modelling and experimental validation of a fluidized bed reactor ... - Core

0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
A model for natural gas-air mixture combustion in fluidized beds is proposed,. 19 counting ... The reactor is equipped with a perforated plate distributor of 1.8. 62.
* Revised Manuscript

MODELLING AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR FREEBOARD REGION: APPLICATION TO NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

S. DOUNIT , M. HEMATI *, R. ANDREUX Laboratoire de Génie Chimique, U.M.R 5503, ENSIACET, 05 rue Paulin Talabot, 31106 Toulouse - France. ABSTRACT

11

A theoretical and experimental study of natural gas-air mixture combustion in a

12

fluidized bed of sand particles is presented. The operating temperatures are lower than a

13

critical temperature of 800 °C above which the combustion occurs in the vicinity of the

14

fluidized bed. Our study focusses on the freeboard zone where most of the methane

15

combustion takes place at such temperatures. Experimental results show the essential role of

16

the projection zone in determining the global thermal efficiency of the reactor. The dense bed

17

temperature, the fluidizing velocity and the mean particle diameter significantly affect the

18

thermal behaviours.

19

A model for natural gas-air mixture combustion in fluidized beds is proposed,

20

counting for interactions between dense and dilute regions of the reactor [Pré et al. (1998)]

21

supplemented with the freeboard region modelling of Kunii-Levenspiel (1990). Thermal

22

exchanges due to the convection between gas and particles, and due to the conduction and

23

radiation phenomena between the gas-particle suspension and the reactor walls are counted.

24

The kinetic scheme for the methane conversion is that proposed by Dryer and Glassman

25

(1973). Model predictions are in good agreement with the measurements.

26

Keywords: Fluidization, Combustion, Natural gas, Model, Freeboard

27

I: INTRODUCTION.

28

Fluidized bed combustors have many advantages, including their simplicity of

29

construction, their flexibility in accepting solid, liquid or gaseous fuel, and their high

30

combustion efficiency at low temperatures what minimises NOX generation [Foka et al.

31

(1994)]. Fluidized bed natural gas combustors are used in many industrial applications such as

32

incineration of sludge with high moisture content or solid particles calcination. Given the

33

ecological benefit of using natural gas in fluidized bed furnaces, it is of interest to describe the

34

combustion process in fluidized beds using experimental and theoretical approaches.

35

Natural gas combustion mechanisms in fluidized beds have been widely investigated

36

at bed temperatures greater than a critical temperature close to 800 °C [Dounit et al. (2001),

37

Pré et al. (1998), Pré-Goubelle (1997), Van Der Vaart (1992), Yanata et al. (1975), Baskakov

38

and Makhorin (1975)], above which the methane conversion is fully realized in the dense

39

zone. Sadilov and Baskakov (1973) reported temperatures measured in the bubble eruption

40

zone above the bed surface greater than the theoretical flame temperature. At bed

41

temperatures lower than this critical temperature, the combustion of methane is mainly

42

realized in the freeboard zone. In such conditions, the methane bubble eruption in the lean

43

phase of the fluidized bed induces high exploding risks [Dounit et al. (2001)]. Thus, low

44

temperature reacting fluidized bed applications require experiments for safety reasons. In such

45

a way, hydrodynamics and thermal phenomena occurring in the freeboard region of fluidized

46

bed reactors must be investigated and modelled.

47

However, there is a lack of references in the literature on the experimental and

48

theoretical study of the reacting fluidized bed dilute region. Indeed, previous works were

49

either room temperature hydrodynamic studies [Wen and Chen (1982), Fournol et al. (1973),

50

Zenz and Weil (1958), Kunii and Levenspiel (1990), George and Grace (1978)] or isothermal

51

catalytic chemical studies.

52

In this paper, hydrodynamics and thermal phenomena coupling in the projection zone

53

of a fluidized bed operating in the bubbling regime is experimentally studied and modelled.

54

The natural gas combustion modelling proposed by Pré et al. (1998) is used to predict the

55

reactor dense region while the Kunii-Levenspiel modelling (1990) is used to describe the

56

freeboard region. The two-stage kinetic scheme of methane conversion proposed by Dryer

57

and Glassman (1973) is used. The resulting reactor model is validated using our experimental

58

data.

59

II: DESCRIPTION OF THE SET-UP.

