Lecture 4 - Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering

121 downloads 130 Views 3MB Size Report
Oct 1, 2013 ... Assignment 1 is due. Assignment 2 is given out. Static & Fatigue Failure. Various. Ch – 5 Shigley. Ch – 6 Shigley. 30th. Sept. 4. FMEA. Various.
FME461 Engineering Design II Dr.Hussein Jama [email protected] Office 414 Lecture: Mon 8am -10am Tutorial Tue 3pm - 5pm

10/1/2013

1

Semester outline Date

Week

Topics

9th Sept

1

House keeping issues Introduction to mechanical design Assignment 1 is given out

16th Sept 23rd Sept

2

Ethics & safety

Various

3

Assignment 1 is due Assignment 2 is given out Static & Fatigue Failure

Various Ch – 5 Shigley Ch – 6 Shigley

30th Sept 7th Oct

4

FMEA

Various

5

Continuous Assessment Test 1 (15%) Assignment 2 is due Assignment 3 is given out

14th Oct

6

Shafts and shaft components

Ch – 7 Shigley

21st Oct

7

Welding and permanent joints

Ch – 9 Shigley

28th Oct

8

Mechanical springs

Ch – 10 Shigley

4th Nov 11th Nov

9 10

Clutches & brakes Belts and chains

Ch – 16 Shigley Ch – 17 Shigley

18th Nov

11

Statistical consideration

Ch – 20 Shigley

25th Nov

12

Continuous Assessment Test 2 (15%)

13

Presentation of assignment 2 Assignment 2 is due

10/1/2013

2nd Dec

Reference Reading Ch 1 - Norton, Shigley

2

Discussion 

Shigley Chapter 5 - Static failure criteria  



Ductile materials Brittle materials

Shigley – Chapter 6 Fatigue failure criteria

10/1/2013

3

Static & Fatigue Failure Static load – a stationary load that is gradually applied having an unchanging magnitude and direction Failure – A part is permanently distorted and will not function properly A part has been separated into two or more pieces. 10/1/2013

4

Static failure theories 

 

Maximum shear Stress theory Distortion energy theory Ductile Coulomb-Mohr theory

10/1/2013

5

Definitions Material Strength Sy = Yield strength in tension, Syt = Syc Sys = Yield strength in shear Su = Ultimate strength in tension, Sut Suc = Ultimate strength in compression Sus = Ultimate strength in shear = .67 Su

10/1/2013

6

Ductile and brittle materials A ductile material deforms significantly before fracturing. Ductility is measured by % elongation at the fracture point. Materials with 5% or more elongation are considered ductile.

10/1/2013

Brittle material yields very little before fracturing, the yield strength is approximately the same as the ultimate strength in tension. The ultimate strength in compression is much larger than the ultimate strength in tension. 7

Failure theories – Ductile materials • Maximum shear stress theory (Tresca 1886)

( maspecimen of the same material when that specimen x )component > ( )obtained from a tension test at the yield point

Failure

= Sy

To avoid failure =

Sy 2

(

)

max component

= Sy max

=

Sy 2n


> (Sy)t Distortion contributes to failure much more than change in volume.

h

h

t

(total strain energy) – (strain energy due to hydrostatic stress) = strain energy due to angular distortion > strain energy obtained from a tension test at the yield point → failure 10/1/2013

10

Plane stress problems

10/1/2013

11

Stress components

10/1/2013

12

Failure theories – ductile materials The area under the curve in the elastic region is called the Elastic Strain Energy. 3D case

U=½ ε

UT = ½

ε +½

1 1

ε +½

2 2

ε

3 3

Stress-strain relationship

ε1 = ε2 = ε3 = 10/1/2013

UT =

1

2E

(

2 1

+

2 2

+

2 3

1

v

E 2

E 1

v

E 3

E 1

v

E

) - 2v (

2

1

E

2

+

v v

3

E 3

E 2

v 1

E

3

+

2

3)

13

Failure theories – Ductile materials Distortion strain energy = total strain energy – hydrostatic strain energy 1 UT = ( 12 + 22 + 32) - 2v 2E Substitute

Uh =

1

1

(

= 2

2

3=

2 h

+

Simplify and substitute

1

2E

3 Uh =

h

+

=

2 h

2E

(1 – 2v) =

(

1

2

+

1

3

) - 2v (

h

h

+

h

h+

+

=3

h

+ 1

+

2

3

)

