Path Loss & Fading - IEEE Xplore

1 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size Report
UNIVERSITY of SOUTH CAROLINA. Department of Electrical Engineering. Antenna and Frequency Diversity in the Unmanned Aircraft Systems Bands.
UNIVERSITY of SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Electrical Engineering

Antenna and Frequency Diversity in the Unmanned Aircraft Systems Bands for the Over-Sea Setting David W. Matolak, Ruoyu Sun DASC 2014

University of South Carolina

Outline Ȉ Introduction & Motivation Ȉ Channel Measurements Ȉ Over-sea path loss & dispersion Ȉ Correlations & small-scale fading – Stationarity distance – Ricean K-factor

Ȉ Channel modeling Ȉ Conclusion University of South Carolina

2

Introduction & Motivation Ȉ Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) use GROWING! – News items in popular press daily – Recent DoT report estimates # UAS in USA “will increase from few 100 in 2015 to > 230,000 in 2035”

Ȉ FAA charge: ensure UAS safety – ITU granted spectrum in 2 bands: L-band (960-977 MHz), & C-band (5030-5091 MHz) University of South Carolina

3

Introduction & Motivation (2) Ȉ NASA supporting R&D for FAA Ȉ NASA project UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS) – Exploring/validating technologies for reliable CNPC – U. South Carolina working w/NASA on PHY/MAC ȈAir-ground (AG) channel ȈRadio mod/demod ȈNetworking

University of South Carolina

4

Introduction & Motivation (3)) Ȉ There exist NO comprehensive, validated, wideband models for time-varying AG channel

• Existing measurements

- Sparse, & for different frequency bands in widely different environments - Not parameterized as function of - Elevation ‘ - GS antenna height - GS local environment

- Do not include airframe shadowing University of South Carolina

5

Measurements: Channel Sounder Aircraft

GS Transmitter L-band Tx

C-band Tx

to Transmit Antennas Band L C

DS-SS Signal Bandwidth (MHz) 5 50

Receiver 1 L-band Rx

Receiver 2

C-band Rx

L-band Rx

from Receive Antennas Frequency Span (MHz) 960-977 5000-5100

Ȉ PTx~10 W (40 dBm) Ȉ C-band: HPA G~7 dB, LNAs G~30 dB Ȉ Rrep,max~ 3 kHz University of South Carolina

C-band Rx

from Receive Antennas Band L L C C

DS-SS Sequence Length N 511 1023 511 1023

WMAX (Ps) 102.2 204.6 10.2 20.4

6

Measurement Equipment Ȉ Transportable ground site (GS), S-3B aircraft

1.29 m 1.32 m

20 m extendable tower

Four receiver (Rx) antennas: 2 in C-band, 2 in L-band

University of South Carolina

7

Measurement Environment Ȉ Over-sea, GS near Oxnard, CA – – – –

June 2013 GC=6 dB, GL=5 dB hGS = 20 m El/Az beamwidths Ȉ40q/70 q for C Ȉ85q/60 q for L

– Aircraft antennas omni monopoles (“blades”) – Both straight & oval-shaped flight tracks (FTs) University of South Carolina

8

Over Sea Measurement Site Ȉ Oxnard, CA, 11 June 2013 GS Antenna

• Over 26 GB data (>67 million PDPs) gathered University of South Carolina

9

Oxnard,CA***06/11/2013***C-band Rx1***Track1

783 782

Curved Earth Flat Earth ENU

Elevation Angle (degree)

30

781 780 779 778 777 776

Oxnard,CA***06/11/2013***C-band Rx1***Track1

35

25 20 15 10 5

0.5

1

1.5

0

2

Link Distance (m)

Altitude vs. link distance, straight FT1

x 10

0.5

4

1

1.5

2

Link Distance (m)

Elevation angle vs. link distance, straight FT1

400 350

Azimuth Angle (degree)

Relative height between Tx and Rx (m)

Example Flight Parameters

x 10

4

300 250 200 150

Azimuth angle vs. link distance, straight FT1

100 50 0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Tx-Rx Distance (m)

4

4.5

University of South Carolina

5 x 10

4

10

Over-sea Channel Characteristics 140 135 130 125 120

OxnardCA***06-11-2013***Track1***L-band Rx1&2 Measured L-band Rx1 Measured L-band Rx2 Free Space PL 2-Ray Curved Earth 2-Ray Flat Earth

Ȉ 2-ray behavior @ L-band • L2ray=20log[(4Sd/O)] - 20log{|1 + *v,cexp(-j2S'R/O)|} with *v,c=curved-earth vertical pol. reflection coef.

