Power Electronics Converters for Wind Turbine Systems - IEEE Xplore

Power Electronics Converters for Wind Turbine Systems F. Blaabjerg1, M. Liserre2, K. Ma1 1

Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University Pontoppidanstraede 101, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark [email protected], [email protected] 2

Dept. of Electrotechnical and Electronic Engineering Polytechnic of Bari Via E.Orabona 4 70125 - Bari, Italy [email protected]

Abstract – The steady growth of installed wind power which reached 200 GW capacity in 2010, together with the up-scaling of the single wind turbine power capability - 7 MW’s has been announced by manufacturers - has pushed the research and development of power converters towards full scale power conversion, lowered cost pr kW, and increased power density and the need for higher reliability. Substantial efforts are made to comply with the more stringent grid codes, especially grid faults ride-through and reactive power injection, which challenges power converter topologies, because the need for crowbar protection and/or power converter over-rating has been seen in the case of a doubly-fed induction generator. In this paper, power converter technologies are reviewed with focus on single/multi-cell power converter topologies. Further, case studies on the Low Voltage Ride Through demand to power converter technology are presented including a discussion on reliability. It is concluded that as the power level increases in wind turbines, medium voltage power converters will be a dominant power converter configuration.

I. INTRODUCTION Wind turbine system (WTS) technology is the most promising renewable energy technology. It started in the 1980’s with a few tens of kW production power per unit. Today multi-MW size wind turbines are being installed [1], [10], [13]. There is wide-spread use of wind turbine systems in distribution networks as well as wind power stations which are connected to transmission networks. Denmark for example has a high power capacity penetration (> 30 %) of wind energy in major areas of the country and today 25 % of all electrical energy consumption is covered by wind energy. The aim is to achieve a 100 % non-fossil based power generation system in 2050 [3]. Initially, wind power did not have any serious impact on the power system control, but now due to its size, wind power has to play a much more active part in grid operation and control. The technology used in wind turbines was originally based on a squirrel-cage induction generator connected directly to the grid. Power pulsations in the wind were almost directly transferred to the electrical grid by this technology. Furthermore, no control of the active and reactive power exists except for a few capacitor banks which ensured unity power factor at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC). Those control parameters are

978-1-4577-0541-0/11/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE

important regulating the frequency and the voltage in the grid. As the power capacity of the turbines increases those control parameters become even more important and in the last decade it has become necessary to introduce power electronics [6] as an intelligent interface between the wind turbine and the grid. Power electronics is changing the basic characteristic of the wind turbine from being an energy source to being an active power source. The electrical technology used in the wind turbine is not new. It has been discussed for several decades but now the price pr. produced kWh is so low, that solutions with power electronics are very attractive. This paper provides an overview and discusses some trends in power electronics technologies for wind turbines. First, the basic market developments are discussed with a focus on cost, size and power density, also in respect to the adopted generator and to the filter and transformer. Next, wind conversion is discussed with attention to two competing philosophies – one with reduced power converter which has been popular up to now – a second with a full scale power converter which is becoming more and more the preferred choice. Next, promising power converter topologies for wind turbines are presented and compared by classifying them into single-cell and multi-cell structure. Reliability issues are also discussed. Attention is focused on the connection to the grid during ride-through operation. Finally, some views on the technologies are offered suggesting interesting research areas in the near future. II. WIND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Wind power has grown to a cumulative worldwide installation level of 200 GW with close to 40 GW installed alone in 2010, according to BTM Consult, indicating that wind power is really an important player in some areas of the world. The worldwide penetration of wind power electricity was 1.8% and the prediction for 2019 is more than 8% or 1 TW cumulative installations. China was the largest market in 2010 and in general the EU, the USA and China are sharing around one third of the total market. The evolution of the wind turbine market is shown in Fig. 1.

281

Installed Wind Power in the World - Annual and Cumulative -

160,000

35,000

140,000

30,000

120,000

25,000

100,000

20,000

80,000

15,000

60,000

10,000

40,000

5,000

20,000

0 1983

C um ulative M W

MW p er year

40,000

0 1990

Source: BTM Consult ApS - March 2010

1995

2000

2005

2009

Year

Fig. 2. Wind turbine market share distributed by manufacturers in 2010. (source: BTM Consult).

Fig. 1. Annual and cumulative installed Wind Power Capacity from 1985 to 2009 (source: BTM Consult).

