Multilayer networks: metrics and spectral properties

Multilayer networks: metrics and spectral properties

arXiv:1504.05567v1 [physics.soc-ph] 21 Apr 2015

Emanuele Cozzo, Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, Francisco A. Rodrigues and Yamir Moreno

Abstract Multilayer networks represent systems in which there are several topological levels each one representing one kind of interaction or interdependency between the systems’ elements. These networks have attracted a lot of attention recently because their study allows considering different dynamical modes concurrently. Here, we revise the main concepts and tools developed up to date. Specifically, we focus on several metrics for multilayer network characterization as well as on the spectral properties of the system, which ultimately enable for the dynamical characterization of several critical phenomena. The theoretical framework is also applied for description of real-world multilayer systems.

Emanuele Cozzo Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI) and Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain, e-mail: [email protected] Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda Departamento de Matemática Aplicada e Estat´ıstica, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computaça˜ o, Universidade de São Paulo - Campus de São Carlos, Caixa Postal 668, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil. e-mail: [email protected] Francisco A. Rodrigues Departamento de Matemática Aplicada e Estat´ıstica, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computaça˜ o, Universidade de São Paulo - Campus de São Carlos, Caixa Postal 668, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil. e-mail: [email protected] Yamir Moreno Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI) and Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain and Complex Networks and Systems Lagrange Lab, Institute for Scientific Interchange, Turin, Italy e-mail: yamir.moreno@gmail. com

1

2

Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length

1 Introduction Complex network science relies on the hypothesis that the behavior of many complex systems can be explained by studying structural and functional relations among its components by means of a graph representation. The emergence of interconnected network models responds to the fact that complex systems include multiple subsystems organized as layers of connectivity. In this way, interconnected networks have emerged during the last few years as a general framework to deal with hyperconnected systems [1]. With the term interconnected networks one may refer to many types of connections among different networked systems: dependency relations among systems of different objects, cooperative or competitive relations among systems of different agents, or different channels of interactions among the same set of actors, to name a few. What these examples have in common is that different interaction modes among a differentiated or indistinguishable set of components/actors might exist. Although this framework has been used for many years, only in the last several years it has attracted more attention and a number of formalisms have been proposed to deal with multilayer networks [2, 3]. Here we elaborate on a formalism developed recently and discussed at length in the review paper by Kivela et al. [4]. To this end, we report on a more refined formalism that is aimed at optimizing the study of a particular case of interconnected networks that is of much interest: Multiplex Networks. In Multiplex Networks a set of agents might interact in different ways, i.e., through different means. Since a subset of agents is present at the same time in different networks of interactions (layers), these layers become interconnected. Examples of such type of systems can be founded in different fields, from biological systems, where the web of molecular interactions in a cell make use of many different biochemical channels and pathways, to technological systems, where person-toperson communication (usually machine-mediated) happens across many different modes. We take the last example as a paradigmatic one, which gave rise to the now popular term ”hyperconnectivity” [5]. Suppose we are interested in analyzing a set of social agents (individuals, institutions, firms, etc. ), who interact among them through a number of online social networks (OSNs) like Twitter, Facebook, etc. Some of these agents might be present in several OSNs and exchange information through them, using the information obtained in one network to communicate in another one, or integrating information across all of those in which they are active. We represent such a system as a set of graphs, one for each OSN, in which each actor who participates in it is represented by a node. These networks are the layers of the graph. In this scheme, the same actors are represented by a number of different nodes (as many nodes as the number of layers in which the actor is present). At the same time, we represent the fact that different nodes might denote the same actors, thus being related, by a coupling graph in which nodes representing the same actors are connected. The rest of the Chapter is organized as follows. The first section translates the aforementioned structural features in the formal language of graph theory. By doing


3

that, we synthesize the topology of such a system in terms of matrices. In addition, as many years of research [6] have demonstrated, the relation between structure and function can be studied by means of the spectral properties of the matrices representing the graph structure. This is also studied in the second part of this Chapter, where we give a simple example of the epidemic spreading process and analyze real world multilayer networks.

