Multiplicity free representations of finite groups - MSP
Recommend Documents
Mar 16, 2009 - then the resulting module for FSn, denoted simply Sλ, is usually no ... We say that an FSn-module U has
Abstract. A micro-introduction to the theory of representations of finite groups. ...
dimension dim V = n is called the degree of the representation. In order to make.
PART D: REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS. For the rest of the semester
we will discuss representations of groups, mostly finite groups. An elementary ...
Representations of Finite Groups. Andrew Baker. 07/11/2011. BY: ⃝ A. J. Baker.
School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Glasgow. E-mail address: ...
Oct 20, 2007 - Class functions and the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem. 5. 1.3. Separability. 8. 1.4. Basic notions of multilinear algebra. 9. Exercises on Chapter 1.
tations of finite groups in complex, finite-dimensional vector spaces. 1
Representations. 1.1 General Facts. Let G be a finite group. If E is a vector space
over K, ...
Introduction. This preprint contains two results related to the variety Rep(F, G) of repre- sentations of a finite groups F with values in a simple algebraic group G ...
Classify all irreducible representations of all finite simple groups and related finite
groups. In the following, let G = GF be a finite reductive group of characteristic ...
9 Feb 2012 ... Representations of finite groups are much simpler than those of larger ones, but
they ... than use tricks that definitely work only for finite groups.
Errata on “Representations of finite groups of Lie type”. • In the table of contents,
chapter 9: “Mackey formula” instead of “Mackay formula”. • page 6, line 3: ...
stage some fifty years later—this time it was the creation of the theory of
representations of finite groups. On April 12, 1896, F. G. Frobenius penned his
first letter ...
4 Representations of finite groups: further results. 4.1 Frobenius-Schur indicator.
Suppose that G is a finite group and V is an irreducible representation of G over ...
Feb 13, 2017 - INDRANIL BISWAS, THOMAS KOBERDA, MAHAN MJ, AND ... Let (S, â) be a closed oriented surface with a marked point, let G be a fixed group, and ... NielsenâBaer Theorem (see [FM]) implies that the mapping class group ...
Jul 24, 2011 - 23. 2 Tuesday. 27. 2.1 Perfect complexes over commutative rings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 ...... The result below, attributed to Ravenel [51], is extremely useful in identifying compact objects ...... 101 (1961), 224–239. [30] H.-
*I need to thank my former advisor Robert Guralnick for all his support and advice over the years. I also thank Pham Huu Tiep and Michael Collins for reading the ...
Dec 7, 2016 - GR] 7 Dec 2016 .... (d2) |g| = 8 and either dimÏ = 6, or â = 2 and dimÏ = 7; or ..... for q odd are known to be (2,3,7)-generated (that is, they are ...
cation, from the master list compiled by Wagner ... ers), Burnside published his
group theory book ... However, the 2-volume work Theory of Equations was.
stating that a finite-dimensional unitary representation is completely reducible.
Theorem 2. A representation of a finite group is completely reducible. Example.
of a finite group that are closed under tensor product with simple (or, equiv-
alently all) modules. One application is a proof of the telescope conjecture in.
Contents. Chapter I. Representation theory of finite groups. 5. I.1. Basic
definitions and examples. 5. I.2. Invariant subspaces and complete reducibility. 7.
I.3.
for constructing representations of finite groups. Version 3.0.2. August 2011.
Vahid Dabbaghian. Vahid Dabbaghian. — Email: [email protected]. —
Homepage: ...
Oct 5, 2008 - arXiv:0810.0849v1 [math.RT] 5 Oct 2008 ...... some irreducible CR-modules VC(j), 1 ⤠j ⤠t, which are GLn-conjugate. Let V (j) denote an ...
the representation theory of finite groups. As a student of algebra, I have always been fas- cinated by the theory of group representations. I dabbled in the subject ...
MATHEMATICS) (V. 94). Study On the web and Download Ebook Foundations Of Differentiable Manifolds And Lie Groups (Gradua
Multiplicity free representations of finite groups - MSP
Wigner in [5] has defined a finite group & to be simply reducible if (a) every
conjugate class in ^ is self inverse and (b) for each two irreducible
representations L ...
Pacific Journal of Mathematics
MULTIPLICITY FREE REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS G EORGE W. M ACKEY
Vol. 8, No. 3
May 1958
MULTIPLICITY FREE REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS GEORGE W.
MACKEY
Introduction. Wigner in [5] has defined a finite group & to be simply reducible if (a) every conjugate class in ^ is self inverse and (b) for each two irreducible representations L and M of & the Kronecker product L(x)Λf is a direct sum of inequivalent irreducible representations. The principal result of [5] is a curious purely group theoretical characterization of simply reducible groups. For each x e ^ let v(x) denote the number of elements of g^ which commute with x and let ζ(x) denote the number of solutions of the equation y^—x. Then g 7 is simply reducible if and only if Σ*eGK#)2=Σ*eGC(#)3 As the author has shown in [3] this result may be "explained" as follows. Let gf 3 be the diagonal subgroup of ^ x 2^ x S^% that is the set of all x, y, z with x=y=z. Then it is easily seen that the number of g^3 : g^3 double cosets in & x g 7 x & is equal to Σ^e^ί^) 2 while the number of self inverse gf 3 : g^3 double cosets in ^ x gf x gf is equal to Σ*eί?C(^)3 Thus Wigner's condition is equivalent to the condition that every g? 3 : gf3 double coset be self inverse. On the other hand if iJis an arbitrary subgroup of the finite group & and U1 is the corresponding permutation representation of (U α )* is a representation of gf whose space is the dual 3, ΣCαOΓ + 1 = Σ Φ O ^ THEOREM
(b) For every positive integer n, ΣCα(^)w+L = Σ Φ ) n aeg?
*egf
(c) g^ is commutative and a is the identity. 4. Some examples. If g 7 is abelian and not every element is of order two, then the Kronecker products of irreducible representations of & are trivially multiplicity-free but Wigner's theorem does not apply since the classes in g^ are not self inverse. On the other hand, taking a to be the identity we find that Corollary 2 of Theorem 4 of the present paper does apply. A slightly less trivial example may be constructed by letting & be the direct product HxK where H is abelian, K is a group for which the equivalent conditions of Wigner's theorem are satisfied, and (£, x)a—ξf x'1. Still less trivial examples may be found by applying the following theorem : THEOREM 7. Let %? have a commutative normal subgroup N such that %?IN is of order 2. Then the Kronecker product of any two irreducible representations of ^ is multiplicity-free.
Proof. The regular representation of gf is a direct sum of the x χ representations U where U denote the representation of ^ induced by the character χ of N. Since the £7X are all two-dimensional, every χ irreducible representation of gf is either a U or is one-dimensional. Thus to prove the theorem it will suffice to show that £7Xl(x)£/2 is multiplicity-free whenever UXι and U%t are irreducible. Let β denote the unique involutory automorphism of N such that β(x)=yxy1 for allxeN and all ye%?—N. Let a denote the involutory automorphism of the character group N of N defined by β. Then (see [2]) the intertwining of U*L and if2 is equal to one, zero, or two, according as χx is equal