Available Online
J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
Publications
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH www.banglajol.info/index.php/JSR
Photocatalytic Degradation of Different Dyes Using TiO2 with High Surface Area: A Kinetic Study M. Z. B. Mukhlish*, F. Najnin, M. M. Rahman, M. J. Uddin Department of Chemical Engineering and Polymer Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh Received 18 August 2012, accepted in final revised form 24 January 2013 Abstract Nanocrystalline TiO2 was synthesized by using one step sol-gel method and characterized by SEM, XRD and EDS. UV-Vis spectroscopic technique has been used for studying the photocatalytic degradation kinetics of methylene blue (MB) and congo red (CR). A comparative study with commercial TiO2 (P25) was also done to find out the effectiveness of this synthesized TiO2. The synthesized TiO2 exhibited a high photocatalytic activity for the degradation of MB and CR but the commercial TiO2 was more efficient. Keywords: Nanocrystalline TiO2; Methylene Blue; Congo Red; Photocatalytic degradation kinetics. © 2013 JSR Publications. ISSN: 2070-0237 (Print); 2070-0245 (Online). All rights reserved. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v5i1.11641 J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
1. Introduction A variety of physical, chemical, and biological methods, such as coagulation, adsorption, membrane process, and oxidation-ozonation are presently available for treatment of dye wastewater [1-3]. The conventional processes are insufficient to purify the wastewaters. They transfered the compounds from aqueous to another phase, thus causing secondary pollution problem. Photocatalytic oxidation is cost effective and capable of degrading any complex organic chemicals when compared to other purification techniques. TiO2 is an important photocatalyst due to its strong oxidizing power, non-toxicity and long term photostability [4]. The TiO2 catalyst can transform organic pollutants into biodegradable compounds of low molecular weight. A considerable technical and academic interest in the photocatalytic properties of nanosize TiO2 powder has led to many detailed studies of the photodegradation of dyes and the related mechanisms and kinetics study [5-10]. TiO2 particles smaller than tens of nanometers shows special optical properties, high catalytic *
Corresponding author:
[email protected]
302
Photocatalytic Degradation
activity and unusual mechanical properties compared with bulk material counterpart [11]. Many methods have been developed to control the size of nanoparticles such as Langmuir-Blodgett films [12], vesicles [13], and reverse micro emulsions method [14]. The chemical and physical properties exhibited by these materials depend, among others, on the composition and the degree of homogeneity. Therefore, different synthesis strategies have been developed such as co-precipitation, flame hydrolysis, impregnation, chemical vapor deposition etc. [15, 16]. The sol-gel method has demonstrated a high potential for controlling the bulk and surface properties of the oxides [17, 18]. Nonhydrolytic sol-gel routes have been also reported in the literature [18, 19]. In this work, we focus on the preparation of TiO2 by sol-gel process. The aims of our study are: (a) to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles from titanium iso-butoxide (TiB) by one step sol-gel method, (b) to characterize the morphology and structure of the prepared TiO2 with several physical methods (SEM, XRD, EDS) and (c) to investigate the photocatalytic degradation kinetics using MB and CR. The photo catalytic performance of P25 is also studied and compared with that of synthesized TiO2. The experimental kinetic data are fitted to various kinetic models and model parameters are evaluated. 2. Experimental 2.1. Materials Titanium isobutoxide (Alfa Aesar, USA), 2-propanol (Alfa Aesar, USA), methylene blue (MERCK, Germany), and congo red (MERCK, Germany) were used as received. Water used in our experiments was triple distilled before use. 2.2. Synthesis The synthesis reactor consists of a three necked round flask equipped with a vertical condenser fitted to the middle neck. A separatory funnel was connected to one of the two side necks. 24.13 mL of deionized water was added to 102.34 mL of 2-propanol under vigorous stirring to the remaining neck of the reactor. Following the addition of water this neck was closed using a rubber stopper. 50 mL of titanium isobutoxide (TiB) was added drop wise to the solution over a 4 h period using the separatory funnel fitted to the flask. This mixture was stirred continuously over a period of 24 h at room temperature under inert condition. At this stage, a stable colloidal suspension of approximately 175 mL was formed. The excess water and alcohol were removed at room temperature and 10 kpa pressure using a rotavapor (Buchi R2015) over a seven days period. Approximately 20 g of TiO2 was obtained using this procedure.