2 Notation, basic definitions and properties A multiplex network is a quadruple M = (L, n, P, M). L = {1, . . . , m} is an index set that we call the layer set. Here we have assumed L ⊂ N for practical reasons and without loss of generality. We indicate the general element of L with Greek lower case letters. Moreover, n is a set of nodes and P = (n, L, N), N ⊆ n × L is a binary relation. Finally, the statement (n, α) ∈ N is read node n participates in layer α. We call the ordered pair (n, α) ∈ N a node-layer pair and we say that the node-layer pair (n, α) is the representative of node n in layer α. On the other hand, M = {Gα }α∈L is a set of graphs, that we call layer-graphs, indexed by means of L. The node set of a layer-graph Gβ ∈ M is a sub-set nβ ⊂ N such that nβ = {(n, α) ∈ P | α = β }, so the nodes of Gβ are node-layer pairs; in that sense we say that node-layer pairs represent nodes in layers. The edge set of a graph Gα ∈ M is Eβ ⊆ nβ × nβ . Additionally, the binary relation P can be identified with its graph GP . GP has nodes set given by n ∪ L, and edge set EP = N, and we call it the participation graph. Consider the graph GC on N in which there is an edge between two node-layer pairs (n, α) and (m, β ) only if n = m; that is, only if the two edges in the graph GP are incident on the same node n ∈ n, which means that the two node-layer pairs represent the same node in different layers. We call GC the coupling graph. It is easy to realize that the coupling graph is formed by n =| n | disconnected components that are clicks or isolated nodes. Each clique is formed by all the representatives of a node in the layers, we call the components of GC supra-nodes. Let’s now also consider the graph Gl on the same nodes set N, and in which there is an edge between two node-layer pairs (n, α), (m, β ) only if α = β ; that is, only if the two edges in the graph GP are incident on the same node α ∈ L. We call Gl the layer graph. It is easy to realize that graph is formed by m =| L | disconnected components that are clicks. Finally, we can define the supra-graph GM as the union of the layer-graphs with S the coupling graph: GC ∪ M. GM has node set N and edge set α Eα ∪ EC . GM is a synthetic representation of the Multiplex Network M . It results that each layergraph Gα is a sub-graph of GM induced by nα . Furthermore, when all nodes participate in all layer-graphs the Multiplex Network is said to be fully aligned [4] and the coupling graph is made of n complete graphs of m nodes. It is useful to come back to our system of social agents as a paradigmatic multiplex network to make sense of the previous definitions. The layer set is the list

4

Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length

of OSNs, for example L = {Facebook, Twitter, Google+}. Since for practical purposes we want a set of indexes that are natural numbers, we may say that: Facebook is 1, Twitter is 2, and Google+ is 3. The set of nodes is the set of social actors, for example n = {Marc, Alice, BiFi, Nick, Rose}. The binary relations represent the participation of each of these agents in some of the OSNs, thus we have that an statement of the type Alice has a Facebook account is represented by the pair (Alice, 1), that is a node-layer pair. Each set of relation in each OSN is represented by a graph, for example the link [(Alice, 1), (Nick, 1)] means that Alice and Nick are friends on Facebook. If Alice has a Facebook account and a Twitter account, but not a Google+ account, in the coupling graph we will have the connected component [(Alice, 1), (Alice, 2)] that is the supra-node related to Alice. If only the BiFi, Nick, and Rose have Google+ accounts, in the layer graph we will have the connected component [(Bi f i, 3), (Nick, 3), (Rose, 3)].

3 Multiplex networks related Matrices 3.1 Adjacency matrices In general, the adjacency matrix of a (unweighted, undirected) graph G with N nodes is a N × N (symmetric) matrix A = {ai j }, with ai j = 1 only if there is an edge between i and j in G, and ai j = 0 otherwise. We can consider the adjacency matrix of each of the graphs introduced in the previous section. The adjacency matrix of a layer graph Gα is a nα × nα symmetric matrix Aα = aαi j , with aαi j = 1 only if there is an edge between (i, α) and ( j, α) in Gα . We call them layer adjacency matrices. Likewise, the adjacency matrix of GP is an n × m matrix P = piα , with piα = 1 only if there is an edge between the node i and the layer α in the participation graph, i.e. only if node i participate in layer α. We call it the participation matrix. The adjacency matrix of the coupling graph GC is an N × N matrix C = {ci j }, with ci j = 1 only if there is an edge between node-layer pair i and j in GC , i.e. if they are representatives of the same node in different layers. We can arrange the rows and the columns of C such that node-layer pairs of the same layer are contiguous and layers are ordered. We assume that C is always arranged in that way. It results that C is a block matrix with zero diagonal blocks. Thus, ci j = 1, with i, j = 1, . . . , N represents an edge between a node-layer pair in layer 1 and a node-layer pair in layer 2 if i < n1 and n1 < j < n2 . Figure 1 shows a multiplex network and the respective matrices A and C .


5

3.2 The supra-adjacency matrix The supra-adjacency matrix is the adjacency matrix of the supra-graph GM . Just as GM , A¯ is a synthetic representation of the whole multiplex M . By definition, it can be obtained from the intra-layer adjacency matrices and the coupling matrix in the following way: M A¯ = Aα + C , (1) α

where the same consideration as in C applies for the indices. We also define A = L α A , and we call it the intra-layer adjacency matrix. Figure 1 shows the supraadjacency and the intra-layer adjacency matrices of a multiplex network. Some basic metrics are easily calculated from the supra-adjacency matrix. The degree of a node-layer i is the number of node-layers connected to it by an edge in GM and is given by Ki = ∑ A¯i j . (2) j

Sometimes we write i(α) as an index, instead of simply i, to explicitly indicate that the node-layer i is in layer α even if the index i already uniquely indicates a nodelayer pair. Since A¯ can be read as a block matrix, with the Aα on the diagonal blocks, the index i(α) can be interpreted as block index. It is also useful to define the following quantities eα = ∑ nβ , (3) β