Multilayer Organic Multi-Chip Module Implementing ...

T-MTT 5572

1

Multilayer Organic Multi-Chip Module Implementing Hybrid Microelectromechanical Systems Morgan Jikang Chen, Student Member, IEEE, Anh-Vu Pham, Senior Member, IEEE, Nicole Evers, Chris Kapusta, Joseph Iannotti, William Kornrumpf, and John Maciel

Abstract—We present the design and development of an organic package that is compatible with fully released RF microelectromechanical systems. The multilayer organic package consists of a liquid crystal polymer film to provide near hermetic cavities for MEMS. The stack is further built up using organic, thin-film polyimide. To demonstrate the organic package, we have designed and implemented a 2-bit true-time delay X-band phase shifter using commercially available microelectromechanical switches. The packaged phase shifter has a measured insertion loss of 2.45 ± 0.12 dB/bit at 10 GHz. The worst-case phase variation of the phase shifter at 10 GHz is measured to less than 5°. We have also conducted temperature cycling (-55 oC to 125 oC) and 85/85 to qualify the packaging structures. Index Terms—Cavities, chip-on-flex, liquid crystal polymer (LCP), MEMS, packaging, phase shifter, and microwave.

O

I. INTRODUCTION

RGANIC modules for RF/Microwave components and subsystems continue to be an attractive packaging platform for microwave and millimeter-wave frequency applications [1-5]. These organic modules house chips under polymer films to form a complete package. Previous researchers have attempted to integrate microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) components into the organic module [6, 7]. Although organic modules have demonstrated excellent capabilities up to 110 GHz, they have the drawback of using of moisture-absorbed polyimide. It has been shown that MEMS devices are not compatible with modules that are constructed with polyimide due to high gas permeability rates. Further, the Kapton polyimide inside the MEMS cavity outgasses during bonding processes of glass, gold, or epoxy Manuscript received May 14, 2007. This work was supported in part by the NSF CAREER award and UC Micro. M. J. Chen and A.-V. Pham are with the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Microwave Microsystems Laboratory, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA (phone: 530-752-8547; fax: 530-752-8428; e-mail: [email protected]). N. Evers, C. Kapusta, and J. Iannotti are with General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA. W. Kornrumpf was with General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA. He is now with MicroKorn LLC. J. Maciel is with Radant MEMS, Stow, MA 01775, USA.

layers. If these types of contamination occur, the MEMS switches may be detrimentally affected. Previously, we had shown how to individually package RF MEMS devices using liquid crystal polymer (LCP) [8]. In that work, we showed the process development for an LCP-capped MEMS package. The LCP-capped package exhibited very low outgassing as tested by ASTM E595, strong interlayer adhesions as verified by peel strength results, and no detected leaks during Method 1014, MIL-STD-883 hermeticity tests. In this paper, we significantly expand on the design and development of our organic multi-chip package for hybrid RF MEMS circuits [9]. This paper focuses on the advanced packaging techniques developed to integrate separate MEMS devices into a single package. The hybrid MEMS package consists of multilayered Kapton polyimide films and an LCP film layer that provides protection against moisture absorption. We have demonstrated the design and implementation of a 2-bit true-time delay X-band phase shifter using commercially available MEMS switches. The phase shifter has a measured insertion loss of 2.45 ± 0.12 dB per bit at 10 GHz. The worst-case phase variation of the phase shifter at 10 GHz is measured to less than 5°. Section II describes the fabrication process. Section III describes reliability characteristics of the organic module after 85/85 and temperature cycling (-55 oC to 125 oC). Section IV demonstrates electrical characteristics of the phase shifter package, and section V provides conclusions. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSES We have developed a process to package MEMS devices for system-in-package integration. First, a substrate containing 56 MEMS devices arranged in a 7 by 8 grid array is packaged into LCP cavities that provides near hermetic environments. To form a package, a 2 mil thick LCP film sputtered with copper is laser ablated to form the lid in which a MEMS device is housed. The LCP lid is aligned around a MEMS device and is laminated at low-temperature to the silicon substrate. Vertical microvias are formed with laser processes to have a 100 µm x 100 µm square area, 50 µm height, and 10 µm plating. Contact pads are formed to occupy 200 µm x 250 µm area. The 56 packaged parts are individually separated with a dicing saw. Each packaged RF MEMS switch is 1.3

