Inversion problem for singular integral operators: C ... - Europe PMC

6 downloads 0 Views 376KB Size Report
of singular integral operators, in particular for Wiener-Hopf operators in several ... The general C*-theory (5) defines their unique extensions pj 21/3j -Map[2j, ...
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 75, No. 10, pp. 4668-4670, October 1978

Mathematics

Inversion problem for singular integral operators: C*-approach (C*-algebras/Fredholm theories/Mihlin-Calderon-Zygmund operators/Wiener-Hopf operators/Folland-Stein operators)

ALEXANDER DYNINt School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540

Communicated by I. M. Singer, July 5, 1978

Note that the C*-algebra of a solvable Lie group could not be solvable because a solvable C*-algebra is always a postliminary algebra (1). The spectrum 2fA of a solvable C*-algebra .1 has the following properties: (iv) The E2j are topologically imbedded in .1 A. (V) 5.[A = U 2j (vi) Closure of 2j is u 2k (k > j). Symbols and Fredholm hierarchy Choose *-isomorphisms

ABSTRACT The inversion problem is solved for a wide class of singular integral operators, in particular for Wiener-Hopf operators in several variables, Mihlin-Calderon-Zygmund operators on bounded domains, and Folland-Stein operators on compact nondegenerate Cauchy-Riemann manifolds.

Introduction The inversion problem for a bounded linear operator A on a Hilbert space H is twofold: how (i) to recognize that A is invertible and (ii) to construct its inverse. The problem is regular for Riesz-Shauder operators 1 + T with T e @L(H), the algebra of compact operators on H. A regularization of the inversion problem for arbitrary A means its reduction to some regular cases. The inversion problem for A as an element of L(H), the C*-algebra of all bounded linear operators on H, is equivalent to the inversion problem for A as an element of any C*-algebra 21 which contains A and identity. Solvable C*-algebras are chosen. In this framework it is possible to derive a hierarchy of Fredholm properties. I postpone a relevant Index theory for future publications. Solvable C*-algebras A separable C*-algebra is defined to be solvable if there exists a finite filtration 21

Pj Zj +I/ 3j -Co[1j, IL(Hj)], 0 < j < N. The general C*-theory (5) defines their unique extensions

3j -Map[ 2j, _L(Hj)] pj 21/be the mapping of factorization. Then the 7rj i- 5.1/sj j-symbol aj on 21 is defined to be Let

j7rj: .1 Map[1j, L((Hj)], 0 < j < N. PROPOSITION. Ker oj = Sj and for every A e 51, the evaluation mapping of aj(A) aj

=

ev(oj)(A): Ij X Hi - Hi, ev(aj)(A)(t, u) = uj(A)(t)(u), is continuous.

Note that the general C*-theory (cf. ref. 1) implies that all are C*-ideals even in 51. 2i The immediate examples of solvable C*-algebras are commutative C*-algebras (their length is 0), C*-algebras with symbol of Breuer and Cordes (2) (their length is 1), and

Remark: In terms of ref. 4, rj(A) for A e 51 are continuous families of operators on Ij (cf. ref. 5). Note that in all examples below, j-symbols of operators are even continuous with respect to the operator norm in L(Hj). Suppose now that 51 contains a unit 1. Then element A of 51 is defined to be j-Fredholm if it is invertible modulo Sj. Therefore, A is j-Fredholm if and only if its j-symbol aj(A) is a continuous family of invertible operators. The set Fredj(2.) of j-Fredholm operators is open in .1 and stable urnder !aj-perturbations. Note that Fredj(51) c Fredk(5.) for j < k and Fredo(21) is the group of invertible elements of 21. An element B is defined to be a j-parametrix for A if B is an inverse of A modulo !j. We have Uj(A)uj(B) = oj(B)aj(A) = 1 on 2j, Uj-1(A )j-l(B) = 1 -T, aj l(B)uj_(A) = 1 -T on Ij-1, where T' and T" are compact families of operators on Xj-j (the latter means local compactness of their evaluation mappings). In terms of ref. 4 (cf. ref. 5) the ji-I(A) is the Fredholm family of operators on 1j. In this case we can construct its index in Kc(2j-i) (cf. ref. 6) and define j-index of A as indj(A) = ind[aj-1(A)].

