Inhibition of Voriconazole Metabolism by Chloramphenicol in an ...

13 downloads 0 Views 218KB Size Report
Jun 19, 2008 - Inhibition of Voriconazole Metabolism by Chloramphenicol in an. Adolescent with Central Nervous System Aspergillosis. Verena Hafner,1§ ...
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Nov. 2008, p. 4172–4174 0066-4804/08/$08.00⫹0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00805-08 Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Vol. 52, No. 11

Inhibition of Voriconazole Metabolism by Chloramphenicol in an Adolescent with Central Nervous System Aspergillosis䌤 Verena Hafner,1§ Nadine Albermann,2§ Walter E. Haefeli,1* and Friedrich Ebinger3 Department of Internal Medicine VI, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany1; Department of Pediatrics, Neonatology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 153, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany2; and Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Neurology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 153, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany3 Received 19 June 2008/Returned for modification 31 July 2008/Accepted 7 September 2008

For an adolescent with bacterial meningitis and subsequent cerebral aspergillosis, intravenous voriconazole dose requirements substantially decreased during coadministration with intravenous chloramphenicol and considerably rose after discontinuation of the antibiotic. In agreement with in vitro evidence, these data suggest that chloramphenicol is a rather significant inhibitor of hepatic CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C19. day) and voriconazole was started on day 30 (the dosages are shown in Fig. 1). Until day 51, the magnetic resonance scans showed a stable disease under antimycotic treatment, but thereafter, cerebral aspergillosis proceeded irresistibly, and the patient died on day 82. Voriconazole plasma and ventricular trough concentrations were determined using a fully validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay (12). The assay was calibrated for the range of 0.2 to 10.0 ␮g/ml, with a lower limit of detection of 0.2 ␮g/ml. During chloramphenicol/voriconazole treatment, voriconazole plasma trough concentrations ranged between 2.2 and 3.5 ␮g/ml and the ratios between maintenance dose and trough concentration (13) (used as a proxy for drug clearance when the volume of distribution is not altered and kinetics are roughly linear) were between 103 and 164 ml/min. After discontinuation of chloramphenicol, voriconazole concentrations considerably dropped and antifungal doses had to be almost doubled (to two maintenance doses of 9 mg/kg of body weight/day) to keep the voriconazole concentrations in a range considered effective against Aspergillus infection (16). At that time, the ratios of maintenance dose and trough concentration were 333 (day 54) and 380 ml/min (day 65). In all ventricular fluid samples, voriconazole could be quantified, and the antifungal concentrations were 36 to 97% (average, 60%) of the corresponding plasma concentrations (Fig. 1). The patient was genotyped for CYP2C19 polymorphisms, and ⴱ2 and ⴱ3 alleles were absent, suggesting an extensive metabolizer status. In children, voriconazole clearance is higher than that in adults, and kinetics are linear (10, 19, 20). As an adolescent, our patient may have already shown some nonlinearity, because concentrations increased slightly more than expected when voriconazole doses were increased. Evaluation of changes of comedication during the observation period revealed no reason for the changes in voriconazole kinetics other than changes in chloramphenicol: ranitidine (two 150-mg doses/day), which does not modify voriconazole pharmacokinetics (11), was replaced by omeprazole, which increases voriconazole peak concentrations by 15% and overall exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) by 41% (21). Hence, the observed decreases in voriconazole concentration were not caused by this modification but, if anything, were attenuated by it. Caspo-

Chloramphenicol is a potent broad-spectrum antibiotic for the treatment of serious bacterial infections, including meningitis (2). Drug interactions have not been studied extensively, despite substantial in vitro evidence suggesting that chloramphenicol is a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 (9). Voriconazole, a triazole broad-spectrum antifungal for systemic treatment of invasive aspergillosis (4, 17), is metabolized by these enzymes and to a small extent by CYP2C9 (5). A 14-year-old Caucasian boy (64 kg) was admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit with fulminant pneumococcal meningitis and septic shock (the day of admission was defined as day 1). The initial computed-tomography scan showed a severe brain edema that required installation of intracranial pressure monitoring and repeated insertion of external ventricular drainages (EVDs) in both lateral ventricles. During antibiotic therapy, the clinical and laboratory signs of infection resolved, but after initial recovery, meningitis relapsed on day 15. The patient was diagnosed with sphenoid sinusitis, and sphenoidotomy was performed on days 15 and 21. He was treated with intravenous cefotaxime (days 1 to 9), piperacillintazobactam (days 8 to 13), meropenem (days 13 to 21), clindamycin (days 13 to 21), and penicillin (days 22 to 32) and intravenous (days 22 to 43) and intrathecal (days 26 to 31) vancomycin. On day 29, the patient’s status worsened, with disorientation, vomiting, and fever. A magnetic resonance scan revealed a brain abscess in the left frontal lobe, with signs of ventriculitis, and antibiotic therapy was switched to intravenous chloramphenicol (four 1-g doses/day) and ceftriaxone (one 2-g dose/day) treatment. On the same day, Aspergillus fumigatus was detected in one removed EVD and both ventricular fluid and blood tested positive for aspergillus antigen. Disseminated fungal ventriculitis was assumed, and antimycotic therapy with intravenous caspofungin (one 50-mg dose/

