4 Mar 2001 ... Based on the book. LTE and the Evolution to 4G Wireless ... LTE is just one of five
major new wireless technology developments. • 3GPP LTE.
Introduction to LTE
B Based d on th the b book k LTE and the Evolution to 4G Wireless
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
1
LTE = Long g Term Evolution = 4G 1. LTE is now the worldwide standard for cellular systems 2. LTE is a scalable and flexible system y 3. LTE accommodates FDD and TDD architectures 4. LTE is based on a new “all IP” core network backhaul 5. LTE basestations ((eNodeB)) are nodes on an IP network 6. LTE is co-located with existing 2G/3G cell systems 7. LTE can use Diversity, MIMO, Beamforming 8. LTE can deliver ~300 Mbps/cell sector (Release 8) 9. LTE has a broadcast variant 10. LTE core network uses IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) 11. LTE supports IPV6 addressing, multiple IP context/UE
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
2
LTE (4G) in context of new systems • LTE is just one of five major new wireless technology developments • • • • •
3GPP LTE 3GPP HSPA+ 3GPP Edge Evolution 3GPP2 UMB* (similar to 802.20) IEEE WiMAX WiMAX** – (802.16e (802 16e / WiBRO)
• All five systems share very similar goals in terms of spectral efficiency (bits/second/Hz), with the wider systems providing the highest single user data rates • Spectral efficiency is primarily achieved through use of advanced modulation schemes and/or multi-antenna technology, ranging from basic Tx/Rx diversity, MIMO, and beamforming • HSPA+ and Edge Evolution are extensions to existing cellular systems (WCDMA and GSM) • LTE, UMB and WiMAX are new OFDMA systems with no technical precedent other than WiFi and WiBRO * While UMB is still a documented standard, it is no longer under active development ** WiMAX was deployed in several systems worldwide, but is now in rapid decline
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
3
3GPP UMTS standards evolution (RAN)
1999
2010
Release Functional Freeze
Main feature of Release
Rel-99
March 2000
UMTS 3.84 Mcps (W-CDMA FDD & TDD)
Rel-4
March 2001
1.28 Mcps p TDD ((aka TD-SCDMA))
Rel-5
June 2002
HSDPA
Rel-6
March 2005
HSUPA (E-DCH)
R l7 Rel-7
D 2007 Dec
HSPA+ (64QAM DL DL, MIMO MIMO, 16QAM UL) UL). LTE & SAE Feasibility Study
Rel-8
Dec 2008
LTE Work item – OFDMA air interface SAE Work item,, New IP core network Edge Evolution, more HSPA+
Rel-9
TBD
UMTS and LTE minor changes, LTEAdvanced feasibility study
Rel-10
TBD
LTE-Advanced (4G) work item
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
4
Wireless evolution 1990 - 2012
Increasing efficiency, bandwidth and da ata rates
2G
IS-95A cdma
IS-136 TDMA
GSM
PDC
802.11b 802.11a
2.5G
IS-95B cdma
3G
IS-95C cdma2000
3.5G
3.9G
1xEV-DO Release 0
HSCSD
GPRS
E-GPRS EDGE 1xEV-DO Release A
UMB
LTE Rel-8 LTEAdvanced Rel-9/10
4G
iMode
W-CDMA FDD
1xEV-DO Release B Edge Ed Evolution
802.11g 802.11h
W-CDMA TDD
TD-SCDMA LCR-TDD
HSDPA FDD & TDD
HSUPA FDD & TDD
802.16d Fixed WiMAXTM
HSPA+
802.16e 802 16e Mobile WiMAXTM
WiBRO
802.11n
802.16m ?
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
5
LTE Major features The motivation behind LTE • Much untapped potential in HSDPA + HSUPA (HSPA+) • But some LTE requirements can’t be met by HSPA+ • LTE goal is to provide further benefits • Spectrum Flexibility (scalable carrier channel bandwidth) • Higher Peak Data Rates with wider 20 MHz channel bandwidth • OFDMA enables less complex implementation of Advanced Antennas/MIMO Technology • OFDMA better suited for Broadcast Services
• But UE terminals will have to carry y the legacy g y of GSM/GPRS,, C2K/EVDO, WCDMA/HSPA+ which increases overall complexity of LTE deployment
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
6
LTE at a Glance Nov 2004 LTE/SAE High level requirements Reduced cost per bit More lower cost services with better user experience Flexible use of new and existing frequency bands
Spectral Efficiency
1.4
2-3x HSUPA (uplink)
3 5
Latency
10
Idle active < 100 ms
15 20
Small packets < 5 ms
SPEED!