M. Z. B. Mukhlish et al. J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
303
2.3. Photocatalytic experiment 0.5 g of TiO2 was taken into different ceramic crucibles and calcined in a muffle furnace (JSMF-30T, Korea) for 3 h at 450°, 550° and 650°C respectively. Then the TiO2 samples were cooled to room temperature and placed into 50 mL beaker. Thereafter 5 ppm of MB or CR solutions were prepared in 100 mL volumetric flask. UV-Vis spectra were recorded using UV-spectrophotometer (UV-1650, SHIMADZU, Japan) in the wavelength range of 200-800 nm. After that, 50 mL of dye (MB or CR) solution was poured into each beaker that contains TiO2 powders. The solution was placed under solar-like light. Samples were withdrawn at appropriate time intervals and concentration of dye in the solution was determined by UV-spectrophotometer. The same experimental procedure was followed for P25 to compare with the synthesized one. 2.4. The degradation kinetic models Four kinetics models were used to analyse the kinetic data of MB and CR photocatalytic degradation on TiO2 [20-23] : i. The zero-order model describes the degradation process and can be generally expressed as, (1)
c − c 0 = − kt
ii. The first-order model describes the systems where degradation rate depends on the amount of dye molecules in the solution and represented as, (2)
log( c / c0 ) = − kt
iii. The parabolic diffusion model elucidates the diffusion controlled photodegradation and the equation can be written as follows,
1− (c / c 0 ) = − kt t
−1 / 2
+a
(3)
iv. The modified Freundlich model represented by Eq. (4) explains experimental data in terms of ion exchange and diffusion-controlled process. A good fit into the Freundlich model indicates a heterogeneous surface binding.
log(1 −
c ) = log k + b log t c0
(4)
In these equations, C0 and C are the concentration of dye molecule in the solution at time 0 and t, respectively, k the corresponding rate constant, and a and b constants whose chemical significance is not clearly resolved [20].
304
Photocatalytic Degradation
2.5. Characterization techniques Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using HITACHI-4800. JEOL 2010, operated at 200 kV and equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) microanalysis system (OXFORD). The images are obtained using a CCD Mega Vision (III) camera. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a Brucker D-5000 diffractometer equipped with Cu-kα radiation of wavelength of 1.5418 Aº. The accelerating voltage and the applied current were 45 kV and 40 mA, respectively. 3. Results and Discussions 3.1. Morphology and structure analysis SEM image of the TiO2 particles synthesized by sol gel chemistry at low temperature is shown in Fig. 1. It shows the uniformity of the aggregates that are in the nanoscale range. The TiO2 aggregates consist of individual nanoparticles, which are approximately in the 50-60 nm range. The nanostructured surface of the individual particles suggests that pollutant molecules impinging or adhering to the surface should interact preferentially with the photoactive TiO2 phase.
Fig. 1. SEM image of nanostructured TiO2 aggregates.
EDS is an analytical technique used for the elemental analysis of a sample. The EDS spectra of the prepared TiO2 sample are shown in Fig. 2, which clearly confirm the
M. Z. B. Mukhlish et al. J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
305
presence of titanium and oxygen. The other peaks corresponding to ‘*’ and ‘C’ are due to supporting materials used in EDS analysis. This implies that TiO2 sample prepared at low temperature under vacuum condition is free from contamination. 1500 Ti
1000 C Intensity (a.u)
O
500 Ti * *
0 0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5 10.0 Energy (ev)
12.5
15.0
Fig. 2. EDS spectrum of synthesized TiO2 sample. Ti and O indicate the presence of titanium and oxygen. (C and * represent carbon and copper that come from analysis grid).
Fig. 3. XRD patterns of TiO2 sample calcined at (1) 450°C, (2) 550°C, (3) 650°C, and (*) sample without thermal treatment. (A: anatase phase; R: rutile phase).