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Internal Medicine VI, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 49 6221 56 8740. Fax: 49 6221 56 4642. E-mail: [email protected]. § Both authors contributed equally to this work. 䌤 Published ahead of print on 15 September 2008. 4172

VOL. 52, 2008

NOTES

4173

FIG. 1. Time course of voriconazole concentrations in plasma and cerebral ventricular fluid during and after chloramphenicol coadministration. Ventricular fluid was collected from EVDs of the left and the right ventricles.

fungin was started on the same day as voriconazole, and the two drugs were coadministered during the whole observation period. However, the combination of voriconazole and caspofungin is a well-established therapy for invasive aspergillosis (15) and is not known to decrease voriconazole concentrations, although this has not been studied in a well-controlled fashion. The only other modification was the discontinuation of intravenous chloramphenicol on day 37, which was initiated 1 day prior to the start of voriconazole treatment due to treatmentresistant ventriculitis and signs of ependymitis. The next voriconazole sample was drawn 6 days thereafter, when chloramphenicol was likely completely eliminated and CYP inhibition by chloramphenicol was expected to have resolved. Other drugs concurrently administered at unchanged doses throughout the observation period were amlodipine, atenolol, vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and miconazole, all of which were not expected to interact or were even known not to interact with voriconazole. The considerable changes observed were therefore indicative of a markedly reduced hepatic activity of CYP2C19 and/or CYP3A4 in the early days of voriconazole treatment. In animals, chloramphenicol may act as an inhibitor of CYPs in vitro (1) and in vivo (3, 22). In a human in vitro cell system, chloramphenicol inhibited CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and (weakly) CYP2D6 (9). In patients, the plasma concentrations and toxicity of the CYP3A4 substrate tacrolimus profoundly increased during chloramphenicol treatment (7, 14, 18). Likely through inhibition of CYP2C19, chloramphenicol inhibited S-mephenytoin 4-hydroxylation in vitro (9), which may explain the increase of phenytoin reported for patients treated with both drugs (6, 8). For voriconazole, no drug interaction with chloramphenicol has been described, but the observed clearance changes of voriconazole during coadministration of chloramphenicol to an extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19 suggest that chloramphenicol is a rather significant inhibitor of hepatic CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C19. Therefore, whenever chloramphenicol is added to or withdrawn from patients on voriconazole or on other

