Kernel weight distribution within oat (Avena sativa L.) panicles
Recommend Documents
clei being eliminated as microcytes. ... The eliminated microcytes gave origin to small and sterile ... crospore and was eliminated as a microcyte (Figure 2c).
Aug 12, 2011 - Aluminum resistance mechanisms in oat (Avena sativa L.) Lorien Radmer & Mesfin Tesfaye &. David A. Somers & Stephen J. Temple &.
May 23, 2010 - either as free fatty acids (FFAs) released from TAG or as intact TAG immediately degraded to FFAs. .... peroxisomes and can therefore not serve as a site for FFA ..... esis (Terasaki and Itabashi, 2003; Illijas et al., 2008; Seo.
Published November 29, 2011 ... November.29.2 ..... persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.).
Putative transgenic plants at the four- to five-leaf stage ... Genomic DNA samples were isolated from leaf tissue of green- ... 1996b) 'Jerry' and 'Ajay' (Bregitzer.
and Prine, 1958) and planting date (Stephens et al.,. 1977, and Ciha ..... John. Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.. Muter, D.A. 1984. Forage crops. McGraw-Hill.
Kernel weight distribution within oat (Avena sativa L.) panicles
May 16, 1995 - Abstract. Variability in kernel size of oats (Avena sativa L.) for processing necessitates grading into streams for hulling, followed by re-mixing for ...
Kernel weight distribution within oat (Avena sativa L.) panicles M.W. Crampton, D.J. Moot and R.J. Martin 1 Soil, Plant and Ecological Sciences Division, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand 1 New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Ltd., Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand
Abstract Variability in kernel size of oats (Avena sativa L.) for processing necessitates grading into streams for hulling, followed by re-mixing for product manufacture. This study investigated sources of kernel size variation within oat panicles. Crops of the milling oat cv. Drummond, sown on 16 September 1994 and 16 May, 1995 at Crop & Food Ltd, Lincoln, New Zealand, were analysed for systematic variation in panicle structure and kernel weight within the panicle. The grain yield per panicle was higher (P