T-MTT 5572

2

mm by 1.3 mm wide and 0.7 mm tall. The final packaged dimension is designed larger than the actual 100 µm long switch for handling and packaging considerations. The process to fully package the phase shifter starts by tension mounting a 2 mil thick Kapton1 polyimide film to a steel ring for planar process handling. The polyimide is then sputtered with a titanium/tungsten seed layer and electroplated to form 4 µm thick layer of copper. The metal is then etched with lithography steps that involve spinning on photoresist, ultra-violet mask exposure, photoresist development, copper etch, and photoresist strip. This forms signal traces along the top and a ground plane along the bottom. The minimum feature sizes on copper are 25 µm for reliable production. Next, LCP-capped MEMS switches are aligned with electrical connections facing the bottom of the Kapton with the aid of fiducial marks. Then, the MEMS parts are affixed to the polyimide with a dam-and-fill step. This process consists of highly viscous plastic to form a well that is subsequently filled in with lower viscosity plastic and cured at low temperature. The molding compound layer has 1 mm total thickness. Lastly, 60 µm x 60 µm square via interconnections are formed through the top of the polyimide to the LCP-capped MEMS package by steps including laser ablation, copper sputtering, and electroplating. Additional laminates can be added to the stack using conventional flex technology. A cross-section of a fully packaged MEMS device in the film stack is illustrated in Fig. 1. Detailed photographs of the organic process are provided in Fig. 2. A part that has been RF tested is shown in Fig. 2a., and a close-up of the well defined plated via technology is shown in Fig. 2b. Copper Cover

Copper Interconnect

Top Polyimide or LCP

LCP Microvia

MEMS Cavity

(a)

(b)

Fig. 2. a) Top-down of MEMS device in LCP, and b) organic module via pad

III. RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LCP/POLYIMIDE MCM In order to demonstrate that the LCP/Polyimide MCM is capable of withstanding environmental stresses, 85/85 and thermal cycling were performed to characterize package robustness. Please note that these tests were conducted strictly for the purpose of characterizing the package and not the MEMS devices. 85/85 The 85/85 test involves placing two LCP-capped RF MEMS switches in a controlled environment at 85 ˚C temperature and 85% relative humidity. For ease of measurement, the two parts are initially determined to be functional by DC probing in the actuated off-on-off states. 85/85 testing is useful to detect metal corrosion on the surface of the part. Part failures indicate that moisture has gotton through the package and sufficiently interfered with the MEMS functionality. Intermediate measurements are made every 24 hours in order to ensure that the part remains functional. After 72 hours, two out of two, or 100%, of the parts survived with functionality as measured with DC testing. Fig. 3. shows the top-down photograph of a part to be tested under 85/85. Table 1 summarizes packaged switch operation with intermediate readouts throughout the 72 hour duration.

Silicon

Molding Compound Bottom Fig. 1. Cross-section diagram of LCP/polyimide MCM for MEMS

Fig. 3. Photograph taken top-down of an LCP-cap to be subjected to reliability testing 1

[Online]. Available: http://www.kapton-dupont.com

T-MTT 5572

3

DC Probe

Frost

Contact Pad

Fig. 4. DC measurement of -45 °C LCP-capped MEMS switch covered with frost

5

1001

On Resistance [Ohms]

4.8 4.6

1000

4.4 4.2

999

4 3.8

998

3.6 3.4

90 V

3.2

0V

3

997

Off Resistance [Ohms]