In 2010, the Danish company Vestas Wind Systems A/S was still in the top position among the largest manufacturers of wind turbines in the world, closely followed by the Chinese company Sinovel as the second largest in the world. This company was third in 2009 and this data gives some idea of the impressive interest in Asia for wind energy. Fig. 2 shows the wind turbine top suppliers in 2010. A. Generators in wind turbine systems Fig. 3a shows the preferred generator in each of the products of the 1.5-3 MW range by looking at the products offered by several manufacturers. It is evident that synchronous generators, either externally excited or with permanent magnets, are becoming the preferred technology in the best seller power range [1]. Fig. 3b compares the direct driven (DD) synchronous generator (SG) with the 3 stage gearbox (3G) Doubly-Fed Induction Generator (DFIG), using the latter as the base value for both weight and losses [8]-[9]. Multi-pole PMSG with a full power back-to-back converter looks to become the most adopted generator in the near future due to the reduced losses and lower weight if compared to the externally excited SG that is manufactured successfully by, e.g., the German company Enercon. The transition seems mainly to be valid for larger wind turbines (3-6 MW). B. Power electronics converters in wind turbine systems The penetration of power electronics in wind turbine systems has been continuously growing since the 1980’s, when it consisted of a thyristor-based soft-starter just for initially interconnecting the wind turbine and after that being bypassed. In the 1990’s, it was mainly the use of rotor resistance control with a diode bridge and a power electronic switch; finally the back-to-back power converter emerged, first in reduced power for DFIG, then in full power [10], [11], [13]. Fig. 4 shows the evolution of WTS size and the use of power electronics capacity highlighted with an inner circle. The most adopted solution in power converters for wind turbine systems in the best seller range 1.5-3 MW is the use of two two-level voltage source converters in a back-to-back configuration [1]. At lower and higher powers it is possible to find other solutions such as a diode-bridge for the generator in the case of a synchronous generator and the use of multilevel converters to enter medium voltage.

(a)

(b)

Fig. 3. Market survey on generator technology. a) 1.5-3 MW WTS products on the market classified in terms of adopted generators; b) comparison of losses and weight between DFIG (with three stages gearbox) and direct driven synchronous generators SG (either externally excited or with permanent magnets PM) [1].

One of the main issues when comparing power converters for wind turbine systems is the power density: the values are in the range 0.24-0.47 MVA/m3 [2]. The use of parallel power converters can increase the density up to 0.58 MVA/m3. Higher power densities can be obtained using multilevel converters as discussed in [5] where the NPC converter power density can reach 1.3 MVA/m3 in the case of 12 pulse diode-bridge, but excluding the filter and dc/dc converter. The main advantage of this topology is that the converter is directly connected to a medium voltage grid (with voltages between 1 kV to ≈ 5 kV). Medium voltage operation allows a substantial reduction in the current handled by the devices. The demands posed on power electronic converters for wind turbine systems are depicted in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4. Wind turbine evolution and the main trend of power electronic conversion (blue indicates power level of converters) in the last 30 years.

282

complete control of active and reactive power can be obtained in all operating points by using partial-scale power converter or full scale power converter. A. Variable Speed WT with Partial-scale frequency converter This configuration is known as the Doubly-Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) concept, which gives a variable speed controlled wind turbine with a Wound Rotor Induction Generator (WRIG) and partial scale power converter (rated to approx. 30% of nominal generator power) on the rotor circuit. The topology is shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 5. Wind power conversion and demands to power electronics.

As the interface between the wind turbine generator and power grid, the wind power converter has to satisfy the requirements on both sides. For the generator side: the current flowing in the generator stator should be controlled to adjust the rotating speed. This will contribute to the active power balance when the grid faults and help to extract the maximum power from the wind turbines [4]. Moreover, the converter should have the ability to handle variable fundamental frequency and voltage amplitude of the generator output. For the grid side: the converter must comply with the grid codes regardless of the wind speed. This means it should have the ability to control the inductive/capacitive reactive power Q, and perform a fast active power P response. The fundamental frequency as well as voltage amplitude on the grid side should be almost fixed under normal operation, and the total harmonic distortion of the current must be maintained at a low level [31]. Inherently, the converter needs to satisfy both the generator side and grid side requirements with a cost effective and easy maintenance solution. This requires a high power density, reliability and modularity of the entire converter system. Moreover, the wind power converter may need the ability to store the active power, and boost up the voltage from the generator side to the grid side [1]. C. Transformers and filters in wind turbine systems Transformers and filters have a pivotal role for volume and losses. All wind turbine manufacturers are using a step-up transformer for connecting the generator to the grid. Research is on-going in order to replace it with a transformer with a unity transformer ratio or even to avoid it - leading to highpower and high-voltage transformerless solutions [35]. Regarding filters, typically an LCL-filter is the adopted solution to attenuate PWM harmonics [33] but in the case a diode-bridge is adopted on the generator side and in the case of higher power WTS have also strict demands to grid voltage harmonics, trap filters might also be adopted. Damping of resonances is important and the use of passive damping can create extremely high losses and compromise the attenuation [12].

The stator is directly connected to the grid, while a partialscale power converter controls the rotor frequency and thus the rotor speed. The power rating of this partial-scale frequency converter defines the speed range (typically ±30% around synchronous speed). Moreover, this converter performs reactive power compensation and a smooth grid interconnection. The smaller frequency converter makes this concept attractive from an economical point of view. In this case the power electronics is enabling the wind turbine to act as a dynamic power source to the grid. However, its main drawbacks are the use of slip-rings and the protection schemes/controllability in the case of grid faults. The use of a reduced size converter is also feasible with PMSG as e.g. proposed in [21] where a 20% power converter is placed in series with the stator winding to actively damp the generator. B. Variable Speed Wind Turbine with Full-scale Power Converter A variable speed wind turbine configuration with full-scale power conversion corresponds to the full variable speed controlled wind turbine, with the generator connected to the grid through a power converter as shown in Fig. 7. The frequency converter performs the reactive power compensation and a smooth grid connection for the entire speed range. The generator can be electrically excited (wound rotor synchronous generator WRSG) or a permanent magnet excited type (permanent magnet synchronous generator PMSG). The stator windings are connected to the grid through a full-scale power converter.

