Plant molecular stress responses face climate change

0 downloads 0 Views 890KB Size Report
All content following this page was uploaded by Ishita Ahuja on 07 July 2017. The user has requested ... temperature, salinity and rising CO2 affect plant growth and pose a .... ribosomal protein, PS II and PS q(b) proteins, and auxin-binding proteins, while ..... over-accumulation induces ionic and osmotic stress in plants [66].
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46288072

Plant Molecular Stress Responses Face Climate Change Article in Trends in Plant Science · December 2010 DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002 · Source: PubMed

CITATIONS

READS

346

2,416

4 authors: Ishita Ahuja

Ric De Vos

Norwegian University of Science and Technol…

Wageningen University & Research

40 PUBLICATIONS 940 CITATIONS

266 PUBLICATIONS 11,580 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

SEE PROFILE

Atle Magnar Bones

Robert David Hall

Norwegian University of Science and Technol…

Wageningen University & Research

248 PUBLICATIONS 6,188 CITATIONS

197 PUBLICATIONS 7,670 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: FICP Funded Project: Studying Plant Defence Responses in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) for Sustainable Pest Management View project 13C-labelled plant extracts as internal standards View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Ishita Ahuja on 07 July 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.

Review

Plant molecular stress responses face climate change Ishita Ahuja1,2, Ric C.H. de Vos2,3, Atle M. Bones1 and Robert D. Hall2,3,4 1

Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Realfagbygget, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands 3 Centre for BioSystems Genomics, P.O. Box 98, 6700 AB Wageningen, The Netherlands 4 Netherlands Metabolomics Centre, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands 2

Environmental stress factors such as drought, elevated temperature, salinity and rising CO2 affect plant growth and pose a growing threat to sustainable agriculture. This has become a hot issue due to concerns about the effects of climate change on plant resources, biodiversity and global food security. Plant adaptation to stress involves key changes in the ‘-omic’ architecture. Here, we present an overview of the physiological and molecular programs in stress adaptation focusing on how genes, proteins and metabolites change after individual and multiple environmental stresses. We address the role which ‘-omics’ research, coupled to systems biology approaches, can play in future research on plants seemingly unable to adapt as well as those which can tolerate climatic change. Plant reprogramming to survive in a changing climate To survive, sessile plants must cope with climate change catastrophes or so-called environmental stress factors such as drought, elevated temperatures, elevated [CO2] and salinity – both individually, or more commonly, in combination. Climate change catastrophes impact on all aspects of plant architecture and represent a serious challenge for developing sustainable agriculture at a time of significant growth in the global population [1–12]. To cope with climate change catastrophes, plants have evolved a wide spectrum of molecular programs to sense change rapidly and adapt accordingly [4–6,10,12–29]. Understanding these reprogramming events under constantly changing environmental conditions has been a subject of great interest for many decades. Nevertheless, there is still a significant knowledge gap and we are generally unable to predict how well plants will cope with these challenges. Specifically, such insight is required to breed crops or produce transgenic varieties with enhanced tolerance to multiple environmental stress factors, because in nature, plants are often simultaneously exposed to multiple environmental perturbations. Here, we discuss some of the most recent physiological and molecular programs identified in plants which are of relevance to global climate change factors. We focus on the four major abiotic stresses, drought, elevated temperature, salt and elevated [CO2] (Box 1), both individually and as multiple stresses. Looking to the future, we present the potential value of systems biology approaches to investiCorresponding author: Hall, R.D. ([email protected]).

664

gate biological networks in order to understand and improve plant responses to environmental stress (for a list of all gene and protein abbreviations used throughout this paper see Table 1). Physiological and molecular programs: adaptive strategies Plant adaptive strategies to stress are coordinated and fine-tuned by adjusting growth, development, cellular and molecular activities. Significant progress has been made in understanding the physiological, cellular and molecular mechanisms of plant responses to environmental stress factors. Responses to perturbations are usually accompanied by major changes in the plant transcriptome, proteome and metabolome [14,16,19,20,30–39]. Recent research has made efficient use of these ‘omic’ approaches to identify transcriptional, proteomic and metabolic networks linked to stress perception and response – not only in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) but also in crop, garden and woody species [16,18,20,30–34,40–45]. The wide range of genes, proteins and enzymes that impart resistance or are regulated in response to environmental stress factors have been summarised in Table 1 and Table S1 (see online supplementary material) with their descriptions and known or putative mechanisms of function. In addition, metabolites reported to increase or decrease during plant adaptations to these environmental stress factors have been summarised in Table 2. Drought Drought or continuous water deficit is one of the most important factors affecting plant growth, development, survival and crop productivity [1,6,8,29,32,38,39,46–49]. Physiological responses to drought include stomatal closure, decreased photosynthetic activity, altered cell wall elasticity, and even generation of toxic metabolites causing plant death. Concomitant molecular re-programming includes extensive changes in gene expression incurring alterations in the biochemical and proteomic machinery [1,6,10,13,32,33,38,46,47,49–51]. Here we discuss key molecular programs proposed to confer tolerance to drought stress along with their envisaged modes of action (Table 1, Table S1). Specific focus is given to abscisic acid (ABA)dependent, ABA-independent (Figure 1a), DREB2A and ubiquitination-related mechanisms (Figure 1b). ABA is a key signalling intermediate that controls the expression of many genes. It decreases water loss by

1360-1385/$ – see front matter ß 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002 Trends in Plant Science, December 2010, Vol. 15, No. 12

Review

Trends in Plant Science

Vol.15 No.12

Box 1. Elevated carbon dioxide e[CO2] – the greenhouse gas story e[CO2] is the most publically recognised aspect of climate change. Continued human activity, deforestation, anthropogenic fossil fuel burning and industrialisation are the cause of e[CO2]. [CO2] (currently 390.09 ppm; July, 2010; http://co2now.org/), due to constant CO2 emissions at year values, would lead to concentrations of about 520 ppm by 2100 [12], inevitably resulting in significant changes to vegetation and agricultural plant productivity [5]. Plants sense and respond to e[CO2] through increased photosynthesis and decreased stomatal conductance in a broad range of species under different conditions [100]. e[CO2] affects flowering time and is possibly as influential as temperature in determining future changes in plant developmental timing. e[CO2] was shown to affect the expression of floral-initiation genes in Arabidopsis [18]. Moreover, delayed flowering under e[CO2] was associated with sustained expression of FLC, in an e[CO2]-adapted genotype. In response to e[CO2], Arabidopsis showed downregulation of transcripts related to photosynthesis, the Calvin cycle, photorespiration, photosystem (PS) I and II subunits, light harvesting and electron transport [19]. In contrast, upregulated transcripts included genes linked to carbon metabolism and utilisation, cellulose synthesis enzymes, cell wall proteins, glycolysis, trehalose metabolism, callose biosynthesis, and fructokinase involved in starch/sucrose degradation [19]. In contrast, in aspen (Populus tremuloides) long-term exposure to e[CO2] caused

regulating stomatal aperture [1,6,47,52], and has a broad range of essential functions in plant adaptation to several stress factors, including drought resistance [1,6,13,28,47,50,52–55] (Figure 1a). Several abiotic stress-inducible genes are controlled by ABA, but others are not, indicating involvement of both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent regulatory systems [55]. Moreover, major cis-acting elements, such as the ABA-responsive element (ABRE) and the dehydration responsive element/C-repeat (DRE/CRT) have been shown to be important to ABA-dependent and ABA-independent gene expression in abiotic stress responses [55]. NFYA5 was strongly induced in an ABA-dependent manner and its induction occurred both at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels [47]. Analysis of nfya5 knockout or NFYA5 overexpression lines showed NFYA5 to be important in controlling stomatal aperture and drought resistance. OCP3 also plays a pivotal role in the signal pathway controlling drought tolerance through modulation of ABA-mediated stomatal closure [6]. MYB96 is proposed to function as a molecular link by integrating ABA and auxin signals [1]. Suppression of FTA in canola using the AtHPR1 promoter to drive an RNAi construct, resulted in yield protection under drought stress in the field [53]. SAL1 acts as a negative regulator of ABA-independent and ABA-dependent stress response pathways such that its inactivation results in altered osmoprotectants, higher relative leaf water content and maintenance of viable tissues during prolonged drought [50]. Upregulation of ABA-responsive genes in msi1-cs (MSI1 co-suppression) lines suggests that MSI1 plays a role in the negative regulation of drought-stress response [54] through the binding of MSI1 to the chromatin of the drought-inducible downstream target RD20. PLDa1-mediated ABA effects, through interaction with PP2C and G protein, show a bifurcated signalling pathway [52]. However, high PLDa1 affected the water deficit response by promoting early stomatal closure, but disrupted membranes after prolonged drought stress [28]. Moreover, a

upregulation of photosynthesis genes encoding chloroplast 30S ribosomal protein, PS II and PS q(b) proteins, and auxin-binding proteins, while aquaporin plasma membrane intrinsic protein PIPa2 showed downregulation [44]. In another transcriptomic study in aspen, it was suggested that a CO2-responsive genotype partitions carbon into pathways associated with active defence and/or response to stress, carbohydrate and/or starch biosynthesis and subsequent growth, while a CO2-unresponsive genotype partitions carbon into pathways associated with passive defence (e.g. lignin and phenylpropanoids) and cell wall thickening [31]. However, a proteomic response of rice to e[CO2] showed differential expression of proteins belonging to photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, and energy pathways [20]. Several molecular chaperones and ascorbate peroxidase also responded to e[CO2]. Furthermore, the combination of e[CO2] and iron (Fe) limitation induced morphological, physiological, and molecular responses, enhancing the plant’s capacity to access and utilise Fe from Fe(III)-oxide [5]. All these transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic studies show regulation of novel genes, proteins and metabolites emphasising changes in photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, growth, amino acids, sugars, starch and other metabolic processes. The current molecular data of plant adaptations to e[CO2] still seem rudimentary and future studies should be oriented more towards finding genes that can impart resistance to e[CO2] with specific focus on crop plants.

feedback mechanism was found to link the circadian clock with plant responses to drought [13]. TOC1 is induced by ABA, and this induction is gated by the clock and determines the timing of TOC1 binding to the ABAR promoter. Molecular-genetic studies showed the existence of a negative feedback loop in which TOC1 negatively regulates the expression of ABAR, whose activity is in turn necessary for TOC1 activation by ABA [13]. The studies above emphasise the regulational complexity of transcriptional and post-transcriptional cell programs in stomatal guard cell responses involving different action modes add new information on the role of ABA in mediating drought responses. The induction of NFYA5 by ABA and drought at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels shows its critical importance in imparting drought resistance [47]. The functioning of MYB96 as a molecular link mediating ABA–auxin crosstalk in both drought stress response and lateral root growth represents an adaptive strategy under drought stress conditions [1]. In this regard, the conditional and specific downregulation of FTA in canola shows significant progress towards engineering drought tolerance in this important crop [53]. To enhance our knowledge about the effect of chromatin modifications on plant stress responses, the authors aim to characterise MSI1 function in regulating drought stress responses [54]. In addition, new information on PLDa1 pathway-mediated drought responses may be exploited to produce plants with increased water-use efficiency and drought tolerance [28,52]. Ubiquitination plays a role in a variety of biological processes, but our understanding of its exact role in abiotic stress is still limited [9]. The transcription factors DREB1A/CBF3 and DREB2A specifically interact with cis-acting DRE/CRT involved in cold and drought stressresponsive gene expression in Arabidopsis [10]. Recent insights suggest DREB2A and ubiquitination (post-translational attachment of ubiquitin) are related to the modulation of drought response through DREB2A-regulated gene expression, drought tolerance of Arabidopsis plants 665

