New species of Cerradomys from coastal sandy

Journal of Mammalogy, 92(3):645–658, 2011

New species of Cerradomys from coastal sandy plains of southeastern Brazil (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) WILLIAM CORREÂ TAVARES, LEILA MARIA PESSOÂ,*

AND

PABLO RODRIGUES GONÇALVES

Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, CCS, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Brigadeiro Trompovisk, S/N, Cidade Universita´ria, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21941-590 (WCT, LMP) Programa de Po´s-Graduaçaõ em Zoologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, s/n, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 20940-040 (WCT, LMP) Nućleo em Ecologia e Desenvolvimento Soćio-Ambiental de Macae´, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, P.O. Box 119331, Macae´, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 27971-550 (PRG) * Correspondent: [email protected] A new species of Cerradomys is described from the sandy plains of the northeastern littoral of Rio de Janeiro State and the southern littoral of Espı´rito Santo State, southeastern Brazil. Morphological and karyological characters were used to distinguish the new taxon from the 3 closest related species: C. subflavus, C. vivoi, and C. langguthi. Skull differences include the relatively larger general size, pronounced crests, broader rostrum, broader lacrimals, and wider sphenopalatine vacuities. Canonical variate analyses based on craniometric data showed that the new species has little overlap with C. subflavus, C. vivoi, and C. langguthi in multivariate space. The pelage of the new species has a unique, sparser, and thinner aspect. The diploid number of 54 chromosomes and the autosomal fundamental number of 66 arms (the highest among the 3 related species), added to the morphology of both sexual chromosomes, are diagnostic for the new species. The new taxon is restricted to a particular section of the Brazilian littoral covered by a mosaic of open vegetation locally named restingas, where it is one of the most abundant terrestrial mammals. In the restingas of this region this species is associated more with shrub patches than more forested physiognomies, being captured both on ground and on tree branches, especially of Clusia trees, suggesting a degree of arboreality. The recognition of this species adds further biogeographic uniqueness to the restingas of the northeastern littoral of Rio de Janeiro and southern littoral of Espı´rito Santo. Key words:

coastal lowland, endemism, morphometry, new species, Oryzomyini, restinga, shrubby vegetation

E 2011 American Society of Mammalogists DOI: 10.1644/10-MAMM-096.1

The diversification of the subfamily Sigmodontinae, with 84 genera and approximately 380 species, is one of the most notable radiations of mammals in the Neotropical region, accounting for a significant portion of the extant South American mammal species (D’Elıá et al. 2007; Musser and Carleton 2005; Weksler et al. 2006). Despite 2 centuries of taxonomic studies of this group, its generic and species diversity has yet to be unraveled (Pardinãs et al. 2008; Voss 1988). One of the sigmodontine groups that recently experienced profound taxonomic rearrangements, in both genera and species number, is the tribe Oryzomyini. This tribe comprises one of most diversified groups of sigmodontines, including 28 genera and about 120 valid species that are distributed mostly in the Neotropics. This high diversity has been the focus of several systematic studies in the last 3 decades, but only recently a more comprehensive review

elucidated the limits and relationships among groups of species (Weksler 2003, 2006). This effort resulted in the reallocation of several species formerly included in Oryzomys to 10 new genera (Weksler et al. 2006). The intent of this taxonomic arrangement was to provide a monophyletic classification, characters for diagnosis, and geographic distributions for each new genus. One of these genera (Cerradomys Weksler, Percequillo, and Voss, 2006) was proposed to include 4 valid species that were previously lumped under the Oryzomys subflavus group (Bonvicino and Moreira 2001; Bonvicino et al. 1999): C. maracajuensis (Langguth and Bonvicino, 2002), C. marinhus

www.mammalogy.org 645

646

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY

(Bonvicino, 2003), C. scotti (Langguth and Bonvicino, 2002), and C. subflavus (Wagner, 1842). These 4 species are known to occur mainly in biomes of open vegetation that form a diagonal belt in South America, ranging from Caatinga, Cerrado, and Pantanal in Brazil to the Chaco in Paraguay and Bolivia (D’Elıá et al. 2008; Percequillo et al. 2008; Weksler et al. 2006). More recently, the genus was reviewed and 2 additional species were described: C. vivoi Percequillo, Hingst-Zaher, and Bonvicino, 2008, and C. langguthi Percequillo, Hingst-Zaher, and Bonvicino, 2008. These 2 species also have the cores of their known distribution on a dry and open biome, the Caatinga, although they extend to the costal Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil (Percequillo et al. 2008). Despite the expressive advances in the taxonomy of Cerradomys, some questions remain, specifically regarding samples not examined in the 2 recent taxonomic revisions (Percequillo et al. 2008; Weksler et al. 2006). These samples represent populations from coastal sandy plains that are covered by distinct shrubby open vegetation communities known as restingas. The most extensive areas of restingas found in southeastern Brazil are located on the northernmost littoral of Rio de Janeiro State. These communities occur on Quaternary marine deposits contiguous to alluvial deposits from the mouth of the Paraı´ba do Sul River. Although these restingas in northeastern Rio de Janeiro State have been visited by naturalists since the 19th century, such as Charles Darwin and Maximillian Wied (Soffiati 2000), the mammal fauna of this region is still one of the most scarcely inventoried in the state (Esbe´rard and Bergallo 2005). To fill this knowledge gap recent surveys were conducted revealing new occurrences of mammals in restinga habitats, which increased the samples of poorly known taxa in the region (Bergallo et al. 2004; Pessoâ et al. 2010; Tavares et al. 2008). Among the outcomes of our field efforts initiated in 2007, we gathered regional samples of Cerradomys that could not be assigned to any other described species. Herein, we describe them as representatives of a new species based on external and cranial morphology and karyological data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS As a part of a broader effort to survey mammalian fauna in lowland areas of the northernmost coastal region of Rio de Janeiro State we have been conducting a series of collecting expeditions to the restingas near the mouth of the Paraı´ba do Sul River since October 2007. These expeditions totaled 1,904 trap nights and resulted in 25 collected specimens of Cerradomys among 37 small rodents of 4 species. Twentyfour specimens were prepared as dry skull and skins, and 1 specimen was fluid-preserved. All were deposited in the mammal collection of the Museu Nacional (MN), Rio de Janeiro. In addition to this material we examined other exemplars collected in the same region, previously identified as Oryzomys gr. subflavus (Bergallo et al. 2004, 2005). Field procedures and the treatments applied to collected specimens were in accordance with guidelines of the American Society of

Vol. 92, No. 3

Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research (Gannon et al. 2007). Because of higher morphological and karyological similarity of these specimens with the species C. subflavus, C. vivoi, and C. langguthi, this study is based primarily on comparisons implemented with these 3 species. All specimens examined are deposited in 2 Brazilian collections, MN, Rio de Janeiro, and Museu de Biologia Professor Mello Leitaõ (MBML), Espı´rito Santo. The analyzed specimens and their collecting localities are listed in Appendix I. Anatomical terminology used in qualitative descriptions of external, cranial, mandibular, and dental characters follows that used by Carleton and Musser (1989), Musser et al. (1998), Voss (1988), and Voss et al. (2002). Fifteen measurements were taken from each skull using a digital caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. In the field external measurements were taken (mm) with a ruler, and mass was taken (g) with a dynamometer. Most measurements analyzed in the present study are in concordance with those used in the latest taxonomic review of the genus (Percequillo et al. 2008); the only 2 exceptions (BL and CZL) have abbreviations marked below with an asterisk and are redefined as follows. External measurements were body length (BL*: from the rostrum to the base of tail); length of tail (TL); pinna length (Ear); length of hind foot (HF); and mass (Wt). Skull and dental measurements were condyloincisive length (CIL), length of diastema (LD), length of molars (LM), breadth of M1 (BM1), length of incisive foramen (LIF), palatal breadth (PB), breadth of rostrum (BR), length of nasals (LN), length of palatal bridge (LPB), height of braincase (HB), least interorbital breadth (LIB), zygomatic breadth (ZB), condylozygomatic length (CZL*: from the occipital condyle to the anteriormost edge of the zygomatic notch), orbital fossa length (OFL), and bullar breadth (BB). We considered specimens to be adults when all molars had erupted and showed signs of tooth wear. Only adult specimens were used in morphometric analysis, and males and females were pooled. Univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the null hypothesis of equal character means among samples from 4 species (Manly 1994; Sokal and Rohlf 1981). The post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used for pairwise comparisons (Sokal and Rohlf 1981). Residuals from all analyses were tested for normality. Departures from normality were analyzed graphically to verify the ANOVA assumption of homoscedasticity (Stevens 1992). The exploratory principal component analysis was used to identify the main sources of variation in the total sample and depict the cluster of individuals in the multivariate space. The confirmatory discriminant function analysis was used to determine the percent correct allocation of individuals in their groups defined a priori. Canonical variate analysis was used to depict these groups in multivariate space and identify which characters contribute most to the discrimination among them (Manly 1994; Sokal and Rohlf 1981). All statistical treatments

June 2011

TAVARES ET AL.—A NEW SPECIES OF CERRADOMYS

647

FIG. 1.—Locality records of Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. in Rio de Janeiro (RJ) and Espı´rito Santo (ES) states in southeastern Brazil. Numbers correspond to localities listed in Appendix I.

applied to quantitative data were implemented with the software package of Statistica version 8.0 (StatSoft, Inc. 2007). Techniques used to obtain chromosome preparations from femoral medullae and to stain with Giemsa conventional coloration were applied to 23 specimens as described by Ford and Hamerton (1956). The chromosomes were classified in accordance with the arms ratio criterion proposed by Levan et al. (1964). Conventionally stained chromosomes were ordered 1st according to morphology and 2nd according to decreasing size.