Fig. 6. Variable speed wind turbine with partial-scale power converter. Transformer

AC

III. WIND TURBINE CONCEPTS

Filter

Gear

As shown in Fig. 4 more and more power electronics have been incorporated into wind turbine systems to improve wind turbine control and to improve the interconnection to the grid system. In this paper, focus is primarily on the systems where

283

Asynchronous/ Synchronous generator

DC DC

Grid

AC

Filter

Full scale power converter

Fig. 7. Variable speed wind turbine with full-scale power converter.

Some variable speed wind turbine systems are gearless – see dotted gearbox in Fig. 7. In these cases, a heavier direct driven multi-pole generator is used. The wind turbine companies Enercon and Siemens Wind Power are examples of manufacturers who are using more direct drive type systems. The voltage level of the full-scale power conversion can be from low-voltage (below 1 kV) to medium voltage level and, in the future the voltage level might be appropriate to connect more directly to the grid system and avoid the transformer [35].

Fig. 8. Full-rated power converter wind turbine with permanent magnet generator.

IV. SINGLE CELL POWER CONVERTERS FOR WIND TURBINES A. Unidirectional power converter solutions Today it is a trend to use a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) in the full-rated power converter wind turbine. As there is no reactive power needed in such a generator and active power flows uni-directionally from the PMSG to the grid through a power converter, only a simple diode rectifier can be applied to the generator side converter in order to obtain a cost-efficient solution. In order to get variable speed operation and stable DC bus voltage, a boost DC-DC converter could be inserted in the DC-link, as shown in Fig. 8. Semi-controlled rectifier solutions are also possible [20].

Fig. 9. Full-rated power converter wind turbine with permanent magnet generator (Current source version).

Fig. 9 shows the use of two current source converters in a back-to-back connection [28]. The advantage of the proposed solution can be to exploit the inductance of the long cables used in wind parks if a dc-distribution is adopted or used in the case of the generator converter is placed in the nacelle while the grid converter is placed at the bottom of the WTS [16].

The 2L-BTB topology is state of the art in DFIG based wind turbines e.g. [7], [10], [13]. Several manufacturers are also using this topology for full-rated power converter wind turbines with a squirrel-cage induction generator.

B. Two-level power converter (2L-BTB)

C. Multilevel power converter

Pulse Width Modulation-Voltage Source Converter with two-level output voltage (2L-PWM-VSC) is the most frequently used three-phase power converter topology thus far in wind turbines systems. The knowledge available in this field is extensive and it is a well established technology. As the interface between the generator and grid in the wind turbine system, two 2L-PWM-VSCs are usually configured as a back-to-back structure (2L-BTB) with a transformer on the grid side, as shown in Fig. 10. A technical advantage of the 2L-BTB solution is the relatively simple structure and few components, which contributes to a well-proven robust and reliable performance.

As mentioned above, power capacity of wind turbines keeps climbing up (even to 10 MW), and it becomes more and more difficult for a traditional 2L-BTB solution to achieve acceptable performance with the available switching devices. With the abilities of more output voltage levels, higher voltage amplitude and larger output power, multi-level converter topologies are becoming the most popular candidates in the wind turbines application [38], [39].

However, as the power and voltage range of the wind turbine are increasing, the 2L-BTB converter may suffer from larger switching losses and lower efficiency at Mega-Watts (MW) and Medium-Voltage (MV) power levels. The available switching devices also need to be paralleled or connected in series in order to obtain the required power and voltage of wind turbines; this may lead to reduced simplicity and reliability of the power converter [40]. Another problem in the 2L-BTB solution is the two-level output voltage. The only two voltage stages introduce relatively higher dv/dt stresses to the generator and transformer. Bulky output filters may be needed to limit the voltage gradient and reduce the THD [39].

Fig. 10. Two-level back-to-back voltage source converter for wind turbines.(2L-BTB)

Generally, multilevel converters can be classified in three categories [39]-[43]: neutral-point diode clamped structure, flying capacitor clamped structure, and cascaded converter cells structure. In order to get a cost-effective design, multilevel converters are mainly used in the 3 MW to 7 MW variable-speed full-scale power converter wind turbines. Several possible multilevel solutions are presented in the following. 1) Three-level Neutral Point diode Clamped Back-To-Back topology (3L-NPC BTB) Three-level Neutral Point diode Clamped topology is one of the most commercialized multi-level converters on the market. Similar to the 2L-BTB, it is usually configured as a back-to-back structure in wind turbines, as shown in Fig. 11, which is called 3L-NPC BTB for convenience.

284

also be major drawbacks. The open-winding impacts on the loss/weight of the generator and the transformer still need to be further investigated. 3) Five-level H-bridge back-to-back topology (5L-HB BTB) The 5L-HB BTB converter is composed of two back-toback H-bridge converters making use of 3L-NPC switching arms, as shown in Fig. 13. It is an extension of 3L-HB BTB, and shares the same special requirements for the openwinding generator and transformer.