Review

Trends in Plant Science Vol.15 No.12

Table 1. Reference table abbreviations of genes/proteins associated with abiotic stresses detailed in this article Gene ABAR ABI1 AP37, 59 At1g09350

Name ABA-related ABA Insensitive APETELA 37, 59 Galactinol synthase (GolS3)

Refs [13,91] [52,91] [46] [51]

Name Increased tolerance to NaCl1 Late embryogenesis abundant Leaf Wilting 1 Enolase 2/Low expression of osmotically responsive genes 1 [10] LTP3, 4 Lipid transfer protein 3, 4 At1g22985 AP2 - DNA binding protein [51] miR169 MicroRNA 169A At3g50970 Dehydrin xero2 [10] MSI1 Chromatin modifying protein At1g52690 LEA protein [51] MT2A Metallothionein 2A At1g56600 Galactinol synthase, (GolS2) [10,91] MYB96 MYB transcription factor 96 At1g69870 Proton-dependent oligopeptide transport [54] NCED3 Nine-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3 At1g80160 Lactoylglutathione lyase/glyoxalase 1 [10] NFYA5 Nuclear factor Y A5 At3g53990 Universal stress protein [51] OCP3 Overexpressor of cationic peroxidase 3 At3g55940 Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C [51] OsABF1 O. sativa ABA responsive element At4g36010 Thaumatin family protein binding factor 1 A. thaliana homeobox 7 [30,91] OsDREB2A O. sativa DREB protein 2A ATHB-7 Boea hygrometrica heat shock factor [62] OsRMC O. sativa root meander curling BhHsf1 Binding protein [22] PAO Polyamine oxidase BiP BOBBER1 [59] PF3-D, 5 Prefoldins 3 and 5 BOB1 Basic domain/leucine zipper60 [22] PIP2 Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate bZIP60 Calmodulin-binding protein kinase 3 [61] PIPK Phosphatidylinositolphosphate kinase CBK3 Cajanus cajan hybrid-proline-rich protein [75] PLD Phospholipase D CcHyPRP Cold Regulated [77] PLDa1 Phospholipase Da1 COR Cold Regulated 47 [22,91] POX22.3, 8.1 Peroxidases 22.3 and 8.1 COR47 Dwarf and delayed flowering 1 [65] PP2C Protein phosphatase 2C DDF1 Gibberellic acid signal mediators [65] PUB22, 23 Plant U-Boxes 22 and 23 DELLA Dehydrin genes [49] Rab16A Rice ABA responsive gene 16A DHN Dehydration-responsive element [10,91] RBOHC & Respiratory burst oxidase DREB2A binding protein 2 RBOHD homologs C and D DREB2A-interacting proteins 1, 2 [56,91] RCA Rubisco activase DRIP1, 2 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase [29] RCA1 Short isoform of RCA DSM1 Ethylene response factor [30,91] RD20 Responsive to desiccation 20 ERF Flowering locus C [18] RD22 Responsive to desiccation 22 FLC a-farnesyltransferase [53] RD29A, B Responsive to desiccation 29A FTA Filamentous temperature-sensitive [4] Rma1H1 RING membrane-anchor 1 E3 ubiquitin ligase FtsH11 Gibberellic Acid 2-oxidase 7 [65] ROF1 Rotmase FK506 Binding Protein 1 GA2ox7 auxin conjugating enzyme [1] RPN12a Regulatory particle non-ATPase 12a GH3 G. max WRKY transcription factor [45] SAL1 3’(2’), 5’-biphosphate nucleocidase GmWRKY GTP-binding protein [25,52] Ser 228 Autophosphorylation site of SOS2 G protein Glycine-rich protein 7 [72,91] SODs Superoxide dismutases GRP7 S-nitrosoglutathione reductase [63] SOR Superoxide reductase GSNOR High affinity potassium transporter 1 [71] SOS2 Salt Overly Sensitive 2 HKT1;1 Hyper-osmotically sensitive gene [73] TaSnRK2.4 T. aestivum serine/threonine protein kinase HOS3 Sensitive to hot temperatures [63] TdDHN T. durum dehydrins HOT5 Hydroxypyruvate reductase [53] TOC1 Timing of CAB expression 1 HPR1 Heat Shock Factor 1A [61,91] TsVP Thellungiella halophila V-H+-PPase HSFA1a + Heat Shock Transcription Factor A3 [26,91] V-H -PPase Vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase HsfA3 Hordeum vulgare C-repeat binding factor 4 [7] V-ATPase Vacuolar H+-ATPase HvCBF4 [51] WLIP19 Wheat low-temperature induced protein 19 InsP5-ptase Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase Isoprene synthase [58] ISPS

expressing InsP5-ptase and the roles of DRIP1 and DRIP2, Rma1H1, PUB22 and PUB23 (Figure 1b) [2,9,10,51,56]. The overexpression of constitutively-active DREB2A resulted in significant drought stress tolerance by regulating drought-responsive gene expression [10]. Two novel proteins, DRIP1 and DRIP2, were suggested to act as novel regulators in drought-responsive gene expression by targeting DREB2A protein to 26 s proteosome proteolysis [56]. DREB2A and a subset of DREB2A-regulated genes and drought tolerance of the InsP5-ptase plants to be mediated partly via a DREB2A-dependent pathway [51]. PUB22 and PUB23 were shown to function as negative regulators. PUB22- and PUB23-overexpressers were hypersensitive to drought stress while loss-of-function pub22 and pub23 mutants showed enhanced drought-tolerance [2]. The same was found for Rma1H1 overexpression in 666

Gene ITN1 LEA LEW1 LOS2

Refs [27] [30,49,77] [22] [35,91] [54,91] [47] [54,91] [10] [1] [30,91] [47,91] [6] [76] [66] [66] [69] [23] [25] [25] [25] [28] [29] [30,91] [2,91] [66] [27,91] [24] [24] [54,91] [27] [22,30,91] [9,91] [21,91] [2,91] [50,91] [67] [57] [64] [67] [74] [49] [13] [8] [8] [35] [77]

transgenic Arabidopsis [9]. Rma1H1 was proposed to play a critical role in the downregulation of plasma membrane aquaporin levels by inhibiting aquaporin trafficking to the plasma membrane and subsequent degradation as a response to dehydration in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. These findings highlight the importance of the transcription factor DREB2A and ubiquitination in drought stress responses. DREB2A protein stability and its activation, regulate drought stress-responsive gene expression and leads to drought stress tolerance [10]. The InsP 5-ptase results indicate that coordinated regulation of DREB2A and a subset of DREB2A-regulated genes can help confer drought tolerance without adversely affecting plant growth [51]. The selective regulation of this gene subset may prove a promising target for enhancing drought tolerance in crop plants. Other findings [2,9,56] have shown the

Review

Trends in Plant Science

Vol.15 No.12

Table 2. Plants metabolic adaptations to Climate Change Catastrophes/Environmental Stress Factors Plant Drought Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) wt and mutants (alx8, fry1-1, nc3-2, msi-cs)

Plant parts

Metabolites

Levels

Refs

Leaves, aerial parts

Accumulated/ increased

[38,50, 54,92]

Wheat (Triticum aestivum and Aegilops)

Accumulated/ increased/higher

[11,49]

Maize (Zea mays)

Seedlings, leaves, mature grains Xylem sap

ABA, amino acids, carbohydrate derivatives, organic acids, polyamine putrescine, sugar metabolites, carbon metabolites (starch, hexoses, sucrose, fumurate, malate, proline and total amino acids) ABA, fumaric acid, proline

Increased

[33]

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Leaves

Decreased Increased

[33] [93]

Pea (Pisum sativum)

Leaf

Decreased Higher

[93] [39]

Transgenic PSARK-IPT (Nicotiana tabacum) Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Leaf

Increased

[94]

Accumulated

[57]

Brassica (Brassica napus) Black poplar (Populus nigra) C4 grasses (Cynodon dactylon and Zoysia japonica) Elevated temperature Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)

Leaf Saplings Leaves

Succinate, sucrose, chlorophylls, carotenoids, oxidised lipids, ABA ABA Isoprene 5-hydroxyvaline

Highest Decreased Increased

[95] [58] [48]

St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum)

Shoots, flowers, flower buds Seedlings

Chicoric acid, chlorogenic acid Quercetin-3-O-glucoside, luteolin-7-O-glucoside Secondary metabolites (hyperforin, pseudohypericin and hypericin)

Increased Accumulated Increased

[43] [43] [34]

Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, phosphatidic acid

Accumulated

[25]

Polyamines (apoplastic spermine and spermidine) Fatty acids (linoleic, linolenic and stigmasterol), aquaporins of PIP1 and PIP2 subfamilies, glucosinolates Fatty acids (palmitoleic, oleic and sitosterol)

Increased Increased

[69] [68]

Decreased

[68]

Increased

[19]

Decreased Higher Decreased Increased Increased Increased Increased

[19] [95] [95,96] [97] [37] [98] [36]

Increased Increased Reduced

[99] [95] [22]

Arabidopsis and rice Salinity Maize (Z. mays) Brassica oleracea

Nodules

Seedlings

Leaf blade Leaves, roots

ABA, phaseic acid, p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, 6-benzylaminopurine trans-zeatin, trans-zeatin riboside, ferulic acid Proline, free amino acids, total and reducing sugars, polyphenol contents Chlorophylls, carotenoids, protein, starch Proline, valine, threonine, homoserine, myoinositol, aminobutyrate, trigonelline (nicotinic acid betaine) Glycerate

Elevated [CO2] Arabidopsis

Leaves

B. napus

Leaves

Cassava (Manihot esculenta) Maritime (Plantago maritima) Sugarcane (Saccharum ssp.) Soybean (Glycine max) Multiple environmental stresses Arabidopsis B. napus Arabidopsis (lew1)

Leaves Foliage, roots Leaves Leaves

Starch, glucose, galactose, maltose, malic acid, histidine, tryptophan, phenylanine other amino acids Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b ABA, indolic glucosinolate Cyanogenic glycosides Caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, verbascoside Sucrose Hexose, sucrose, starch, ureides, amino acids

