UNIVERSITY of SOUTH CAROLINA. Department of Electrical Engineering. Antenna and Frequency Diversity in the Unmanned Aircraft Systems Bands.
UNIVERSITY of SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Electrical Engineering
Antenna and Frequency Diversity in the Unmanned Aircraft Systems Bands for the Over-Sea Setting David W. Matolak, Ruoyu Sun DASC 2014
University of South Carolina
Outline Ȉ Introduction & Motivation Ȉ Channel Measurements Ȉ Over-sea path loss & dispersion Ȉ Correlations & small-scale fading – Stationarity distance – Ricean K-factor
Ȉ Channel modeling Ȉ Conclusion University of South Carolina
2
Introduction & Motivation Ȉ Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) use GROWING! – News items in popular press daily – Recent DoT report estimates # UAS in USA “will increase from few 100 in 2015 to > 230,000 in 2035”
Ȉ FAA charge: ensure UAS safety – ITU granted spectrum in 2 bands: L-band (960-977 MHz), & C-band (5030-5091 MHz) University of South Carolina
3
Introduction & Motivation (2) Ȉ NASA supporting R&D for FAA Ȉ NASA project UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS) – Exploring/validating technologies for reliable CNPC – U. South Carolina working w/NASA on PHY/MAC ȈAir-ground (AG) channel ȈRadio mod/demod ȈNetworking
University of South Carolina
4
Introduction & Motivation (3)) Ȉ There exist NO comprehensive, validated, wideband models for time-varying AG channel
• Existing measurements
- Sparse, & for different frequency bands in widely different environments - Not parameterized as function of - Elevation - GS antenna height - GS local environment
- Do not include airframe shadowing University of South Carolina
5
Measurements: Channel Sounder Aircraft
GS Transmitter L-band Tx
C-band Tx
to Transmit Antennas Band L C
DS-SS Signal Bandwidth (MHz) 5 50
Receiver 1 L-band Rx
Receiver 2
C-band Rx
L-band Rx
from Receive Antennas Frequency Span (MHz) 960-977 5000-5100
Ȉ PTx~10 W (40 dBm) Ȉ C-band: HPA G~7 dB, LNAs G~30 dB Ȉ Rrep,max~ 3 kHz University of South Carolina
C-band Rx
from Receive Antennas Band L L C C
DS-SS Sequence Length N 511 1023 511 1023
WMAX (Ps) 102.2 204.6 10.2 20.4
6
Measurement Equipment Ȉ Transportable ground site (GS), S-3B aircraft
1.29 m 1.32 m
20 m extendable tower
Four receiver (Rx) antennas: 2 in C-band, 2 in L-band
University of South Carolina
7
Measurement Environment Ȉ Over-sea, GS near Oxnard, CA – – – –
June 2013 GC=6 dB, GL=5 dB hGS = 20 m El/Az beamwidths Ȉ40q/70 q for C Ȉ85q/60 q for L
– Aircraft antennas omni monopoles (“blades”) – Both straight & oval-shaped flight tracks (FTs) University of South Carolina
8
Over Sea Measurement Site Ȉ Oxnard, CA, 11 June 2013 GS Antenna
• Over 26 GB data (>67 million PDPs) gathered University of South Carolina
9
Oxnard,CA***06/11/2013***C-band Rx1***Track1
783 782
Curved Earth Flat Earth ENU
Elevation Angle (degree)
30
781 780 779 778 777 776
Oxnard,CA***06/11/2013***C-band Rx1***Track1
35
25 20 15 10 5
0.5
1
1.5
0
2
Link Distance (m)
Altitude vs. link distance, straight FT1
x 10
0.5
4
1
1.5
2
Link Distance (m)
Elevation angle vs. link distance, straight FT1
400 350
Azimuth Angle (degree)
Relative height between Tx and Rx (m)
Example Flight Parameters
x 10
4
300 250 200 150
Azimuth angle vs. link distance, straight FT1
100 50 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Tx-Rx Distance (m)
4
4.5
University of South Carolina
5 x 10
4
10
Over-sea Channel Characteristics 140 135 130 125 120
OxnardCA***06-11-2013***Track1***L-band Rx1&2 Measured L-band Rx1 Measured L-band Rx2 Free Space PL 2-Ray Curved Earth 2-Ray Flat Earth
Ȉ 2-ray behavior @ L-band • L2ray=20log[(4Sd/O)] - 20log{|1 + *v,cexp(-j2S'R/O)|} with *v,c=curved-earth vertical pol. reflection coef.