Fig. 11. Three-level Neutral Point Clamped back-to-back converter for wind turbines. (3L-NPC BTB)

With the same voltage rating switching devices, 5L-HB BTB can achieve five level output voltage, and double voltage amplitude compared to the 3L-HB BTB solution. These features enable smaller output filter and less current rating in the switching devices as well as in the cables [39], [46]. Fig. 12. Three-level H-bridge back-to-back converter for wind turbines. (3LHB BTB)

It achieves one more output voltage level and less dv/dt stress compared to the 2L-BTB, thus the filter size is smaller. The 3L-NPC BTB is also able to output the double voltage amplitude compared to the two-level topology by the switching devices of the same voltage rating. The mid-point voltage fluctuation of DC-bus used to be a drawback of the 3L-NPC BTB. However, this problem has been extensively researched and is considered solved by the controlling of redundant switching status [42]. However, it is found that the loss distribution is unequal between the outer and inner switching devices in a switching arm, and this problem might lead to de-rated converter power capacity when it is practically designed [42], [44]. 2) Three-level H-bridge back-to-back topology (3L-HB BTB) The 3L-HB BTB solution is composed of two H-bridge converters which are configured in a back-to-back structure, as shown in Fig. 12. It can achieve output performance similar to the 3L-NPC BTB solution, but the unequal loss distribution and clamped diodes are eliminated. More efficient and equal usage of switching devices as well as higher designed power capacity might be obtained [45].

However, compared to 3L-HB BTB, the 5L-HB BTB converter introduces more switching devices, which could reduce the reliability of total system. The problems of unequal loss distribution as well as larger DC link capacitors will unfortunately also return. 4) Three-level Neutral Point diode Clamped topology for generator side and Five-level H-bridge topology for grid side (3L-NPC + 5L-HB) Generally, the output quality requirements of the grid side are much stricter than those of the generator side [29]. To adapt this unsymmetrical requirement for wind power converters, a “compound” configuration employing 3L-NPC topology on the generator side, and 5L-HB topology on the grid side to achieve an unsymmetrical performance, as shown in Fig. 14. On the generator side, this configuration has a performance similar to the 3L-NPC BTB solution. While on the grid side, it has the same performance to 5L-HB BTB. The voltage levels and amplitude of the grid side are higher than those on the generator side. It is noted that an open winding structure in the generator is avoided; the cable length on the generator side is therefore reduced to half, but the potential fault tolerant ability is also eliminated. It has less switching devices compared to 5L-HB BTB, but unequal loss distribution in the switching devices still exists.

Moreover, as only half of the DC bus voltage is needed in 3L-HB BTB compared to the 3L-NPC BTB, there are less series connection of capacitors and no mid-point in DC bus, thus the size of DC-link capacitors can be further reduced. However, a 3L-HB BTB solution needs an open winding structure in the generator and transformer in order to achieve isolation between each phase. This feature has both advantages and disadvantages: on the one hand, an open winding structure enables relatively isolated operation of each phase, and a potential fault tolerant ability is thereby obtained if one or even two phases of the generator or the generator side converter are out of operation. On the other hand, an open winding structure requires double cable length and weight in order to connect with the generator and the transformer. Extra cost, loss and inductance in the cables can

285

Fig. 13. Five-level H-bridge back-to-back converter for wind turbines. (5LHB BTB)

TABLE II COMPARISON OF THE ONE-CELL POWER CONVERTER SOLUTIONS FOR WIND TURBINES. Configurations Output voltage levels

Fig. 14. Three-level Neutral Point Clamped and five-level H-bridge converter for wind turbines. (3L-NPC + 5L-HB)

In all the previously proposed solutions, the large amount of power semiconductors as well as auxiliary components could largely reduce this converter reliability and increase the cost. The total system weight and volume reduction in the wind turbine application still needs to be further investigated. The comparisons between the five solutions for single-cell full-scale power converter wind turbines are shown in Table II, regarding the performance of output voltage levels, power semiconductor numbers, maximum output voltage amplitude, fault tolerant ability, as well as filter size.

3L-NPC BTB

2L BTB

3L-HB BTB

3L-NPC +5L-HB

5L-HB BTB

2

3

3

5

3/5

IGBT number 2

1 pu.

2 pu.

2 pu.

4 pu.

3 pu.

Diode number 2

1 pu.

3 pu.

2 pu.

6 pu.

4.5 pu.

Max output voltage 2

1 pu.

2 pu.

2 pu.

4 pu.

2 / 4 pu.

Fault tolerant ability

No

No

+++

++

Filter size

4

Limited

3

Limited +

++

3

No ++ / +

Note: 1 N is the cascade converter cell number, 2 Value is normalized based on 2L BTB configuration, 3 Fault tolerant ability in the grid side converter may be not allowed, 4 The more +, the larger and heavier.

Fig. 19 shows a power converter obtained with series connection of matrix converters in which outputs feed several windings of a transformer leading to a magnetic parallel configuration [15].

V. MULTIPLE CELLS POWER CONVERTERS FOR WIND TURBINES

MFT

DC

AC

DC

AC

Cell 1

... DC

Cell N DC

AC

DC

AC

Fig. 15. Cascaded H-bridge back-to back converter for wind turbines with Medium Frequency Transformer (S-S).

...

...

