Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global ...

1 downloads 0 Views 265KB Size Report
Sep 2, 2007 - protected by lead-apron. – relatively high exposure to unshielded parts of the body (extremities, eyes). Scatter radiation. – mainly from patient ...
Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global Assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens Radiation Protection Office Academic Hospital – University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

9-2-2007

Herhaling titel van presentatie

1

Contents Approach on personal dosimetry Exposure pathways Critical applications – interventional radiology – nuclear medicine

Conclusions / remarks Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Personal Dose Monitoring Objectives Demonstrate compliance with regulatory limits Identify new exposure pathways/risks Indicate good/bad radiation protection practice Implement ALARA policies

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Dosimetric Data Average: 0.19mSv/y all exposed workers Meaningless ! Average: 1.05mSv/y measurably exposed workers Meaningless ! Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

RADIOLOGY

NUCLEAR MEDICINE

RADIOTHERAPY

IN-VITRO APPLICATIONS/ RESEARCH Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Dosimetric Data Practical Radiation Protection Occupational exposures in the medical field differ substantially! – distribution of yearly doses is important – how many people receive dose lower than X and higher than Y?

Order of magnitude of doses defined by – – – –

nature procedure? workload? level of radiation protection? methodology of the assessment?

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Departments Overlap

NUCLEAR MEDICINE

RADIOLOGY

RADIOTHERAPY

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

IN-VITRO APPLICATIONS/ RESEARCH

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Departments Overlap CONVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY CONVENTIONAL CT

RADIOLOGY

INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY BONEDENSITO DENTAL

PET-CT

MAMMO

NUCLEAR SPECT MEDICINE RA DIO N TH UCL ER I AP DE Y

ING NN ING A L P TION SI PO

OTHER…

LABELLING

PET

IN-VITRO APPLICATIONS/ RESEARCH BIOMEDICAL RADIOIMMUNOASSAY

RESEARCH

RADIOTHERAPY

BRACHYTHERAPY

EXTERNAL BEAM THERAPY

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Interventional Radiology What? treatments or diagnoses, using imaging for guidance and where considerable amount of fluoroscopy is used

Not limited to radiology department Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Exposures during IR Staff is standing next to patient – protected by lead-apron – relatively high exposure to unshielded parts of the body (extremities, eyes)

Scatter radiation – mainly from patient and towards tube – not uniformly distributed – relatively low energies

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Routine Personal Dose Monitoring in IR How to assess E? – Hp(10) over and under apron will respectively overestimate and underestimate – many algorithms proposed in literature for lead apron workers (one or two dosemeters)

Extremities/eyes – technical problems eye-dose monitoring – routine extremity dose monitoring often encounters sterility problems Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Routine Personal Dose Monitoring in IR AZ-VUB 40 workers monitored with 2 to 3 dosemeters during IR-procedures – Hp(10),chest, under apron – Hp(10),chest, over apron (highest values ~140mSv/y) – Hp(0.07),wrist (highest values ~100mSv/y)

Present algorithm for assessment E – E= Hp(10),ch,u +0.05Hp(10),ch,o – combination “double dosimetry – wearing lead collar”: obligatory Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-Centre Study Belgium

(AZ-VUB, SCK?CEN, FANC, CHU-Liège, CH-Jolimont, KU Leuven)

Algorithm for assessment of E – suitable for various exposure geometries and workloads – smallest overestimation, max 10% underestimation – use Hp(10) and two dosemeters

Assessment of extremity/eye doses – various exposure geometries – relation to workload (#procedures, DAP)? Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Algorithms for E (MCNPX-Voxel) E (0.25/0.50mm wrap around apron)

Lead Collar (0.25mm)

Maximum overestimation of E

Geometry/ worker position

2.83 x Hp(10)thorax,u + 0.04 x Hp(10)neck,o

No

43%

2.74 x Hp(10)thorax,u + 0.01 x Hp(10)neck,o

Yes

52%

fixed over-table tube geometry/ mixed worker positions

2.25 x Hp(10)thorax,u + 0.12 x Hp(10)neck,o

No

146%

2.25 x Hp(10)thorax,u + 0.10 x Hp(10)neck,o

Yes

235%

1.64 x Hp(10)thorax,u + 0.08 x Hp(10)neck,o

No

60%

1.64 x Hp(10)thorax,u + 0.06 x Hp(10)neck,o

Yes

105%

GENERAL ALGORITHM Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

under-table tube geometry/ mixed worker positions under-table tube geometry/ close to patient

PHYSICIAN ALGORITHM Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Assessment of E Calculated algorithms – strongly depend on practice – dosemeter positions strongly influence estimation – underestimation when distance worker-patient increases – large overestimation for general algorithm at positions close to patient (physician) – physician-algorithm? for higher exposures better estimation required! (ICRP) Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Assessment of E Importance lead collar – min ~20% – less pronounced for under-table tube geometry

One dosemeter algorithm? – less accurate – under-apron dosemeter gives no information about eye dose (strong correlation found for Hp(0.07),collar – eye dose) Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Implementation of Double Dosimetry in Practice Algorithm – install safe algorithm – E= a X,under apron+ b Y,over apron shouldn’t we take a=“1” and X=Hp(10),chest?