306
Photocatalytic Degradation
The XRD patterns of synthesized titania matrix calcined at different temperatures are reported in Fig. 3 (Curve 1-3). Curves 1 and 2 report three broad peaks and one intense peak at 38.01°, 47.5°, 54.20° and 25.1°, which are firmly indicative of TiO2 of anatase phase [17]. Additionally curve (3) shows a few small peaks at 27.3°, 36.0° and 39.60°, and 41.2° which are closely related to rutile phase. No additional peaks belonging to other phases are observed. The remarkable width of the peaks associated with the TiO2 phase suggests that the size of the particle is quite small (Fig. 3, curve 1 and 2). From full width at half maxima (FWHM) of the peaks at 25.1° and 38.01° and by using Scherrer’s equation, Lc =Kλ/(β cos θ) [24] (where λ is the X-ray wavelength, β is the FWHM of the diffraction line, θ is the diffraction angle, and K is a constant, which has been assumed to be 0.9), the average particle diameter of about 4 nm can be calculated. This result is strongly consistent with the SEM result described above. In conclusion, by comparing the results coming from the different techniques, it comes out that the investigated samples contain nanosized anatase particles of size (~4 nm). Of course, curve 3 gives a certain amount (14%) of rutile phase due to calcining the sample at high temperature (650°C). The XRD pattern of sample without thermal treatment is shown as pattern (*, Fig. 3). It is revealed that the sample contains only hydrogen titanate which is confirmed by the standard sample analysis (the vertical lines). 3.2. Photocatalytic activity The UV-Vis absorption spectra with increasing illumination time are shown in Figs. 4, 5 and 6. Fig. 4 shows the decrease of MB band on TiO2 sample upon solar-like light
Absorbance
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2
i
i 00 min ii 120 min iii 240 min iv 360 min v 480 min vi 600 min vii 720 min viii 840 min ix 960 min
ii iii
0.7
Absorbance
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2
500
v vi vii viii ix 600
i 00 min ii 60 min iii 150 min iv 180 min v 240 min vi 270 min vii 300 min viii 510 min
500
600
(b)
i
0.6 0.5
iii
0.4
iv
0.3
v
0.2 0.1
vii 700
500 800 400 Wavelength (nm)
(c)
i ii iii iv v
600
i 00 min ii 150 min iii 210 min iv 270 min v 330 min vi 390 min vii 480 min
700
i
600
0.7 0.6
ii 0.5
iii 0.4
iv
0.3 0.2 0.1
vi vii 500 800 400 Wavelength (nm)
0.0 800
(d)
v
700
0.7
ii
vi
vi vii viii
0.1 0.0 400
i 00 min ii 90 min iii 150 min iv 210 min v 270 min vi 330 min vii 480 min
iv
0.1 0.0 400
(a)
Absorbance
0.6
Absorbance
0.7
700
0.0 800
Fig. 4. UV-vis spectral changes of MB spectra under solar-like light exposure using (a) TiO2 (without thermal treatment), TiO2 calcined at (b) 450°C, (c) 550°C and 650°C.
M. Z. B. Mukhlish et al. J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
0.25 Absorbance
0.20
ii
0.15
iii 0.10 0.05 0.00 400
Absorbance
i 00 min ii 135 min iii 270 min iv 405 min v 540 min vi 675 min vii 810 min viii 900 min
iv v vi vii viii 500
0.30
i
0.25
ii
0.20
iii
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 400
i 00 min ii 60 min iii 120 min iv 210 min v 300 min vi 390 min vii 510 min viii 660 min
ii iii iv v
600
700
0.20 0.15 0.10
i ii iii iv v vi vii viii
v vi vii viii 600
700
0.05
800 400 500 Wavelength (nm)
(c) 90 min 150 min 210 min 270 min 330 min 480 min 660 min 840 min
0.30 0.25
vi vii viii
iv
500
(b)
i
Absorbance
(a)
i
600
700
0.00 800
iv
0.30 i 30 min (d) ii 90 min 0.25 iii 120 min iv 210 min 0.20 v 360 min vi 480 min 0.15 vii 570 min
v
0.10
vi vii
0.05
i ii iii
800 400 500 Wavelength (nm)
600
700
Absorbance
0.30
307
0.00 800
Fig. 5. UV-vis spectral changes of congo red spectra under solar-like light exposure using (a) TiO2 (without thermal treatment), TiO2 calcined at (b) 450°C, (c) 550°C and 650°C.
