Lecture: Introduction to infectious disease dynamics and ...

46 downloads 151 Views 6MB Size Report
Feb 24, 2010 ... Introduction to models of infectious disease dynamics. - some basic biology of infectious diseases (not much). - standard classes of models.
Dynamics of Infectious Diseases A module in Phys 7654 (Spring 2010): Basic Training in Condensed Matter Physics Feb 24 - Mar 19 Chris Myers [email protected] Clark 517 / Rhodes 626 / Plant Sci 321

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Overview of module •

Introduction to models of infectious disease dynamics - some basic biology of infectious diseases (not much) - standard classes of models ‣ compartmental (fully-mixed) ‣ spatial (metapopulations & network-based) - phenomenology of disease dynamics & control ‣ epidemic thresholds, herd immunity, critical component



Wednesday, February 24, 2010

size, percolation, role of contact network structure, stochastic vs. deterministic models, control strategies, etc. case studies (FMD, SARS, measles, H1N1?)

Tentative schedule • • • • • • • • •

Wed 2/24 : Lecture Fri 2/26✧: Lecture Wed 3/3

: Lecture; Homework #1 due (see website)

Fri 3/5

: No Class (Physics Prospective Grad Visit Day)

Wed 3/10 : Myers away - possibly a guest lecture Fri 3/12✧: Lecture Wed 3/17*: Lecture Fri 3/19*: Lecture 3/20-3/28: Spring break; module finished *APS March Meeting (Myers here. Who is away?) ✧Overlap with CAM colloquium (Fri 3:30)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Resources •

Course website - www.physics.cornell.edu/~myers/InfectiousDiseases - also accessible via Basic Training website: ‣ people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~emueller/

-

Basic_Training_Spring_2010/Infectious_Diseases.html contains links to relevant reading materials (some requiring institutional subscription*), lecture slides, class schedule, homeworks, etc. (continually updated)

* use Passkey from CIT: https://confluence.cornell.edu/display/CULLABS/Passkey+Bookmarklet

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Resources •

Books -

M. Keeling & P. Rohmani, Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals [K&R]; programs online at www.modelinginfectiousdiseases.org

-

O. Diekmann & J.A.P. Heesterbeek, Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases [D&H]

-

R.M. Anderson & R.M. May, Infectious Diseases of Humans [A&M]



D.J. Daley & J. Gani, Epidemic Modeling: An Introduction [D&G] S. Ellner & J. Guckenheimer, Dynamic Models in Biology (Ch. 6) [E&G]

Local activity -

EEID - Ecology and Evolution of Infections and Disease at Cornell

‣ -

website at www.eeid.cornell.edu, mailing list: [email protected]

8th annual EEID conference: http://www.eeidconference.org/



Wednesday, February 24, 2010

to be held at Cornell in early June 2010

Simulations: Milling about at a conference •

Individuals executing random walk on a 2D square lattice



Two individuals in “contact” if they occupy the same lattice site



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious



Infectious individuals can infect susceptibles with probability β



Infectious individuals can recover with probability γ

BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Simulations: Milling about at a conference •

Individuals executing random walk on a 2D square lattice



Two individuals in “contact” if they occupy the same lattice site



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious



Infectious individuals can infect susceptibles with probability β



Infectious individuals can recover with probability γ

BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Dynamics

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Tracing distribution of infectious contacts

network of infectious spread

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Increased infectiousness



Same as before, except two individuals in “contact” if they occupy the same lattice site or are on neighboring sites



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Increased infectiousness



Same as before, except two individuals in “contact” if they occupy the same lattice site or are on neighboring sites



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Dynamics

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Vaccination



Same as original simulation, except 40% of the population has been vaccinated



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious



CYAN = vaccinated (and immune)

BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Vaccination



Same as original simulation, except 40% of the population has been vaccinated



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious



CYAN = vaccinated (and immune)

BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Dynamics

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Culling •

Same as original simulation, except instead of recovery, infecteds - and their nearest neighbors - are culled at rate c -

ORIGIN Middle English : from Old French coillier, based on Latin colligere (see collect).



