My data is for the period 2008-2011 (inclusive). The School's (the ... My 100 lv. (
2008-11). School 100-. 300 lv. (2011). My 100-300 lv (2008-11). Median 'Overall
...
My Teaching Evaluations Compared Visual presentation of teaching evaluation data provided to me by Victoria University of Wellington’s Centre for Academic Development. My data is for the period 2008-2011 (inclusive). The School’s (the School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations’) data is for 2011 only. My mean results are very similar to my median results. The scale labels on the survey forms:
Median 'Overall Effectiveness' Teaching Evaluation Scores (Possible Range 1.0-5.0)
1 = Excellent 2 = Very Good 3 = Good 4 = Poor 5 = Very Poor
2.1
Very Good 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1
Excellent 0.9 School 100 My 100 lv lv (2011) (2008-11)
School 100- My 100-300 300 lv lv (2008-11) (2011)
Median Teaching Evaluation Scores for 100-lv Teaching (Possible Range 1.0-5.0) 2.1 1.9
1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9
Very Good School 100 lv (2011) Median My 100 lv (2008-11) Median
Excellent
The scale labels on the survey forms: For all questions except for ‘Overall effectiveness’: 1 = Always 2 = usually 3 = Sometimes 4 = Rarely 5 = Never For ‘Overall effectiveness’: 1 = Excellent 2 = Very Good 3 = Good 4 = Poor 5 = Very Poor
Median Teaching Evaluation Scores (Possible Range 1.0-5.0) 2.1
Very Good 1.9 1.7
Clarity of communication Organisation of teaching
1.5
Stimulation of interest 1.3
Attitude towards students Overall effectiveness
1.1
Excellent 0.9 School 100 lv My 100 lv (2011) (2008-11)
School 100- My 100-300 300 lv (2011) lv (2008-11)
The scale labels on the survey forms: For all questions except for ‘Overall effectiveness’: 1 = Always 2 = usually 3 = Sometimes 4 = Rarely 5 = Never For ‘Overall effectiveness’: 1 = Excellent 2 = Very Good 3 = Good 4 = Poor 5 = Very Poor