Absorbance
0.5 0.4 0.3
i 0 min ii 30 min iii 60 min iv 90 min v 120 min vi 150 min
0.2
0.7
Absorbance
0.6 0.5 0.4
(a)
ii
i 15 min ii 30 min iii 60 min iv 75 min v 90 min vi 120 min vii 150 min
iii iv v vi
0.1 0.0 400
i
500
600
i 15 min ii 30 min iii 60 min iv 90 min v 120 min vi 150 min
700 i ii
iii
0.3
800 400 500 Wavelength (nm) (c)
(b)
i
0.7 0.6
ii
0.5 0.4
vii 600
i 30 min ii 60 min iii 90 min iv 120 min v 150 min vi 180 min vii 210 min
iii
0.3
iv
0.2
v vi
0.1
700
0.0 800
(d)
i
0.7 0.6 0.5
ii
0.4
iii
0.3
iv
0.2
iv
v
0.2
0.1
v vi
vi vii
0.1
0.0 400
500
600
700
400 500 800 Wavelength (nm)
600
Absorbance
0.6
700
Absorbance
0.7
0.0 800
Fig. 6. UV-vis spectral changes of methylene blue spectra under solar-like light exposure using (a) P25 (without thermal treatment), P25 calcined at (b) 450°C, (c) 550°C and 650°C.
308
Photocatalytic Degradation
exposure while Fig. 5 shows the same using CR on TiO2. Fig. 6 reports the photocatalytic activity of P25, the best TiO2 photocatalyst on MB under solar-like light illumination. The maximum UV-Vis absorptions for MB and CR are at the wavelength of 664 nm and 498 nm respectively. The maximum absorption occurred almost at the same wavelength throughout the photo degradation period. The absorption band in the range of 500-750 nm was observed for MB (Figs. 4 and 6) while for CR it was in the range of 400-600 nm (Fig. 5). The absorbance of the spectra rapidly decreased with increasing irradiation time (Figs. 4-6) and the peak of spectra almost disappeared after few hours solar irradiation as TiO2 promotes catalytic photo degradation of dyes. This is not unexpected since the photo catalytic activity of TiO2 is well known [17]. The chromophores responsible for characteristic color of the dyes (MB and CR) were broken down and the dyes were degraded with time. The disappearance rate of the absorption band due to MB adsorbed on P25 is much faster than that observed in case of synthesized TiO2. A small band around 600 nm wavelength for both case of TiO2 (P25) and synthesized TiO2 was observed because two aromatic rings in MB starts to degrade creating a mono substituted molecule. This indicates that the photodegradation not only destroys the conjugate system (including −N=N−) but also breaks down partially or totally the intermediate products [19-25]. Comparing the two dyes, it is observed that chemical structure of MB lends itself more to oxidation by hydroxyl radicals, than does CR. Moreover, it is possible that MB absorbs less UV light than CR. This would make more photons available to impinge on the catalyst and promote the formation of hydroxyl radicals. However it must be acknowledged that the degradation comparisons between the two dyes are made on a mass basis. On a molecular basis the analysis is much different. MB and CR have molecular weights of 320 and 697 respectively. The pohotoatalytic degradation kinetics of MB and CR on TiO2 samples and reference P25 are shown in Figs. 7a-c. It can be inferred that degradation of dye (MB or CR) is slower with noncalcined TiO2 compared to the calcined sample. About 91% degradation of MB (Fig. 7a) is observed within 420 and 780 min. in presence of calcined and noncalcained TiO2 sample, respectively. About 90% degradation of CR (Fig. 7b) is achieved within 570 min. for TiO2 calcined at 650°C, while the same percentage of degradation requires 660 and 780 min. for TiO2 calcined at 450° and 550°C, respectively. Calcination at higher temperature causes dehydration of TiO4H8 (TiO4H8 → TiO2 + H2O) producing more active sites and consequently, enhances adsorption and photodegradation. An important result obtained from Fig. 7c is that the noncalcined TiO2 (P25) particles are comparatively more active in MB degradation than calcined particles. P25 calcined at the highest temperature (650°C) shows the lowest degradation performance among the calcined samples. This is not unexpected. Commercial TiO2 contains both anatase and rutile phases. The photocatalytic activity of anatase is higher than rutile nanocrystalline TiO2 [4]. As TiO2 is calcined at high temperature some anatase particles are transformed into rutile phase causing lower performance in MB degradation.
