Ion Association and Solvation Behavior of Some Lithium Salts in ...

3 downloads 0 Views 357KB Size Report
Abstract. Accurate measurements of electrical conductivities and laser Raman spectra of solutions of lithium chloride (LiCl), lithium bromide (LiBr), lithium ...
J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955 DOI 10.1007/s10953-008-9288-9

Ion Association and Solvation Behavior of Some Lithium Salts in Tetrahydrofuran. A Conductivity and Raman Spectroscopic Study Debashis Das

Received: 10 November 2007 / Accepted: 20 January 2008 / Published online: 29 April 2008 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Abstract Accurate measurements of electrical conductivities and laser Raman spectra of solutions of lithium chloride (LiCl), lithium bromide (LiBr), lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4 ) and lithium perchlorate (LiClO4 ) in tetrahydrofuran are reported. The conductivity data have been analyzed by the Fuoss-Krauss theory, yielding values for the ion-pair and triple-ion formation constants. The Raman spectra suggest the presence of a new signal of perchlorate ClO− 4 ions in solution, whereas there is no such evidence for the other investigated anions. The observed processes have been interpreted by an Eigen multistep mechanism. For each salt, the predominant portion is found to remain in the form of ion pairs, leaving only a small fraction of triple ions. Keywords Electrical conductance · FT-Raman spectra · Lithium electrolytes · Tetrahydrofuran

1 Introduction Lithium has been studied for many years as an anode material for non-aqueous solution batteries [1]. In such systems, the choice of electrolyte solution and optimization of its salt concentration are two important factors. An electrolyte possessing high specific conductivity, and hence with minimal ion-ion interactions, is required to maintain low internal resistance in the cell. Knowledge of the state of association of the electrolytes and their interactions with the solvent molecules is essential for making an optimal choice of solvent and electrolyte in such systems. To this end a classical method, namely electrical conductivity, has been used to study the status of ion association and solvation in electrolyte solutions. Such studies are complemented with structural studies of the metal ion solvates using Raman spectroscopy. Hopefully, this will provide a molecular rationale for the choice of an electrolyte for battery construction. D. Das () Department of Chemistry, Dinhata College, Dinhata, 736135 Cooch-Behar, West Bengal, India e-mail: [email protected]

948

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

Recently, a comprehensive program [2–6] was initiated to study lithium ion solvation in different non-aqueous solvents using conductometric and Raman spectroscopic measurements. The study has now been extended to tetrahydrofuran (THF), a particularly relevant solvent for battery construction using lithium electrodes. Here we have investigated the solution behavior of four lithium salts, e.g., lithium chloride (LiCl), lithium bromide (LiBr), lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF4 ) and lithium perchlorate (LiClO4 ) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) using Raman spectroscopic and conductometric techniques, in an effort to provide a picture of the effect of these anions on ion complexation in this medium.

2 Experimental Section 2.1 Chemicals Tetrahydrofuran (Merck, India) was kept over KOH for several days, refluxed for 24 h and then distilled over LiAlH4 . The measured density and viscosity of the purified solvent at 298.15 K, 0.882 g·cm−3 and 0.463 mPa·S [6, 7], respectively, agree well with the literature values. The salts were of Fluka’s purum or puriss grade. Lithium chloride, lithium bromide and lithium tetrafluoroborate were dried under vacuum at 50–60 °C for 48 h and were then used without further purification. Lithium perchlorate was recrystallized three times from conductivity water and then dried under vacuum for 2–3 days [8]. 2.2 Apparatus and Procedure Conductivity measurements were carried out with a Systronics conductivity meter using a dip-type cell of cell constant 1.14 cm−1 with an precision of 0.1%. Measurements were made in a thermostatic bath maintained within ±0.005 K of the desired temperature. The details of the experimental procedure were described earlier [9]. The viscosity and density of the solvent were measured by means of a suspended-level Ubbelohde viscometer [10] and an Ostwald-Sprengel type pycnometer of about 25 mL capacity, respectively. Several independent solutions were prepared and runs were performed to ensure the reproducibility of the results [11]. Due correction was made for the specific conductivity of the solvent. The laser Raman spectroscopic measurements were made with a DILOR Z24 spectrometer using the 480 nm excitation frequency. The spectral slit width was kept at 4 cm−1 . The laser power used was 300 mW. The spectra were recorded by the Regional Sophisticated Instrumentation Centre, Indian Institute of Technology at Madras. All spectra were scanned at least twice to ensure repeatability. To avoid moisture pickup, all solutions were prepared in a dehumidified room with utmost care. The relative permittivity (ε = 7.58 at 298.15 K) of tetrahydrofuran was obtained from the literature [12].