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious



Finding an “optimal” culling strategy is a politically and economically sensitive issue

GREY = culled (and dead)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Culling •

Same as original simulation, except instead of recovery, infecteds - and their nearest neighbors - are culled at rate c -

ORIGIN Middle English : from Old French coillier, based on Latin colligere (see collect).



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious



Finding an “optimal” culling strategy is a politically and economically sensitive issue

GREY = culled (and dead)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Culling (take 2)



Same as last simulation, with a higher cull rate



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious GREY = culled (and dead)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Culling (take 2)



Same as last simulation, with a higher cull rate



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious GREY = culled (and dead)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Inhomogeneous mixing



Two segregated subpopulations, with a small percentage of mixers who flow freely back and forth



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Inhomogeneous mixing



Two segregated subpopulations, with a small percentage of mixers who flow freely back and forth



RED = susceptible (not infectious)

• •

YELLOW = infectious BLUE = recovered (and immune)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Dynamics

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Scales, foci & the multidisciplinary nature of infectious disease modeling & control

response

- control strategies - epidemiology - public health & logistics - economic impacts

between hosts

- disease ecology - demography - vectors, water, etc. - zoonoses - weather & climate transmission

within-host

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

- virology, bacteriology, mycology, etc. - immunology

Scales, foci & the multidisciplinary nature of infectious disease modeling & control

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Scales, foci & the multidisciplinary nature of infectious disease modeling & control

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Infection Timeline

K&R, Fig. 1.2

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Compartmental models •

Assumptions: -



population is well-mixed: all contacts equally likely only need to keep track of number (or concentration) of hosts in different states or compartments

Typical states -

Susceptible: not exposed, not sick, can become infected Infectious: capable of spreading disease Recovered (or Removed): immune (or dead), not capable of spreading disease Exposed: “infected”, but not infectious Carrier: “infected” (although perhaps asymptomatic), and capable of spreading disease, but with a different probability

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Compartmental models SIR: lifelong immunity

S

I

SIS: no immunity

S

I

SEIR: SIR with latent (exposed) period

S

SIR with waning immunity

S

SIR with carrier state

E

R

I

I

R

R

C S

I R

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

adapted from K&R

An aside on graphical notations S

I

state transitions influence

R

adapted from K&R

S

I infection

R recovery

Petri Net: bipartite graph of places (states) and transitions (reactions)

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

A&M, Fig. 2.1

Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) • •

Dates back to Kermack & McKendrick (1927), if not earlier Assume initially no demography



Let:

• •

disease moving quickly through population of fixed size N X = # of susceptibles; proportion S = X/N Y = # of infectives; proportion I = Y/N Z = # of recovereds; proportion R = Z/N note X+Y+Z = N, S+I+R=1

average infectious period = 1/γ force of infection λ

-

per capita rate at which susceptibles become infected

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

S

I infection

dS/dt dI/dt dR/dt

R recovery

= −βSI = βSI − γI = γI

Transmission & mixing •

Must make assumption regarding form of transmission rate - N = population size, Y = number of infectives, and β = product of contact rates and transmission probability

• •

mass action (frequency dependent, or proportional mixing) - force of infection λ = βY/N; # contacts is independent of the population size pseudo mass action (density dependent) - force of infection λ = βY; # contacts is proportional to the population size

mass action: κ = # contacts / unit time; c = prob. of transmission upon contact; 1-δq = prob. that a susceptible escapes infection in time δt

1 − δq δq

= =

(1 − c) 1 − e−βY δt/N where β = −κlog(1 − c) (κY /N )δt

lim δq/δt = dq/dt = βY /N

δt→0 Wednesday, February 24, 2010

SIR dynamics S

I infection

R recovery

dS/dt = −βSI dI/dt = βSI − γI

γ= 1.0

dR/dt = γI

Wednesday, February 24, 2010



Outbreak dies out if transmission rate is sufficiently low



Outbreak takes off if transmission rate is sufficiently high

R0 and the epidemic threshold Introduction into fully susceptible population

dI/dt = I(β − γ) > 0 if β/γ > 1 < 0 if β/γ < 1

I infection

(grows) (dies out)

