Inventing Entrepreneurs

19 downloads 104 Views 2MB Size Report
Inventing. Entrepreneurs. Prof. Gerry George. Imperial College London ... Invention of Vitamin D. •. Prof. .... Trying to get the most money on each deal. •. There is ...
Inventing Entrepreneurs Prof. Gerry George Imperial College London

Simple facts

Scientists becoming entrepreneurs is not the smartest choice

TTOs, at their very best, aren’t equipped to champion technologies by themselves

There is a lack of entrepreneurial capacity that can understand and push technologies

Creating tensions! Universities (and their stakeholders) becoming increasingly demanding TTOs ill-equipped to handle startups and licensing because they require two different types of talent, structure…and incentives

The application of university science requires new managerial talent to push forward 3

Imperial Innovations Working with inventors you need to apply an institutionalized process….. Stage 01 Sourcing ideas Market application

Stage 02 IP Protection

Stage 03 Proof of Concept Product Development

Stage 04 Licensing

Stage 05 Formation and incubation of technology businesses

Stage 06 Investment

Stage 07 Exits

Page 4

The Challenges of Technology Transfer •

Technology getting out there • •



Being used! Creating value

The difficult choices are in • Finding the market – what is best use? • Appropriating value – how much? • Rights – who gets it?

Page 5

Now which market?

Biocidal Polymer Cell Membrane

O

O

O

O

O

O

O O

O O



P O

O

O

O P

O

NH P

NH O

O

O O

O O

O

O O



Page 6

Where to look?

• • • • •

Biocidal polymer Low concentration requirement High efficacy (kills everything; incl human cells) Can be modified for stability Can be modified for substrate specificity

Page 7

Complicated enough?

• • •

• •

Market (application) Industry (competition) Value (capturing and sharing)

License? Start-up?

Page 8

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation



Founded in 1924



Invention of Vitamin D •

Prof. Harry Steenbock (Biochemistry) • •

Using $900 from 9 alumni of UW University should not participate in private benefit of public good

Page 9

Steenbock’s guidance



Support excellence in research • •



Attract and retain high caliber scientific talent •



Willingly and without encumbrances Discourage complacency and encourage action

Incentives to invent

Invest in the infrastructure • • •

In people In assistance In facilities

Page 10

Pushing the Core



Patenting and licensing •

Performance is stellar with licensing of 2 inventions • •



How did these two inventions become stellar? What did WARF do to make these two runaway successes?

Non-core capabilities

Page 11

Exogenous Regulatory Events

Average time decreases

Variability decreases Page 12

Claims increase

Portfolio increases

Page 13

Graphic inferences



Reduction of variance in time to patent • •

Becoming better at a single core capability Inferring learning within core capability

Mean 1244 days 771 days 750 days

Variability 587 days 347 days 314 days

Difference (t-test) p