Javan hawk-eagle Spizaetus Stresemann, 1924 - Naturalis repository

0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
UNPAD,. Bandung. Sniict. AC. 1990. Forest ecology on. Java: conversion and usage in a historical perspective. J. Trap. Forest Sc. 2: 286-302. Smict. AC. 1992.
Missing:
Contributions

to

Zoology,

SPB Academic

of the endemic

Conservation

Javan

70

161-173

(3)

Publishing bv,

(2001)

The

Hague

hawk-eagle Spizaetus bartelsi

Stresemann, 1924 (Aves: Falconiformes): density, age-structure and numbers

S.+(Bas)

Balen

van

Nature

'Tropica!

Bornsesteeg 69, ics,

Vincent ¹,

Conservation

6708 PD

²

& Resit Sözer

Nijman ²

population

and

Vertebrate

Ecology

The Netherlands.

Wageningen,

Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam,

forest

Key-words:: birds-of-prey, raptor,

Group,

Institute for

P.O. Box 94766,

fragmentation, Java,

The endemic

hawk-eagle Spizaetus bartelsi

Javan

because

is considered threatened with extinction

and

University,

Ecosystem Dynam-

1090 GT Amsterdam,

The Netherlands

Indonesia

Abstract

161

Introduction

161

Material

small

its habitat

size and

population the

on

fragmentation of

densely populated island of Java,

Indonesia. Like many other

tropical forest raptors

little is known about many of its meters. Research

in

Agricultural

Biodiversity

Contents

Abstract

of its

Wageningen

2

order

to

carried

was

the

assess

out

status

population

from 1980

of this

2000

Its

species.

Data

162 162

area

acquisition

Determination

164

of

164

densitly

165

Age-structure

para-

to

and methods

Study

Estimate

of

population

numbers

165

Statistical analysis

166

Results

presence

both

wet

was

confirmed

dry climatic

and

calculated

were

comparison these

with

zones.

published

may differ

island

in

Home range sizes

166

Distribution

Discussion

estimates suggests that

Density

significantly

and

day, and

with

short

a

long

dry

in

are

survey

between

areas.

dry

is

for all

been

captive

1.3. An

1:

large

timate that there account of

for

a

gestions more

for

insight

world

related habitat

age

servation,

including

gazettment of

more

new

non

lead

numbers

a

us

which

just short

obtaining

recruitment and and for strict

reserves.

and

improved

conservation

170

Acknowledgements

171

References

171

Appendix

I

172

Introduction

dento es-

number of sug-

aimed at

169

for further research

quality

remaining pairs, of

168

structure

adult

working

quality,

We make

preferences,

a

hawk-eagles have

population

dispersal,

per

areas

with

areas

of habitat

conservative

habitat

further research on

to

birds, the adult:

137-188

are

total

thousand birds.

a

and

a

to

167 168

and

Population

En-

field-observations,

assessment

and

sity differentiated

on

where Javan

areas

recorded,

compared

Based

season.

higher in

significantly

season

museum skins and

ratio

the order of 0.1-0.9 birds

were

166 size

²,

Suggestions counter rates

density

Age-composition and population

and

12-36 km

range between

to

the

throughout

improved

agecon-

law enforcement

The Sundaic the

hottest

area

region has been identified

biodiversity

that has lost

vegetation and

is

a

the

than

fish

(Myers

fragmentation

the island of Java, Indonesia, cover

has

in

one

of an

plant

original

turned the

and

ah, 2000).

et

region,

is most ancient

with less than

remaining under forest.

destruction of the Java

rich

different parts of the Sundaic

deforestation and

of land

as

earth, i.e.

high proportion of its primary

disproportional

vertebrates other

Among

hotspots

on

lowland

on

10%

The overall

vegetation

habitat of Java’s

on

rainforest

162

S.

into

specialists

quently,

fragmented of

patches

varying

endangered

critically

or

(Hilton-Taylor 2000; Collar these is a

the Javan

forest

tropical Hardly

endemic

eagle

parameters, demography

tropical forest raptors (Thiollay, to

in

species

species

few

1994). Compared

offspring often have prolonged 1994). Given the

destruction it is

1997;

ah 2001),

et

cluding birds of

On account of small for

a

ing

IUCN

to

threat

has been

recognised

Given the

relatively the

order for

low number of

and in order to allow essential

lation in

to

have

such

different

habitats, like

Unfortunately,

raptors, these data the relevant data ies and a new

and

a

sults latest

we

present

assessment

Birds (Collar

et

Stuart,

and

population

lacking.