3 Results and Discussion 3.1 Conductance The equivalent conductivity () data as a function of the molar concentration (c) are listed in Table 1 for LiCl, LiBr and LiClO4 solutions in tetrahydrofuran. When values of log10  are

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

949

Table 1 Equivalent (molar) conductivities and corresponding molarities of the lithium salts in tetrahydrofuran at 298.15 K LiCl c × 104 /

mol·dm−3

LiBr

LiClO4

c × 104 /

/ S·cm2 ·mol−1

c × 104 /

/

mol·dm−3

S·cm2 ·mol−1

mol·dm−3

/ S·cm2 ·mol−1

70.8

0.0050

115.5

0.1999

79.4

0.8450

80.4

0.0042

133.2

0.1900

89.1

0.8125

96.5

0.0040

154.0

0.1826

100.0

0.7857

125.9

0.0038

177.8

0.1805

112.2

0.7614

160.8

0.0037

205.3

0.1795

125.9

0.7434

214.4

0.0036

237.1

0.1796

141.2

0.7205

260.8

0.0036

273.8

0.1809

158.5

0.7037

348.4

0.0036

316.2

0.1833

177.8

0.6895

482.4

0.0038

365.2

0.1871

199.5

0.6805

616.4

0.0040

421.7

0.1924

245.2

0.6633

696.8

0.0041

486.9

0.1933

316.2

0.6600

803.9

0.0042

562.3

0.2080

354.8

0.6604

910.9

0.0044

649.4

0.2188

446.7

0.6805

1071.9

0.0046

749.9

0.2320

588.8

0.7283

1258.9

0.0049

1000.0

0.2679

741.3

0.7850

1548.8

0.0053

1333.5

0.3219

891.2

0.8626

1812.3

0.0057

1778.3

0.4083

1000.0

0.9036

2021.6

0.0062

2053.5

0.4602

1122.0

0.9894

2514.4

0.0066

2440.6

0.5612

1258.9

1.0753

3015.5

0.0075

3162.3

0.8100

1479.1

1.2712

plotted as a function of log10 c for these electrolytes, a minimum was observed in each case and then the conductivity again increased, indicating the formation of triple ions (Fig. 1) [13–15]. The conductivity data have been analyzed by the Fuoss-Krauss triple-ion theory [16] in the form   0 T0 KT  1/2 c, (1) {g(c)}c = 1/2 + 1/2 1 − 0 KP KP 

g(c) = β =

1/2 ) exp(− 2.303β 1/2 (c) 0

(1 −

S 1/2 )(1 −  )1/2 3/2 (c) 0 0

,

1.8247 × 106 , (εT )3/2

S = α0 + β =

0.8206 × 106 82.501 0 + . 3/2 (εT ) η0 (εT )1/2

(2)

(3) (4)

In the above equations β  is the Debye-Hückel activity coefficient and S is the limiting Onsager slope coefficient of the conductivity equation,  = 0 − S(c/0 )1/2 , and the other terms have their usual significance. 0 and T0 are the limiting equivalent conductivities of

950

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

Fig. 1 Electrical conductivities (as log10 ) as a function of concentration (as log10 c) for: (a) LiCl, (b) LiBr, and (c) LiClO4 in tetrahydrofuran

+ LiX and of two possible triple ions, LiX− 2 and Li2 X , and KP and KT are their ion-pair and triple-ion formation constants, respectively. The symmetrical approximation that the two possible formation constants for triple ions are equal to each other has been accepted.