Fig. 16 shows a different approach, prosed by Semikron, to increase the power by using a multi-cell structure, i.e. the connection of them in series on a MVDC bus, while the grid converters are connected in parallel [14]. The main advantage is that standard low voltage modules may be used for a MVDC application.

MFT AC

DC

AC

AC

DC

...

A configuration which shares a similar idea with some of the next generation traction converters [48], [49], and European UNIFLEX-PM Project [50] is proposed in Fig. 16. It is based on a back-to-back Cascaded H-bridge converter structure, with galvanic insulated DC/DC converters as interface. The DC/DC converters with medium frequency transformer (MFT) operate at several kHz to dozens of kHz; the transformer size is thereby reduced. Because of the cascaded structure, this configuration can be directly connected to the transmission power grid (10 kV-20 kV) with high output voltage quality, filterless design, and redundancy ability [48]-[50].

AC

DC

...

Up till now, one of the most commercialized cascaded converter cells multilevel topologies is the Cascaded HBridge (CHB) converter as shown in Fig. 15. Unfortunately, the CHB needs an isolated DC-link for each converter cell. This characteristic may involve a complex multi-pulse transformer on the generator side, resulting in larger weight and volume [39], [47].

Fig. 16. Series connection of power converter cells using a common grid converter diode-bridge, an MVDC link and boost converters with 2-level inverters parallel connected to the grid (S-P).

Fig. 17 shows the solution adopted by Gamesa in the 4.5 MW wind turbine [2] with parallel connection of cells both on the generator side and on the grid side. Fig. 18 shows a solution for a high power high voltage transformerless WTS where the coils of the generator are connected to the ac/ac converter that are connected in series on the grid side. The coil windings need to be isolated [35].

286

Fig. 17. Parallel connection of power converters in which PWM signals are interleaved to achive harmonic cancellation (P-P).

Winding A1

automotive industry, where the standards are very high, to a physics-of-failure approach which involves the study of each of the phenomena that lead to failures of power electronics [18]-[19] and also the entire wind turbine.

Winding AN

...

...

The main driver of the semiconductor failures has been found to be the thermal cycling of the different materials, with different expansion coefficients, which stress the power switches. The thermal cycling appears when power semiconductors in the converter commute unevenly and periodically. The thermal chain as shown in Fig. 21 determines a periodical thermal excursion of the different materials, which expand and compress until different failure mechanism are triggered. Different power switches are based on different technologies, e.g. module-integrated or presspack, and on different characteristics leading to a number of possible combinations of failure mechanisms.

Fig. 18. Magnetic parallel connection of power converters on the generator side and series connection on the grid side (MP-S).

Hence it is important that a clear mission profile exist, including the definition of all the stresses to which the semiconductors are subjected, before the power converter reliability is evaluated as illustrated in Fig. 22. Through analysis, understanding and modeling of failure mechanisms and field load, the goal of seeking correlations between electrical measurements on failed components and the observed failure, need to be pursued. This will lead to the development of real time monitoring and prediction that consists of identifying methods for the real time (on-line) detection of the lifetime (wear-out) state of the power transistor (or power diode) by monitoring various relevant (thermal, electrical, optical etc.) sensor signals [22]. For example, the Collector-Emitter voltage VCE of an IGBT, which is subject to an accelerated test, experiences a sudden increase just before the IGBT failure [23] and can be used for predictive maintenance.

Fig. 19. Series connection of matrix converters with magnetic paralleling on the grid side (S-MP). TABLE III. Comparisons of the multi-cell solutions for wind turbines.

Configurations

Generator Transformer

S-S

S-P

P-P

S-MP

MP-S

standard

standard

open winding

standard

open winding

0

++

+

+++

0

Note: The more +, the more large and heavy.

All the reviewed topologies have fault tolerant capabilities and all of them are also using a higher number of components. The main differences are in the requirement they have in respect to the generator and in respect to the transformer as outlined in Table III.

1/2

VI. RELIABILITY ISSUES

4

Reliability is one of the main issues that concerns WTS manufacturers and investors in order to ensure high power security (availability). Market feedback has shown that the control and power converters seem to be more prone to failure even though the gearbox has the largest downtime, as illustrated in Fig. 20 [51]. The need for higher power density in power converters, as already outlined, leads to more compact design, reduced material use and equipment cost [17]. All may invoke new failure mechanisms in the power and control electronics. Exposure to moisture, vibration, dust, chemicals, high voltage and temperature is predominant in wind turbine systems failure drivers. The study of reliability in power electronics is moving from a statistically based approach that has been proven to be unsatisfactory in achieving higher safety levels in the

287

Turbines 1/4

Gearbox

Generator

Electrical

Control

Hydraulic Blades

2

Fig. 20. Wind turbine overview in respect to reliability where registered annual failure rate and down time are illustrated. Data from [51].

Fig. 21. Example of thermal models of the power devices in a power converter.

Fig. 22. From the definition of a mission profile to a reliability model of a power converter in a wind turbine.

Fig. 24. DFIG with crowbar protection to overcome grid fault.