Simplified lower cost network with open interfaces Reduced terminal complexity and reasonable power consumption
MHz
3-4x HSDPA (downlink)
Downlink D li k peak kd data t rates t (64QAM) Antenna config Peak data rate Mbps
SISO
2x2 MIMO
4x4 MIMO
100
172.8
326.4
Uplink peak data rates (Single antenna)
MIMO
Multiple Input Multiple Output
Modulation QPSK
16 QAM
64 QAM
Peak data rate Mbps
57 6 57.6
86 4 86.4
50
Mobility
Optimized: 0–15 km/h High performance: 15120 km/h Functional: 120–350 km/h U d consideration: Under id ti 350–500 km/h
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
7
UE categories • In order to scale the development of equipment, UE categories have been defined to limit certain parameters • The most significant parameter is the supported data rates: UE Category
Max downlink Number of DL Max uplink Support for uplink data rate Mbps transmit data streams data rate Mbps 64QAM
1
10.296
1
5.18
No
2
51.024
2
25.456
No
3
102.048
2
51.024
No
4
150.752
2
51.024
No
5
302.752
4
75.376
Yes
The UE category must be the same for downlink and uplink
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
8
LTE vs. HSPA+ Attribute
HSPA+ (Rel-8)
LTE targets
Peak Data Rate / 5 MHz sector in ideal radio conditions
DL – 42 Mbps UL – 10 Mbps
DL – 43.2 Mbps UL – 21.6 Mbps
Peak Data Rate / 20 MHz sector in ideal radio conditions, 2x2 DL
DL – 84 Mbps (10 MHz) UL – 20 Mbps (10 MHz)
DL – 172.8 172 8 Mbps (20 MHz) UL – 86.4 Mbps (20 MHz)
Cell Edge improvement compared to HSPA Release 6 Spectral Efficiency (real world)
Evolved HSPA & LTE - DL – 3x to 4x; UL – 2x to 3x All solutions will benefit from ongoing improvements to the radio interface such as UE RX diversity, equalization, interference cancellation; MIMO, higher order modulation etc.
Latency: End to End Ping Delay
40 ms
L t Latency: Idle Idl to t Active A ti
Currently C tl around d 600 600ms Goal to reduce to 100 ms
200 users @ 5MHz
Spectral efficiency
>400 users for larger BW Essentially on par par, comparisons cited often are based on dissimilar conditions and can be misleading
Access Technology: Downlink (DL) Uplink (UL)
Frequency Band Bit-rate/Site:
MIMO:
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
10
System Architecture Evolution (SAE) • Today’s core network is a hybrid of elements representing 20+ years evolution of telecommunications • The evolution and availability of the internet is transforming the way people look at the core network • SAE is a project to develop a much flatter, higher performance and cheaper packet-only core network with gateways to legacy networks and non-3GPP technologies • SAE is separate from but closely coupled to LTE • Some of LTE’s LTE s goals - like latency targets - will not be met until the evolved packet core network is implemented
Page 11
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
11
3GPP Release 5 core network UTRAN – 3G radio
GPRS packet routing
Gm (To P-CSFC) Uu
AMR
Node B
ATM2u/5c
Uu
IP
AMR
Stand alone LMU
RNC BG
Iur ATM5
Iub
associated LMU
Node B
Gp
Gr
Stand alone LMU
Lg
CBE
EIR
CBC
Broadcast services
Lc Lg
from EDGE phones
LCS client
HSS
Sh
MSC
Agprs
Si
PCU
Agprs Abis
HR, FR, EFR
ISUP/BICC
server Mc
Um LMU(b)
Nc
BSC Lb
GERAN – 2G/3G radio
SMLC
A (Ater) MGW G HR, FR, EFR
Nb
Dx
voice mail
SIP server
ISC
OSA SCS OSA API OSA app server
ISC
Mb
Mw
MRFC
Mr
Mp
? Mr
S-CSCF call server
Mg
Mi
Mb
MRFC
ISC
Mn
Other PSTN network
IM-SSF
IMS - IP Multimedia Services
IP
HR, FR, EFR or AMR or PCM over ATM or QoSIP
SIP server
Sh
HSS
Sh
IP
Enterprise PSTN
MGW
ISC
home network IMS
Si Sig GW
server
BGCF
Cx Cx
OSA app server
BGCF
Mk
SLF
OSA API
MGW
Mj
Dx
S-CSCF call server
OSA SCS
MGCF
GMSC
Mc
I-CSCF call server
Mp
MRFP
I-CSCF call server
ISC
C
B VLR
Abis
SLF
Sh
Enterprise
Mw
P-CSCF call server
Cx Cx
SMSC
BTS
BTS
Go
(from handset)
D
Gm (To P-CSFC)
DHCP
PDN
Gm
Gc
IP SCP (gsm (gsm SCF) SRF)
LMU(b)
RADIUS
GGSN
F
Um
LMU(a)
Le
Application & Content Providers
content
IP
Lh
GMLC
DNS
Gi
MMSC
Gs
IuBC
LMU(a)
AAA
Call Control IP & operator specific services
Node B
ISP
BG
Gf
associated LMU
apps
Gp
IP
Gn GTP
Gb
e-mail
GTP
GTP
SGSN IuCS
Iub
GGSN
Gp
IuPS
SMLC
RNC
ATM2u/5c
Gm (To P-CSFC) Uu
GTP
ATM2u5c
Gm (To P-CSFC)
Other GPRS PLMN
SMLC
Iub
associated LMU
Stand alone LMU
Operator ISP
OLO
PCM
Packet-switched voice
The point here is the complexity!
