Optimization of Software Testing - ResearchGate › publication › fulltext › Optimizati... › publication › fulltext › Optimizati...can handle the following aspects; reduced testing time, debugging, prioritization of ... testing is planned in parallel with t
ScienceDirect
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000
ScienceDirect ScienceDirect
Procedia Computer Science 00 (2018) 000–000 Procedia Computer Science 132 (2018) 1804–1814
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Science (ICCIDS 2018)
Optimization of Software International Conference on Computational Intelligence andTesting Data Science (ICCIDS 2018) Optimization of Software Testing
Mundita AWOTARa , Roopesh Kevin SUNGKURb a,b
Department of Software and Information Systems, Faculty of Information Communication and Digital Technologies, University of Mauritius, aReduit, Mauritius b
Mundita AWOTAR , Roopesh Kevin SUNGKUR
a,b
Department of Software and Information Systems, Faculty of Information Communication and Digital Technologies, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius
Abstract
The goal of any business is to satisfy the needs of its target customers, and IT industry is not an exception from that rule. Thus, the upgraded version of the V-model testing is supposed to deal with the weaknesses of the original Abstract version in question by combining it with the method known as agile testing. At the beginning of the report, hypothesis as the strengths and weaknesses existing V-model via literature review and interviews The goal ofsuch any business is to satisfy the needs ofofitsthe target customers, andtesting IT industry is not an exception from that with specialistsversion in the sphere were analysed. thedeal possible advantages of agile method of rule. respective Thus, the upgraded of the V-model testingSuccessively, is supposed to with the weaknesses of the original testing then considered. Moreover, comes up with the ways in At which two models be version were in question by combining it withthe thereport method known as agile testing. the the beginning of thecould report, naturally to strengths produce aand much more effective one. Once the new model presented, itsand strengths and hypothesiscombined such as the weaknesses of the existing V-model testing viawas literature review interviews weaknesses werespecialists assessed by a case study analysis using the metric and a advantages data analysis a survey with respective in the means sphere of were analysed. Successively, possible of through agile method of were evaluate theMoreover, credibility the of the futurist model. Promptly, theinresearch found the suggested testingconducted were thentoconsidered. report comes up with the ways which the twothat models could be testing provides better results theeffective commonone. version V-model testing. a real scenarios naturallymodel combined to produce a muchthan more Onceofthe new model wasFirstly, presented, itscase strengths and under metricwere evaluation of by thethe models that the proposed modeland is better the V-model, it weaknesses assessed meanshave of aindicated case study analysis using metric a datathan analysis through a since survey can the following aspects; reduced testing debugging, prioritization requirements , easy of werehandle conducted to evaluate the credibility of the time, futurist model. Promptly, the of research found that themapping suggested roles improved visibility projectthan resources. Secondly, a survey data analysis various testingand model provides betterofresults the common version of V-model testing.highlighted Firstly, a real caseadvantages scenarios of the metric future evaluation model. Theoftop of the new model fromproposed the respondent's the newsince modelit under thepriorities models have indicated that the model is perception better than were; the V-model, manages rapidly changingaspects; priorities, it accelerates time to market, it prioritization increases productivity and it improves quality.of can handle the following reduced testing time, debugging, of requirements , easy mapping roles and improved visibility of project resources. Secondly, a survey data analysis highlighted various advantages © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. of the future model. The under top priorities of the new model from the respondent's perception were; the new model This is an open access article the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) Corresponding author:
[email protected] manages rapidly priorities, it accelerates time of to the market, it increases productivity and it improves quality. Peer-review under changing responsibility of the scientific committee International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Science2018 (ICCIDS 2018).Published by Elsevier B.V. 1877-0509© The Authors.
Peer-review of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Correspondingunder author:responsibility
[email protected] Data Science (ICCIDS 2018). 1877-0509© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Computational I