Thermal Cycling Thermal cycling is performed on 2 LCP-capped switches. The two parts are determined to be functional at the onset of testing by a DC off-on-off method as described in the section above. Thermal cycling tests consisted of 800 cooling and heating cycles that alternate between -55 ˚C and 125 ˚C. During each cycle, the part is exposed to the upper and lower ends of the temperature scale for greater than 10 minutes. This allows time for the part to thermally equilibrate with a controlled environment. The MEMS part itself is fairly insensitive to temperature since it makes connections through metal-metal contacts. Stress may be significant at locations where materials with different coefficients of thermal expansions come into contact. The stresses induced on the package are expected to peak at the temperature extremes. With each successive cycle, the package is further fatigued and any damage incurred is accumulated. When the test temperature dropped below 0 ˚C, ice formed on the package, as shown in Fig. 4. The presence of ice in the vias adds physical strain by water that pools, freezes, and expands. After thermal cycling, both switches are found to remain operational under DC probing up to 800 cycles. Parts had been intermediately tested after 400 cycles to ensure that parts are functional throughout the tests. A resistance measurement of a switch over temperature is provided in Fig. 5. At room temperature, resistances across the LCP-capped switch are found to be 4 Ω in the on-state and 1000 Ω in the off-state. The resistance is measured to vary by 0.46 Ω between 25 °C and -45 °C. The varying on-resistance over temperature is due to increased resistivity as temperature increases. Most metals have ~0.005 resistivity/°C. Neglecting the small change due to the coefficient of thermal expansion, resistance is expected to vary by 0.35 Ω over the 70 °C range and matches measurement to 1st order approximation. Note that even though there is a concern about the integrity of via structures due to coefficient of thermal expansion mismatches, we have observed no via failures under temperature cycling. Similarly, there had been a concern about failure at the LCP and silicon interface. However, these tests show that the parts remain functional and maintained a near-hermetic environment for MEMS.

996 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

10 20 30

Temp. [Celsius] Fig. 5. Resistance of LCP-capped switch in the on-state and off-state over a range of temperature

IV. DESIGN OF A MULTI-CHIP MODULE PACKAGED MEMS PHASE SHIFTER We have designed and implemented a 2-bit MEMS phase shifter into an organic module to demonstrate hybrid MEMS integration that is intended to operate at 10 GHz. The packaged phase shifter consists of individually packaged MEMS Single Pole Single Throw (SPST) switches in LCP. The silicon MEMS part is first packaged into a cavity composed of LCP and copper for hermetic protection [8]. Then, the LCP-capped MEMS parts are integrated into a fully packaged phase shifter. In this scheme, many MEMS devices are encapsulated in the stack and connected by interconnect lines. The delay lines are built into the package with 4 µm thick copper on 2 mil thick Kapton polyimide films. A 4 µm thick copper package ground plane is located at the interface where the Kapton and the LCP-capped switches meet. Phase shifting is controlled by directing the RF signal through delay lines of varying physical length. By closing the correct combination of switches, 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° phase shifts may be incurred at a specific frequency. An illustration of the packaged phase shifter circuit is provided in Fig. 6.

T-MTT 5572

4 Delay line on polyimide packaging

LCP packaged MEMS Switch

Via transition from polyimide microstrip to LCP package

CPW RF Launch on polyimide

Fig. 6. Circuit topology of the TTD switched line phase shifter packaged in thin-film organic LCP and polyimide

Lumped element LCP-capped switch models have been developed using measured S-parameters. In the case of the LCP-capped switch in an open position, two RLC sections of R = 2 Ω, L = 200 pH, and C = 90 fF are separated by a 34 fF series capacitor that models the capacitance between the RF electrodes as shown in Fig. 7. The closed LCP-capped switch model consists of two sections of a 105 fF shunt capacitance, 420 pH series inductance, and 4 Ω series resistance as in Fig. 8. The difference between the two models is due to physical changes in the switch causing variation of 20 pH inductance and 15 fF capacitance between the open and closed states.

