electric scooter wheelchairs with handlebars), 4 M-Cars. (a micro EV production vehicle in the same class as the. SV) and one low-floor bus for transporting ...
MOBILITYFORTHEELDERLY
MOBILITY DEVICES FOR THE ELDERLY – “Silver Vehicle” Feasibility –
MinoruKAMATA
MotokiSHINO
Professor Lecturer SchoolofEngineering,UniversityofTokyo SchoolofEngineering,UniversityofTokyo Tokyo,JapanTokyo,Japan (ReceivedJanuary4,2006)
Theauthorsproposetheuseofmicro-electricvehiclescalled“silvervehicles”(SV)asmobilitydevicesforolderdriverswho havedifficultydrivingautomobiles.Previousreportshavedescribedresearchoncharacteristicsoftheelderly,proposedtheSVconcept and evaluated it in townmobility field tests.This report addresses feasibility of the SV concept and issues of town planning throughafollow-upstudyofcharacteristicsoftheelderlythreeyearslater,long-termin-usetestingofSV-comparableproductionvehicles,andinvestigationsofelderlydrivercharacteristicsandtrailingbehaviorinmixedtrafficsituations. KeyWords: Olderdrivers,Mobility,Micro-electricvehicles,Transportation,Townplanning
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH
Morethan20%oftheJapanesepopulationis65or over, with the number increasing and certain to exceed 25%by2015.Thenotionofanagingpopulationconjures imagesofanincreaseddemandfornursingcarebutthe ratioofthoserequiringsuchcareisactuallylow–thereare many“activeseniors.”Qualitylivingconditions,among which mobility is of particular importance, are critical forenablingthehealthyelderlytoleadactivelives. Untilnowtheelderlyhavegenerallybeenconsideredvulnerableroadusers,fewofwhomwerelicensedto driveautomobiles.Asthenumberofelderlydriversgrows, however, traffic accidents become a more pronounced problemandtheissueofwhentogiveupdrivingmore important. Because issues of dementia compound the physical deterioration that accompanies aging, and becausegivingupdrivingcanmeangivingupindependent living,acomprehensiveapproachisrequiredthatconsidersbothalternativemeansoftransportationandmodificationstothelivingenvironment. Against this backdrop, the authors have proposed analternativemobilitydeviceforusebytheelderlywhen drivingordinaryautomobilesbecomesachallenge,and conductedvariousrelatedstudiessuchasfieldtestsrelatingtotownplanning.Sucheffortsaredetailedinprevious reports1-4, while this report describes the authors’ subsequentefforts.
2.1 Characteristics of the elderly and functional requirementsoftheirmobilitytools1 Tolookattheissueofelderlymobilityandtransportationinregionswithpooraccesstopublictransportation,weconductedaninvestigationofthecharacteristics of41elderlyresidentsofTTowninAkitaPrefecture.The investigationwasdividedintothreesections:alifesituationinterview,evaluationbyaphysicaltherapist,anda testofdrivingskillsusingbothactualvehiclesandpersonalcomputers.BecausedetailscanbefoundinReference 1 they are omitted here, but we observed trends consistentwithanaveragediminishingofabilitydueto agingaswellassomeotherspecificcharacteristics.These were used to define the following seven functional requirementsofmobilitydevicesappropriateforusebythe elderly: • Slowspeedof20to30km/h; • Easeingettinginandout; • Easeofoperation; • Verysmallsizeforeaseinhandling; • Driversupportsystems; • Short-rangeapplication;and • Safe,comfortabletransportationenvironment.