60

The experimental set-up is given in Figure 1. The reactor consists of a heat resistant of

61

steel pipe 180 mm in diameter and 1400 mm high, with a disengaging section 360 mm in

62

diameter and 1000 mm high. The reactor is equipped with a perforated plate distributor of 1.8

63

% porosity. The bed temperature is controlled using cooling air flowing in a double shell. The

64

pneumatic valve what controls the air circuit feeding into the double shell is controlled by a

65

PID system equipped with a thermocouple located in the dense bed. Natural gas with 97 %

66

methane content is used as the combustible and premixed to the air in the windbox. The

67

reactor is fitted axially with chromel-alumel-type temperature sensors and water-cooled tubes

68

to sample the gas located at 50, 100, 250, 300, 400, 450, 550, 600, 650, 700, 900, 1000, 1100,

69

1200 and 1300 mm above the distributor. The sampling tubes are connected to a pump, a

70

cooling unit to eliminate water, infrared-type analysers to measure CH4, CO2, and CO mole

71

fractions, and a paramagnetic-type analyser for O2 measurements. Experiments safety is

72

ensured using (i) a burner placed in the wider section of the reactor what converts the

73

unburned gas exiting at the fluidized bed outlet (ii) a thermocouple placed in the windbox

74

connected to a PID regulator what cuts off the reactor feeding when the windbox temperature

75

reaches a critical value chosen well below the air-methane auto-burning temperature.

76

The studied operating conditions are presented in Table 1. Typical sand particles with

77

a density of 2650 kg.m-3 and mean size ranging between 100 and 550 µm are fluidized. The

78

air factor, defined as the ratio of the volume of air fed into the reactor to the required volume

79

for stoichiometric combustion of methane, ranges between 1.0 and 1.5. The bed temperature,

80

Tbed, is defined to that measured 150 mm above the distributor. The fluidizing velocity ranges

81

between 2 and 4 times the minimum fluidizing velocity at 20 °C.

82

(Table 1).

83

III: EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS.

84

III.1: Typical experiment presentation.

85

C1 experiments (Table 1) are realized in permanent regime, with a dense bed

86

temperature ranging between 650 and 800 °C.

87

Temperature profiles.

88

The differences between the local temperature measured along the reactor axis and the

89

dense bed temperature, Tbed, are presented in Figure 2. An increase in the local temperature

90

characterizes the combustion zone, what moves towards the bed surface when increasing the

91

dense bed temperature . The combustion mainly takes place in the bed dense region when

92

dense bed temperature is higher than 800°C, what is consistent with previous observations

93

reported in the literature [Dounit (2001), Pré et al. (1998), Pré-Goubelle (1997)]. The local

94

temperature decreasing above the combustion zone is attributed to heat losses.

95

Pressure drop profiles.

96

The effect of the dense bed temperature, Tbed, on the normalized standard deviation of

97

σ the pressure drop fluctuations, Δ P , measured at different heights is presented in Figure 3.

98

The methane combustion occurs close to the bed surface when the dense bed temperature,

99

Tbed, reaches the critical value of 800 °C, and the resulting exploding of methane bubbles

100

reaching the bed surface induces an increase in the local pressure fluctuations. When

101

increasing the bed temperature above the critical temperature, Tbed, the local pressure

102

fluctuations decrease again. Such observations have ever been reported by Baskakov and

103

Makhorin (1975).

104

Reaction behaviour.

105

The freeboard region plays an important role in the combustion behaviour, especially

106

when the dense bed temperature is lower than the critical value of 800 °C. At a dense bed

107

temperature, Tbed, of 700 °C, the major part of the methane conversion is realized in the

108

freeboard region 400 mm above the dense bed surface, as underlined by the mole fraction of

109

the stable species (CH4, O2, CO2) measured along the reactor axis (Figure 4-a). The

110

progressive decreasing in the local methane mole fraction indicates that the natural gas

111

combustion process in the freeboard region of the reactor is a progressive process.

112

The bell shape of the CO mole fraction profile confirms the successive nature of the

113

methane combustion reaction with CO formation as an intermediate species (Figure 4-b). This

114

was already observed experimentally and modelled by several authors [Dryer and Glassman

115

(1973), Westbrook and Dryer (1981), Bradley et al. (1977)].

116

III.2: Effect of operating conditions.

117

The experiments are carried out at dense bed temperatures lower than the critical

118

temperature of 800 °C (Table 1). An increase in the excess air factor above 1.1 has little

119

influence on the process behaviour, both in the dense and dilute regions. The temperature and

120

the methane conversion profiles obtained at different excess air factors are very close to each

121

other (Dounit, 2001). On the other hand, an increase in the total mass of solids in the reactor

122

from 9 up to 15 kg has no significant effect on the reaction progress in the freeboard, since no

123

reaction occurs in the dense bed region at these low bed temperatures.