substrates of these CYPs, close monitoring of the effects on coadministered drugs appears advisable. The Department of Internal Medicine VI, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, has received a grant from Pfizer, New York, NY. None of the authors has financial or personal relationships that could potentially be perceived as influencing the research described herein. REFERENCES 1. Ciaccio, P. J., D. B. Duignan, and J. R. Halpert. 1987. Selective inactivation by chloramphenicol of the major phenobarbital-inducible isozymes of dog liver cytochrome P-450. Drug Metab. Dispos. 15:852–856. 2. Falagas, M. E., and P. Kopterides. 2007. Old antibiotics for infections in critically ill patients. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 13:592–597. 3. Halpert, J., C. Balfour, N. E. Miller, E. T. Morgan, D. Dunbar, and L. S. Kaminsky. 1985. Isozyme selectivity of the inhibition of rat liver cytochromes P-450 by chloramphenicol in vivo. Mol. Pharmacol. 28:290–296. 4. Herbrecht, R., D. W. Denning, T. F. Patterson, J. E. Bennett, R. E. Greene, J. W. Oestmann, W. V. Kern, K. A. Marr, P. Ribaud, O. Lortholary, R. Sylvester, R. H. Rubin, J. R. Wingard, P. Stark, C. Durand, D. Caillot, E. Thiel, P. H. Chandrasekar, M. R. Hodges, H. T. Schlamm, P. F. Troke, and B. de Pauw. 2002. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 347:408–415. 5. Hyland, R., B. C. Jones, and D. A. Smith. 2003. Identification of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the N-oxidation of voriconazole. Drug Metab. Dispos. 31:540–547. 6. Koup, J. R., M. Gibaldi, P. McNamara, D. M. Hilligoss, W. A. Colburn, and E. Bruck. 1978. Interaction of chloramphenicol with phenytoin and phenobarbital. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 24:571–575. 7. Mathis, A. S., N. Shah, G. T. Knipp, and G. S. Friedman. 2002. Interaction of chloramphenicol and the calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant recipients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 4:169–174. 8. Ogutu, B. R., C. R. Newton, S. N. Muchohi, G. O. Otieno, and G. O. Kokwaro. 2002. Phenytoin pharmacokinetics and clinical effects in African children following fosphenytoin and chloramphenicol coadministration. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 54:635–642. 9. Park, J. Y., K. A. Kim, and S. L. Kim. 2003. Chloramphenicol is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isoforms CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3464–3469. 10. Pasqualotto, A. C., M. Shah, R. Wynn, and D. W. Denning. 2008. Voriconazole plasma monitoring. Arch. Dis. Child. 93:578–581. 11. Purkins, L., N. Wood, D. Kleinermans, and D. Nichols. 2003. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists have no clinically significant effect on the steadystate pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 56:51–55. 12. Rengelshausen, J., M. Banfield, K.-D. Riedel, J. Burhenne, J. Weiss, T. Thomsen, I. Walter-Sack, W. E. Haefeli, and G. Mikus. 2005. Opposite effects of short-term and long-term St John’s wort intake on voriconazole pharmacokinetics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 78:25–33. 13. Rivory, L. P., H. Qin, S. J. Clarke, J. Eris, G. Duggin, E. Ray, R. J. Trent, and

4174

14. 15.

16. 17.

NOTES

J. F. Bishop. 2000. Frequency of cytochrome P450 3A4 variant genotype in transplant population and lack of association with cyclosporin clearance. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 56:395–398. Schulman, S. L., L. M. Shaw, K. Jabs, M. B. Leonard, and K. L. Brayman. 1998. Interaction between tacrolimus and chloramphenicol in a renal transplant recipient. Transplantation 65:1397–1398. Singh, N., A. P. Limaye, G. Forrest, N. Safdar, P. Mun ˜ oz, K. Pursell, S. Houston, F. Rosso, J. G. Montoya, P. Patton, R. Del Busto, J. M. Aguado, R. A. Fisher, G. B. Klintmalm, R. Miller, M. M. Wagener, R. E. Lewis, D. P. Kontoyiannis, and S. Husain. 2006. Combination of voriconazole and caspofungin as primary therapy for invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Transplantation 81:320–326. Smith, J., N. Safdar, V. Knasinski, W. Simmons, S. M. Bhavnani, P. G. Ambrose, and D. Andes. 2006. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1570–1572. Stiefel, M., T. Reiss, M. S. Staege, J. Rengelshausen, J. Burhenne, A. Wawer, and J. L. Foell. 2005. Successful treatment with voriconazole of aspergillus brain abscess in a boy with medulloblastoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 49:203–207.

ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. 18. Taber, D. J., R. E. Dupuis, K. D. Hollar, A. L. Strzalka, and M. W. Johnson. 2000. Drug-drug interaction between chloramphenicol and tacrolimus in a liver transplant recipient. Transplant. Proc. 32:660–662. 19. Walsh, T. J., I. Lutsar, T. Driscoll, B. Dupont, M. Roden, P. Ghahramani, M. Hodges, A. H. Groll, and J. R. Perfect. 2002. Voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis, scedosporiosis and other invasive fungal infections in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 21:240–248. 20. Walsh, T. J., M. O. Karlsson, T. Driscoll, A. G. Arguedas, P. Adamson, X. Saez-Llorens, A. J. Vora, A. C. Arrieta, J. Blumer, I. Lutsar, P. Milligan, and N. Wood. 2004. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous voriconazole in children after single- or multiple-dose administration. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2166–2172. 21. Wood, N., K. Tan, L. Purkins, G. Layton, J. Hamlin, D. Kleinermans, and D. Nichols. 2003. Effect of omeprazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 56:56–61. 22. Yacobi, A., C. M. Lai, and G. Levy. 1984. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of acute interaction between warfarin enantiomers and chloramphenicol in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 231:80–84.