RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No. 2 Oktober 2015, 379-387 Available Online at http://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/jret
LANGUAGE, DIALECT AND REGISTER IN A SOCIOLINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE Made Budiarsa
Universitas Udayana
[email protected]
Abstrak Sosiolinguistik memberi perhatian pada aspek sosial bahasa manusia. Sosiolinguistik membahas hubungan antara bahasa dengan dengan masyarakat. Artikel ini difokuskan untuk membahas (1) bahasa, (2) dialek, (3) variasi bahasa, (4) tingkatan sosial, dan (5) register. Kelima hal ini merupakan hal problematik yang mengubungkan kehidupan sosial masyarakat lokal suatu daerah. Yang paling penting untuk diketahui adalah pembedaan suatu istilah terhadap yang lain. Ada tiga hal utama yang dibahas; bahasa, dialek dan register. Bahasa memiliki banyak keragaman. Keragaman bahasa terjadi karena adanya perbedaan tingkatan sosial dalam masyarakat. Tingkatan sosial menentukan bahasa yang digunakan oleh penuturnya yang terlibat dalam interaksi tersebut. Variasi bahasa dapat terjadi dalam bentuk dialek dan register. Dialek sebuah bahasa berhubungan faktor-faktor sosial seperti status sosial ekonomi, umur, jabatan penuturnya. Dialek merupakan variasi bahasa yang digunakan oleh kelompok penutur tertentu yang ditandai dengan penanda sistematik seperti penanda sintaksis, fonologi, dan gramatikal. Register adalah variasi bahasa berdasarkan penggunaaanya atau tujuannya. Hal ini bergantung seluruhnya terhadap tujuan utama penggunaan bahasa. Kata kunci: bahasa, dialek, register, dan sosiolinguistik
Abstract Sociolinguistics pays attention to the social aspects of human language. Sociolinguistics discusses the relationship between language and society. this paper, discusses the use of (1) language;(2) dialects; (3) language variation; (4) social stratifications;(5) register. This discussion talks about the five types of those topics because they are really problematic sort of things, which relate to the social life of the local people. In relation to this, the most important point is to distinguish the terms from one to another. There are three main points to discuss: language, dialects and register. Languages which are used as medium of communication have many varieties. These language variations are created by the existence of social stratification in the community. Social stratification will determine the form of language use by the speakers who involve in the interaction. The variation can be in the form of dialects and register. Dialect of a language correlates with such social factors such as socio-economic status, age, occupation of the speakers. Dialect is a variety of a particular language which is used by a particular group of speakers that is signaled by systematic markers such as syntactical, phonological, grammatical markers. Dialects which are normally found in the speech community may be in the forms of regional dialect and social dialect. Register is the variation of language according to the use. It means that where the language is used as a means of communication for certain purposes. It depends entirely on the domain of language used. It is also a function of all the other components of speech situation. A formal setting may condition a formal register, characterized by particular lexical items. The informal setting may be reflected in casual register that indicates less formal vocabulary, more non-standard features, greater instances of stigmatized variables, and so on. Keywords: language, dialect, register and sociolinguistic.
1. INTRODUCTION
term sociolinguistics is used to discuss the
The study of language which pays
relationship between language and society.
attention to the social aspects of language
It has been long known that there are many
is commonly called sociolinguistics. The
approaches used to discuss the function of
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 380
language in society. How people in certain
In order to avoid misunderstanding
communities use their languages to com-
between speakers in the society whenever
municate among them. As mentioned by
the communication takes place is to under-
Southerland and Katamba (1996:540) the
stand the speech varieties. It means that
locus of all sociolinguistic investigations is
speakers must know the norms of language
the speech community. The speech com-
function. Language function is how the
munity where the language is used as a
speakers use their language which has al-
means of communication can be a small
ready bound by the cultural or social
town, village, or even a club or as large as
norms. The understanding of the social
nation or a group of nations. They further
norms which relate to the way how people
note that the important characteristic of a
use the correct language in certain commu-
speech community is that its members
nication domain by recognizing who in-
share a particular language (or variety of
volves in the communication. In all com-
language) as well as the norms (or rules)
munities in the world, people have standard
for appropriate use of their language in so-
language to be developed as a guideline to
cial context. Because of the different lan-
communicate with each other.