52
IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
2.2 Proposingthe“silvervehicle”conceptandevaluatingaprototype2 Thefunctionalrequirementsfromtheprevioussec-
MOBILITYDEVICESFORTHEELDERLY–“SilverVehicle”Feasibility–
tionwereappliedtovehicledesign,andanewtypenamed “silvervehicle”(SV)wasproposed.Basicspecifications wereidentified,theircharacteristicsandsignificancediscussedandtheconceptdefinedasrealizableintheform ofamicro-electricvehicle.Aprototype(picturedinFigure1)wasproducedthatcouldberegisteredasroad-legalintheclassoffour-wheeledmotorizedvehiclesnot exceeding50cc.Thebodydesignwasnewbuttheuseof anoff-the-shelfmotormeantcertainfunctionalityobjectiveswerenotachieved.ThevehiclewastakentoTTown and evaluated in comparative tests with other vehicles (regularautomobiles,low-speedvehicles[LSV]fromthe USA,four-wheeledscootersnotexceeding50cc).Tests were performed twice, with gear ratio adjustments and other operability improvements made between tests. Roughlytenelderlytestsubjectsevaluatedthevehicles on a test course with generally positive results. There wereproblemswithadjustingtothepedal-lessoperation oftheprototypevehicleaswellasdissatisfactionwithits partiallyenclosedbodydesigninacoldweatherregion, butsupportfortheconceptwasdeterminedtobehigh. 2.3 Townmobilityfieldtestsandtownplanning3,4 TownmobilityisaJapaneseversionofGreatBritain’soft-implementedshopmobilityscheme.Theauthors conductedfieldtestscombiningtownmobilitywiththeir “silvervehicle”asawaytostimulatelocalgovernments and citizens to think together about ease of mobility. Tests were conducted over a period of three days with roughly100participantsusing12“seniorcars”(6km/h electricscooterwheelchairswithhandlebars),4M-Cars (amicroEVproductionvehicleinthesameclassasthe SV)andonelow-floorbusfortransportingparticipants. Elderly participants without driver licenses were delivered from their homes to the electric wheelchair rental locationeitherbyfamilyorfriendsorusingourlow-floor
Fig.1Silvervehicleprototype
M.KAMATA,M.SHINO
bus,andfromthereusedtheelectricwheelchairstomove freely around the town center. To better mimic an SV ownership scenario, elderly participants with driver licensespickeduptheirM-Carsataspotoutsidethetown center,andfromtheredroveafewkilometersintotown todotheirshoppingandotheractivities.Imagesfromthe fieldtestarepresentedinFigures2and3.Abroadrange ofevaluationswassolicited,includingtheopinionsoflocalgovernment,otherroadusersandshopkeepersaswell asparticipants.Manypositivecommentswerereceived concerning the SV concept. In addition, four monitors participatedinalong-termM-Carfieldtesttoexperience the difference between ordinary automobiles and SVcomparablevehicles.
3. FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ELDERLY The evaluation of characteristics of the elderly mentionedinSection2representedtestsubjectcharacteristicsatagivenpointintime.Tolookattheimpactof agingrequirescollectingdataoverthecourseoftime.To thisend,weconductedafollow-upstudythreeyearsafterourinitialinvestigation.Duetovariousconstraintsthe
Fig.2Townmobilityfieldtest:electricscooters
Fig.3Townmobilityfieldtest:microEVs IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
53
MOBILITYFORTHEELDERLY
investigation covered a limited range of topics and includedonly24participants(plus10questionnaire-only respondents),butdidsucceedingainingdataforthesame individuals as three years earlier. Topics addressed includedalifestylesurvey,twotypesofreaction-timemeasurements, and physical characteristics (walking speed, standinglongjump,andtimebalancingononeleg).Longerinterviewsessionswerescheduledinordertocover anychangesinlifesituationoverthepreviousthreeyears. Among the 24 participants, 11 were in their 60s, 11 in their70sand2intheir80s,while14weremenand10 were women. Results for walking speed and reaction timearesummarizedinFigures4,5and6. Measurementswereconductedthesamewayasin Reference1.Walkingspeedwasmeasuredbytheamount of time it took to walk 20m at a normal pace. “Simple reactiontime”wasmeasuredbytimeelapsedbetweena
