Capacity (%)

cultivation, T2 recorded the highest value of WHC while the least increase was observed in control (T1). WHC showed a positive correlation with SOC (r for maize=0.929; dhaincha=0.688). A significant increase of WHC due to application of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers was reported by Rasool et al. (2008) in maize and wheat crops. 65 a a 55

b

a a b b

c

c

ab

b b

45 35 25 Maize

Dhaincha

b


Figure 2. Impact of various levels of N fertilization on (a) bulk density, (b) water holding capacity. Changes in soil chemical properties In all the treatments, soil pH decreased with increasing doses of N fertilizer (Table 4). Treatment T2 recorded the lowest pH (6.09) while T1 and T6 maintained the highest pH (6.14) at the end of two years (P=0.00). Such decrease was significant in the fertilized plots compared to control plots. This soil acidification was found to be continued even after the harvest of dhaincha (Table 4). The stimulating effect of urea in the process of nitrification under subtropical conditions leads to soil acidification (Darilek et al., 2009).This acidifying effect of N fertilizer has already been demonstrated by other researchers (Hati et al., 2007; Guzman et al., 2006; Miglierina et al., 2000). Interestingly, the correlation data suggested an inverse relation between pH and SOC (r for maize=0.938; dhaincha=0.725). More available soil N was found with the application of higher N fertilizer while in control available N decreased over time (Figure 3). The highest accumulation of available N was observed in T2 and T3 (Figure 3) (P=0.00). Our results are in agreement with the findings of other researchers (Jagadamma et al., 2008; Miglierina et al., 2000). Similar to SOC, available N decreased during


143

dhaincha cultivation. The sluggish N uptake by maize plants during maturity resulted in accumulation of N in the upper soil layer (Peng et al., 2010). On the other hand in dhaincha, increased uptake of available N with no external application of fertilizer resulted in reduction of available soil N concentration. Nitrogen availability showed a positive correlation with SOC (r=0.974) and an inverse correlation with soil pH (r=0.971) during maize cultivation, however, this relation was weaker for dhaincha. Table 4. Changes in pH under different N levels. Treatments Maize Dhaincha T1 6.15+0.006c 6.14+0.003c T2 6.10+0.003a 6.09+0.009a T3 6.11+0.012a 6.11+0.000ab T4 6.11+0.015ab 6.10+0.003a T5 6.12+0.012ab 6.13+0.012bc T6 6.14+0.003c 6.14+0.012c LSD 0.013 0.011 Different lower case letters within each column indicate significant differences between treatments at the 5% level of significance according to DMRT.

a b bc

bb

c

d

d 10

c

e b

0

a

N

ab a

a a ab

P

Maize

K

d

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

20 Available nutrients -1 (mg 100g soil)

Available nutrients -1 (mg 100g soil)

20

c

ab ab a

bc

d 10

aa b

b

bb a

0

N

a aa aa

P Dhaincha

K


Figure 3. Impact of various levels of N fertilization on nutrient availability (N, P and K) under different crops. Availability of P and K increased in all the treatments at the end of two years (Figure 3). The highest available P was found in T 3while T1 recorded the lowest. A decreasing level of available P was noticed after the harvest of maize, i.e. during dhaincha cultivation in all the treatments except in T1. However, we observed a significant increase in available soil K content in treatment T 4 followed by T2.

144


After the harvest of maize, an increase in K content was recorded in all the treatments except in T5. Lower uptake of K by maize relative to other crops resulted in accumulation of K. Another reason of surface accumulation of K was probably due to removal of K from lower depths and decomposition of crop residue at the soil surface (Guzman et al., 2006). The observed variation in availability of both P and K under different levels of N fertilizer might be due to its effect on microbial activity and population leading to reduced availability of these nutrients. Positive responses of available P to basal application of N and P fertilizers have also been reported by Miglierina et al. (2000). High levels of N fertilization disturbed the N: P: K balance of soil. Edmeades (2003) reported that imbalanced fertilization of P and K confines the supply of these nutrients that hampers the uptake for crop growth and finally yield of maize. Plant parameters and yield Crop yield was the highest in treatment T2 followed by T3 (Table 5) and T1 recorded the lowest yield (P=0.003). Improvement in soil physical health (Figure 2a and 2b) and nutrient availability status (Figure 3) might be the cause of increased yield under higher levels of N fertilization. A highly significant positive correlation of yield was observed with SOC (r=0.889) and available N (r=0.933). However, soil pH showed a significant negative correlation with yield (r=0.986). Table 5. Maize yield under different N levels. Treatments Maize yield (q ha-1) T1 33.03+5.64b T2 48.90+3.54a T3 48.54+2.93a T4 47.06+1.41a T5 44.67+3.48a T6 36.16+2.89b LSD 3.73 Different lower case letters within each column indicate significant differences between treatments at the 5% level of significance according to DMRT.