Roaming partners
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
12
Simplified LTE network elements and interfaces
MME = Mobile Management M entity S1
S1 S1
S1
X2
X2
SAE = System Architecture Evolution
3GPP TS 36.300 Figure 4: Overall Architecture
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
13
LTE uses an asymetric DL/UL physical layer • OFDM – Orthogonal Frequency Division Modulation for the downlink. • SC-FDMA – Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access for the uplink. • Asymetric physical layer is common in many cellular systems, due to bounds of basestations being stationary and multiuser, while mobiles can be moving and disassociated from other mobiles.
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
14
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing • OFDM already widely used in non-cellular technologies only recently usable in cellular due to improved processing power • OFDM advantages • The use of multiple subcarriers means the channel bandwidth is scalable as well as supporting frequency selective scheduling within the channel • Wide channels are possible which support higher data rates • Almost Al t completely l t l resistant i t t tto multi-path lti th due d tto very long l symbols b l • The frequency domain representation of the signal make equalizer design and MIMO implementation easier then in CDMA systems
• OFDM disadvantages • • • •
Sensitive to frequency errors and phase noise due to close subcarrier spacing Sensitive to Doppler shift which creates interference between subcarriers Pure OFDM creates high PAR which is why SC-FDMA is used on UL More complex than CDMA for handling inter-cell interference at cell edge
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
15
OFDM – Review of Basic Concepts • Slower symbol rate x multiple carriers = similar bits/sec/Hz p to: •Less susceptible - single freq. interference - multipath dropouts - impulse noise
...
...
• Carrier spacing creates orthogonality. • Phase noise, timing and frequency offsets decrease orthogonality. orthogonality
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
16
Orthogonal Basis Functions • Can C U Use C Codes d or S Subcarriers b i • Both are Orthogonal (Separable) Over A Time Interval y • Similar In Theory • Different in RF Behavior, Design Optimization • Very Different in RF Analysis
CDMA: CDMA Dividing Capacity by Code
OFDM: OFDM Dividing Capacity by Carrier
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
17
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing 5 MHz Bandwidth
FFT
gem vlu44L G 41
.eu4in scTG 4w uh 1 gafm yh 1
… Frequency
… nLr 25.892 Figure 1: Frequency-Time Representation of an OFDM Signal
OFDM is a digital multi-carrier modulation scheme, which uses a large number of closely-spaced orthogonal sub-carriers. Each sub-carrier is modulated with a conventional modulation scheme (such as QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM) at a low symbol rate similar to conventional single-carrier modulation schemes in the same bandwidth. © Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
18
Orthogonal Multiplexing •Multiple Multiple carriers may be spaced at multiples of FP and be mutually orthogonal, i.e. they do not interfere with one another. The zeros of one pulse occurs exactly on the peaks of the other carriers.