Leaf Leaf Seedlings

Cuticular lipids Chlorophylls a and b, carotenoids, ABA Dolichol

importance of plant E3 ubiquitin ligases in mediating cellular responses to drought stress. DRIP1 and DRIP2 interact with DREB2A in the nucleus and function as E3 ubiquitin ligases and mediate DREB2A ubiquitination [56]. Furthermore, the authors of [2] suggest that PUB22 and PUB23 (U-box-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases) coordinately control a drought-signalling pathway by ubiquitinating cytosolic RPN12a, while the authors of [9] showed that drought stress-induced Rma1H1, a RING membrane-anchor E3 ubiquitin ligase homolog, regulates aquaporin levels via ubiquitination. Both results were obtained in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Apart from ABA, DREB2A and ubiquitination-related adaptations, other systems imparting drought-resistance diversely involve vacuolar membrane transport, unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway genes and reactive oxy-

gen species (ROS) signalling [8,22,29]. In maize (Zea mays), the heterologous expression of TsVP resulted in enhanced V-H+-PPase activity [8]. DSM1 is a novel nuclear protein kinase shown to play a critical role in drought and oxidative stress resistance in rice (Oryza sativa) by directly or indirectly regulating expression of POX22.3 and POX8.1 and ROS scavenging [29]. DHN genes (TdDHN15.2, TdDHN15.1, TdDHN13, TdDHN15.3 and TdDHN9.6) were induced in droughtstressed wheat (Triticum durum). In alfalfa (Medicago sativa), genes encoding anti-oxidant enzymes, such as SODs (CuZn-SOD, plastid FeSOD and MnSOD) were upregulated [57], whereas isoprene synthase (ISPS) mRNA transcript level and protein concentration decreased during drought stress in black poplar (Populus nigra) plants [58]. Thirty-six protein spots identified by 2D-PAGE and 667

(Figure_1)TD$IG][ Review

Trends in Plant Science Vol.15 No.12

Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of plant adaptations to drought, elevated temperature and salinity stress factors. (a) ABA-related adaptations to drought resistance. (i) NFYA5 is induced and miR169 is suppressed in an ABA-dependent manner. (ii) Activated PLDa1 mediates ABA signalling by a rapid stomatal closure. (iii) PLDa1 mediates ABA effects by interacting with PP2C and G protein. (iv) FTA downregulation enhances guard cell response to ABA, and leads to stomatal closure and reduced transpiration. (v) Drought tolerant mutant (alx8) has mutation in SAL1, such that its inactivation maintains viable tissues during prolonged water stress. (vi) MYB96 regulates drought resistance by mediating ABA/auxin-signalling through RD22 and GH3, respectively. (vii) ocp3 mutant is associated with increased ABA sensitivity in growth and stomatal closure, however no effect on water loss and ABA-responsive marker genes. (viii) Upregulation of ABA-responsive genes in msi-cs mutant and binding of MSI1 to chromatin suggests role of MSI1 in negative regulation of response to drought stress. (b) DREB2A and ubiquitination-related adaptations to drought resistance. (i) Overexpression of DREB2A regulates drought-responsive gene expression. (ii) Plants expressing InsP 5-ptase revealed DREB2A and DREB2A-regulated genes to be upregulated. (iii) DRIP1 and DRIP 2 proteins possibly function in stress signalling by blocking ubiquitination or proteolysis and plants under stress acquire sufficient DREB2A. Under normal growth conditions, DREB2A protein is expressed at low levels and to prevent activation, the translated DREB2A protein is recognised and ubiquitinated by the constitutively expressed DRIP1 and DRIP2 proteins and subjected to 26S proteosome proteolysis (iv) PUB22 and PUB23 co-ordinately control a drought signalling pathway by ubiquitinating cytosolic RPN12a. (v) Rma1H1 and Rma1 play a critical role in the downregulation of plasma membrane aquaporin levels. (c) Plant adaptations towards thermotolerance. (i) Increase in calcium ion (Ca2+) levels activates calmodulin (CaM), which regulates activity of CBK3 and that in turn promotes HSFA1a activity, HSP genes and HSPs. (ii) A sudden temperature increase activates PIPK and PLD, which leads to accumulation of PIP2 and PA. (iii) BhHsf1 may play dual roles in mediating heat stress tolerance and growth retardation. (v) BOB1, a noncanonical small HSP that is required for thermotolerance (vi) HsfA3 is induced by DREB2A, and regulates the expression of HSP-encoding genes. (d) Plant adaptations to tolerate salt. (i) Knockdown of OsRMC results in upregulation of OsDREB2A and Rab16A. (ii) The ABA-induced suppression of RBOHC, RBOHD and RD29A genes, while non-regulation of RD22 shows that itn1 mutation partially impairs ABA signalling pathways. (iii) GA2ox7 is induced by DDF1, which reduces endogenous GA, causes accumulation of DELLA proteins and represses growth for stress adaptation. (iv) Under salinity, oxidation of free apoplast polyamine levels is possibly the main source of ROS in the elongation zone of maize leaf blades. (v) The decreased abundance of enolase at the tonoplast results in a reduction in the ability of aldolase to stimulate vacuolar H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) activity, and reveals a role of glycolytic enzymes in salt tolerance. Red

668

Review matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, discriminating control and water-stressed wheat samples, were shown to be involved in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis [32]. These proteins have been proposed as putative biomarkers to define physiological effects at the molecular level and as targets for improving drought resistance in wheat. Furthermore, 2D-electrophoresis and Liquid chromatography– Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis identified the differential occurrence of a highly diverse range of proteins between well-watered and waterstressed maize plants [33]. Elevated temperature Plants regularly face elevated temperature throughout their multi-seasonal life cycle [17,59]. Elevated global temperature in the future will impact ecology and agriculture and may prove to be a major factor limiting crop production [24,59,60]. A plant’s ability to tolerate elevated temperatures, without prior conditioning, is referred to as basal thermotolerance, whereas a plant’s adaptive capacity to survive lethal high temperatures after preexposure to sub-lethal temperatures is known as acquired thermotolerance [4,60]. How plants cope with elevated temperatures is ultimately determined by both basal and acquired thermotolerance [4]. Elevated temperatures can induce a dramatic re-setting of physiological and molecular mechanisms in order to facilitate continued homeostasis and survival [4,25,59]. Of these different mechanisms, one involves transcriptional regulators, i.e. heat shock factors (HSFs) activating expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) [26,61,62]. HSPs are of particular importance in thermotolerance reactions and act as molecular chaperones to prevent denaturation or aggregation of target proteins as well as facilitating protein refolding [17,59,61]. Recent findings on plant adaptation to thermotolerance point not only to HSP-based mechanisms [17,21,42,59–61], but also to other components such as phospholipids, Pyrococcus furiosus superoxide SOR, DREB2A, GSNOR and RCA [4,24–26,63,64] (Tables 1, 2 and S1; Figure 1c). CBK3 is an important component of the Ca2+-regulated heatstress signal transduction pathway, downstream of calmodulin (CaM), that regulates expression of HSPs [61]. HsfA1a is believed to be an in vivo target of CBK3 and phosphorylation of HsfA1a by CBK3 influences HSPs and thermotolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings. ROF1 was shown to bind HSP90.1 and localise in the cytoplasm under normal conditions. Exposure to heat stress induces nuclear localisation of the ROF1–HSP90.1 complex in the presence of the transcription factor HsfA2 that interacts with HSP90.1 but not with ROF1 [21]. Moreover, in a study by Schramm, HsfA3 was demonstrated to be important for thermotolerance and transcriptionally controlled by DREB2A [26]. This, in turn, regulates the expression of HSP-encoding genes. Overexpression of BhHsf1 induced

Trends in Plant Science

Vol.15 No.12

growth retardation and thermotolerance in both Arabidopsis and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) [62]. BOBBER 1 (BOB1) is cytoplasmic at basal temperatures, forms heat-shock granules containing canonical small HSPs at high temperatures. This has been proposed to be necessary for thermotolerance [59]. sHSP transcripts were highly upregulated in response to high temperatures in rice [17]. In both skin and phelloderm of potato (Solanum tuberosum), exposure to 37 8C resulted in differentially regulated stress-related genes. Most of the genes upregulated in the phelloderm encoded HSPs [42]. In wheat, a total of 6560 probe sets displayed a twofold or higher change in expression following a heat treatment of 34 and/or 40 8C [60]. Overall, these studies have advanced our molecular understanding of complex HS responses mediated through HS signal transduction pathways, HS factors (HsfA1a, HsfA2, HsfA3 and BhHsf1) and HSPs in a wide range of species. In addition, recent results implicate the involvement of Ca2+ or CaM in the HS signal transduction pathway [61]. However, Meiri and Breiman showed ROF1 to play a role in the prolongation of thermotolerance by sustaining the levels of sHSPs necessary for survival at high temperatures [21]. BOB1, was demonstrated to be a sHSP with a developmental role at basal temperatures and a thermotolerance role at elevated temperatures [59]. Consequently, in future, studies with BOB1 should be aimed at identifying the targets of its chaperone activity and understanding how this unique sHSP regulates growth and development in plants. FtsH11 of Arabidopsis contributed to overall tolerance to high temperatures [4]. Following heat stress, Arabidopsis seedlings and also rice leaves showed dramatic increases in PIP2 and phosphatidic acid (PA), mediated by PIPK and PLD [25]. Within minutes of a sudden rise in temperature, plants deploy phospholipids to specific intracellular locations: PLD and a PIPK are activated, and PA and PIP2 rapidly accumulate. For this transduction of heat-initiated signal, required for PIP2 and PA accumulation, active cycling of a G protein appears necessary. This adaptation response is somewhat similar to that observed during drought stress where PLDa1 mediates ABA stomatal effects through interactions with PP2C and G protein [52]. RCA was identified as a major limiting factor in plant photosynthesis under moderately elevated temperatures and is thus a potential target for genetic manipulation to improve crop plant productivity under heat stress [24]. HOT5 which encodes GSNOR, is required for thermotolerance and uncovers a role of nitric oxide (NO) in thermotolerance and plant development [63]. GSNOR function is necessary for acclimation to high temperature and for normal plant growth. GSNOR regulates nitrosation levels by metabolising S-nitroglutathione (GSNO), which is a mobile reservoir of NO in plant cells. This finding emphasises the need to understand the mechanism that regulates GSNOR activity,

square symbolises activation/upregulation/induction/accumulation/elevated, green square symbolises knockdown/downregulation/suppression/reduced, and yellow square symbolises unaffected/not-impaired. This figure is based on the findings and models presented/proposed in [1,2,6,9,10,24–28,35,47,50–54,56,59,61,62,65,66,69]. For abbreviations, please refer to Table S1 in online supplementary material. We acknowledge the copyright permission given by the publisher of The Plant Journal (John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) to reproduce Figure 9 [61], Figure 8 [65], and Figure 6 [26].