RESULTS Cerradomys goytaca, New Species Holotype.—MN 73177, an adult male collected by the authors on 22 September 2008 (field number LMP 365). The specimen consists of skin, skull and postcranial skeleton. Additionally, a sample of liver tissue is preserved in ethanol and sample of femoral medullar tissue is preserved in methanol and acetic acid solution. Type locality.—Parque Nacional Restinga de Jurubatiba, municipality of Carapebus, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22u159280S, 41u399490W, 1 m altitude (Fig. 1, locality 5). Paratypes.—Five specimens collected by authors at the type locality in September 2008 are designated as paratypes: the females MN 73172 and 73174 and the males MN 73180, 73183, and 73191. They consist of skulls, skins, and postcranial skeletons.

Distribution.—Known from the type locality in the Parque Nacional Restinga de Jurubatiba, which extends 42 km along the coastline of municipalities of Macae´, Carapebus, and Quissama˜ in Rio de Janeiro State. C. goytaca sp. nov. is also recorded in 4 other nearby localities northeastward to Praia das Neves, 133 km from the type locality, in the southernmost limit of Espı´rito Santo State (Fig. 1). All known collecting localities are within restinga geological and vegetational formations. Etymology.—The specific epithet is in honor of the extinct local ethnic group uetaka´ (as presented by Jean de Le´ry in 1578—Le´ry 1961), also known as Goytaca´. These native people lived along lowlands from the northern margin of the Macae´ River to Espı´rito Santo State, a distribution that is similar to the known geographic range of the rodent described here. The Goytacazes, whose braveness was repeatedly alluded to by European voyagers since the 16th century (e.g., Le´ry 1961; Staden 1974), probably were more closely related to indigenous people from the Brazilian interior (Lamego 1974a, 1974b), being markedly distinct from the surrounding Indians of the Tupi linguistic branch, which occupied almost all of the Brazilian littoral around the beginning of Portuguese colonization. Diagnosis.—Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. can be characterized by the following set of morphological and karyological characters: medium body size; dorsal body color orange grizzled with brown, with relatively short hairs; head color grayish, especially laterally around the eyes and cheeks; whitish venter where hairs are short, sparse, and have pale gray to pale brownish gray base; tail markedly bicolored, with

648


TABLE 1.—Descriptive statistics of 4 external measurements (mm) and mass (g) of a sample of 23 adult specimens of Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. Males and females were pooled in morphometric analysis. Min 5 minimum; max 5 maximum. See ‘‘Materials and Methods’’ for definitions of measurements. Measurement BL TL Ear HF Wt

¯ X 6 SD

Range (min–max)

6 6 6 6 6

116–166 130–181 19–24 30–34 54–130

142.90 162.74 21 32.04 98.01

13.27 12.64 1.20 1.36 18.78

completely unpigmented hairs and scales on the ventral surface in its proximal portion in most specimens; large tail scales (presence of a modal number of 7 scales per 5 mm in the proximal quarter of the tail length); ungual hair tufts over claws rarely exceeding claw length; skull large and robust, with broad rostrum, broad lacrimal bones, wide zygomatic arches, prominent supraorbital ridges that extend almost to the occipital crest, deep palatal fossae with complex and broad posteropalatal pits, roof of mesopterygoid fossa with wide and large sphenopalatine vacuities extending broadly along the presphenoid and alisphenoid (exposing orbitosphenoid), alisphenoid strut absent, small posterior opening of the alisphenoid canal, relatively narrower upper molars; chromosomal formulae diploid number (2n) 5 54, autosomal fundamental number (FNa) 5 66, with a large acrocentric pair and 4 small biarmed pairs in the autosomal complement, a large X subtelocentric chromosome, and a medium Y acrocentric chromosome. External morphology.—Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. is a medium-sized rat with a tail longer than combined lengths of head and body (Table 1). The upper parts of adults are orange grizzled with brown, darker along the back and paler along the sides of the body. Black guard hairs are distributed along all of the dorsum but concentrated in the middorsal region. Underparts are whitish gray with limits moderately demarcated from the sides of the body. The dorsum of the head has the same color as the dorsum of the body, but the anterior half of the head is paler and slightly grayish. The region around each eye is more grayish than the dorsum head color. Cheeks are cream to grayish white. Pinnae are pinkish in live individuals, becoming brown in prepared skins, with a darker coloration near their edges, with inner surface covered by orange and whitish short hairs, and outer surface being covered with orange to brownish short hairs. Body dorsal pelage is short and dense, lead gray basally. Wool hairs are gray basally and orange on the tip. Middorsal guard hairs are black or dark brown in the distal half; some guard hairs have short orange tips on the outer thighs and on the sides of the body. Cover hairs are gray basally and orange in the distal part. Sometimes the distal part of cover hairs shows a brownish tip. Hairs on the underparts are texturally distinct because they are shorter and slightly more sparsely distributed than dorsal pelage and are chromatically distinct because they are white

Vol. 92, No. 3

on the distal half (or more) and are gray or brownish gray basally. On the underparts the darker basal band is always much paler and shorter than in the dorsal hairs. Sometimes, on circumgenital and chin regions hairs are completely white. One or 2 of the longest mystacial vibrissae extend a little beyond the posterior edges of ears when laid back against the head, but most reach the middle level of the ears (or less). Two, or rarely 3, superciliary vibrissae are present on each side; the longest one usually reaches the middle level of ear. One genal vibrissae, rarely none or 2, on each side, frequently extends a little beyond the posterior edges of the ears. Dorsal mystacial vibrissae are black basally and white or translucid at the tip; ventral mystacial vibrissae are entirely white and smaller than dorsal ones. The tail is finely scaled, covered with short hairs, and strongly bicolored with the dorsal surface brownish and ventral surface whitish in part of its length. This dorsoventral color pattern is due to the differential pigmentation on both scales and hairs. Near the base of the tail scales are arranged in an easily visible annular series and are grayish brown on the dorsum and unpigmented on the venter; dorsal hairs are dark brownish, and all ventral hair is completely unpigmented; extension of the unpigmented ventral area varies from the 1st proximal one-fifth of the tail to almost its complete length. The distal one-third of the tail is darker than the proximal portion, even on the dorsal surface. The tip of the tail is covered by short, dark brownish hairs. Three hairs are inserted under each tail scale: a long median one and 2 smaller ones; the length of median hair frequently reaches the edge of the 2nd subsequent scale. In prepared museum skins it is possible to count an average of 6 series of scales per 5 mm of tail length along the 1st one-fifth of the tail. ¯ HF 5 32.04; SDHF 5 1.36), Hind feet are narrow and long (X with middle digits (II, III, and IV) longer than outer ones (I and V). Plantar surfaces are dark brown, naked from the heel to the tips of the digits, and bear 6 moderately fleshy plantar pads. Plantar surface is rough due the presence of distinct ‘‘squamae’’ (scalelike turbecules—sensu Voss et al. 2002), primarily among pads on the center of the soles; from the thenar and hypothenar to the heel, the plantar surface is smoother. Dorsal and lateral surfaces of the metatarsal region and digits are unpigmented and covered with short white hairs, which have a narrow brown basal band. Claws are short and unpigmented, covered by whitish ungual hair tufts that rarely exceed claw length. As in hind feet, forefeet are naked on the palmar surface and covered with short, whitish hair on the dorsal surface, but both plantar and dorsal areas are unpigmented. The pollex is a diminutive digit and bears a little rounded nail, whereas other digits are longer and bear claws covered by whitish hair tufts that slightly exceed the claw length. Digit III and IV have similar lengths and are the longest ones, followed by the digits II and IV. The palmar surface is rough due to the presence of distinct squamae and bears 5 moderately fleshy palmar pads. Females have 4 pairs of mammae: 1 pectoral, 1 axillar, 1 abdominal, and 1 inguinal pair.