VII. FAULT RIDE THROUGH DEMANDS ON POWER CONVERTER Current control, synchronization, active and reactive power controls are indispensable for correct operation of the WTS and grid faults in particular [30]-[32],[34] are posing demands for the power converters. In fact, all considered grid codes require fault ride-through capabilities for wind turbines to overcome grid faults. Voltage profiles are given specifying the depth of the voltage dip as well as the clearance time. One of the problems is that the calculation of the voltage during all types of unsymmetrical faults is not very well defined in some grid codes. The voltage profile for ride-through capability can be summarized as shown in Fig. 23 for different countries. Denmark has the lowest short circuit time duration with only 100 ms. However, the grid code in Denmark requires that the wind turbine must remain connected to the electrical network during successive faults, which is a technical challenge. On the other hand, Germany and Spain require grid support during faults by reactive current injection up to 100% of the rated current. In the last ten years, the grid codes have challenged the wind turbine technology and forced the use of power electronics. It has on the one hand increased the cost pr. kWh slightly but on the other hand, the technology itself is much more technically sustainable. The extreme conditions such as those caused by grid faults pose severe demands on power electronics converters in the case of DFIG, where the use of a crowbar is needed to protect the rotor-side converter. In the case of IG and SG, the full power converter is also subject to severe thermal cycling. These cases will be briefly reviewed in the following.

Fig. 23. Voltage profile for fault ride-through capability in grid codes for wind power [29].

Fig. 25. Rotor current, rotor voltage and dc-link voltage expressed in pu as a consequence of a 0.85 pu stator voltage sag in case the crowbar is triggered.

A. Fault Ride through demands on power converters for DFIG When a decrease in the stator voltage occurs (See Fig. 23) the electromagnetic field in the generator experiences a drop. The flux can be seen as composed of two terms, one steady state term and one transient term that is responsible for the openrotor electromagnetic force increasing [27]. The limited dcvoltage of the rotor-side converter does not allow handling such a high voltage. Hence the rotor current controllability is lost eventually leading to high rotor current, overcurrent protection leading to stopping the IGBT firing and to a consequent increase of the dc-link voltage due to the rotor current flowing through the bridge freewheeling diodes [24][25]. A typical solution is to use an AC voltage crowbar or using a DC voltage crowbar combined with an over-rating of the rotor-side bridge; see the topology in Fig. 24. Fig. 25 shows the involved electrical quantities in case the ac crowbar is activated. The Safe Operating Area of the semiconductors typically allows them to operate at 200% of the rated current as far as the junction temperature reached in the IGBT is permissible. Hence the converter can be pushed to its limit, operating also during the fault, to flux-weakening of the machine in order to allow a faster reduction of the overvoltage [26]. B. Fault Ride through demands on full power converters for IG and SG Fault ride through operation of a full scale power converter will typically be when the voltage on the grid side is reduced – the current controllers will reduce the modulation index in order to limit the current injected until its maximum value. The modulation index will be decreased but the power converter will generate nominal current which might be reactive current demanded from the grid-codes. Depending on the power converter configuration, the devices used might be more heavy loaded. Fig. 26 shows an example of a thermal

288

study of a power (3L-NPC) when a voltage dip appears in 500 ms.

feasible solution for a large scale off-shore wind farm needing a large power transmission system. REFERENCES [1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5] Fig. 26. Junction temperature dynamic response with a voltage dip time 500 ms (from normal operation with wind speed 8 m/s to 0.05 p.u. LVRT, and then back to normal operation).

[6]

Here it can be seen that some of the devices experience a higher loading in this operating mode and it is important to ensure that maximum temperature is not exceeded as well as that the stress is taken into account when caluculating lifetime etc.

[7]

A future study will be to analyze the different medium voltage converter topologies with respect to life-time both according to the normal operation but also in the case of faulty conditions on the grid. The determination of the mission profile is essential for such calculations.

[9]

VIII. CONCLUSION

[8]

[10]

[11]

The paper has given an overview of different power electronic converters in wind turbine systems with special attention paid to the many possible topologies at low voltage and medium voltage. An important trend is that the technology is moving towards a higher power level and it is inevitable that it go for higher voltage and as a consequence into multilevel single-cell structures or to multi-cell modular structures that can even use standard low voltage power converter modules. The compliance with grid codes, especially low voltage ride through, also has an impact on hardware design: e.g. the use of a crowbar and/or overrating for a reduced power converter for DFIG and higher thermal stress for full power converter for SG or IG. One current concern beyond being able to upscale the power is being better able to predict reliability of power electronic converters and control, as it has been a major failure cause in WTS, and better lifetime prediction and condition monitoring methods in the future will be important to improving the technology. The use of a multi-cell approach in the power converter design can also lead to transformerless high power converters which are directly connected to a medium voltage grid with reduction of power losses, weight and volume. Research is on-going in this direction. Further, as the wind turbines are aggregated into wind power stations --- configurations most useful for single-turbine operation are perhaps not the most

[12]

[13]