conducted to

to

scant

on

in

be made it is

popu-

numbers.

tropical

In order to a

forest obtain

number of stud-

2000. Here on

we

present

original research

published

data. The

re-

study have been used in the

of the Red

ah, 2001).

major

the

with

ah,

et

100,000 km

montane)

Data Book for Asian

2

Tectona

estimated total

forest (lowland, 17th

in the

present

et

in the 2nd to 4th century

An

1996).

com-

loss of which may have

introduction of teak

of natural

was

probably

was

forest (MacKinnon

by tropical

the first

1982),

(Whitten

of

area

hill

and

(Smiet,

century

2 1990). About hundred years ago 40,000 km

was

left of this, but this further decreased to about 15,000 km

2

in

the

years

is

to

about 10,000 km 2

land, cash

further

century,

during the past

original vegetation and

largely replaced by cities

agricultural

crop

natural forest

10%

areas

of the

54% of the

villages, roads,

The

latter

natural

forest,

2% of the

forest type

is

along

easternmost part

forests

remain:

19% of the

original

lowland forest

1990; Whitten

1988; Smiet,

found scattered

leaving the

brasiliensis),

original

only

Pinus

habitat islands. Overall, less

as

mountain

hill forest, and

Balen,

Hevea

50

cover

plantations (e.g. cof-

Coffea spp), forest plantations (teak, pine

merkusii, rubber

the

The

(Smiet, 1992).

now

fee

half of the 20th

first

decreasing

now

the

et

almost

southern

ah,

exclusively and

coast

of the island of Java.

generalised

land

use

(van

1996).

1

Fig.

of the

cover

in

is-

land of Java.

given

eagles,

number of basic

and

pletely ah,

island of Java

covered

presents the

age-structure, densities

of status based

review of the of the

a

as

1980 surveys from

appraisal

surviving

for many other are

has

bird trade

subsequent monitoring,

insight in

parameters,

and

dependence areas

status assessment

accurate

an

&

illegal

large continuous forest

expected

disappear

ah, 2001).

et

the

Originally,

than

(Collar

hawk-eagle’s

Javan

in-

additional threat (Sozer

an

1995; Collar

Nijman,

Owens

hawk-eagle

the

recently as

to

to

endangered accord-

as

categories

more

prone

fragmentation

Javan

long time been classed

re-

ah 2000).

et

habitat

the

size

population

1988) whereas

and

severe

in

top-predators,

be the first prey, may

1988; Davies

(Terborgh,

animal

Bennett &

and

and

of forest

rate

especially

are

1997;

(McKinney,

Fagan

year,

fecundity and occurring

stricted ranges (endemics) extinction

larger

produce

widely believed that large

with low

species,

the

fledgling periods

alarming

area

grandis by early Hindus

not breed every

may

Study

numbers of

typically

year,

of Javan hawk-eagles

Material and methods

occurred

long-lived, hold large stable

throughout the

offspring and

(Clark,

Among bartelsi,

temperate regions, especially

probably

are

territories

Conservation

-

population

on

population

or

Sozer

endangered

2001).

available

are

classed

the island of Java.

to

& R.

Subse-

are

hawk-eagle Spizaetus

data

any

et al.

Nijman

of

system

sizes.

rainforest vertebrates

some ten

either

as

highly

a

forest

numerous

V.

Balen,

van

The

climate

longitudinal

on

Java differs

Java and the north coast have season,

greatly along the

axis of the island. The eastern part of

while in the

nowhere marked. In

western

a

pronounced

half it is

general, the

wettest

tion types (mixed

lowland and hill

ever-wet montane

forest) only

at

least 30

secutive

vegeta-

rainforest and

occur

in

areas

rainy days during the driest four

months

Lammertse,

(van

Steenis

dry

weak and

and

with con-

Schippers-

1965), and hence is mostly

found in

the western and central part of Java. Rain forest is also found east in

throughout

the otherwise

the wet “islands”

cloud stowage

on

seasonally dry

which arise

as

a

result of

the southern and south-eastern

slopes of the higher mountains (van Steenis, 1972). In est

the drier

replace

areas

moist

rainforest.

forest and deciduous for-

Contributions

to

Zoology,

70 (3)

-

2001

163

1996). al. et

Whiten (after

Madura and

Bali

Java, on

use

land

Genralised I.