June 2011


Skull morphology.—The cranium is large and wide with well-marked ridges on the overall shape, even in young adults (Fig. 2). Nasal dimensions are proportional to skull size, extending caudally until the level of the lacrimal bones. The suture between the frontals and nasals is straight or slightly curved. The region among the frontal, maxilla, and lacrimals is slightly depressed, giving the last bone an upward projection. Lacrimal bones are broad and well developed, sutured both to the maxillary and frontal bones. Supraorbital ridges converge anteriorly, are very well developed, forming upward-curved flanges over the orbits and extending sharply until the lambdoidal ridge. The interparietal is short in its anteroposterior axis, with a semicircular posterior margin. The occipital ridge well developed. The anterior border of the zygomatic plate is straight and projected forward, reaching the nasolacrimal capsule and delineating a deep and well-incised zygomatic notch. The incisive foramen is long (averaging about 73% of length of the diastema) but not reaching the level of the anterior limit of the alveolus of M1, varying from ellipsoid in most specimens to slightly narrowed anteriorly and broadened posteriorly in a few exemplars. The septum of the incisive foramen is keeled on almost all of its extension, especially on the premaxillary portion. The palate is wide, with its limit at the posterior plane of M3. Palatal pits vary in number. Posteropalatal pits are frequently broad and divided. Palatal excrescences exhibit variable development. The mesopterygoid fossa is rounded, extending anteriorly between the maxillaries or to the level of M3 in adults. Most of mesopterygoid roof is perforated by long and wide sphenopalatine vacuities on the basisphenoid and presphenoid bones, leaving the orbitosphenoid visible under ventral view. Alisphenoid strut is absent, with the buccinators–masticatory foramen and foramen ovale acessorius confluent. The posterior opening of the alisphenoid canal is relatively small (remarkably smaller than the occlusal surface of M3). The postglenoid fenestra is larger than the subsquamosal foramen. Tegmen tympani do not contact the squamosal bone in most specimens; in a few specimens this contact occurs through a narrow area of the squamosal. The suspensory process of the squamosal bone is absent. Auditory bullae are globular in shape with a large, inflated ectotympanic and a reduced periotic. The stapedial foramen and posterior opening of alisphenoid canal are small, and the squamosal–alisphenoid groove and sphenofrontal foramen absent, giving evidence of a derived carotid pattern (state 3—sensu Voss 1988). Morphology of the processes on the dentary is variable in this species. The coronoid process is often falciform and markedly curved posteriorly, but rarely tending to be triangular, being higher than or at the same level as the condyloid process. The extension of the angular process of the dentary varies from beyond to before the posterior edge of the condylar process. The mandibular foramen is variable in size, positioned halfway between the coronoid and condylar processes, and is above the level of inferior molar series. Dental morphology.—Incisors are opistodont with enamel bands orange and smoothly rounded, without grooves or labial

649

FIG. 2.—Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull and lateral view of the mandible of Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. holotype (MN 73177, field number LMP 365) from Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba, Carapebus, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

bevels. Upper molar series are arranged in parallel. Upper and lower molars are pentalophodont and crested, showing main cusps arranged in opposite pairs (Fig. 3). Upper labial flexi and lower lingual flexi penetrate the occlusal surface, curving at the median plane of molars with their median edges slightly superposed; the paraflexi(d), mesoflexi(d), metaflexi, posteroflexi(d), and entoflexid are all closed off at the crown margin by lateral cingula (Fig. 3). The M1 has a squared and relatively narrow procingulum and lacks an anteromedian flexus; an anteromedian internal fold is present in the procingulum together with a narrow anteroflexus and a well-developed anteroloph; the antero-

650


FIG. 3.—Molar series of Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. MN 73208. Left: upper molars series; right: lower molar series.

median fold is coalesced with the anteroflexus in younger individuals; the protostyle is absent; the paracone median enamel border contacts the middle portion of the protocone; the mesoloph is long and narrow, reaching the labial margin of M1, and is fused with the mesostyle; in adult specimens the mesoloph is connected to the paracone at its middle portion through a narrow paralophule (sensu Pardinãs 2008)—a posterolabial enamel projection that stems from the paracone, dividing the mesoflexus into a labial shallow fold and a medial large central enamel fossette; in younger individuals these 2 enamel structures are coalesced into a contiguous mesoflexus, and the mesoloph is completely isolated from the paracone, as the paralophule appears only as a reduced projection; the metacone is connected posteromedially to a narrow posteroloph; 3 major roots are located in anterior, lingual, and posterolabial positions, and 1 accessory rootlet is situated on the labial side. M2 is squared in shape; a narrow anteroloph and a shallow protoflexus are present; the mesoloph is well developed and fused with the mesostyle; the paralophule is fused with the mesoloph, delimiting a very reduced labial flexus and a large and transversally oriented central fossette, which occupies most of the central occlusal surface of M2 and separates the protocone from the paracone; younger individuals tend to show a reduced paralophule that does not divide the mesoflexus; the median mure of M2 is similar to that of M1, with the metacone posteromedially connected to the

Vol. 92, No. 3

posteroloph; 3 major roots are arranged in anterior, lingual, and posterolabial positions with no accessory rootlets. M3 is small and triangular in shape, with a very reduced hypocone and metacone; an anteroloph is present; the hypoflexus is well defined; the mesoloph is long and completely isolated from the paracone; the paralophule is much reduced, not dividing the mesoflexus; a large medial enamel fossette is present separating the protocone from the paracone; a posteroflexus is still discernible in adults delimiting a reduced posteroloph (Fig. 3). Lower m1 has a narrow and quadrangular procingulum, lacking an anteromedian flexid in the anteroconid; an anteromedian fossettid is present, and it remains isolated from the protoflexid even in younger individuals; the anterolophid and protolophid are completely absent in adults and very reduced in young individuals; the anteroflexid and protoflexid are deep, defining a narrow and longitudinally oriented anterior murid; the mesolophid coalesces extensively with the entoconid, isolated from the paraconid by a deep mesoflexid; the entoflexid is present as a medial enamel fossette; in young individuals, however, a well-defined mesolophid stems from the diagonal median mure, being separated from the paraconid by a deep entoflexid; an ectolophid is present; the posteroflexid and posterolophid are well pronounced and diagonally oriented; 2 major roots are located in anterior and posterior positions and 1 accessory root is present on the lingual side. The m2 is similar to m1, but with the anterolabial cingulum and protoflexid as the sole procingulum structures still present; the ectolophid is greatly reduced, even in young specimens; 2 roots are present. m3 is slightly smaller than m2; the anterolabial cingulum developed and a protoflexid is present; the mesoloph is present and completely isolated from the paraconid by a deep mesoflexid; the entoflexid and posteroflexid are reduced to internal enamel islands; the entoconid is considerably reduced; the ectolophid is absent; 2 major roots are present (Fig. 3). Karyology.—Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. shows a diploid number (2n) of 54 chromosomes and autosomal fundamental number (FNa) of 66 autosomal arms. The karyotype complement comprises 7 metacentric and submetacentric pairs and 19 acrocentric pairs of chromosomes. It is remarkable that among biarmed chromosomes 3 pairs are distinctly larger. Among acrocentric autosomal pairs 1 is clearly larger, whereas the other 18 vary subtly from medium to small-sized. The X chromosome is a large-sized subtelocentric, and the Y is a medium acrocentric (Fig. 4). Qualitative morphological comparisons.—Comparing gross external morphology among Cerradomys species, it is possible to depict 2 distinct assemblages of similar species. The 1st one includes rats with a homogenous olivaceous dorsal pelage that does not contrast abruptly with ventral coloration, which is yellowish buff. This group comprises C. scotti, C. maracajuensis, and C. marinhus. Species of the 2nd assemblage present orange dorsal body coloration with grayish tones on the anterior portion of the head, mainly around the eyes, contrasting with the whitish ventral surface of the body. This

June 2011


FIG. 4.—Karyotype of a male Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. (2n 5 54, FNa 5 66) prepared with conventional staining with Giemsa. The specimen is the paratype MN 73180 from the type locality.

last group includes C. langguthi, C. subflavus, C. vivoi, and C. goytaca sp. nov. described here. This last assemblage also presents a relatively shorter dorsal and ventral fur, a condition also present in C. scotti but not in C. maracajuensis and C. marinhus. The 2 species assemblages also are differentiated by at least 1 cranial trait. All species in the 1st group have a relatively large posterior opening of the alisphenoid canal, whereas species from the 2nd group have a smaller opening (area similar or smaller than the M3 occlusal surface). The 3 species included in the 2nd assemblage have been recovered as a monophyletic group (C. langguthi [C. vivoi + C. subflavus]) in the molecular phylogenetic analyses presented by Percequillo et al. (2008). This suggests that the greater morphological similarity among the species of this group might reflect common ancestry. Although molecular data are not available for C. goytaca sp. nov., it shares a set of morphological traits with these species and seems to be closely related to them. Therefore, herein we shall focus our comparisons among C. goytaca sp. nov., C. subflavus, C. vivoi, and C. langguthi. Detailed examinations of external characters of pelage and tail are useful to differentiate C. goytaca sp. nov. from the other 3 species. C. goytaca sp. nov. shows a sparser and thinner pelage, especially on the ventral surface where unpigmented skin is evident through the sparse ventral hairs. Ventral hairs in C. goytaca sp. nov. tend to be paler, with basal zones less pigmented and narrower. Following this trend, some specimens have completely whitish ventral hairs, a condition not found in the other 3 species. The ventral scales and hairs of the most proximal one-fourth of the tail are distinctively unpigmented in C. goytaca sp. nov. Only the distal one-fourth of the tail is conspicuously darker in ventral view, whereas in the other 3 species, this darker region extends around distal two-fourths or three-fourths. Despite the presence of extensive intraspecific variation, tails of these last 3 species tend to be more hirsute than that of C. goytaca sp. nov. The tail scales of C. goytaca sp. nov. are larger than in