changeonthescreenandwhentheparticipantpresseda switch in response; “reaction time with decision” requiredparticipantstopressdifferentswitchesdepending on the color of the change. The results generally confirmed a trend toward decreased ability with aging (ascending lines over three years) but also included some counterexamples.Whilesomeparticipantsshowedspeed improvementsafterbeginningregularexercisetomaintaintheirhealth,orhadexercisedusingindoortreadmills purchasedtocompensateforthelackofoutdoorexercise duringthesnowymonths,forothersillnesshadledtoa marked reduction in venturing outs. Most subjects reportedlittlechangeintheirlivesoverthepreviousthree yearsalthoughtherewere3instancesofretirementand4 instancesofachangeinfamilystructure.Mostalsoreportedlittlechangeintheirautomobiledrivingpractices although3reportedmakingfewerlongtripsforshopping
30 2000 Men 1997 Men
25
2000 Women 1997 Women
Time (Seconds)
20
15
10
5
0 40
45
50
55
60
65 Age (Years)
70
75
80
85
80
85
90
Fig.4Timerequiredtowalk20m 1600 Licensed
1400
Unlicensed
Time (ms)
1200
Disabled
1000 800 600 400 200 0
40
45
50
55
60
65 70 Age (Years)
Fig.5Simplereactiontime
54
IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
75
90
M.KAMATA,M.SHINO
MOBILITYDEVICESFORTHEELDERLY–“SilverVehicle”Feasibility–
1600 Licensed
1400
Unlicensed
Time (ms)
1200
Disabled
1000 800 600 400 200 0
40
45
50
55
60
65 70 Age (Years)
75
80
85
90
Fig.6Reactiontimewithdecision
orpleasureand1actuallyreportedincreasedautomobile useduetoadeclineinlegstrength.Aftertestrunsand evaluationoftheprototype,amajorityofparticipantsindicated they would purchase an SV, which was only at the concept level during the earlier investigation, as an alternativetotheautomobileifthecostwerelow.Many felt,however,thattheydidnotwanttouseelectricscooters while they could still walk because doing so made themappeartobethefrailandold. Amongthe41subjectsoftheoriginalinvestigation, only 34 were available to participate in the follow-up study (including 10 questionnaire-only respondents). Reasonsfornon-availabilityincluded3deathsaswellas cases of institutionalization and change of address.We realizedboththatcharacteristicsoftheelderlyaredifficulttotreatcollectivelyduetotheinfluenceofindividual circumstances and also that undertaking such studies overtimeisitselfnoeasytask.
4. TOWN PLANNING AND MOBILITY DEVICES Characteristicsoftheelderlyvary,asdoresidential areasandthelocationoftownfacilitiesandshops.Variousmobilitydevicesexistfordifferenttypesofpeople, includingself-drivenautomobiles,SVs,bicycles,handlebar-type electric wheelchairs and public transportation servicessuchasbusesandtaxis.Ideally,mobilityoptions
would be provided for all combinations in accordance withregionalandindividualconditions. Town planning proposals include “pedestrian-life towns”and“compactcities,”andoftenpromotetheelimination of automobile use for environmental reasons. Givenpopulationsize,numberofstoresanddistribution issuesthereissurelyaneedforvariousmobilitydevices andtransportationsdevices,andourgoalhereistolook at how to match population characteristics with town characteristics. Table1categorizestheelderlybybroadcharacteristics. Some might argue that more refined categorizationsarecalledfor,butourcategoriesarebroadinlight oftherelationshipwithmobilitydevices.Table2categorizesvariousresidentialareas.Notethatalthoughspecific distancesaregiventheyareforreferenceonlyandshould beunderstoodasapproximate. Combining these categories allows the design of regionalmobilityandtransportationschemesandappropriateroadsystems.Thereisrelativefreedominmaking combinationswhencreatinganentirelynewcitysuchas SunCityintheUSA,butplanningisextremelydifficult when there is an existing town and people live on land their ancestors have occupied for generations. Strong leadership will be required from public administrations that hope to prepare for the hyper-aged society of the future.Thekeypointisdetermininghowmuchthetrans-
Table1Categoriesoftheelderly A:Unabletowalk,orabletowalk onlyafewdozenmeters.
Difficultyinventuringouttowalkevenwithawalker.Requiresawheelchair(with attendant)orelectricscooter.
B:Abletowalk100to200meters.
Abletowalkbutnotforlongdistances.Requiresplacestorestwhenwalking.Couldgo asfaras1kmindependentlywiththehelpofanSVorelectricscooter.
C:Abletowalk300metersormore.