Fig.

S.

164

Data

V.

Balen,

van

& R. Sozer

Nijman

Conservation

-

maintained, allowing observations

acquisition

comprehensive

Tropical

forest

observe.

Thiollay (1985) estimated

he

age

eagles

observed

of

only

the

Yamazaki pcrs. of the

ence

scanning hill

that

area

edge

or

aver-

does

fly

not

from

and

opening)

to

and

soar

all

(T.

by

point (i.c., the

searching

be assessed

calls heard

by

points and along

tage

Observations

general study specialised

small forest

the

over

surveys

van-

and

Java

on

species

assessed in

was

2 (50

areas

Halimun,

Murio,

Gazetteer) the

not

1994).

density)

dry

nine

Kulon,

Kawi-Kelud,

breeding

between encounter rate with

of the

Lebakharjo-Bantur, see

attempt

derivative for

of

al.

et

likely related

an

length

contiguous

Meyburg

relationship

in the

ing

occupy

(77%)

(1982)

was

juveniles and immatures do

(cf.

forest and in

eagles (as

the

reported

were

hold territories

plored

roads

near

these estimates

areas

1300(95%)

10493

et

on

study

1365

3163

Java

low

the

in Pasir

breeding male

effort.

area

Central

areas

relative

Remaining

West Java

through

mapped the locali-

sity is calculated by assuming that all adult eagles

704

forest

a

we

under-estimates.

breeding activities

sev-

inside natural for-

to and

sum-

presented

data from other researchers.

were

home ranges

remain-

were

(see Table I). While travelling (almost exclu-

sively

f

over

shared amongst

were

surveying

Java

cover

typically

weeks.

% of which

hawk-eagle.

areas

of areas

majority

least twice, while surveys

eral

est

forest

investigated

brief

a

are

polygon method. Given the limof the

certainly

compiled

we

a

Java. Home range size

convex

territories,

In

data

new

density

observed

accessibility

occur

of the Javan

occurrence

al. (1999);

Java, and another adult

Asri, Central

cal

expected

et

is

of density

we

West

2 able forest blocks (>50 km ) with known histori-

or

Balen

additional

In order to estimate

are

inside the forest.

transects

forest birds

The presence of the merous

from both these

are

also

made in the framework of

were

on

Presence could

display.

van

and

mary

scrutinised

were

the pres-

between 09.00 and 12.00 hours when the birds

expected

presented by

1898-1999

20%

assessed

was

vantage

a

from

95%

on

at

1995). Therefore

hawk-eagles

made. A

to be

in which all records of Javan

account

here.

(subtropi-

days with favourable weather

on

canopy

on

to

day while

per

nipalenis spends

hawk-eagle

Javan

top, forest

sky and

S.

it

comm.,

large

a

raptor

inside the forest, and

observed

days

difficult

notoriously

one

hawk-eagle

daytime perched

of

are

inside the rainforest. The

walking slowly cal mountain

of Javan hawk-eagles

Contributions to

under

(3)

the number of

by

2001

~

weather conditions.

good

measured

70

Zoology,

Dry

165

season

was

the

rainy days during

1991), which

(Newton

but also

quality,

persecution

four driest consecutive months of the year and taken

hawk

from

lowing parameters:

Steenis and

van

Schippers-Lammertse (1965).

eagles

Altitude.

eagle (Nijman extrapolate observations

to

tion of the total wild age structure is

cipal the

data

wild;

required.

sources

2)

population

were

Netherlands;

Bogor,

the wild and held in

collections

Mini

et

al.

hawk-eagle

by plumage patterns and

Javan

banding patterns

from

dark

very

as

is

brown,

in

lull

Javan

1995), fifth

at

but

year,

The

an

most

almost

tion

as

in other

classed

-

In

(1998).

as

black

are

com-

it

changes

in

downy

golden yellow in to

Nijman,

eagle species of comparable pers. comm.,

of the

observed in

c. one

wild

1990).

popula-

the field

year), immature (c.

five years) and adult (six

to

c.