guage background of the speakers in vari-
According to Holmes (1992:76) a
ous communities will create different kind
standard variety is one which is written,
of language variety due to the different sit-
and which has undergone some degree of
uation and social stratification of the speak-
regularization or codification; it is recog-
ers. In society, it is found that many causes
nized as prestigious variety or code by a
of speech community differentiation. One
community and it is used for H functions a
of them is the social status of the speakers
long side a diversity of low varieties. It is
such as teachers, workers, government offi-
further stated that standard varieties are
cial who has high rank in the office, reli-
codified varieties. Codification is usually
gion leaders, and so on. These differences
achieved through grammars and dictionar-
influence the form of language choice to be
ies which record, and sometimes pre-
used to communicate among them. They
scribed, the standard form of the language.
have to be aware of each other position. So
The codification process, which is part of
it is really very important for those speak-
the development of every standard variety,
ers who are involving in certain speech sit-
was accelerated in the case of English by
uation take into consideration the language
the introduction of printing in 1476, by
to be used. The wrong choice of expres-
William Caxton, the first English printer.
sions used by speakers of different social
He used the speech of London area the
status will be considered as impolite ex-
newly emerging standard dialect – as the
pressions.
basis for his translation. The most im-
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 381
portant point he emphasizes is that the de-
from Indonesia because they speak differ-
velopment of Standard English illustrates
ent mother tongue. They will be able to un-
the three essential criteria which character-
derstand each other if they use Indonesian
ize a standard: it was an influential or pres-
language. If they use Indonesian language
tigious variety, it was codified and stabi-
their tune of voice or pronunciation will be
lized, and it serves H functions in that it
different because their Indonesian is influ-
was used for communication at court, for
enced by their mother tongues. The differ-
literature and for administration. It is very
ence use of the same language which influ-
interesting to take into consideration the
ence by the local vernaculars or mother
idea proposed by Holmes (1992) in which
tongue of the speakers is normally called
he states that a standard language is always
regional variation. This regional variation
a particular dialect which has gained its
emerges due to the speakers different re-
special position as a result of social, eco-
gions. There are often found that the use of
nomic, and political influence. This is real-
different vocabularies in the varieties spo-
ly in away with the language condition in
ken in different regions. As mentioned by
Indonesia. The language situation in Indo-
Holmes (1992:195), language varies in
nesia is very complex due to the various
three major ways which are interestingly
vernacular languages used by the various
interrelated- over time, in physical space,
communities which have different cultural
and socially. Language variation over time
background. This situation is very im-
has its origins in spatial (or regional) and
portant to be taken into consideration by
social variation. All language change has
those who involve themselves in language,
its origin in variation. The possibility of
particularly socio linguistic study.
linguistic change exists as soon as a new form develops and begins to be used along-
2. LANGUAGE SITUATION
side an existing form.
The linguistic situation in multicultur-
Language choice in multicultural so-
al communities like in Indonesia has long
cieties normally influenced by certain so-
been considered, by linguists, as a complex
cial factors for example the factor of people
and interesting to be investigated for map-
you are talking with, the social context
ping out the linguistic appearance in every
where the communication takes place, and
area in Indonesia. There are many local
other factor like the function and topic of
vernaculars used by different people who
what is being talked. Those are important
live in different places in Indonesia. Ones
factors to determine the form of language
who live in different regions use different
choice in multicultural society likes Indo-
local vernaculars of their own. They won’t
nesia. The difference choice of expressions
understand each other although they are
and vocabularies will be strongly influ-
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 382
enced by the domains of language use.
to share ideas among the community group
These domains of language use will be the
members. Without language human being
focus of our attention in discussing the ap-
cannot do the communication with each
propriate form of language choice. The in-
other. So we are lucky because we have
terlocking system which is related to do-
language to be used to share our way of
mains, addressee, setting, and topics to be
thinking. In the society where he human
found in people real life interactions have
being live as a member of particular group
been identified as very relevant factors to
of people, there are various types of people
describe pattern of code choice in many
and they have different kind of cultural
different speech communities. It can be
background. Due to the fact that there are
said, further, that domain is one thing
many group of tribes living in the world
which is related to three important social
with different knowledge of language rules
factors in dealing with code choice they are
this will result in language variation when
participant who involve in the interaction,
they are dealing with communication with
setting is where the interaction among
each other. To do the communication, hu-
community members taking place, and the
man being should understand each other
third one is the topic of what is being dis-
position or post in order to be able to
cussed in the interaction.