M. Z. B. Mukhlish et al. J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
309
1.0 1.0
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
a
0.8
b
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
0.6
C/C0
C/C0
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0
0.0 0
200
400
600
800
1000
Irradiation time 1.0
c
0.8
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Irradiation time
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
C/C0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 0
20
40
60
80
100 120 140 160 180 200 220
Irradiation time
Fig. 7. Photocatalytic degradation kinetics of a) MB, and b) CR on TiO2 sample, and c) MB on TiO2 (P25) calcained at 450°C, 550°C and 650°C.
3.3 Photocatalytic degradation kinetic models The experimental kinetic data were treated with four types of kinetic models (zoro-order, first-order, parabolic-diffusion, and modified Freundlich model, Figs. 8-10) to investigate the mechanism of successive adsorption and degradation process. The model parameter k as well as the correlation coefficient (R²) are shown in Tables 1-3. The kinetic data of the MB and CR adsorption simultaneous photodegradation on TiO2 and P25 are well described by the Modified Freundlich and first order models. From Figs. 10 and 11, it can be observed that the adsorption kinetics of MB and CR on the assynthesized titanate nanoparticles may be described more precisely by the Modified Freundlich model and the dyes are adsorbed to the titanate surface by monolayer adsorption [26] and the molecules follow successive photocatalytic degradation. The zeroorder and parabolic-diffusion models were not suitable to explain the whole photocatalytic degradation process. The modified Freundlich model fits the kinetic data with linear correlation coefficient of R² = ~0.99 (Table 1) for MB and R² = ~0.99 (Table 2) for CR photocatalytic degradation using synthesized TiO2. The modified Freundlich model, in fact, describes heterogeneous diffusion from the flat surface via molecular ion exchange. Moreover, the kinetic model prediction suggests similarities in the photocatalytic activity
310
Photocatalytic Degradation
of synthesized TiO2 and P25. The modified Freundlich model fits the kinetic data with R2 = ~0.97≈0.98 for MB degradation using P25.
-5
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
-3 -2
-1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4
-1 0 0
-0.2 200
400 600 t (min)
800
0
1000
200
400 600 t (min)
(d)
(1-C/C0)/t
0.003 (without calcination) 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
0.002
0.001
0.000 0.15
0.20
0.25 0.30 -1/2 t
0.35
0.40
1.2
1000
-1.4 without calcination -1.2 0 450 C -1.0 0 550 C 0 -0.8 650 C
0.004
(c)
800
-0.6
log(1-C/C0)
C-C0
-4
-1.8
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
(b)
(a)
log(C/C0)
-6
-0.4 -0.2 1.6
2.0 2.4 log(t)
2.8
0.0 3.2
Fig. 8. Photocatalytic degradation Kinetics of (a) Zero-order, (b) First-order, (c) Parabolic diffusion (d) Modified-Freundlich model of MB on TiO2 and TiO2 calcined at 450°C, 550° and 650°C. Table 1. Linear correlation coefficients (R2) and rate constant (k) of the zero-order (mol L-1m-1), first-order (m-1), parabolic diffusion (mg kg-1s-0.5) and modified Freundlich (Lg-1m-1) kinetic models for photo catalytic degradation of MB on TiO2 (without thermal treatment) and TiO2 calcined at 450°C, 550°C and 650 °C. Kinetic Models
Without calcination
450°C
550°C
650°C
R²
k
R²
k
R²
k
R²
k
0.903
0.0061
0.968
0.0102
0.374
0.0083
0.807
0.0113
First order
0.991
0.00134
0.960
0.0023
0.446
0.0022
0.942
0.0023
Parabollic diffusion
0.949
0.0108
0.846
0.0047
0.343
0.0073
0.661
0.0044
Modified Freundlich
0.993
0.0153
0.991
0.0073
0.987
0.0095
0.988
0.0047
Zero order
M. Z. B. Mukhlish et al. J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
-2.5
-6
(b)
-5
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
-3 -2 -1 0 0
200
400 600 t (min)
800
1000
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5
0
200
400
600
t (min)
(c)
0.0040
(d)
0.0030 0.0025
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
0.0020 0.0015 0.0010 0.0005
-1.2
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
0.0035 (1-C/C0)/t
0.0 1000
800
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6
log(1-C/C0)
C-C0
-4
-2.0 log(C/C0)
(a)
0.0000
311
-0.4 -0.2 0.0
0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1 2.4 log(t)
-1/2
t
2.7
3.0
Fig. 9. Photocatalytic degradation kinetics of (a) Zero-order, (b) First-order, (c) Parabolic diffusion (d) Modified-Freundlich model of CR on TiO2 (without thermal treatment) and TiO2 calcined at 450°C, 550°C and 650°C.