Irrespective of treatments, an increase in root biomass was observed throughout the crop growing season (Table 3). Nitrogen fertilization had a substantial role in increasing the root biomass. This can be explained by the direct role of N fertilizer in plant growth and development and indirectly by improving the soil health. The strong positive correlation between below-ground biomass (root biomass) and available N (r for maize=0.905; dhaincha=0.641) also supports this. However, in the long run this positive influence of higher N fertilizer on


145

improvement of maize yield and biomass production will not continue. The increased N fertilization might result in higher availability of residual N in soil (Figure 3) and this subsequently will increase the risk of nitrogen loss by leaching and nitrification leading to soil acidity (Malhi and Lemke, 2007).

Sensitivity index (%)

T2

T4

T3

T5

T6

60

30

0

-30

SOC

AOC

POC

MBC

SOC

Dhaincha

AOC

POC

MBC

Maize

Figure 4. Impact of various levels of N fertilization on sensitivity indices of various C fractions. Sensitivity index of carbon fractions Fertilizer treatments and crop have a significant impact on the SI of various fractions of SOC (Figure 4). During dhaincha cultivation, lower sensitivity of SOC fractions was observed compared to maize. This is due to application of fertilizer during maize cultivation only. The fractions were more sensitive to the high fertilizer doses. The SI of POC was the highest followed by MBC. This showed that these labile fractions are more sensitive to management practices. Hence, monitoring of these fractions serves as a better way to understand the SOC dynamics in relation to management practices such as fertilizer treatments. Yan et al. (2007) also reported POC and MBC to be more sensitive indicators of SOC changes in the tested soil induced by nutrient management. Conclusion Results of the present experiment showed that SOC balance is maintained to a certain degree in maize-dhaincha cropping sequence. Increased nitrogenous fertilization of 100 kg ha-1 resulted in higher yield with improved soil C stock as well as physical health, but in the long term, this fertilization rate will stimulate soil

146


mineralization and nitrification resulting in acidification. Therefore, N fertilizer of 72 kg ha-1 would be optimum for sustainable yield of maize grown in sandy loam soils of Assam. This type of extended study will be very much helpful for optimization of regional NPK fertility program with the ideal N level to sequester more atmospheric CO2 into soil. References Alvarez, R. (2005): A review of nitrogen fertilizer and conservation tillage effects on soil organic carbon storage.Soil Use and Management 21:38-52. Baruah, T.C.,Borthakur, H.P. (1997): Soil Chemistry. In: Baruah, T.C.,Borthakur, H.P., A textbook of soil analysis.Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp.118-132. Cambardella, C.A., Elliott, E.T. (1992): Particulate soil organic matter across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56:777-783. Darilek, J.L., Huang, B., Wang, Z.G., Qi, Y.B., Zhao, Y.C., Sun, W.X., Gu, Z.Q., Shi, X.Z. (2009): Changes in soil fertility parameters and the environmental effects in a rapidly developing region of China. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 129:286-292. Divito, G.A., Rozas, H.R.S., Echeverrıi, H.E., Studdert, G.A., Wyngaard, N. (2011): Long term nitrogen fertilization: Soil property changes in an Argentinean Pampas soil under no tillage. Soil & Tillage Research 114:117-126. Edmeades, D.C. (2003): The long-term effects of manures and fertilizers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 66:165-180. Guzman, J.G., Godsey, C.B., Pierzynski, G.M., Whitney, D.A., Ray, E.,Lamond, R.E. (2006): Effects of tillage and nitrogen management on soil chemical and physical properties after 23 years of continuous sorghum. Soil & Tillage Research 91:199-206. Hati, K.M., Swarup, A., Dwivedi, A.K., Misra, A.K., Bandyopadhyay, K.K. (2007): Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 119:127-134. Haynes, R.J., Naidu, R. (1998): Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51:123-137. Jagadamma, S., Lal, R., Hoeft, R.G., Nafziger, E.D., Adee, E. (2008): Nitrogen fertilization and cropping system impacts on soil properties and their relationship to crop yield in the central Corn Belt, USA. Soil & Tillage Research 8:120-129. Janzen, H.H. (2006): Points of view: The soil carbon dilemma: Shall we hoard it or use it? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38:419-424. Jia, S., Wang, Z., Li, X., Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Liang, A. (2010): N fertilization affects on soil respiration, microbial biomass and root respiration in Larixgmelinii and Fraxinusmandshurica plantations in China. Plant and Soil 333:325-336. Lal, R. (2004): Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123:1-22. Lee, S.B., Lee, C.H., Jung, K.Y., Park, K.D., Lee, D., Kim, P.J. (2009): Changes of soil organic carbon and its fractions in relation to soil physical properties in a long-term fertilized paddy. Soil & Tillage Research 104:227-232. Lou, Y., Wang, J., Liang, W. (2011): Impacts of 22-year organic and inorganic N managements on soil organic C fractions in a maize field, northeast China. Catena 87:386-390. Malhi, S.S., Lemke, R. (2007): Tillage, crop residue and N fertilizer effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality and nitrous oxide gas emissions in a second 4-yr rotation cycle. Soil & Tillage Research 96:269-283.