choose the correct language or expressions
In short, it can be said that the form
to be used. It is also often found that there
of language choice in multicultural socie-
are many dialects variation in the life of
ties may be determined by the domains
people in the same community. A part from
when the talk takes place. As what has
dialects variation used by certain group of
been said that the complexity of language
people, the use of specific lexical items al-
choice in multilingual societies because
so illustrate the functional use of language
people who involve in the communication
in particular speech events. Sociolinguistics
must take into consideration many factors
can help us understand why we speak dif-
related to the certain domain. This tells us
ferently in various social contexts, because
very clearly that in choosing the variety of
sociolinguistics also tells us that in some
language to be used in real interaction in
communities the social stratification plays
our daily life is that we have to be clear
important role for language choice.
about what language variety to be chosen
knowing the social stratification of people
which are relevant to the domains. Socio-
who live in the society, at the same time
linguistics is the study of the relationship
they will be able to have the component of
between language and society. Language is
sociolinguistic competence. According to
a very important means of communication.
Canale and Swain (1980) this component
Society is the place where language is used
included both socio-cultural rules of use
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
By
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 383
and rules of discourse; here only the former
from one to another. We first need to con-
set of rules is referred to. Sociolinguistic
sider the clear concept of the terms men-
competence thus addresses the extent to
tioned above to make it easier to create lan-
which the utterances are produced and un-
guages, dialects, and register mapping.
derstood appropriately in different sociolinguistic contexts depending on contextual
Language
factors such as status of participant, pur-
It is a real means of communication.
pose of interaction, setting and scene. Par-
What does it mean to say that some variety
ticipant is considered to be most important
is a language? How to differentiate be-
aspect for language choice. For example,
tween language and dialect? This is the fo-
you probably wouldn't speak the same to
cus of attention of this paper. According to
your boss at work as you would do to your
Haugen (1966) there are two separate ways
friends, or speak to strangers as you would
of distinguishing them, and this ambiguity
to your family. Sociolinguistics may also
is a source of great confusion. He further
wonder whether women and men speak the
argues that reason for ambiguity, and the
same each other. Or why do people of the
resulting confusion, is precisely the fact
same age or from the same social class or
that dialect was borrowed from Greek,
same ethnicity use similar language? Soci-
where the same ambiguity existed. On the
olinguistics attempts to explain all these
other hand, there is a difference of size,
questions and more. Ultimately, sociolin-
because a language is larger than a dialect.
guistics is everywhere!
This is the sense in which we may refer to
In the following part of this paper we
English as a language, containing the total
are going to consider particular important
of all the terms in all its dialect, with
of making a sociolinguistic mapping of lan-
Standard English as one dialect among
guage use characterized by different group
many others. The other contrast between
of local people in the same community.
language and dialect is a question of pres-
The mapping will be particularly focusing
tige, a language having prestige which a
on the use of (1) language (2) dialects, (3)
dialect lacks.
language variation, (4) social stratification, and register.
Dialects
In this part, the discussion will be
If we are talking about dialects it is
dealing with the five types of those topics
necessary to understand, first of all, what is
because they are really problematic sort of
meant by standard language? Standard lan-
things, which relate the social life of the
guage is the only kind of variety which can
local people. In relation to this, the most
be called a proper language. It is normally
important point is to distinguish the terms
used by the government as a language to be
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 384
used as the administrative matters, in for-
cal, structural, lexical, and discourse fea-
mal situation like the language for educa-
tures of English (McKay and Hornberger
tion, law, economic activities, and so on. In
1996:149). The discussion is followed by
multilingual society, the use of standard
an examination of language variation due
language is very often deviate from its
to age and social class and network.