(1)

h

2

(

Ud = UT – Uh

2

+

2

3

+

h

h

h

)

into the above equation

2 (1 – 2v) ) 3

6E

Subtract the hydrostatic strain energy from the total energy to obtain the distortion energy 10/1/2013 Ud = UT – Uh =

1+v

6E

(

1–

2 ) + ( 2

1–

2 ) + ( 3

2–

(2) 2 ) 3

14

Failure theories – Ductile materials Strain energy from a tension test at the yield point 1=

Sy and

2

=

U d = UT – Uh =

3

=0

1+v

6E

Substitute in equation (2)

(

2 ) + ( 2

1–

Utest = (Sy)

2

1–

2 ) + ( 3

2–

2 ) 3

1+v

3E

To avoid failure, Ud < Utest

(

1–

2 ) + ( 2

2 ) + ( 3

1–

2

10/1/2013

2–

2 ½ ) 3


Sut Mohr’s circles for compression and tension tests.

Suc

3

Stress state

1

Sut

Tension test Compression test

Failure envelope The component is safe if the state of stress falls inside the failure envelope. 10/1/2013 25 1 > 3 and 2 = 0

Failure theories – brittle materials Modified Coulomb-Mohr theory 3 or

2

3 or

Sut Safe

Sut Safe

I

Sut

Sut

1

Suc

1

Safe

-Sut

III

Suc

Cast iron data

II -Sut

Safe

10/1/2013

2

Suc

Three design zones 26

Failure theories – brittle materials Zone I

3

1> 0,

=

1

2 > 0 and

1

>

Sut 2

I

Sut

Design equation

n

1

II -Sut

Zone II

III 1

>0,

1

=

2

Sut

n

< 0 and

2

< Sut Suc

Design equation

Zone III 1

10/1/2013

>0,

2 < 0 and

2

> Sut

1 (

1 1 1 – )– 2 = n Sut Suc Suc Design equation

27

Summary – Brittle materials

10/1/2013

28

Example

10/1/2013

29

Solution

10/1/2013

30

Solution continued

10/1/2013

31

Static failure summary - Ductile

10/1/2013

32

Summary – Brittle materials

10/1/2013

33

Failure theories - Fatigue It is recognised that a metal subjected to a repetitive or fluctuating stress will fail at a stress much lower than that required to cause failure on a single application of load. Failures occurring under conditions of dynamic loading are called fatigue failures. Fatigue failure is characterized by three stages

10/1/2013



Crack Initiation



Crack Propagation



Final Fracture 34

Jack hammer component, shows no yielding before fracture. Crack initiation site

Fracture zone 10/1/2013

Propagation zone, striation

35

Example VW crank shaft – fatigue failure due to cyclic bending and torsional stresses

Propagation zone, striations

Crack initiation site 10/1/2013

Fracture area 36

928 Porsche timing pulley

10/1/2013

Crack started at the fillet

37

Fracture surface of a failed bolt. The fracture surface exhibited beach marks, which is characteristic of a fatigue failure.

25mm diameter steel pins from agricultural equipment. Material; AISI/SAE 4140 low allow carbon steel

10/1/2013

38

bicycle crank spider arm

This long term fatigue crack in a high quality component took a considerable time to nucleate from a machining mark between the spider arms on this highly stressed surface. However once initiated propagation was rapid and accelerating as shown in the increased spacing of the 'beach marks' on the surface caused by the advancing fatigue crack. 10/1/2013

39

Crank shaft

Gear tooth failure

10/1/2013

40

Hawaii, Aloha Flight 243, a Boeing 737, an upper part of the plane's cabin area rips off in mid-flight. Metal fatigue was the cause of the failure.

10/1/2013

41

Fracture surface characteristics Mode of fracture

Typical surface characteristics

Ductile

Cup and Cone Dimples Dull Surface Inclusion at the bottom of the dimple

Brittle Intergranular

Shiny Grain Boundary cracking

Brittle Transgranular

Shiny Cleavage fractures Flat

Fatigue

Beachmarks Striations (SEM) Initiation sites Propagation zone Final fracture zone

10/1/2013

42

Fatigue failure – type of fluctuating stresses

Alternating stress a= min a=

m=

2

=0 Mean stress max /

2 max m

= 10/1/2013

min

max

+ 2

min

43

Fatigue Failure, S-N Curve

Test specimen geometry for R.R. Moore rotating beam machine. The surface is polished in the axial direction. A constant bending load is applied.

