Optical absorption enhancement in 3D nanofibers ... - OSA Publishing

Optical absorption enhancement in 3D nanofibers coated on polymer substrate for photovoltaic devices Amirkianoosh Kiani,1,* Krishnan Venkatakrishnan,2 and Bo Tan3 1 2

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada 3 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada * [email protected]

Abstract: Recent research in the field of photovoltaics has shown that polymer solar cells have great potential to provide low-cost, lightweight and flexible electronic devices to harvest solar energy. In this paper, we propose a new method for the generation of three-dimensional nanofibers coated on polymer substrate induced by femtosecond laser pulses. In this new method, a thin layer of polymer is irradiated by megahertz femtosecond laser pulses under ambient conditions, and a thin fibrous layer is generated on top of the polymer substrate. This method is single step; no additional materials are added, and the layers of the three-dimensional (3D) polymer nanofibrous structures are grown on top of the substrate after laser irradiation. Light spectroscopy results show significant enhancement of light absorption in the generated 3D nanofibrous layers of polymer. Finally, we suggest how to maximize the light trapping and optical absorption of the generated nanofiber cells by optimizing the laser parameters. ©2015 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (310.0310) Thin films; (310.1210) Antireflection coatings; (310.4165) Multilayer design; (140.3390) Laser materials processing; (040.5350) Photovoltaic; (050.6875) Threedimensional fabrication; (220.4241) Nanostructure fabrication.

References and links 1.

M. A. Green, “Crystalline and thin-film silicon solar cells: state of the art and future potential,” Sol. Energy 74(3), 181–192 (2003). 2. K. R. Catchpole, M. J. McCann, K. J. Weber, and A. W. Blakers, “A review of thin-film crystalline silicon for solar cell applications. Part 2: Foreign substrates,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 68(2), 173–215 (2001). 3. A. V. Shah, H. Schade, M. Vanecek, J. Meier, E. Vallat-Sauvain, N. Wyrsch, U. Kroll, C. Droz, and J. Bailat, “Thin-film silicon solar cell technology,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 12(23), 113–142 (2004). 4. T. Söderström, F.-J. Haug, V. Terrazzoni-Daudrix, and C. Ballif, “Optimization of amorphous silicon thin film solar cells for flexible photovoltaics,” J. Appl. Phys. 103(11), 114509 (2008). 5. J. Zhu, Z. Yu, G. F. Burkhard, C. M. Hsu, S. T. Connor, Y. Xu, Q. Wang, M. McGehee, S. Fan, and Y. Cui, “Optical absorption enhancement in amorphous silicon nanowire and nanocone arrays,” Nano Lett. 9(1), 279– 282 (2009). 6. A. Kiani, K. Venkatakrishnan, and B. Tan, “Enhancement of the optical absorption of thin-film of amorphorized silicon for photovoltaic energy conversion,” Sol. Energy 85(9), 1817–1823 (2011). 7. A. Kiani, K. Venkatakrishnan, and B. Tan, “Optical absorption enhancement in 3D silicon oxide nano-sandwich type solar cell,” Opt. Express 22(101 Suppl 1), A120–A131 (2014). 8. A. C. Mayer, S. R. Scully, B. E. Hardin, M. W. Rowell, and M. D. McGehee, “Polymer-based solar cells,” Mater. Today 10(11), 28–33 (2007). 9. A. D'Amore, A. K. Haghi, and G. Efremovich Zaikov, Bioscience Methodologies in Physical Chemistry: An Engineering and Molecular Approach, (CRC Press 2013). 10. S. E. Shaheen, R. Radspinner, N. Peyghambarian, and G. E. Jabbour, “Fabrication of bulk heterojunction plastic solar cells by screen printing,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(18), 2996–2998 (2001). 11. S. Günes, H. Neugebauer, and N. S. Sariciftci, “Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells,” Chem. Rev. 107(4), 1324–1338 (2007). 12. T. Aernouts, T. Aleksandrov, C. Girotto, J. Genoe, and J. Poortmans, “Polymer based organic solar cells using ink-jet printed active layers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(3), 033306 (2008).