Table 2. Linear correlation coefficients (R2) and rate constant (k) of the zero-order (mol L-1m-1), first-order (m-1), parabolic diffusion (mg kg-1s-0.5) and modified Freundlich (Lg-1m-1) kinetic models for photo catalytic degradation of CR on TiO2 (without thermal treatment) and TiO2 calcined at 450°C, 550° and 650°C. Kinetics model
Without calcination R²
450ºC
550ºC
650ºC
k
R²
k
R²
k
R²
k
Zero order
0.8784
0.0062
0.951
0.0085
0.8751
0.0074
0.756
0.0092
First order
0.996
0.00115
0.987
0.00144
0.755
0.0014
0.973
0.0016
Parabollic diffusion
0.631
0.005
0.942
0.011
0.800
0.011
0.364
0.00397
Modified Freundlich
0.995
0.00626
0.996
0.0135
0.988
0.0069
0.987
0.0052
Photocatalytic Degradation
(a)
(b)
-5
C-C0
-4
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
-3 -2
-2.8
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
-2.4 -2.0 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8
-1 0
-0.4 0
30
60
90 120 150 180 210 t (min)
0.004
0
50
0.002
100 150 t (min)
0.0 250
200
-1.2
(d) (c) without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
0.003 (1-C/C0)/t
log(C/C0)
-6
without calcination 0 450 C 0 550 C 0 650 C
-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4
log(1-C/C0)
312
0.001 -0.2 0.000 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.0 -1/2 t
0.4
0.8
1.2 log(t)
1.6
0.0 2.4
2.0
Fig. 10. Photocatalytic degradation kinetics of (a) Zero-order, (b) First-order, (c) Parabolic diffusion (d) Modified-Freundlich model of MB on TiO2 (P25) and TiO2 (P25) calcined at 450°C, 550° and 650°C. Table 3. Linear correlation coefficients (R2) and rate constant (k) of the zero-order (mol L-1m-1), first-order (m-1), parabolic diffusion (mg kg-1s-0.5) and modified Freundlich (Lg-1m-1) kinetic models for photo catalytic degradation of MB on TiO2 (P25) and TiO2 (P25) calcined at 450°C, 550° and 650°C. Kinetic Model
Without calcination R
2
450°C 2
550°C 2
650°C 2
k
R
k
R
k
R
Zero order
0.800
0.0394
0.903
0.0395
0.879
0.0377
0.949
0.0258
k
First order Parabolic diffusion Modified Freundlich
0.997
0.0106
0.966
0.0122
0.910
0.012
0.968
0.0055
0.631
0.005
0.942
0.0110
0.742
0.0057
0.364
0.0039
0.970
0.1456
0.975
0.0407
0.968
0.034
0.984
0.0145
4. Conclusion Photocatalytic degradation using TiO2 is successfully applied for the textile dyes (MB and CR). The results confirm that the sol-gel method is a good way to prepare anatase TiO2 nanoparticle. The prepared TiO2 shows a high photocatalytic activity for the degradation of MB and CR. The decolorization and degradation efficiency depend upon the
M. Z. B. Mukhlish et al. J. Sci. Res. 5 (2), 301-314 (2013)
313
calcinations of catalyst. In this study it is observed that the first order and Freundlich model fit the kinetic data well. Though commercial TiO2 is more efficient, the synthesized TiO2 can also effectively remove the dyes (MB and CR) from wastewater. References 1. P. S. Kumar, S. Ramalingam, C. Senthamarai, M. Niranjanaa, P. Vijayalakshmi, and S. Sivanesan, Desalination 252, 149 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.10.010 2. M. S. I. Mozumder and M. A. Islam, J. Sci. Res. 2, 567 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v2i3.4302 3. M. A. M. Arami, N. M. Mahmoodi, and A. Akbari, Desalination 267, 1107 (2010). 