Activeseniorcapableofwalkingorbicyclingfreelyinsurroundingareas.Couldgofurther withthehelpofanSV.
IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
55
MOBILITYFORTHEELDERLY
Table2Categoriesofresidentialareas a:TownCenter (Withina200mradiusoftownoffice, shopping,hospital)
Areas where shopping and hospital visits are generally within walking distance. “Pedestrian-life town planning” envisions conducting one’s life within such an area. Walkingortheuseofelectricscootersissufficient.
b:CentralArea (Areasurroundinga.1kmradiusof center.)
Areaswithmanycurrentresidentsfromwhichactiveseniorscanaccessthetowncenter onfootorbybicycle,butwhicharetoofarforanelectricscooter.Couldbesupplemented bySVsforpersonalindependentmobilityorpublictransportationsuchasloopbuses.
c:NeighboringArea (2-3kmradiusofcenter.)
Also has many current residents but automobile transport is a prerequisite. Public transportation(buses)isunprofitableandrunsinfrequentlysoprivatecarsplayacentral role. Possible realization of “compact city” ideal if able to shake free of automobile dependenceandpromotelifezonetownplanning.
d:SurroundingArea (5-10kmradiusofcenter.)
Numerous communities located a considerable distance from the town center. Elderly unabletouseprivateautomobilesareataserousdisadvantage.Inabilitytosecurepersonal mobilitywillmakeitdifficultfortheelderlytoremaininthecommunityinthefuture.
portationsystemwillrelyontheautomobile;thelow-environmental impact and small-size of the SV offers an alternativenotonlytoordinaryautomobilesforeldermobilitybetweenthetowncenterandneighboringareasbut alsoforwithin-areatransportationofeverybody.Various challengestotheadoptionofmicro-electricvehiclessuch astheSVaretakenupinsubsequentsections.
5. COMPATIBILITY OF MICRO-ELECTRIC VEHICLES EffortstodatehavedemonstratedthattheSVconceptproposedbytheauthorshasastructureandcharacteristics suited for use by the elderly and confirmed its utilityintownmobilityfieldtestsofcomparableproduction vehicles. These production vehicles are known as under 50cc mini-cars and are sold in the thousands by multiplemanufacturers. The authors believe such micro-EVs are suitable forwithin-areamobilitynotonlybytheelderlybutbyall, andthatprovidingasafedrivingenvironmentforthem couldpositionthemasanimportantuniversaldesignmobilitydeviceforuseintownplanning. Tothisend,weaddressedthefollowingconcerns, whichremainedafteroureffortsinTTown,intestsusing SV-comparable production C-Cars in J Town, Ibaraki Prefecture: • Acceptabilityamongthoseotherthantheelderly. • Drivingcharacteristicsoftheelderly. • Compatibilitywiththeroadenvironment. 5.1 Long-termusetests Whilefourmonitorsparticipatedinthelong-term use testing of SV-compatible vehicles at T Town, in J Town 18 monitors (including the non-elderly) used the vehiclesforperiodsoftwoweekseach,recordingboth
56
IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
usageandwhenthevehicleswerecharged.JTownislocatedtothenorthofHCity,whichhasapopulationof 200,000,andcanbedividedintoatowncenterstretching overafewkilometersandamountainousareatothewest. Mostdailyerrandscanbeaccomplishedatsupermarkets and the like in town but many residents also travel to mega-storesalongthenationalroadortoHCityabout 10kmaway.MonitordetailsarepresentedinTable3.The fourC-Cars(Figure7)usedbymonitorswereprovided bytheirmanufacturer. No restrictions were established for the tests and somemonitorsrantheirvehiclesatspeedsofupto45km/ h,usedthemtoaccessneighboringcitiesanddrovethem onthenationalroadsurroundedbylargetrucks.Figure8 summarizesusageresults.Mostmonitorsfelttherewere noproblemswithC-Carfunctionalitysuchasacceleration or maximum speed for operation within the area. Drivingrangebetweenchargeswasaround10to40km andonemonitorattainedamaximumspeedof48km/h. Concernaboutrunningoutofelectricitytendedtolead monitors to recharge early but there were no problems even with round-trips to neighboring towns. Also, althoughJTownishillytherewerenoproblemsrunning 30kmadayonanovernightcharge.Usinginexpensive nighttimeelectricityrenderedaveryeconomicalelectricTable3C-Cartestmonitors Age
