On Best Extensions of Hardy-Hilbert's Inequality with Two ... - EMIS

4 downloads 0 Views 331KB Size Report
Abstract. This paper deals with some extensions of Hardy-Hilbert's inequality with the best constant factors by introducing two parameters λ and α and using the.
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics ON BEST EXTENSIONS OF HARDY-HILBERT’S INEQUALITY WITH TWO PARAMETERS volume 6, issue 3, article 81, 2005.

BICHENG YANG Department of Mathematics Guangdong Institute of Education Guangzhou, Guangdong 510303 People’s Republic of China

Received 23 February, 2005; accepted 17 June, 2005. Communicated by: W.S. Cheung

EMail: [email protected]

Abstract Contents

JJ J

II I

Home Page Go Back Close c

2000 Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 055-05

Quit

Abstract This paper deals with some extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality with the best constant factors by introducing two parameters λ and α and using the Beta function. The equivalent form and some reversions are considered. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26D15. Key words: Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality; Beta function; Hölder’s inequality.

Contents 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 Some Lemmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3 Main Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4 Some Best Extensions of (1.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 References

On Best Extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s Inequality with Two Parameters Bicheng Yang

Title Page Contents

JJ J

II I

Go Back Close Quit Page 2 of 35 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(3) Art. 81, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

1.

Introduction

If an, bn ≥ 0 satisfy 0
B , [1 − θp (n)]np(1−φq )−1 apn , α α α n=1 h  ip  φp φq 1 1 where 0 < θp (n) = O nφp < 1, and the constant factor α B α , α is the best possible. Inequality (3.15) is equivalent to (3.8).

Title Page Contents

JJ J

II I

Go Back Close Quit

Proof. Still setting " bn := n

pφp −1

∞ X

am α (m + nα )λ m=1

Page 20 of 35

#p−1 ,

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(3) Art. 81, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

by (3.8), one has (3.16)

0
1, p1 + 1q = 1, λ > 0, α > 2−min{p, q}, 1 (r = p, q), an, bn ≥ 0, satisfy 0
2 2 m +n 2 n=1 m=1

(∞  X n=1

1−

2 πn



apn n

) p1 ( ∞ )1 X bq q n

n=1

JJ J

II I

Go Back Close Quit Page 24 of 35

n J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(3) Art. 81, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

and (3.24)

∞ X n=1

" n

p−1

∞ X

am 2 m + n2 m=1

#p >

∞   π p X

2

n=1

2 1− πn



apn , n

where the constant factors in the above inequalities are the best possible.

On Best Extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s Inequality with Two Parameters Bicheng Yang

Title Page Contents

JJ J

II I

Go Back Close Quit Page 25 of 35 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(3) Art. 81, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

4.

Some Best Extensions of (1.3)

Setting φr =

λα r

(r = p, q), by Theorems 3.1 – 3.4, one has

Corollary 4.1. If p > 1, satisfy 0
0, λα ≤ min{p, q}, an , bn ≥ 0,

0, 0 < + ≤ 1 (r = p, q) = Φ, 2 r it follows  that both (4.7) and (4.8) do not possess reversions. Setting φr = 1 1 − r (λα − 2) + 1 (r = p, q), by Theorems 3.1 – 3.4, one has Corollary 4.3. If p > 1, p1 + 1q = 1, λ, α > 0, 2 − min{p, q} < λα ≤ 2, an , bn ≥ 0, satisfy ∞ ∞ X X 0< n1−λα apn < ∞ and 0 < n1−λα bqn < ∞, n=1

n=1

then one has the following equivalent inequalities:   ∞ X ∞ X 1 p + λα − 2 q + λα − 2 am bn (4.13) < B , α + nα )λ (m α pα qα n=1 m=1 (∞ ) p1 ( ∞ ) 1q X X × n1−λα apn n1−λα bqn n=1

n=1

On Best Extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s Inequality with Two Parameters Bicheng Yang

Title Page Contents

JJ J

II I

Go Back Close Quit Page 30 of 35 J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(3) Art. 81, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

and (4.14)

#p a m n(p−1)(λα−1) α + nα )λ (m n=1 m=1   p X ∞ 1 p + λα − 2 q + λα − 2 < B , n1−λα apn , α pα qα n=1

∞ X

"

∞ X

where the constant factors in the above inequalities are the best possible. If 0 < p < 1, one has (α/2, α) ∈ A and two equivalent reversions as: ) 1q (∞  ) p1 ( ∞  ∞ X ∞ X1 X X am b n 1 1 p bqn (4.15) > kα 1− an α + nα )2/α n (m k n n α n=1 m=1 n=1 n=1 and

Bicheng Yang

Title Page ∞ X

"

∞ X

#p

∞  X



am 1 1 p p > k 1 − an , α α + nα )2/α (m k n n α n=1 m=1 n=1  where kα = α1 B α1 , α1 , and the constant factors are the best possible. (4.16)

On Best Extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s Inequality with Two Parameters

np−1

Proof. For 0 < p < 1,   1 (λα − 2) + 1 ≤ 1 φr = 1 − r

JJ J

II I

Go Back

(r = p, q),

we obtain λα = 2 and φr = 1. By (3.13), we find 0 < θp (n)