Who? – all lead apron workers? – related to workload (#procedures, DAP)? – make double dosimetry and lead collar a conditio sine qua non Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Extremity and Eye Dose Approach

apron

– 250 angiography / vascular surgery procedures over 17 centres – Recorded data – dose at legs, hands, forehead – DAP-value/procedure – position of staff members (physician, assistant, nurse) – exposed patient region – use of RP-devices ?

nurse

phys Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

assis

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Extremity and Eye Dose Recorded doses show large differences between centres (same type procedures)! Retracting during acquisition of images (RP) is efficient Median Hp(0.07) (µSv/procedure)

200 180 160 140 120 100

Physicians - RP Physicians + RP Assistants - RP Assistants + RP Nursing Staff

80 60 40 20 0 Head

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Hand

Leg Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Extremity and Eye Dose Workload relation – moderate to strong correlation for physicians Hp(0.07),leg – DAP-value (no additional RP) – normalising the doses to procedure DAP-value (physicians) Staff dose(µSv/Gycm2) angiography centres

head patient exposed region

hand leg head

vascular surgery centres Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

patient exposed region

hand leg

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Extremity and Eye Dose

Estimated Annual Hp(0.07)

700

90000 Head dose

600

80000

Hand dose

500

Leg dose

70000

Annual Cumulated DAP

60000

400

50000

300

40000 30000

200

20000 100

10000

0

Annual Cumulated DAP (Gycm2)

Extrapolation to annual dose based on 3rd quartile values DAPnormalised doses

0 Phys 1

Phys 2

Phys 3

Phys 4

angiography -RP Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Phys 5

Phys 6

vascular surgery

Phys 7

Phys 8

angiography +RP Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Multi-centre study Belgium Extremity and Eye Dose Reason for higher dose/DAP in vascular surgery is unclear Varying radiation protection measures – retracting from patient during acquisition only in some centres – under-table lead curtain rarely used

Large observed differences emphasises routine extremity/eye dose monitoring Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Interventional Radiology Challenges / Future Needs Validation of multi-centre study! Practical routine dose monitoring double dosimetry, extremities, eyes

Trends – modern rooms: biplanar systems – interventional CT (CT-fluoroscopy) – increasing number of procedures (biopsies) – AZ-VUB: 700µSv/proc and 200µSv/proc for respectively hand and head!

Radiation protection training Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine CONVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

RADIOLOGY

INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

PET-CT

MAMMO

BONEDENSITO DENTAL

NUCLEAR SPECT MEDICINE RA DIO N TH UCL ER I AP DE Y

ING NN ING A L P TION SI PO

OTHER…

LABELLING

PET

CONVENTIONAL CT

IN-VITRO APPLICATIONS/ RESEARCH BIOMEDICAL RADIOIMMUNOASSAY

RESEARCH

RADIOTHERAPY

BRACHYTHERAPY

EXTERNAL BEAM THERAPY

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Procedures Diagnostic – > 95% – intravenous administration

Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals – 85% 99mTc-labelled – 10% PET (18FDG) – other… Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Internal radiation exposures Contaminations (inhalation, ingestion, skin contamination) – safety procedures – hygienic measures

Traceability? – reporting problems (worker hesitation) – short half-life of applied radionuclides

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine External Radiation Exposures Effective dose – highest Hp(10) values ~ 5mSv/y – effect of PET-introduction hardly observable (10% workload, lower applied activities)

Extremity doses – close contact with sources – relatively high concentrations – more attention needed

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Location Extremity Dosemeters wrist dosemeter ring dosemeter finger stall TLD-tape Convenience? (exposure time, contamination risk) Accuracy? (highest dose location, correction factor needed) Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine AZ-VUB Routine monitoring with ring dosemeters Case study: dose assessment at 36 locations for 5 different manipulations – location highest dose – order magnitude – correction factor after routine monitoring at position “R08” (location ring dosemeter)

L03

L04

L01

L02

L05

L06

L07

L10

R09 L12

L13 L08 L11

R12

R10

R06

R07

R13 R11 R08

L14

L15

R15

R14

L16

L17

R17

R16

L18

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

L09

R03

R04

R05

R01

R02

R18

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Manipulations kit preparation (labelling) 99mTc

syringe dispensing

Radiopharmacy staff

18F

administration to patient Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Nursing staff Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Manipulations kit preparation (labelling)

Radiopharmacy staff

99mTc

syringe dispensing 18F

administration to patient Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Nursing staff

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Manipulations kit preparation (labelling) 99mTc

syringe dispensing

Nursing staff

18F

administration to patient Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Average Hp(0.07) per handled activity (µSv/GBq)

Nuclear Medicine Kit Preparation 99mTc 30

worker 1 worker 2

L03

L04

25 L01

20

L02

L05

L06

L07

L09 L10

R09 L12

L13 L08 L11

R12

R06

R10 R07

R13 R11 R08

L14

L15

R15

R14

L16

L17

R17

R16

R03

ring dosemeter location

R04 R05

R01

R02

15 L18

R18

10

5

0 L01 L02 L03 L04 L05 L06 L07 L08 L09 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 R18 R17 R16 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11R10R09 R08 R07 R06 R05 R04 R03 R02 R01 Location