Typical testing apparatus, pure bending Motor

Load

Rotating beam machine – applies fully reverse bending stress 10/1/2013

44

Fatigue Failure, S-N Curve

Finite life

Infinite life

S′e

Se′ = endurance limit of the specimen 10/1/2013

45

Relationship Between Endurance Limit and Ultimate Strength Steel

Se′ =

0.5Sut

Sut ≤ 200 ksi (1400 MPa)

100 ksi

Sut > 200 ksi

700 MPa Sut > 1400 MPa

Cast iron

Se′ =

0.4Sut

Sut < 60 ksi (400 MPa)

24 ksi

Sut ≥ 60 ksi

Cast iron

160 MPa Sut < 400 MPa 10/1/2013

46

Relationship Between Endurance Limit and Ultimate Strength Aluminium

Se′ =

0.4Sut

Sut < 48 ksi (330 MPa)

19 ksi

Sut ≥ 48 ksi

130 MPa Sut ≥ 330 MPa

Copper alloys Copper alloys

Se′ =

0.4Sut

Sut < 40 ksi (280 MPa)

14 ksi

Sut ≥ 40 ksi

100 MPa Sut ≥ 280 MPa For N = 5x108 cycle 10/1/2013

47

For materials exhibiting a knee in the S-N curve at 106 cycles S ′ = endurance limit of the specimen (infinite life > 106) e

Se = endurance limit of the actual component (infinite life > 106) S 103

Se 106

N

For materials that do not exhibit a knee in the S-N curve, the infinite life taken at 5x108 cycles

Sf′ = fatigue strength of the specimen (infinite life > 5x108) Sf = fatigue strength of the actual component (infinite life > 5x108) S 10/1/2013

103

Sf 5x108

N

48

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit Se = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (S′e) Sf = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Sf′) • Load factor, Cload

10/1/2013

(page 326, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

Pure bending

Cload = 1

Pure axial

Cload = 0.7

Pure torsion

Cload = 1 if von Mises stress is used, use 0.577 if von Mises stress is NOT used.

Combined loading

Cload = 1

49

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit • Size factor, Csize

(p. 327, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

Larger parts fail at lower stresses than smaller parts. This is mainly due to the higher probability of flaws being present in larger components.

For rotating solid round cross section

d ≤ 0.3 in. (8 mm)

Csize = 1

0.3 in. < d ≤ 10 in.

Csize = .869(d)-0.097

8 mm < d ≤ 250 mm

Csize = 1.189(d)-0.097

If the component is larger than 10 in., use Csize = .6 10/1/2013

50

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit For non rotating components, use the 95% area approach to calculate the equivalent diameter. Then use this equivalent diameter in the previous equations to calculate the size factor. A95 = (π/4)[d2 – (.95d)2] = .0766 d2

d95 = .95d

d

Solid or hollow non-rotating parts

10/1/2013

dequiv = .37d

dequiv = (

A95 0.0766

)1/2

Rectangular parts

51

dequiv = .808 (bh)1/2

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit I beams and C channels

10/1/2013

52

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit • surface factor, Csurf

(p. 328-9, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

The rotating beam test specimen has a polished surface. Most components do not have a polished surface. Scratches and imperfections on the surface act like a stress raisers and reduce the fatigue life of a part. Use either the graph or the equation with the table shown below.

Csurf = A (Sut)b

10/1/2013

53

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit • Temperature factor, Ctemp

(p.331, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

High temperatures reduce the fatigue life of a component. For accurate results, use an environmental chamber and obtain the endurance limit experimentally at the desired temperature. For operating temperature below 450 oC (840 oF) the temperature factor should be taken as one.

Ctemp = 1

10/1/2013

for T ≤ 450 oC (840 oF)

54

Correction factor’s for specimen’s endurance limit • Reliability factor, Crel (p. 331, Norton’s 3rd ed.) The reliability correction factor accounts for the scatter and uncertainty of material properties (endurance limit).