115 110 105
80
100 95
OxnardCA***06-11-2013***Track1***C-band Rx1 Measured Moving Averaged
70
90 10
4
Link Distance (m)
Ȉ Dispersion
60
RMS-DS (ns)
Path Loss Recorded by Sounder (dB)
Ȉ Path Loss
50 40 30 20
– RMS-delay spread
10 0
0.5
1
1.5
Link Distance (m) University of South Carolina
2 x 10
4
11
Correlations & Small-Scale Fading Ȉ Curved-earth two-ray (CE2R) deterministic Ȉ Communications engineers also use statistical models for channel effects Ȉ Channel is time-varying, so need to estimate distance (time) over which statistics remain constant—the stationarity distance (SD) LOS D01
Surface Reflection
D11
W
LOS
d=d1
W
Surface Reflection
D02 D01 D D 12 11
d=d2>d1
WW W
University of South Carolina
Ȉ 2-ray behavior as distance n, straight FT 12
Stationarity Distance Ȉ Compute power delay profile (PDP) correlation coefficient c('t, ti) Ȉ Channel stationary: 't such that c('t, ti) >0.9 ܿ οݐ, ݐ =
ܲ ௩,ே (߬, ݐ )ܲ௩,ே (߬, ݐ + ο߬݀)ݐ ଶ
ଶ
݉ܽܲ ݔ௩,ே (߬, ݐ ) ݀߬ , ܲ ௩,ே (߬, ݐ + ο߬݀ )ݐ
Ȉ PDP at time ti
ଶ
ܲ ߬, ݐ = ߙ, ߜ(߬ െ ߬, ) ୀଵ ାேିଵ
Ȉ Avg. PDP, ti to ti+NTs ܲ௩,ே
1 ߬, ݐ = ܲ(߬, ݐ ) ܰ
University of South Carolina
13
Stationarity Distance (2) Ȉ Collect SD statistics for all FTs Ȉ Use median SD Ȉ 'x=v't OxnardCA***06-11-2013***FT1
1
0.8
Contour of C-band PDP corr. coef. vs. link distance & ρǡ segment of FT1
CDF
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
C-band Rx1 C-band Rx2 10
20
30
40
'x (m)
50
60
70
SD CDFs of straight flight track (FT1)
Ȉ Median SD ~ 250 OC, or ~ 15 m
University of South Carolina
14
Correlations Ȉ Inter-antenna correlation ɏభ ,మ
E Aଵ െ Ɋభ Aଶ െ Ɋమ = ɐభ ɐమ
Ȉ A’s = amp vectors =(Aଵ,ଵ , Aଵ,ଶ , … , Aଵ,୧ , … , Aଵ,୬ ), μ=mean, V Vtd dev Intra-band Correlations C-band L-band Mean 0.72 0.04 Median 0.88 0.03 Max 0.98 0.84 Min -0.83 -0.63 Standard 0.38 0.21 deviation
Ȉ Inter-band UNcorrelated
University of South Carolina
Small-Scale Fading • After removal of path loss, small-scale envelope fading modeled as Ricean 40
OxnardCA***06-11-2013***FT1***C-band Rx1 22 20
30 25 KML
20
C-band
KMB 15 10
KML Linear Fit [n=0.17 ,V =1.7] KMB Linear Fit [n=0.17 ,V =1.7] 5
10
15
Link Distance (km)
Rician K Factor (dB)
Rician K Factor (dB)
35
OxnardCA***06-11-2013***FT1***L-band Rx1 KML KMB
L-band
KML Linear Fit [n=0.07 ,V =1.0] 18
KMB Linear Fit [n=0.08 ,V =1.0]
16 14 12 10
20
5
10
15
Link Distance (km)
20
Rician K factors vs. link distance University of South Carolina
16
(Wideband) Channel Modeling Ȉ Tapped-delay line model
CE2R
Intermittent multipath components (MPCs)
Ȉ Sparse multipath channel Ȉ Statistics for intermittent MPCs being compiled University of South Carolina
17
Conclusion • Reported channel measurements for AG channel, in over-sea environment – Propagation path loss ~well modeled by curvedearth two-ray model – RMS-DS moderate (10-50 ns, rare ~ 200 ns)
• Stationarity distance ~ 15 m for computing statistics – Ricean K-factors ~25 dB (C-band), ~12 dB (L-band) – Inter-band correlations generally large, intra-band correlations ~0 University of South Carolina
18
Questions?
Thank You
University of South Carolina
19