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0
2
4
6 Freqeuncy (f/Fp)
8
10
12
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
19
Orthogonal Multiplexing •Using U i aL Large N Number b off S Such hC Carriers i Yi Yields ld an OFDM Si Signall
x t
K
j 2 n
K
x t a
n K
n
n K
n
e
t TP
0 t Tp
1 0.8 06 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4
-15
-10
-5
0 Freqeuncy (f/Fp)
5
10
15
OFDM Operates as a Number of Orthogonal (Non-Interfering) Narrowband Systems © Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
20
OFDMA How do I add Access (user channels) to this system? 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 02 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4
-15
-10
-5
0 Freqeuncy (f/Fp)
5
10
15
Assigned sub-carriers for user 1 Assigned sub-carriers for user 2 © Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
21
LTE Downlink Mapping P-SS - Primary Synchronization Signal S-SS - Secondary Synchronization Signal PBCH - Physical Broadcast Channel PDCCH -Physical Downlink Control Channel PDSCH - Physical Downlink Shared Channel
16QAM
64QAM
QPSK
Reference Signal – (Pilot)
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
22
Pilot Carriers – the Needed Reference for Both Amplitude and Phase •A Portion of the Carriers are Not Modulated and Provide Amplitude and Phase References for the Nearby Modulated Channels. These must be spaced close enough for interpolation to provide valid references to the active sub-carriers.
1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0 4 -0.4
-15
-10
-5
0 Freqeuncy (f/Fp)
5
10
15
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
23
Single Carrier FDMA: The new LTE uplink transmission scheme • SC-FDMA is a new concept in transmission and it is important to understand how it works • When a new concept comes along no single explanation will work for everyone • To help put SC-FDMA in context we will use six i diff differentt ways off explaining l i i what h t SCFDMA is all about • In summary: SC-FDMA is a hybrid transmission scheme combining the low peak to average (PAR) of single carrier schemes with the frequency allocation flexibility and multipath protection provided by OFDMA
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
24
Comparing OFDMA and SC-FDMA p using g M=4 subcarriers QPSK example Q
-1,1
1, 1
1,1
-1,-1
1, -1
-1,-1
1, 1
1, -1
-1, 1
Sequence of QPSK data symbols to be transmitted
I -1,-1
-1, 1
1,-1
QPSK modulating data symbols V
V
CP
fc
Frequency
CP
60 kHz
Frequency
15 kHz
OFDMA
SC-FDMA
Data symbols occupy 15 kHz for one OFDMA symbol period
Data symbols occupy M*15 kHz for 1/M SC-FDMA symbol periods
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
25
Comparing OFDMA and SC-FDMA PAR and constellation analysis at different BW
V
V
CP
fc
CP
Frequency
60 kHz
Frequency 15 kHz
Transmission scheme Analysis bandwidth
OFDMA 15 kHz
Peak to average power Same as data symbol ratio (PAR) Observable IQ Same as data symbol at 66.7 μs rate constellation
SC-FDMA Signal BW (M x 15 kHz)
15 kHz
Signal BW (M x 15 kHz)
High PAR (Gaussian)
< data symbol (not meaningful)
Same as data symbol
Not meaningful (Gaussian)
< data symbol (not meaningful)
. Same as data symbol at M X 66.7 µs rate
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
26
Multi-antenna Technologies
• Overview of Multi-antenna techniques q • LTE Terminology • How MIMO works in LTE
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
27
Multi-Antenna Techniques in LTE • Just because there is more than one antenna, doesn’t mean it’s MIMO • Diversity can usefully be combined with MIMO Spatial Multiplexing to improve performance • A focus on the need to provide an increased DL data rate leads to an asymmetric y system y in LTE
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
28
System & Antenna Configurations, Terms “Input” and “Output” Refer to the Channel
SISO
MISO Tx0
Tx
Rx
Rx Tx1
Tx Diversity, Diversity Beamforming SIMO T Tx
Rx Diversity
MIMO R 0 Rx0
Tx0
R 0 Rx0
Rx1
Tx1
Rx1
Spatial Multiplexing
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
29
Terminology I Spatial Multiplexing
The process of transmitting data from multiple antennas on the same frequency at the same time
Transmit Diversity
Transmission of common data, but modified in some y, on more than one antenna way,
Channel
The entire route, from transmission to reception, including all the analog & RF circuits & antennas, that could introduce unwanted coupling or distortion
(Channel) Rank
The number of useable data stream (layers) in a multi-antenna radio system
Correlation
A measure of the similarity between different signals (after the receiver antennas)
Condition Number
A short term measure of the increase in SNR needed to recover a spatially multiplexed signal
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
30
MIMO Spatial Multiplexing and Diversity Both Important, Different Objectives Multiple Antennas can be used in a variety of ways: • Beamforming B f i • Transmit Diversity • Receive Diversity
Diversity techniques protect against fading, and improve coverage
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
31
Double Diversity does not make MIMO Transmit Diversity + Receive Diversity = Spatial Multiplexing MISO plus MRC Tx0 Tx1 Data modified and repeated on second symbol (or subcarrier)
Tx0
Rx0
Tx1
Rx1
MIMO Tx0 Tx1 Data only transmitted once
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
32
MIMO Operation in LTE In the Downlink Downlink, it’s normally like WLAN, the MIMO transmission is sent to a single mobile. Known as Single User MIMO
•In the Uplink, two mobiles are used together to create the MIMO signal. signal •Known as Multi-User MIMO
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
33
Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing Processes in LTE
The diagram allows for several techniques. To distinguish between SM and others, ask: “How many receive antennas do I need?”
