Optimizing Power System Restoration Resources and Actions

94 downloads 59 Views 414KB Size Report
Optimizing Power System. Restoration Resources and. Actions. Chen-Ching Liu. Electrical and Computer Engineering. Iowa State University. PSERC Research ...
Optimizing Power System Restoration Resources and Actions Chen-Ching Liu Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University

PSERC Research Tele-seminar, November 2006

State of the Art • Primarily manual work by operators • Off line restoration planning • Little progress has been made on system restoration methodology • On line implementation limited • Literature 2

System Restoration Stages

Load restoration is only a means to an end

PREPARATION

Actions are time-critical

SYSTEM RESTORATION

Load restoration is the objective

LOAD RESTORATION

30-60 minutes 3-4 hours 3

System Restoration Tasks • Knowing status of the grid • Maximizing generation capabilities with the available black start resources • Scheduling of tasks and resources during system restoration • Establishing transmission capability and paths while meeting operating constraints • Picking up load while meeting operating constraints and load requirements 4

Example Restoration Strategies • Build-upward • Build-downward • Other variations

5

First Stage • Basic operations common to all strategies • Sub-processes defining early stages of restoration process • Minimal configuration of autonomous stable source with necessary transmission

6

Restoration Building Blocks • May include non-autonomous BTG, connection transmission, necessary compensation & load blocks • Associated with schedule of switching & control actions

7

Second Stage Target System • System state achieved by end of restoration process • May not be pre-disturbance system • Restrict set of post-restoration configurations

8

Restoration Constraints • Physical constraints • Scheduling constraints • Policy constraints

9

Third Stage

Load Restoration – Pick Up Loads

10

Restoration Strategy SYSTEM RESTORATION

LOAD MANAGEMENT

MW MANAGEMENT

BLACK-START UNIT OPERATION

MECHANICAL INSPECTION

FUEL INSPECTION

MVAR MANAGEMENT

NON-BLACK-START UNIT OPERATION

MAN-POWER DISPATCH

PATH MANAGEMENT

SWITCHING SEQUENCE INSPECTION

STATIC MVAR INSPECTION FAULT INSPECTION

STABILITY INSPECTION

CAPACITY INSPECTION

TRANSIENT VOLTAGE INSPECTION

11

Example – Generation Capabilities (4 Different Generating Units)

12

Example – Optimal Starting Sequence MW

13

Cranking Priorities • Units with critical maximum interval • Critical max interval units with most urgent time constraint • Units that can generate highest MWH within a given period

14

PECO-Energy Generating Units Unit

Type

Chester_4 Chester_5 Chester_6 Chester_7-9 Conowingo_1-7 Conowingo_8-11 Cromby_1 Cromby_2 Croydon_1 Delaware_7 Delaware_8 Delaware_9-10 Delaware_11-12 Eddystone_1 Eddystone_2 Eddystone_3 Eddystone_4 Eddystone_10 Eddystone_20 Eddystone_30-40 Falls_1-3 Moser_1 Muddy Run_1-4 Muddy Run_5-8 Richmond_3 Richmond_4 Schuylkill_1 Schuylkill_3 S h lkill 10

CT CT CT CT Hydro Hydro Steam Steam CT Steam Steam CT CT Steam Steam Steam Steam CT CT CT CT CT Hydro Hydro CT CT Steam Steam CT