669

Review considered as a critical aspect in analysing the overall regulation of NO-related signalling and nitrosative stress in plants [63]. Salinity High salinity is a critical environmental factor that inimically affects large areas of cultivated land. Plant growth, physiological and metabolic processes are affected, resulting in significant reductions in global crop productivity [27,65,66]. During salt stress, Na+ enters the cells and its over-accumulation induces ionic and osmotic stress in plants [66]. Salt accumulation can modify plant cell plasma membrane lipid and protein composition, cause ion imbalance and hyperosmotic stress and eventually disturb normal growth and development [23,67,68]. Plant molecular adaptations to salt stress involve, e.g. components of the salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway; salt and ABA induced accumulation of ROS; salt-inducible transcription factors; cytoskeleton, peroxisomes, apoplastic proteins and glycolytic enzymes [23,27,35,66–71]. Some significant advances are found in Tables 1 and S1, and Figure 1d. The SOS pathway regulates Na+/K+ ion homeostasis when plants are cultivated at high salt conditions and operates to maintain low cytoplasmic concentrations of sodium by sequestering Na+ in vacuoles. Autophosphorylation of Ser 228 of SOS2 is considered to be important for SOS2 functioning under salt stress [67]. Null mutations in the Arabidopsis genes PFD3 or PFD5, encoding PFD subunits, resulted in decreased overall levels of a- and b-tubulin, and eventually, alterations in microtubule structure [23]. The pfd3 and pfd5 mutants showed high sensitivity to high NaCl concentrations. Transient overexpression of DDF1 activated the promoter of GA2ox7 resulting in repressed growth and stress adaptation [65]. Furthermore, under in vivo salinity stress, peroxisomes were shown to be necessary for NO accumulation in the cytosol [70]. NO accumulation participates in the generation of peroxynitrite (ONOO ) and in enhancing protein tyrosine nitration, is a marker of nitrosative stress. ITN1 modulates salt tolerance by affecting ABA-mediated production of ROS [27]. High salinity stress markedly modified the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in broccoli (Brassica oleracea) [68]. It was suggested that this modification could influence membrane stability or the activity of plasma membrane proteins such as aquaporins or H+-ATPase, to provide a mechanism controlling water permeability and acclimation to salinity stress [68]. Moreover, under salinity, PAO activity was shown to provide ROS production in the apoplast, sustaining maize leaf elongation [69]. An apoplastic protein, OsRMC showed drastic abundance in response to salt stress, highlighting an important role for apoplastic proteins in salt tolerance [66]. Cell type-specific expression of HKT1;1 in the mature root stele of Arabidopsis showed an efficient means of decreasing shoot Na+ accumulation and increasing salinity tolerance [71]. Quantitative proteomics of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum plants showed membrane association of the glycolytic enzymes aldolase and enolase, along with subunits of the vacuolar H+-ATPase V-ATPase, revealing the importance of these enzymes in salt tolerance [35]. 670

Trends in Plant Science Vol.15 No.12

These recent and diverse investigations, through identification of molecular components of salt stress tolerance, widen our knowledge of the cellular mechanisms underlying plant adaptation. Characterisation of a novel Arabidopsis mutant itn1, has shown the possible roles of ITN1 in the ABA-mediated regulation of ROS levels under saltstress conditions [27]. However, more research is required to gain more information about this gene in salt-stress specific signal transduction. The dramatic abundance of apoplastic protein, OsRMC in response to salt stress, also highlights a significant role for these proteins in salt tolerance [66]. Recent results suggest that the cytoskeleton plays an essential role in Arabidopsis salt tolerance [23]. Further findings provide evidence on enolase as a multifunctional protein across species [35], implying that it may also play a regulatory or sensory role in multiple stresses at diverse cellular locations. The data on the necessity of peroxisomes for NO accumulation in the cytosol constitute a significant knowledge advancement regarding NO metabolism in plant peroxisomes and their involvement in abiotic stress responses [70]. Attempts to enhance salinity tolerance are currently being applied in cell type-specific manipulation of transport processes in commercially relevant plants such as rice and barley (Hordeum vulgare) [71]. Multiple stresses There have been few studies investigating plant responses to environmental stresses applied in combination. Such research is particularly important as, in nature, simultaneous abiotic stresses are commonplace. For example, heat stress is often accompanied by a water deficiency and drought by salinity. GRP7 is expressed abundantly in guard cells, and influences stomatal movement in accordance with the existing stress conditions [72]. In Arabidopsis, GRP7 affected growth and stress tolerance under high salt and dehydrating conditions. It also conferred freezing tolerance, particularly via the regulation of stomatal opening [72]. HOS3, which encodes an elongase-like protein, inhibited ABA-mediated stress responses implicating the very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) pathway as a control point for abiotic stress signalling and response [73]. These results provide further support for a role for ceramide in controlling stomatal behaviour. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing TaSnRK2.4 showed enhanced tolerance to drought, salt and freezing stresses, supported by decreased water loss, enhanced higher relative water content, greater cell membrane stability, improved photosynthetic potential and increased osmotic potential [74]. In rice, the overexpression of AP37 and AP59 increased tolerance to drought and high salinity [46] and overexpression of HvCBF4 resulted in increased tolerance to drought, high-salinity and low-temperature [7]. Expression of the CcHyPRP gene from pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in Arabidopsis conferred tolerance against drought, salinity and heat stress and thus may be considered as a candidate gene for enhanced abiotic stress tolerance in crops [75]. The lew1 mutant, after exposure to drought, exhibited increased expression of UPR pathway genes (BiP and biZIP60) and earlier expression of stress-responsive genes (RD29A, COR47) [22]. LEW1 is implicated to play a crucial role in UPR pathway and abiotic stress responses in

Review

Trends in Plant Science

Arabidopsis. Overexpression of soybean GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21 and GmWRKY54 genes conferred differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis plants [45]. OsABF1 enhanced abiotic-stress signalling in rice and is proposed to be a positive regulator of ABA-dependent abiotic signalling [76]. WLIP19 was shown to act as a transcriptional regulator of COR or LEA genes in the development of abiotic stress tolerance [77]. Pyrococcus furiosus SOR can be produced as a functional enzyme in planta and plants producing SOR have enhanced tolerance to heat, light and chemically induced ROS [64]. This finding supports reducing cytosolic ROS as a promising approach to improve stress tolerance in crop plants. The outcome from these comprehensive investigations on multiple stresses, where the molecular mechanisms imparting tolerance have been dissected revealing new roles for genes and proteins, can be a boon to strengthen future stress tolerance in crops. Our new knowledge about the functional roles of GRP7 in environmental stress responses [72], the involvement of HOS3 in abiotic stress signalling through the VLCFA pathway [73], conferring of multiple stress tolerance via TaSnRK2.4 [74] and uncovering of the role of WRKYtype transcription factors in abiotic stresses [45] are of particular relevance. Moreover, barley HvCBF4, which is induced by low-temperature stress, on overexpression in rice also resulted in tolerance to other abiotic stresses. This also suggests that barley CBF/DREBs act differently in transgenic rice than Arabidopsis CBF/DREBs [7]. Furthermore, characterisation of (bZIP) transcription factors; OsABF1 from rice [76] and WLIP19 from wheat [77] emphasise their significance in general abiotic stress responses. In Arabidopsis, many known stress-responsive genes, such as [(Figure_2)TD$IG] ERF/AP2, NCED3, ATHB-7, RD29B, PP2C and diverse

LEA genes, were strongly affected by individual stresses like salt, osmotic, ABA and temperature after 1–12 h [30]. Transcriptome datasets from msi1-cs plants (with highly reduced levels of MSI1) showed upregulation of a subset of ABA-responsive genes, which is an indicator for the response to drought and salt stress [54]. PUB22, PUB23, TsVP and DSM1 play a role in modulating drought stress responses but have also been reported to impart resistance to oxidative and other abiotic stresses [2,8,29], Moreover, DREB2A, detailed here in relation to drought and high temperature stress, is also known for its role in salt stress. Here, we have addressed some of the combined climatechange catastrophes that plants are facing and in the current decade, considerable progress has been made towards understanding molecular stress responses against different environmental stress factors. Different approaches, based on genetic and molecular studies have shown that a myriad of genes, proteins and metabolites, and their corresponding metabolic pathways or biological networks, modulate plant adaptation to environmental stresses. However, continued research is essential to show to what extent these adaptations are species and/or situation specific. Furthermore, the exact mechanisms involved and response and/or crosstalk relationships need further investigation. Considering the most vulnerable farmers are often confronted with multiple stress factors, there is a clear desire to identify potential, more generally – applicable ‘crop protectors’ which may confer broader plant protection to combined abiotic stresses. However, much work is still needed although recent results show great promise. Several genes have already been identified, which are linked to plant responses to more than one abiotic stress (Figure 2).

Elevated temperature CBK3 ROF1 HsfA3 DREB2A BhHsf1

BOB1 FtsH11 HOT5 PLD RCA

Vol.15 No.12

Salinity Multiple

DREB2A PUB22 PUB23 TsVP DSM1 GRP7

AP37 AP59 HOS3 HvCBF4 WLIP19 LEW1

GmWRKY13 GmWRKY21 GmWRKY54 OsABF1 CcHyPRP

SOS2 ITN1 PFD3 HKT1:1 PFD5 LOS2 DDF1 OsRMC GA2ox7 PAO

P. furiosus SOR TaSnRk2.4 NFYA5 OCP3 MYB96 FTA SAL1 MSI1

PLDα1 TOC1 DREB2A DRIP1 DRIP2 Rma1H1

PUB22 PUB23 DSM1 TsVP InsP3 BhHsf1

Drought TRENDS in Plant Science

Figure 2. Recent research continues to identify gene responses induced by more than one environmental stress. Such genes or gene networks provide potentially valuable starting points to develop broader crop protection strategies.