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

951

Fig. 2 Values of c1/2 /(S·cm2 ·mol−1/2 ·dm−3/2 ) as a function of concentration (c/mol·dm−3 ) for: (a) LiCl, (b) LiBr, and (c) LiClO4 in tetrahydrofuran

Neglecting /0 compared to 1, and assuming for interionic attraction that g(c) = 1 [15] in Eq. 1, we get c1/2 =

0 1/2 KP

+ T0

KT 1/2

KP

c.

(5)

For the present data, it was found that Eq. 5 was inadequate, with the data showing a downward curvature when plotted as c1/2 versus c (Fig. 2). On the contrary, Eq. 1 gives reasonably straight lines and the curvature has almost disappeared.

952

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

Table 2 Conductivity parameters of lithium salts in tetrahydrofuran at 298.15 K Electrolyte

0

S·cm2 ·mol−1

KP

mol−1 ·dm3

KT

r2

mol−1 ·dm3

103 cP

104 cT

mol·dm3

mol·dm3 0.2

LiCl

137.7

2.49 ×1011

59.91

0.9989

301.4

LiBr

138.8

1.09 ×108

50.03

0.9997

313.6

8.5

LiBF4

122.6

1.13 ×107

44.36

0.9944

37.9

3.1

LiClO4

140.8

6.58 ×106

24.87

0.9998

146.1

5.5

To apply Eq. 1, it is necessary to have estimates of 0 and to assume a value of T0 . Internal consistency, however, requires comparison of relative values of K T for the same electrolyte in different solvents [15]. This has been the limiting criterion used here in letting T0 = 20 /3 and using the average Walden product values of (0 η0 ) at 298.15 K for LiCl, LiBr, and LiClO4 in methanol, acetonitrile, pyridine and dimethylformamide from the literature [17] and for THF η0 = 0.463 mPa·s at 298.15 K. The 0 values are found to be 137.7, 138.8, and 140.8 and the calculated S values from Eq. 4 are 86.11 × 105 , 86.79 × 105 and 88.04 × 105 , both respectively, for LiCl, LiBr, and LiClO4 . Table 2 reports the 0 , K P and KT values for these salts, as well as those of the square of the correlation coefficients (r 2 ). Also included in this table are the corresponding 0 , KP , KT and r 2 values for LiBF4 taken from an earlier study [6]. The uncertainty in the values of KT is within ±1 to ±3 in each case. The values are also comparable to those found earlier for some lithium salts in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran [13, 14], 1,2-dimethoxyethane [15] and dimethoxymethane [18]. The concentrations of the ion pairs and the triple ions (cP and cT , respectively) at the highest concentration for each electrolyte have been calculated using the following relations: cP = c (1 − α − 3αT ) , −1/2

, α = (KP cP )   1/2 αT = KT /KP c1/2 ,   1/2 cT = KT /KP c3/2 .

(6) (7) (8) (9)

Their values are also included in Table 2. 3.2 Raman Spectra The Raman spectra of pure tetrahydrofuran and of some representative salt solutions, in the wave number range of 4000 to 100 cm−1 , are presented in Figs. 3 and 4. The observed principal bands are listed in Table 3. Partial band assignments for the pure solvent as well as the electrolyte solutions have been made and are discussed accordingly. From Fig. 3, it is seen that THF exhibits its C-O stretching frequency at 922.8 cm−1 . The asymmetric C-H stretching mode of the solvent appears in the wave number range 3000 to 2800 cm−1 . These are the two major regions in the Raman spectra of tetrahydrofuran. No appreciable shifts of these Raman bands were observed in the salt solutions investigated here. This observation is similar to those found in the Raman spectra of 1,2dimethoxyethane [4]. The spectra indicate that the cation is associated with the anion in an intimate way in the form of contact ion pairs in THF solutions [19], but another possibility