where p is the relative phase shift in units of degrees, f is the frequency, vp is the propagation velocity, and l1 and l2 are respectively the delay and reference line lengths. Delay line lengths on Kapton polyimide are 8.64 mm, 13.24 mm, 18.17 mm, and 22.77 mm from end-to-end for the 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° phase shifts, respectively. The insertion loss of each polyimide delay line is analytically calculated at 10 GHz to give 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 dB, respectively. Each phase shift includes 4 LCP-capped MEMS switches that are packaged into the RF path. The LCP-capped switches add 0.55 dB additional loss per switch, or 2.2 dB total, to the phase shifter. There is an additional 0.015 dB loss incurred at each package via to connect the delay lines on polyimide to the LCP-capped MEMS switches. A 0.8 mm long inductive matching section is built onto the polyimide package located at the switch junctions. This compensates a 230 fF capacitance presented by the off-state switch and stub section. The fabricated inductive section on polyimide package is measured to be 34 µm wide. A distance of 175 µm separates the inductive section from a nearby ground plane on the module by more than 5 times the inductor width of 34 µm to ensure minimal coupling. An illustration of the junction on package is provided in Fig. 9.

RF in RF-on Port RF in Fig. 7. Open switch model with L = 200 pF, R = 2 Ω, C1 = 90 fF, and C2 = 34 fF.

Via Interconnect

RF-off port

RF off port 175 µm 800 µm

34 µm wide Inductive Section

625 µm 117 µm

625 µm

RF thru port

Fig. 9. Illustration of a tee junction in the organic package

Fig. 8. Closed switch model with L = 420 pH, R = 4 Ω, C = 105 fF.

Transmission lines on 2 mil thick Kapton film of 50 Ω characteristic impedance have been simulated analytically at lengths corresponding to the required X-band phase delays. The relative phase shift is given as

 f  p = 360 ⋅   ⋅ (l1 − l2 ) v   p

(1)

Analysis is performed on the 3-port T-junction with empirical impedance terminations based on LCP-capped switch measurements. The majority of power from RF input is transferred to RF-thru, but a small percentage of the power is transferred to the RF-off path due to a low isolation of 14 dB at 10 GHz in the MEMS switch. Hence, the T-junction may be considered an asymmetric power divider with outputs having ~91.2% and ~5.9% of the original input power. Thus, the path from the junction input to the on-state path has ~0.4 dB insertion loss. The remaining 2.9% of the original power inserted into the junction is lost due to attenuation associated with conductor and dielectric losses. Specifically, the 2.9% loss comes from ~1.6% at the package matching section and ~1.3% at the packaged stub sections. Simulated results between the input and the intended thru path are plotted in Fig. 10. Over the band from 1 GHz to 12 GHz, insertion loss varies between 0.42 dB to 0.74 dB, and return loss is better than 10 dB from the RF In port to the RF Thru port. Over the narrow band from 9.5 GHz to 10 GHz, the plot shows less

T-MTT 5572

5

than 0.42 dB insertion loss and better than 20 dB return loss through the matching section and junction.

-5

-0.3

-10

-0.6

-15

-0.9

-20

-1.2

S11

-25

Bit 1

0

S21 [dB]

-1.5

S21

-30

-1.8 0

2

4

6

8

10

Bit 2

S11 [dB]

0

Table 1. Loss analysis of phase shifter in dB

0°

90°

180°

270°

Tee Via MEMS Via Delay Via MEMS Via Tee Tee

0.4 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.123 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.4 0.4

0.4 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.229 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.4 0.4

0.4 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.123 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.4 0.4

0.4 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.229 0.015 0.55 0.015 0.4 0.4

Via

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

MEMS

0.55

0.55

0.55

0.55

Via

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

Delay

0.077

0.077

0.296

0.296

Via

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

Fig. 10: Simulated insertion and return loss of the through path junction in the package

MEMS

0.55

0.55

0.55

0.55

Via

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

ADS simulations of the phase shifter have been performed to take package effects into account. The LCP-capped MEMS switches are modeled with the 2-port S-parameter measurements. Package vias are modeled using Method of Moments analysis on the Kapton polyimide structure. The remaining transmission lines on polyimide packaging are simulated with built-in microstripline and waveguide models provided in Agilent Advanced Design System. A summary of the simulated phase shifter loss and its contributions due to each stage of the 2-bit design is provided below in Table 1. Losses are roughly identified to be 0.4 dB from each Tjunction, 0.015 dB from each via through the Kapton layer, 0.55 dB per MEMS switch, and between 0.077 dB and 0.296 dB per delay line.