651

other species, presenting a modal number of 7 scales per 5 mm in proximal one-fourth of tail while the other 3 species tend to present 8 or 9 scales per 5 mm. Skull morphology also provides relevant characters to diagnose the new species. Lacrimal bones of C. goytaca sp. nov. are distinctively broad and posterolaterally expanded, whereas in other species these structures are diminutive and sometimes absent, even in the largest specimens. In C. goytaca sp. nov. sphenopalatine vacuities are very long and wide, occupying much of the presphenoid and basisphenoid and exposing the orbitosphenoid, a condition more similar to some specimens of C. vivoi. In contrast, the vacuities are reduced and mostly restricted to the presphenoid in C. langguthi and C. subflavus. Some additional cranial differences among the species are related to size variation. Among these are the pronounced supraorbital and lambdoidal crests of C. goytaca sp. nov., which are more similar to the oldest specimens of C. subflavus, contrasting with the slender crests of the smaller C. vivoi and especially C. langguthi. Craniometric analysis.—Adult specimens of C. goytaca sp. nov. have the largest body and skull dimensions in comparison with most similar congeneric species (Table 2). Most skull and dental measurements vary significantly between C. goytaca sp. nov. and the other 3 species. All 15 cranial characters show significant differences among species. Eleven characters vary significantly in pairwise comparisons between C. goytaca sp. nov. and C. vivoi, 9 are significantly different between C. goytaca sp. nov. and C. langguthi, and 5 are significantly different between C. goytaca sp. nov. and C. subflavus. Among the most relevant morphometric characters to distinguish C. goytaca sp. nov. from the other 3 species, the breadth of rostrum (BR) showed the largest amount of interspecific variation (F3,72 5 24.46; Table 2). C. goytaca ¯ BR 5 7.42; SDBR 5 sp. nov. shows a very wide rostrum (X 0.38), which is significantly wider than that of C. subflavus ¯ BR 5 6.86 mm; SDBR 5 0.43), C. langguthi (X ¯ BR 5 6.69; (X ¯ BR 5 6.52; SDBR 5 0.30). SDBR 5 0.38), and C. vivoi (X Despite the significant interspecific differences shown by most skull characters, intraspecific variation is detectable in almost all of them, especially due to ontogenetic variation, with the exception of the length of molar series (LM) and breadth of 1st molar (BM1). LMs are similar among C. goytaca sp. nov., C. subflavus, and C. langguthi but significantly larger than in C. vivoi. In contrast, the width of M1 of C. goytaca sp. nov. is similar to that of C. vivoi but significantly narrower than in C. subflavus and C. langguthi (Table 2). The patterns of craniometric variation among the species were further analyzed with the multivariate analyses of principal component analysis and canonical variate analysis. The 1st axis of the principal component analysis accounts for 58.7% of total detected variation. Given that all characters are correlated negatively with this axis, it depicts variation in overall skull size. The 2nd axis accounts for 11.3% of total

8.56*** 16.09*** 8.45*** 10.46*** 10.08*** 11.46*** 24.46*** 3.529* 2.83* 7.03*** 12.73*** 7.03*** 6.59*** 20.98*** 3.33* 30.72–34.91 8.94–10.65 4.75–5.28 1.38–1.57 6.54–7.54 5.45–6.60 6.18–7.61 12.47–15.00 5.40–6.85 9.02–9.96 5.18–6.23 17.28–19.77 24.38–27.58 11.25–12.71 4.68–5.46 1.23 0.50 0.13 0.06 0.31 0.30 0.38 0.68 0.34 0.28 0.29 0.68 0.96 0.44 0.19 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 32.73*** 9.59*** 4.97 1.49* 6.98*** 6.11 6.69*** 13.79 5.98 9.45*** 5.83*** 18.23 26.13** 11.88*** 5.23 30.72–36.30 8.66–10.88 4.76–5.53 1.40–1.59 6.18–7.79 5.86–6.92 6.13–7.52 11.58–14.82 5.24–6.81 9.12–10.79 5.26–7.02 16.95–20.10 24.54–29.58 11.49–13.70 4.95–5.98 1.65 0.60 0.18 0.06 0.40 0.32 0.43 0.91 0.39 0.47 0.40 0.89 1.44 0.65 0.26 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 33.37 9.66*** 5.11 1.51** 7.14** 6.39 6.86*** 13.56 6.01 9.96 6.05* 18.60 26.88 12.61 5.39 31.60–35.51 9.17–10.42 4.67–5.20 1.35–1.51 6.59–7.74 5.05–6.24 5.81–7.38 12.11–15.33 5.15–6.50 9.11–10.68 5.20–6.94 17.15–19.21 25.22–28.18 11.61–12.84 4.88–5.68 0.82 0.32 0.11 0.04 0.29 0.26 0.30 0.82 0.33 0.36 0.39 0.47 0.64 0.27 0.18 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 32.31–37.18 9.85–11.82 4.79–6.29 1.29–1.65 7.03–8.70 5.79–6.93 6.75–8.10 13.14–15.31 5.66–6.74 9.20–11.17 5.88–7.20 17.27–20.44 25.43–29.31 12.03–13.84 4.95–5.58 34.44 10.55 5.10 1.44 7.57 6.25 7.42 14.18 6.15 9.98 6.39 18.83 27.41 12.88 5.31

1.32 0.54 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.29 0.38 0.66 0.27 0.45 0.37 0.81 1.15 0.46 0.16 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 CIL LD LM BM1 LIF PB BR LN LPB HB LIB ZB CZL OFL BB

32.76*** 9.87*** 4.85*** 1.42 7.29 5.86*** 6.52*** 13.60* 5.86* 9.75 5.77*** 17.88*** 26.22** 12.04*** 5.21

Min–max ¯ X 6 SD Min–max

C. subflavus (n 5 16)

¯ X 6 SD Min–max

C. vivoi (n 5 21)

¯ X 6 SD Min–max ¯ X 6 SD

C. goytaca sp. nov. (n 5 23)

Vol. 92, No. 3

TABLE 3.—Results of principal component (PC) analysis using adult specimens of 4 species of Cerradomys: C. goytaca sp. nov. (n 5 23), C. subflavus (n 5 15), C. vivoi (n 5 20), and C. langguthi (n 5 17). See ‘‘Materials and Methods’’ for definitions of measurements. Eigenvectors

Measurement

C. langguthi (n 5 17)

ANOVA F3,72

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY TABLE 2.—Descriptive statistics of skull and dental measurements of 4 species of Cerradomys and results of ANOVA. After arithmetic mean value of each character the level of significance of the difference between C. goytaca sp. nov. and the other species is indicated as obtained by the post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference test. Min 5 minimum; max 5 maximum. See ‘‘Materials and Methods’’ for definitions of measurements. Significance levels: * P , 0.05, ** P , 0.01, *** P , 0.001.

652

Measurement

PC1

PC2

PC3

CIL LD LM BM1 LIF PB BR LN LPB HB LIB ZB CZL OFL BB

20.2604 20.3443 20.1165 20.0127 20.2353 20.1903 20.4240 20.2681 20.2538 20.1967 20.3709 20.2410 20.2568 20.2742 20.1296

0.0279 0.2662 20.2322 20.4803 0.4801 20.5502 20.0075 0.0654 20.2765 20.0002 0.0358 20.0823 0.0010 0.0252 20.1450

0.0930 0.2625 20.1426 20.0964 0.0849 0.1457 20.1065 0.3418 0.4605 20.1435 20.6871 20.0067 0.0781 20.0985 20.1250

0.0252 58.7

0.0048 11.3

0.0024 5.5

Eigenvalue % variance

variation and can be interpreted as depicting shape variation, because the direction of correlation varies among characters (Table 3). When the individual scores are plotted against the first 2 axes, it is possible to note considerable overlap among species (Fig. 5A). Nevertheless, C. goytaca sp. nov. and C. subflavus present the smallest scores on principal component 1 (PC1), given their larger skull size. The 3 characters that most contributed to variation in PC1 were the BR followed by the least interorbital breadth (LIB) and length of diastema (LD; Table 3). The 4 Cerradomys species included in principal component analysis also overlapped along the 2nd axis of variation (Fig. 5A). C. langguthi and C. subflavus present the lowest scores in PC2, and C. goytaca sp. nov. and C. vivoi display the highest scores. The characters that contributed most to variation in PC2 were palatal breadth (PB) and BM1, which were correlated negatively with it, followed by length of incisive foramen (LIF), which was positively correlated with it (Table 3). In a canonical variate analysis C. goytaca sp. nov. clearly diverges from the other 3 species, barely overlapping with them along the first 2 canonical axes (CV1 and CV2; Fig. 5B), which summarize 81.0% of variation analyzed (Table 4). Along CV1 the overlap among C. vivoi, C. subflavus, and C. langguthi is much more expressive than the overlap among these species and C. goytaca sp. nov. Zygomatic breadth (ZB) and BR were the characters that most contributed to separation of species along CV1, and LD and condylozygomatic length (CZL) contributed to species discrimination along CV2 and CV3, respectively (Table 4). The calculated discriminant function could correctly predict the specific allocation of all specimens of C. goytaca sp. nov., but correct allocation of the other 3 species varied from 87.5% to 95.0% (Table 5).