MW Cap. Ramp. rate Crank to paral. Crit. max. int. Crit. min. int. Startup req. (MW) (MW/hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) (MW) 15 40 0 N/A N/A 0 15 40 0 N/A N/A 0 15 40 0 N/A N/A 0 45 120 0 N/A N/A 0 200 200 0 N/A N/A 0 200 200 0 N/A N/A 0 180 80 1:40 N/A N/A 8 180 80 1:40 N/A N/A 8 300 120 0:30 N/A 5:00 6 130 60 2:40 3:20 N/A 5 130 60 2:40 3:20 N/A 5 30 90 0 N/A N/A 0 30 90 0 N/A N/A 0 150 40 1:40 N/A 3:20 12 150 40 1:40 N/A 3:20 12 150 40 1:40 N/A 3:20 12 150 40 1:40 N/A 3:20 12 15 45 0 N/A N/A 0 15 45 0 N/A N/A 0 30 90 0 N/A N/A 0 45 135 0 N/A N/A 0 30 90 0 N/A N/A 0 400 150 0:30 N/A N/A 6.6 400 150 0:30 N/A N/A 6.6 50 100 0 N/A N/A 0 50 100 0 N/A N/A 0 135 135 2:00 2:30 N/A 2.7 135 135 2:00 2:30 N/A 2.7 15 45 0 N/A N/A 0

Ramping RampingRate Rate

Critical CriticalMin. Min.Interval Interval

Critical CriticalMax. Max.Interval Interval ......

15

MW Capability Curves

16

Restoration Strategy with Tie Lines SYSTEM RESTORATION TIELINE LINE TIE UTILIZATION UTILIZATION LOAD MANAGEMENT

MW MANAGEMENT

BLACK-START UNIT OPERATION

MECHANICAL INSPECTION

FUEL INSPECTION

MVAR MANAGEMENT

PATH MANAGEMENT

SWITCHING SEQUENCE INSPECTION

STATIC NON-BLACK-START MVAR UNIT OPERATION INSPECTION MAN-POWER DISPATCH

FAULT INSPECTION

STABILITY INSPECTION

CAPACITY INSPECTION

TRANSIENT VOLTAGE INSPECTION

17

Crank NBS Units System Restoration Check If a Tie Line Can Crank an NBS Unit Check If There Is a Path Between Them

Tie Line Utilization

Check If Tie Line Can Provide Enough Cranking Power

Negotiate for More Power Import

Load Management

Check If Enough Load Can Be Found

MW Management

Negotiate for Less Power Import

Path Management

18

Respond to Request System Restoration Respond to Tie Line Request Check If System Can Provide Enough Power

Tie Line Utilization

Negotiate for Less Power Export

Check Transmission Capacity

Load Management

Decide Priority of Tie Line

MW Management

Check Load Restoration Condition

MVAR Management

Check NBS Units Restart Condition

Path Management

19

Serve Load System Restoration Check if a Tie Line Can Serve Loads Check if There Are Transmission Paths

Tie Line Utilization

Check if Tie Line Can Provide Enough Power

Negotiate for More power Import

Load Management

Consider Using Tie Line Instead of System Generation

MW Management

Check if Enough Load Can Be Found

MVAR Management

Negotiate for Less Power Import

Path Management

20

Internal Units to be Cranked by TLi TLi

S1

TLe

21

Internal Units to Provide TLe - TLi TLi

S2

TLe

22

Cranking Paths Affected

TLi

TLe

CT

S3

23

Induced MWh Increase G2

G1

G3

24

Tie Line Utilization MWh Increase by S1 Increase from Earlier Startup of S1 Increase Induced by S1 MWh Decrease by S2 (S3) Decrease from Delayed Startup of S2 (S3) Decrease Induced by S2 (S3)

25

Test Subsystem CROMBY

PEACH BOTTOM

8 7 6 5

4 3 2 1

MUDDY RUN

7 6 5 4 3 2 1

8 9 10 11

CONOWINGO

26

System Generation Capability 3500

MW

3000 2500 2000

Without Peach Bottom

1500

With Peach Bottom

1000 500 0 0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Min after blackout

27

System Generation Capability MW

3500

3000

2500

0MW

1500

10MW

MW

2000

50MW & 100MW

1000

From Peach Bottom

500

0 0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Min after blackout

28

Generic Restoration Actions (GRAs) • start_black_start_unit (X) • find_path (X,Y) • energize_line (X) • pick_up_load (X) • synchronize (X,Y) • connect_tie_line (X) • crank_unit (X) • energize_busbar (X) 29