Tee

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

Total Total/bit

4.12 2.06

4.23 2.12

4.34 2.17

4.45 2.23

Freq. [GHz]

V. MEASUREMENT OF THE PACKAGED PHASE SHIFTER The realized hybrid MEMS phase shifter packaged in thinfilm organics is shown below in Fig. 11. as measured with 4 DC probes and 2 RF probes. S-parameter measurements are obtained with an Agilent E8364B Performance Network Analyzer (PNA) on a Cascade probe station. 150 µm pitch picoprobes directly contact the phase shifter on CPW contacts. Calibration is performed with a Line-Reflect-Match (LRM) on an impedance standard substrate (ISS) to allow measurements referenced to the tip of the probes. Four DC pads control a total of eight switches. Measurement involves applying 90 VDC to turn on in-path switches, and 0 VDC is applied to the remaining switches. No DC current is drawn for actuation during this process, and hence, near-zero power is drawn.

T-MTT 5572

6

Delay Line

DC Probe Fiduccial Markings Inductive Section

MEMS Switch Outline

measurements are made on a fully packaged phase shifter that is designed using commercially available MEMS devices. The design would exhibit less loss with the following two changes to the packaged switch: 1) lower thru loss, and 2) isolation characteristics greater than 20 dB for good off-state matching.

0

-1

1.3 mm

-2

-5 -10

-4

-15

-5 -6

-20

-7 Measured

-25

-8

Simulated -30

-9 8

8.5

9

9.5

10

Freq. [GHz] Fig. 12. Operation band phase shifter measurement of return loss and insertion loss as compared with simulation. Data from [9]

-1

0

-2

-5

-3 -10

-4 -5

-15

-6

-20

-7 -25

Insertion Loss [dB/bit]

Fig. 12. shows the measured S-parameters of the phase shifter at 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° as plotted over the operation band. Wideband S-parameter measurements are also provided as shown in Fig. 13. At the 10 GHz operation frequency, the packaged phase shifter insertion losses are measured to be 5.00 dB, 5.06 dB, 4.66 dB, and 4.85 dB for the 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° phase shifts, respectively. Hence, the average insertion loss at 10 GHz is 4.89 ± 0.23 dB or 2.45 ± 0.12 dB/bit. On average, this result is 0.46 dB/bit more than simulated. The return loss is 14.2 dB at 10 GHz, which matches simulation to within 0.5 dB. The wideband data indicates minor deviation from ideal switched line phase shifters at ~6 GHz, and ~7.5 GHz due to implementation with low-isolation switches that cause ringing in the off-state transmission lines. The wideband insertion phases and group delays are plotted in Figs. 14. and 15., respectively. Phase shift errors are found to be less than 5° from specification at 10 GHz. Relative phase shifts at 10 GHz are found to be 0°, 90.2°, 181.8°, and 274.4° degrees. Phase shifts are measured to match simulation to within 15° over the DC to 10 GHz band. Group delays are measured to be ~165 ps, ~190 ps, ~215 ps, and ~240 ps. The 2-bit of group delays are distinctly separated by ~25 ps across all phase shifts across the DC to 10 GHz frequencies. Errors are caused by the off-state resonances at 6 GHz and 7.5 GHz. Low variation in the group delay at the other frequencies indicate that the phase shifter has excellent linearity. The average delay time of ~200 ps is slightly higher in this hybrid design work due to using fully packaged components, as compared to MEMS phase shifters built on-wafer. Table 2 provides a detailed comparison between simulations and measurements for each phase shift. Measured losses approximately match simulated results as shown in Fig. 13. Compared with simulation, the insertion losses are accurate to within 25.7%, and differences are attributed to variation in LCP-capped MEMS performance. Average error between simulation and measurement is found to be 18.6%. Most of the losses are due to the LCP-capped MEMS switches, which totals 2.2 dB across the 2-bit design. About 0.12 dB loss is due to the combined package vias. Note that the electrical

Return Loss [dB]

Gnd Vias Fig. 11. Realized MEMS phase shifter

Return Loss [dB]