4. R. J. Tayade, P. K. Surolia, R. G. Kulkarni, and R. V. Jarsa, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 8, 455 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2007.05.006 5. C. H. Hung, P. C. Chiang, C. Yuan, and C. Y. Chou, J. Water Sci. Technol. 2, 313 (2001). 6. C. Nasr, K. Vindgopal, S. Hotchandani, A. K. Chattopadhyay, and P. V. Kamat, Res. Chem. Inter. 23, 219 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856797X00439 7. K. Vinodgopal, I. Budja, and P. V. Kamat, Chem. Mater. 8, 2180 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm950425y 8. M. M. Alam, M. Z. Bin Mukhlish, S. Uddin, S. Das, K. Ferdous, M. M. R. Khan , and M. A. Islam, J. Sci. Res. 4, 665 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v4i3.8654 9. S. Somekawa, Y. Kusumoto, H. Yang, M. Abdulla-Al-Mamun, and B. Ahmmad, J. Sci. Res. 2, 17 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v2i1.2992 10. M. S. Anwer, S. Kumar, F. Ahmed, N. Arshi, C. G. Lee, and B. H. Koo, J. Nanosci. Tecnol. 12, 1555 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2012.4634 11. R. W. Siegel, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 21, 559 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.003015 12. H. Y. Kyunghee, J. H. Fendler, Langmuir 6, 1519(1990). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la00099a015 13. H. C. Youn, S. Baral, and J. H. Fendler, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 6320 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100333a029 14. J. H. Fendler, Chem. Rev. 87, 877(1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr00081a002 15. M. Toba, F. Mizukami, S. Niwa, T. Sano, K. Maeda, A. Annila, and V. Komppa, J. Molec. Catal. 1, 277 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-5102(94)00040-9 16. X. Gao, and E. Wachs, Catal. Today 51, 233(1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S09205861(99)00048-6 17. M. J. Uddin, F. Cesano, F. Bonino, S. Bordiga, G. Spoto, D. Scarano, and A. Zecchina, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 189, 286 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.02.015 18. M. J. Uddin, F. Cesano, S. Bertarione, F. Bonino, S. Bordiga, D. Scarano, and A. Zecchina, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 196, 165 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.07.037 19. F. Cesano, S. Bertarione, M. J. Uddin, G. Agostini, D. Scarano, and A. Zecchina, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 169 (2009). 20. D. L. Sparks, Harcourt. Jovanovich Publishers: San Diego, (1989), Kinetics of Soil Chemical Process. 21. Z. H. Li, Langmuir 15, 6438 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la981535x 22. E. Demirbas, M. Kobya, E. Senturk, and T. Ozkan, Water SA. 30, 533 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v30i4.5106 23. T. Kodama, Y. Harada, M. Ueda, K. Shimizu, K. Shuto, and S. Komarneni, Langmuir 17, 488 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la001774w 24. L. S. Birks and H. Friedman, J. Appl. Phys. 17 687 (1946). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1707771
314
Photocatalytic Degradation
25. S. Al-Oaradawi and S. R. Salman, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 148, 161 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00086-2 26. Y. W. L. Lim, T. Yuxin, Y. H. Cheng, and Z. Chen, Nanoscale 2, 2751 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00440e