124

Superficial gas velocity effect.

125

Figures 5 and 6 present the temperature and the methane conversion measured along

126

the reactor axis at 700 °C. Three values of gas velocity are considered, respectively 2, 3 and 4

127

times Umf at 20 °C, corresponding to gas velocities ranging between 10.5 and 26 times U m f

128

at dense bed temperature. The combustion zone moves upwards from the bed level to the

129

outlet of the reactor when increasing the superficial gas velocity. This occurs because an

130

increase in the gas velocity leads to a decrease in the mean residence time of reactants in the

131

reactor, and also to an enhancement of the projection height of solid particles. These projected

132

particles contributes to the dilute phase temperature increasing and thus on the combustion.

133

Results obtained at bed temperatures lower than 750 °C were similar to those presented in this

134

section for 700 °C.

135

Mean particle diameter effect.

136

The effect of the mean particle diameter has been investigated between 100 and

137

550 µm (runs C1, C8 and C9 in Table 1). The superficial gas velocity was kept constant,

138

equivalent to twice the minimum fluidization velocity of particles 350 µm in diameter at 20

139

°C. Figure 7 presents the methane conversion as a function of the height at 700 °C for each

140

size of particles. Decreasing the mean particle diameter makes the combustion zone move

141

upwards to the reactor outlet, what is a consequence of the significant enhancement of two

142

parameters: the direct contact surface between gas and solid particles, and the particles hold-

143

up in the freeboard region, caused by an increase in the bubbles velocity and diameter at the

144

dense bed surface. At constant fluidizing velocity, decreasing the particle size leads to an

145

increase in the excess gas velocity ( U g − U m f ) what affects strongly the bubble size and

146

velocity. Similar behaviour was observed at the other dense bed temperatures tested in this

147

work.

148

IV: REACTOR MODEL.

149

The model for natural gas combustion process in the dense zone of the reactor is based

150

on the bubble assemblage model introduced by Kato and Wen (1969) what has been improved

151

to count for the thermal transfer that occurs during the combustion. It has ever been validated

152

at dense bed temperatures greater than 850 °C [Pré et al. (1998)]. The model is supplemented

153

with a freeboard modelling to count for the strong effects we experimentally evidenced of the

154

freeboard on the global bed combustion when the bed temperature Tbed is kept lower than the

155

critical temperature of 800 °C. The following assumptions are considered: I. The freeboard region is fed only by the gas contained in bubbles; the temperature and

156

composition of which are that of the bubble phase at the bed surface.

157 158

II. The projected particles originate from the bubble wakes. They are projected by

159

packets having initial velocities equal to the bubble rise velocity at the dense bed

160

surface. III. The particle projection by packets makes only a fraction of their total surface

161

accessible to gas. A contact efficiency factor is thus introduced.

162

IV. The entrained particle flux, the contact efficiency factor and the solid hold-up along

163

the freeboard fall exponentially from their values at the dense bed surface.

164

V. The gas phase and the particle phase flows are plug flows without and with back flow,

165

respectively.

166

VI. The freeboard region is subdivided into a number of elementary compartments.

167 168

IV.1: HEAT TRANSFER IN THE FREEBOARD.

169

The following mechanisms are counted in the modelling:

170

(4)

the gas-to-particle convection.

171

(5)

the gas-particle-suspension-to-reactor-wall conduction and radiation.

172

(6)

the particle-to-particle radiation.

173

As a first approximation, the radial heat transfer resistance is assumed to be located in a thin

174

film at the reactor wall.

175

The convective heat transfer coefficient between gas and solid particles is modelled

176

using the Ranz and Marshall’s correlation.

177

IV.1.1: Gas-particle suspension to reactor-wall transfer.

178

The model is similar to that proposed by Kunii and Levenspiel (1991) for the dense

179

region of the reactor. The heat flow exchanged between the gas-particle suspension and the

180

reactor wall is the sum of conductive and radiative contributions: q  q c  q re

181

(1)

182

Since the extinction coefficient (  p  1,5  f v   p d p ) is much higher than unity (3,85 for a

183

system with 1 % solid hold-up and 350 µm mean particle diameter), the gas-solid suspension

184

is considered as a grey surface as well as the reactor-wall. Thus, the radiative contribution can

185

be written:

186

qre 

  Tp4  Tw4  1 1  1 w g

(2)

187

where εg is the gas-particles suspension emissivity, what depends both on the emissivity of

188

the gas phase and the local particles concentration. Its value is estimated using the correlation

189

reported in the appendix.