#235111 - $15.00 USD (C) 2015 OSA

Received 26 Feb 2015; revised 24 Apr 2015; accepted 27 Apr 2015; published 30 Apr 2015 1 Jun 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 11 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.00A569 | OPTICS EXPRESS A569

13. H. J. Jhuo, P. N. Yeh, S. H. Liao, Y. L. Li, Y. S. Cheng, and S. A. Chen, “Review on the Recent Progress in Low Band Gap Conjugated Polymers for Bulk Hetero-junction Polymer Solar Cells,” J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 61(1), 115– 126 (2014). 14. Y. Inomata, K. Fukui, and K. Shirasawa, “Surface texturing of large area multicrystalline silicon solar cells using reactive ion etching method,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 48(1), 237–242 (1997). 15. V. E. Ferry, M. A. Verschuuren, H. B. T. Li, R. E. I. Schropp, H. A. Atwater, and A. Polman, “Improved redresponse in thin film a-Si: H solar cells with soft-imprinted plasmonic back reflectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(18), 183503 (2009). 16. A. M. Zaniewski, M. Loster, and A. Zettl, “A one-step process for localized surface texturing and conductivity enhancement in organic solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(10), 103308 (2009). 17. H. Park, S. Kwon, J. S. Lee, H. J. Lim, S. Yoon, and D. Kim, “Improvement on surface texturing of single crystalline silicon for solar cells by saw-damage etching using an acidic solution,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93(10), 1773–1778 (2009). 18. K. R. Kim, T. H. Kim, H. A. Park, S. Y. Kim, S. H. Cho, J. Yi, and B. D. Choi, “UV laser direct texturing for high efficiency multicrystalline silicon solar cell,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 264, 404–409 (2013). 19. L. A. Dobrzañski, A. Drygaa, P. Panek, M. Lipiñski, and P. Ziêba, “Development of the laser method of multicrystalline silicon surface texturization,” Archives of Materials Science 6, 6 (2009). 20. B. K. Nayak, V. V. Iyengar, and M. C. Gupta, “Efficient light trapping in silicon solar cells by ultrafast-laser-induced self-assembled micro/nano structures,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 19(6), 631–639 (2011). 21. B. Tan and K. Venkatakrishnan, “Synthesis of fibrous nanoparticle aggregates by femtosecond laser ablation in air,” Opt. Express 17(2), 1064–1069 (2009). 22. A. Kiani, P. S. Waraich, K. Venkatakrishnan, and B. Tan, “Synthesis of 3D nanostructured metal alloy of immiscible materials induced by megahertz-repetition femtosecond laser pulses,” Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7(1), 518 (2012). 23. M. D. Shirk and P. A. Molian, “A review of ultrashort pulsed laser ablation of materials,” J. Laser Appl. 10(1), 18–28 (1998). 24. A. Kiani, K. Venkatakrishnan, B. Tan, and V. Venkataramanan, “Maskless lithography using silicon oxide etchstop layer induced by megahertz repetition femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Express 19(11), 10834–10842 (2011). 25. E. G. Gamaly, A. V. Rode, and B. Luther-Davies, “Ultrafast ablation with high-pulse-rate lasers. Part I: Theoretical considerations,” J. Appl. Phys. 85(8), 4213–4221 (1999). 26. I. Zergioti and M. Stuke, “Short pulse UV laser ablation of solid and liquid gallium,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 67(4), 391–395 (1998). 27. S. Panchatsharam, B. Tan, and K. Venkatakrishnan, “Femtosecond laser-induced shockwave formation on ablated silicon surface,” J. Appl. Phys. 105(9), 093103 (2009). 28. J. E. Mark, Polymer Data Handbook. Vol. 27 (New York: Oxford university press, 2009). 29. E. G. Gamaly, “The physics of ultra-short laser interaction with solids at non-relativistic intensities,” Phys. Rep. 508(4), 91–243 (2011). 30. A. Tavangar, B. Tan, and K. Venkatakrishnan, “Study of the formation of 3-D titania nanofibrous structure by MHz femtosecond laser in ambient air,” J. Appl. Phys. 113(2), 023102 (2013).