147

Miglierina, A.M., Iglesias, J.O., Landriscini, M.R., Galantini, J.A., Rosell, R.A. (2000): The effects of crop rotation and fertilization on wheat productivity in the Pampean semiarid region of Argentina. 1. Soil physical and chemical properties. Soil & Tillage Research 53:129-135. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. (1982): Methods of soil analysis. Part 2.Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA. Peng, Y., Niu, J., Peng, Z., Zhang, F., Li, C. (2010): Shoot growth potential drives N uptake in maize plants and correlates with root growth in the soil. Field Crop Research 115:85-93. Purakayastha, T.J., Rudrappa, L., Singh, D., Swarup, A., Bhadraray, S. (2008): Long-term impact of fertilizers on soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in maize–wheat–cowpea cropping system. Geoderma 144:370-378. Rasool, R., Kukal, S.S., Hira, G.S. (2008): Soil organic carbon and physical properties as affected by long-term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizers in maize–wheat system. Soil & Tillage Research 101:31-36. Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C., Jenkinson, D.S. (1987): An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19:703-707. Yan, D., Wang, D., Yang, L. (2007): Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on labile organic matter fractions in a paddy soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44:93-101. Yang, X.,Ren, W., Sun, B., Zhang, S. (2012): Effects of contrasting soil management regimes on total and labile soil organic carbon fractions in a loess soil in China. Geoderma 177-178:49-56. Yu, W.T., Bi, M.L., Xu, Y.G., Zhou, H., Ma, Q., Jiang, C. (2013): Microbial biomass and community composition in a Luvisol soil as influenced by long-term land use and fertilization. Catena 107:89-95.

Received: July 22, 2014 Accepted: January 13, 2015

148


UTICAJ ĐUBRENJA AZOTOM NA RAVNOTEŢU UGLJENIKA I KVALITET ZEMLJIŠTA U PLODOREDU KUKURUZA I SEZBANIJE Banashree Sarma, Satya Sundar Bhattacharya, Nirmali Gogoi*, Sreyashi Paul i Bhaswatee Baroowa Odsek za ekološke nauke, Univerzitet u Tezpuru, Napam, Asam - 784028, Indija Rezime U zemljama u razvoju, prekomerno đubrenje azotom, u cilju postizanja visokih prinosa, predstavlja uobičajenu, staru praksu. Međutim, mineralna hraniva u značajnoj meri doprinose nadoknađivanju organskog ugljenika u zemljištu (SOC). U ovom istraţivanju primenili smo šest različitih doza azota, uz primenu istih količina fosfora i kalijuma u gajenju kukuruza (Zea mays) i sezbanije (Sesbania aculeata) u plodoredu. Utvrdili smo visok prinos useva, veliku količinu mase korena i povećanje rezerva SOC, sa povećanjem doze primenjenog azota. Zatim, sa povećanjem doze azota značajno se poboljšavao kapacitet za drţanje vode, mikrobna biomasa ugljenika i sadrţaj organskog ugljenika. Nasuprot tome, sa povećanjem doze mineralnog azota sniţavala se pH vrednost zemljišta, specifična zapremina i organski ugljenik povezan sa mineralima. Dalje, utvrđena je značajna pozitivna korelacija između mase korena i sadrţaja organskog ugljenika u zemljištu. Organski ugljenik i mikrobna biomasa ugljenika mogu biti dobri indikatori primene hraniva u praksi. Gajenje sezbanije (Sesbania aculeate) pospešuje mineralizaciju azota i ugljenika u zemljištu, što se odraţava na povećanje biomase i prinosa. Prema tome, zaključujemo da primena mineralnog azota u dozi 72-80 kg ha-1, u plodoredu kukuruza i sezbanije, uspešno odrţava bilans SOC i omogućava optimizaciju rezerve azota u zemljištu. Ključne reči: mineralizacija ugljenika, fizičko-hemijski parametri, mineralizacija azota, aluvijalno zemljište, kukuruz.

Primljeno: 22. jula 2014. Odobreno: 13. januara 2015.

*

Autor za kontakt: e-mail: [email protected]