June 2011


653

FIG. 5.—Individual specimen scores of species of Cerradomys plotted on A, B) multivariate and C, D) bivariate spaces. A) First principal component (PC1) 3 2nd principal component (PC2); B) 1st canonical variate (CV1) 3 2nd canonical variate (CV2); C) condylozygomatic length (CZL) 3 breadth of rostrum (BR); and D) length of diastema (LD) 3 zygomatic breadth (ZB). C. langguthi is included only in graphics A and B. The marked convex polygons enclose all observations of C. goytaca sp. nov.

In a bivariate plot of CZL versus BR, despite the wide overlap in overall skull size, at an equivalent CZL C. goytaca sp. nov. has a wider rostrum than the other species (Table 2; Fig. 5C); only 2 specimens (12.5%) of C. subflavus and a single specimen (4.8%) of C. vivoi lie within the C. goytaca sp. nov. cluster. This quantitative dissimilarity is due to the remarkably inflated nasolacrimal capsules of C. goytaca sp. nov. In another bivariate plot (Fig. 5D), for equivalent length of the diastema C. goytaca sp. nov. tends to have zygomatic arches that are wider than those of C. subflavus but relatively similar to those of C. vivoi. In this plot only a single specimen (6.2%) of C. subflavus lies within the C. goytaca sp. nov. cluster, whereas ,43% of C. vivoi specimens lie within it. Karyological comparisons.—Species within the genus Cerradomys show remarkable karyological differences and, as observed by Percequillo et al. (2008), they can be diagnosed by diploid or autosomal fundamental numbers, or both, and also by the morphology of autosomes and the sexual chromosomes. Recognized diploid and autosomal fundamen-

tal numbers of the genus, including C. langguthi (2n 5 46, 48– 50, FNa 5 56), C. vivoi (2n 5 50, FNa 5 62–64), and C. subflavus (2n 5 54–56, FNa 5 62–63), have shown these differences (Almeida and Yonenaga-Yassuda 1985; AndradesMiranda et al. 2002; Langguth and Bonvicino 2002; Maia and Hulak 1981; Percequillo et al. 2008). The diploid number of 54 chromosomes and the highest autosomal fundamental number of 66 autosomal arms are diagnostic for C. goytaca sp. nov. when compared with other species within the clade that included C. subflavus, C. langguthi, and C.vivoi (Percequillo et al. 2008). Most samples of C. subflavus and C. goytaca sp. nov. share the same diploid number, but several traits of morphology and composition of the autosomal complement can differentiate the karyotype of this new species from all others previously described within the genus. Known karyomorphs from Saõ Paulo State assigned to C. subflavus bear 2 large biarmed autosomal pairs (Almeida and Yonenaga-Yassuda 1985), differing from the 3 large biarmed pairs found in samples of

654


TABLE 4.—Results of canonical variate (CV) analysis using 72 adult specimens of 4 species of Cerradomys. See ‘‘Materials and Methods’’ for definitions of measurements.

TABLE 5.—Results of prediction of species allocations based on discriminant function analysis using 72 adult specimens of 4 species of Cerradomys.

Canonical variate Measurement

CV1

CV2

CV3

CIL LD LM BM1 LIF PB BR LN LPB HB LIB ZB CZL OFL BB

0.3399 20.4198 20.3191 0.3142 20.2438 20.4630 20.9789 0.3730 0.1926 20.4349 20.2615 11.820 0.6562 20.9324 0.1074

0.7037 216.833 0.0605 0.3573 0.3501 0.6857 20.0370 20.1437 20.0420 20.2023 0.0686 0.6009 20.6349 0.6714 0.1061

11.293 0.1857 0.0326 0.0670 20.2250 20.0904 0.8270 0.0350 0.1379 210.740 0.2884 10.335 214.433 20.8512 20.1695

28.885 48.8

19.654 33.2

10.632 18.0

Eigenvalue % variance

C. subflavus from Minas Gerais, C. vivoi, and C. goytaca sp. nov. (Percequillo et al. 2008). However, the new species has a pair of large acrocentric chromosomes that has no recognizable counterpart in the complement of C. subflavus from Minas Gerais, whereas a remarkably similar large acrocentric pair also is found in C. vivoi and some samples from Saõ Paulo. At least 2 small biarmed pairs appear to be conservative in C. goytaca sp. nov., C. subflavus, and C. vivoi. Two medium to large-sized biarmed pairs also are present in C. vivoi but not in the other 2 species. The absence of these 2 biarmed pairs suggests some similarity among C. goytaca sp. nov. and C. subflavus. Among the most similar species, a diagnostic characteristic in C. goytaca sp. nov. autosomal complement is the presence of 2 small submetacentric pairs in addition to 2 small metacentric pairs, whereas in C. vivoi and C. subflavus only 2 pairs of small metacentric chromosomes are present. C. langguthi resembles C. goytaca sp. nov. in this trait because it has 3 small biarmed pairs of chromosomes; however, in overall karyotype (including diploid number and autosomal fundamental number) these 2 species are remarkably dissimilar. For both C. vivoi and C. subflavus the X chromosome was described as a medium-sized acrocentric, whereas the Y is a small-sized acrocentric, one of the smallest in the complement (Percequillo et al. 2008). By contrast, the X of C. goytaca sp. nov. is a large-sized subtelocentric and the Y is a mediumsized acrocentric. These differences may be used as karyological diagnosis of the new species within the genus. Natural history.—Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. is one of the most abundant small mammal species in the restingas of Jurubatiba National Park, occurring in most phytophysiognomies found in the area. Nevertheless, C. goytaca sp. nov.

Vol. 92, No. 3

C. C. C. C.

goytaca vivoi subflavus langguthi

Total

No. specimens allocated to species

% of correct allocation

1

2

3

4

100.0 95.0 87.5 94.1

23 0 0 1

0 19 1 0

0 0 14 0

0 1 1 16

94.7

24

20

14

18

apparently exhibits higher densities in the open restinga shrublands that are distributed as vegetation islands throughout the sandy plains. These islands are of various sizes (2.84– 1,348.1 m2) and are composed of plant species that show remarkable abilities to colonize and survive arid habitats (Arau´jo et al. 1998; Bergallo et al. 2004, 2005). Among these, Clusia hilariana (Cluseaceae) is the largest tree that usually develops in the center of the largest patches, providing a dense litter and shade cover. The borders of the patches are dominated by the bromeliads Aechmea nudicaulis and Neoregelia cruenta, the tree scrub Protium icicariba (Burseraceae), the cactus Cereus fernanbucensis, and the geophytic palm Allagoptera arenaria (Arecaceae), which combine to form a dense and closed herbaceous cover (Arau´jo et al. 1998; Scarano et al. 2004). Captures of C. goytaca sp. nov. occurred in the interior and in the bordering portions of the Clusia patches, and this species seems to be most abundant mammal residing in this physiognomy (Bergallo et al. 2005). Specimens of C. goytaca sp. nov. also were collected in the forests that develop in more humid terrain and near lagoons, although other mammal species are apparently more common in these habitats, such as the didelphid marsupials Micoureus paraguayanus and Didelphis aurita (Bergallo et al. 2004). Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. plays an important role as seed predator of the palm Allagoptera arenaria in the type locality, where about 24% of examined fruits were damaged and showed tooth marks of this rodent (Grenha et al. 2010). The new species also acts as a seed disperser, burying some uneaten fruits of the palm in restinga soil (Grenha et al. 2010). During consecutive nights we captured some specimens at 1.5–2.0 m above the ground, evidence of a certain degree of arboreality for C. goytaca sp. nov. In Grussai 2 individuals were captured within nests on tree branches in July 2010 (R. M. de Araujo, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, pers. comm.). Nests of the species also were found in tangled bromeliads (Bergallo et al. 2005), and it is possible that dense litter also is used as shelter. Pregnant females captured by us in April and September contained up to 4 embryos. Martins-Hatano et al. (2001) summarized data on development of C. goytaca sp. nov., based on litters from 2 females maintained in captivity. Observed litter sizes were of 4 and 5 individuals. Openings of the eyes and external ears occur between 4 and 9 days after

June 2011


parturition. Males and females presented no dimorphism in size in the 1st days after birth but exhibited a rapid increase in mass and head-and-body and tail lengths in the next 2 months. The 2 sexes differed in their growth trajectories concerning head-and-body length and mass. After 60 days males weighed approximately 60 g, and females weighed approximately 45 g (Martins-Hatano et al. 2001). The minimum mass of lactating or pregnant females captured by us was 90 g, and the maximum mass recorded was 136 g. Among the ectoparasites recorded in C. goytaca sp. nov. by Bergallo et al. (2004) were the macronyssid mite Ornithonyssus sp. and laelapid mites Laelaps manguinhosi, Gigantolaelaps goyanensis, and G. vitzthumi. Adult males and young individuals of this last species were abundant at the nests. One unidentified botfly (Diptera: Cuterebridae) was recorded in 1 individual.