190

The conductive contribution is governed by the conduction through a gas film near the reactor

191

wall. Its thickness can be estimated as Lg= d p / 2 . This contribution is expressed, according to

192

Kunii and Levenspiel, as :

193

194

qc 

kg Lg

 T p  T w 

(3)

IV.1.2: Axial radiative heat transfer between different regions of the freeboard.

195

Various experimental measurements have shown that when the natural gas combustion

196

occurs partially or totally in the freeboard zone, the temperature and the solid hold-up varies

197

continuously along the reactor axis [Dounit et al. (2001), Dounit (2001)]. These gradients

198

generate an axial radiative heat transfer which can significantly affect the chemical reaction.

199

An approach similar to that proposed by Bueters et al. (1974) was used in this work.

200

The freeboard zone is discretized into N compartments separated by virtual planes. The

201

radiative heat flux absorbed by each slice i of the freeboard and coming from all other

202

freeboard slices can be expressed as:

q tot i   gi  E i 1  E i 1  

203

j i  2 j 1



N



j i  2

204



j

  gi 

  1    j 1

k  i 1

gk



(4)

j 1    E j   gi   1   gk  k  i 1  

where Ej represents the radiative heat flow emitted in one direction by slice j:

Ej 

205

206



  E

1   gj    2  A  T j4 2

(5)

IV.2: HYDRODYNAMICS OF THE SYSTEM.

207

Modelling of natural gas combustion in the freeboard region of a fluidized bed reactor

208

necessitates prior knowledge of the solid hold-up and the flux of projected particles along this

209

region. In Table 2 we present the correlations used.

210

(Table 2).

211

IV.3 : MODEL EQUATIONS.

212

The mass balance is written for every principal species present in the gas phase (CH4,

213

O2, N2, H2O, CO, CO2, and NO) while the heat balances are established separately both for

214

gaseous and particulate phases (Table 3).

215

(Table 3). The model equations are solved in three steps:

216 217

I.

Initially the heat and mass balances for each compartment of the dense region are solved,

218 219

II.

Secondly, for each slice of the freeboard zone, the heat and mass balances are solved.

220

III.

Finally the global heat and mass balances for the entire reactor is checked.

221

The systems of equations obtained both for the dense and for the freeboard zones are

222

non-linear algebraic systems solved using the Newton-Raphson method. More details can be

223

found in Pré-Goubelle (1997) and Dounit (2001). From this procedure, we get the axial

224

profiles of different species mole fractions present in the gas stream and both gas and particle

225

temperatures profiles along the reactor. The heat loss due to conduction and radiation to

226

external medium can also be computed.

227

V: DISCUSSION OF THE MODEL RESULTS.

228

V.1: KINETIC SCHEME.

229

The kinetic schemes available of Dryer and Glassman (1973), Westbrook and Dryer

230

(1981), and Bradley et al. (1977) have been tested and compared to our experiments. The one

231

of Dryer and Glassman (1973) gives the best predictions. Only the results obtained with this

232

kinetics scheme are discussed here:

233

3 CH 4  O2  CO  2 H 2 O 2

(R1)

234

1 CO  O2  CO 2 2

(R2)

235

The rates of reactions R1 and R2 and the values of kinetic parameters involved are

236

reported in Table 4.

237

(Table 4).

238

At relatively low temperatures (less than 750 °C), good agreement has been obtained

239

for kinetic parameters giving the fastest reaction rate for methane transformation (n=13.4 and

240

E=197.768 kJ.mol-1), as shown in Figures 8 and 9. At dense bed temperatures closer to the

241

critical temperature of 800 °C, the best agreement was obtained for kinetic parameters of

242

methane transformation reaction closer to the mean values proposed by Dryer and Glassman

243

(n = 13 and E = 197.768 kJ.mol-1) as seen in Figures 10 and 11. Such modification in the

244

kinetics constant suggests that the mechanism of methane combustion does not occur only in

245

the homogeneous phase, and that sand particles may have a catalytic or inhibitive effect. This

246

is consistent with the previous experiments of Sotudeh-Gharebaagh (1998) showing a low

247

catalytic effect of sand particles at temperatures lower than 700°C, and an inhibitive effect at

248

temperatures between 750°C and 850°C.

249

(Figures 8, 9, 10 and 11).

250

V.2: EFFECT OF OPERATING PARAMETERS.

251

The excess air factor and the initial fixed bed height have a very weak effect on the

252

natural gas combustion process. The model matches well this observation (Dounit, 2001). The

253

strong effect of the gas superficial velocity and of the mean particle diameter is correctly

254

predicted by the model, as shown in Figure 12 at a dense bed temperature of 700 °C. In

255

addition, as shown in Figure 13, the measured mole fraction profiles are in good agreement

256

with the model predictions for different particles mean sizes.