RF Probe

Insertion Loss [dB/bit]

-3

-8

-30

-9 0

2

4

6

8

10

Freq. [GHz] Fig. 13. Wideband phase shifter measurement of return loss and insertion loss. Data from [9]

T-MTT 5572

7 LCP. Reliability testing has been performed to show that the LCP-capped MEMS devices can withstand 85/85 and thermal cycling tests. A novel system-in-package module has been demonstrated on the thin-film technology for MEMS in a hybrid LCP/polyimide stack configuration. The realized switched line true-time delay phase shifter is measured to have an average of 2.45 ± 0.12 dB/bit with less than 5˚ phase variation at 10 GHz.

0

Phase [deg.]

-200

0° 90°

-400 -600

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

180°

-800

270°

Measured

-1000

Simulated

-1200 0

2

4

6

8

10

Freq. [GHz] Fig. 14. Wideband phase shifter measurement of relative insertion phase shift in degrees. Data from [9]

Group Delay [ps]

300

The authors wish to acknowledge the collaborative work between the University of California, Davis’s Microwave Microsystems Laboratory, General Electric Global Research Center located in Niskayuna, NY, Lockheed Martin Commercial Space Systems, and Radant MEMS, Incorporated. We would like to acknowledge Nafiz Karabudak from Lockheed Martin Commercial Space Systems. The authors also wish to acknowledge Robert Bellinger from Olympus for assistance with the LEXT microscope. This work was funded in part by the NSF CAREER award. REFERENCES

Measured [1]

Simulated

260

[2]

220 [3]

180

[4]

140

[5]

100 0

2

4

6

Freq. [GHz]

8

10

Fig. 15. Wideband phase shifter measurement of group delay as compared with simulation. Data from [9] Table 2. Comparison of Simulation to Measured Results at 10 GHz 0° 90° 180° 270°

Sim. IL [dB/bit]

Measured [dB/bit]

Error

1.942 1.880 2.070 2.064

2.5 2.53 2.33 2.43

22.3% 25.7% 11.2% 15.1%

VI. CONCLUSION A 2 bit MEMS phase shifter has been demonstrated in multilayer organic module technology. MEMS switches are integrated into the design in hermetic cavities formed in the

[6] [7] [8]

[9]

J. W. Balde, “Crisis in Technology: The Questionable U.S. Ability to Manufacture Thin-Film Multichip Modules,” IEEE Proc. Vol. 80, No. 12, December 1992. M. Pecht, “Characterization of Polymides Used in High Density Interconnects,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology - Part B., Vol. 17, No. 4, November 1994. W. Daum, W. E. Burdick, R. A. Fillion, “Overlay High-Density Interconnect: A Chips First Multichip Module Technology,” IEEE Computer, Vol. 26, No. 4, April 1993. T. R. Haller, B. S. Whitmore, P. J. Zabinski, B. K. Gilbert, “High Frequency Performance of GE High Density Interconnect Modules,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, February 1993. F. Liu, V. Sundaram, B. Wiedenman, and R. Tummala, “Advances in High Density Interconnect Substrate and Printed Wiring Board Technology,” IEEE 6th Int. Conf. on Electronic Packaging Technology, pp. 307-313, Shenzhen, China, September 2005. J. T. Butler, V. M. Bright, J. H. Comtois, “Advanced Multichip Module Packaging of Microelectromechanical Systems,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, pp. 261-264, Chicago, June 1997. G. Rebeiz, RF MEMS: Theory, Design, and Technology. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons, 2003. M. J. Chen, A-V. Pham, C. Kapusta, J. Iannotti, W. Kornrumpf, N. Evers, J. Maciel, "Design and Development of a Hermetic Package using LCP for RF/Microwave MEMS Switches," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 54, No. 11, November 2006. M. J. Chen, N. Evers, C. Kapusta, J. Iannotti, A. Pham, W. Kornrumpf, J Maciel, N Karabudak, “Development of Multilayer Organic Modules for Hermetic Packaging of RF MEMS Circuits,” IEEE Int. Microwave Symposia, San Francisco, CA, June 2006.