DISCUSSION Sigmodontine taxonomy has been very dynamic over the last decade due to more objective phylogenetic treatment of proposed suprageneric groups, improved sampling of poorly known taxa and areas, and the integrated analyses of morphological and genetic data to address species-level questions. The genus Cerradomys is one of the best examples in this context of rapid changes, because in ,10 years 5 new species have been described based on samples originally treated as O. subflavus (Bonvicino 2003; Langguth and Bonvicino 2002; Percequillo et al. 2008). Cytogenetic analyses initially uncovered much of this species diversity by revealing a remarkable variation in chromosomal number (diploid number) and chromosomal morphology (autosomal fundamental number) within the genus (Almeida and Yonenaga-Yassuda 1985; Andrades-Miranda et al. 2002; Bonvicino et al. 1999; Maia and Hulak 1981). Since then further evaluation of these karyological variants has led to the recognition of a wider diversity of species diagnosed by unique combinations of morphological, morphometric, and karyological characters. The discovery of C. goytaca sp. nov. represents an extension of this approach to samples previously unappreciated in the latest taxonomic assessments of the genus. Populations of C. goytaca sp. nov. had been assigned to Oryzomys (5 Cerradomys) subflavus in several papers addressing the ecology of the small mammals in the northern littoral of Rio de Janeiro State (Bergallo et al. 2004, 2005; Martins-Hatano et al. 2001), but little information was available on cytogenetic and morphological differentiation of these populations in relation to the other species of Cerradomys. The morphological analyses provided here clearly indicate that C. goytaca sp. nov. differs from the remaining 6 species of Cerradomys in trenchant external, cranial, morphometric, and karyological characters, representing one of the largest body sizes and presenting the highest autosomal fundamental number when compared with C. vivoi and C. subflavus and the most southeasterly distributed species of the genus.

655

Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. also is the sole species of the genus restricted to coastal physiognomies. All other species of Cerradomys have their core distributions in the more interior biomes of Cerrado and Caatinga, extending their ranges to coastal areas of Atlantic Forest only when human-driven forest clearing and disturbance has occurred, as is the case for C. vivoi and C. langguthi in northeastern Brazil (Percequillo et al. 2008). Therefore, C. goytaca sp. nov. apparently represents the most geographically restricted and coastal representative of a typically hinterland and open-habitat genus. This feature of C. goytaca sp. nov. offers key biogeographical insights regarding mammalian endemism in the poorly known coastal habitats commonly termed restingas. The restingas are sand dune habitats characteristic of the Atlantic Forest sensu lato (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes 2000) that occur along sandy plains of the Brazilian coast, frequently including freshwater or brackish coastal lagoons. These relatively open habitats comprise herbaceous and shrubby vegetation distributed throughout the barren sandy soils near the seashore, sharply contrasting with the adjacent lowland Atlantic Forests (Arau´jo 1992). Even though most restingas are located in zones of tropical climates, water supply is scarce for most organisms because of the rapid percolation of water through the unconsolidated sandy substrate. As a result, moreluxuriant forest formations are found only near lagoons and humid depressions, being periodically flooded during rainy seasons. Despite these stringent ecological conditions, most biogeographic treatments of the restinga biota have considered it as a subset of the Atlantic Forest biota with low degrees of endemism, especially for terrestrial vertebrates (Cerqueira 2000; Cerqueira et al. 1990; Rocha 2000; Rocha et al. 2005). The recognition of C. goytaca sp. nov., however, indicates that significant geographic differentiation is taking place in the restingas and that the endemic lineages involved are not necessarily related to Atlantic Forest taxa. Contrary to other small mammals found in the restingas, C. goytaca sp. nov. preferentially inhabits the shrubby vegetation islands interspersed among the barren sandy soils, a microhabitat probably unsuitable for forest-dwelling species. A similar biogeographic pattern is observed in the spiny rat Trinomys eliasi, which was considered until recently the sole mammal endemic to the restingas of Rio de Janeiro State (Cerqueira 2000; Pessoâ and Reis 1993; but see Brito and Figueiredo 2003). This coastal spiny rat also is most closely related to species occupying interior seasonal and deciduous forests rather than the coastal lowland physiognomies (Lara and Patton 2000). Furthermore, the discovery of C. goytaca sp. nov. supports the notion that the communities commonly termed as restingas are considerably divergent in species composition and evolution. Bergallo et al. (2004) noted that few mammal species were shared between the restingas of the northeastern and central portions of Rio de Janeiro State (Jurubatiba and Marica´ restingas) and that the 2 communities were remarkably different in diversity and structure. This pattern also was corroborated by Rocha et al. (2008) in a broader comparison of frog species among several restingas of southeastern Brazil.

656


Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. adds further regional singularity to the restingas of northeastern Rio de Janeiro, because it represents the 1st mammal species exclusively found in only 1 section of restingas across the littoral. Such regional singularity also was recognized by Arau´jo et al. (2001) in a recent revision of the distribution of vascular plant species, which highlighted that among the 48 species endemic to the Brazilian restingas, 12 are exclusively found in the northeastern littoral of Rio de Janeiro State. The section of the littoral occupied by C. goytaca sp. nov. has been considered a unique geological unity in the Brazilian coast, differing from other sandy plains in its history and genesis. The extensive sandy plains located between the Macae´ and Itabapoana rivers were formed by the interaction between the Quaternary marine transgressions and the deposition of sediments carried by the Rio Paraı´ba do Sul (Suguio and Tessler 1984; Turcq et al. 1986). The current geography of the area is relatively recent, because the last marine transgression maximum occurred some 5,100 years ago, and the oldest portions of the sand plains date only to the Pleistocene. Despite the geological uniqueness of the northeastern littoral of Rio de Janeiro State, its recency of geological formation has been evoked as the main reason for the low levels of endemism observed in restingas (Cerqueira 2000). Nevertheless, detailed studies of small mammals of other Quaternary sandy plains as recent as those from the northern Rio de Janeiro littoral have revealed considerable species-level diversification. A noteworthy case has been the speciation of tuco-tucos (subterranean rodents of the genus Ctenomys) in sand dunes of southern Brazil. These dunes have been formed during the last 400,000 years of transgression– regression marine cycles (Tomazelli et al. 2000), a time interval broad enough to encompass the origin of at least 4 endemic tuco-tuco species. Ctenomys flamarioni, for instance, is restricted to the most recent line of dunes, which formed only 5,000 years ago (Fernandes et al. 2007). Therefore, given the limited information available on the biota of the northeastern littoral of Rio de Janeiro, the biogeographic singularity of this region might have been overlooked. Until the present, C. goytaca sp. nov. is the sole endemic vertebrate restricted to this section, but higher levels of endemism might be acknowledged with a detailed examination of morphological and genetic variation in poorly studied vertebrates occurring in these habitats.

RESUMO E´ descrita uma nova espećie de Cerradomys das planıćies arenosas do litoral nordeste do estado do Rio de Janeiro e do litoral sul do estado do Espı´rito Santo, no sudeste do Brasil. Caracteres morfolo´gicos e cariolo´gicos foram utilizados para distinguir o novo ta´xon das 3 espećies mais similares: C. subflavus, C. vivoi e C. langguthi. As diferenças cranianas incluem o tamanho geral maior, cristas mais conspıćuas, rostro mais largo, vacuidades esfeno-palatinas e lacrimais mais amplos. A ana´lise de varia´veis canoˆnicas baseada em dados

Vol. 92, No. 3

craniome´tricos mostrou que a nova espećie pouco se sobrepo˜e a C. subflavus, C. vivoi e C. langguthi no espaço multivariado. A pelagem da nova espećie tem um aspecto mais esparso e fino que e´ uńico dentre as espećies congene´ricas. O nu´mero diploíde de 54 cromossomos e o nu´mero fundamental autossoˆmico de 66 braços (o mais alto entre as treˆs espećies relacionadas), em conjunto com a morfologia do par sexual, saõ diagno´sticos para a nova espećie. O novo ta´xon e´ restrito a uma seçaõ particular do litoral brasileiro coberto por um mosaico de vegetaço˜es predominantemente abertas localmente chamado de ‘‘restingas,’’ onde ele e´ o mamı´fero terrestre mais abundante. Nas restingas da regiaõ, esta espećie esta´ mais associada a`s moitas arbustivas do que a`s formaço˜es florestadas, sendo capturado tanto no solo como sobre ramos arbo´reos, especialmente em a´rvores de Clusia. Esta observaçaõ evidencia um grau de arborealidade. O reconhecimento desta espećie acrescenta mais uma singularidade biogeogra´fica a`s restingas do litoral norte do estado do Rio de Janeiro e sul do estado do Espı´rito Santo.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to the curators who granted us permission to examine specimens: J. A. Oliveira and S. M. Franco of the Museu Nacional and L. M. Sarmento-Soares of the Museu de Biologia Professor Mello Leitaõ. This research was funded by Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa de Desenvolvimento Tecnolo´gico (476049/20075). LMP was supported partially by a fellowship from the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa de Desenvolvimento Tecnolo´gico (304758/20078). WCT was supported by a master fellowship from the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa de Desenvolvimento Tecnolo´gico. We also are grateful to the administration of the Parque Nacional Restinga de Jurubatiba for granting permission and providing support to study the small mammals in the reserve area. Collecting licenses were provided by the Instituto Brasileiro de Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renova´veis (license 12685-1) and Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservaçaõ da Biodiversidade (license 17496-1).