257

(Figures 12 and 13).

258

VI: CONCLUSION.

259

In the present paper, a theoretical and experimental study of the influence of the

260

freeboard zone on the combustion of natural gas at temperatures lower than the critical

261

temperature have been presented. The experimental study demonstrates the progressive move

262

of the combustion zone towards the dense bed surface and thus into the interior of the dense

263

zone as the bed temperature rises. Increasing the fluidizing velocity or decreasing the mean

264

particle diameter induces the reaction zone displacement towards the reactor outlet. The

265

freeboard modelling combined with the dense bed modelling of Pré et al. (1998) predict

266

satisfactorily the reactor behaviour for different operating conditions. At dense bed

267

temperatures lower than the critical temperature, the methane burning is not an exploding

268

phenomenon mainly because of the existence of projected particles. The combustion occurs

269

progressively in the freeboard region and the conversion is total at the reactor outlet. Thus,

270

from a practical point of view, it seems necessary to use coarse particles with mean gas

271

velocities around 12 times the minimum fluidization velocity to ensure achievement of the

272

whole reaction in the reactor and to reach the maximum thermal efficiency of the reactor. The

273

fluidized bed reactor model gives useful information regarding the thermal efficiency of the

274

operation and permits estimation of the conditions at which the reactor efficiency is

275

maximum.

276

APPENDIX.

277

The gas-particle suspension emissivity  g is computed according to the following correlation:

 g   p  Cs   g

278

(A1)

279

where  g and  p are respectively the emissivity of gas and particles. CS is a factor depending

280

on the gas and solid emissivity, mean diameter and concentration of solid particles.

281

The particles emissivity is computed, for coarse particles, according to the following

282

correlation:

283

   p  1  exp  1,5  f v  L d  p  

(A2)

284

where L is the characteristic length.

285

The gas emissivity is calculated using the emissivity of absorbent gas (CO2 and H2O) given

286

by the Hottel correlation :

287

 H  C CO   CO  C H O   H O   2

2

2

2

(A3)

288

and the use of a blackening factor FE in order to take into account the presence of species in

289

the gas stream other than CO2 and H2O:

290

 g  FE  1   H  FE

(A4)

291

In these correlations,  CO2 and  H 2O are the emissivity of carbon dioxide and water vapour,

292

respectively. C CO2 , C H 2O and  are factors depending on the partial pressure of gas species,

293

the gas temperature and the characteristic length. The blackening factor for the gas stream is

294

equal to 1.2 according to Bueters and al (1974).

295

NOTATION.

296

A

: reactor cross sectional area (m2).

297

Cps

: specific heat of particles (J.kg-1.k-1).

298

Ci

: concentration of species i in gas stream (mol.m-3).

299

Dr

: reactor diameter (m).

300

dhi

: height of compartments i (m).

301

dp

: mean particle diameter (m)

302

Ei

: heat flux emitted by radiation from slice i and originate from this slice in one direction. The total heat flux emitted being 2.Ei (W).

303 304

F

: flux of entrained particles (kg.m-2.s-1).

305

F0

: flux of entrained particles at dense bed surface (kg.m-2.s-1).

306

fv

: volume fraction of particles in each freeboard compartment.

307

fw

: bubbles volume fraction occupied by the wake.

308

h

: height above the bed surface (m).

309

hgp

: heat transfer coefficient by convection between gas and solid particles (W.m-2.k-1).

310

hpw

: heat transfer coefficient by conduction and radiation between the gas-particle suspension and reactor-walls (W.m-2.k-1).

311 312

Hi

: molar enthalpy of species i (J.mol-1).

313

kg

: gas phase conductivity (W.m-1.K-1).

314

L

: characteristic height of a freeboard compartment (m).

315

Lg

: gas film thickness (m).

316

qc

: heat flux exchanged by conduction between the gas-solid suspension and reactor walls (w.m-2).

317 318 319

qre

: heat flux exchanged by radiation between the gas-solid suspension and reactor walls (w.m-2).

320

qtot i

: heat flux absorbed by slice i and coming from all other regions per unit surface (w.m-2).

321 322

ri

: reaction rate for every gas species i (mol.m-3.s-1).

323

R

: reactor radius (m).

324

Tbed

: dense bed average temperature (k).

325

Tg

: gas temperature (k).

326

Tp

: particle temperature (k).

327

Tw

: reactor wall temperature (k).

