|
|
Received: 1 September 2016 Revised: 11 November 2016 Accepted: 27 November 2016 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2691
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Multifunctionality is affected by interactions between green roof plant species, substrate depth, and substrate type Yann Dusza1 | Sébastien Barot1 | Yvan Kraepiel1 | Jean-Christophe Lata1,2 | Luc Abbadie1 | Xavier Raynaud1 1 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, IRD, CNRS, INRA, UPEC, Univ. Paris Diderot, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences-Paris, iEESParis, Paris, France 2
Department of Geoecology and Geochemistry, Institute of Natural Resources, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia Correspondence Yann Dusza, iEES-Paris/UPMC, Paris, France. Email:
[email protected] Funding information Mission Economie de la Biodiversité of CDCBiodiversité, Caisse des Dépôts group; Paris 2030, City of Paris
Summary Green roofs provide ecosystem services through evapotranspiration and nutrient cycling that depend, among others, on plant species, substrate type, and substrate depth. However, no study has assessed thoroughly how interactions between these factors alter ecosystem functions and multifunctionality of green roofs. We simulated some green roof conditions in a pot experiment. We planted 20 plant species from 10 genera and five families (Asteraceae, Caryophyllaceae, Crassulaceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae) on two substrate types (natural vs. artificial) and two substrate depths (10 cm vs. 30 cm). As indicators of major ecosystem functions, we measured aboveground and belowground biomasses, foliar nitrogen and carbon content, foliar transpiration, substrate water retention, and dissolved organic carbon and nitrates in leachates. Interactions between substrate type and depth strongly affected ecosystem functions. Biomass production was increased in the artificial substrate and deeper substrates, as was water retention in most cases. In contrast, dissolved organic carbon leaching was higher in the artificial substrates. Except for the Fabaceae species, nitrate leaching was reduced in deep, natural soils. The highest transpiration rates were associated with natural soils. All functions were modulated by plant families or species. Plant effects differed according to the observed function and the type and depth of the substrate. Fabaceae species grown on natural soils had the most noticeable patterns, allowing high biomass production and high water retention but also high nitrate leaching from deep pots. No single combination of factors enhanced simultaneously all studied ecosystem functions, highlighting that soil–plant interactions induce trade-offs between ecosystem functions. Substrate type and depth interactions are major drivers for green roof multifunctionality. KEYWORDS
ecosystem services, evapotranspiration, nitrogen and carbon cycles, soil–plant interactions, trade-offs, urban ecology, water retention
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Ecology and Evolution 2017; 1–13
www.ecolevol.org | 1
|
DUSZA et al.
2
1 | INTRODUCTION
are designed to be highly porous to reduce their mass/volume ratio. Therefore, water retention not only depends on the interparticle pore
While urban areas accounted for 54% of the world population in
size distribution, but also on intraparticle pore sizes (Graceson, Hare,
2014 (United Nations 2014), there is growing evidence that urban
Monaghan, & Hall, 2013).
ecosystems are crucial to tackle environmental issues in cities. Recent
Deeper substrates tend to lead to better plant growth (Nagase
studies have shown that urban forests, rivers, wetlands, cultivated
& Dunnett, 2010; Thuring, Berghage, & Beattie, 2010; VanWoert,
lands, grassland parks, and street greenery can provide multiple, scale-
Rowe, Andresen, Rugh, & Xiao, 2005). There is also evidence that
dependant, ecosystem services. In contrast, green roofs have received
increasing depth leads to higher water retention (Buccola & Spolek,
less attention so far (Luederitz et al., 2015). As urban constructed eco-
2010; Mentens, Raes, & Hermy, 2006). However, the role of depth
systems, they are able to provide multiple ecosystem services, such
concerning water quality is less consistent. Seidl, Gromaire, Saad,
as thermal regulation of buildings, urban heat island mitigation, runoff
and De Gouvello (2013) observed that 16-cm-deep substrates led to
water mitigation, water and air quality improvement, carbon storage,
higher nitrate and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching compared
sound proofing, and biodiversity support (Oberndorfer et al., 2007).
to 6-cm-deep substrates. This study suggests that increasing sub-
Green roof design is constrained by load capacities of buildings, in
strate nitrogen and carbon content, through the increase in the total
particular when the installation of green roofs is decided after build-
amount of substrate (mineral and organic matter), is likely to decrease
ing construction. This need for lightness has led to the development
water quality. In contrast, Retzlaff et al. (2008) and Razzaghmanesh,
of porous draining substrates based on light mineral components
Beecham, and Salemi (2016) did not report any difference in nitrate
(Ondoño, Martínez-Sánchez, & Moreno, 2016) such as pozzolan, a
concentrations of leachates from green roof systems when compar-
light and porous volcanic material. Green roof typologies are there-
ing, respectively, 5/10 cm and 10/30 cm depths. Soil depth could
fore based on substrate weight and depth. “Extensive” green roofs
thus modulate the pollution of runoff water by other mechanisms. For
have thin substrate layers (usually