Male
Female
Total
30s
5
0
5
40s
5
3
8
50s
1
1
2
60s
1
0
1
70s
1
0
1
80s
1
0
1
Total
14
4
18
M.KAMATA,M.SHINO
MOBILITYDEVICESFORTHEELDERLY–“SilverVehicle”Feasibility–
Fig.7C-CartestinginJTown FrequencyofUse
Monitors
Objective
Monitors
Daily
5
Commuting
7
4-5times/week
7
Shopping
11
2-3times/week
6
Shortdrive
5
1time/week
0
Tourism
0
Leisure
1
Hospital
1
Delivery
1
Work
1
Other
1
Avg.Daily RunningDistance
Monitors
Lessthan10km
9
10to24km
6
25to39km
3
40kmormore
0
driverswereaskedtodriveboththeirownautomobiles andtheC-Carsalongthesamecoursewithoutotherrestriction. Driving was recorded using four cameras onboardtheC-Cars(forward,rear,driverandspeedometer) as well as by staff in a following vehicle. The driving coursewasaroughly5kmlooponpublicroadsinJTown, asshowninFigure9.Fivesectionsofthecoursemarked either 30km/h or 40km/h were selected for behavioral analysis.Figure10presentsanexampleofthevideodata recorded while Table 4 summarizes our findings. All subjectsshowedlittlespeeddifferencebetweenthetwo vehiclesonthe30km/hsectionsoftheroads.Onthe40km/ hsections,however,subjectstendedtoexceedthespeed limitwhendrivingtheirowncarsbuttodriveatthelimit whenoperatingtheC-Cars.Inpost-testinterviewssubjects indicated an increase in stress when driving the CCars at greater than 40km/h. Regarding lane position, bothvehiclesweredrivensuchthatthedriver’sposition withrespecttotheroadwasroughlythesame:owncars werepositionedslightlytotheleftwhiletheone-seater
Fig.8C-Cartestresults
ity charge of 1 yen/km. Many monitors were also impressedwiththelowtaxesandotherrunningcostsofan under-50ccvehicle(roughlyone-eighththatofanstandard automobile). Monitors also offered other positive assessments,suchasthatitfeltgoodtodriveanenvironmentallyfriendlyelectricvehicle,thatthevehicleswere completelysatisfactorywhenconsideredanevolutionof a motorcycle rather than an automobile, that they were morestableanddrovebetterthanexpected,andthatthey handled well. At the same time, negative opinions includedthefearofrolloversduetothenarrowbodywidth, the feeling that for the same price a light automobile would be more substantial, and dissatisfaction with the short range. Perhaps because of the close association withmotorcycles,nooneexpressedconcernaboutsafety intheeventofacollision. 5.2 Evaluationofdrivingbytheelderly To investigate how the elderly drive SV-compatible vehicles in a general traffic environment, 4 elderly
Fig.9Courseforevaluatingdrivingcharacteristics
Fig.10Videoimages(C-Car) IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
57
MOBILITYFORTHEELDERLY
Table4Drivingspeedofelderlydrivers Course Segment
SubjectA: OwnCar
SubjectA: C-Car
SubjectB: OwnCar
SubjectB: C-Car
SubjectC: OwnCar
SubjectC: C-Car
SubjectD: OwnCar
SubjectD: C-Car
1
30+
30+
40-
30+
40
40-
30
30
2
40+
30+
40+
40
50
40+
40
40
3
40-
30+
40+
40
50
40
35
35
4
50-
30+
40
40
50
40+
40-
40
5
50
40+
40+
40+
50
40+
40+
40
C-Carswerepositionedtowardthecenter.Thissuggestedthatdriverbehaviorwasbasedonlongyearsofdriving experience rather than on an adjustment for the vehicle’swidth. Althoughthesamplewaslimited,theresultsfrom bothTTownandJTownsuggestthereislittleproblem withthewayelderlydriversoperateSVsintown.SubjectstendedtodriveSVssafelyeveninareaswherethey tended to speed when driving their own automobiles, suggestingahighlevelofSVreceptivity. 