328

Ug

: superficial gas velocity (ms-1).

329

Umf

: minimum fluidising velocity of solid particles (m.s-1).

330

Ui

: interstitial gas velocity (m.s-1).

331

yi

: mole fraction of species i in gas stream.

332

Z

: height above the gas distributor (m).

333

Greek letters.

334 335

Pi

: Mean pressure drop (Pa).

336

 mf

: dense bed voidage at minimum fluidising conditions.

337



: local freeboard voidage.

338

g

: gas-particles suspension emissivity.

339

w

: emissivity of reactor walls.

340

p

: particles emissivity

341



: gas-particle suspension density (kg/m3).

342

0

: gas-particle suspension density at bed surface (kg/m3).

343

s

: density of the particles (kg/m3).

344



: contact efficiency at height h.

345

bed

: contact efficiency at bed surface.

346



: Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67.10-8 w/m2.k4).

347

i

: Standard deviation of pressure drop fluctuations (Pa). Dimensionless numbers.

348

349

Reynolds number

Re 

350

Prandtl number

Pr 

[1]

 g  Cp g kg

Baskakov A.P., Makhorin K.E, (1975) "Combustion of natural gas in fluidized beds", Inst of Fuel symp. Series. 1 : Fluidized combustion, C3-1.

353 354

g

REFERENCES.

351 352

 g Ui  d p

[2]

Bradley D., Chin S. B., Draper M. S., Hakinson G., (1977) "Aerodynamic and flame

355

structure within a jet-stirred reactor", 16th Symp. On combustion, The combustion inst.,

356

Pittsburg, pp 1571.

357

[3]

Bueters K. A., Cogoli J. G., Habelt W. W., (1974) "Performance prediction of

358

tangentially fired utility furnaces by computer model", 15th Int. Symp. on combustion,

359

Tokyo, Japan.

360

[4]

Chen G. T., Shang J. Y., Wen C. Y., (1982) "Freeboard model for fluidized bed

361

combustors", In Fluidization Sci. and Tech., M. Kwauk and D. Kunii edns., Science

362

press, Beijing,

363

[5]

Dounit S., (2001) "Combustion du gaz naturel en réacteur à lit fluidisé : Etude

364

expérimentale et modélisation de la zone dense et de la zone de désengagement", Thèse

365

de Doctorat, INP-ENSICG, Toulouse.

366

[6]

Dounit S., Hémati M., Steinmetz D., (2001) "Natural gas combustion in fluidized bed

367

reactors between 600 and 850 °C: experimental study and modelling of the freeboard"

368

Powder Technology, 120 (1-2), pp 49-54

369

[7]

Symp. Int. On combustion, The comb. Inst. Pittsburg, pp 987.

370 371

[8]

374 375 376 377 378

Foka M., Chaouki J., Guy C., Klvana D., (1994)"Natural gas combustion in a catalytic turbulent fluidized bed", Chem. Eng. Sci. 49 (24A) pp 4261-4276.

372 373

Dryer F. L., Glassman I., (1973) "High temperature oxidation of CO and CH4", 14th

[9]

Fournol A. B., Bergougnou M. A., Baker C. G. J., (1973) "Solids entrainment in a large gas fluidized bed", Can. J. of Chem. Eng., 51 pp 401-404.

[10] George S. E., Grace J. R., (1978) "Entrainment of particles from aggregative fluidized beds", AIChE Symp. Series, 74, 176 pp 67-73. [11] Kato, K., Wen,C. Y., (1969) "Bubble assemblage model for fluidized bed catalytic reactor" , Chem. Eng. Sci., 24, pp 1351-1369.

379

[12] Kunii D., Levenspiel O., (1990) "Fluidized reactor models : 1. For bubbling beds of

380

fines, intermediate and large particles. 2. For the lean phase : Freeboard and fast

381

fluidization" Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 29, pp 1226-1234.

382 383 384 385

[13] Kunii D., Levenspiel O., (1991) "Fluidization engineering",2nd edition, Butterworth Heinenman, Boston. [14] Miyauchi T., (1974) "Concept for successive contact mechanism for catalytic reaction in fluid beds", J. of Chem. Eng. of Japan, 7 (3), pp 201-207.

386

[15] Pré-Goubelle P., (1997) "Contribution à l’étude expérimentale et à la modélisation de

387

la combustion du gaz naturel en réacteur à lit fluidisé", Thèse de Doctorat INP-

388

ENSIGC Toulouse.