LITERATURE CITED ALMEIDA, E. J. C., AND Y. YONENAGA-YASSUDA. 1985. Robertsonian fusion, pericentric inversion and sex chromosome heteromorphisms in Oryzomys subflavus (Cricetidae, Rodentia). Caryologia 38:129–137. ANDRADES-MIRANDA, J., N. I. T. ZANCHIN, L. F. B. OLIVEIRA, A. R. LANGGUTH, AND M. S. MATTEVI. 2002. (T2AG3)n telomeric sequence hybridization indicating centric fusion rearrangements in the karyotype of the rodent Oryzomys subflavus. Genetica 114:11–16. ARAU´JO, D. S. D. 1992. Vegetation types of sandy coastal plains of tropical Brazil: a first aproximation. Pp. 337–367 in Coastal plant communities of Latin America (U. Seeliger, coord.). Academic Press, New York. ARAU´JO, D. S. D., ET AL. 1998. As comunidades vegetais do Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba, Macae´, RJ. Pp. 39–62 in Ecologia das lagoas costeiras do Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba e do Municı´pio de Macae´ (RJ) (F. A. Esteves, ed.). Nućleo de Pesquisas Ecolo´gicas de Macae´/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janiero, Macae´, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ARAU´JO, D. S. D., A. F. DA COSTA, A. S. OLIVEIRA, AND R. L. MOURA. 2001. Florı´stica e padro˜es fitogeogra´ficos. Pp. 155–165 in Flora do Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba e arredores, Rio de

June 2011


Janeiro, Brasil: listagem, florı´stica e fitogeografia: angiospermas, pterido´fitas, algas continentais (A. F. Costa and I. C. A. Dias., eds.). Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Se´rie Livros 8. BERGALLO, H. G., ET AL. 2004. Os mamı´feros da Restinga de Jurubatiba. Pp. 215–230 in Pesquisas Ecolo´gicas de Longa Duraçaõ na Restinga de Jurubatiba: ecologia, histo´ria natural e conservaçaõ (C. F. D. Rocha, F. A. Esteves, and F. B. Scarano, eds.). RiMa, Saõ Carlos, Saõ Paulo, Brazil. BERGALLO, H. G., J. L. LUZ, D. S. RAIĆES, F. H. HATANO, AND F. MARTINS-HATANO. 2005. Habitat use by Oryzomys subflavus (Rodentia) in an open shrubland formation in Restinga de Jurubatiba National Park, RJ, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 65:583–588. BONVICINO, C. R. 2003. A new species of Oryzomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) of the subflavus group from the Cerrado of central Brazil. Mammalian Biology 68:78–90. BONVICINO, C. R., AND M. A. MOREIRA. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Oryzomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) based on cytochrome b DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18:282–292. BONVICINO, C. R., I. B. OTAZU, AND P. M. BORODIN. 1999. Chromosome variation in Oryzomys subflavus species group (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia) and its taxonomic implication. Cytologia 64:327–332. BRITO, D., AND M. S. L. FIGUEIREDO. 2003. Minimum viable population and conservation status of the Atlantic Forest spiny rat Trinomys eliasi. Biological Conservation 112:153–158. CARLETON, M. D., AND G. G. MUSSER. 1989. Systematic studies of oryzomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae): a synopsis of Microryzomys. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 191:1–83. CERQUEIRA, R. 2000. Biogeografia das restingas. Pp. 65–75 in Ecologia de restingas e lagoas costeiras (F. A. Esteves and L. D. Lacerda, eds.). Nućleo de Pesquisas Ecolo´gicas de Macae´/ Universidade do Rio de Janiero, Macae´, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. CERQUEIRA, R., F. A. S. FERNANDEZ, AND M. F. Q. S. NUNES. 1990. Mamı´feros da restinga de Barra de Marica´. Papeís Avulsos de Zoologia 37:141–157. D’ELIA, G., I. MORA, P. MYERS, AND R. D. OWEN. 2008. New and noteworthy records of Rodentia (Erethizontidae, Sciuridae, and Cricetidae) from Paraguay. Zootaxa 1784:39–57. D’ELIÁ, G., U. F. J. PARDINÃS, P. TETA, AND J. L. PATTON. 2007. Definition and diagnosis of a new tribe of sigmodontine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae), and a revised classification of the subfamily. Gayana 71:187–194. ESBE´RARD, C. E. L., AND H. G. BERGALLO. 2005. Research on bats in the state of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil. Mastozoologıá Neotropical 12:237–243. FERNANDES, F. A., G. P. FERNAŃDEZ-STOLZ, C. M. LOPES, AND T. R. O. FREITAS. 2007. The conservation status of tuco-tucos, genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae), in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 67:839–847. FORD, C. E., AND J. L. HAMERTON. 1956. A colchicine hypotonic citrate squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technology 31:247–251. GANNON, W. L., R. S. SIKES, AND THE ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MAMMALOGISTS. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88:809–823. GRENHA, V., M. V. MACEDO, A. S. PIRES, AND R. F. MONTEIRO. 2010. The role of Cerradomys subflavus (Rodentia, Cricetidae) as seed predator and disperser of the palm Allagoptera arenaria. Mastozoologıá Neotropical 17:61–68.

657

LAMEGO, A. R. 1974a. O Homem e o Brejo. 2nd ed. Editora Lidador, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. LAMEGO, A. R. 1974b. O Homem e a Restinga. 2nd ed. Editora Lidador, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. LANGGUTH, A., AND C. R. BONVICINO. 2002. The Oryzymys subflavus group, with description of two new species (Rodentia, Muridae, Sigmodontinae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional (Rio de Janeiro) 60:285–294. LARA, M. C., AND J. L. PATTON. 2000. Evolutionary diversification of spiny rats (genus Trinomys, Rodentia: Echimyidae) in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 130:661–686. LE´RY, J. DE. 1961. Viagem a` terra do Brasil. Biblioteca do Exe´rcito, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. LEVAN, A., K. FREDGA, AND A. A. SANDBERG. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas, 52:201– 220. MAIA, V., AND A. HULAK. 1981. Robertsonian polymorphism in chromosomes of Oryzomys subflavus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 31:33–39. MANLY, B. F. J. 1994. Multivariate statistical methods: a primer. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. MARTINS-HATANO, F., T. T. L. RIBEIRO, N. JUCA´, D. P. DA COSTA, M. BAPTISTA, AND H. G. BERGALLO. 2001. Desenvolvimento po´s-natal de Nectomys squamipes (Brants, 1827) e Oryzomys gr. subflavus (Wagner, 1842) (Rodentia, Muridae) sob condiçaõ de laborato´rio. Revista Brasileira de Zoocieˆncias 3:243–252. MUSSER, G. G., AND M. D. CARLETON. 2005. Superfamily Muroidea. Pp. 894–1531 in Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference (D. E. Wilson and D. M Reeder, eds.). 3rd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. MUSSER, G. G., M. D. CARLETON, E. M. BROTHERS, AND A. L. GARDNER. 1998. Systematic studies of orizomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae): diagnoses and distributions of species formerly assigned to Oryzomys ‘‘capito.’’ Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 236:1–376. OLIVEIRA-FILHO, A. T., AND M. A. L. FONTES. 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793–810. PARDINÃS, U. F. J. 2008. A new genus of oryzomyine rodent (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) from the Pleistocene of Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 89:1270–1278. PARDINÃS, U. F. J., G. D’ELIÁ, AND P. TETA. 2008. Una introduccioń a los mayores sigmodontinos viventes: revisioń de Kunsia Hershkovitz, 1966 y descripcio´ n de un nuevo ge´ nero (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 66:509–594. PERCEQUILLO, A. R., E. HINGST-ZAHER, AND C. R. BONVICINO. 2008. Systematic review of genus Cerradomys Weksler, Percequillo and Voss, 2006 (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Oryzyomyini), with description of two new species from eastern Brazil. American Museum Novitates 3622:1–46. PESSOÂ, L. M., AND S. F. REIS. 1993. A new subspecies of Proechimys iheringi Thomas (Rodentia: Echimyidae) from state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mammalian Biology 58:181–190. PESSOÂ, L. M., W. C. TAVARES, AND P. R. GONÇALVES. 2010. Mamı´feros do macrocompartimento litoraˆneo da Bacia de Campos. Pp. 95–125 in Mamı´feros das restingas e manguezais do Brasil (L. M. Pessoâ, W. C. Tavares, and S. Siciliano, eds.). Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ROCHA, C. F. D. 2000. Biogeografia de re´pteis de restingas: distribuiçaõ, ocorreˆncia e endemismos. Pp. 99–116 in Ecologia