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
34
Terminology II Codeword
The input data after basic adaptation from the payload
(Transmission) Layer
With spatial multiplexing, it is synonymous with a stream
Precoding
process of cross coupling p g the signals g before The p transmission (used in closed loop operation) to equalize the demodulated performance of the layers
Codebook
The look-up table of cross coupling factors used for precoding; shared by the mobile and base-station base station
Closed Loop MIMO
A mechanism used to continuously adapt the transmitted signal to suit the channel characteristics, using the precoder
Beamforming
The process of cross coupling the signals at transmitter (or receiver) to adapt to the channel. LTE precoding is one example of doing this
Beamsteering
When beamforming with phased array array, it is the process of tracking the movement of the mobile
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
35
From Codewords to Layers
SISO SU-MIMO(4 antennas) or Diversity (with Alamouti) May/may not be
Diversity
Single User ((or MU)) MIMO
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
36
2 (or 4) Layer Transmit Diversity Paired symbols, frequency based Alamouti technique Space Frequency Block Coding
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
37
Combined Spatial Multiplexing & Diversity The specification allows for this:
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
38
So Tell (or Remind) Me - How does MIMO work? 1: Consider a moment in time time, at a single frequency, frequency and model the channel as a box with fixed components inside: A
If we add two completely different signals at A and B, they’ll get mixed together, but in a precisely defined way, dependant on the values of Z1- Z4
B
MIMO is used uncouple signals on twisted p pairs
2: Send a training signal first, that’s unique to A and to B. Measure what comes out and therefore how they got coupled. [If you know how yg get coupled, p yyou can work out how to uncouple p them]] they 3: Everything going into the box will be coupled the same way, so you apply what you found to the real data you want to sent
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
39
… and when does it not work? Noise & interference always y limit the modulation we use. With MIMO,, there is an ADDITIONAL factor – how well can you uncouple the signals – measured by the Condition Number of the channel matrix A
Extreme example: If all the Z’s Z s are the same same, both outputs are the same. This is a “keyhole” channel, which does not support spatial multiplexing (rank =1) B
For every dB increase in condition diti number, b you may need a dB increase in the SNR
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
40
The Famous Hand-waving Demo Matrix Condition Number – shows the higher g SNR needed for MIMO Condition Number vs Cross Coupling
PER vs MIMO Condition Number 25
100 Condition Number (0dB)
20
PER %
15
10
10
1
5
0.1 0 -25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0
5
10
15
Condition Number (dB)
In Phas e Cros s Coupling (dB)
Page 41
As condition number increases, higher SNR for the same performance (EVM)
Agilent is required Restricted
Condition Number as a function of symmetric, in-phase coupling
PER vs. Condition Number (example)
How to get a real feel for it! UE eNB
•10 MHz Freq ref. •Time sync •Option phase lock
•10 MHz Freq ref. •Time sync y
• Frame Trigger
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
41
Performance Changes with Frequency and Time Condition number & Frequency q y response p 10 MHz [[Pedestrian A]]
0 dB
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
42
LTE Channel Training Signals • The Reference Signals are what allow the receiver to calculate the channel h l coefficients. ffi i t They Th NEVER overlap l b before f th they are ttransmitted itt d
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
l0
l6 l0
l6
Resource element (k,l)
R0
R0
R0
R0
R1
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
l0
R0
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 0
l0
R2
R1
R3
R2
R1 l6 l0
even-numbered slots
R3
R2 l6
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 1
R3
R2
R1
R1 l6
l6
R1
R1
R0 l6 l0
even-numbered slots
l6 l0
R1
R0
Reference symbols on this antenna port
R1
R1
R0
R0
l0
l6
Not used for transmission on this antenna port
R1
R1
l6 l0
R0
R1
R1
R0
l0
R1
R1
l 0
R3 l6 l0
even-numbered slots
l6
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 2
l0
l6 l0
even-numbered slots
l6
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 3
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
43
What makes a good channel for MIMO? • A perfect MIMO channel:
T0 T1
Channel H
h00
h11
R0
1
0
R1
0
1
• By simple observation it follows that R0 = T0 and R1 = T1 • This is a case that creates double the capacity
But suppose we create a simple static channel like this:
Channel H 0.8 0.2
How do we know if it will provide capacity gain?