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

953

Table 3 Raman frequencies in cm−1a THF

LiCl

LiBr

LiClO4

LiBF4



466.1 (w)

464.1 (w)

465.7 (w)

543.5 (w)

922.8

923.6 (w)

922.8 (s)

920.3 (s)

924.5 (s)







939.1 (m)



2873.1 (s)

2874.2 (s)

2875.1 (s)

2877.3 (s)

2878.1 (s)

2912.7 (s)

2910.1 (s)

2914.2 (s)

2912.5 (s)

2915.1 (s)

2928.4 (s)

2927.8 (s)

2926.9 (s)

2928.0 (s)

2928.2 (s)

2963.6 (s)

2964.5 (s)

2963.4 (s)

2963.0 (s)

2966.1 (s)

a s = strong, m = medium, w = weak

Fig. 3 Raman spectrum of pure tetrahydrofuran

is that the cation might have some solvent molecules in its near-neighbor environment based on geometrical considerations [15]. Besides this band, the spectra of the salt solutions do not show any new signals with the exception of the LiClO4 solution that exhibits a peak of medium intensity at 939.1 cm−1 . This new non-degenerate band is attributed to the infrared forbidden, totally symmetric, stretching vibration of the perchlorate ion [20, 21]. This new ClO− 4 signal in tetrahydrofuran solutions has been assigned to the solvent-separated ion-pair Li+ · THF·ClO− 4 and/or to − + the solvent-separated dimer Li+ ·THF·ClO− · · ·Li ·THF·ClO , which are spectroscopically 4 4 indistinguishable from each other. Thus, for LiClO4 , both contact and solvent-separated ion pairs may exist in tetrahydrofuran solution. This observation may be interpreted in terms of

954

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

Fig. 4 Raman spectrum of LiClO4 in tetrahydrofuran

the following Eigen multistep mechanism: − − + + Li+ + ClO− 4  Li ·THF·ClO4  Li ·ClO4 ,

(10)

− − + + 2Li+ ·THF·ClO− 4  Li ·THF·ClO4 · · · Li ·THF·ClO4 ,

(11)

+

2Li

·ClO− 4

 (Li

+

·ClO− 4 )2 .

(12)

The other three salts, namely, LiCl, LiBr, and LiBF4 , are found to remain essentially in the form of contact ion pairs, no solvent-separated ion pair being detectable, and the relevant equilibrium are: Li+ + B−  Li+ ·B− , +



+



2Li ·B  (Li ·B )2 ,

(13) (14)

where B = Cl− , Br− , or BF− 4 . The concentration of contact ion pairs and hence of contact quadruplets should increase with increasing KP values for the electrolyte solutions.

4 Conclusion It may thus be concluded that all of the electrolytes investigated in the present study, namely + LiCl, LiBr, LiBF4 , and LiClO4 , form symmetrical triple ions, LiX− 2 and Li2 X , in tetrahydrofuran solutions, along with ion pairs. In addition, a predominant proportion of each of these electrolytes would exist in the form of ion pairs along with quadrupoles of the innersphere type. LiClO4 , on the other hand, is found to exist in tetrahydrofuran solutions as solvent-separated ion pairs and/or solvent-separated dimers.

J Solution Chem (2008) 37: 947–955

955

Acknowledgements The author is thankful to the University Grants Commission (Eastern Regional Office, Kolkata) for sanctioning a Minor Research Project via letter No. PSW/085(05-06), 21st March 2006.