115 110 105

80

100 95

OxnardCA***06-11-2013***Track1***C-band Rx1 Measured Moving Averaged

70

90 10

4

Link Distance (m)

Ȉ Dispersion

60

RMS-DS (ns)

Path Loss Recorded by Sounder (dB)

Ȉ Path Loss

50 40 30 20

– RMS-delay spread

10 0

0.5

1

1.5

Link Distance (m) University of South Carolina

2 x 10

4

11

Correlations & Small-Scale Fading Ȉ Curved-earth two-ray (CE2R) deterministic Ȉ Communications engineers also use statistical models for channel effects Ȉ Channel is time-varying, so need to estimate distance (time) over which statistics remain constant—the stationarity distance (SD) LOS D01



Surface Reflection

D11

W

LOS

d=d1

W

Surface Reflection

D02 D01 D D 12 11



d=d2>d1

WW W

University of South Carolina

Ȉ 2-ray behavior as distance n, straight FT 12

Stationarity Distance Ȉ Compute power delay profile (PDP) correlation coefficient c('t, ti) Ȉ Channel stationary: 't such that c('t, ti) >0.9 ܿ ο‫ݐ‬, ‫ݐ‬௜ =

‫ܲ ׬‬௔௩௚,ே (߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ )ܲ௔௩௚,ே (߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ + ο‫߬݀)ݐ‬ ଶ



݉ܽ‫ܲ ׬ ݔ‬௔௩௚,ே (߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ ) ݀߬ , ‫ܲ ׬‬௔௩௚,ே (߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ + ο‫߬݀ )ݐ‬ ௅೔

Ȉ PDP at time ti



ܲ ߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ = ෍ ߙ௞,௜ ߜ(߬ െ ߬௞,௜ ) ௞ୀଵ ௜ାேିଵ

Ȉ Avg. PDP, ti to ti+NTs ܲ௔௩௚,ே

1 ߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ = ෍ ܲ(߬, ‫ݐ‬௜ ) ܰ ௜

University of South Carolina

13

Stationarity Distance (2) Ȉ Collect SD statistics for all FTs Ȉ Use median SD Ȉ 'x=v't OxnardCA***06-11-2013***FT1

1

0.8

Contour of C-band PDP corr. coef. vs. link distance & ρšǡ segment of FT1

CDF

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

C-band Rx1 C-band Rx2 10

20

30

40

'x (m)

50

60

70

SD CDFs of straight flight track (FT1)

Ȉ Median SD ~ 250 OC, or ~ 15 m

University of South Carolina

14

Correlations Ȉ Inter-antenna correlation ɏ୅భ ,୅మ

E Aଵ െ Ɋ୅భ Aଶ െ Ɋ୅మ = ɐ୅భ ɐ୅మ

Ȉ A’s = amp vectors =(Aଵ,ଵ , Aଵ,ଶ , … , Aଵ,୧ , … , Aଵ,୬ ), μ=mean, V Vtd dev Intra-band Correlations C-band L-band Mean 0.72 0.04 Median 0.88 0.03 Max 0.98 0.84 Min -0.83 -0.63 Standard 0.38 0.21 deviation

Ȉ Inter-band UNcorrelated

University of South Carolina

Small-Scale Fading • After removal of path loss, small-scale envelope fading modeled as Ricean 40

OxnardCA***06-11-2013***FT1***C-band Rx1 22 20

30 25 KML

20

C-band

KMB 15 10

KML Linear Fit [n=0.17 ,V =1.7] KMB Linear Fit [n=0.17 ,V =1.7] 5

10

15

Link Distance (km)

Rician K Factor (dB)

Rician K Factor (dB)

35

OxnardCA***06-11-2013***FT1***L-band Rx1 KML KMB

L-band

KML Linear Fit [n=0.07 ,V =1.0] 18

KMB Linear Fit [n=0.08 ,V =1.0]

16 14 12 10

20

5

10

15

Link Distance (km)

20

Rician K factors vs. link distance University of South Carolina

16

(Wideband) Channel Modeling Ȉ Tapped-delay line model

CE2R

Intermittent multipath components (MPCs)

Ȉ Sparse multipath channel Ȉ Statistics for intermittent MPCs being compiled University of South Carolina

17

Conclusion • Reported channel measurements for AG channel, in over-sea environment – Propagation path loss ~well modeled by curvedearth two-ray model – RMS-DS moderate (10-50 ns, rare ~ 200 ns)

• Stationarity distance ~ 15 m for computing statistics – Ricean K-factors ~25 dB (C-band), ~12 dB (L-band) – Inter-band correlations generally large, intra-band correlations ~0 University of South Carolina

18

Questions?

Thank You

University of South Carolina

19