• define basic reproductive ratio:

R0 = β/γ = average number of secondary cases arising from an average primary case in an entirely susceptible population

• epidemic threshold at R0 = 1 Wednesday, February 24, 2010

S

R recovery

dS/dt dI/dt

= =

dR/dt

=

dS/dτ dI/dτ

= =

dR/dτ τ

= =

−βSI βSI − γI γI

−R0 SI R0 SI − I I γt

R0 and the epidemic threshold

R0 = β/γ = average number of secondary cases arising from an average primary case in an entirely susceptible population ≈ transmission rate / recovery rate

• epidemic threshold at R0 = 1 - fraction of susceptibles must exceed γ/β - R0-1 [relative removal (recovery) rate] must be small enough to allow disease to spread

• estimating R0 from incidence data is a major goal when confronted with new outbreak

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Epidemic burnout dS/dR = −βS/γ = −R0 S

S

I infection

• integrate with respect to R:

S(t) = S(0)e

dS/dt dI/dt

R ≤ 1 =⇒ S(t) ≥ e−R0 > 0

dR/dt

−R(t)R0

R recovery

= −βSI = βSI − γI = γI

• there will always be some susceptibles who escape infection • the chain of transmission eventually breaks due to the decline in infectives, not due to the lack of susceptibles

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Fraction of population infected S(t) = S(0)e−R(t)R0 S(∞) = 1 − R(∞) = S(0)e

−R(∞)R0

• solve this equation (numerically) for R(∞) = total proportion of population infected

initial slope = R0

R0 = 2

• outbreak: any sudden onset of infectious disease • epidemic: outbreak involving non-zero fraction of population (in limit N→∞), or which is limited by the population size

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

SIR with demography birth



Allow for births and deaths

-

assume each happen at a constant rate µ

R0 reduced to account for both recovery and mortality

β R0 = γ+µ

S infection

death

dS/dt dI/dt dR/dt

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

I

R recovery

death

death

= µ − βSI − µS = βSI − γI − µI

= γI − µR

Equilibria birth

dS/dt = dI/dt = dR/dt = 0 S

I infection



I I

(βS − (γ + µ)) = 0 =⇒ = 0 or

S

= (γ + µ)/β = 1/R0

Disease-free equilibrium

death

R recovery

death

death

dS/dt = µ − βSI − µS dI/dt = βSI − γI − µI

dR/dt = γI − µR

(S ∗ , I ∗ , R∗ ) = (1, 0, 0) •

Endemic equilibrium (only possible for R0>1):

1 µ 1 µ (S , I , R ) = ( , (R0 − 1), 1 − − (R0 − 1)) R0 β R0 β ∗



Wednesday, February 24, 2010



Endemic equilibrium 1 µ 1 µ (S , I , R ) = ( , (R0 − 1), 1 − − (R0 − 1)) R0 β R0 β ∗





R0 = 5

Wednesday, February 24, 2010



Pool of fresh susceptibles enables infection to be sustained



To establish equilibrium, must have each infective productive one new infective to replace itself



S = 1/R0

Vaccination • minimum size of susceptible population needed to sustain epidemic

ST = γ/β =⇒ R0 = S/ST • vaccination reduces the size of the susceptible population • immunizing a fraction p reduces R0 to: i R0

(1 − p)S = = (1 − p)R0 ST

• critical vaccination fraction is that required to reduce R0 < 1

1 pc = 1 − R0

“herd immunity”

alternatively, pc needed to drive endemic equilibrium to I*=0:

1 µ 1 µ ∗ ∗ ∗ (S , I , R ) = ( , (R0 − 1), 1 − − (R0 − 1)) R0 β R0 β Wednesday, February 24, 2010

K&R, Fig. 8.1

Suggest Documents