1. Introduction Rising energy prices are making alternative energy sources increasingly attractive. However, a major drawback of semiconductor-based solar cells is their low efficiency, which is unavoidable [1–7]; innovations in polymers and organic materials science have advanced the production of cheaper, more efficient organic solar cells [8, 9]. During the last decade, many approaches have been proposed for polymer-based solar cell fabrication, such as screen printing, doctor blading, inkjet printing, and spray deposition [8, 10–12]. These techniques are low cost, and the fabricated polymer-based solar cells are lightweight and flexible, leading to reduced fabrication and installation costs. Although these techniques have some advantages, they still suffer from certain limitations, such as poor light absorption [8, 13]. Power conversion efficiency is important in order to compete with the more conventional solar cell fabrication based on silicon and semiconductor materials. Surface texturing is one of the well-known solutions for increasing light absorption of solar cells. During the last few decades, a variety of techniques have been introduced by researchers for solar cell surface texturing [14–17]. Among these methods, laser texturing is a non-contact technique, allowing a great deal of flexibility in defining surface texture. It can be utilized on a wide range of semiconductor materials, and can lead to an alternative solution for solar cell surface texturing [7, 18–20]. However, the current laser texturing methods

#235111 - $15.00 USD (C) 2015 OSA


cannot be applied on polymer-based solar cells because of some compatibility issues, such as low melting temperature and the ablation threshold of polymer and organic materials in the interaction with laser pulses. In this article, a new method is proposed for laser surface texturing of polymer substrate in nanoscale: a combination of high frequency and ultra-short laser pulses enables us to control the average surface temperature and energy influence below the ablation threshold, which can lead to fabricating a 3D nanofibrous layer of polymer on top of the substrate. This technique is single step, and the 3D nanofibrous layer is generated on the substrate without any additive materials. The light spectrometry results show a significant enhancement in light absorption. The result is an efficient solar cell that performs well in terms of light absorption. Finally, the effect of laser parameters has been investigated in order to optimize the light absorption. 2. Experimental setup All polymer substrates were prepared with Sylgard-184, an elastomeric PDMS kit manufactured by Dow Corning. The PDMS prepolymer (SYLGARD 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit) was dissolved in the curing agent in a 1:10 weight ratio. The mixture was poured on top of the silicon wafer substrate; this was followed by spinning the wafer at a spindle speed of 400 rpm for 40 s, which yielded an approximate coating thickness of 700 μm. The samples were baked for 40 minutes at 100 C and left at room temperature for 24 hours until they become completely solidified. Nano-texturing process of polymer samples was carried out using a diode-pumped, Yb-doped femtosecond laser system which can radiate laser pulses with the central wavelength of 1064 nm in the range of 214 femtoseconds to 3.5 picoseconds. The pulse frequency could be variable from 200 kHz to 26 MHz with an average laser power of 12 W. In this experiment, the samples were processed with femtosecond laser pulses at 26 MHz frequency with an average laser power of 4, 7 and 10 W. The laser beam diameter was 4.5 mm, which was expanded to 9 mm using two UV fused silica plano-convex (f = −100) and a plano-concave (f = 200) lenses. Before entering into a galvoscanner, the diameter of the laser beam was reduced to 8 mm by using an iris diaphragm. A 2D galvoscanner was used to focus the laser beam onto the substrate with a scanning speed of 50 mm/s, controlled by EZCAD© software. The focused spot diameter of the laser on the substrate was calculated to be around 10.5 µm. The PDMS samples were irradiated with laser pulses at different power; the irradiated samples were then examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy as well as an optical spectrometer to analyze the properties of the 3D polymer nanofibers generated on the substrate. The results are presented and discussed in the following sections. 3. Results and discussion Figure 1 illustrates three different morphologies obtained with an average laser power of 4, 7 and 10 W at a pulse duration of 214 fs, a 26 MHz frequency and a scanning speed of 50 mm/s. Previous results show that for achieving a nanofibrous structure of semiconductor and metallic materials, megahertz frequency laser pulses at femtosecond range are required [21, 22].