origin. The deviation is often found in the
Languages in the world will be differ-
form of lexical choices, pronunciation,
ent form one and another. Each language
grammar, phonology, morphology, and
has its rule to be followed by the people of
syntax. This deviation from the standard
the same tribes or groups. In this part of the
use is normally called a dialect of the same
paper, we are going to see what is meant by
language. Dialect may be defined as non-
language variation in more details.
standard use of a particular language. This
important question may be
can also be called a language variety. Dia-
language vary in its use?” The answer to
lect is a variety of a particular language
this question is that the language as a
which is spoken by a group of speakers that
means of communication can be used in
is signaled by systematic markers such as
different purposes in the real world. Due to
syntactical,
grammatical
the fact that the purpose of interaction, who
markers. Dialect may be in the forms of
are the people involving in the interaction,
regional dialect and social dialect.
where does the interaction take place, so-
Language variation
cial stratification, and so on, will contribute
As
phonological,
what
to the language variation. These factors are
Wardhaugh (1986:22) that variety is de-
the main things which will influence the
fined in terms of a specific set of linguistic
form of language choice to be used in the
items
interaction.
human
been
speech
stated
raised “why
by
or
has
The
patterns
(presumably, sounds, words, grammatical
According to Hudson (1980:24) the
features) which we can uniquely associate
term variety of language can be used to re-
with some external factors (presumably, a
fer to different manifestations of it in just
geographical area or a social group). This
the same way as one might take ‘music’ as
paper focuses on how the larger social con-
a general phenomenon and the distinguish
text affects an individual’s use of particular
different varieties of music . What make
linguistic forms illustrate a macro-level of
one variety of language different from an-
social analysis and a micro-level of linguis-
other are the linguistic items that it in-
tic analysis. Moreover, it will be seen how
cludes, so we may differ a variety of lan-
geographical location, ethnic background,
guage as a set of linguistic items with simi-
social class, and gender can all influence
lar social distribution. So, language varia-
an individual’s use of particular phonologi-
tion is considered to be the way of how
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 385
people use their language or languages for
Social stratification
no
According to Southerland and Katam-
speaker of a language or group of people
ba (1996:542) it is possible to correlate dif-
will speak exactly the same as others.
ferences of how people speak with their
Wardhaugh (1987:127) mentions that lan-
membership in various social groups. Per-
guage is varies in a number of ways. One
haps the most frequently invoked social
way of characterizing certain variation is to
correlate of language differentiation is so-
say that speakers of a particular language
cio-economic status. What is meant by so-
sometimes speak different dialect of a lan-
cio-economic status is that something asso-
guage. He further says that sociolinguistics
ciated with income level, type occupation,
today are concerned more with social vari-
type of housing, educational level, and sim-
ation in language than with regional varia-
ilar characteristics of speakers. These so-
tion. Linguists have along been aware of
cial statuses will influence the forms of lan-
variation in the use of language: individual
guage use to communicate in the social
do speak one way on one occasion and an-
groups. The people will be aware of how to
other way on another occasion, and this
use the language with those people who
kind of variation can be seen to occur with-
have high status in the society. The form of
in even the most localized groups. Hudson
language choice depends upon the people
(1980) further claims that the very general
who involve in the communication.
different
purposes.
Consequently,
notion ‘variety’ includes examples of what
It is further explained that the ap-
would normally be called, languages, dia-
proaches to study the linguistic differentia-
lects, and register, it will be noticed that it
tion in the speech community which pro-
is consistent with the definition to treat all
ceed from the assumption that socio-
the languages of some multilingual speak-
economic status is an important (or the
er, or community, as a single variety, since
most important) correlate of differences in
all the linguistic items concerned have a
language usage generally arrive at (or pro-
similar social distribution – they are used
ceed from) a view of vertical variation
by the same speaker, or community. Thus,
which is referred to as the social stratifica-
a variety can be much smaller than a
tion of language. Having seen the short ex-
‘language’, or event that a ‘dialect’. The
planation about social stratification pro-
flexibility of the term ‘variety’ allows us to
posed by Southerland and Katamba about
ask what basis there is for postulating the
the important factor that affects the form of
kind of ‘package’ of linguistic item to
language choice in the society it is reasona-
which we conventionally give label like
ble to claim that social differentiation of
‘language’, ‘dialect’ or ‘register’.