671

Review It may therefore indeed be possible to identify common protection denominators based on complementary genes or molecular networks which could, through targeted breeding or GM approaches, form the molecular basis for a more global crop-stress protection strategy and more robust varieties for high-risk environments. What are the future pathways to take? From this huge diversity of functional genomic studies relating to climate change catastrophes, much knowledge has been acquired on the modulation of regulatory networks and metabolic pathways associated with or determinant for plant stress responses. Nevertheless, applicable knowledge relevant to crop cultivation remains scarce. Faced with the challenge of sustainable global food security we ultimately require more generic solutions for crop protection. Systems biology approaches could prove beneficial and may finally generate models showing the contribution of different signalling pathways defining plant ‘-omic’ architectural responses in relation to climate change catastrophes. In order to achieve a holistic view of plant responses to climate change catastrophes, and to develop molecular engineering strategies to enhance plant tolerance to different stresses, it will be important to integrate ‘-omic’ data with bioinformatics based systems-biology/systems-level modelling and to develop computational models. Some recent breakthroughs represent a promising start but are not yet the accomplishments we require [16,78–90]. Through a systems biology analysis, the photosynthetic metabolism of C3 plants has been shown to be under highly cooperative regulation in changing environments, and systems-level modelling has been reviewed as a timely method to explore options for enhanced photosynthesis in the context of global climate change [83]. By performing bioinformatics analysis of Arabidopsis microarray data, a novel regulatory program was proposed [79]. This program combines transcriptional and post-translational controls and participates in modulating fluxes of amino acid metabolism in response to abiotic stresses. Simulations of stomatal response through a guard cell ABA-signalling model provided an efficient tool for the identification of candidate manipulations [88]. This may offer the best possibility of conferring increased drought stress tolerance and prioritising future wet-bench analyses. Weston et al. showed that a compendium of genomic signatures can be used to classify the plant abiotic stress phenotype in Arabidopsis according to transcriptome architecture, and then be linked to gene coexpression network analysis to determine the underlying genes governing the phenotypic response [90]. By applying this approach, the existence of known stress responsive pathways and marker genes was confirmed, and a common abiotic stress responsive transcriptome and related phenotypic classification to stress duration was presented. Furthermore, to dissect the transcriptional control of Arabidopsis, Carrera et al. presented a network analysis of genome-wide expression data combined with reverse-engineering network modelling [89]. The results suggested that Arabidopsis has evolved a high connectivity in terms of transcriptional regulation among cellular functions involved in responses and adaptation to changing environments, while gene networks constitutive672

Trends in Plant Science Vol.15 No.12

ly expressed or less related to stress responses are characterised by a lower connectivity. A computational model AraNet (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/ 100131142436.htm#) was recently presented as a source for predicting gene function of uncharacterised plant genes with unprecedented speed and accuracy [78]. For example, by using AraNet (http://www.functionalnet.org/aranet/), At1g80710 (now DROUGHT SENSITIVE 1; DRS1) has been identified as a regulator of drought sensitivity [84]. In today’s ‘-omics’ era, which is already moving towards a more systems biology type approach, we have come some way to answering and modelling some of the plant stress responses. However, future directions for research seem to be more challenging because our global climate is changing unpredictably. We are still far behind establishing a comprehensive predictive model, in which we are just one click away from seeing the diverse biological networks in plant responses to combined climate change catastrophes. Such a model would be highly useful and could be exploited to help us improve and strengthen plant fitness to changing climates. Eventually this could bring us closer to a sustainable agriculture with food, fibre, oil, fuel and other crop plants that are more adaptable to changing climates. Disclosure Statement The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgements This article has been generated through a travel fund from FUGE MidNorway, 2009 and joint collaboration between NTNU, Norway and PRI, Wageningen. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Norwegian Research Council (RCN), grants 185173 (Plant innate immunity) and 184146 (A systems biology approach for modelling of host defence). We are thankful to Ralph Kissen for critical reading of the article and providing constructive comments. RDH and RdV acknowledge financial support from the Netherlands Genomic Initiative. We apologise to authors whose work could not be cited here because of space constraints. We acknowledge copyright permissions given by the publishers of the Journals: Science (The American Association for the Advancement of Science), The Plant Cell, Plant Physiology (both American Society of Plant Biologists, USA) and Molecular Plant (Oxford University Press) to reproduce Figures (Figure 9 [10], Figure 8 [56], Figure 8 [1], and Figure 5 Wang et al. 2009, 2 (1) [53]) for Figure 1.

Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010. 08.002. References 1 Seo, P.J. et al. (2009) The MYB96 transcription factor mediates abscisic acid signaling during drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 151, 275–289 2 Cho, S.K. et al. (2008) Arabidopsis PUB22 and PUB23 are homologous U-Box E3 ubiquitin ligases that play combinatory roles in response to drought stress. Plant Cell 20, 1899–1914 3 Burkart, S. et al. (2009) Canopy CO2 exchange of sugar beet under different CO2 concentrations and nitrogen supply: results from a freeair CO2 enrichment study. Plant Biol. 11, 109–123 4 Chen, J. et al. (2006) FtsH11 protease plays a critical role in Arabidopsis thermotolerance. Plant J. 48, 73–84 5 Jin, C.W. et al. (2009) Elevated carbon dioxide improves plant iron nutrition through enhancing the iron-deficiency-induced responses under iron-limited conditions in tomato. Plant Physiol. 150, 272–280 6 Ramı´rez, V. et al. (2009) Drought tolerance in Arabidopsis is controlled by the OCP3 disease resistance regulator. Plant J. 58, 578–591

Review 7 Oh, S-J. et al. (2007) Expression of barley HvCBF4 enhances tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5, 646–656 8 Li, B. et al. (2008) Heterologous expression of the TsVPi gene improves the drought resistance of maize. Plant Biotechnol. J. 6, 146–159 9 Lee, H.K. et al. (2009) Drought stress-induced Rma1H1, a RING membrane-anchor E3 ubiquitin ligase homolog, regulates aquaporin levels via ubiquitination in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell 21, 622–641 10 Sakuma, Y. et al. (2006) Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in drought-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 18, 1292–1309 11 Winning, H. et al. (2009) Exploring abiotic stress on asynchronous protein metabolism in single kernels of wheat studied by NMR spectroscopy and chemometrics. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 291–300 12 Meehl, G.A. et al. (2007) Global Climate Projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Solomon, S. et al., eds), pp. 749–845, Cambridge University Press 13 Legnaioli, T. et al. (2009) TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO J. 28, 3745–3757 14 Chae, L. et al. (2009) Diverse transcriptional programs associated with environmental stress and hormones in the Arabidopsis receptorlike kinase gene family. Mol. Plant 2, 84–107 15 Fernandes, J. et al. (2008) Distinctive transcriptome responses to adverse environmental conditions in Zea mays L. Plant Biotechnol. J. 6, 782–798 16 Shulaev, V. et al. (2008) Metabolomics for plant stress response. Physiol. Plant. 132, 199–208 17 Sarkar, N. et al. (2009) Rice sHsp genes: genomic organization and expression profiling under stress and development. BMC Genomics 10, 393 18 Springer, C.J. et al. (2008) Elevated CO2 influences the expression of floral-initiation genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 178, 63–67 19 Li, P. et al. (2008) Arabidopsis transcript and metabolite profiles: ecotype-specific responses to open-air elevated [CO2]. Plant Cell Environ. 31, 1673–1687 20 Bokhari, S.A. et al. (2007) Proteomic response of rice seedling leaves to elevated CO2 levels. J. Proteome Res. 6, 4624–4633 21 Meiri, D. and Breiman, A. (2009) Arabidopsis ROF1 (FKBP62) modulates thermotolerance by interacting with HSP90.1 and affecting the accumulation of HsfA2-regulated sHSPs. Plant J. 59, 387–399 22 Zhang, H. et al. (2008) Dolichol biosynthesis and its effects on the unfolded protein response and abiotic stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 1879–1898 23 Rodriguez-Milla, M.A. and Salinas, J. (2009) Prefoldins 3 and 5 play an essential role in Arabidopsis tolerance to salt stress. Mol. Plant 2, 526–534 24 Kurek, I. et al. (2007) Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. Plant Cell 19, 3230–3241 25 Mishkind, M. et al. (2009) Heat stress activates phospholipase D and triggers PIP2 accumulation at the plasma membrane and nucleus. Plant J. 60, 10–21 26 Schramm, F. et al. (2008) A cascade of transcription factor DREB2A and heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 regulates the heat stress response of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 53, 264–274 27 Sakamoto, H. et al. (2008) ITN1, a novel gene encoding an ankyrinrepeat protein that affects the ABA-mediated production of reactive oxygen species and is involved in salt-stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 411–422 28 Hong, Y. et al. (2008) Dual functions of phospholipase D{alpha}1 in plant response to drought. Mol. Plant 1, 262–269 29 Ning, J. et al. (2010) A Raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 152, 876–890 30 Zeller, G. et al. (2009) Stress-induced changes in the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome analyzed using whole-genome tiling arrays. Plant J. 58, 1068–1082 31 Cseke, L.J. et al. (2009) Transcriptomic comparison in the leaves of two aspen genotypes having similar carbon assimilation rates but

Trends in Plant Science

32

33 34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42 43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54 55

Vol.15 No.12

different partitioning patterns under elevated [CO2]. New Phytol. 182, 891–911 Caruso, G. et al. (2009) Analysis of drought responsive proteins in wheat (Triticum durum) by 2D-PAGE and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Plant Sci. 177, 570–576 Alvarez, S. et al. (2008) Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 31, 325–340 Zobayed, S.M.A. et al. (2005) Temperature stress can alter the photosynthetic efficiency and secondary metabolite concentrations in St. John’s wort. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43, 977–984 Barkla, B.J. et al. (2009) Quantitative proteomics of the tonoplast reveals a role for glycolytic enzymes in salt tolerance. Plant Cell 21, 4044–4058 Ainsworth, E.A. et al. (2007) Does elevated atmospheric [CO2] alter diurnal C uptake and the balance of C and N metabolites in growing and fully expanded soybean leaves? J. Exp. Bot. 58, 579–591 Davey, M.P. et al. (2004) Effects of elevated CO2 on the vasculature and phenolic secondary metabolism of Plantago maritima. Phytochemistry 65, 2197–2204 Urano, K. et al. (2009) Characterization of the ABA-regulated global responses to dehydration in Arabidopsis by metabolomics. Plant J. 57, 1065–1078 Charlton, A. et al. (2008) Responses of the pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaf metabolome to drought stress assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Metabolomics 4, 312–327 Degenkolbe, T. et al. (2009) Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 69, 133–153 Watkinson, J.I. et al. (2008) Tuber development phenotypes in adapted and acclimated, drought-stressed Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena have distinct expression profiles of genes associated with carbon metabolism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 46, 34–45 Ginzberg, I. et al. (2009) Transcriptomic profiling of heat-stress response in potato periderm. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 4411–4421 Oh, M-M. et al. (2009) Environmental stresses induce healthpromoting phytochemicals in lettuce. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 47, 578–583 Gupta, P. et al. (2005) Gene expression patterns of trembling aspen trees following long-term exposure to interacting elevated CO2 and tropospheric O3. New Phytol. 167, 129–142 Zhou, Q-Y. et al. (2008) Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes,GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 6, 486–503 Oh, S-J. et al. (2009) Overexpression of the transcription factor AP37 in rice improves grain yield under drought conditions. Plant Physiol. 150, 1368–1379 Li, W-X. et al. (2008) The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. Plant Cell 20, 2238–2251 Carmo-Silva, A.E. et al. (2009) Drought stress increases the production of 5-hydroxynorvaline in two C4 grasses. Phytochemistry 70, 664–671 Rampino, P. et al. (2006) Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 2143–2152 Wilson, P.B. et al. (2009) The nucleotidase/phosphatase SAL1 is a negative regulator of drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 58, 299–317 Perera, I.Y. et al. (2008) Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the type 1 inositol 5-phosphatase exhibit increased drought tolerance and altered abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 20, 2876–2893 Mishra, G. et al. (2006) A bifurcating pathway directs abscisic acid effects on stomatal closure and opening in Arabidopsis. Science 312, 264–266 Wang, Y. et al. (2009) Shoot-specific down-regulation of protein farnesyltransferase ({alpha}-subunit) for yield protection against drought in Canola. Mol. Plant 2, 191–200 Alexandre, C. et al. (2009) Arabidopsis MSI1 is required for negative regulation of the response to drought stress. Mol. Plant 2, 675–687 Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. and Shinozaki, K. (2005) Organization of cis-acting regulatory elements in osmotic- and cold-stress-responsive promoters. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 88–94