Fig. 1. SEM Images of the irradiated areas at a) 4 W, b) 7 w and c) 10 W.

#235111 - $15.00 USD (C) 2015 OSA


As shown in Fig. 1, by increasing the laser power from 4 W to 10 W, the surface morphologies varied significantly; in the case of 4 W power in Fig. 1(a), we observed dense 3D microstructures of irradiated polymers with a diameter of 40 μm; by increasing the power to 7 W, the diameter of the 3D microfibers reduced to 10 μm with a more permeable structure, and finally at 10 W, the microstructures vanished completely, and only a flat surface of polymer covered by 3D nanofibrous structures could be observed in SEM images in Fig. 1(c).

Fig. 2. EDX results of the irradiated areas at a) 4 W, b) 7 W and c) 10 W.

In Fig. 2, EDX results show the presence of silicon, oxygen and carbon with comparable concentrations for three indicated elements in irradiated areas at 4, 7 and 10 W; this result excluded the possibility of a different compound formation at different powers.

Fig. 3. Detailed SEM Images of the irradiated areas at a) 4 W, b) 7 w and c) 10 W.

Figure 3 shows close-up images of the irradiated area at 4, 7 and 10 W; Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) illustrate that in both cases of 4 and 7 W laser power, the 3D microfibrous structures have spongy and porous structures made of nanofibrous materials. By increasing the laser power to 7 W, the 3D microstructures become thinned and more permeable, and finally at 10 W, no microstructure is observed in SEM image in Fig. 3(c), and we have a surface coated by a layer of 3D nanofibers induced by laser pulses. The surface morphology and material properties of the synthesized structures are influenced by laser parameters. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the SEM images of the synthesized nanofibrous structures of polymer induced by 214 fs laser pulses at 26 MHz with different

#235111 - $15.00 USD (C) 2015 OSA


pulse energies. A TEM image of the nanofibers generated by laser pulses with an average power of 10 W, presented in Fig. 4, shows that they are comprised of nanoparticles in which form interconnected chains in nanoscale. The diameter of the generated nanofibers is around 30 nm.

Fig. 4. TEM Image of the generated nanofibers at 214 fs, 26 MHz and 10 W.

In order to verify the elemental composition of the produced nanofibers, an EDX analysis was conducted. In Fig. 5, the EDX results clearly show the presence of silicon, carbon and oxygen in nanostructured materials, which are the main elements in the PDMS chemical structure.

Fig. 5. EDX result of the generated nanofibers with laser power of 10 W.

The method of nanofiber generation by laser ablation is achieved by heating the target material above its boiling temperature induced by laser pulses, followed by rapid cooling once the laser pulses stop. When ablation of the target material is carried out in a background gas environment or in ambient air, the presence of the air/gas causes the redeposition of the ablated material onto the target surface this does not take place for laser ablation in a vacuum [22, 23] To verify the precision of the experimental results observed in the SEM figures, analytical methods were used to investigate the effects of the laser parameters on the nanofiber generation process. In this approach [24–26], it is presumed that the laser energy is absorbed in a layer much thinner than the penetration depth of the heat wave, thus the one-dimensional heat conduction equation can be estimated by: ∂T ∂ 2T =a ∂t ∂x 2

(1)

Here, a = k C p ρ0 , a is thermal diffusion, Cp is specific heat, k is the heat conduction, finally, ρ

is the material density. Also, it is assumed that the laser pulse profile is in a 0 rectangular shape with the step-like rise and fall [26], thus:

#235111 - $15.00 USD (C) 2015 OSA


t p I (τ ) x 2   exp − T ( x, t ) = k a 0 a  dτ π t −τ  2a (t − τ ) 

(2)

where, tp is pulse duration, Ia is the absorbed laser light intensity estimated by [27]:

4 P(1 − R) (3) π d 2t p f where, R is reflection coefficient, P is average power, f is frequency and d is spot diameter. The maximum surface temperature, Tmax, occurs at the end of the laser pulse; thus the surface temperature at the center of spot area on the substrate during the laser pulse (t