0.3 -0.9
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
44
The MIMO challenge: Recovering the signal • If all four paths are the same the original signal cannot be recovered since R0 = R1 h00 T0
R0
R0 = T0 + T1 and R1 = T0 + T1 T1
h11
R1
Channel H 1
1
1
1
• But put in a phase inversion e.g. on ch3 we get: Channel H
R0 = T0 + T1 and R1 = T1 – T0 thus T0 = (R0 - R1)/2 and T1 = (R0 + R1)/2
1
1
-1
1
• The original signal is completely recovered even though the apparently unwanted ch2 and ch3 exist
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
45
The MIMO challenge: Recovering the signal • So S iis th the earlier li example l good d or b bad d ffor MIMO? R0 = 0.8 T0 + 0.3 T1
Channel H
R1 = 0.2 0 2 T0 - 0.9 0 9 T1
0.8 0.2
Giving:
0.3 -0.9
T0 = 1.15 R0 + 0.39 R1 T1 = 0.26 R0 - 1.03 R1 • We can recover the original signal • In fact any H matrix other than the unity matrix can be resolved PROVIDED there is no external or internal noise!
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
46
Why Precode (cross couple) the SM signal?
No precoding – the layer performance is unbalanced
Precoded with 1,1,-1,1 – similar performance for both layers
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
47
Precoding Matrix Index definition 3GPP TS 36.211 Table 6.3.4.2.3-1 Deals with FDD case Only 3 choices for spatial multiplexing (16 for the 4 layer case) For single data stream t transmission, i i th precoding the di produces beamsteering (with 4 antennas) Subband PMI reporting can be configured down to the resource block level
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
48
Why Apply Cyclic Delay Diversity? Top: No CDD Bottom: Large CDD Test signal with cross coupled static channel 500ns delay, -2dB in one path Condition Number shows this, and the impact on EVM Spectrum
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
49
Cyclic Delay Diversity, CDD • Works out to be a very long delay (~33us) ( 33us) • There are only two choices, Off or “Large”
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
50
Antenna influence on performance • The dynamic condition number example did not isolate effects from different components, including the antenna • In real life life, the instantaneous channel matrix H is made up from the interaction of three components: • The static 3D antenna pattern of the transmitter • The dynamic multipath and Doppler characteristics of the radio channel • The static 3D antenna pattern of the receiver
• The overall antenna contribution is the product of the transmit and receive antennas known as the channel correlation matrix
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
51
Computing the instantaneous channel The complex instantaneous channel coefficients are obtained by applying each path of the desired fading profile to each channel of the correlation matrix h00
T0 T1
h01
h11 h00
h00
R0 h11
h10
R1
h10 h01 h11
The received signals and condition number are dynamic in both the time and frequency domains according to the chosen h ffading di profile fil © Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
52
Real life performance
Variation due to instantaneous correlation Variation in the frequency domain not shown Most macrocell activity takes place in this region Variation due to fading and variable interference
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
53
Multi-antenna operation in the Uplink • Multi-User – two UEs controlled by the eNB to act like a combined transmitter • Currently more theoretical than practical – of research interest
This demonstration with g g generators allows signal the introduction of the kinds of timing and power errors that the receiver will have to cope with
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
54
Summary MIMO Spatial Multiplexing is a powerful additional transmission scheme in the right conditions The list of 7 modes for DL transmission highlights how the ENB and UE will have to work together to choose which multi-antenna technique to use:
LTE has seven different downlink transmission modes: 1.Single-antenna 1 Single antenna port; port 0 2.Transmit diversity 3.Open-loop spatial multiplexing 4.Closed-loop 4.Closed loop spatial multiplexing 5.Multi-user MIMO 6.Closed-loop Rank=1 precoding 7.Single-antenna port; port 5
SISO MISO MIMO - no precoding MIMO - with precoding MIMO - separate UE (for UL) MISO - beamsteering MISO - beamsteering
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
55
The End
© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2012
56