673

Review 56 Qin, F. et al. (2008) Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 20, 1693–1707 57 Naya, L. et al. (2007) The response of carbon metabolism and antioxidant defenses of alfalfa nodules to drought stress and to the subsequent recovery of plants. Plant Physiol. 144, 1104–1114 58 Fortunati, A. et al. (2008) Isoprene emission is not temperaturedependent during and after severe drought-stress: a physiological and biochemical analysis. Plant J. 55, 687–697 59 Perez, D.E. et al. (2009) BOBBER1 is a noncanonical Arabidopsis small heat shock protein required for both development and thermotolerance. Plant Physiol. 151, 241–252 60 Qin, D. et al. (2008) Heat stress-responsive transcriptome analysis in heat susceptible and tolerant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by using Wheat Genome Array. BMC Genomics 9, 432 61 Liu, H-T. et al. (2008) The calmodulin-binding protein kinase 3 is part of heat-shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 55, 760–773 62 Zhu, Y. et al. (2009) Ectopic over-expression of BhHsf1, a heat shock factor from the resurrection plant Boea hygrometrica, leads to increased thermotolerance and retarded growth in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 71, 451–467 63 Lee, U. et al. (2008) Modulation of nitrosative stress by Snitrosoglutathione reductase is critical for thermotolerance and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 786–802 64 Im, Y.J. et al. (2009) Expression of Pyrococcus furiosus superoxide reductase in Arabidopsis enhances heat tolerance. Plant Physiol. 151, 893–904 65 Magome, H. et al. (2008) The DDF1 transcriptional activator upregulates expression of a gibberellin-deactivating gene, GA2ox7, under high-salinity stress in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 56, 613–626 66 Zhang, L. et al. (2009) Identification of an apoplastic protein involved in the initial phase of salt stress response in rice root by twodimensional electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. 149, 916–928 67 Fujii, H. and Zhu, J-K. (2009) An autophosphorylation site of the protein kinase SOS2 is important for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2, 183–190 68 Lo´pez-Pe´rez, L. et al. (2009) Changes in plasma membrane lipids, aquaporins and proton pump of broccoli roots, as an adaptation mechanism to salinity. Phytochemistry 70, 492–500 69 Rodriguez, A.A. et al. (2009) Polyamine oxidase activity contributes to sustain maize leaf elongation under saline stress. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 4249–4262 70 Corpas, F.J. et al. (2009) Peroxisomes are required for in vivo nitric oxide accumulation in the cytosol following salinity stress of Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 151, 2083–2094 71 Møller, I.S. et al. (2009) Shoot Na+ exclusion and increased salinity tolerance engineered by cell type-specific alteration of Na+ transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2163–2178 72 Kim, J.S. et al. (2008) Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein7 affects abiotic stress responses by regulating stomata opening and closing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 55, 455–466 73 Quist, T.M. et al. (2009) HOS3, an ELO-like gene, inhibits effects of ABA and implicates a S-1-P/Ceramide control system for abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2, 138–151 74 Mao, X. et al. (2010) TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 683–696 75 Priyanka, B. et al. (2010) Expression of pigeonpea hybrid-proline-rich protein encoding gene (CcHyPRP) in yeast and Arabidopsis affords multiple abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8, 76–87 76 Amir Hossain, M. et al. (2010) The bZIP transcription factor OsABF1 is an ABA responsive element binding factor that enhances abiotic stress signaling in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 72, 557–566 77 Kobayashi, F. et al. (2008) Development of abiotic stress tolerance via bZIP-type transcription factor LIP19 in common wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 891–905

674

Trends in Plant Science Vol.15 No.12 78 Carnegie, I. (2010) Gene function discovery: New computation model predicts gene function. ScienceDaily (February 1, 2010), retrieved July 20, 2010 from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/ 100131142436.htm 79 Less, H. and Galili, G. (2008) Principal transcriptional programs regulating plant amino acid metabolism in response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 147, 316–330 80 Fukushima, A. et al. (2009) Integrated omics approaches in plant systems biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 532–538 81 Dutta, B. et al. (2009) Time-series integrated omic analyses to elucidate short-term stress-induced responses in plant liquid cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102, 264–279 82 Kanehisa, M. et al. (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucl. Acids Res. 36, D480–484 83 Luo, R. et al. (2009) Photosynthetic metabolism of C3 plants shows highly cooperative regulation under changing environments: A systems biological analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 847–852 84 Lee, I. et al. (2010) Rational association of genes with traits using a genome-scale gene network for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Biotech. 28, 149–156 85 Pitzschke, A. and Hirt, H. (2010) Bioinformatic and systems biology tools to generate testable models of signaling pathways and their targets. Plant Physiol. 152, 460–469 86 Joung, J-G. et al. (2009) Plant MetGenMAP: An integrative analysis system for plant systems biology. Plant Physiol. 151, 1758–1768 87 Yuan, J.S. et al. (2008) Plant systems biology comes of age. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 165–171 88 Li, S. et al. (2006) Predicting essential components of signal transduction networks: A dynamic model of guard cell abscisic acid signaling. PLoS Biol. 4, e312 89 Carrera, J. et al. (2009) Reverse-engineering the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptional network under changing environmental conditions. Genome Biol. 10, R96 90 Weston, D. et al. (2008) Connecting genes, coexpression modules, and molecular signatures to environmental stress phenotypes in plants. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 16 91 Poole, R.L. (2007) The TAIR Database. Methods Mol. Biol. 406, 179–212 92 Hummel, I. et al. (2010) Arabidopsis thaliana plants acclimate to water deficit at low cost through changes of C usage; an integrated perspective using growth, metabolite, enzyme and gene expression analysis. Plant Physiol., pp.110.157008 93 Parida, A. et al. (2007) Alterations in photosynthetic pigments, protein and osmotic components in cotton genotypes subjected to short-term drought stress followed by recovery. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 1, 37–48 94 Rivero, R.M. et al. (2009) Cytokinin-dependent photorespiration and the protection of photosynthesis during water deficit. Plant Physiol. 150, 1530–1540 95 Qaderi, M.M. et al. (2006) Growth and physiological responses of canola (Brassica napus) to three components of global climate change: temperature, carbon dioxide and drought. Physiol. Plant. 128, 710–721 96 Himanen, S. et al. (2008) Constitutive and herbivore-inducible glucosinolate concentrations in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) leaves are not affected by Bt Cry1Ac insertion but change under elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3. Planta 227, 427–437 97 Gleadow, R.M. et al. (2009) Growth and nutritive value of cassava (Manihot esculenta Cranz.) are reduced when grown in elevated CO2. Plant Biol. 11, 76–82 98 Souza, A.P.D. et al. (2008) Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis, biomass and productivity, and modifies gene expression in sugarcane. Plant Cell Environ. 31, 1116–1127 99 Kosma, D.K. et al. (2009) The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 151, 1918–1929 100 Ainsworth, E.A. and Rogers, A. (2007) The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270

Supplementary Material

Plant molecular stress responses face climate change Ishita Ahuja1, 2, Ric C. H. de Vos2, 3, Atle M. Bones1 and Robert D. Hall2, 3, 4 1

Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Realfagbygget, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway 2 Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands 3 Centre for BioSystems Genomics, P.O. Box 98, 6700AB Wageningen, The Netherlands. 4 Netherlands Metabolomics Centre, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands

Corresponding author: Hall, R.D. ([email protected])

Table S1. Abbreviations and description of the genes, proteins and enzymes involved in different environmental stress factors (ESFs) Gene/Protein/ Enzyme

Plant

ESFs

Description and molecular mechanisms (known/putative)

Refs

ABAR

Drought

At1g80160

Arabidopsis

Drought

At3g53990 At3g55940 At4g36010 ABI1 ATHB-7

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

Drought Drought Drought Drought Multiple

BhHsf1 (Figure 1, c3)

Boea hygrometrica

Elevated temperature

BiP

Arabidopsis

Drought

BOB1(Figure 1, c5)

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature

Abscisic acid (ABA)-related gene / ABA-binding protein; encodes magnesium chelatase that is involved in plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction Genes represents subgroups I and II of transcription factors with an APETELA2 (AP2) domain Putative Galactinol synthase (GolS3) Putative AP2 domain-containing DNA binding protein, Dehydrin xero2 (XERO2) / low temperature–induced protein (LTI30) Late embryogenesis-abundant protein, putative Galactinol synthase, putative (GolS2) Proton-dependent oligopeptide transport (POT) family protein / Nitrate transporter 1.7 Encodes a lactoylglutathione lyase family protein / glyoxalase I family protein Universal stress protein (USP) family protein Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C, putative Pathogenesis-related thaumatin family protein ABA insensitive 1 A. thaliana homeobox 7; encodes a putative transcription factor that contains a homeodomain closely linked to a leucine zipper motif, regulates in an ABA-dependent manner and may act in a signal transduction pathway which mediates a drought response An Hsf from the resurrection plant B. hygrometrica; may play dual roles in mediating heat tolerance and growth retardation via regulation of target genes related to stress response and mitotic cell cycle Binding protein; chaperone protein, play crucial roles in assisting protein folding during endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which can result from N-glycosylation defects BOBBER1; A NudC domain containing Arabidopsis small heat shock protein; required for the normal partitioning and patterning of the apical domain of the Arabidopsis embryo, first time evidenced to have both developmental and thermotolerance functions, and may play a role in

[S1–S2]

At1g09350 At1g22985 At3g50970 At1g52690 At1g56600 At1g69870

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Rice (Oryza sativa) Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

AP37 and AP59

Multiple Drought Drought Drought Drought Drought Drought

[S3] [S4] [S5] [S4] [S5] [S4] [S2,S5] [S6] [S5] [S4] [S4] [S2,S7] [S2,S8]

[S9]

[S10]

[S11]

1

bZIP60

Arabidopsis

Drought

CBK3 (Figure 1, c1)

Arabidopsis

CcHyPRP

Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)

