Cycle endurance (sec) 391±177 379±295 .857. 1Department of Pulmonology MEREM, Asthma Center Heideheuvel,. Hilversum; Department of Pulmonology, ...
Larger improvements in endurance capacity in fat-free mass depleted COPD patients by non-linear resistance training. Dr. Peter Klijn1, Dr. Anton van Keimpema1,2, Dr. Henk van Stel3, Prof. Dr. Rik Gosselink4
RATIONALE: COPD patients with wasting of fat-free mass (FFM) are characterized by skeletal muscle weakness. Progressive linear resistance training with
a moderate number of repetitions (8-10) and high intensity 70% 1RM (maximum load) leads to improvements in muscle strength and exercise performance. Non-linear resistance training (NLR) with variation or periodization (i.e. programmed daily variation in the training stimuli) has shown to enhance training effects in healthy subjects. Therefore, we studied the effects of a 6-week non-linear resistance training program in FFM depleted COPD patients.
Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire
Constant Work Rate cycle Test
Change scores at 6 weeks
75% Wmax
Department of Pulmonology MEREM, Asthma Center Heideheuvel, Hilversum; Department of Pulmonology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; 3Julius Center for Health Sciences and P rimary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands and 4Respiratory Rehabilitation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 1
1,2
1.000
1,0
CRQ score
0,8 Minimal important difference
0,6 0,4
cycle time (sec)
800
600
400
200
0,2
0
0,0 Non-linear resistance training
Dyspnea
Fatigue
Combined endurance and progressive resistance training
Emotions
Mastery
Non-linear resistance training
Baseline
6 weeks
Combined endurance and progressive resistance training
METHODS: COPD patients (FEV1 20 repetitions, 30-50% 1RM]. NLR EPR Age (year) 59±7.6 60±5.3 FEV1 (%pred) 32±9.4 33±10.3 FFMi (kg FFM/m2) 13.8±1.1 14±1.3 Cycle endurance (sec) 391±177 379±295
p .386 .689 .438 .857
RESULTS: After 6 weeks a significant larger improvement in cycle endurance time (75%Wmax) was found in NLR (391±177 to 858±369sec) compared to EPR (379±295 to 521±346sec), p