one sort or another is universal. Based on these ideas it is believed that there are al-
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 386
ways differences in speech communities
that an informal setting may be reflected in
and that these differences correlate with the
casual register that exhibits less formal vo-
existence of social group within the com-
cabulary,
munity.
greater instances of stigmatized variables,
The term speech community is wide-
more
non-standard
features,
and so on.
ly used by sociolinguists to refer to com-
Hudson (1980:48) mentions that the
munity based on language, but linguistic
term register is widely used in sociolinguis-
community is also used with the same
tics to river to variety according to use, in
meaning. Although we know that there are
contrast with dialects defined as varieties
many definition of speech community giv-
according to the user. It is very important
en by different linguists, with different sort
to make distinction between register and
of expressions, but we are sure that they
dialect because the same person may use
have the same meaning. In short, it can be
different linguistic items to express more or
said that speech community is the inter-
less the same meaning on different occa-
locking system of where the communica-
sions, and the concept of dialect cannot
tion among people who live in the same
reasonably be extended to include such
community take place. This may be nearly
variation. Each time a person speaks or
the same as what is called speech situation.
writes he not only locates himself with ref-
It is a condition in which there is appropri-
erence to the rest of society, but also relates
ate use of language by speakers of a partic-
his act of communication to a complex
ular community, with specific circumstanc-
classificatory scheme of communication
es such as setting and scene, participants of
behavior.
the interaction, and ends of the communication including both functions and outcomes.
3. CONCLUSION This short paper focuses on the social aspects of language use in real life speech
Register
situation. There are three main points to
The form that talk takes in any given
discuss: language, dialects and register.
context is called a register. Different regis-
Languages which are used as medium of
ter may be characterized in phonological,
communication have many varieties. These
syntactic, or lexical items. A register is also
language variations are created by the ex-
a function of all the other components of
istence of social stratification in the com-
speech situation. A formal setting may con-
munity. Social stratification will determine
dition a formal register, characterized by
the form of language use by the speakers
particular lexical items (Southerland and
who involve in the interaction. The lan-
Katamba, 1996:579). They further mention
guage variation can be in the form of dia-
Copyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668
RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Vol. 1, No.2 Oktober 2015, 387
lects and register. Dialect of a language correlates with such social factors such as socio-economic status, age, occupation of the speakers. Dialect is a variety of a par-
ticular language which is used by a particular group of speakers that is signaled by systematic markers such as syntactical, phonological, grammatical markers. Dialects which are normally found in the speech community may be in the forms of
regional dialect and social dialect. Register is the variation of language according to the use. It means where the language is used as a means of communica-
tion”. Dalam J. B. Pride, dan J. Holmes. (ed.). Sociolinguistics. Hermondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd. Holmes, janet. 1992 . An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London : Longman Group Limited. Hudson, R.A. 1980. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hymes, D. H. 1971. “On Communicative Competence”. Dalam J. B. Pride dan J. Holmes. (ed.). Sociolinguistics. Hermondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd. McKay, S. L. 1996. Sociolingustics and Language Teaching. Camridge: Cambridge University Press. O’Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., Katamba, F. 1996. Contemporary Linguistics an Introduction. Copp Clark Pitman Ltd. Wardhaugh, R. 1986. An Introduction to Sociolingustics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. …………….. http://wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sociolect (Accessed 2015-05-10).
tion for certain purposes. It depends entirely on the domain of language used. It is
also a function of all the other components of speech situation. A formal setting may condition a formal register, characterized by particular lexical items. The informal setting may be reflected in casual register that indicates less formal vocabulary, more non-standard features, greater instances of stigmatized variables, and so on. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author would like to thank Reviewer for the input that has been given to the improvement of substance to this article. BIBLIOGRAPHY Canale, M., Swain, M. 1980. “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing”. Applied Linguistics. 1, 1: 1-47. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education. Haugen, E. 1966. “Dialect, Language and NaCopyright © 2015, RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, P-ISSN: 2406-9019, E-ISSN: 2443-0668