Elevated temperature Multiple

COR

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

Multiple

Arabidopsis

Salinity

Wheat (Triticum durum) Arabidopsis

Drought

DRIP1 and DRIP2 (Figure 1, b3) DSM1

Arabidopsis

Drought

Rice

Drought

ERF

Arabidopsis

Multiple

FLC FTA (Figure 1, a4)

Arabidopsis Canola (Brassica napus)

Elevated CO2 Drought

FtsH11

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature

GA2ox7 (Figure 1, d3) GH3 (Figure 1, a6) GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21 and GmWRKY54 G protein (Figure 1, a3)

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Soybean (Glycine max)

Salinity Drought Multiple

Arabidopsis

GRP7

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature and Drought Multiple

GSNOR

Arabidopsis

HKT1;1

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature Salinity

HOS3

Arabidopsis

Multiple

HOT5

Arabidopsis

HPR1

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature Drought

HSFA1a (Figure 1, c1)

Arabidopsis

HsfA3 (Figure 1, c6)

Arabidopsis

COR47 DDF1 (Figure 1, d3)

DELLA proteins (Figure 1, d3) DHN genes DREB2A (Figure 1, b1,2,3; c6)

Drought Salinity

Drought

Elevated temperature Elevated

both of these folding networks Basic domain/leucine zipper60; shown to activate BiP expression, probably through ER stress response element–like sequences Calmodulin-binding protein kinase 3; controls the binding activity of HSFs to HSEs by phosphorylation of AtHSFA1 A hybrid-proline-rich protein encoding gene; contains a repetitive proline-rich (PR) N-terminal domain and a conserved eight cysteine motif (8CM) at the C-terminus, shows multiple abiotic stress tolerance at cellular and whole plant levels Cold regulated gene

[S10] [S12] [S13]

[S14]

Cold-regulated 47; belongs to the dehydrin protein family Dwarf and delayed flowering 1; salinity-responsive gene encoding an AP2 transcription factor of the DREB1/CBF subfamily, causes dwarfism mainly by levels of reducing bioactive gibberellic acid (GA) in transgenic Arabidopsis Play a pivotal role in the negative regulation of GA signalling, probably as transcriptional regulators Dehydrin genes belong to family of LEA proteins

[S2,S10] [S15]

Dehydration-responsive element binding protein 2; encodes a transcription factor that specifically binds to DRE/CRT cis elements (responsive to drought and low-temperature stress) Encode DREB2A-interacting protein 1 and 2; C3HC4 RING domain– containing proteins that interact with the DREB2A protein in the nucleus A putative mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase kinase (MAPKKK); functions as an early signalling component in regulating responses to drought stress by regulating scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in rice Encodes a member of the DREB subfamily A-4 of ethylene response factor Flowering locus C; floral suppressor gene α-subunit of farnesyltransferase; involved in protein prenylation, regulates in response to ABA and drought, conditional and specific down-regulation of FTA in canola using the AtHPR1 promoter driving an RNAi construct resulted in yield protection against drought stress FtsH protease 11; Filamentous temperature sensitive H (FtsH) encodes a membrane-bound, ATP-dependent metalloprotease involved in regulation of the heat-shock transcription factor σ32. GA 2-oxidase 7; encodes a C20-GA deactivation enzyme Encode auxin-conjugating enzymes Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes; play differential roles in abiotic stress tolerance

[S2,S5]

[S15] [S16]

[S2,S17] [S18]

[S2,S8] [S19] [S20]

[S21]

[S15] [S21] [S22]

A heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein

[S7,S23]

Glycine-rich protein 7; seems to promote stomatal opening and reduce tolerance under salt and dehydration stress conditions, but promotes stomatal closing and thereby increases stress tolerance under conditions of cold tolerance S-nitrosoglutathione reductase, which metabolizes the Nitric oxide (NO) adduct S-nitrosoglutathione High affinity potassium transporter1; a plasma membrane protein expressed in the root stele, mediates salinity tolerance Hyper-osmotically sensitive gene with high homology to CIG30 (ELO2); controls very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) composition and functions to inhibit ABA-mediated stress responses, including regulation of stomatal aperture. CIG30 has been implicated in synthesis of VLCFA, which are essential precursors for sphingolipids and ceramides. Sensitive to hot temperatures; encodes S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) Hydroxypyruvate reductase; since the promoter region contains the core motif of DREB2A, the expression is drought inducible Class A Heat Shock Factor 1A

[S2,S24]

[S2,S12]

Heat Shock Transcription Factor A3; HsfA3 is transcriptionally induced

[S2,S28]

2

[S25] [S26] [S27]

[S25] [S20]

temperature HvCBF4

Barley (Hordeum vulgare)

Multiple

InsP5-ptase (Figure 1, b2)

Arabidopsis

Drought

ISPS

Black poplar (Populus nigra)

Drought

ITN1 (Figure 1, d2)

Arabidopsis

Salinity

LEA

Wheat, Arabidopsis

Drought, Multiple

LEW1

Arabidopsis

Multiple

LOS2 (Figure 1, d5) LTP3 and LTP4

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

Salinity Drought

miR169 (Figure 1, a1) MSI1 (Figure 1, a8)

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

Drought Drought

MT2A MYB96 (Figure 1, a6)

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

Drought Drought

NCED3

Arabidopsis

Multiple

NFYA5 (Figure 1, a1)

Arabidopsis

Drought

OCP3 (Figure 1, a7)

Arabidopsis

Drought

OsABF1

Rice

Multiple

OsDREB2A (Figure 1, d1)

Rice

Salinity

OsRMC (Figure 1, d1)

Rice

Salinity

PAO PFD3 and PFD5

Maize (Zea mays) Arabidopsis

Salinity Salinity

PIP2 (Figure 1, c2)

Arabidopsis

PIPK (Figure 1, c2)

Arabidopsis

PLD (Figure 1, c2)

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature Elevated temperature Elevated

during heat stress by DREB2A, and HsfA3 in turn regulates the expression of Hsp-encoding genes Hordeum vulgare C-repeat binding factor 4; a barley orthologue of CBF/DREB, expression is induced by low temperature stress, CBF/DREBs of barley are suggested to act differently from those of Arabidopsis in transgenic rice over-expressing HvCBF4 Inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase; specifically hydrolyzes soluble inositol phosphates and terminates the signal, drought tolerance of the InsP5-ptase plants is mediated in part via a DREB2A-dependent pathway Isoprene synthase; catalyzes the synthesis of isoprene from dimethylallyl diphosphate in planta, isoprene (most abundant volatile organic compound) is considered to be an important molecule for ameliorating abiotic stresses Increased tolerance to NaCl1; encodes a transmembrane protein with an ankyrin-repeat motif that has been implicated in diverse cellular processes such as signal transduction Late embryogenesis abundant proteins; accumulate under stress conditions such as drought, salinity and low temperatures, but they are present also in ABA-treated vegetative plants Leaf Wilting 1; encodes a cis-prenyltransferase, catalyzes dolichol biosynthesis, which is important for plant responses to drought. Dolichols are long-chain unsaturated polyisoprenoids with multiple cellular functions, such as serving as lipid carriers of sugars used for protein glycosylation, which affects protein trafficking in the endoplasmic reticulum. Low expression of osmotically responsive genes 1 Lipid transfer protein 3 and Lipid transfer protein 4; LTP4 is strongly upregulated by ABA MicroRNA 169A; targets mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression A subunit of polycomb group protein complexes and chromatin assembly factor 1; can bind to the chromatin of the drought-inducible downstream target RD20, plays role in the negative regulation of the drought stress response Metallothionein protein, putative A R2R3-type MYB transcription factor; a molecular link mediating ABAauxin cross talk in drought stress response and lateral root growth, providing an adaptive strategy under drought stress conditions Nine-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3; a key enzyme of ABA biosynthesis, regulates in response to drought and salinity Nuclear factor Y A5; encodes a member of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor (CBF-B/NF-YA) family and contains a target site for miR169, up-regulated in response to ABA and drought A transcriptional regulator from the homeodomain (HD) family; proposed to have a regulatory role in the adaptive responses to drought tolerance and disease resistance to fungal pathogens, functioning as a modulator of independent and specific aspects of the ABA- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-mediated signal transduction pathways Oryza sativa ABA responsive element binding factor 1gene; encodes a bZIP transcription factor, expression in seedling shoots and roots was found to be induced by anoxia, salinity, drought, oxidative stress, cold and ABA Encode Oryza sativa Dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 2A Oryza sativa root meander curling; an apoplastic protein, with extracellular domain-like cysteine-rich motifs (DUF26) Polyamine oxidase Prefoldins 3 and 5; encode proteins orthologous to prefoldin (PFD) subunits 3 and 5 from yeast and mammals, involved in unfolded protein binding. Disruption of PFD3 and PFD5 provokes a hypersensitivity of Arabidopsis to elevated concentrations of NaCl that correlates with very low levels of α- and β-tubulin. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate

[S29]

[S4]

[S30]

[S31]

[S8,S14,S16]

[S10]

[S2,S32] [S2,S6] [S33] [S2,S6]

[S5] [S21]

[S2,S8] [S2,S33]

[S34]

[S35]

[S36] [S36] [S37] [S38]

[S23]

Phosphatidylinositolphosphate kinase

[S23]

Phospholipase D

[S23]

3

temperature Drought

PLDα1 (Figure 1, a 2; a3)

POX22.3, POX8.1 PP2C (Figure 1, a3)

Rice Arabidopsis

PUB22 and PUB23 (Figure 1, b4)

Arabidopsis

Drought Drought, Multiple Drought

Rab16A (Figure 1, d1) RBOHC and RBOHD (Figure 1, d2) RCA

Rice Arabidopsis

Salinity Salinity

Arabidopsis

RCA1 (Figure 1, c4)

Arabidopsis

RD20

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature Elevated temperature Drought

RD22 (Figure 1, a6; d2) RD29A and RD29B (Figure 1, d2)

Arabidopsis Arabidopsis

Salinity Drought, Multiple

Rma1H1 (Figure 1, b5)

Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Arabidopsis

Drought

ROF1

Arabidopsis

Elevated temperature

RPN12a (Figure 1, b4)

Arabidopsis

Drought

SAL1 (Figure 1, a5)

Arabidopsis

Drought

Ser 228 SODs

Arabidopsis Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Archaeal hyperthermophile (Pyrococcus furiosus) Arabidopsis

Salinity Drought

SOR

SOS2

[S39]

[S18] [S2,S8]

Plant U-Box 22 and 23, encodes cytoplasmically localized U-box domain E3 ubiquitin ligases proteins that are involved in the response to water stress and acts as a negative regulator of PAMP-triggered immunity Rice salt responsive gene; belongs to the group 2 LEA gene family Respiratory burst oxidase homolog C and Respiratory burst oxidase homolog D; encode the ROS-producing NADPH oxidases Rubisco activase

[S2,S40]