389

[16] Pré, P., Hémati M. and Marchand B., (1998) "Study of natural gas combustion in

390

fluidized beds: modelling and experimental validation", Chem. Eng. Sci., 53 (16), pp

391

2871.

392

[17] Ranz W. E., Marshall W. R., (1952) Chem. Eng. Pogress, 48, 141.

393

[18] Sadilov P. V., Baskakov A. P., (1973) "Temperature fluctuations at the surface of a

394

fluidized bed with gas combustion occuring therein", Int. J. of Chem. Eng., 13 (3), pp

395

449.

396

[19]

397

reactor”, PhD Thesis report, Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, QC, Canada.

398

[20]

399

fluidized bed" Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, pp 999-1007.

400

[21] Wen, C.Y. and Chen, L.H., (1982) "Fluidized bed freeboard phenomena :

401 402 403

Sotudeh-Gharebaagh (1998) “Combustion of natural gas in a turbulent fluidized bed

Van Der Vaart D. R., (1992) "Mathematical modelling of methane combustion in a

entrainement and elutriation", AIChE J., 28 (1), pp117-128. [22] Westbrook C. K., Dryer F. L., (1981) "Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames", Comb. Sci. and Tech. 27 (31).

404

[23] Yanata I., Makhorin K. E., Glukhomanyuk A. M., (1975) "Investigation and

405

modelling of the combustion of natural gas in a fluidized bed of inert heat carrier", Int.

406

J. Chem. Eng., 15 (1) pp 68-72.

407 408 409 410

[24] Yates J. G., Rowe P. N., (1977) "A model for chemical reaction in the freeboard region above a

fluidized bed", Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs., 55, pp 137.

[25] Zenz F. A., Weil N. A., (1958) "A theoretical-empirical approach to the mechanism of particle entrainment from fluidized beds", AIChE J. 4 (4), pp 472-479.

Figure(s)

CH4

O2

CO2

4

CO

Flame detection

3

Cooling unit 2

(1)

5

2

2

Temperature and pressure drop acquisition devices

PID PID 4

Air 2

6 1 Reactor 2 manual valve. 3 Rotameter. 4 Electro-valve. 5 Pump. 6 Pneumatic valve

2

4

D.M

Figure 1: schematic of the set-up.

Natural gas

Figure(s)

Tbed = 650 °C Tbed = 800 °C

Tbed = 700 °C Tbed = 850 °C

Tbed = 750 °C

200 Dense bed

T-T

(°C)

100

0 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

-100

-200

Height (cm)

Figure 2: Evolution of the difference T-Tbed along the reactor for different dense bed temperatures.

Figure(s)

Z = 112 mm

Z = 250 mm

Z = 338 mm

Z = 438 mm

0,6 0,5

/P

0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 600

650

700

750

800

850

900

Temperature (°C) Figure 3: Normalised standard deviation of pressure drop fluctuations at different heights in the reactor against dense bed temperature.

Figure(s)

CH4

20

CO2 O2

Mole fraction (%)

16 Freeboard

Dense bed

12 8 4 0 0

20

40

60

80

Height (cm) Figure 4-a: Mole fraction profiles of stable chemical species (Test C1, Tbed = 700 °C).

100

Figure(s)

CO mole fraction (%)

0,3

0,2

0,1

0 0

20

40

60

80

Height (cm) Figure 4-b: CO mole fraction profile (Test C1, Tbed = 700 °C).

100

Figure(s)

U = 2.Umf

U = 3.Umf

U = 4.Umf

Temperature (°C)

1000 900 800 700 600 500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Height (cm) Figure 5: Temperature profiles obtained at Tbed = 700 °C for three values of gas velocity.

140

Figure(s)

Ug = 2.Umf

Ug = 3.Umf

Ug = 4.Umf

Methane conversion rate (%)

100 80 60 40 20 0 0

20

40

60

80

Height (cm) Figure 6: Methane conversion rate profiles at Tbed = 700 °C for three values of gas velocity.

100

Figure(s)

dp = 100 µm

dp = 350 µm

dp = 550 µm

Methane conversion rate (%)

100 80 60 40 20 0 0

20

40

60

80

Height (cm) Figure 7: Methane conversion rate at 700 °C for three particle sizes.

100

Figure(s)

experimental measures Simulation: n=13,4 et E=47200 cal/mol

Temperature (°C)

900 800 700 600 500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Height (cm) Figure 8: Temperature profile of gas-particles suspension: Comparison between the experimental results and the model predictions (Tbed = 700 °C).