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Average Hp(0.07) per handled activity (µSv/GBq)

Nuclear Medicine Dispensing 99mTc 140

120

worker 1 worker 2

L03

L04

100

L01

L02

L05

L06

L07

L09 L10

R09 L12

L13 L08 L11

R12

R06

R10 R07

R13 R11 R08

L14

L15

R15

R14

L16

L17

R17

R16

R03

R04 R05

ring dosemeter location R01

R02

80

60 L18

R18

40

20

0 L01 L02 L03 L04 L05 L06 L07 L08 L09 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 R18 R17 R16 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11R10 R09R08 R07 R06 R05 R04 R03 R02 R01 Location

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Average Hp(0.07) per handled activity (µSv/GBq)

Nuclear Medicine Dispensing 18FDG 900

800

worker 1 worker 2

L03

L04

700 L01

L05

L06

L07

L09 L10

R09 L12

L13 L08 L11

R12

R06

R10 R07

R13 R11 R08

R03

R04 R05

R01

600 L02

L14

L15

R15

R14

L16

L17

R17

R16

R02

500

ring dosemeter location

400 L18

R18

300

200

100

0 L01 L02 L03 L04 L05 L06 L07 L08 L09 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 R18 R17R16 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11R10 R09R08 R07R06 R05R04 R03 R02 R01 Location

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Average Hp(0.07) per handled activity (µSv/GBq)

Nuclear Medicine Administration 99mTc 70

60

50

worker 3 worker 4

L03

worker 5

L04

worker 6 worker 7

L01

L02

L05

L06

L07

L09 L10

R09 L12

L13 L08 L11

R12

R06

R10 R07

R13 R11 R08

L14

L15

R15

R14

L16

L17

R17

R16

R03

R04 R05

R01

R02

40

30

L18

ring dosemeter location

R18

20

10

0 L01 L02 L03 L04 L05 L06 L07 L08 L09 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 R18 R17 R16 R15 R14R13 R12 R11R10R09R08 R07 R06 R05 R04R03 R02 R01 Location

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Average Hp(0.07) per handled activity (µSv/GBq)

Nuclear Medicine Administration 18FDG 600

worker 3 worker 4 500

L03

worker 5 worker 6 worker 7

L04

L01

L05

L06

L07

L09 L10

R09 L12

L13 L08 L11

R12

R06

R10 R07

R13 R11 R08

R03

R04 R05

R01

400 L02

300

L14

L15

R15

R14

L16

L17

R17

R16

R02

ring dosemeter location L18

R18

200

100

0 L01 L02 L03 L04 L05 L06 L07 L08 L09 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 R18R17 R16 R15R14 R13R12 R11R10R09 R08 R07R06 R05R04 R03 R02 R01 Location

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Extrapolation of Results Extremity dose / handled activity, manipulation, worker at 36 locations Monthly handled activity / manipulation, worker Monthly extremity dose / worker at 36 locations

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Highest dose: order of magnitude, location Overall ratio “highest dose/R08-dose” (ring dosemeter) Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Monthly Extremity Dose 50 Highest Hp(0.07) (mSv/month)

6

Ratio Highest dose / R08 dose Administration 18FDG Administration Tc-99m Dispensing 18FDG Dispensing syringes Tc-99m Kit preparation Tc-99m

40

5

4

30

3

20

2

10

1

0

0 L01 worker 1

L09 worker 2

L03 worker 3

L01 worker 4

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

L01 worker 5

L01 worker 6

Ratio Highest dose/R08-dose

60

L03 worker 7 Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Routine Extremity Dose monitoring Dosemeter location – highest dose location not necessarily on “dominant” hand – use practical location and implementation correction factor

Order of magnitude of extremity doses – probably underestimation (contaminations) – accuracy 18F – is there a contribution of β+ ? – do we measure this contribution (physical thickness detector, detectorholder)? Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Radiation Protection Measures Syringe shields – – – –

rarely used during dispensing (poor visibility) sometimes less efficient poor protection for 18FDG always removed for activity calibration

Automated dispensing/administration – more and more commercially available – rather expensive

Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Nuclear Medicine Challenges / Future Needs PET-radionuclides – introduction of β/γ-emitters: 124 I,…

60/61/62 Cu, 68Ga, 94Tc,

– relatively high β+ energies (>1MeV) – relatively high γ energies (>1MeV)

– increasing exposure (whole body, extremities)

Therapy with β- radionuclides – monitored extremity doses > 100mSv (Barth et al) – evaluation of β-response for extremity dosemeters needed Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Conclusion Routine personal dose monitoring in hospitals – some technical / accuracy problems – no consensus interpretation of results

Increasing number applications – workload needs to be considered – radiation protection measures

Increasing diversity asks continuously for characterisation studies Personal Dose Monitoring in Hospitals Global assessment, Critical Applications, Future Needs Peter Covens, Academic Hospital University of Brussels (AZ-VUB)

Eurados Annual Meeting Madrid January 23, 2007

Suggest Documents