[14] [15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

289

M. Liserre, R. Cardenas, M. Molinas, J. Rodriguez,”Overview of Multi-MW wind turbines and wind parks”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 58, No. 4, April 2011, pp. 1081-1095. B. Andresen, J. Birk,“A high power density converter system for the Gamesa G10x 4.5 MW Wind turbine”, Proc. of EPE’2007-Aalborg, 2007, pp. 1-7. Report of Danish Commission on Climate Change Policy, “Green Energy - the road to a Danish energy system without fossil fuels,” September 2010. (Available: http://www.klimakommissionen.dk/enUS/) A.D. Hansen, F. Iov, F. Blaabjerg, L.H. Hansen,”Review of contemporary wind turbine concepts and their market penetration”, Journal of Wind Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2004, pp. 247-263. T. Bruckner, R. Jakob, "New medium-voltage inverter design with very high power density," IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, PESC 2008, pp. 2962-2967, 15-19 June 2008. M.P. Kazmierkowski, R. Krishnan, F. Blaabjerg,”Control in Power Electronics-Selected problems”, Academic Press, 2002. ISBN 0-12402772-5. R. Pena, J.C. Clare, G.M. Asher, “Doubly fed induction generator using back-to-back PWM converters and its application to variable speed wind-energy generation”, Electric Power Application, Vol. 143, No. 3, 1996, pp. 231-241. J. Zhang, Z. Chen, M .Cheng, “Design and comparison of a novel stator interior permanent magnet generator for direct-drive wind turbines”, IET Renewable Power Generation, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 203-2010, 2007. H. Polinder, F. F. A. van der Pijl, G.-J. de Vilder, P. J. Tavner, "Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol.21, no.3, pp.725-733, Sept. 2006 F. Blaabjerg, Z. Chen, S.B. Kjaer, “Power Electronics as Efficient Interface in Dispersed Power Generation Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics, 2004, Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1184-1194. R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre and P. Rodriguez, Grid Converters for Photovoltaic and Wind Power Systems. IEEE/Wiley, 2011. A. Rockhill, M. Liserre, R. Teodorescu, P. Rodriguez, “Grid Filter Design for a Multi-Megawatt Medium-Voltage Voltage Source Inverter," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 58, No. 4, April 2011, pp. 1205-1217. Z. Chen, J.M. Guerrero, F. Blaabjerg, "A Review of the State of the Art of Power Electronics for Wind Turbines," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.24, No.8, pp.1859-1875, Aug. 2009. D. Schreiber, “Power converter circuit arrangement for generators with dynamically variable power output”, US Patent App. 10/104,474, 2002. J. Kang, N. Takada, E. Yamamoto, and E. Watanabe, “High Power Matrix Converter for Wind Power Generation Applications,” Proc. ICPE 2011 (ECCE-Asia), pp. 1331-1336, 2011. P. Tenca, A.A. Rockhill, T.A. Lipo, P. Tricoli, "Current Source Topology for Wind Turbines With Decreased Mains Current Harmonics, Further Reducible via Functional Minimization," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol.23, no.3, pp.1143-1155, May 2008. J. Lutz, H. Schlangenotto, U. Scheuermann and R. W. De Doncker, “Semiconductor Power Devices Physics, Characteristics, Reliability,” Springer Verlag, 2011. E. Wolfgang, L. Amigues, N. Seliger and G. Lugert, “Building-in Reliability into Power Electronics Systems”. The World of Electronic Packaging and System Integration, 2005, pp. 246-252. D. Hirschmann, D. Tissen, S. Schroder, R.W. De Doncker, "Inverter design for hybrid electrical vehicles considering mission profiles," 2005 IEEE Conference on Vehicle Power and Propulsion, 7-9 Sept. 2005, pp. 1-6. D.S. Oliveira, M.M. Reis, C. Silva, L B. Colado, F. Antunes, B.L. Soares, "A Three-Phase High-Frequency Semicontrolled Rectifier for PM WECS," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.25, no.3, pp.677-685, March 2010.