Figure(s)

Experimental measures : % CH4 Experimental measures : % CO2 Experimental measures : % O2 Simulation: n = 13,4 and E = 47200 cal/mol

Mole fraction (%)

20 16 12 8 4 0 0

20

40

60

80

100

Height (cm) Figure 9: Mole fraction profiles of the main species present in gas stream: Comparison between the experimental results and the model predictions (Tbed = 700 °C).

Figure(s)

Experimental measures Simulation : n = 13 and E = 47200 cal/mol

Temperature (°C)

900 800 700 600 500 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Height (cm) Figure 10: Temperature profile of gas-particle suspension: Comparison between the experimental results and the model predictions (Tbed = 750 °C).

Figure(s)

Experimental measures : % CH4 Experimental measures : % CO2 Experimental measures : % O2 Simulation: n = 13 and E = 47200 cal/mol

Mole fraction (%)

20 16 12 8 4 0 0

20

40

60

80

100

Height (cm) Figure 11: Mole fraction profiles of the main species present in gas stream: Comparison between the experimental results and the model predictions (Tbed = 750 °C).

Figure(s)

Experiment al measures : U = 2Umf Experiment al measures : U = 3Umf Experiment al measures : U = 4Umf

Simulat ion : U = 2 Umf Simulat ion : U = 3 Umf Simulat ion : U = 4 Umf

Methane conversion rate (%)

100 80 60 40 20 0 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Height (cm) Figure 12: Comparison between experimental results and model predictions: Effect of superficial gas velocity.

Figure(s)

Experimental measures : dp=100µm

Simulatio n : dp = 100µm

Experimental measures : dp=350µm

Simulatio n : dp = 350µm

Methane conversion rate (%)

100 80 60 40 20 0 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Height (cm) Figure 13: Comparison between experimental results and model predictions: Effect of the mean particle diameter.

Table(s)

Experience

Solid mass (kg)

Ug/Umf at 20 °C

Excess air factor

dp (µm)

Variable parameter

C1

12

2

1,2

350

Reference

C2

9

C3

15

2

1,2

350

Solid mass

1,2

350

Superficial gas velocity

350

Excess air factor

100

Mean particle diameter

C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9

12

3 4

12

2

12

2

1 1,5 1,2

550

Table 1: Operating conditions of premixed air-natural gas combustion experiments.

Table(s)

Variable

Correlation

Referenc e

Solid hold-up

   0 exp(a  h)

[12]

Entrainment

F  F0 exp(a  h)

[13]

flux of particles projected at the bed surface Contact efficiency factor

1  f w  1   mf    s  U g  U mf  with fw = 0,25 2 1     1   bed exp a  h  with a  6.62 m-1

F0 

Graphical correlation of Kunii and Levenspiel (1990) Table 2: Correlations used for the hydrodynamic parameters.

Exponential factor "a"

[13] [13] [12]

Table(s)

Mass balance



3 U g Ci



N



 4 U g Ci



N 1



 U g Ci



N 2

 2   N  ri  dhN  0

i  1, Nc

gas phase N

 U g NC  yi H i   4 yi H i    i 1  Tg i 1   N 6 1   N   hgp  R  Tg  T p  2 P dp

U g 3  Tg

NC



N 1

N

U g   Tg



N

 yi H i   i 1  NC

N 2

 dh N  0

particulate phase



Heat balance





 F N 1  cp  A  T N 1  T  F N 1  cp  A  T N 1  T s p ref d s p ref  a  6 N N 1   N    N  hgp  A  Tg  T p  dh N  qtot N   d p N N 4   N  Fa  Fd   cp s  A  T p  Tref  2    A   gN T p   N  h pw    D r  dh N   T p  Tw int   





 

 

 

Particles to reactor wall heat transfer coefficient:

  Tp  Tw   Tp2  Tw2  1 1 Lg  1 w g Gas-to-particle heat transfer coefficient:  kg   1 1    2  0,6  Re 2  Pr 3  h gp   d     p h pw 

kg



Table 3: Model equations (heat and mass balances).



i 1  2  3  4 5 0 6 7

CH4 O2 N2 CO2 H 2O CO NO

Table(s)

Reaction

Reaction rate expression

Kinetic parameters

n  13,2  0,2 R1

 0,7  CO0,28  exp  rCH 4  10 n  CCH 4 

rCO  10  CCO  C n

R2

0, 25 O2

C

0, 5 H 2O

E  4,18   10  3 R  T 

 E  4,18   4, 5  exp    10  R T  



E  48400  1200 cal.mol -1



n  14,75  0,4



E  43000  2200 cal.mol -1

Table 4: Reaction rate expressions and kinetic parameters values according to Dryer and Glassman (1973).