Using GRAs to Construct RBBs S1

BS

NBS B3

B1 B2 C3

C1 L2

L1 C2

30

Using GRAs to Construct RBBs • Find transmission path between BS & NBS • Start black-start unit BS • Build transmission path from busbar B1 to B3 and pick up loads for stabilization • Crank non-black-start unit NBS 31

Using RBBs & GRAs to Build Restoration Strategies BS1 B1

L1

C1a

C1b

L3 NBS

B2 B3 BS2

L2 C2a C2b

C3

32

Using RBBs & GRAs to Build Restoration Strategies • Select Two RBBs – RBB1: Use BS1 to energize B1 – RBB2: Use BS2 to energize B2

• Build RBB1 – Prepare load – Start BS unit – Energize bus 33

Using RBBs & GRAs to Build Restoration Strategies (Cont.) • Build RBB2 • Energize ring • Restart non-black-start unit NBS • Pick up loads along ring

34

Petri Net Algorithm to Optimize Sequence of GRAs TL1

Bus1 Line1-2

Bus2

L1

Line3-1

Bus3

Line2-3 L2

L3

35

Petri Net Model P1

P2

T1

P14

P8

P3

P15

T4

T2

T14

P4

P9

T5

T3

P21

P22

P17

P16 T15

T16

P25

36

Schulykill-Southwark Subsystem

37

Time to Complete GRAs Generic Restoration Action (GRA) Restart BSU Energize Busbar from BSU/busbar/line

Time (mins.) 15 5

Connect Tie Line

25

Crank a NBSU

15

Synchronize between Busbars/Lines

20

Pick up Load

10

38

Sequence of Actions for Schuylkill-Southwark ============================== Time (min.) Actions ----------------------------------------------------Restoration Building Block 1: 0 Connect BSU CT10 15 Energize bs2 from CT10 20 Energize bs3 from bs2 25 Energize bs4 from bs3 30 Crank NBSU ST3 from bs4 45 Synchronize ST3 with bs4 -----------------------------------------------------

39

Sequence of Actions for Schuylkill-Southwark ============================== Time (min.) Actions ----------------------------------------------------Restoration Building Block 2: 0 15 20 25 30 45

Connect BSU CT3-4 Energize bs9 from CT3-4 Energize bs10 from bs9 Energize bs11 from bs10 Crank NBSU ST1 from bs11 Synchronize ST1 with bs11

40

Sequence of Actions for Schuylkill-Southwark ----------------------------------------------65 Energize bs1 from bs2, bs14 from bs2, bs12 from bs3, bs5 from bs4, bs30 from bs9, bs8 from bs9, bs17 from bs11, bs15 from bs11, bs25 from bs10 70 Energize bs22 from bs1, bs19 from bs14, bs13 from bs12, bs7 from bs5, bs31 from bs39, bs21 from bs25, and synchronize bs14 with bs15 75 Energize bs32 from bs31, bs20 from bs21, bs23 from bs22, and connect bs7 with bs13, bs8 with bs7, and bs22 with bs21 80 Energize bs24 from bs23, bs26 from bs20 85 Energize bs27 from bs26 90 Energize bs28 from bs27 -----------------------------------------------------

41

Further Information • M. M. Adibi (Ed), Power System Restoration Methodologies & Implementation Strategies, IEEE Press, 2000. • J. Wu, C. C. Liu, and R. Chu, “A Petri Net Algorithm for Scheduling of Generic Restoration Actions,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Feb. 1997, pp. 69-76. • L. Fink, K. L. Liou, and C. C. Liu, “From Generic Restoration Actions to Specific Restoration Strategies,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, May 1995, pp. 745-752. • K. L. Liou, C. C. Liu, and R. Chu, “Tie Line Utilization during Power System Restoration,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Feb. 1995, pp. 192-199. • C. C. Liu, K. L. Liou, et al., “Generation Capability Dispatch for Bulk Power System Restoration – A Knowledge-Based Approach,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Feb. 1993, pp. 316-325.

42

Suggest Documents