[S36] [S2,S31] [S41]

43-kD b (short isoform) of RCA

[S41]

Responsive to desiccation 20; encodes a calcium binding protein whose mRNA is induced upon treatment with NaCl, ABA and in response to desiccation Responsive to desiccation 22 Responsive to desiccation 29A/Cold regulated 78 (COR78) and Responsive to desiccation 29B; RD29B is induced in expression in response to water deprivation such as cold, high-salt, and desiccation, response appears to be via ABA A hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) homolog of a human RING membrane-anchor 1 E3 ubiquitin ligase; play a critical role in the downregulation of plasma membrane aquaporin levels by inhibiting aquaporin trafficking to the plasma membrane and subsequent proteasomal degradation as a response to dehydration in transgenic Arabidopsis plants Rotmase FKBP 1; A peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerase and a member of the FKBP (FK506 binding protein) family; exposure to heat stress induces nuclear localization of the ROF1–HSP90.1 complex, which is dependent upon the presence of the transcription factor HsfA2, which interacts with HSP90.1 but not with ROF1 Regulatory particle non-ATPase 12a; encoding a non-ATPase subunit of the 26S proteasome complex, together with other non-ATPase subunits forms the lid sub- complex, which functions in substrate recognitioin and processing before Ub-tagged proteins enter into the core particle Encodes a bifunctional protein that has 3'(2'),5'-bisphosphate nucleotidase and inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase activities with alx8 (altered expression of APX2) mutation. alx8 mutant has constitutively increased ABA content, higher expression of genes responsive to high light stress and is reported to be drought tolerant. An autophosphorylation site of the protein kinase SOS2 Superoxide dismutases

[S2,S6]

[S45] [S46]

Elevated temperature

Superoxide reductase

[S47]

Salinity

Salt Overly Sensitive 2; essential for salt-stress signalling and tolerance in Arabidopsis and is known to be activated by calcium-SOS3 and by phosphorylation at its activation loop An SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.); confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis, could be utilized in transgenic breeding to improve abiotic stresses in crops Triticum durum dehydrins, belong to DHN gene family, were named on the basis of their identity with known DHN sequences and putative molecular weight Timing of CAB expression 1; a key clock component binds to the promoter of the ABAR and controls its circadian expression Encodes V-H+-PPase from a dicotyledonous halophyte Thellungiella halophila with a maize ubiquitin promoter

[S45]

TaSnRK2.4

Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Multiple

TdDHN15.2, TdDHN15.1, TdDHN13, TdDHN15.3 and TdDHN9.6 TOC1

Wheat (Triticum durum)

Drought

Arabidopsis

Drought

Dicotyledonous halophyte

Drought

TsVP

Encodes Phospholipase Dα1(one of 12 enzymes that have been identified in Arabidopsis); shown to mediate the ABA regulation of stomatal movements Peroxidase genes Protein phosphatase 2C

[S31] [S2,S8,S10]

[S2,S42]

[S2,S43]

[S2,S40]

[S2,S44]

[S48]

[S16]

[S1] [S49]

4

+

V-H -PPase

V-ATPase WLIP19

(Thellungiella halophila) Dicotyledonous halophyte (Thellungiella halophila) Arabidopsis Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Drought

Vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase

[S49]

Elevated temperature Multiple

Vacuolar H+-ATPase

[S32]

Wheat LIP (low-temperature induced protein) 19

[S14]

Supplementary references

S1 Legnaioli, T., et al. (2009) TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO J 28, 37453757 S2 Poole, R.L. (2007) The TAIR Database. Methods Mol Biol. 406, 179-212 S3 Oh, S.-J., et al. (2009) Overexpression of the transcription factor AP37 in rice improves grain yield under drought conditions. Plant Physiol. 150, 13681379 S4 Perera, I.Y., et al. (2008) Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the type 1 inositol 5-phosphatase exhibit increased drought tolerance and altered abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 20, 2876-2893 S5 Sakuma, Y., et al. (2006) Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in drought-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 18, 1292-1309 S6 Alexandre, C., et al. (2009) Arabidopsis MSI1 is required for negative regulation of the response to drought stress. Mol Plant 2, 675-687 S7 Mishra, G., et al. (2006) A bifurcating pathway directs abscisic acid effects on stomatal closure and opening in Arabidopsis. Science 312, 264-266 S8 Zeller, G., et al. (2009) Stress-induced changes in the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome analyzed using whole-genome tiling arrays. The Plant Journal 58, 1068-1082 S9 Zhu, Y., et al. (2009) Ectopic over-expression of BhHsf1, a heat shock factor from the resurrection plant Boea hygrometrica, leads to increased thermotolerance and retarded growth in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Molecular Biology 71, 451-467 S10 Zhang, H., et al. (2008) Dolichol biosynthesis and its effects on the unfolded protein response and abiotic stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 1879-1898 S11 Perez, D.E., et al. (2009) BOBBER1 is a noncanonical Arabidopsis small heat shock protein required for both development and thermotolerance. Plant Physiol. 151, 241-252 S12 Liu, H.-T., et al. (2008) The calmodulin-binding protein kinase 3 is part of heat-shock signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 55, 760-773 S13 Priyanka, B., et al. (2010) Expression of pigeonpea hybrid-proline-rich protein encoding gene (CcHyPRP) in yeast and Arabidopsis affords multiple abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Biotechnology Journal 8, 76-87 S14 Kobayashi, F., et al. (2008) Development of abiotic stress tolerance via bZIP-type transcription factor LIP19 in common wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 891-905 S15 Magome, H., et al. (2008) The DDF1 transcriptional activator upregulates expression of a gibberellin-deactivating gene, GA2ox7, under high-salinity stress in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 56, 613-626 S16 Rampino, P., et al. (2006) Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant, Cell and Environment 29, 2143-2152 S17 Qin, F., et al. (2008) Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 20, 1693-1707 S18 Ning, J., et al. (2010) A Raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 152, 876-890 S19 Springer, C.J., et al. (2008) Elevated CO2 influences the expression of floral-initiation genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 178, 63-67 S20 Wang, Y., et al. (2009) Shoot-specific down-regulation of protein farnesyltransferase ({alpha}-subunit) for yield protection against drought in Canola. Mol Plant 2, 191-200 S21 Seo, P.J., et al. (2009) The MYB96 transcription factor mediates abscisic acid signaling during drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 151, 275-289 S22 Zhou, Q.-Y., et al. (2008) Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes,GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 486-503 S23 Mishkind, M., et al. (2009) Heat stress activates phospholipase D and triggers PIP2 accumulation at the plasma membrane and nucleus. The Plant Journal 60, 10-21 S24 Kim, J.S., et al. (2008) Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein7 affects abiotic stress responses by regulating stomata opening and closing in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 55, 455-466 S25 Lee, U., et al. (2008) Modulation of nitrosative stress by S-nitrosoglutathione reductase is critical for thermotolerance and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 786-802 S26 Møller, I.S., et al. (2009) Shoot Na+ exclusion and increased salinity tolerance engineered by cell type-specific alteration of Na+ transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2163-2178

5

S27 Quist, T.M., et al. (2009) HOS3, an ELO-like gene, inhibits effects of ABA and implicates a S-1-P/Ceramide control system for abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 2, 138-151 S28 Schramm, F., et al. (2008) A cascade of transcription factor DREB2A and heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 regulates the heat stress response of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 53, 264-274 S29 Oh, S.-J., et al. (2007) Expression of barley HvCBF4 enhances tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5, 646-656 S30 Fortunati, A., et al. (2008) Isoprene emission is not temperature-dependent during and after severe drought-stress: a physiological and biochemical analysis. The Plant Journal 55, 687-697 S31 Sakamoto, H., et al. (2008) ITN1, a novel gene encoding an ankyrin-repeat protein that affects the ABA-mediated production of reactive oxygen species and is involved in salt-stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 56, 411-422 S32 Barkla, B.J., et al. (2009) Quantitative proteomics of the tonoplast reveals a role for glycolytic enzymes in salt tolerance. Plant Cell 21, 4044-4058 S33 Li, W.-X., et al. (2008) The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. Plant Cell 20, 2238-2251 S34 Ramírez, V., et al. (2009) Drought tolerance in Arabidopsis is controlled by the OCP3 disease resistance regulator. The Plant Journal 58, 578-591 S35 Amir Hossain, M., et al. (2010) The bZIP transcription factor OsABF1 is an ABA responsive element binding factor that enhances abiotic stress signaling in rice. Plant Molecular Biology 72, 557-566 S36 Zhang, L., et al. (2009) Identification of an apoplastic protein involved in the initial phase of salt stress response in rice root by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. 149, 916-928 S37 Rodriguez, A.A., et al. (2009) Polyamine oxidase activity contributes to sustain maize leaf elongation under saline stress. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 4249-4262 S38 Rodriguez-Milla, M.A. and Salinas, J. (2009) Prefoldins 3 and 5 play an essential role in Arabidopsis tolerance to salt stress. Mol Plant 2, 526-534 S39 Hong, Y., et al. (2008) Dual functions of phospholipase D{alpha}1 in plant response to drought. Mol Plant 1, 262-269 S40 Cho, S.K., et al. (2008) Arabidopsis PUB22 and PUB23 are homologous U-Box E3 ubiquitin ligases that play combinatory roles in response to drought stress. Plant Cell 20, 1899-1914 S41 Kurek, I., et al. (2007) Enhanced thermostability of Arabidopsis Rubisco activase improves photosynthesis and growth rates under moderate heat stress. Plant Cell 19, 3230 - 3241 S42 Lee, H.K., et al. (2009) Drought stress-induced Rma1H1, a RING membrane-anchor E3 ubiquitin ligase homolog, regulates aquaporin levels via ubiquitination in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell 21, 622-641 S43 Meiri, D. and Breiman, A. (2009) Arabidopsis ROF1 (FKBP62) modulates thermotolerance by interacting with HSP90.1 and affecting the accumulation of HsfA2-regulated sHSPs. The Plant Journal 59, 387-399 S44 Wilson, P.B., et al. (2009) The nucleotidase/phosphatase SAL1 is a negative regulator of drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 58, 299317 S45 Fujii, H. and Zhu, J.-K. (2009) An autophosphorylation site of the protein kinase SOS2 is important for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 2, 183190 S46 Naya, L., et al. (2007) The response of carbon metabolism and antioxidant defenses of alfalfa nodules to drought stress and to the subsequent recovery of plants. Plant Physiol. 144, 1104-1114 S47 m, Y.J., et al. (2009) Expression of Pyrococcus furiosus superoxide reductase in Arabidopsis enhances heat tolerance. Plant Physiol. 151, 893-904 S48 Mao, X., et al. (2010) TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 683-696 S49 Li, B., et al. (2008) Heterologous expression of the TsVPi gene improves the drought resistance of maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 146-159

6 View publication stats