[21] S. Grabic, N. Celanovic, V.A. Katic, "Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Cascade for Wind Turbine Application," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.23, no.3, pp.1136-1142, May 2008. [22] S. Yang, D. Xiang, A. Bryant, P. Mawby, L. Ran, P. Tavner, "Condition Monitoring for Device Reliability in Power Electronic Converters: A Review," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.25, no.11, pp.2734-2752, Nov. 2010. [23] J. Due, S. Munk-Nielsen, Rasmus Nielsen, “Lifetime investigation of high power IGBT modules”, In Proc. of EPE 2011 - Birmingham. [24] F.K.A Lima, A. Luna, P. Rodriguez, E. H. Watanabe, F. Blaabjerg, "Rotor Voltage Dynamics in the Doubly Fed Induction Generator During Grid Faults," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.25, no.1, pp.118-130, Jan. 2010. [25] D. Santos-Martin, J.L. Rodriguez-Amenedo, S. Arnaltes, "Providing Ride-Through Capability to a Doubly Fed Induction Generator Under Unbalanced Voltage Dips," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.24, no.7, pp.1747-1757, July 2009. [26] D. Xiang, Li Ran, P.J. Tavner, S. Yang, "Control of a doubly fed induction generator in a wind turbine during grid fault ride-through," IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol.21, no.3, pp. 652-662, Sept. 2006. [27] J. Lopez, P. Sanchis, E. Gubia, A. Ursua, L. Marroyo, X. Roboam, , "Control of Doubly Fed Induction Generator under symmetrical voltage dips," Proc. of ISIE 2008, 2008, pp. 2456-2462. [28] J. Dai, D.D. Xu, B. Wu, "A Novel Control Scheme for Current-SourceConverter-Based PMSG Wind Energy Conversion Systems," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.24, no.4, pp.963-972, April 2009. [29] M. Altin, O. Goksu, R. Teodorescu, P. Rodriguez, B. Bak-Jensen, L. Helle, "Overview of recent grid codes for wind power integration," Proc. of OPTIM’2010, pp. 1152-1160, 2010. [30] P. Rodriguez, A. Timbus, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, F. Blaabjerg, "Reactive Power Control for Improving Wind Turbine System Behavior Under Grid Faults," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,vol.24, no.7, pp.1798-1801, July 2009. [31] F. Blaabjerg, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, A.V. Timbus, "Overview of Control and Grid Synchronization for Distributed Power Generation Systems," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol.53, no.5, pp.1398-1409, Oct. 2006. [32] A.Timbus, M. Liserre, R. Teodorescu, P. Rodriguez, F. Blaabjerg, "Evaluation of Current Controllers for Distributed Power Generation Systems," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.24, no.3, pp.654-664, March 2009. [33] M. Liserre, F. Blaabjerg, S. Hansen, "Design and control of an LCLfilter-based three-phase active rectifier," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol.41, no.5, pp. 1281- 1291, Sept.-Oct. 2005. [34] P. Rodriguez, A.V. Timbus, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, F. Blaabjerg, "Flexible Active Power Control of Distributed Power Generation Systems During Grid Faults," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol.54, no.5, pp. 2583-2592, Oct. 2007. [35] C.H. Ng, M. A. Parker, Li Ran, P.J.Tavner, J. R. Bumby, E. Spooner, "A Multilevel Modular Converter for a Large, Light Weight Wind Turbine Generator," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.23, no.3, pp.1062-1074, May 2008 [36] K. Ma, F. Blaabjerg, D. Xu, “Power Devices Loading in Multilevel Converters for 10 MW Wind Turbines,” in Proc. of ISIE, 2011, June 2011. [37] K. Ma, F. Blaabjerg, “Multilevel Converters for 10 MW Wind Turbines,” in Proc. of EPE, 2011 - Birmingham. [38] J. M. Carrasco, L. G. Franquelo, J. T. Bialasiewicz, E. Galvan, R. Portillo, M. M. Prats, J. I. Leon, N. Moreno-Alfonso, “Power-electronic systems for the grid integration of renewable energy sources: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, pp. 1002–1016, Jun. 2006. [39] S. Kouro, M. Malinowski, K. Gopakumar, J. Pou, L. G. Franquelo, B. Wu, J. Rodriguez, M. A. Perez, J. I. Leon, “Recent Advances and Industrial Applications of Multilevel Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2553 – 2580, 2010. [40] J. Rodriguez, S. Bernet, Wu Bin, J. O. Pontt, S. Kouro, “Multilevel Voltage-Source-Converter Topologies for Industrial Medium-Voltage Drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2930-2945, 2007.

[41] D. Krug, S. Bernet, S. S. Fazel, K. Jalili, M. Malinowski, “Comparison of 2.3-kV Medium-Voltage Multilevel Converters for Industrial Medium-Voltage Drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2979-2992, 2007. [42] J. Rodriguez, S. Bernet, P. K. Steimer, I. E. Lizama, “A Survey on Neutral-Point-Clamped Inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2219-2230, 2010. [43] R. Teichmann, S. Bernet, “A comparison of three-level converters versus two-level converters for low-voltage drives, traction, and utility applications.” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, no.3, pp. 855-865, 2005. [44] T. Bruckner, S. Bernet, H. Guldner, “The active NPC converter and its loss-balancing control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp.855-868, 2005. [45] O. S. Senturk, L. Helle, S. Munk-Nielsen, P. Rodriguez, R. Teodorescu, “Medium voltage three-level converters for the grid connection of a multi-MW wind turbine,” in Proc. EPE 2009, pp.1- 8, 2009. [46] H. Hosoda, S. Peak, “Multi-level converters for large capacity motor drive,” in Proc. IECON’10, pp. 516-522, 2010. [47] M. Malinowski, K. Gopakumar, J. Rodriguez, M. A. Pérez, “A Survey on Cascaded Multilevel Inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2197-2206, 2010. [48] B. Engel, M. Victor, G. Bachmann, and A. Falk, “15 kV/16.7 Hz energy supply system with medium frequency transformer and 6.5 kV IGBTs in resonant operation,” in Proc. of EPE 2003, Toulouse, France, Sep. 2–4, 2003. [49] S. Inoue, H. Akagi, “A Bidirectional Isolated DC–DC Converter as a Core Circuit of the Next-Generation Medium-Voltage Power Conversion System,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol.22, no. 2, pp. 535-542, 2007. [50] F. Iov, F. Blaabjerg, J. Clare, O. Wheeler, A.Rufer, A. Hyde, “UNIFLEX-PM-A Key-Enabling Technology for Future European Electricity Networks,” EPE Journal, vol. 19, no. 4, pp.6-16, 2009. [51] F. Spinato, P.J. Tavner, G.J.W van Bussel, E. Koutoulakos, "Reliability of wind turbine subassemblies," IET Renewable Power Generation, vol.3, no.4, pp.387-401, December 2009.

290