658


de restingas e lagoas costeiras (F. A. Esteves and L. D. Lacerda, eds.). Nućleo de Pesquisas Ecolo´gicas de Macae´/Universidade do Rio de Janiero, Macae´, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ROCHA, C. F. D., F. H. HATANO, D. VRCIBRADIC, AND M. VAN SLUYS. 2008. Frog species richness, composition and beta-diversity in coastal Brazilian restinga habitats. Brazilian Journal of Biology 68:101–107. ROCHA, C. F. D., M. VAN SLUYS, H. G. BERGALLO, AND M. A. S. ALVES. 2005. Endemic and threatened tetrapods in the restingas of the biodiversity corridors of Serra do Mar and of the central da Mata Atlaˆntica in eastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 65:159–168. SCARANO, F. R., ET AL. 2004. Ecologia vegetal: integrando ecossistema, comunidades, populaço˜es e organismos. Pp. 77–97 in Pesquisas Ecolo´gicas de Longa Duraçaõ na Restinga de Jurubatiba: ecologia, histo´ria natural e conservaçaõ (C. F. D. Rocha, F. A. Esteves, and F. R. Scarano, eds.). RiMa, Saõ Carlos, Saõ Paulo, Brazil. SOFFIATI, A. 2000. Aspectos histo´ricos das restingas da eco-regiaõ norte do estado do Rio de Janeiro—Brasil. Pp. 341–370 in Ecologia de restingas e lagoas costeiras (F. A. Esteves and L. D. Lacerda, eds.), Nućleo de Pesquisas Ecolo´gicas de Macae´/ Universidade do Rio de Janiero, Macae´, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. STADEN, H. 1974. Duas viagens ao Brasil. Editora da Universidade de Saõ Paulo, Saõ Paulo, Brazil. STATSOFT, INC. 2007. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 8.0. http://www.statsoft.com. Accessed 11 January 2010. STEVENS, J. 1992. Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey. SUGUIO, K., AND M. G. TESSLER. 1984. Planıćies de cordo˜es litoraˆneos quaterna´rios do Brasil: origem e nomenclatura. Pp. 15–25 in Restingas: origem, estrutura, processos (L. D. Lacerda, D. S. D. Araujo, R. Cerqueira, and B. Turcq, eds.). CEUFF, Niteroí, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. TAVARES, W. C., L. M. PESSOÂ, M. da C. GOMES, AND E. S. RODRIGUES. 2008. Primeiro registro de Gracilinanus microtarsus (Wagner, 1842) em restinga com a inclusaõ do espećime testemunho (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae). In IV Congresso Brasileiro de Mastozoologia CD-ROM (Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, ed.). Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, Saõ Lourenço, Minas Gerais, Brazil. TOMAZELLI, L. J., S. R. DILLENBURG, AND J. A. VILLWOCK. 2000. Late Quaternary geological history of Rio Grande do Sul coastal plain, southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Geocieˆncias 30:474–476. TURCQ, B., R. COE-NETO, AND J. M. FROIDEFOND. 1986. Variability of beach ridges on the coast of Marica´ (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil). Pp. 45–57 in Quaternary of South America and Antarctic Peninsula (J. Rabasa, ed.). A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Vol. 4. VOSS, R. S. 1988. Systematics and ecology of ichthyomyine rodents (Muroidea): patterns of morphological evolution in a small adaptive radiation. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 188:260–493. VOSS, R. S., M. GOMEZ-LAVERDE, AND V. PACHECO. 2002. A new genus for Aepeomys fuscatus Allen, 1912 and Oryzomys intectus Thomas, 1921: enigmatic murid rodents from Andean cloud forests. American Museum Novitates 3373:1–42. WAGNER, A. 1842. Diagnosen neuer Arten brasilisher Saügethiere. Archiv fu¨r Naturgeschichte Jahrgang 8:356–362. WEKSLER, M. 2003. Phylogeny of Neotropical oryzomyine rodents (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) based on the nuclear IRBP exon. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29:331–349.

Vol. 92, No. 3

WEKSLER, M. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of oryzomyine rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 296:1–149. WEKSLER, M., A. R. PERCEQUILLO, AND R. S. VOSS. 2006. Ten new genera of oryzomyine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). American Museum Novitates 3537:1–29.

Submitted 23 March 2010. Accepted 26 December 2010. Associate Editor was David L. Reed.

APPENDIX I Collecting localities and examined specimens. Localities records for Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov. are plotted in the map of Fig. 1. Sex of each specimen is designated as M for males and F for females. Cerradomys goytaca sp. nov.—ESPI´RITO SANTO: 1. Praia das Neves, Presidente Kennedy; 21u149S, 40u579W: MN 67543 (M). RIO DE JANEIRO: 2. Restinga de Iquipari-Grussai, Grussai, Saõ Joaõ da Barra; 21u449410S, 41u029250W: MN 73261 (M). 3. Restinga do Farolzinho, Farol de Saõ Tome´, Campos dos Goytacazes; 22u009S, 40u599W: MN 73276 (M). 4. Sı´tio Santana, Beira de Lagoa, Quissama˜; 22u049140S, 41u249130W: MN 73198 (F), 73200 (F), 73201 (F), 73202 (M), 73205 (M), 73208 (M), 73209 (F), 73210 (M), 73211 (F), 73216 (F), 73218 (M), 73219 (F), and 73220 (F). 5. Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba, Carapebus, (type locality); 22u159S, 41u399W: MN 67528 (F), 67533 (F), 73172 (paratype, M), 73174 (paratype, F), 73177 (holotype, M), 73178 (unknown sex), 73180 (unknown sex), 73181 (F), 73183 (paratype, M), 73184 (M), 73187 (M), 73191 (paratype, M), and 73193 (F). Cerradomys langguthi.—PERNAMBUCO: Caruaru; 8u129S, 35u549W: MN 12005 (M), 12007 (M), 12008 (unknown sex), and 12009 (M). Garanhuns [including Sı´tio Macuca, Sı´tio Cavaquinho, Sı´tio Va´rzea do Inga´, Fazenda Santa da Pedra, and Sı´tio Capim]; 8u509S, 36u309W: MN 12035 (F), 12037 (F), 12045 (M), 12046 (F), 12047 (M), and 12048 (M). Triunfo [including Sı´tio Serrinha, Sı´tio Santo Antoˆnio de Laje, Sı´tio Saõ Joaõ, Sı´tio Peri-Peri, and Sı´tio Lagoa do Almeida]; 7u509S, 38u059W: MN 15282 (F), 15288 (M), 15290 (F), 15294 (M), 15295 (M), and 15296 (M). Cerradomys subflavus.—MINAS GERAIS: Arcos; 20u199S, 45u299W: MBML 289 (unknown sex). Belo Horizonte [including Caixa D’a´gua, Sessaõ Fazenda Agrıćola, and Pampulha]; 19u529S, 43u579W: MN 13554 (unknown sex), 14563 (unknown sex), and 32447 (F). Jaı´ba, Vila Mocambinho; 15u219S, 43u399W: MN 29053 (M) and 29057 (F). Jaboticatubas; 19u309S, 43u449W: MN 13559 (F). Lagoa Santa (type locality of C. subflavus): 19u419S, 43u479W: MN 4092 (F), 4217 (F), 4226 (F), and 31386 (F). Ouro Preto, 20u229S, 43u429W; MN 13561 (M). Parque Nacional Serra do Cipo´; 18u559S, 43u399W: MN 31394 (M). Passos; 20u429S, 46u349W: MN 32748 (F). Salinas; 16u089S, 42u189W: MN 42841 (unknown sex) and 42844 (M). Cerradomys vivoi.—BAHIA: Feira de Santana [including Fazenda Treˆs Riachos, Fazenda Tanquinhos, and Fazenda Cazumba´]; 12u169S, 38u579W: MN 9816 (F), 14924 (F), 14925 (M), 14946 (M), 14957 (M), 14973 (unknown sex), 14978 (M), 14986 (M), 17926 (M), and 17934 (M). Jequie´ [including Fazenda Pedra Redonda]; 13u519S, 40u049W: MN 14721 (F), 14725 (F), and 44337 (unknown sex). Serrinha [including Fazenda Tiririca, Sı´tio Totonio, and Fazenda Cajazeira]; 11u379S, 38u589W: MN 18088 (unknown sex), 18090 (M), 18091 (F), 18106 (M), and 18109 (M). Trancoso, Porto Seguro; 16u349S, 19u069W: MN 67544 (M). SERGIPE: Brejo Grande [including Fazenda Capivara]; 10u289S, 36u259W: MN 30589 (M) and 30596 (unknown sex).