Dec 14, 2012 - Note. Recidivism measured dichotomously (1 = present, 0 = absent); Zero-Order Correlations = zero order correlations (without any control.
Predicting Recidivism with the PICTS
27
Table 3 Zero-Order and Partial Correlations between the PICTS Scales and Subsequent Recidivism at 6, 12, and 24 Months ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Zero-Order Correlations
Partial Correlations
___________________________________________
PICTS Scale
___________________________________________
6-month
12-month
24-month
___________
___________
____________
___________
___________
___________
T
T
T
T
T
T
M
F
M
F
M
6-month
F
M
12-month
F
M
24-month
F
M
F
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GCT
.19
.19
.20
.20
.21
.21
.25
.25
.25
.11
.11 .14
.12
.12
.14
.15
.14
.17
P
.16
.16
.15
.17
.17
.16
.20
.20
.19
.08
.08 .09
.08
.08
.09
.10
.10
.11
Mo
.13
.13
.11
.14
.14
.12
.17
.17
.15
.07
.07 .07
.07
.07
.08
.09
.09
.11
En
.15
.15
.14
.16
.17
.14
.20
.20
.18
.07
.08 .07
.08
.08
.08
.10
.10
.10
Po
.13
.13
.12
.14
.14
.13
.16
.16
.14
.08
.08 .09
.09
.09
.09
.10
.10
.09
So
.10
.10
.12
.11
.10
.12
.13
.13
.15
.03
.03 .06
.03
.03
.06
.04
.03
.07
.20
.20
.21
.21
.22
.22
.25
.26
.27
.13
.13 .16
.14
.14
.17
.16
.17
.20
.19
.20
.23
.21
.21
.24
.25
.25
.27
.14
.14 .17
.14
.14
.18
.17
.17
.20
R Co
Predicting Recidivism with the PICTS
28
Ci
.15
.15
.15
.16
.16
.17
.20
.20
.21
.10
.09 .12
.10
.10
.13
.13
.12
.16
Ds
.18
.18
.19
.19
.19
.19
.22
.23
.23
.11
.11 .14
.12
.12
.14
.14
.15
.17
Note. Recidivism measured dichotomously (1 = present, 0 = absent); Zero-Order Correlations = zero order correlations (without any control variables); Partial Correlations = partial correlation controlling for age and criminal history; 6-month = follow-up of 6 or more months; 12-month = follow-up of 12 or more months; 24-month = follow-up of 24 or more months; PICTS = Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles; GCT = general criminal thinking score; P = proactive criminal thinking score; Mo = mollification criminal thinking style scale; En = entitlement criminal thinking style scale; Po = power orientation criminal thinking style scale; So = superoptimism criminal thinking style scale; R = reactive criminal thinking score; Co = cutoff criminal thinking style scale; Ci = cognitive indolence criminal thinking style scale; Ds = discontinuity criminal thinking style scale; T = total sample; M = male subsample; F = female subsample; Ns for total sample (6-month = 96,400, 12-month = 66,720, 24-month = 26,226), male subsample (6-month = 81,881, 12-month = 56,393, 24-month = 21,965), and female subsample (6-month = 14,519, 12-month = 10,327, 24-month = 4,261). All correlations significant using a Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of .00028 (.05 / 180 correlations).
Predicting Recidivism with the PICTS
29
Table 4 Area under the Curve (AUC) Values Achieved by PICTS Scales as Predictors of Recidivism at 24 Months _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Area under the Curve (AUC) _________________________________________________________________________________________ Sex
Race
_______________________ PICTS
Total
Male
Female
Ethnicity
______________________ Black
White
_______________________ Hispanic
non-Hispanic
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GCT
.65(.64, .66)
.65(.64, .66)
.67(.65, .69)
.62(.60, .63)
.66(.65, .67)
.63(.61, .65)
.66(.65, .66)
P
.63(.62, .64)
.63(.62, .63)
.64(.62, .66)
.59(.58, .60)
.63(.62, .64)
.60(.59, .62)
.63(.62, .64)
Mo
.60(.60, .61)
.60(.60, .61)
.60(.58, .62)
.59(.58, .60)
.60(.59, .61)
.60(.58, .61)
.61(.61, .61)
En
.62(.61, .63)
.62(.61, .63)
.63(.61, .65)
.60(.59, .61)
.63(.62, .64)
.61(.59, .62)
.64(.63, .64)
Po
.59(.59, .60)
.59(.59, .60)
.59(.57, .61)
.58(.57, .59)
.61(.60, .62)
.59(.57, .60)
.61(.60, .62)
So
.59(.58, .59)
.58(.57, .59)
.60(.58, .62)
.57(.56, .58)
.60(.59, .61)
.59(.57, .60)
.60(.59, .61)
.65(.65, .66)
.65(.65, .66)
.67(.65, .69)
.62(.61, .63)
.67(.66, .68)
.63(.61, .65)
.66(.65, .66)
Co
.64(.63, .64)
.64(.63, .65)
.66(.64, .68)
.64(.62, .65)
.67(.66, .68)
.64(.63, .66)
.66(.65, .67)
Ci
.62(.61, .63)
.62(.61, .63)
.64(.62, .66)
.61(.60, .62)
.64(.63, .65)
.61(.59, .63)
.64(.63, .66)
Ds
.64(.63, .64)
.64(.63, .65)
.65(.63, .67)
.63(.62, .64)
.67(.66, .68)
.64(.62, .66)
.66(.65, .66)
R
Predicting Recidivism with the PICTS
30
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Note. 24-month follow-up data utilized; recidivism measured dichotomously (1 = present, 0 = absent); PICTS = Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles; GCT = general criminal thinking score; P = proactive criminal thinking score; Mo = mollification criminal thinking style scale; En = entitlement criminal thinking style scale; Po = power orientation criminal thinking style scale; So = superoptimism criminal thinking style scale; R = reactive criminal thinking score; Co = cutoff criminal thinking style scale; Ci = cognitive indolence criminal thinking style scale; Ds = discontinuity criminal thinking style scale; Total = total sample; Sex = gender (male or female); Male = male subsample; Female = female subsample; Race = race (black or white); Black = black subsample; White = white subsample; Ethnicity = ethnic status (Hispanic or non-Hispanic); Hispanic = Hispanic subsample; Ns for total sample (26,226), male subsample (21,965), female subsample (4,261); black subsample (9,636); white subsample (16,521); Hispanic subsample (5,750); non-Hispanic subsample (20,197).
All AUCs significant using a Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of .00071 (.05 / 70 AUCs).
Predicting Recidivism with the PICTS
31
80 70
% Recidivism
60 50 GCT >= T60
40
GCT = T50-‐59
30
GCT < T50
20 10 0 Low Risk
Low-‐Moderate Risk
Moderate Risk
High Risk
All Risk Levels
PCRA Risk Level Figure 1. Recidivism rates (6 months or more) of male probationers and supervised releases with low (T-score < 50), moderate (Tscore = 50-59), and high (T-score > 60) elevations on the PICTS GCT score across each of the four PCRA risk levels
Predicting Recidivism with the PICTS
32
80 70
% Recidivism
60 50 GCT >= T60
40
GCT = T50-‐59
30
GCT < T50
20 10 0 Low Risk
Low-‐Moderate Risk
Moderate Risk
High Risk
All Risk Levels
PCRA Risk Level Figure 2. Recidivism rates (6 months or more) of female probationers and supervised releases with low (T-score < 50), moderate (Tscore = 50-59), and high (T-score > 60) elevations on the PICTS GCT score across each of the four PCRA risk levels