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

tors.

C = ° C 3 C ..*CN+1. =

such that for every j with 0 < j < N. (i) %j is a closed self-adjoint ideal in + (ii) !3j+ 1/% is C*-isomorphic with a C*-algebra Co[Ij, @L (H;)] of all continuous mappings of a locally compact space EJ to the C*-algebra of compact linear bounded operators on a complex Hilbert space Hi. (iii) Let d; = dim Hi. Then di > d +1 The minimal possible N is called the length of W and denoted

Gohberg-Krupnik (3) C*-algebras generated by singular integral operators on singular curves (their length can be arbitrary). Other examples can be provided by tensoring of solvable C*-algebras and by PROPOSITION. Let 51, and 52 be solvable C*-subalgebras in a C*-algebra such that the C*-ideals [Wh, 2] generated by commutators of elements from 51h and 2 are solvable C*algebras. Then the C*-algebra generated by 51, and 212 is solvable as well.

Abbreviation: MCZ-operators, Mihlin-Calderon-Zygmund

opera-

t Present address: Department of Mathematics, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794.

4668

Mathematics: Dynin

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75 (1978)

Regularization of the inversion problem I suggest the following algorithm of step-by-step regularization for the inversion problem. Suppose that A is an invertible element of 2[. We have dN < o because of 1 E 21. Therefore, 'N(A) is an invertible continuous family of (dN X dN)-matrices on 2N. Let lrN-l be a continuous section of the factorization TrN. Take BN = WrN IPN1[UN(A)'1]. Then BN is an N-parametrix for A. Suppose that we already have a (j + 1)-parametrix Bj+ 1 for A. Then Kercrj(Bj+i) = Ker[oj(A)aj(Bj +)] = Ker(I -T),

Keroj(Bj+l)* = Ker[aj(A)*aj(Bj+1)*] = Ker(l -T), where Tj and T belong to Co[Ej, l 2L (Hj)]. Therefore, by solution of the Riesz-Shauder equations we can construct two continuous finite rank projector families P1 and Qj from Co[42, _Ls(H1)] such that oj(Bj+ 1) defines a 1 - 1 mapping from Ker P1 onto Ker Qp. Moreover, indj(Bj+ 1) + indj(A) = ind( -T'); hence, indj(Bj+ 1) = 0. Therefore, we can construct a vector bundle isomorphism Lj Im Pj Im Qj and define a continuous finite rank operator family Fj = [L - j(Bj+ 1)]Pp Now the aj(Bj+ 1) + F1 is a continuous invertible operator o

family on 2j and T; = aj(A)[aj(Bj+1) + Fj] -1 e Co[ 1,e2L(Hj)] We see that 1 - Tj is an invertible Riesz-Shauder operator family from Co[ l1,2L(H)]. Choose a continuous section -rj1 of the canonic mapping 21 ?I/S. Then the element of ?1

gr

Bj = Bj+ i1[j-1[ -pi(T-Mis a j-parametrix of A. Take j = N-1, N -2,. 1. Then Bo = A-1. Actually we have the following PROPOSITION. The regularization above is possible if and only if A is an invertible operator.

Wiener-Hopf operators in several variables (cf. ref. 7) Consider Wiener-Hopf operators on H = L2(Rn ), where R+ =(R+)n,

Au(x) = au(x) + 3' b(x - y)u(y)dy, u e H, where a = constant and b(x) e L l(Rn). Take the C*-algebra (n) generated with Wiener-Hopf operators in _L(H). PROPOSITION. The C*-algebra J(n) is solvable with length nand dj = o for j < n, dn = 1. For j < n, 2y can be realized as the disjoint union of (7) coordinate subspaces RJ of Rn, J c 1, nJ, card(J) = j. Then aj(A) is the (n-Di)-valued function. Indeed, if {' E RJ, x" e R 'J, then for v e L2(RCJ)

aj(A)(Q')v(x") = av(x") +

RCJ b(, y"

-X")V(Y" )dy"

4669

where

bA~t'x

)=

(2)n,- J b(x', x")e-ix'T'dx'.