20

as

est

breeding pairs

inhabited

of established

limited

and the

pairs

the

Steenis and

area.

by the availability

of

was

in number

Raptor numbers nest

sites

with

areas

mixed low-

least 30

at

types

of Javan

Schippers-Lammertse,

known

are

for-

rainy

contain

to

the

1965);

highest

hawk-eagle (Meyburg

ah,

et

these

densities

1989,

see

results). The

Ruggedness.

ruggedness of the

area

is

an

important feature for the

Javan

has been characterised

slope specialist (Wells,

1985). Tall forest ferred

to

forests

on

to survive

than in

area

an

size (cf Harris, is

significantly Balen

(van

The

ing.

size

from land scale

1:

figures

use

250

maps

are

of the

of

correlated

pre-

to

provided by

same

area

size

eagles

susceptible

fragments

more

forest

occurrence

Furthermore,

more

forest

one

frequency

2000). are

it

to

in

hunt-

measured

was

RePPProT (1990:

000). By comparing these figures with in

given

our

hawk-eagles

positively

of

be

large circular-shaped

1984), and

(e.g., MacKinnon and

a

to

as

plains (see results).

irregularly shaped

forest

fragmented

hawk-eagle

slopes is believed

Javan

in

ah,

et

as

flat

on

Fragmentation. likely

own

conservation et

management

1982; Whitten

ah,

data from the

tative estimate

The total

geographic

density expressed

per

in

occur

field,

we

et

ah,

made

a

plans 1996) quali-

of the available habitat.

population of

was

calculated

Javan

are

and prey

where B A

block; and H

=

=

=

hawk-eagles

in

n

forest

by

j_j

on



days during the four driest consecutive months (van

S

area

expected

lower elevations (see

at

one

years).

per forest

calculated by extrapolation based area

only



ofpopulation numbers

The number of

the Javan Hawk-

as

Climate. The richest forest types

blocks

Estimate

A

1996).

is therefore

2000)

densities

higher

ah,

land and hill rainforest and montane everwct

this

breeding only in its

starts

eagles

juvenile (fledgling -

Meyburg

hawk-eagle is believed

structure

age

recog-

juveniles into light

to

1979; Yamazaki

modelling we

in

subadults

likely

life

reach

et

results).

private

various

of four years (Sozer and age

size (Newton, For

Sozcr

Park,

markets

readily

additional clue

grey and lemon adults.

be

gar-

considered adult when

chicks, dark blue bluish-grey

mature

The

belly and wings

on

an

are

bird

described in

Nijman and

hawk-eagles

plete. Eye-colour

local

can

in

freshly cap-

zoological

Indonesia),

on

1989-2000).

period

the

Leiden,

Indonesia Indah Bird

encountered

Javan

in

(1989)

paper the

or

the

(during

nised

in

in

(Na-

museums

History

Surabaya Zoo, Taman Safari

stages

1)

to

prin-

Zoologicum Bogoriense

Museum

(Taman

of

observations

Indonesia); and 3) live eagles

tured from dens

this, three

stored in

specimens

tional Museum of Natural

estima-

an

assessment

an

To model

used:

to

ah,

et

Javan

by the fol-

tropical rainforest

(Whitten

relatively unspecialised raptor

structure

In order

of the

Productivity

by habitat

Density of

etc.

therefore determined

are

decreases with altitude

Age

determined

are

Number of

(equation

breeding pairs

per

1)

forest

the available habitat in each forest block;

the

density of pairs occurring in Habitat

quality type j. Habitat quality type is the median score

of the above described parameters

( climate

,

166

S.

van

ruggedness and fragmentation) each of which given

a

For be

score

less

areas

small

too

between 1

to

hawk-eagle

than

(‘ good ’) c.

50

km

area

error

Hapsoro

Mt

-

and Mt

in

Linsley

decades other

two

1999),

litt.

West

and Mt

Sawal

Cupu-

in Central

Ungaran and

1994),

analysis

Appendix

see

Mt

tributed

or

are

ordered

increase

to

as

data collected

most

the

non-parametric

dry

season

U test.

Fortesting

used

were

areas

differing

compared

were

an

with

independent, and whether there vey

effort,

a

in

p