10/1/2013

55

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor, Kf Experimental data shows that the actual stress concentration factor is not as high as indicated by the theoretical value, Kt. The stress concentration factor seems to be sensitive to the notch radius and the ultimate strength of the material. Notch sensitivity factor Fatigue stress Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q concentration factor rd (p. 340, Norton’s 3 ed.)

Steel

10/1/2013

56

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor, Kf for Aluminum (p. 341, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

10/1/2013

57

Design process •

Determine the maximum alternating applied stress ( the size and cross sectional profile



Select material → Sy, Sut



Choose a safety factor → n



Determine all modifying factors and calculate the endurance limit of the component → Se



Determine the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kf



Use the design equation to calculate the size

Kf

a)

in terms of

Se a= n



Investigate different cross sections (profiles), optimize for size or weight



You may also assume a profile and size, calculate the alternating stress and determine the safety factor. Iterate until you obtain the desired 58 safety factor

10/1/2013

Design for finite life

Sn = a (N)b equation of the fatigue line A S

B Se 106

103

Point A

Point B 10/1/2013

N

Sn = .9Sut

Point A

Sn = .9Sut

N = 10

N = 103

Sn = Se

Sn = Sf

3

6

N = 10

Point B

N = 5x108

59

Design for finite life Sn = a (N)b

log Sn = log a + b log N Apply boundary conditions for point A and B to find the two constants “a” and “b”

log .9Sut = log a + b log 10

a=

3

log Se = log a + b log 106

b=

N

Sn = Se ( 106 ) Calculate Sn

2

Se 1 3

log

.9Sut Se

Se log ( .9S ) ut

and replace Se in the design equation Kf

10/1/2013



(.9Sut)

a=

Sn n

Design equation 60

The effect of mean stress on fatigue life Mean stress exist if the loading is of a repeating or fluctuating type.

a

Mean stress is not zero

Gerber curve Alternating stress

Se Goodman line

Soderberg line 10/1/2013

Sy Mean stress

Sut

m 61

The effect of mean stress on fatigue life goodman diagram a

Yield line

Alternating stress

Goodman line Safe zone

C

Sy

Sut

m

Mean stress

10/1/2013

62

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram a

Sy

Yield line

Goodman line Safe zone -

m

10/1/2013

- Syc

Safe zone

Sy

Sut

+

m

63

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram Fatigue,

m

≤0

Fatigue, a

a

Se a=

Se

nf

m

10/1/2013

Sut m

Sut

m

=

>0 = = 1

1

Infinite life

nf Finite life Yield

Syc

ny Safe zone

-

Sn

+

m

Se

Yield a+

a

+

m

Safe zone

C

a+

m

=

Sy

ny

- Syc

64

Applying Stress Concentration factor to Alternating and Mean Components of Stress •

Determine the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kf, apply directly to the alternating stress → Kf



If Kf

max

a

< Sy then there is no yielding at the notch, use Kfm = Kf

and multiply the mean stress by Kfm → Kfm •

m

> Sy then there is local yielding at the notch, material at the notch is strain-hardened. The effect of stress concentration is reduced. If Kf

max

Calculate the stress concentration factor for the mean stress using the following equation, Kfm =

Sy

Kf

a

m

Fatigue design equation Kf a Kfm m = +

Se

10/1/2013

Sut

1

nf

Infinite life 65

Combined loading All four components of stress exist, xa

alternating component of normal stress

xm

mean component of normal stress

xya

alternating component of shear stress

xym

mean component of shear stress

Calculate the alternating and mean principal stresses, 1a,

1m, 10/1/2013

2a

=(

xa /2)

(

2 / 2 ) +( xa

2 ) xya

2m

=(

xm /2)

(

2 / 2 ) +( xm

2 ) xym 66

Combined loading Calculate the alternating and mean von Mises stresses, a′ = (

2

1a

m′ = (

2

1m

+ +

2

2a -

1a

2

2m -

1m

1/2 ) 2a 1/2 ) 2m

Fatigue design equation

′a Se 10/1/2013

+

′m Sut

=

1

nf

Infinite life

67

Example 6-7

10/1/2013

68

Example 6-9

Shaft is made from SAE1050 steel and is cold formed

10/1/2013

69

10/1/2013

70

Solution

10/1/2013

71

Solution

10/1/2013

72

10/1/2013

73