5.3 Compatibilitywithroadenvironment BecauseSVsarepositionedaslow-speedvehicles, howtointegratethemintomixedtrafficwithgeneralvehiclesisakeyissue.Theoriginalconceptwastoreduce the speed limit for all roads within the area to around 30km/htocreateacommunityzonebutthereisagreat dealofresistancetoloweringthespeedlimitforapplicationinexistingtowns.InJTown,therefore,wedecided toinvestigatetheimpactofslow-speedoperationonthe behaviorofothertraffic. Tests recording the behavior of trailing vehicles wereconductedonthreesectionsofthecoursedescribed intheprevioussection.TestconditionsweretohaveeithertheC-Caroravandriveatasteady20,30and40km/ h(plus,fortheC-Car,drivingtowardtheleftsideofthe laneat30km/h)andtotakeavideorecordofhowtrailing vehiclesbehaved.14runsweremadewiththeC-Carand 7forthevan.Figure11summarizestherateatwhichthe C-Carwaspassed.At20km/halmostalltrailingvehicles passedthetestvehiclewhileat40km/h(thespeedlimit) almostnonedid.At30km/hmosttrailingvehiclespassed thetestvehiclewhenitwaspositionedtotheleftsideof thelanebutonlyaminoritydidsowhenitwaspositioned tothecenter.Thevan,however,waspassedonlyonceat 30km/h,andotherwisewasnotpassedevenwhentravelingat20km/h. Theabovesuggeststhatordinaryautomobilesfind 20km/htobetooslowbutwillfollowbehindratherthan passat30km/hifconditionsareunfavorableforpassing.
58
IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
Passingrate[–]
Fig.11Resultsofpassingbehaviortest
Accordingly,itseemsreasonabletoestablishalow-speed areaof30km/hasanappropriateenvironmentforSVsto operateinmixedtraffic.Inaddition,undertestconditions theexistenceofintersectionsandtrafficlightsmeantthat changingvehiclespeeddidnotresultinadifferenceof 150%fortotalelapsedtime.
6. DISCUSSIONS We conducted various investigations of the lifestylesandphysicalcharacteristicsoftheelderlyandtheir means of mobility. With the exception of urban areas withdevelopedpublictransportationnetworks,problems ofpublictransportationavailabilityandaccidentsamong older drivers make living in surrounding areas difficult for the elderly. Local community bus services, except whenplannedandoperatedcarefullyinareaswitharelativelydensepopulationofusers,canbecomeanunderusedwasteofsubsidyfunding.Inlightofthissituation,it isimportantthattheelderlyliveascloseaspossibleto thetowncenterandhavemeansofmobilityavailablethat aresuitedtotheirphysicalcharacteristics.Thosecapable ofdrivingautomobileswithoutaproblemcancontinue doingsobutpreparingalow-speedenvironmentwould increasethemarginofsafetyforSVandprovideanincentivetoshifttosuchvehicles.Thoseforwhomdriving automobiles has become difficult can live in the town
M.KAMATA,M.SHINO
MOBILITYDEVICESFORTHEELDERLY–“SilverVehicle”Feasibility–
center free of dependence on automobiles or live in a neighboring area accessible to the town center by lowspeedSVs.Thosewhohavegivenupdrivingordonot haveadriverslicensewouldchoosetomoveonfoot,by bicycle or by electric scooter in accordance with their physical characteristics, but transportation by bus from neighboringareasmightalsobepossiblewheretherewas significantdemand.IntroducingDRTwouldalsoenable morefinelytunedservice. Intermsoftownplanning,ensuringtherearereasonstoventureoutandthemeanstodosoareimportant partsofensuringactivelivesfortheelderly.Therefore,if shopsandhospitalsandotherfacilitiesarelocatedinthe centralareatheelderlymusteitherliveinthesurrounding area or be provided with means of access. Current meansofaccessincludetheuseofprivatevehiclesorbus services (including taxis). Nevertheless, given the increasingagingofsociety,thereisaneedtocomeupwith ways of operating buses that do not require excessive public support. The creation of “compact cities” with low-speedareasisonepossiblesolution. Allfunctionsnecessaryfordailylifecouldbelocatedinaroughly2kmradiusofthetowncenterwithin whichallroadsexcepttrunkroadswouldcarrymixedSV and regular automobile traffic traveling at low speeds. CreatingdifferentialparkingpoliciesforregularautomobilesandSVscouldencouragetheswitchtoSVsandimprove the environment. Finally, SVs can be used as mobilitydevicesbytheable-bodiedaswellastheelderly.
