Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2008;16(3):378-80
Isolated rupture of the lateral collateral ligament during yoga practice: a case report SC Patel, DA Parker
Sydney Orthopaedic Arthritis and Sports Medicine, Chatswood, Sydney, Australia
ABSTRACT We report a case of isolated rupture of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) of the knee while attempting to place the left foot behind the head during yoga practice. The 34-year-old man had discomfort of the lateral aspect of the knee particularly with varus strain. A magnetic resonance image revealed rupture of the LCL at the insertion onto the fibula. The patient had grade-II laxity of the LCL and was treated nonoperatively. At the 12-month follow-up, grade-I laxity of the LCL remained clinically evident, but function was not impaired. Key words: collateral ligaments; knee; rupture
INTRODUCTION Isolated injury to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) of the knee is usually part of a more extensive injury involving the posterolateral structures,1–3 and is
uncommon.4,5 The usual injury mechanisms involve an impact producing hyperextension combined with a varus movement,6 or an anterior blow or valgus impact on the flexed knee.2 We report a case of isolated avulsion of the LCL caused by a low-energy, non-contact varus strain on the flexed knee during yoga practice. CASE REPORT In October 2006, a 34-year-old man presented with acute left knee pain after yoga practice. The yoga pose required flexion and varus movement of the left knee while putting the left foot over and behind the head. He felt discomfort and minor swelling around the lateral aspect of his knee after hearing a ‘pop’ during the manoeuvre. He was able to bear weight comfortably and to continue regular daily activities without difficulty; however, any varus strain on the knee produced localised lateral knee discomfort. Physical examination revealed normal alignment and gait with no effusion in the knee. There was mild focal tenderness over the fibular collateral
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr Sandeep Patel, Department of Orthopaedics, Waikato Hospital, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. E-mail:
[email protected]
Vol. 16 No. 3, December 2008
Isolated rupture of the lateral collateral ligament during yoga practice 379
(a)
(b)
oedema (Fig. a). The cruciate ligaments, posterolateral capsule, popliteus, and biceps tendon were intact. The patient chose non-operative treatment and declined a physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation programme. Eight weeks later, he achieved a very good functional result and was able to return to yoga practice, including poses producing varus strain. At the 6-month follow-up, he had persistent grade-I laxity of the LCL and hyperextension of the knee of 15º, with no posterolateral laxity. An MRI revealed the healed LCL with scar remodelling and with some degree of laxity of the mid-fibres (Fig. b). At the 12-month follow-up, the grade-I laxity of the LCL remained clinically evident, but function was not impaired. DISCUSSION
Figure Coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance images of the knee showing (a) avulsion of the lateral collateral ligament from its insertion on the fibular head (arrow) and (b) the healed ligament with some laxity in the fibrous substance 6 months later (arrow).
ligament near the insertion on the fibula. Range of movement was pain-free from 15º of hyperextension to 145º of flexion which represented a 5º increase in hyperextension compared to the contralateral knee. There was grade-II laxity of the LCL with a varus force on the knee at 30º of flexion. The anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and medial collateral ligament were stable. External rotation at 30º and 90º of knee flexion was symmetrical. Radiographs revealed no bony abnormality. A magnetic resonance image (MRI) revealed bone bruising in the medial tibial plateau and an avulsion of the fibular collateral ligament at its distal attachment from the fibular head, with surrounding soft-tissue
Repetitive strain on the LCL from extreme postures may have predisposed our patient to this injury. Continuous practice may result in a degree of chronic ligamentous attrition. Functionally, the LCL is taut in full extension and becomes lax after flexion beyond 30º.5 The LCL functions as the primary static restraint to varus forces on the knee, particularly in the initial 0º to 30º arc of knee flexion.7,8 It also functions to resist external rotation with the knee near extension, whereas the popliteus complex and popliteofibular ligament have more important roles in resisting external rotation with increasing knee flexion.3,5,9 In a cadaver study, isolated sectioning of the LCL caused only a small increase in laxity from 1º to 4º in varus rotation at all angles of knee flexion,7 despite evidence of complete disruption on MRI. This is because the remaining intact posterolateral structures afford some stability against varus forces. Injury to the LCL usually occurs as a soft-tissue avulsion off the proximal attachment on the femur or as a bone avulsion associated with an arcuate fracture of the fibular head.2,10 In our case, it was at the ligament insertion onto the fibular head, which was atypical. It is recommended that grades-I and -II injuries to the posterolateral structures of the knee be treated non-operatively and grade-III injuries be repaired or reconstructed, when more than one structure is involved.1 Optimal management of an isolated LCL injury is unknown because it is an infrequent presentation. Our patient opted for non-operative treatment to avoid the potential risks and prolonged rehabilitation associated with surgery, and to return to yoga practice as soon as possible.
380 SC Patel and DA Parker
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
REFERENCES 1. Kannus P. Nonoperative treatment of grade II and III sprains of the lateral ligament compartment of the knee. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:83–8. 2. LaPrade RF, Terry GC. Injuries to the posterolateral aspect of the knee. Association of anatomic injury patterns with clinical instability. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:433–8. 3. LaPrade RF, Tso A, Wentorf FA. Force measurements on the fibular collateral ligament, popliteofibular ligament, and popliteus tendon to applied loads. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1695–701. 4. Hughston JC, Andrews JR, Cross MJ, Moschi A. Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part II. The lateral compartment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:173–9. 5. Meister BR, Michael SP, Moyer RA, Kelly JD, Schneck CD. Anatomy and kinematics of the lateral collateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:869–78. 6. Covey DC. Injuries of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:106–18. 7. Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:233–42. 8. Grood ES, Stowers SF, Noyes FR. Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:88–97. 9. Sugita T, Amis AA. Anatomic and biomechanical study of the lateral collateral and popliteofibular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:466–72. 10. LaPrade RF, Gilbert TJ, Bollom TS, Wentorf F, Chaljub G. The magnetic resonance imaging appearance of individual structures of the posterolateral knee. A prospective study of normal knees and knees with surgically verified grade III injuries. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:191–9.