References 1. Christie, A.M., Vincent, C.A.: Conductivities of some selected lithium salt complexes in propylene carbonate. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 4618–4621 (1996) 2. Victor, P.J., Muhuri, P.K., Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Thermodynamics of ionic association of tetraphenylphosphonium, tetraphenylarsonium, and some common cations in 2-methoxyethanol using conductometry and FT-Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 5350–5356 (2000) 3. Victor, P.J., Muhuri, P.K., Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Thermodynamics of ion association and solvation in 2methoxyethanol: behavior of tetraphenylarsonium, picrate and tetraphenylborate ions from conductivity and ultrasonic data. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 11227–11232 (1999) 4. Muhuri, P.K., Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Ionic association of some lithium salts in 1, 2-dimethoxyethane. A Raman spectroscopic and conductivity study. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 3329–3332 (1997) 5. Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Conductometric, viscometric and spectroscopic investigations on the solvation phenomena of alkali-metal ions and ion-pairs in 2-methoxyethanol. J. Phys. Chem. B 99, 269–273 (1995) 6. Nandi, D., Roy, M.N., Hazra, D.K.: Electrical conductances for tetraalkylammonium bromides, LiBF4 and LiAsF6 in tetrahydrofuran at 25 °. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 70, 305–310 (1993) 7. Jogodzinski, P., Petrucci, S.: Electrical conductances and ultrasonic relaxation for lithium perchlorate in tetrahydrofuran. J. Phys. Chem. 78, 917–925 (1974) 8. Das, D., Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Conductance of some 1:1 electrolytes in N,N-dimethylacetamide at 25 °C. J. Solution Chem. 31, 425–431 (2002) 9. Dasgupta, D., Das, S., Hazra, D.K.: Conductance studies of tetraalkylammonium bromides in 2methoxyethanol at 25 °C. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 84, 1057–1063 (1988) 10. Das, D., Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Viscosities of some tetraalkylammonium and alkali salts in N,Ndimethylacetamide at 25 °C. J. Solution Chem. 32, 85–91 (2003) 11. Das, D., Das, B., Hazra, D.K.: Electrical conductance of some alkali-metal salts in N,Ndimethylacetamide-water mixture at 25 °C. Z. Phys. Chem. 218, 341–348 (2004) 12. Covington, A.K., Dickinson, T.: Physical Chemistry of Organic Solvent Systems, p. 4. Plenum, New York (1973) 13. Inoue, N., Xu, M., Petrucci, S.: Temperature dependence of ionic association and molecular relaxation dynamics of LiAsF6 in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4628–4635 (1987) 14. Delsignore, M., Maaser, H.E., Petrucci, S.: Molecular relaxation of lithium salts in 2methyltetrahydrofuran at 25 °C. J. Phys. Chem. 88, 2405–2411 (1984) 15. Farber, H., Irish, D.E., Petrucci, S.: Molecular relaxation of LiAsF6 in 1,2-dimethoxyethane. J. Phys. Chem. 87, 3515–3520 (1983) 16. Fuoss, R.M., Krauss, C.A.: Properties of electrolytic solutions, IV. The conductance minimum and the formation of triple ions due to the action of coulombic forces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 2387–2399 (1933) 17. Krumgalz, B.S.: Separation of limiting equivalent conductances into ionic contributions in non-aqueous solutions by indirect methods. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1. 79, 571–587 (1983) 18. Delsignore, M., Farber, H., Petrucci, S.: Molecular relaxation dynamics and ionic association of LiBF4 in dimethoxymethane. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 66–72 (1986) 19. Saar, D., Petrucci, S.: Infrared and ultrasonic spectra of sodium thiocyanate and lithium thiocyanate in tetrahydrofuran. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 3326–3330 (1986) 20. Deng, Z., Irish, D.E.: A Raman spectral study of solvation and ion association in the systems LiAsF6 /CH3 CO2 CH3 and LiAsF6 /HCO2 CH3 . Can. J. Chem. 69, 1766–1773 (1991) 21. Masser, H., Xu, M., Hemmes, P., Petrucci, S.: Molecular relaxation dynamics and structure of LiClO4 solutions in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 3047–3055 (1987)