7. CONCLUSIONS We looked at the lifestyles and mobility environmentsoftheelderlyinsmallregionalcitiesdependenton automobileuseandpoorlyservedbypublictransportation.Ourfindingscanbesummarizedasfollows: Basedonpreviousreports: • Privateautomobilesarealifenecessityevenfortheelderlybutdecliningabilitiesbringthefearofaccidents. • Those leading active lives through the use of private vehiclesscorebetterforphysicalcharacteristicsthan thosewithoutlicenseswhorarelyventureout. • The“silvervehicle”(SV),aone-seatermicro-electric vehiclewithamaximumspeedofabout30km/h,was proposedasasafeandcomfortablemobilitydevicefor theelderly. • EvaluationtestingoftheSVwasbroadlysupportiveof theconceptbutthereisaneedtoprepareanenviron-
mentwherelow-speedvehiclescanoperatesafelyand comfortably. Basedonthecurrentreport: • A follow-up investigation of the elderly three years laterrevealedlittlechangeinthelivesofmostbutdid revealamaterialdeclineinresponsetimeandtheneed toencourageself-awarenessofsame. • To lead active lives, the elderly require not only a meansofmobilitybutalsoaplacetoliveandreasons toventureout–issuesthatmustbeaddressedfroma townplanningperspective. • Tests using SV-compatible production vehicles demonstratedtheSVtobeaviablemeansoftransportation forthenon-elderly,aswell,andapossibleenvironmentallyfriendlytransportationtoolforwithin-areause. • Applyinga30km/hspeedlimitonallroadsotherthan trunkroadsseemstoestablishadrivingenvironment inwhichSVscanoperatesafelyinmixedtraffic.Additional safety risk management studies are required butthesuccessof“communityzones”adoptedinvariouslocationssuggeststhatmicroelectricvehicles,in combinationwiththelow-speedcommunityareaconcept,offeraneffectivemeansofaccessfortheelderly andotherarearesidents.
REFERENCES 1. M.Kamata,N.FujiiandT.Akiyama.StudyonHumanFriendly VehicleUsableforElderlyPeople.(1stReport:Investigation onPhysicalCharacteristicsandLifeStyleofElderlyPeople, andDiscussionofUserNeedsforVehicleDesign).“Trans. JSME”68-665C:pp.220–227.(2002).(inJapanese). 2. M.Kamataetal.StudyonHumanFriendlyVehicleUsablefor ElderlyPeople(2ndReport:Proposalof“SilverVehicle”Concept,andEvaluationofitsProtoType).“Trans.JSME”68669C:pp.1487–1494.(2002).(inJapanese). 3. M.Kamataetal.StudyonHumanFriendlyVehicleUsablefor Elderly People (3rd Report: Evaluation of“SilverVehicle” Concept byTown-Mobility Experiment).“Trans JSME” 68669C:pp.1495–1502.(2002).(inJapanese). 4. M.Kamata,N.FujiiandT.Akiyama.Proposalof“SilverVehicle” ConceptanditsApplicationforActualTowntoIncreaseMobilityofElderly.Proceedings,2ndConferenceofAssociationtowardCaringSocietyforAll.pp.15–18.(1999).(inJapanese).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Theauthorsexpresstheirdeepgratitudeforthegenerous supportprovidedintheconductofthisresearchbythethencurrentAraco,Inc.andbytheTownOfficesofTakanosu,AkitaPrefectureandJuo,IbarakiPrefecture.
IATSSRESEARCHVol.30No.1,2006
59