En can be realized as Rn u

arn(A)() = a

+

o

and

(2) 3' b(x)e-ixtdx, t e Rn

Mihlin-Calderon-Zygmund operators (MCZ-operators)

on manifolds with boundaries (cf. ref. 8) Let X be a Riemannian compact C'-manifold with boundary bX. Take H = L2(X). Consider the C*-algebra E9Yx generated in L(H) by singular integral MCZ-operators. The Mihlin symbol of a MCZ-operator A we denote u(A). This is a C'function on the manifold with boundary S(X) of all unit tangent vectors of X. PROPOSITION. The C*-algebra Ex is solvable of length 2 with do = di = o= D2 = 1. We have 20 = point, Ho = H, o - Id. 11 = S(bX), H1 = L2(R+). if A is a MCZ-operator, then for r e S(bX) the a1(A)(r) is the Wiener-Hopf operator with symbol a(A)(r + sv), where v is the inward unit normal and s e R. 2 = S(X) u N, (bX), where N(bX) = Isv: IsI < 11 is the manifold of normal vectors to boundary with length < 1. H2 = C and for a MCZ-operator A we have

U2(A)|S(X) = o(A), o2(A)(sv) (s2 + 1)o(v) +~~~2 (s - 1)a(-v).

Singular integral operators on contact manifolds In ref. 9 I have defined a class of pseudo-differential operators on contact manifolds. It embraces the Folland-Stein singular integral operators on nondegenerate Cauchy-Riemann manifolds (10). Let M be a compact contact oriented smooth manifold of dimension 2n + 1, n > 0. Let C(M) be the 2n-bundle of contact tangent vectors on M, and let E(M) be the dual bundle of T(M)/C(M). We denote by Ee(M) the bundle of unit vectors in this bundle (with respect to some Riemannian metric on M). Let H = L2(M). Consider the C*-algebra (CM generated in L(H) by the zero order pseudo-differential operators of ref. 9. The (o)-symbol defined for them in ref. 11 can be extended on all CM; for every A e £M the u(A) is a continuous Ee(M)-family of singular integral operators of the type discussed in ref. 12 with phasespaces Cm(M), m e M. PROPOSITION. The CM is a solvable C*-algebra of length 2 withdo=di = co,d2= 1.

Moreover, 10 = point, Ho = H, io = Id. 1= Ee(M), H1 = L2(Rn), a, = a. -2 = S(M), H2 = C, a2 is the restriction of the principal symbol of A (9) on S(M), the manifold of unit cotangent vectors of M. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCS77-18723.

4670

Mathematics: Dynin

1. Dixmier, J. (1964) Les C*-algebres et leurs Representations (Gauthier-Villars, Paris). 2. Breuer, M. & Cordes, H. 0. (1974) J. Math. Mech. 13, 313324. 3. Gohberg, I. & Krupnik, N. Ja. (1972) in Hilbert Space Operator Algebras, Colloquia on Mathematics, ed. Sz-Nagy, B. (NorthHolland, Amsterdam), Vol. 5, pp. 239-264. 4. Dolganova, S. (1972) Uspekhi 27,211-212 (in Russian). 5. Hormander, L. (1970) Matematika 14, 78-97 (in Russian). 6. Segal, G. (1970) Q. J. Math., Ser. 2, 21, 385-402.

Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 75 (1978) 7. Douglas, R. G. & Howe, R. (1971) Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 158, 203-217. 8. Boutet de Monvel, L. (1970) Acta Math. 126, 11-51. 9. Dynin, A. (1975) Sov. Math. (Engi. Transi.) 16, 1608-1612. 10. Folland, G. B. & Stein, E. M. (1974) Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 27,429-522. 11. Dynin, A. (1976) Sov. Math. (Engi. Transl.) 17,508-512. 12. Grossman, A., Toupias, G. & Stein, E. M. (1969) Annu. Inst. Fourier 18, 343-368.